DOCSLIB.ORG

War Text Final

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
War Text Final An Air Force Association Special Report How the world conflict transformed America’s air and space weapon The Air Force Association The Air Force Association (AFA) is an independent, nonprofit civilian organi- zation promoting public understanding of aerospace power and the pivotal role it plays in the security of the nation. AFA publishes Air Force Magazine, sponsors national symposia, and disseminates information through outreach programs of its affiliate, the Aerospace Education Foundation. Learn more about AFA by visiting us on the Web at www.afa.org. The Aerospace Education Foundation The Aerospace Education Foundation (AEF) is dedicated to ensuring Ameri- ca’s aerospace excellence through education, scholarships, grants, awards, and public awareness programs. The Foundation also publishes a series of studies and forums on aerospace and national security. The Eaker Institute is the public policy and research arm of AEF. AEF works through a network of thou- sands of Air Force Association mem- bers and more than 200 chapters to distribute educational material to schools and concerned citizens. An example of this includes "Visions of Exploration," an AEF/USA Today multi- disciplinary science, math, and social studies program. To find out how you can support aerospace excellence visit us on the Web at www.aef.org. © 2005 The Air Force Association Published by Aerospace Education Foundation 1501 Lee Highway Arlington VA 22209-1198 Tel: (703) 247-5839 Produced by the staff of Air Force Magazine Fax: (703) 247-5853 Design by Heather Lewis, Assistant Art Director The War of 9/11 1 How the world conflict transformed America’s air and space weapon By Dr. Rebecca Grant Dr. Rebecca Grant is president of IRIS Independent Research, Inc., in Washing- ton, D.C., and a fellow of the Eaker Insti- tute for Aerospace Concepts, the public policy and research arm of the Air Force Association’s Aerospace Education Foun- dation. She is also a contributing editor to Air Force Magazine, the journal of the Air Force Association. Her professional re- search interests center on joint doctrine and airpower employment in joint campaigns. An Air Force Association Special Report February 2005 2 Table of Contents Prologue: This New War 3 Operation Enduring Freedom 4 Prior Planning 4 Major Combat Begins 5 The Tide Turns 10 Anaconda 12 Operation Noble Eagle 15 Creating a Strategy 15 Box: The Foundation: the Air Force’s Strategic Air Mobility Forces 16-17 Permanent Commitment 18 Operation Iraqi Freedom 21 Southern Focus 21 War Councils 23 Major Combat Operations 26 The Sandstorm 30 The “Phase IV” Fight 34 Theater of Mobility 34 Afghan Mop-Up 35 The Iraqi Nettle 36 The Fallujah Model 40 Tying It Together 42 What Airpower Wrought 42 Beyond Jointness 43 Seeking a Course 44 Maps Southwest Asia 6 The Afghan Theater 8 The Gulf Region 22 Iraq in Detail 24 Tables Total Coalition Aircraft 25 Combat Aircraft 28 Support Aircraft 28 Air Mobility Sorties 29 Strike Sorties 31 Strikes by Category 33 Total Air Sorties 33 Snapshot of Phase IV Air Operations 41 Prologue 3 This New War On Sept. 11, 2001, at 0846, al Qaeda hijack- the skies over the cities, fields, and mountains ers flew American Airlines Flight 11 into the north of America. tower of the World Trade Center in New York City. It is a war with American leadership, and yet The first response in the global war on terrorism it is also a coalition war. The flags of more than fell to two F-15 pilots sitting alert that bright, clear 60 nations can be found at US Central Com- morning. A new defense of America had be- mand (CENTCOM) headquarters at MacDill gun—and with it, a new era of challenge for air AFB, Fla. They are represented by their soldiers, and space power. special operations forces, warships, aircraft, When one thinks of the war on terrorism that and supplies abroad. It is a war to prevent more began after Sept. 11, individual actions come terrorist disasters of the kind seen in Bali and to mind: Operation Enduring Freedom, Opera- Madrid as well as in New York, Pennsylvania, tion Noble Eagle, Operation Iraqi Freedom, and and Washington, D.C. so-called “Phase IV” stability operations in both This new war—The War of 9/11—has had Afghanistan and Iraq. many successes, but also setbacks, and it has Yet the series of campaigns and battles that been a time of soul-searching. It is the war to were launched after Sept. 11 are military actions shape the character of the early 21st century. in support of a single purpose. It is a war fought Airmen are playing a leading role in this war on many fronts, at home and abroad. To those as they did in the wars of the 20th century. New in the armed forces and those millions more who tactics and operational concepts in air and support and care for them, it is a war of vivid, space power pioneered and perfected for this unexpected places. There are the snow-capped war have altered the fighting style of joint mili- mountains of Afghanistan, the dun-colored cit- tary forces. ies of Iraq, the dark blue waters of the North Ara- The war has had four distinct phases—thus bian Sea, the heavily guarded desert bases in far. With the war now in its fourth year, this es- the Gulf, the enclave of Djibouti in the Horn of say attempts to describe, explain, and analyze Africa. The war is waged from Cheyenne the role played by air and space power in each Mountain’s command post in Colorado and in of these phases. Long after the attack, the ruins of the World Trade Center still smolder. The Sept. 11 attacks killed more than 3,000 from the US and other countries. US Navy Photo by J01 Preston Keres 4 Operation Enduring Freedom Within hours of the disasters at the World the idea of relying on airpower and a small con- Trade Center in New York and Pentagon in Wash- tingent of Special Operations Forces (SOF) to ington, war planning was underway in the United go after bin Laden and al Qaeda in Afghani- States. The first target of American arms was stan. “After we didn’t get Osama bin Laden in the terror-prone regime in Afghanistan, which TLAM strikes in Afghanistan, we started this had been providing safe haven and support for game of trying to follow Osama around Afghani- Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda terrorists. stan and trying to figure out how to get a shot Going after bin Laden’s main base was no easy at him,” recalled one top CENTCOM officer.4 The task. Nor was reliance on airpower the immedi- US began developing contingency plans “to get ate choice of Army Gen. Tommy R. Franks, the Osama, or go in there and bust up the Taliban.” CENTCOM chief. Submarines were on station in the North Ara- The commander’s first instinct was to plan for bian Sea to conduct a TLAM strike if bin Laden 5 1.Gen. Tommy Franks, USA a multi-pronged land attack relying on helicop- turned up. However, actionable intelligence (Ret.), American Soldier, p. ter airborne assault, with Pakistan as a staging never came through, and the whole idea re- 250-51. area. “I can’t see conducting operations inside minded some of Desert One, the disastrous 2. Rear Adm. James Robb, Afghanistan without basing, staging, and over- 1980 attempt to rescue 56 Americans held hos- interview, Aug. 30, 2004. flight support from Pakistan,” he told his staff on tage in the US embassy in Tehran. That failed 3. Franks, American Soldier, Sept. 12.1 There was, however, a problem. “We effort resulted in the deaths of five airmen and p. 250-251. had no air bases on that soil or even near that three marines. 4. Vice Adm. David Nichols, interview, Oct. 13, 2004. soil,” said Rear Adm. James Robb, inbound as The SOF and airpower option was more ap- 2 5. President Bill Clinton, My CENTCOM’s chief of strategic plans and policy. pealing in 2001—in part because air and space Life, p. 891. Franks asked Secretary of Defense Donald H. power had progressed, and in part because 6. Cesar G. Soriano, “Pilots Rumsfeld for 10 days to develop a course of Washington would not wait for a massive Continue Mission to Destroy action. “We had al Qaeda and Taliban target sets buildup and a ground campaign. A hard look Taliban Targets,” USA Today, Oct. 15, 2001. in Afghanistan and plans to strike those targets at the real tactical options showed that it was with TLAMs [the Navy’s Tomahawk land-attack the air component that was ready to go. B-2 cruise missiles] and manned bombers,” Franks bomber crews at Whiteman AFB, Mo., went into recalled, “but CENTCOM had not developed a crew rest soon after they got word of the Sept. plan for conventional ground operations in Af- 11 attacks. The Navy’s aircraft carrier USS En- ghanistan” or for access agreements with bor- terprise was close to the scene of action. “I was dering nations.3 watching CNN when I saw the second plane hit the tower,” said Navy Capt. Sandy Winnefeld, Prior Planning commanding officer.6 “Right then I thought, In 1998, CENTCOM planners had toyed with ‘We’re not going home.’” That was true. “It was Four B-52H bombers taxi for take off on strike mission against al Qaeda terrorist training camps and Taliban military installations in Afghanistan on Oct. 7, 2001, the beginning of Operation Enduring USAF photo by SrA.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Politics of Security in Ninewa: Preventing an ISIS Resurgence in Northern Iraq
    The Politics of Security in Ninewa: Preventing an ISIS Resurgence in Northern Iraq Julie Ahn—Maeve Campbell—Pete Knoetgen Client: Office of Iraq Affairs, U.S. Department of State Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Advisor: Meghan O’Sullivan Policy Analysis Exercise Seminar Leader: Matthew Bunn May 7, 2018 This Policy Analysis Exercise reflects the views of the authors and should not be viewed as representing the views of the US Government, nor those of Harvard University or any of its faculty. Acknowledgements We would like to express our gratitude to the many people who helped us throughout the development, research, and drafting of this report. Our field work in Iraq would not have been possible without the help of Sherzad Khidhir. His willingness to connect us with in-country stakeholders significantly contributed to the breadth of our interviews. Those interviews were made possible by our fantastic translators, Lezan, Ehsan, and Younis, who ensured that we could capture critical information and the nuance of discussions. We also greatly appreciated the willingness of U.S. State Department officials, the soldiers of Operation Inherent Resolve, and our many other interview participants to provide us with their time and insights. Thanks to their assistance, we were able to gain a better grasp of this immensely complex topic. Throughout our research, we benefitted from consultations with numerous Harvard Kennedy School (HKS) faculty, as well as with individuals from the larger Harvard community. We would especially like to thank Harvard Business School Professor Kristin Fabbe and Razzaq al-Saiedi from the Harvard Humanitarian Initiative who both provided critical support to our project.
    [Show full text]
  • The Air Force and the Cold
    THE AIR FORCE A N D T H E COLD WA R A P I C T O R I A L H I S T O RY COVER AIR FORCE ASSOCIATION The Air Force and the Cold War 1 The Air Force Association THE AIR FORCE The Air Force Association (AFA) is an independent, nonprofit civilian organization A N D T H E promoting public understanding of aerospace power and the pivotal role it plays in the se- curity of the nation. AFA publishes Air Force Magazine, sponsors national symposia, and disseminates information through outreach programs of its affiliate, the Aerospace Educa- tion Foundation. Learn more about AFA by visiting us on the Web at www.afa.org. COLD WA R The Aerospace Education Foundation The Aerospace Education Foundation (AEF) is dedicated to ensuring America’s aerospace excellence through education, schol- arships, grants, awards, and public awareness programs. The foundation also publishes a series of studies and forums on aerospace and national security. The Eaker Institute is the public policy and research arm of AEF. AEF works through a network of thousands of Air Force Association members and more than 200 chapters to distribute educational material to schools and concerned citizens. An example of this includes “Visions of Exploration,” an AEF/USA Today multidis- ciplinary science, math, and social studies program. To find out how you can support aerospace excellence, visit us on the Web at www.aef.org. © 2005 The Air Force Association Published by Aerospace Education Foundation 1501 Lee Highway Arlington VA 22209-1198 Tel: (703) 247-5839 Produced by the staff of Air Force Magazine Fax: (703) 247-5853 Design by Darcy Harris THE AIR FORCE A N D T H E COLD WA R A P I C T O R I A L H I S T O RY AIR FORCE ASSOCIATION DECEMBER 2005 By John T.
    [Show full text]
  • Chasing Success
    AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE Chasing Success Air Force Efforts to Reduce Civilian Harm Sarah B. Sewall Air University Press Air Force Research Institute Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Project Editor Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dr. Ernest Allan Rockwell Sewall, Sarah B. Copy Editor Carolyn Burns Chasing success : Air Force efforts to reduce civilian harm / Sarah B. Sewall. Cover Art, Book Design and Illustrations pages cm L. Susan Fair ISBN 978-1-58566-256-2 Composition and Prepress Production 1. Air power—United States—Government policy. Nedra O. Looney 2. United States. Air Force—Rules and practice. 3. Civilian war casualties—Prevention. 4. Civilian Print Preparation and Distribution Diane Clark war casualties—Government policy—United States. 5. Combatants and noncombatants (International law)—History. 6. War victims—Moral and ethical aspects. 7. Harm reduction—Government policy— United States. 8. United States—Military policy— Moral and ethical aspects. I. Title. II. Title: Air Force efforts to reduce civilian harm. UG633.S38 2015 358.4’03—dc23 2015026952 AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS Director and Publisher Allen G. Peck Published by Air University Press in March 2016 Editor in Chief Oreste M. Johnson Managing Editor Demorah Hayes Design and Production Manager Cheryl King Air University Press 155 N. Twining St., Bldg. 693 Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-6026 [email protected] http://aupress.au.af.mil/ http://afri.au.af.mil/ Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the organizations with which they are associated or the views of the Air Force Research Institute, Air University, United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or any AFRI other US government agency.
    [Show full text]
  • US Military Policy in the Middle East an Appraisal US Military Policy in the Middle East: an Appraisal
    Research Paper Micah Zenko US and Americas Programme | October 2018 US Military Policy in the Middle East An Appraisal US Military Policy in the Middle East: An Appraisal Contents Summary 2 1 Introduction 3 2 Domestic Academic and Political Debates 7 3 Enduring and Current Presence 11 4 Security Cooperation: Training, Advice and Weapons Sales 21 5 Military Policy Objectives in the Middle East 27 Conclusion 31 About the Author 33 Acknowledgments 34 1 | Chatham House US Military Policy in the Middle East: An Appraisal Summary • Despite significant financial expenditure and thousands of lives lost, the American military presence in the Middle East retains bipartisan US support and incurs remarkably little oversight or public debate. Key US activities in the region consist of weapons sales to allied governments, military-to-military training programmes, counterterrorism operations and long-term troop deployments. • The US military presence in the Middle East is the culmination of a common bargain with Middle Eastern governments: security cooperation and military assistance in exchange for US access to military bases in the region. As a result, the US has substantial influence in the Middle East and can project military power quickly. However, working with partners whose interests sometimes conflict with one another has occasionally harmed long-term US objectives. • Since 1980, when President Carter remarked that outside intervention in the interests of the US in the Middle East would be ‘repelled by any means necessary’, the US has maintained a permanent and significant military presence in the region. • Two main schools of thought – ‘offshore balancing’ and ‘forward engagement’ – characterize the debate over the US presence in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Reporting ISIS
    Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy Discussion Paper Series #D-101, July 2016 The Pen and the Sword: Reporting ISIS By Paul Wood Joan Shorenstein Fellow, Fall 2015 BBC Middle East Correspondent Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. May 2013: The kidnapping started slowly. 1 At first, it did not feel like a kidnapping at all. Daniel Rye delivered himself to the hostage-takers quite willingly. He was 24 years old, a freelance photographer from Denmark, and he had gone to the small town of Azaz in northern Syria. His translator, a local woman, said they should get permission to work. So on the morning of his second day in Azaz, only his second ever in Syria, they went to see one of the town’s rebel groups. He knocked at the metal gate to a compound. It was opened by a boy of 11 or 12 with a Kalashnikov slung over his shoulder. “We’ve come to see the emir,” said his translator, using the word – “prince” – that Islamist groups have for their commanders. The boy nodded at them to wait. Daniel was tall, with crew-cut blonde hair. His translator, a woman in her 20s with a hijab, looked small next to him. The emir came with some of his men. He spoke to Daniel and the translator, watched by the boy with the Kalashnikov. The emir looked through the pictures on Daniel’s camera, squinting. There were images of children playing on the burnt-out carcass of a tank. It was half buried under rubble from a collapsed mosque, huge square blocks of stone like a giant child’s toy.
    [Show full text]
  • General Files Series, 1932-75
    GENERAL FILE SERIES Table of Contents Subseries Box Numbers Subseries Box Numbers Annual Files Annual Files 1933-36 1-3 1957 82-91 1937 3-4 1958 91-100 1938 4-5 1959 100-110 1939 5-7 1960 110-120 1940 7-9 1961 120-130 1941 9-10 1962 130-140 1942-43 10 1963 140-150 1946 10 1964 150-160 1947 11 1965 160-168 1948 11-12 1966 168-175 1949 13-23 1967 176-185 1950-53 24-53 Social File 186-201 1954 54-63 Subject File 202-238 1955 64-76 Foreign File 239-255 1956 76-82 Special File 255-263 JACQUELINE COCHRAN PAPERS GENERAL FILES SERIES CONTAINER LIST Box No. Contents Subseries I: Annual Files Sub-subseries 1: 1933-36 Files 1 Correspondence (Misc. planes) (1)(2) [Miscellaneous Correspondence 1933-36] [memo re JC’s crash at Indianapolis] [Financial Records 1934-35] (1)-(10) [maintenance of JC’s airplanes; arrangements for London - Melbourne race] Granville, Miller & DeLackner 1934 (1)-(7) 2 Granville, Miller & DeLackner 1935 (1)(2) Edmund Jakobi 1934 Re: G.B. Plane Return from England Just, G.W. 1934 Leonard, Royal (Harlan Hull) 1934 London Flight - General (1)-(12) London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables General (1)-(5) [cable file of Royal Leonard, FBO’s London agent, re preparations for race] 3 London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables Fueling Arrangements London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables Hangar Arrangements London - Melbourne Air Race 1934 Cables Insurance [London - Melbourne Flight Instructions] (1)(2) McLeod, Fred B. [Fred McLeod Correspondence July - August 1934] (1)-(3) Joseph B.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventy-Five Years Of
    75 Years of Action: August 1956 Highlights of AFA’s Storied History The Air Force Association has played a crucial role in support of the U.S. Air Force for 75 years—longer, in fact, than the Air Force has existed as an independent military branch. Today, AFA remains dedicated to its mission to Educate, Advocate, and Support the Air Force, its Airmen, and their families—and to do the same for the new U.S. Space Force, which celebrated its first anniversary in December. September 1951 The Outstanding Airmen of the Here are highlights of AFA’s most notable achievements in The first “USAF Almanac” Year program is born at the Air its first 75 years. appears as the “Anniversary Force Association’s 10th Annual Issue” of Air Force Magazine. National Convention, held in New Orleans. Feb. 4, 1946 AFA is incorporated May in Washington, D.C. Gen. Jimmy 1956 Doolittle is The Air Force elected AFA’s Association first president. Foundation (later renamed the Aerospace Education April 1959 Foundation) is formally AFA’s hosts the World Congress of Flight in Las established. Vegas. It is the first international air show in U.S. history. Some 51 foreign nations participated. Sept. 18, 1947 The United States Air Force is made an March 1967 The Aerospace Education independent military service, as a part of Foundation undertakes “Project Utah” in cooperation with the National Security Act of 1947. the U.S. Office of Education, demonstrating the feasibility of using Air Force technical training July 1946 courses in the Utah public school 1948 system.
    [Show full text]
  • Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations
    S. HRG. 109–130 Senate Hearings Before the Committee on Appropriations Department of Defense Appropriations Fiscal Year 2006 109th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION H.R. 2863 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE NONDEPARTMENTAL WITNESSES Department of Defense Appropriations, 2006 (H.R. 2863) S. HRG. 109–130 DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE APPROPRIATIONS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006 HEARINGS BEFORE A SUBCOMMITTEE OF THE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED NINTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON H.R. 2863 AN ACT MAKING APPROPRIATIONS FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2006, AND FOR OTHER PURPOSES Department of Defense Nondepartmental witnesses Printed for the use of the Committee on Appropriations ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/congress/index.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 99–854 PDF WASHINGTON : 2005 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2250 Mail: Stop SSOP, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS THAD COCHRAN, Mississippi, Chairman TED STEVENS, Alaska ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia ARLEN SPECTER, Pennsylvania DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii PETE V. DOMENICI, New Mexico PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont CHRISTOPHER S. BOND, Missouri TOM HARKIN, Iowa MITCH MCCONNELL, Kentucky BARBARA A. MIKULSKI, Maryland CONRAD BURNS, Montana HARRY REID, Nevada RICHARD C. SHELBY, Alabama HERB KOHL, Wisconsin JUDD GREGG, New Hampshire PATTY MURRAY, Washington ROBERT F. BENNETT, Utah BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota LARRY CRAIG, Idaho DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas RICHARD J. DURBIN, Illinois MIKE DEWINE, Ohio TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota SAM BROWNBACK, Kansas MARY L.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Force Association 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22209-1198 (703) 247-5800 an Independent Non Profit Aerospace Organization
    Air Force Association 1501 Lee Highway, Arlington, Virginia 22209-1198 (703) 247-5800 An Independent Non Profit Aerospace Organization MONROE W. HATCH, JR. Executive Director August 24, 1994 Dr. Martin Harwit Director National Air and Space Museum Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC 20560 Dear Martin: I received your letter of August 23 and was somewhat surprised. While you rightly point out that the Air Force Association has not provided you with a list containing “line-in, line-out” points of criticism on your last two scripts, I believe we have, from the start, provided substantive comments on what is wrong with your current plans – both in private and in public. The problems associated with this exhibit are not simply minor problems of language or technical issues – they are structural and more fundamental in nature, and, to date, they have not been addressed by the museum. While we are pleased that you have received the kind of “line-in, line-out” comments provided by the service historians and others who have undertaken a “technical” review of the script, the issues of context and balance need to be addressed on the “broad” structural and conceptual levels. For instance, you yourself wrote in an April 16 memorandum to your curators that two-thirds of the photos of death and suffering should be removed from section 400. You also said that pictures of American prisoners of war should be included in that section, but the curators apparently ignored your direction in preparing the May 31 script. We have pointed out the overall imbalance in terms of the number of photos in different sections, and have pointed out issues related to context by citing some of the most egregious examples of the underlying theme that the Japanese were victims and the Americans aggressors in World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • GI Special: [email protected] 11.12.04 Print It out (Color Best)
    GI Special: [email protected] 11.12.04 Print it out (color best). Pass it on. GI SPECIAL 2#C20 Homeless military veteran in city park – because it’s a free country. Photo and caption from the I-R-A-Q ( I Remember Another Quagmire ) portfolio of Mike Hastie, U.S. Army Medic, Vietnam 1970-71. (Contact at: ([email protected]) for more examples of this outstanding work. T) IRAQ WAR REPORTS: Falluja: Resistance Counterattacks In Force Heavy Pressure On Perimeter Of Marine Hq, Air Strikes Called In; Attacks In Rear Of U.S. Forces Spreading 11 November 2004 BBC & Aljazeera & November 10, 2004, by Kim Sengupta, Independent Newspapers Ltd. US marines in Falluja have come under sustained attack from several different directions in the headquarters they have set up in the Iraqi city. The BBC's Paul Wood, who is at the scene, said there was sniper fire from four or five points on the horizon. The insurgents may have regrouped, he says, after US-led troops took over large parts of the city. Another BBC correspondent says troops have pulled back from the city hospital, captured on Sunday night. Our correspondent says the US marines have had to call in four air strikes as they came under heavy fire in central Falluja. Insurgents appear to have got to the perimeter of the headquarters, he says. At the same time, a rifle company of marines has been pushing out into the city, going literally house to house to try to clear out the insurgents. But the company came under continuous fire as soon as it left the base.
    [Show full text]
  • Nato's Intervention in Kosovo: the Legal Case For
    NATO’S INTERVENTION IN KOSOVO: THE LEGAL CASE FOR VIOLATING YUGOSLAVIA’S “NATIONAL SOVEREIGNTY” IN THE ABSENCE OF SECURITY COUNCIL APPROVAL Dr. Klinton W. Alexander∗ If a tyrant practices atrocities towards his subjects, which no just man can approve, the right of human social connection is not cut off in such a case . [I]t would follow that others may take up arms for them.1 Hugo Grotius I. INTRODUCTION Since the end of the Cold War, military intervention in the internal affairs of a sovereign state to protect civilians from wholesale slaughter by their own government has become the norm rather than the exception in international relations. The senseless murder of civilians in Iraq, Somalia, Haiti, Yugoslavia and East Timor has prompted the United Nations to assume a more active role in preventing human rights abuses and preserving order around the globe. The effect of this trend in favor of humanitarian intervention has been to undermine one of the basic tenets upon which the post-First World War international order has been built: the principle of national sovereignty. Countries that have resisted international intervention, according to United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan, will no longer be able to hide behind protestations of national sovereignty when they flagrantly violate the rights of citizens.2 “Nothing in the ∗ Dr. Alexander is an international law specialist who works on public and private international law matters. From 1993 to 1994, he was a Visiting Fellow for the Office of GATT/WTO Affairs at the Office of the United States Trade Representative under USTR Mickey Kantor.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the James H. Doolittle Papers
    Guide to the James H. Doolittle Papers (1896 - 1993) 78 linear feet Accession Number: 21-95-14-93-3 Collection Number: CA21-95-14-93-3 Collection Dates: 1913 - 2007 Bulk Dates: 1925 - 1996 Prepared by ( Thomas J. Allen CITATION: The James H. Doolittle Papers, Box number, Folder number, HistOlY of Aviation Collection, Special Collections Department, McDermott Library, The University of Texas at Dallas. Special Collections Depaliment McDermott Library, The University of Texas at Dallas Contents Biographical Sketch: ........................................................................................................... 3 Sources: ............................................................................................................................... 4 Additional Sources: ............................................................................................................. 4 Series Description ............................................................................................................... 4 Scope and Content Note...................................................................................................... 7 Collection Note ................................................................................................................. 10 Provenance Statement ....................................................................................................... 10 Literary Rights Statement ................................................................................................. 10 Container list
    [Show full text]