DOCSLIB.ORG

Based Nuclear Fuels

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Based Nuclear Fuels THE PREPARATION AND APPLICATION OF THORIUM- BASED NUCLEAR FUELS A thesis submitted to the Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Sheffield by Ross Peel, MEng In support of the application for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Originally submitted December 2016 Final version submitted with minor amendments September 2017 SUMMARY Thorium is currently produced primarily as an impure by-product of the mining and processing of the rare earth phosphate mineral monazite. Thorium concentrates are currently purified industrially by solvent extraction with PC-88a, but this extractant cannot separate uranium and iron from thorium. In this work mixtures of PC-88a and HDEHP were investigated for the mutual separation of uranium, thorium and iron. The extracted complexes were identified. U and Fe were extracted by cation exchange, while Th was extracted by a mixed cation exchange/solvation mechanism. It was found that three contact stages could extract > 99% of the thorium. A flowsheet was proposed. The first modern use of thorium as a nuclear fuel is most likely to be as an oxide fuel within Generation III+ nuclear reactors. In this work a uranium- plutonium mixed oxide was investigated as a fissile driver for thorium in the Enhanced CANDU 6 reactor, as an alternative to the proposed UK CANMOX fuel for irradiation of the UK plutonium inventory. A large number of fuel concepts were considered, and several were analysed by Monte Carlo simulation. It was found that U-Pu-Th fuels could offer transmutation of the plutonium, irradiate UK reprocessed uranium and give improved coolant void reactivities, while irradiating thorium and converting it to fissile 233U. Thorium and uranium may be recovered from spent nuclear fuel by the Acid THOREX process, which uses TBP solvent extraction. However, TBP has a number of disadvantages. In this work several alternative solvent extraction systems were investigated for the separation of Th, U, Fe and Zr. PC-88a was mixed with ten other extractants as potential synergists, extracting from hydrochloric, nitric and sulfuric acids. Several promising systems were identified based on distribution ratios and separation factors. i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The work presented in this thesis would not have been possible without the contribution of a great number of people, who have helped to shape my ideas and provide me with those opportunities and experiences which have been vital to me in reaching the point of submitting a doctoral thesis and successfully completing a viva voce examination. At the University of Sheffield I must begin by acknowledging the contribution of my academic supervisory team, which has undergone some significant changes over the three years (and twenty seven months) of my Ph.D. programme. Professor Karl Whittle provided the impetus for this work and encouragement and support through the process, continuing to do so even since taking up a new post at the University of Liverpool. Professor John Provis has provided much needed continuity through the process. Dr. Mark Ogden has been instrumental in providing day-to-day advice and guidance in the technical aspects of the work, particularly regarding the thorium separations work presented in Chapters 3 and 6, in addition to the necessary counselling when the scope of the work seemed overwhelming. I would also like to thank Dr. Iain Hannah for his assistance in the role of a thesis writing mentor for providing the necessary kick up the bottom required for me to get into the process of writing. The elemental concentration analyses by ICP-MS and ICP-OES presented in this work were performed by external services. ICP-MS was carried about by Dr. Gabriella Kakonyi and Dr. Andrew Fairburn in the Groundwater Protection and Restoration Group of the Kroto Research Institute, University of Sheffield. ICP-OES was carried out by Mr. Martin Jennings of the University of Manchester and Dr. Sarah Pepper, with much advice on the technique to the author from both parties. Due to this work being completed through the Nuclear FiRST Doctoral Training Centre, many people at the University of Manchester have also been very helpful at various stages of the work. In particular, Dr. Clint ii Sharrad and Dr. Richard Foster provided technical insights and help in accessing analytical facilities at the institution. The mineral samples analysed in Appendix A, and a good number of other samples besides, were provided by Dr. David Gelsthorpe at the Manchester Museum on a highly extended loan. For assistance with the work presented on neutronic simulation in Chapter 5 I would like to thank Professor Tim Abram at the University of Manchester for providing access to the Redqueen and CFS2 high power computing infrastructures, and also Seddon Atkinson at the University of Sheffield for his help in working with Redhat Scientific Linux. Also related to the simulation work presented in Chapter 5, I would like to thank Dr. Jim Kuijper of NUCLIC for his expert input and feedback on the work done in this chapter, leading towards to publication of this work. The work described in Chapter 4 was originally carried out during a 12 week industrial placement with AREVA S.A. in Paris, France, under the direction of Dr. Luc Van Den Durpel. This contact was provided by Dr. Stephanie Cornet, now at the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, for which the author is extremely grateful. All those in the AREVA Research, Development and Innovation management team are thanked for their patience and understanding as I rediscovered my French-speaking abilities after over four years of letting them go to rust. In particular I wish to thank Patrick Chaucheprat for his many inspirational tales of managing research projects on the Superphénix experimental fast reactor, and Isabelle Perraud for her assistance with matters of administration and organisation. There are also a great number of people who have supported me personally during the Ph.D. process. I must begin by thanking my parents, without whose unending love and support over the last 28 years I would never have been able to reach this point. In particular, their provision of free full-board accommodation during the final 12 months of the Ph.D. process are appreciated beyond measure. On that note I must also say thank you to Dr. iii Richard Walker, friend and landlord, for allowing me to continue living in his property even when paying the rent became problematic. I also thank my partner Laura Bird for keeping me sane and happy during the last 2.5 years, making sure I did not forget that there is a life beyond research, and in particular being willing to bear with me during the intensive work period of the last few months. She has provided me with a new outlook on life, and a vision of a happier future than I had heretofore imagined possible. Finally, the work reported in this thesis would also not have been possible without: ~£75,000 in stipends, consumables and travel/conference expenses, plus however much more in on-costs. Thank you EPSRC! Three laptops (two which gradually became too slow to tolerate) 21 GB of online cloud data storage ~250 hours underwater on SCUBA diving holidays ~3000 Tesco finest cookies (various flavours) ~250 litres of cappuccino ~3 litres of espresso at AREVA (because when in Rome….) A truly inestimable quantity of real ale, primarily supplied by the Red Deer (18 Pitt Street, Sheffield), the Cobden View (40 Cobden View Road, Sheffield), and the Hallamshire House (49-51 Commonside, Sheffield). “As for me, I had the time of my life.” – Stephan King, “On Being Nineteen (And a Few Other Things)” iv TABLE OF CONTENTS Summary ........................................................................................................................ i Acknowledgements ................................................................................................... ii Table of Contents ........................................................................................................ v List of Tables ............................................................................................................ xiii List of Figures .......................................................................................................... xvi List of Nomenclature ........................................................................................... xxvi 1 Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Aims ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 The Structure of This Thesis ................................................................... 2 1.3 Global Context – The Need for Nuclear Energy ................................. 3 1.4 The Modern Nuclear Power Industry .................................................. 4 1.4.1 Uranium-based Nuclear Fuel – Supply and Demand ...................... 4 1.4.2 Reducing Fuel Resource Utilisation ...................................................... 5 1.4.3 Options for Sustainable Nuclear Fuel Management ........................ 6 1.5 Thorium as an Alternative Fuel to Uranium ..................................... 6 1.5.1 The Limitations of Thorium ..................................................................... 7 1.5.2 The Use of Thorium as a Nuclear Fuel .................................................. 7 1.6 Nuclear Power in the United Kingdom ................................................ 9 1.6.1 Historical
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Depleted Uranium Technical Brief
    Disclaimer - For assistance accessing this document or additional information,please contact [email protected]. Depleted Uranium Technical Brief United States Office of Air and Radiation EPA-402-R-06-011 Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 20460 December 2006 Depleted Uranium Technical Brief EPA 402-R-06-011 December 2006 Project Officer Brian Littleton U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Radiation and Indoor Air Radiation Protection Division ii iii FOREWARD The Depleted Uranium Technical Brief is designed to convey available information and knowledge about depleted uranium to EPA Remedial Project Managers, On-Scene Coordinators, contractors, and other Agency managers involved with the remediation of sites contaminated with this material. It addresses relative questions regarding the chemical and radiological health concerns involved with depleted uranium in the environment. This technical brief was developed to address the common misconception that depleted uranium represents only a radiological health hazard. It provides accepted data and references to additional sources for both the radiological and chemical characteristics, health risk as well as references for both the monitoring and measurement and applicable treatment techniques for depleted uranium. Please Note: This document has been changed from the original publication dated December 2006. This version corrects references in Appendix 1 that improperly identified the content of Appendix 3 and Appendix 4. The document also clarifies the content of Appendix 4. iv Acknowledgments This technical bulletin is based, in part, on an engineering bulletin that was prepared by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Radiation and Indoor Air (ORIA), with the assistance of Trinity Engineering Associates, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Spent Fuel Reprocessing
    Spent Fuel Reprocessing Robert Jubin Oak Ridge National Laboratory Reprocessing of used nuclear fuel is undertaken for several reasons. These include (1) recovery of the valuable fissile constituents (primarily 235U and plutonium) for subsequent reuse in recycle fuel; (2) reduction in the volume of high-level waste (HLW) that must be placed in a geologic repository; and (3) recovery of special isotopes. There are two broad approaches to reprocessing: aqueous and electrochemical. This portion of the course will only address the aqueous methods. Aqueous reprocessing involves the application of mechanical and chemical processing steps to separate, recover, purify, and convert the constituents in the used fuel for subsequent use or disposal. Other major support systems include chemical recycle and waste handling (solid, HLW, low-level liquid waste (LLLW), and gaseous waste). The primary steps are shown in Figure 1. Figure 1. Aqueous Reprocessing Block Diagram. Head-End Processes Mechanical Preparations The head end of a reprocessing plant is mechanically intensive. Fuel assemblies weighing ~0.5 MT must be moved from a storage facility, may undergo some degree of disassembly, and then be sheared or chopped and/or de-clad. The typical head-end process is shown in Figure 2. In the case of light water reactor (LWR) fuel assemblies, the end sections are removed and disposed of as waste. The fuel bundle containing the individual fuel pins can be further disassembled or sheared whole into segments that are suitable for subsequent processing. During shearing, some fraction of the radioactive gases and non- radioactive decay product gases will be released into the off-gas systems, which are designed to recover these and other emissions to meet regulatory release limits.
    [Show full text]
  • Tailings and Their Component Radionuclides from the Biosphere-Some Earth Science Perspectives
    Tailings and Their Component Radionuclides From the Biosphere-Some Earth Science Perspectives Isolation of Uranium Mill Tailings and Their Component Radionuclides From the Biosphere-Some Earth Science Perspectives By Edward Landa GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 814 A critical review of the literature dealing with uranium mill tailings, with emphasis on the geologic and geochemical processes affecting the long-term containment of radionuclides 1980 United States Department of the Interior CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary Geological Survey H. William Menard, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. 79-600148 Free on application to Branch of Distribution, U.S. Geological Survey 1200 South Eads Street, Arlington, VA 22202 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction ------------------------------------------------------------­ 1 Acknowledginents ---------_----------------------------------------------- 2 Quantity and location of the tailings --------------------------------------­ 2 Radioactivity in tailings --------------------------------------------------­ 4 Sources of potential human radiation exposure from uranium mill tailings ------ 6 Radon emanation ----------------------------------------------------- 6 VVind transport ------------------------------------------------------- 6 Surface water transport and leaching ----------------------------------- 7 External gamma radiation -------------------------------------------­ 8 Contamination of terrestrial and aquatic vegetation ---------------------- 8 Seepage ----------------------------------------------------~--------
    [Show full text]
  • Advanced Reactors with Innovative Fuels
    Nuclear Science Advanced Reactors with Innovative Fuels Workshop Proceedings Villigen, Switzerland 21-23 October 1998 NUCLEAR•ENERGY•AGENCY OECD, 1999. Software: 1987-1996, Acrobat is a trademark of ADOBE. All rights reserved. OECD grants you the right to use one copy of this Program for your personal use only. Unauthorised reproduction, lending, hiring, transmission or distribution of any data or software is prohibited. You must treat the Program and associated materials and any elements thereof like any other copyrighted material. All requests should be made to: Head of Publications Service, OECD Publications Service, 2, rue AndrÂe-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France. OECD PROCEEDINGS Proceedings of the Workshop on Advanced Reactors with Innovative Fuels hosted by Villigen, Switzerland 21-23 October 1998 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT Pursuant to Article 1 of the Convention signed in Paris on 14th December 1960, and which came into force on 30th September 1961, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) shall promote policies designed: − to achieve the highest sustainable economic growth and employment and a rising standard of living in Member countries, while maintaining financial stability, and thus to contribute to the development of the world economy; − to contribute to sound economic expansion in Member as well as non-member countries in the process of economic development; and − to contribute to the expansion of world trade on a multilateral, non-discriminatory basis in accordance with international obligations. The original Member countries of the OECD are Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • NPR81: South Korea's Shifting and Controversial Interest in Spent Fuel
    JUNGMIN KANG & H.A. FEIVESON Viewpoint South Korea’s Shifting and Controversial Interest in Spent Fuel Reprocessing JUNGMIN KANG & H.A. FEIVESON1 Dr. Jungmin Kang was a Visiting Research Fellow at the Center for Energy and Environmental Studies (CEES), Princeton University in 1999-2000. He is the author of forthcoming articles in Science & Global Security and Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology. Dr. H.A. Feiveson is a Senior Research Scientist at CEES and a Co- director of Princeton’s research Program on Nuclear Policy Alternatives. He is the Editor of Science and Global Security, editor and co-author of The Nuclear Turning Point: A Blueprint for Deep Cuts and De-alerting of Nuclear Weapons (Brookings Institution, 1999), and co-author of Ending the Threat of Nuclear Attack (Stanford University Center for International Security and Arms Control, 1997). rom the beginning of its nuclear power program could reduce dependence on imported uranium. During in the 1970s, the Republic of Korea (South Ko- the 1990s, the South Korean government remained con- Frea) has been intermittently interested in the cerned about energy security but also began to see re- reprocessing of nuclear-power spent fuel. Such repro- processing as a way to address South Korea’s spent fuel cessing would typically separate the spent fuel into three disposal problem. Throughout this entire period, the constituent components: the unfissioned uranium re- United States consistently and effectively opposed all maining in the spent fuel, the plutonium produced dur- reprocessing initiatives on nonproliferation grounds. We ing reactor operation, and the highly radioactive fission review South Korea’s evolving interest in spent fuel re- products and transuranics other than plutonium.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Reprocessed Uranium Current Status and Future Prospects
    IAEA-TECDOC-1529 Management of Reprocessed Uranium Current Status and Future Prospects February 2007 IAEA-TECDOC-1529 Management of Reprocessed Uranium Current Status and Future Prospects February 2007 The originating Section of this publication in the IAEA was: Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Materials Section International Atomic Energy Agency Wagramer Strasse 5 P.O. Box 100 A-1400 Vienna, Austria MANAGEMENT OF REPROCESSED URANIUM IAEA, VIENNA, 2007 IAEA-TECDOC-1529 ISBN 92–0–114506–3 ISSN 1011–4289 © IAEA, 2007 Printed by the IAEA in Austria February 2007 FOREWORD The International Atomic Energy Agency is giving continuous attention to the collection, analysis and exchange of information on issues of back-end of the nuclear fuel cycle, an important part of the nuclear fuel cycle. Reprocessing of spent fuel arising from nuclear power production is one of the strategies for the back end of the fuel cycle. As a major fraction of spent fuel is made up of uranium, chemical reprocessing of spent fuel would leave behind large quantities of separated uranium which is designated as reprocessed uranium (RepU). Reprocessing of spent fuel could form a crucial part of future fuel cycle methodologies, which currently aim to separate and recover plutonium and minor actinides. The use of reprocessed uranium (RepU) and plutonium reduces the overall environmental impact of the entire fuel cycle. Environmental considerations will be important in determining the future growth of nuclear energy. It should be emphasized that the recycling of fissile materials not only reduces the toxicity and volumes of waste from the back end of the fuel cycle; it also reduces requirements for fresh milling and mill tailings.
    [Show full text]
  • EMD Uranium (Nuclear Minerals) Committee
    EMD Uranium (Nuclear Minerals) Committee EMD Uranium (Nuclear Minerals) Mid-Year Committee Report Michael D. Campbell, P.G., P.H., Chair December 12, 2011 Vice-Chairs: Robert Odell, P.G., (Vice-Chair: Industry), Consultant, Casper, WY Steven N. Sibray, P.G., (Vice-Chair: University), University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE Robert W. Gregory, P.G., (Vice-Chair: Government), Wyoming State Geological Survey, Laramie, WY Advisory Committee: Henry M. Wise, P.G., Eagle-SWS, La Porte, TX Bruce Handley, P.G., Environmental & Mining Consultant, Houston, TX James Conca, Ph.D., P.G., Director, Carlsbad Research Center, New Mexico State U., Carlsbad, NM Fares M Howari, Ph.D., University of Texas of the Permian Basin, Odessa, TX Hal Moore, Moore Petroleum Corporation, Norman, OK Douglas C. Peters, P.G., Consultant, Golden, CO Arthur R. Renfro, P.G., Senior Geological Consultant, Cheyenne, WY Karl S. Osvald, P.G., Senior Geologist, U.S. BLM, Casper WY Jerry Spetseris, P.G., Consultant, Austin, TX Committee Activities During the past 6 months, the Uranium Committee continued to monitor the expansion of the nuclear power industry and associated uranium exploration and development in the U.S. and overseas. New power-plant construction has begun and the country is returning to full confidence in nuclear power as the Fukushima incident is placed in perspective. India, Africa and South America have recently emerged as serious exploration targets with numerous projects offering considerable merit in terms of size, grade, and mineability. During the period, the Chairman traveled to Columbus, Ohio to make a presentation to members of the Ohio Geological Society on the status of the uranium and nuclear industry in general (More).
    [Show full text]
  • Background, Status and Issues Related to the Regulation of Advanced Spent Nuclear Fuel Recycle Facilities
    NUREG-1909 Background, Status, and Issues Related to the Regulation of Advanced Spent Nuclear Fuel Recycle Facilities ACNW&M White Paper Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste and Materials NUREG-1909 Background, Status, and Issues Related to the Regulation of Advanced Spent Nuclear Fuel Recycle Facilities ACNW&M White Paper Manuscript Completed: May 2008 Date Published: June 2008 Prepared by A.G. Croff, R.G. Wymer, L.L. Tavlarides, J.H. Flack, H.G. Larson Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste and Materials THIS PAGE WAS LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY ii ABSTRACT In February 2006, the Commission directed the Advisory Committee on Nuclear Waste and Materials (ACNW&M) to remain abreast of developments in the area of spent nuclear fuel reprocessing, and to be ready to provide advice should the need arise. A white paper was prepared in response to that direction and focuses on three major areas: (1) historical approaches to development, design, and operation of spent nuclear fuel recycle facilities, (2) recent advances in spent nuclear fuel recycle technologies, and (3) technical and regulatory issues that will need to be addressed if advanced spent nuclear fuel recycle is to be implemented. This white paper was sent to the Commission by the ACNW&M as an attachment to a letter dated October 11, 2007 (ML072840119). In addition to being useful to the ACNW&M in advising the Commission, the authors believe that the white paper could be useful to a broad audience, including the NRC staff, the U.S. Department of Energy and its contractors, and other organizations interested in understanding the nuclear fuel cycle.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Strategies and the Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Technologies
    energies Review A Review of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle Strategies and the Spent Nuclear Fuel Management Technologies Laura Rodríguez-Penalonga * ID and B. Yolanda Moratilla Soria ID Cátedra Rafael Mariño de Nuevas Tecnologías Energéticas, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, 28015 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-91-542-2800 (ext. 2481) Received: 19 June 2017; Accepted: 6 August 2017; Published: 21 August 2017 Abstract: Nuclear power has been questioned almost since its beginnings and one of the major issues concerning its social acceptability around the world is nuclear waste management. In recent years, these issues have led to a rise in public opposition in some countries and, thus, nuclear energy has been facing even more challenges. However, continuous efforts in R&D (research and development) are resulting in new spent nuclear fuel (SNF) management technologies that might be the pathway towards helping the environment and the sustainability of nuclear energy. Thus, reprocessing and recycling of SNF could be one of the key points to improve the social acceptability of nuclear energy. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to review the state of the nuclear waste management technologies, its evolution through time and the future advanced techniques that are currently under research, in order to obtain a global vision of the nuclear fuel cycle strategies available, their advantages and disadvantages, and their expected evolution in the future. Keywords: nuclear energy; nuclear waste management; reprocessing; recycling 1. Introduction Nuclear energy is a mature technology that has been developing and improving since its beginnings in the 1940s. However, the fear of nuclear power has always existed and, for the last two decades, there has been a general discussion around the world about the future of nuclear power [1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • Operational Feedback Ventional Enriched FA
    Background › Starting in 2009, Framatome has been supplying Size- › Totally Framatome has delivered more than 1000 FAs to well B* with fuel assemblies (FAs) with Enriched Re- Sizewell B, approximately half of them containing ERU. processed Uranium (ERU). The enrichment process of the reprocessed uranium is completed in Russia with an objective of minimizing even › Reprocessed uranium is understood as a secondary uranium isotopes such as 232U and 236U. The even isoto- uranium supply pes do not contribute to fi ssion; they are considered – by direct enrichment services to be an absorber and therefore, their presence needs to be minimized, which improves overall fuel utilization. – by blending with other feed material of a higher The low residual fraction of these parasitic isotopes is enrichment compensated by having slightly higher enrichment of 235U – by a combination of both to achieve equivalent reactivity to conventional enriched Enriched uranium.1,2 Reprocessed Uranium Neutronic Design › T he neutronic design of ERU FAs is designed for having the same reactivity characteristic as the equivalent con- Operational Feedback ventional enriched FA. This is achieved by the compen- sation of the 236U and other isotopes content through higher 235U enrichment (see fi g. 1 and 2). › Figure 2 shows the kinf versus the FA burn up of up to 80 MWd/kgU. Since the kinf values are very similar for ENU (enriched natural uranium) and ERU (enriched re- Fig. 2 Fig. 1 k comparison of ENU and ERU fuel versus processed uranium) fuel, the delta is shown as well in inf 235U compensation burn up – for neutronic FA design, upper the lower section.
    [Show full text]
  • Reprocessing of Spent Nuclear Fuel
    Reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen independent consultant member of the Nuclear Consulting Group November 2019 [email protected] Note In this document the references are coded by Q-numbers (e.g. Q6). Each reference has a unique number in this coding system, which is consistently used throughout all publications by the author. In the list at the back of the document the references are sorted by Q-number. The resulting sequence is not necessarily the same order in which the references appear in the text. reprocessing20191107 1 Contents Roots of reprocessing Once-through and closed-cycle systems Reprocessing of spent nuclear fuel Reprocessing and the Second Law Separation Purification Reprocessed uranium Plutonium Neptunium-237 Americium MOX fuel in LWRs Destruction of HEU and Pu: burning the Cold War legacy Uranium-plutonium breeder systems Reprocessing of FBR fuel Thorium for fission power Uranium-233 Molten-salt reactor Partitioning and transmutation Nuclear terrorism Vitrification Discharges Entropy generation by reprocessing Concluding notes References TABLES Table 1 Reprocessing plants world-wide Table 2 Discharges of radionuclides in the liquid and gaseous effluents of a reprocessing plant Table 3 Discharge limits of reprocessing plants to the sea Table 4 Discharge limits of reprocessing plants at La Hague FIGURES Figure 1 Mass composition of fresh and spent nuclear fuel Figure 2 Mass flows of reprocessing Figure 3 Outline of plutonium recycling in LWRs Figure 4 Outline of uranium-plutonium breeder cycle Figure 5 Principle of a partitioning and transmutation system Figure 6 Redistribution of the radioactive contents of spent fuel by reprocessing Figure 7 Symbolic representation of the entropy production by reprocessing reprocessing20191107 2 Roots of reprocessing Reprocessing technology has been developed during the late 1940s and during the Cold War to recover plutonium from spent fuel from special military reactors for the production of nuclear weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography of U. S. Geological Survey Reports on Uranium and Thorium 1942 Through May 1958
    t Bibliography of U. S. Geological Survey Reports On Uranium and Thorium 1942 Through May 1958 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1107-A This compilation was done on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission and is published with the permission of the Commission Bibliography of U. S. Geological Survey Reports On Uranium and Thorium 1942 Through May 1958 By PAUL E. SOISTER and DORA R. CONKLIN CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE GEOLOGY OF URANIUM GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1107-A This compilation was done on behalf of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission and is published with the permission of the Commission UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1959 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRED A. SEATON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY THOMAS B. NOLAN, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 50 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Index No. Page Introduction _.__________________________ 1 Reports and authors listed________________ 1 Method of listing reports_________________ 1 Explanation of area and subject index_.______ 2 Acknowledgments .. __ 3 Availability of reports__.________________ 3 Depositories of U.S. Geological Survey open-file reports ________________________ 4 Depository libraries of U.S. Atomic Energy Com­ mission reports in the United States __._ 6 Depository libraries of U.S. Atomic Energy Com­ mission reports outside the United States__ 9 Reports ____________-__________________ 11 U.S. Geological Survey publications.. _ 1-760 11 Bulletins ._______________________ 1-112 11 Circulars _.._ ..____ _-___ ._.___.._ 200-297 20 Professional papers .__.. _..._...._-____.___ 300-398 25 Maps and reports -__-___._.________ 400-760 33 Coal investigations maps .
    [Show full text]