Coal Preparation at Tahmoor Colliery 123

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coal Preparation at Tahmoor Colliery 123 119 特 別 COAL PREPARATION AT TAHMOOR 講 演 COLLIERY W.G.TWEDDLE TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.INTRODUCTION 119 7.1 Plant Automation 131 2.BACKGROUND INFORMATION 121 7.2 Reject Disposal 131 3.MINING OPERATIONS 122 7.3 Environmental 131 4.RA W COAL QUALITY 123 7.4 Plant Manning 133 5.DESIGN CONCEPT 124 8. QUALITY CONTROL 133 6.PROCESS DESCRIPTION 126 8.1 Mine Planning 133 6.1 Raw Coal Handling 126 8.2 Plant Product Quality 136 6.2 Jig Circuit 127 8.3 Plant Efficiency Analysis 136 6.3 Dense Medium Bath 127 8.3.1. Yield Predictions 136 6.4 Medium Recovery 128 8.3.2. Reject Analysis 137 6.5 Froth Flotation 128 8.3.3. Plant Sampling 137 6.6 Water Clarification 129 8.3.4. Efficiency Testing of 6.7 Tailings Dewatering 130 Washing Units 137 6.8 Clean Coal Handling 131 APPENDICES 139 7. GENERAL INFORMATION 131 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 139 Abstract The Tahmoor mine is located some 80 km south-west of Sydney in the South Western coal mining district of New South Wales. Construction of the Coal Preparation Plant was completed in June 1981. Since this time the plant has processed all run of mine production on a two shift per day basis. The plant is a nominal 300 tonne per hour single module unit. Plant design consists of jig washing and froth flotation of the fines, with the option of dense medium separation if the raw coal quality warrants the production of a middlings product. From an engineering point of view the special features of the Tahmoor Plant are:- 1. The Baum jig has 10 compartments and three elevators. This allows middlings recycling in the third elevator. 2. The Leebar bath was selected because of its capability for a low S.G. cut and its mechanical reliability. 3. The selection of an Enviroclear thickener for tailings thickening. 4. A mechanical tailings dewatering plant which includes a solid bowl centrifuge and a band press filter. Major emphasis is placed on all aspects of quality control and plant efficiency. This is reflected in the con- sistency of product and reliability in operation of the plant. 1. INTRODUCTION B.P. coal australia is a Department of B.P. Australia Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of The British Petroleum Company London. The department is responsible for all B.P. Coal interests within Australia which comprises : Clutha Development Pty. Limited, a fully owned subsidiary and two joint ventures, Clarence Colliery and Winchester South Development. *CluthaDevelopmentPty ,Ltd. *昭 和59年6月13日 本 会 第72回 例 会 に お い て 発 表 **Manager Coal Preparation ,BP Coal Australia Limited 昭 和59年5月10日 受 理 Vo1.31,No.2(,84-夏) (39) 120 W.C.TWEDDLE (40) 浮 選(資 源処理技術) COAL PREPARATION AT TA14MOOR COLLIERY 121 Clutha Development Pty. Limited operates in three areas of New South Wales:•\ 1. The Southern Area: The southern area comprises the Burragorang Valley and Tahmoor Divisions. The Burragorang Valley operates four underground mines with coal preparation facilities at Wollondilly. Tahmoor is an underground mining operation with a coal preparation plant on site. 2. The Northern Area: The Northern Division operates two underground and two open cut mines in the Hunter Valley region of New South Wales. All raw coal is processed at Newdell Coal Preparation Plant. 3. The Western Area: This Division operates two underground mines and one open cut mine in the Lithgow region of New South Wales. The Coal Preparation Plant at Western Main processes all run of mine coal. 2. BACKGROUND INFORMATION The Tahmoor Colliery is located some 80 Km south west of Sydney in the South Western coal mining district of New South Wales. Clutha Development Pty. Limited was granted the initial exploration licence in 1970. Following exploration drilling, a mining proposal was put forward for a complex consisting of two mines, serviced by a central coal preparation plant. Construction commenced in September, 1975, on the Tahmoor East Mine with a drift at the central services site with two vertical shafts on other sites. Production commenced from the mine in September, 1979. Output was limited to 2,000 tonnes per day of raw coal until the washery was completed in June, 1981. Vol. 31, No. 2 ('84-‰Ä) (41) 122 W.C. TWEDDLE 3. MINING OPERATIONS The coal seams in the Tahmoor lease are as follows :- Total Reserves In Situ Bulli 95.6 million tonnes Wongawilli 20.4 million tonnes The Wongawilli reserves are not regarded as currently economic and are excluded from all project proposals. Current production is 1.026 million tonnes per year of raw coal which is mined by board and pillar extraction method from six continuous mining units. TAHMOOR COLLIERY MINE WORKINGS ( 42 ) 浮 選(資 源処理技術) COAL PREPARATION AT TAHMOOR COLLIERY 123 4. RAW COAL QUALITY Raw coal ash has averaged 23% to date. In general terms there is not a large amount of material found in the `middlings' gravity fraction between 1.50 and 1.80. Middlings content varies across the lease from less than 2% up to 10%. In certain parts of the lease jig washing coupled with froth flotation enables product ash speci- fication to be met at cut points in excess of 1.60 R.D. For the bulk of the reserve, however, it is necessary to extract the middlings content at varying cut points down to 1.40 R.D. to meet product specifications. In addition, the large coal fractions (plus 12 mm.) has a higher raw coal ash than the smaller coal fractions (minus 12 mm.) The large coal will also wash to a higher ash at a lower yield com- pared to the small coal. This led to the final selection of a jig as the main processing unit plus a heavy medium bath for washing the large coal from the jig when conditions are appropriate. TAFIMOOR COLLIERY CHANNEL SAMPLE SS 51 Location 202 Panel, 1OM A3 to B3 E262590 N. 1210068 Date Sampled : 5th January, 1984. Date Analysed 16th February, 1984. Sampled by I JS. Thickness 2.155 M Sample broken up by hand to•\19.05 mm•~0 SIZING ANALYSIS % Weigh t % Ash Size Fraction Cumulative Fraction Cumulative -19 .05•~0.50 mm 92.38 92.38 8.69 8.69 -0 .50 mm•~0 7.62 100.00 7.11 8.57 FLOAT AND SINK ANALYSIS OF -19.05x 0.50 MM SIZE FRACTION Vo1.31,No.2(,84-夏) (43) 124 W.C. TWEDDLE FLOAT AND SINK ANALYSIS OF•\0.50 MM•~0 SIZE FRACTION PRODUCT SPECIFICATION (Air Dried Basis) •\ Coking Coal •\Steaming Coal Ash 8.5% Ash (Nominal) 15.0% Inherent Moisture 1.5% Inherent Moisture 1.1% Volatile Matter (Nominal) 28.0% Volatile Matter (Nominal) 24.0% Fixed Carbon (Nominal) 62.0% Fixed Carbon (Nominal) 60.0% Crucible Swelling Number (Nominal) 5%-6 Specific Energy (Nominal) 29.OMJ/kg. Total Moisture (Maximum) 8.0% Total Sulphur (Maximum) 0.4% 5. DESIGN CONCEPT The coal preparation plant is a nominal 300 tonnes per hour single module. The plant was constructed by Bulk Materials (Coal Handling) Services Pty. Limited. With regard to the modular design of the plant consideration was given in design to the future requirements of additional washing capacity. Options are available to install an additional module which would only require a jig coupled with associated flotation equipment. An allowance has been made for the future addition (44) 浮 選(資 源処理技術) COAL PREPARATION AT TAHMOOR COLLIERY 125 of a dense medium cyclone section should it become necessary to produce a lower coking coal ash product. In general building layout, a concept of relatively low profile design has been achieved by the use of internal conveyors. In obtaining this, a gravity flow situation has been maintained throughout the various process sections with minimum pumping of solids. TAHMOOR COAL PREPARATION PLANT SOLIDS FLOW DIAGRAM TAHMOOR COAL PREPARATION PLANT EQUIPMENT FLOWSHEET Vo1.31,No.2('84-夏) (45) 126 W.C. TWEDDLE The plant is basically a jig and flotation plant with the option of dense medium separation of the coarse material. All run of mine feed is initially treated in a jig for removal of heavy reject material. The product after screening reports either directly to the coking coal conveyor or the plus 12 mm. material goes to a dense medium bath for further separation, if necessary. In the bath section a middlings product is removed and following crushing to 50 mm. is collected for discharge from the plant. The balance of the coking coal from the bath is screened at 50/13 mm. before the plus 50 mm. coal is crushed and the minus 13 mm. material joins the centrifuge feed. Should the total coarse material be of acceptable coking quality, provision is made to by-pass the bath completely, with the coarse product, following screening and crushing, discharging direct to the coking coal conveyor. The minus 0.5 mm. is collected from the jig water circuit for treatment by froth flotation. The recovered product from the drum filters discharges onto the coking coal conveyor. The flotation tailings after thickening are pumped to the tailings treatment plant. 6. PROCESS DESCRIPTION 6.1 Raw Coal Handling All raw coal is transferred from the underground bins by a 1.1 metre steel cord conveyor. The run of mine feed is scalped on a vibrating screen to remove all plus 150 mm. stone. The minus 150 mm. material is conveyed to the emergency stockpile area or is screened over a divergator before storage in two 1250 tonne concrete bins. The divergator sizes the coal at 25 mm.
Recommended publications
  • 278 Subpart B—Coal Preparation Plants and Coal Preparation Plant
    § 434.20 40 CFR Ch. I (7–1–16 Edition) treat coal rine drainage, coal prepara- ration plants and coal preparation tion plant process wastewater, or plant association areas, as indicated, drainage from coal preparation plant including discharges which are associated areas, which remove pollut- pumped, siphoned, or drained from the ants regulated by this part from such coal preparation plant water circuit waters. This includes all pipes, chan- and coal storage, refuse storage, and nels, ponds, basins, tanks and all other ancillary areas related to the cleaning equipment serving such structures. or beneficiation of coal of any rank in- (p) The term ‘‘coal refuse disposal cluding, but not limited to, bitu- pile’’ means any coal refuse deposited minous, lignite, and anthracite. on the earth and intended as perma- nent dispoal or long-term storage § 434.21 [Reserved] (greater than 180 days) of such mate- rial, but does not include coal refuse § 434.22 Effluent limitation guidelines deposited within the active mining representing the degree of effluent area or coal refuse never removed from reduction attainable by the applica- tion of the best practicable control the active mining area. technology currently available (q) The term ‘‘controlled surface (BPT). mine drainage’’ means any surface mine drainage that is pumped or si- (a) Except as provided in 40 CFR phoned from the active mining area. 125.30–125.32, 40 CFR 401.17, and §§ 434.61, (r) The term ‘‘abandoned mine’’ 434.62 and 434.63 of this part, the fol- means a mine where mining operations
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Water Quality on Coal Thermoplasticity Feng Zhang
    Effect of water quality on coal thermoplasticity Feng Zhang A thesis in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Philosophy in Engineering School of Minerals and Energy Resources Engineering Faculty of Engineering June 2018 II III Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisors Associate Professor Seher Ata and Dr. Ghislain Bournival for their support, guidance and encouragement throughout my research study. I am especially grateful to Seher, who was the supervisor of my undergraduate thesis, for trusting my ability to complete this research degree. Special thanks to Professor Alan Buckley for his help with my understanding on coal surface chemistry and surface analysis. Also, many thanks to Mr. Noel Lambert, for providing valuable information related to this research topic, as well as preparing and transporting the coal and process water samples. I appreciate Dr. Bin Gong, Dr. Yin Yao for their help with the XPS analysis and SEM analysis. I would like to thank Australian Coal Association Research Program (ACARP) for funding this research project and providing the coal and process water samples. Lastly, thanks to my family and friends, especially to my girlfriend, Hongni Yin, for their endless support throughout these two years. IV Abstract Process water reuse is a common practice in Australian coal preparation plants. It is an effective solution to on-site water scarcity and to minimize environmental impacts. This study investigates the effect of inorganic mineral salts in the process water on the thermoplastic properties of metallurgical coals after a short period of mild oxidation. Two different Australian metallurgical coals were treated with the process water received from a coal preparation plant based in Queensland, AU, and exposed to air at ambient temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dirty Secrets of Coal Cleaning: Pollution and Enforcement Options At
    The Dirty Secrets of Coal Cleaning: Pollution and Enforcement Options at Pennsylvania Coal Preparation Plants October 14, 2014 The Environmental Integrity Project • Lisa Widawsky Hallowell Grant funding was made possible through the Foundation for Pennsylvania Watersheds (FPW), and is intended to support Clear Water Conservancy’s work in advancing the quality of our environment. FPW is a nonprofit, grant-making organization supporting water quality needs throughout Pennsylvania. Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 2 II. OVERVIEW OF COAL PREP PLANT PERMITS ............................................................... 4 III. ANALYSIS: WATER POLLUTION .................................................................................. 5 A. Summary of Laws Related to Releases to Water and Land ............................................. 6 1. The Clean Water Act .................................................................................................... 6 2. Other Laws Requiring Disclosure of Chemicals and Releases .................................... 9 B. Storage of Large Volumes of Chemicals at Coal Preparation Plants ............................. 10 C. Incomplete Permit Applications that Fail to Disclose Metals and other Coal Pollutants in Permit Applications .............................................................................................................. 12 D. No Limits for Metals or Coal Cleaning Pollutants Commonly
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Abstract Booklet
    TWENTY - FIFTH ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL PITTSBURGH COAL CONFERENCE COAL - ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT ABSTRACTS BOOKLET September 29 - October 2, 2008 The Westin Convention Center Pittsburgh, PA USA The Westin Hotel and Convention Center Hosted By: University of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engineering A NOTE TO THE READER This Abstracts Booklet is prepared solely as a convenient reference for the Conference participants. Abstracts are arranged in a numerical order of the oral and poster sessions as published in the Final Conference Program. In order to facilitate the task for the reader to locate a specific abstract in a given session, each paper is given two numbers: the first designates the session number and the second represents the paper number in that session. For example, Paper No. 25-1 is the first paper to be presented in the Oral Session #25. Similarly, Paper No. P3-1 is the first paper to appear in the Poster Session #3. It should be cautioned that this Abstracts Booklet is prepared based on the original abstract that was submitted, unless the author noted an abstract change. The contents of the Booklet do not reflect late changes made by the authors for their presentations at the Conference. The reader should consult the Final Conference Program for any such changes. Furthermore, updated and detailed full manuscripts are published in the CD-ROM Conference Proceedings will be sent to all registered participants following the Conference. On behalf of the Twenty-Fifth Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, we wish to express our sincere appreciation to Ms. Heidi M. Aufdenkamp, Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • COAL CONFERENCE University of Pittsburgh · Swanson School of Engineering ABSTRACTS BOOKLET
    Thirty-Fifth Annual INTERNATIONAL PITTSBURGH COAL CONFERENCE University of Pittsburgh · Swanson School of Engineering ABSTRACTS BOOKLET Clean Coal-based Energy/Fuels and the Environment October 15-18, 2018 New Century Grand Hotel Xuzhou Hosted by: The conference acknowledges the support of Co-hosted by: K. C. Wong Education Foundation, Hong Kong A NOTE TO THE READER This Abstracts Booklet is prepared solely as a convenient reference for the Conference participants. Abstracts are arranged in a numerical order of the oral and poster sessions as published in the Final Conference Program. In order to facilitate the task for the reader to locate a specific abstract in a given session, each paper is given two numbers: the first designates the session number and the second represents the paper number in that session. For example, Paper No. 25.1 is the first paper to be presented in the Oral Session #25. Similarly, Paper No. P3.1 is the first paper to appear in the Poster Session #3. It should be cautioned that this Abstracts Booklet is prepared based on the original abstracts that were submitted, unless the author noted an abstract change. The contents of the Booklet do not reflect late changes made by the authors for their presentations at the Conference. The reader should consult the Final Conference Program for any such changes. Furthermore, updated and detailed full manuscripts, published in the Conference Proceedings, will be sent to all registered participants following the Conference. On behalf of the Thirty-Fifth Annual International Pittsburgh Coal Conference, we wish to express our sincere appreciation and gratitude to Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Energy Uses of Coal
    CCC/ 291 NOVEMBER 2018 NON-ENERGY USES OF COAL DR IAN REID NON-ENERGY USES OF COAL IEA CLEAN COAL CENTR E APSLEY HOUSE, 176 UPPER RICHMOND R OAD LONDON, SW15 2SH UNITED KINGDOM +44[0]20 3905 3870 WWW.IEA-COAL.ORG AUTHOR DR IAN REID IEA CCC REPORT NUMBER CCC/291 ISBN 978–92–9029–614–0 © IEA CLEAN COAL CENTRE PUBLICATION DATE NOVEMBER 2018 3 IEA CLEAN COAL CENTR E – NON-ENERGY USES OF C OAL PREFACE This report has been produced by the IEA Clean Coal Centre and is based on a survey and analysis of published literature, and on information gathered in discussions with interested organisations and individuals. Their assistance is gratefully acknowledged. It should be understood that the views expressed in this report are our own, and are not necessarily shared by those who supplied the information, nor by our member organisations. The IEA Clean Coal Centre was established in 1975 and has contracting parties and sponsors from: Australia, China, the European Commission, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Poland, Russia, South Africa, Thailand, the UAE, the UK and the USA. The overall objective of the IEA Clean Coal Centre is to continue to provide our members, the IEA Working Party on Fossil Fuels and other interested parties with independent information and analysis on all coal-related trends compatible with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. We consider all aspects of coal production, transport, processing and utilisation, within the rationale for balancing security of supply, affordability and environmental issues. These include efficiency improvements, lowering greenhouse and non-greenhouse gas emissions, reducing water stress, financial resourcing, market issues, technology development and deployment, ensuring poverty alleviation through universal access to electricity, sustainability, and social licence to operate.
    [Show full text]
  • Muswellbrook Coal Company Limited
    Muswellbrook Coal Company Limited Annual Environmental Management Report 1 July 2011 to 30 June 2012 Muswellbrook Coal Company Limited CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Consents, Lease and Licences ................................................................................ 2 1.1.1 Development Consents ................................................................................................... 2 1.1.2 Mining Leases .................................................................................................................. 2 1.1.3 Licenses ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.4 Mining Operation Plan ..................................................................................................... 3 1.1.5 Environmental Management Plans 5-year Review ......................................................... 3 1.2 Mine Contacts .......................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Inspection by Department of Industry and Investment NSW (DTIRIS) ...................... 4 2 OPERATIONS DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD .................................................... 4 2.1 Exploration ............................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Land Preparation .....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THE CHALLENGE of COAL PREPARATION by Anthony G
    THE CHALLENGE OF COAL PREPARATION By Anthony G. Fonseca Director, Coal Utilization, CONSOL Inc. Library, Pennsylvania ABSTRACT About 45-50% of the coal mined in the U.S. passes through coal preparation plants; east of the Mississippi River this number increases to about 75-80%. Although the cost for coal preparation is worthwhile to some, the coal industry faces the challenges of continuing downward pressure on the price of coal and the impact of new environmental regulations. Coal preparation, as commercially practiced today, is an effective process achieving 75-80% ash reduction, 15-80% trace element reduction, and 85-90% Btu recovery; it is less effective for pyrite reduction (35-70%), and on-line operating time (40-60%), and suffers from obsolete control systems. Methods will be discussed for reducing costs of coal preparation and improving the performance of coal preparation plants. Comments are included on equipment selection, especially for –28 mesh coal, and prep plant operation and control practices. Btu recovery ash and pyrite reduction, fines processing including dewatering and slurry fuel use options are emphasized. Trace element removal and expert control systems for maximization of prep plan operation also will be highlighted. INTRODUCTION Coal preparation is the practice whereby raw coal is modified to a more preferred form to enable its utilization. The methods employed to achieve this preferred modification need to be cost-effective, while also being appropriate to the raw coal, the scale of production and the ultimate end user requirements. Since the cost of coal preparation is a measurable part of mine construction and mine operation, any improvement in the process, any efficiency gain or cost reduction obtained, and any improvements in coal product compatibility to end user requirements achieved, are looked on favorably if or when the product is profitably marketed.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines for Coal Processing
    Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines COAL PROCESSING WORLD BANK GROUP Environmental, Health and Safety Guidelines for Coal Processing Introduction such as host country context, assimilative capacity of the environment, and other project factors, are taken into account. The Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) Guidelines are The applicability of specific technical recommendations should technical reference documents with general and industry- be based on the professional opinion of qualified and specific examples of Good International Industry Practice experienced persons. When host country regulations differ 1 (GIIP) . When one or more members of the World Bank Group from the levels and measures presented in the EHS are involved in a project, these EHS Guidelines are applied as Guidelines, projects are expected to achieve whichever is more required by their respective policies and standards. These stringent. If less stringent levels or measures than those industry sector EHS guidelines are designed to be used provided in these EHS Guidelines are appropriate, in view of together with the General EHS Guidelines document, which specific project circumstances, a full and detailed justification provides guidance to users on common EHS issues potentially for any proposed alternatives is needed as part of the site- applicable to all industry sectors. For complex projects, use of specific environmental assessment. This justification should multiple industry-sector guidelines may be necessary. A demonstrate that the choice for any alternate performance complete list of industry-sector guidelines can be found at: levels is protective of human health and the environment www.ifc.org/ifcext/enviro.nsf/Content/EnvironmentalGuidelines Applicability The EHS Guidelines contain the performance levels and measures that are generally considered to be achievable in The EHS Guidelines for Coal Processing cover the processing new facilities by existing technology at reasonable costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Coal Mining Weir International, Inc
    INTRODUCTION TO COAL MINING WEIR INTERNATIONAL, INC. HISTORY OF COAL IN THE UNITED STATES . Coal was one of man’s earliest sources of heat and light . Coal was first discovered in the United States along the Illinois River in the 1670s . First commercial mining occurred near Richmond, Virginia in 1750 . Between 1850 to 1950, coal was the most important energy fuel in the country . Today, coal accounts for more than half of the electric power generation . Coal is also critical for supplying coke for the nation’s steel industry ORIGIN OF COAL . Most of the coal was formed about 300 million years ago . Remains of vegetation sank to the bottom of swamps, forming a soggy, dense material called peat . Deposits of sand, clay and other mineral matter buried the peat . Increasing pressure from deeper burial and heat gradually transformed the peat into coal . The formation of one foot of coal requires an estimated three to seven feet of compacted plant matter TYPES OF COAL . Coal is classified in four general categories or “ranks”: Anthracite Increasing rank Bituminous Increasing carbon content Sub-bituminous Lignite Increasing heating value . The ranking of coal is based primarily on its carbon content and calorific value . The amount of energy in coal is measured in British Thermal Unit (Btu) per pound . Approximately 90% of the coal in the US is in the bituminous or sub-bituminous category MINING METHODS Surface Mining Underground Mining . Surface mining is: . Underground mining is typically employed where surface mining is not economical Generally the least expensive and most productive mining method to extract coal .
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of a Coal Preparation Plant. Part 1. Changes in Water Quality
    1 Analysis of a coal preparation plant. Part 2 1. Changes in water quality, coal seam, 3 and plant performance 4 5 Ghislain Bournival 1, Masataka Yoshida 1,3, Nicholas Cox 2, Noel Lambert 2, Seher Ata 1* 6 7 1 School of Minerals and Energy Resources Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 8 NSW, 2052, Australia 9 2 Clean Process Technologies Pty Ltd, 700 Standen Drive, Lower Belford, NSW, 2335, Australia 10 3 Mitsubishi Development Pty Ltd, Level 16, 480 Queen Street, Brisbane, QLD, 4000, Australia 11 * To whom correspondence should be addressed 12 Email: [email protected] 13 14 15 1 16 Abstract 17 Coal preparation plants are under increasing pressure to reduce their consumption of fresh water 18 leading to the use of recycle water. Recycled water generally contains a large quantity of dissolved 19 inorganic electrolytes, which affect coal flotation. This paper reports the conductivity and pH 20 measurements of water in tailings stream of an industrial scale flotation cell covering a period of 21 approximately two years. The different coal seams processed at the site were also compared and the 22 influence the water quality on the overall yield of coal assessed. This study presents the large 23 variation in inorganic content in recycled water observed for a wash plant and determine its possible 24 effect on coal preparation. The maximum daily temperature was found be an important factor 25 controlling the amount of inorganic electrolytes in the water and, very significantly, the water 26 management system implemented. The overall plant performance was not significantly affected by the 27 use of water containing high concentrations of inorganic electrolytes.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania Active Bituminous Coal Mining Permits - April 2016
    Pennsylvania Active Bituminous Coal Mining Permits - April 2016 Primary Facility Kind County Municipality Mine Name Permit # Mailing Name Address1 Address2 City State Zip Code Telephone GFCC Allegheny Collier MCHUGH RES ESTATES 02-03-02 COLLIER LAND & COAL DEV LP C/O GULF COMPANIES 1 8TH ST BRADDOCK PA 15104-1960 (412) 271-4281 GFCC Centre Rush RIDGE GFCC 14-07-01 JUNIOR COAL CONTR INC 2330 SIX MILE RD NULL PHILIPSBURG PA 16866-8203 (814) 342-2012 GFCC Centre Snow Shoe CONTRARY GFCC 14-12-01A WAROQUIER COAL CO PO BOX 128 NULL CLEARFIELD PA 16830-0128 (814) 765-5681 GFCC Clearfield Knox BLOOM A GFCC 17-09-03A EARTHMOVERS UNLTD INC PO BOX 187 NULL KYLERTOWN PA 16847-0187 (814) 345-6010 GFCC Clearfield Woodward PACIFIC GFCC 17-09-04 FINNEY ENTERPRISES INC PO BOX 121 NULL BRISBIN PA 16620-0121 NULL GFCC Clearfield Sandy WEST SLAB RUN 17-13-02 P & N COAL CO INC PO BOX 332 NULL PUNXSUTAWNEY PA 15767-0332 (814) 938-7660 GFCC Clearfield Decatur CRITTENDEN GFCC 17-13-03 STRISHOCK LLC PO BOX 1006 NULL DU BOIS PA 15801-1006 (814) 372-1090 GFCC Elk Jay CALEDONIA 1 MINE 24-05-02 TAMBURLIN BROS COAL CO INC PO BOX 1419 NULL CLEARFIELD PA 16830-5419 (814) 765-5681 GFCC Elk Jay SHAFFER HOLLOW RECLAMATION PROJ 24-08-03 TAMBURLIN BROS COAL CO INC PO BOX 1419 NULL CLEARFIELD PA 16830-5419 (814) 765-5681 GFCC Fayette Franklin MCCRACKEN GFCC 26-13-01 FAYETTE COAL & COKE INC 195 ENTERPRISE LN NULL CONNELLSVILLE PA 15425-6617 (724) 628-8408 GFCC Fayette North Union COOLSPRING GFCC SITE 26-06-09 ROBERT J MCGILL 166 SMOCK RD NULL SMOCK PA 15480-2008 (724) 880-7145
    [Show full text]