DOCSLIB.ORG

Peerage Creations Since 1997

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Peerage Creations Since 1997 Library Note Peerage Creations since 1997 This House of Lords Library briefing provides details of appointments to the House of Lords since May 1997. It provides tables showing the numbers appointed under the Prime Ministers Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and David Cameron, broken down by party affiliation at the time of appointment. It also includes a chronological list of all those appointed during this period. The information is correct as at 25 January 2016, and includes all those appointed since the 2015 general election. In 2015, 57 new life Peers were appointed to the House of Lords, with 56 of these appointed after the May 2015 general election. Brief statistics regarding these appointments are as follows: 2015: Appointments by 2015: Life Peer Appointments Affiliation 37 40 5 8 35 31 30 26 25 20 Labour 11 20 Conservative 15 10 Liberal Democrat 5 Crossbench 0 Male Female Former Not a MPs Former 33 MP This briefing has been authored jointly by staff in the House of Commons and House of Lords Libraries. Russell Taylor Richard Kelly 3 February 2016 LLN 2016/007 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Peerage Creations ............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Lords Spiritual .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Hereditary Peers ............................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Law Lords............................................................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Appointments Commission Peers ................................................................................................. 2 1.6 Date of Announcement ................................................................................................................... 2 1.7 Party Affiliation .................................................................................................................................. 3 1.8 Former MPs ........................................................................................................................................ 3 2. Peerage Creations by Prime Minister ..................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Tony Blair (May 1997–June 2007) ................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Gordon Brown (June 2007–May 2010) ........................................................................................ 4 2.3 David Cameron (May 2010–January 2016) ................................................................................. 4 2.4 Total ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 3. Analysis of Appointments .......................................................................................................................... 5 4. Chronological List ....................................................................................................................................... 8 5. Appointments Commission Peers ......................................................................................................... 32 House of Lords Library Note I Peerage Creations since 1997 1 1. Introduction This House of Lords Library briefing provides details of peerage creations under the Prime Ministers Tony Blair, Gordon Brown and David Cameron (up to 25 January 2016). The aim is to provide a succinct account of the rate of appointments to the House of Lords during this period, and of the numbers of each of the political parties and Crossbenchers appointed. It does not look at the composition of the House and the balance between the parties at any particular point in time; that is, it does not consider those Members who were already in the House before May 1997 and continued to sit thereafter, and does not take account of absences or deaths among Peers appointed before or after May 1997.1 Part 2 of this briefing provides summary tables of appointments to the House of Lords under the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition Government led by David Cameron and then his appointments to date under the current Conservative Government. It also provides details relating to the previous Labour Government of Tony Blair and Gordon Brown. Part 3 of the briefing illustrates the proportions of women and former MPs appointed to the House of Lords, as well as the average age of appointments by each Prime Minister and appointments by party affiliation. Part 4 of the briefing provides a chronological list of all peerage creations since Tony Blair became Prime Minister in May 1997. Part 5 lists those Peers nominated by the House of Lords Appointments Commission. 1.1 Peerage Creations The Sovereign, on the advice of the Prime Minister, formally confers all peerages. There is no statutory limit on the number of new peerages. It is the Prime Minister who decides what number is appropriate. By convention, when recommending peerages for members of political parties other than their own, prime ministers take advice from the leader of that party. In addition, the House of Lords Appointments Commission makes recommendations for non- party political Peers and vets party nominations for propriety. 1.2 Lords Spiritual Lords Spiritual are not included in the tables or list, since the Archbishops and Bishops do not remain members of the House of Lords for life, and their number remains constant at 26. Former Archbishops or Bishops who were granted life peerages on retirement, however, are featured in the tables and list. 1.3 Hereditary Peers The House of Lords Act 1999 removed the right of most hereditary Peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords. Under the terms of the 1999 Act, 92 hereditary Peers were able to continue as Members of the House. Aside from two hereditary office holders, 90 were initially elected from all those hereditary Members who wished to continue to sit in the House, and those among the 90 who have died have been replaced in by-elections. The 92 hereditary Peers are not treated as new appointments to the House (they are not new peerages), and therefore do not feature in the tables or list in Parts 2 and 4 of this briefing. Several hereditary Peers have been granted a life peerage, however, enabling them to continue to sit in the House. These new 1 More detailed analysis of peerage creations in the 50 years following the passage of the Life Peerages Act 1958 is provided in the Library Note, Peerage Creations 1958–2008, 24 July 2008. 2 House of Lords Library Note I Peerage Creations since 1997 peerages are included in the tables and list. Two new hereditary peerages have been created in the period covered by this briefing, both to members of the royal family: the Earl of Wessex, before the passage of the House of Lords Act 1999, and the Duke of Cambridge, in 2011. These feature in the list but not the summary tables in Part 2. 1.4 Law Lords Until the creation of the Supreme Court, which began operating in October 2009, the House of Lords played a judicial role as the highest court in the land, as well as being part of the legislature. Judicial work was carried out through the Appellate Committee of the House by Lords of Appeal. Lords of Appeal in Ordinary appointed to the House as life Peers under the Appellate Jurisdiction Act 1876 are marked ‘Law’ in the list in Part 4 of this briefing, distinguishing them from hereditary Peers or the vast majority of life Peers appointed to the House under the Life Peerages Act 1958 (marked ‘Life’ in the list in Part 4). It should be noted however that not all Law Lords were appointed to the House under the 1876 Act; some were able to take part in judicial proceedings having held high judicial office and who owed their membership of the House to a hereditary peerage or life peerage under the 1958 Act. It is therefore difficult to separate ‘judicial’ appointments to the House from ‘political’ appointments; the list in Part 4 includes all appointments to the House, but the tables in Part 2 exclude peerages created under the 1876 Act. 1.5 Appointments Commission Peers Following the passage of the House of Lords Act 1999, the then Prime Minister, Tony Blair, announced the establishment of a non-statutory Appointments Commission to assist with the nomination of non-party-political Peers. Since the first group nominated by the Commission became Peers in 2001, 67 new appointments to the Crossbenches have been made in this way. Other appointments to the Crossbenches have continued to be made following recommendation by the Prime Minister, typically distinguished public servants on retirement from office,2 although these have been fewer than the number nominated via the Appointments Commission. Peers created by the Appointments Commission are included in the tables in Part 2 and the list in Part 4, and are listed separately in Part 5. 1.6 Date of Announcement In the remainder of this briefing, the date of a new appointment refers to the date of the announcement of a new peerage, rather than the date of letters patent conferring the peerage or the date of introduction to the House of Lords.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Haessly, Katie (2010) British Conservative Women Mps
    British Conservative Women MPs and ‘Women’s Issues’ 1950-1979 Katie Haessly, BA MA Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2010 1 Abstract In the period 1950-1979, there were significant changes in legislation relating to women’s issues, specifically employment, marital and guardianship and abortion rights. This thesis explores the impact of Conservative female MPs on these changes as well as the changing roles of women within the party. In addition there is a discussion of the relationships between Conservative women and their colleagues which provides insights into the changes in gender roles which were occurring at this time. Following the introduction the next four chapters focus on the women themselves and the changes in the above mentioned women’s issues during the mid-twentieth century and the impact Conservative women MPs had on them. The changing Conservative attitudes are considered in the context of the wider changes in women’s roles in society in the period. Chapter six explores the relationship between women and men of the Conservative Parliamentary Party, as well as men’s impact on the selected women’s issues. These relationships were crucial to enhancing women’s roles within the party, as it is widely recognised that women would not have been able to attain high positions or affect the issues as they did without help from male colleagues. Finally, the female Labour MPs in the alteration of women’s issues is discussed in Chapter seven. Labour women’s relationships both with their party and with Conservative women are also examined.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Thursday Volume 511 10 June 2010 No. 13 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 10 June 2010 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2010 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 443 10 JUNE 2010 444 Friend the Minister, not only for his recent work in House of Commons developing the Government’s ambitious low-carbon economy programme, but for his long-term battle to Thursday 10 June 2010 give communities the power they need to stand up for themselves against inappropriate development. I am grateful to my right hon. Friend the Secretary of The House met at half-past Ten o’clock State for his answer, but will he reassure the House and my constituents that he intends to repeal perverse rules PRAYERS that prevent local councillors from standing up for their constituents— [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] Mr Speaker: Order. I am sorry, but I must now cut off the hon. Gentleman. From now on, questions and answers must be briefer. Oral Answers to Questions Mr Pickles: I think I got the gist; I think my hon. Friend was referring to predetermination and I am delighted to inform the House that it is our intention to COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT repeal those regulations. That means we can give local councils the thing that Members of Parliament so desire— that councillors with opinions can actually vote on The Secretary of State was asked— those opinions.
    [Show full text]
  • Game of Thrones? – Davos, the Download
    Game of Thrones? – Davos, the download Mark Campanale, Tribe Impact Capital Fellow and Founder of the Carbon Tracker Initiative, reports back on his personal take from this year’s Davos. On arriving, you quickly come to understand that the World Economic Forum in Davos isn’t one event, but a series. Focused around the ‘official’ conference, global heads of corporations and governments gather: this is what we see covered on CNN or the BBC news networks. Outside this zone, a much larger muddle of NGO, policymakers and com- mentators gather, fighting for attention of both media and attendees. This parallel Davos is less well known, but is as jam-packed. And this is where I spent my week. The key to making Davos work for you is to learn how to navigate the complex network of parallel events, receptions and dinners. As there is no ‘programme’ to skim through, so working out where to be – and with whom - requires a good network. If fortune shines on you, attending events with just a ‘hotel pass’ (rather than the official ’basic’ at- tendance pass that can cost $50,000) can be and is often thoroughly rewarding. The schedule I created was focused on sustainability, financing the SDGs, climate change, sustainable food systems and yes - inevitably – what block chain will do to turn the world of business and finance on its head. If you like hopping between bars and hotel lobbies and dropping informally into wide ranging but thoughtful discus- sions (often with well-known public figures) then Davos is worth the hassle.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Malloch Brown Doctor of Laws
    Mark Malloch Brown Doctor Of Laws Mark Malloch Brown, as a journalist, political adviser, and World Bank official, you have worked with politicians and executives from across the globe to address the needs of people in developing countries. As administrator of the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) since 1999, you have reformed the UN’s largest agency, raising more than $3 billion a year for programs to promote democracy, fight poverty, protect the environment, and address the impact of HIV/AIDS. Now as UN chief of staff you are helping the secretary- general lead a wide reform effort to modernize the UN. A British citizen, you received an honors degree in history from Cambridge University, and came to the United States to earn a master’s degree in political science from the University of Michigan. In 1977, you began work as a political correspondent for The Economist. You went on to found and edit the Economist Development Report, a monthly chronicle on the aid community and the political economy for development. From 1986 to 1994, you were lead international partner for the Sawyer-Miller Group, a consulting firm, where you advised corporations, governments, and political candidates. In this role, you worked on many campaigns across the developing world, including successfully advising Corazon Aquino when she ran against Ferdinand Marcos for the president of the Philippines. You began working for the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) in 1979. Initially stationed in Thailand, you were in charge of field operations for Cambodian refugees. Later, as deputy chief of the emergency unit in Geneva, you undertook missions in the Horn of Africa and Central America.
    [Show full text]
  • UK Border Agency
    UK Border Agency Title Instructions on drafting replies to MPs’ Correspondence Process Drafting of letters to enquiries from MPs’ and their offices 26 30 November Implementation Date November Expiry/Review Date 2009 2008 CONTAINS MANDATORY INSTRUCTIONS For Action Author All Ministerial drafting units within the UK Border Agency For Information Owner To all units in the UK Border Agency Jill Beckingham handling correspondence. Contact Point Processes Affected All processes relating to answering correspondence from Members of Parliament Assumptions Drafters have sufficient knowledge of their subject to accurately answer the questions raised by a Member of Parliament. NOTES 26 November Issued 2008 Version 3.1 Chapter 1 – General Advice on Correspondence Basics of Writing a Letter Letter Structure Addressing the Letter Opening Paragraph Middle Paragraphs Sign-off Enclosures Background Notes Parliamentary Conventions More than one MP has written about the same person Interim replies Requests from MPs for meetings Chapter 2 – Advice on Ministerial Correspondence Signing of Ministerial Letters Drafting for Ministers Annex 2.A – Phil Woolas Template Annex 2.B – Meg Hillier Template Annex 2.C – Home Secretary Template Annex 2.D – Chief Executive Template Annex 2.E – Home Secretary Stop List Chapter 3 – Advice on Official Replies Use of Official Reply Template Drafting Official Replies Signing Official Replies Annex 3.A – Official Reply Template Chapter 4 – Third Party Replies What is a third party? MPs acting on behalf of a relative of an applicant
    [Show full text]
  • Web of Power
    Media Briefing MAIN HEADING PARAGRAPH STYLE IS main head Web of power SUB TITLE PARAGRAPH STYLE IS main sub head The UK government and the energy- DATE PARAGRAPH STYLE IS date of document finance complex fuelling climate change March 2013 Research by the World Development Movement has Government figures embroiled in the nexus of money and revealed that one third of ministers in the UK government power fuelling climate change include William Hague, are linked to the finance and energy companies driving George Osborne, Michael Gove, Oliver Letwin, Vince Cable climate change. and even David Cameron himself. This energy-finance complex at the heart of government If we are to move away from a high carbon economy, is allowing fossil fuel companies to push the planet to the government must break this nexus and regulate the the brink of climate catastrophe, risking millions of lives, finance sector’s investment in fossil fuel energy. especially in the world’s poorest countries. SUBHEAD PARAGRAPH STYLE IS head A Introduction The world is approaching the point of no return in the Energy-finance complex in figures climate crisis. Unless emissions are massively reduced now, BODY PARAGRAPH STYLE IS body text Value of fossil fuel shares on the London Stock vast areas of the world will see increased drought, whole Exchange: £900 billion1 – higher than the GDP of the countries will be submerged and falling crop yields could whole of sub-Saharan Africa.2 mean millions dying of hunger. But finance is continuing to flow to multinational fossil fuel companies that are Top five UK banks’ underwrote £170 billion in bonds ploughing billions into new oil, gas and coal energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (2260Kb)
    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/4527 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. God and Mrs Thatcher: Religion and Politics in 1980s Britain Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy September 2010 Liza Filby University of Warwick University ID Number: 0558769 1 I hereby declare that the work presented in this thesis is entirely my own. ……………………………………………… Date………… 2 Abstract The core theme of this thesis explores the evolving position of religion in the British public realm in the 1980s. Recent scholarship on modern religious history has sought to relocate Britain‟s „secularization moment‟ from the industrialization of the nineteenth century to the social and cultural upheavals of the 1960s. My thesis seeks to add to this debate by examining the way in which the established Church and Christian doctrine continued to play a central role in the politics of the 1980s. More specifically it analyses the conflict between the Conservative party and the once labelled „Tory party at Prayer‟, the Church of England. Both Church and state during this period were at loggerheads, projecting contrasting visions of the Christian underpinnings of the nation‟s political values. The first part of this thesis addresses the established Church.
    [Show full text]
  • The UAE Lobby: Subverting British Democracy?
    The UAE Lobby: Subverting British democracy? Alex Delmar-Morgan David Miller ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AUTHORS Thanks to the Arab Organisation for Human Alex Delmar-Morgan Rights for its financial support for this report. is a freelance journalist in London and has written Thanks also to all those who have shared for a range of national titles information with us about or related to the UAE including The Guardian, lobby. We are indebted to a wide variety of people The Daily Telegraph, and who have shared stories and information with us, The Independent. He is the most of whom must remain nameless. We also former Qatar and Bahrain correspondent for thank Hilary Aked, Izzy Gill, Tom Griffin, Tom Mills. the Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones. On a personal note, thanks to Narzanin Massoumi for her many contributions to this work. David Miller is a director of Public Interest Investigations, of which Spinwatch.org and CONFLICT OF INTEREST Powerbase.info are projects. He STATEMENT is also Professor of Sociology at the University of Bath in No external person had any role in the study, England. From 2013-2016 design, collection, analysis, and interpretation of he was RCUK Global Uncertainties Leadership data, or writing of the report. For the transparency Fellow leading a project on Understanding and policy of Public Interest Investigations and a list of explaining terrorism expertise in practice. grants received see: http://www.spinwatch.org/ index.php/about/funding Recent publications include: • The Quilliam Foundation: How ‘counter- PUBLIC INTEREST extremism’ works, (co-author, Public interest INVESTIGATIONS Investigations, 2018); • Islamophobia in Europe: counter-extremism Public Interest Investigations (PII) is an policies and the counterjihad movement, independent non-profit making organisation.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PRIME MINISTER Listed Below Are The
    THE PRIME MINISTER Listed below are the names of the special advisers in post at 10 June 2010, including each special adviser’s pay band, and actual salary where this is £58,200 or higher, together with details of the special advisers’ pay ranges for 2010-2011, and the total pay bill cost of special advisers for 2009-2010. Also being published today are revised versions of the Model Contract and Code of Conduct for Special Advisers. Copies have been placed in the Libraries of the House. Appointing Minister Special Adviser in Payband Salary if Post £58,200 or higher (£) The Prime Minister Andy Coulson Within scheme ceiling 140,000 Edward Llewellyn Within scheme ceiling 125,000 Kate Fall PB4 100,000 Jonny Oates PB4 98,500 Gabby Bertin PB3 80,000 Tim Chatwin PB3 70,000 Steve Hilton PB3 90,000 Polly Mackenzie PB3 80,000 Henry Macrory PB3 70,000 James O’Shaughnessy PB3 87,000 Liz Sugg PB3 80,000 Peter Campbell PB2 60,000 Sean Kemp PB2 60,000 Gavin Lockhart PB2 Michael Salter PB2 65,000 Rohan Silva PB2 60,000 Sean Worth PB2 James McGrory PB1 Deputy Prime Minister Lena Pietsch PB3 80,000 Richard Reeves1 PB3 85,000 Alison Suttie PB3 80,000 Chris Saunders PB2 60,000 First Secretary of State, Arminka Helic PB3 70,000 Secretary of State for Denzil Davidson PB2 Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Chancellor of the Ramesh Chhabra PB2 60,000 Exchequer2 Poppy Mitchell-Rose PB1 Lord Chancellor and David Hass PB2 69,266 Secretary of State for Kathryn Laing PB1 Justice Secretary of State for Fiona Cunningham PB2 65,000 the Home Department Nick Timothy PB2
    [Show full text]
  • Appointing Minister Special Adviser in Post Payband Andy Coulson Within
    Appointing Minister Special Adviser in Post Payband The Prime Minister Andy Coulson Within scheme ceiling Edward Llewellyn Within scheme ceiling Kate Fall PB4 Gabby Bertin PB3 Tim Chatwin PB3 Steve Hilton PB3 Polly Mackenzie [1] PB3 Henry Macrory PB3 James O’Shaughnessy PB3 Lena Pietsch1 PB3 Liz Sugg PB3 Peter Campbell PB2 Sean Kemp1 PB2 Gavin Lockhart PB2 Michael Salter PB2 Rohan Silva PB2 Isabel Spearman (p/t) PB2 Sean Worth PB2 Tim Colbourne1 PB1 Deputy Prime Minister Jonny Oates PB4 Richard Reeves PB3 Alison Suttie PB3 Chris Saunders PB2 James McGrory PB1 First Secretary of State, Secretary Arminka Helic PB3 of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Denzil Davidson PB2 First Secretary of State, Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Will Littlejohn PB1 Chancellor of the Exchequer [2] Ramesh Chhabra PB2 Poppy Mitchell-Rose PB1 Lord Chancellor and Secretary of David Hass PB2 State for Justice Kathryn Laing PB1 Secretary of State for the Home Fiona Cunningham PB2 Department and Minister for Women and Equality Nick Timothy PB2 Secretary of State for Defence Luke Coffey PB2 Oliver Waghorn PB2 Hayden Allan PB2 Secretary of State for Business, Katie Waring PB1 Innovation and Skills Giles Wilkes PB1 Secretary of State for Work and Susie Squire PB2 Pensions Philippa Stroud PB2 Secretary of State for Energy and Duncan Brack PB2 Climate Change Joel Kenrick PB2 Secretary of State for Health Bill Morgan PB3 Jenny Parsons PB2 Secretary of State for Education Henry de Zoete PB2 Elena Narozanski PB1 Secretary of State for Giles
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report October 2011–September 2013
    HOUSE OF LORDS APPOINTMENTS COMMISSION ANNUAL REPORT October 2011 to September 2013 House of Lords Appointments Commission Page 3 Contents Section 1: The Appointments Commission 5 Section 2: Appointments of non-party-political peers 8 Section 3: Vetting party-political nominees 11 Annex A: Biographies of the Commission 14 Annex B: Individuals vetted by the Commission 16 and appointed to the House of Lords [Group photo] Page 4 Section 1 The Appointments Commission 1. In May 2000 the Prime Minister established the House of Lords Appointments Commission as an independent, advisory, non-departmental public body. Commission Membership 2. The Commission has seven members, including the Chairman. Three members represent the main political parties and ensure that the Commission has expert knowledge of the House of Lords. The other members, including the Chairman, are independent of government and political parties. The independent members were appointed in October 2008 by open competition, in accordance with the code of the Commissioner for Public Appointments. The party-political members are all members of the House of Lords and were nominated by the respective party leader in November 2010 for three year terms. 3. The terms of all members therefore come to an end in the autumn of 2013. 4. Biographies of the Commission members can be seen at Annex A. 5. The Commission is supported by a small secretariat at 1 Horse Guards Road, London SW1A 2HQ. Role of the House of Lords Appointments Commission 6. The role of the Commission is to: make recommendations for the appointment of non-party-political members of the House of Lords; and vet for propriety recommendations to the House of Lords, including those put forward by the political parties and Prime Minister.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 28 Page 1 Section 28
    Section 28 Page 1 Section 28 Section 28 of the Local Government Act 1988 was a controversial amendment to the UK's Local Government Act 1986, enacted on 24 May 1988 and repealed on 21 June 2000 in Scotland, and on 18 November 2003 in the rest of the UK by section 122 of the Local Government Act 2003. The amendment stated that a local authority "shall not intentionally promote homosexuality or publish material with the intention of promoting homosexuality" or "promote the teaching in any maintained school of the acceptability of homosexuality as a pretended family relationship". Some people believed that Section 28 prohibited local councils from distributing any material, whether plays, leaflets, books, etc, that portrayed gay relationships as anything other than abnormal. Teachers and educational staff in some cases were afraid of discussing gay issues with students for fear of losing state funding. Because it did not create a criminal offence, no prosecution was ever brought under this provision, but its existence caused many groups to close or limit their activities or self- censor. For example, a number of lesbian, gay, transgender, and bisexual student support groups in schools and colleges across Britain were closed due to fears by council legal staff that they could breach the Act. While going through Parliament, the amendment was constantly relabelled with a variety of clause numbers as other amendments were added to or deleted from the Bill, but by the final version of the Bill, which received Royal Assent, it had become Section 28. Section 28 is sometimes referred to as Clause 28.
    [Show full text]