DOCSLIB.ORG

Land and Resource Management Plan for the Prescott National Forest Yavapai and Coconino Counties, Arizona

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Land and Resource Management Plan for the Prescott National Forest Yavapai and Coconino Counties, Arizona United States Department of Agriculture Land and Resource Management Plan for the Prescott National Forest Yavapai and Coconino Counties, Arizona Forest Southwestern MB-R3-09-04 June 2015 Service Region Slightly Revised August 2016 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Printed on recycled paper – June 2015 Land and Resource Management Plan for the Prescott National Forest Coconino and Yavapai Counties, Arizona Contents Commonly Used Acronyms ..................................................................................................... iii Chapter 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 1 Location .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Role and Contributions of the Planning Area ......................................................................................... 1 Prescott National Forest Mission and Vision ......................................................................................... 4 Planning Framework ............................................................................................................................... 4 Needs for Change ................................................................................................................................... 5 1987 Plan Direction Included in the Revised Plan ................................................................................. 7 1987 Plan Direction Not Included in the Revised Plan .......................................................................... 7 Decisions Made in the Plan .................................................................................................................... 7 Plan Organization ................................................................................................................................... 8 Concept Descriptions to Improve Reader Understanding in the Revised Plan ....................................... 9 Chapter 2. Forestwide Desired Conditions ............................................................................ 15 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 15 Physical Resources ............................................................................................................................... 16 Biological Resources ............................................................................................................................ 24 Social and Economic Resources ........................................................................................................... 45 Chapter 3. Objectives ............................................................................................................... 55 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 55 Vegetation............................................................................................................................................. 56 Recreation ............................................................................................................................................. 60 Watersheds ........................................................................................................................................... 64 Aquatic and Terrestrial Wildlife Habitat .............................................................................................. 66 Open Space, Land Adjustment, and Scenic Values .............................................................................. 68 Chapter 4. Standards and Guidelines ..................................................................................... 71 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 71 Physical Resources ............................................................................................................................... 72 Biological Resources ............................................................................................................................ 74 Social and Economic Resources ........................................................................................................... 81 Chapter 5. Management Area Direction ................................................................................ 97 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 97 Agua Fria/Crown King Geographic Area ........................................................................................... 100 Agua Fria Management Area .............................................................................................................. 102 Crown King Management Area .......................................................................................................... 103 Prescott/Chino/Drake Geographic Area ............................................................................................. 105 Upper Verde Management Area ......................................................................................................... 106 Williamson Valley North Management Area ..................................................................................... 108 Williamson Valley South Management Area ..................................................................................... 109 Prescott Basin Management Area ....................................................................................................... 110 Verde Valley Geographic Area .......................................................................................................... 112 Verde Valley Management Area ........................................................................................................ 114 Chapter 6. Monitoring and Evaluation ................................................................................ 117 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 117 Monitoring Strategy ............................................................................................................................ 118 Chapter 7. Suitability ............................................................................................................. 127 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 127 Timber Suitability ............................................................................................................................... 128 Range Suitability ................................................................................................................................ 129 Recreation Suitability ......................................................................................................................... 133 Land and Resource Management Plan for the Prescott NF i Chapter 8. Additional Plan Direction ................................................................................... 135 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ 135 Project Consistency with the Plan ...................................................................................................... 135 Changes to the Plan ............................................................................................................................ 139 Other Sources of Direction ................................................................................................................. 139 List of Preparers ..................................................................................................................... 142 Glossary ................................................................................................................................... 144 References ............................................................................................................................... 152 Appendix A. Maps .................................................................................................................. 155 Appendix B. Proposed
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Prescott Valley Relocation Guide 2015-2016 1 Location & Climate
    www.azrelocationguides.com Top quality education is offered by many local area colleges and universities, along with the local school district. TABLE OF CONTENTS Location & Climate ...........................2 Housing & Shopping .........................3 Community Profile ........................ 4-6 Prescott Valley, Arizona Education ...................................... 7-9 Adult Living ......................................10 Healthcare ................................ 11-13 Recreation & Attractions .......... 14-16 ocated among the midst rolling hills and Day Trips .................................... 17-20 L grasslands between the Bradshaw and Cultural Arts ....................................21 Mingus Mountains, lies one of the newest and friendliest communities in Arizona. History ..............................................22 Situated about two hours by car north of Resources .................................. 23-27 Phoenix, Prescott Valley (incorporated in Places of Worship ......................23 1978) offers many opportunities for it's size Organizations & Clubs ..............23 in a generally mild four season climate. Coming Events ..........................24 The Town Center in citizen friendly Restaurants ................................25 Prescott Valley offers many amenities, such as the Harkins 14 Screen Luxury Cineplex, Important Numbers ............. 26-27 located within the Prescott Valley Entertainment Center. Numerous Advertisers Index ............................28 restaurants have joined the theater in making
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Chino Valley North 7½' Quadrangle, Yavapai County, Arizona
    DIGITAL GEOLOGIC MAP DGM-80 Arizona Geological Survey www.azgs.az.gov GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE CHINO VALLEY NORTH 7½’ QUADRANGLE, YAVAPAI COUNTY, ARIZONA, V. 1.0 Brian. F. Gootee, Charles A. Ferguson, Jon E. Spencer and Joseph P. Cook December 2010 ARIZONA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Geologic Map of the Chino Valley North 7½' Quadrangle, Yavapai County, Arizona by Brian F. Gootee, Charles A. Ferguson, Jon E. Spencer, and Joe P. Cook Arizona Geological Survey Digital Geologic Map DGM-80 version 1.0 December, 2010 Scale 1:24,000 (1 sheet, with text) Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress St., #100, Tucson, Arizona 85701 This geologic map was funded in part by the USGS National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program, award no. 08HQAG0093. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government. Table of Contents Table of Contents......................................................................................................................... i List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. ii Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Geologic Discussion ................................................................................................................... 3 Quaternary faulting ...........................................................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • Chino Valley Irrigation District
    CHINO VALLEY IRRIGATION DISTRICT. WILLOW CREEK PROJECT - ____ - O(XUMETISEPPLT'(tNUM3-E" OT1-2 D1PRTMENT OF RECIYIDtU) j, CHINO VALLFY IRRIGATION DISTRICT. Chino Valley, Ariz. December 15, 1933 'r. Homer R. lood, Chairman, r'uTljc welfare Board and Clviiorks Adminstration, Yavapal Coty, Prescott, Arizona. Dear Sir: In resonse to your suggestion,we submit a brief acoot of oonditjons in connection withthe pro- ject of the Chino Valley Irrigation Districton which we are askinaid dsr the C..A.pgrar. ThIs is a proposal to lay concrete tile in tre SIxteen miles of canal that 1eadthe water from the store reservoir in Lake watson to the landsnow i.der irrigation in Little Chino Valley. Prom experience over a period of seventeen years, during which the irrigation project has been in oneratlone place the lose by seepage and evaporation, by reason of carrying the water in theopen ditches through earth andnnc1. as they are atreeent constructed, at not less thin 40% of the amount of waterstored. By lining the canals or laying theconcrete tile as proposed, this loss will be airiestcompletely e1iminaed. situated as we are ina climate of low hu- midity the evaporation inopen ditches is excessive, and the plan of concrete tile, fromour experience proves the most effective means of coribattingthis 1088, both from evaporation and from seepage. Thie has the addedad- vantage of utilizing a ma.ximi.nn ofmaterial ready at hand In the way of sand and gravel aggregate,leaving only the cement to be purchased, andriniring the bulk of the expenditure for labor, which is mder tIons, highly desirable.
    [Show full text]
  • Incident Management Situation Report Saturday, August 19, 2000 - 0700 Mdt National Preparedness Level V
    INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SITUATION REPORT SATURDAY, AUGUST 19, 2000 - 0700 MDT NATIONAL PREPAREDNESS LEVEL V CURRENT SITUATION: Eleven new large fires were reported, including six in the Eastern Great Basin Area and three in the Northern Rockies Area. Containment was reached on 11 large fires in the Southern, Eastern Great Basin and Rocky Mountain Areas. Initial attack activity was moderate in most areas, with precipitation received on some of the large fires. High winds are forecast today for Idaho and Montana, severely challenging firelines in those states. Firefighters from Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Mexico are participating in the fire suppression efforts. Two more military battalions have been ordered. An Army battalion will fill one order from Fort Campbell, Kentucky and the other order will be filled by a Marine battalion from Camp LeJeune, North Carolina. Very high to extreme fire indices have been reported in North Dakota, Texas, and all the western states except New Mexico. NORTHERN ROCKIES AREA LARGE FIRES: An Area Command Team (Edrington) is assigned to manage the large fires in the Hamilton area. An Area Command Team (Mann) is assigned to manage the large fires in southwest Montana. An Area Command Team (Meuchel) is assigned to manage the large fires in central Montana. A Type I Incident Management Team (Wands) is assigned to manage the large fires in northwest Montana. Priorities are being established by the Northern Rockies Multi- Agency Coordinating Group based on information submitted via Wildfire Situation Analysis reports and Incident Status Summary (ICS-209) forms. BLODGETT TRAILHEAD, Bitterroot National Forest. A Type I Incident Management Team (Gage) is assigned.
    [Show full text]
  • Synthesis of Upper Verde River Research and Monitoring 1993-2008
    Chapter 1 Introduction Daniel G. Neary, John N. Rinne, Alvin L. Medina, Malchus B. Baker, Jr. Location The UVR area of north-central Arizona overlaps the Central Highlands and the Plateau Uplands biogeographic provinces. The UVR area occupies about 6,700 km2 (2,600 mi2) of Yavapai and Coconino Counties (fig. 1.1), and its watershed encom- passes the northern valley of the Verde River bounded by the escarpment of the Mogollon Rim to the north and northeast and by the Black Hills to the southwest. The Mogollon Rim escarpment is the boundary between the Plateau uplands prov- ince and the Central highlands province. It is a steeply sloping cliff that rises 310 to 610 m (1,000 to 2,000 ft) from the Verde Valley floor to elevations of 1,680 to 2,290 m (5,500 to 7,500 ft). The Rim is dissected by deeply incised canyons. South of the Rim, the landscape is characterized by many buttes and mesas. The Verde River is the major stream that drains the study area. The UVR water- shed begins 120 km (75 mi) to the northwest of the study area near Frazier Wells, but streamflow is only intermittent in that portion. Perennial flow begins in Section 15, Township 17 N., Range 1 W. The river flows along the foot of the Black Hills eastward to Perkinsville, then southeastward where it leaves the study area at Tapco, just upstream of Clarkdale and below its confluence with Sycamore Creek. For the purposes of this synthesis and the monitoring and research that has been conducted by RMRS, the UVR consists of the perennial flow reach from the dam at Sullivan Lake downstream to the boundary of the Prescott National Forest at Tapco (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Canyon Council Oa Where to Go Camping Guide
    GRAND CANYON COUNCIL OA WHERE TO GO CAMPING GUIDE GRAND CANYON COUNCIL, BSA OA WHERE TO GO CAMPING GUIDE Table of Contents Introduction to The Order of the Arrow ....................................................................... 1 Wipala Wiki, The Man .................................................................................................. 1 General Information ...................................................................................................... 3 Desert Survival Safety Tips ........................................................................................... 4 Further Information ....................................................................................................... 4 Contact Agencies and Organizations ............................................................................. 5 National Forests ............................................................................................................. 5 U. S. Department Of The Interior - Bureau Of Land Management ................................ 7 Maricopa County Parks And Recreation System: .......................................................... 8 Arizona State Parks: .................................................................................................... 10 National Parks & National Monuments: ...................................................................... 11 Tribal Jurisdictions: ..................................................................................................... 13 On the Road: National
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1464 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1132
    § 1132 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION Page 1464 Department and agency having jurisdiction of, and reports submitted to Congress regard- thereover immediately before its inclusion in ing pending additions, eliminations, or modi- the National Wilderness Preservation System fications. Maps, legal descriptions, and regula- unless otherwise provided by Act of Congress. tions pertaining to wilderness areas within No appropriation shall be available for the pay- their respective jurisdictions also shall be ment of expenses or salaries for the administra- available to the public in the offices of re- tion of the National Wilderness Preservation gional foresters, national forest supervisors, System as a separate unit nor shall any appro- priations be available for additional personnel and forest rangers. stated as being required solely for the purpose of managing or administering areas solely because (b) Review by Secretary of Agriculture of classi- they are included within the National Wilder- fications as primitive areas; Presidential rec- ness Preservation System. ommendations to Congress; approval of Con- (c) ‘‘Wilderness’’ defined gress; size of primitive areas; Gore Range-Ea- A wilderness, in contrast with those areas gles Nest Primitive Area, Colorado where man and his own works dominate the The Secretary of Agriculture shall, within ten landscape, is hereby recognized as an area where years after September 3, 1964, review, as to its the earth and its community of life are un- suitability or nonsuitability for preservation as trammeled by man, where man himself is a visi- wilderness, each area in the national forests tor who does not remain. An area of wilderness classified on September 3, 1964 by the Secretary is further defined to mean in this chapter an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its of Agriculture or the Chief of the Forest Service primeval character and influence, without per- as ‘‘primitive’’ and report his findings to the manent improvements or human habitation, President.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Area Direction
    Chapter 5. Management Area Direction Riparian vegetation along the upper Verde River Introduction The 1987 “Prescott National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan” included specific direction on how to manage different land areas based on ecological characteristics. In this revised plan, we have addressed ecological variation using other methods (see chapters 1 and 2). Management area boundaries were selected based on human geographic boundaries, so that guidance in response to social or economic issues could be better identified to meet each community’s needs. As plan revision steps progressed, we asked ourselves which aspects of the plan needed to be addressed differently based on geographic location. The response was that recreation needs and desires were likely to be different for various parts of the Prescott NF. In addition, the Verde Valley area had specific desires relative to maintaining and enhancing open space. The Prescott NF was divided into human geographic areas based on descriptions of communities located near and within the Prescott NF (Komar and Schultz, 2007). Using methods developed by James Kent and Associates, geographic areas were mapped indicating where people from various communities feel strongly about conditions and events. Communities were then invited to develop community visions for the Prescott NF and other surrounding lands. Land and Resource Management Plan for the Prescott NF 97 Chapter 5. Management Area Direction In a more recent effort to develop a recreation strategy for the Prescott NF, similar boundaries were used to divide the forest and surrounding area into three zones. In this plan, those zone boundaries were adjusted slightly and are called geographic areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L
    Page 1517 TITLE 16—CONSERVATION § 1131 (Pub. L. 88–363, § 10, July 7, 1964, 78 Stat. 301.) Sec. 1132. Extent of System. § 1110. Liability 1133. Use of wilderness areas. 1134. State and private lands within wilderness (a) United States areas. The United States Government shall not be 1135. Gifts, bequests, and contributions. liable for any act or omission of the Commission 1136. Annual reports to Congress. or of any person employed by, or assigned or de- § 1131. National Wilderness Preservation System tailed to, the Commission. (a) Establishment; Congressional declaration of (b) Payment; exemption of property from attach- policy; wilderness areas; administration for ment, execution, etc. public use and enjoyment, protection, preser- Any liability of the Commission shall be met vation, and gathering and dissemination of from funds of the Commission to the extent that information; provisions for designation as it is not covered by insurance, or otherwise. wilderness areas Property belonging to the Commission shall be In order to assure that an increasing popu- exempt from attachment, execution, or other lation, accompanied by expanding settlement process for satisfaction of claims, debts, or judg- and growing mechanization, does not occupy ments. and modify all areas within the United States (c) Individual members of Commission and its possessions, leaving no lands designated No liability of the Commission shall be im- for preservation and protection in their natural puted to any member of the Commission solely condition, it is hereby declared to be the policy on the basis that he occupies the position of of the Congress to secure for the American peo- member of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Yavapai County Water Aware
    Water - Essential for all life This workbook is a regional resource designed to guide and assist citizens in their efforts to conserve water, with an emphasis on the reduction of outdoor water use. It could not have been written and produced without the dedication, professional advice and financial support provided by numerous individuals and groups. Special Thank You to the: Citizens of this region who continue to support the work of water conservation education and the responsible use of our limited resource. U.S. Bureau of Reclamation for the funding necessary to produce this workbook and continue our regional water conservation efforts. Prescott Active Management Agency (AMA) Upper Verde River Watershed Protection Coalition Includes the member communities: Yavapai County Water Advisory Committee Yavapai Prescott - Indian Tribe Town of Chino Valley Town of Prescott Valley Town of Dewey-Humboldt City of Prescott Principal Authors and Project Manager: Shaun Rydell, Water Conservation Coordinator- City of Prescott Amelia Ray – Masters Student – Prescott College Editor: Shaun Rydell 2009 Cover Photography by Kim Webb Legal Notice: Wide distribution of information included in this workbook is encouraged and permitted. This document is not intended to be a professional, legally binding instruction manual. The authors, editor, and municipal agents assume no responsibility for damages, financial or otherwise, which may result from use of the information and/or advice included in this publication. If all or part of the information included
    [Show full text]
  • AZWILD Fall 0506
    NEWSLETTER OF THE ARIZONA WILDERNESS COALITION ARIZONA WILDWILD Growing Pains East Clear Creek Selling Green Amid the Glitz The Greatest Job in the World Don’t Move a Mussel SUMMER 2008 Arizona Wilderness Coalition Main Office THOUGHTS FROM THE KGB 520-326-4300 P.O. Box 40340, Tucson, AZ 85717 Growing Stronger and Smarter Phoenix Office 602-252-5530 P.O. Box 13524 by Kevin Gaither-Banchoff Phoenix, AZ 85002 Central Arizona Field Office rizona’s last wild public lands remain at risk. result of political and social pressures. 928-717-6076 They continue to be threatened by myriad Alone, many of us think we don’t have the power P.O. Box 2741 pressures – some that are unique to our to affect change or make our voices heard. When many Prescott, AZ 86302 Asouthwestern desert home and some that diverse individuals, business, and organizations speak are common to wild places across the west. Almost all up with a similar preservation/protection message, we Grand Canyon Field Office are threats that we--as individuals, businesses, and have the power to make positive changes and combat 928-638-2304 conservation organizations--can work to eliminate or the threats facing Arizona’s wild places. As we move P.O. Box 1033 minimize through education, constant engagement through 2008, we hope to permanently protect the Grand Canyon, AZ 86203 with allied stakeholders and our elected officials, and Tumacacori Highlands as Arizona’s first wilderness in cultivating a sense of land and water stewardship 17 years, see Fossil Creek become Arizona’s second Sky Islands Field Office amongst the public.
    [Show full text]
  • Prescott National Forest This Report Contains the Best Available Information at the Time of Publication
    Schedule of Proposed Action (SOPA) 04/01/2020 to 06/30/2020 Prescott National Forest This report contains the best available information at the time of publication. Questions may be directed to the Project Contact. Expected Project Name Project Purpose Planning Status Decision Implementation Project Contact Projects Occurring Nationwide Locatable Mining Rule - 36 CFR - Regulations, Directives, In Progress: Expected:12/2021 12/2021 Nancy Rusho 228, subpart A Orders DEIS NOA in Federal Register 202-731-9196 EIS 09/13/2018 [email protected] *NEW LISTING* Est. FEIS NOA in Federal Register 11/2021 Description: The U.S. Department of Agriculture proposes revisions to its regulations at 36 CFR 228, Subpart A governing locatable minerals operations on National Forest System lands.A draft EIS & proposed rule should be available for review/comment in late 2020 Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=57214 Location: UNIT - All Districts-level Units. STATE - All States. COUNTY - All Counties. LEGAL - Not Applicable. These regulations will be applicable to all NFS lands open to mineral entry under the United States Mining Law. R3 - Southwestern Region, Occurring in more than one Forest (excluding Regionwide) Prescott College Academic - Recreation management On Hold N/A N/A Julie Rowe Outfitter and Guide Priority Use - Special use management 928-203-7516 (2015-2025) [email protected] CE Description: The Forest Service proposes to authorize Prescott College to conduct academic field courses year-round across forests in Arizona including adventure education, biology, human ecology, natural history, physical geography, & field ecology. Web Link: http://www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=47407 Location: UNIT - Coronado National Forest All Units, Kaibab National Forest All Units, Prescott National Forest All Units, Tonto Basin Ranger District, Coconino National Forest All Units, Apache-Sitgreaves National Forests All Units.
    [Show full text]