Amending the Constitution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Amending the Constitution Chapter 3 Amending the Constitution The 1921 Armidale Convention had resolved that there would be a double thrust to the New-Staters' efforts. They would petition the NSW Parliament - the issue will be explored in the next chapter - and they would strive for an amendment of the Commonwealth Constitution. Initially, this amendment would be sought via a submission to a proposed constitutional convention. When no convention was held, the New-Staters pressed for a constitutional amendment via a Federal referendum. Never having the numbers in the Federal Parliament, the parliamentary supporters of New States never secured their desired amendment, even when they were in Government. They could not overcome the hurdles. This chapter will examine the hurdles and the attempts to amend the Constitution between 1919 and 1930, and will analyse how Page and Thompson responded when they came up against complex political structures and diverse political agendas in the Federal arena. Constitutional amendment was possible, but there would be hurdles to overcome. The first part of this chapter will outline the hurdles, so that the New- Staters' efforts will be set in the context of what was necessary. Amending the Constitution would require a national referendum. I A straight-out referendum would require a bill to be drafted, tabled, debated and passed by a majority in both Houses. On the other hand, if a majority in the Houses did not favour a referendum, then the key political issue for reformers would be how to secure the majority. Securing the parliamentary majority was the first hurdle. A referendum would be expensive and the outcome would be unpredictable; it would be anybody's guess how the majority of electors in a majority of the States would vote. The second hurdle was to secure the majority in a national referendum. The need for constitutional amendment had long been recognised; between 1919 and 1930 various means were advocated for securing agreement on the desired amendments. During 1919, the Nationalist Party overcame the first hurdle when bills were drafted, tabled, debated and passed by a majority in both Houses, for a referendum to be held in conjunction with the 1919 Federal election. The two 1 See Chapter VIII of the Commonwealth Constitution. MA (Mons) Thesis Chapter 3 Amending the Constitution 70 proposed amendments were rejected; the second hurdle had not been overcome.2 During the next election, the Prime Minister, W.M. Hughes, said that proposals for constitutional amendment "ought to be treated as non-party measures", but "the fact remains that amendments put forward by one party have been opposed by its opponents". 3 He believed that amendments framed by the party in power and submitted at a referendum would not be approved by the majority of electors in the majority of the States. His proposed solution was a constitutional convention followed by a referendum. This method, however, would be more complicated, because a convention could only suggest amendments which could not be adopted without a Federal referendum. For a convention to be held, a bill would have to be passed through both Houses, then after the convention, another bill would have to be passed for a national referendum to be held. Thus, a convention followed by a referendum would be more expensive and the outcome would be more unpredictable and would exacerbate the difficulties already mentioned. In 1921, a bill for a constitutional convention was drafted, tabled, and debated, but suitable to none of the parties, the bill was defeated and shelved. A parliamentary majority had not been secured; the bill did not get over the first hurdle. There were other problems with a constitutional convention. As shown in 1921, there was the difficulty with the enabling legislation, because the political parties and the States disagreed on the proportions of representatives; there would also be the huge expense of electing a convention; lastly, the results would have to be debated in the Federal Parliament before submission at a national referendum, whose vicissitudes have already been mentioned. The problems with a convention were well summed up in 1927, by J.G. Latham, the Attorney-General, who said: "a convention is a practical impossibility".4 Between 1923 and 1927, S.M. Bruce, the new Prime Minister, switched from advocating a constitutional convention, to advocating a constitutional session, then a select committee, and finally, a royal commission. In 1927, given that a constitutional convention was "a practical impossibility", the Government tried to appoint a select committee, but Labor would not co-operate. Accordingly, the Government opted for a royal commission. Another option - a parliamentary 2 For a summary of Federal referendum proposals and their outcomes, 1901-19, see Commonwealth Parliamentary Debates (CPD), 14 March 1930, vol. 123, p. 179. 3 National Policy and Record, the Prime Ministers Policy Speech, Tuesday, 26 October 1922, Sydney, 1922, copy in Latham Papers, NL, MS 1009/24-13. 4 Ballarat Courier, 8 August 1927. MA (Hons) Thesis Chapter 3 Amending the Constitution 71 constitutional session - had been overlooked. No explanation was given for not holding the constitutional session. It seems the Government was not serious about the amendments and had proposed a royal commission because it would look as though something was being done, when all that was happening was that time would be passing. Latham's claim that "a commission is the simplest way out of the difficulty" was more telling than he thought.5 There were other hurdles which the New-Staters would face in their attempts to amend the Constitution and these must be outlined also. The proposed amendment would have to be appropriately worded, but the wording was contentious. The new provision(s) in Chapter VI of the Constitution would have to specify whether a referendum should be held solely in the proposed New State area, or in the State as a whole before the Commonwealth would continue with the separation process. It seems doubtful that a constitutional amendment would be agreed to if it ruled out the opportunity for the State as a whole to express its opinion on the separation of its territory. On the other hand, any amendment which included the requirement of the State's approval would be no significant improvement on the existing provision in Section 124. The wording of the amendment was a vexed issue. As noted in chapter 1, logistically, it should have been less difficult to secure the New State via the existing Section 124, than by attempting to amend the Constitution. Early in the 1920s, however, it seemed eminently sensible for the New-Staters to seek an amendment to the Commonwealth Constitution rather than seeking the approval of the NSW Parliament. As it turned out, however, the New- Staters would never got past the first hurdle, they would never secure a parliamentary majority, and therefore, would never secure a constitutional convention or a Federal referendum. ******************* The second part of this chapter will analyse the emergence of a third party and the party's various attempts to secure a bill for a constitutional convention. It was noted in chapter 1 that Earle Page had won Cowper at the December 1919 Federal elections. Subsequently, early in 1920 he joined with some other country members in the Parliament to form a third party, the Australian Country Party (ACP). The ACP arose from the Australian Farmers' Federal Organization (AFFO), which had been formed in 1917 to provide a national link between 5 Loc. cit. MA (Hons) Thesis Chapter 3 Amending the Constitution 72 affiliated State bodies. Some twenty-six AFFO candidates were nominated at the Federal election in December 1919; some also had the endorsement of the Nationalist Party. Of the twenty-six candidates, fifteen were successful, eleven of them in the House of Representatives. Their success was due to the newly introduced preferential voting, because the danger of vote-splitting had been eliminated. 6 The emergence of the ACP was an expression of agrarian unrest; this point was noted in chapter 2. There were eleven ACP members in the House of Representatives.? Although the party would hold the balance of power, its clout would be undermined because the party did not always vote as a whole. The ACP was not united on many issues and lacked the discipline of the Labor Party or the cohesion of the Nationalists. The Country Party included a radical group which would support Labor against the Nationalists, a conservative group who were totally opposed to Labor, and a middle group of varying views. 8 This did not augur well for the use of its balance of power. The party met in Melbourne, the temporary Federal Capital, in January 1920. 9 Having elected the office bearers, the party got down to the business of constitutional reforms. The AFFO had included constitutional reform on its 1919 platform. 1 ° The ACP resolved that the proposed convention "should be elective on its basis", that each State "should have an equal number of delegates" to be elected by proportional representation, and reflecting "community of interest" with "proper rural representation". 11 This decision about the selection of delegates for the proposed convention would later be adopted as the official view of the Northern New State Movement. 6 Farming parties had insisted on contesting elections, and had split the Nationalists vote; the Nationalists agreed to introduce preferential voting to prevent Labor from winning the elections. See U.R. Ellis, A History of the Australian Country Party, Melbourne, 1963, pp. 41-44; Cecil Edwards, Bruce of Melbourne: Man of Two Worlds, London, 1965, pp. 40-2; B.D. Graham, The Formation of the Australian Country Parties, Canberra, 1966, pp. 126-9. 7 The ACP members were: W.C.
Recommended publications
  • Political Attitudes to Conscription: 1914–1918
    RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2016–17 27 OCTOBER 2016 Political attitudes to conscription: 1914–1918 Dr Nathan Church Foreign Affairs, Defence and Security Section Contents Introduction ................................................................................................ 2 Attitudes of the Australian Labor Party ........................................................ 2 Federal government ......................................................................................... 2 New South Wales ............................................................................................. 7 Victoria ............................................................................................................. 8 Queensland ...................................................................................................... 9 Western Australia ........................................................................................... 10 South Australia ............................................................................................... 11 Political impact on the ALP ............................................................................... 11 Attitudes of the Commonwealth Liberal Party ............................................. 12 Attitudes of the Nationalist Party of Australia ............................................. 13 The second conscription plebiscite .................................................................. 14 Conclusion ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Compulsory Voting in Australian National Elections
    Parliament of Australia Department of Parliamentary Services Parliamentary Library RESEARCH BRIEF Information analysis and advice for the Parliament 31 October 2005, no. 6, 2005–06, ISSN 1832-2883 Compulsory voting in Australian national elections Compulsory voting has been part of Australia’s national elections since 1924. Renewed Liberal Party interest and a recommendation by the Joint Standing Committee on Electoral Matters that voluntary and compulsory voting be the subject of future investigation, suggest that this may well be an important issue at the next election. This research brief refers to the origins of compulsory voting in Australia, describes its use in Commonwealth elections, outlines the arguments for and against compulsion, discusses the political impact of compulsory voting and refers to suggested reforms. Scott Bennett Politics and Public Administration Section Contents Executive summary ................................................... 3 Introduction ........................................................ 4 The emergence of compulsory voting in Australia ............................. 5 Compulsory voting elsewhere ........................................... 8 Administration of compulsory voting in Australian national elections ............... 8 To retain or reject compulsory voting? ..................................... 9 Opposition to compulsory voting ......................................... 9 Support for compulsory voting .......................................... 11 The political impact of compulsory voting
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Mar N'letter.Qxd
    Mar. 2009 Vol. 9 No. 1 Inverness Courier website proves invaluable by Robin Parker While researching my ggg grandparents Donald James Fraser Born on 3 October, 1827 Fraser and Mary Gray of Lochend, Inverness-shire, Baptized on 9 October, 1827 Scotland I came across the website and found an Barbara Born on 3 October, 1827 entry from Greg Fraser in Canberra. Baptized on 9 October, 1827 Greg is a gg grandson of John Fraser who turns out Isabell Born on 7 January, 1830 to be a brother to my gg grandfather William Fraser, Baptized on 13 January, 1830 both sons of Donald Fraser and Mary Gray. Charles Walker Born on 15 July, 1832. John and family settled in Parramatta in 1855, John On 8 September, 1836, Donald Fraser wrote to was a carpenter and William and family arrived in Anne Baillie, Dunain asking about lease of the Portland, Victoria in October 1856 and settled at Lochend Inn. An image of the letter has been obtained Hamilton in 1860, William Fraser was also a carpenter. from the Highlands Council Archives Office, Inverness Donald Fraser was baptized on 12 December, 1793 and is written on next page. in Inverness, Inverness-shire, Scotland by Mr. Fraser. His parents were James Fraser, Cartwright at Dunain INSIDE THIS EDITION and Anna MacRae. Donald Fraser and Donald Fraser Inverness Courier Website 1-3 were the witnesses. His siblings were William Fraser, baptized 19 September, 1791, and Ann Frazer, baptized Mystery Photograph Identified 4 7 June, 1797. Swan Hill Fatality 5 We have no record of the birth or christening of Hugh McCall, Visionary 6-7 Anna MacRae.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Labor Party, New South Wales Branch Annual Conference, 29 – 31 March 1929
    CHAPTER 7 Australian Labor Party, New South Wales Branch Annual Conference, 29 – 31 March 1929 Report in The Sydney Morning Herald One can detect that the Lang machine was already in election mode at the 1929 Conference and confident of victory. Almost no business was conducted and the meeting took only three days (allowing delegates to go to the races on Easter Monday!). No sign of disunity was allowed to develop. Part of the rationale given by the Executive was that the two preliminary regional conferences had done their work so well that there was little for the State Conference to do. However, it was almost certainly true that the Rural and Metropolitan Conferences had been stage‐managed as efficiently as the State Conference. The one matter of controversy that surfaced was some dissatis‐ faction with instances of graft in preselection ballots, leading to suggestions that these ballots should be abolished – with all decisions presumably to be made by the Executive. That proposal (originating from the radical left as a veiled criticism of Inner Group meddling) was not taken up, although the Inner Group would not hesitate to interfere, officially or unofficially, in any preselections not already sewn up. ξ 211 LABOR PAINS VOLUME V Executive Report of NSW ALP for 1928-29 (Mitchell Library Manuscripts, 329.3106/3) Australian Labor Party, State of New South Wales, Executive Report Ladies and Gentlemen: The 38th Annual Report and Balance-sheet of the Australian Labor Party, State of New South Wales, is hereby submitted for your consideration. Since the presentation of the last report many of the old Branches have been reconstituted, and the following new ones brought into being: Metropolitan Country South Bankstown.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Career of Senator Paddy Lynch (1867-1944)
    With an Olive Branch and a Shillelagh: the Political Career of Senator Paddy Lynch (1867-1944) by Danny Cusack M.A. Presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of Murdoch University December 2002 I declare that this thesis is my own account of my research and contains as its main content work which has not been previously submitted for a degree at any tertiary education institution. ……..…………………………… Danny Cusack ABSTRACT As a loyal Empire man and ardent conscriptionist, Irish-born Senator Paddy Lynch swam against the prevailing Irish Catholic Labor political current. He was one of those MP’s who followed Prime Minister W.M. Hughes out of the Federal Labor caucus in November 1916, serving out the rest of his political career in the Nationalist ranks. On the face of things, he represents something of a contradiction. A close examination of Lynch’s youth in Ireland, his early years in Australia and his subsequent parliamentary career helps us to resolve this apparent paradox. It also enables us to build up a picture of Lynch the man and to explain his political odyssey. He emerges as representative of that early generation of conservative Laborites (notably J.C. Watson, W.G. Spence and George Pearce) who, once they had achieved their immediate goals of reform, saw their subsequent role as defending the prevailing social order. Like many of these men, Lynch’s commitment to the labour movement’s principles of solidarity and collective endeavour co-existed with a desire for material self-advancement. More fundamentally, when Lynch accumulated property and was eventually able to take up the occupation which he had known in Ireland – farming – his evolving class interest inevitably occasioned a change in political outlook.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia in the League of Nations: a Centenary View
    RESEARCH PAPER SERIES, 2018–19 21 DECEMBER 2018 Australia in the League of Nations: a centenary view James Cotton Emeritus Professor of Politics, University of New South Wales, ADFA, Canberra Contents The League and global politics beyond the Empire-Commonwealth . 2 The requirements of membership ...................................................... 3 The Australian experience as a League mandatory ............................ 4 Peace, disarmament, collective security ............................................. 6 The League and the management of international trade and economic policy ................................................................................ 10 The League’s social agenda ............................................................... 11 Geneva as a school for international affairs for some prominent Australians ......................................................................................... 12 The Australian League of Nations Union........................................... 13 The League idea in Australia ............................................................. 14 Discussion of the League in the parliament and the debate on foreign affairs .................................................................................... 16 Conclusions: Australia in the League ................................................ 19 ISSN 2203-5249 The League and global politics beyond the Empire-Commonwealth With the formation of the Australian Commonwealth, the new nation adopted a constitution that imparted to the
    [Show full text]
  • Earle Page and the Imagining of Australia
    ‘NOW IS THE PSYCHOLOGICAL MOMENT’ EARLE PAGE AND THE IMAGINING OF AUSTRALIA ‘NOW IS THE PSYCHOLOGICAL MOMENT’ EARLE PAGE AND THE IMAGINING OF AUSTRALIA STEPHEN WILKS Ah, but a man’s reach should exceed his grasp, Or what’s a heaven for? Robert Browning, ‘Andrea del Sarto’ The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. Edward John Phelps Earle Page as seen by L.F. Reynolds in Table Talk, 21 October 1926. Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] Available to download for free at press.anu.edu.au ISBN (print): 9781760463670 ISBN (online): 9781760463687 WorldCat (print): 1198529303 WorldCat (online): 1198529152 DOI: 10.22459/NPM.2020 This title is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). The full licence terms are available at creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode This publication was awarded a College of Arts and Social Sciences PhD Publication Prize in 2018. The prize contributes to the cost of professional copyediting. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Cover photograph: Earle Page strikes a pose in early Canberra. Mildenhall Collection, NAA, A3560, 6053, undated. This edition © 2020 ANU Press CONTENTS Illustrations . ix Acknowledgements . xi Abbreviations . xiii Prologue: ‘How Many Germans Did You Kill, Doc?’ . xv Introduction: ‘A Dreamer of Dreams’ . 1 1 . Family, Community and Methodism: The Forging of Page’s World View . .. 17 2 . ‘We Were Determined to Use Our Opportunities to the Full’: Page’s Rise to National Prominence .
    [Show full text]
  • The Leader of the Opposition
    The Leader of the Opposition ‘…just as there can be no good or stable government without a sound majority, so there will be a dictatorial government unless there is the constant criticism of an intelligent, active, and critical opposition.’ –Sir Robert Menzies, 1948 The practice in Australia is for the leader of the party or coalition that can secure a majority in the House of Representatives to be appointed as Prime Minister. The leader of the largest party or Hon. Dr. H.V. Evatt coalition outside the government serves as Leader of the Opposition. Leader of the Opposition 1951 - 1960 The Leader of the Opposition is his or her party’s candidate for Prime National Library of Australia Minister at a general election. Each party has its own internal rules for the election of a party leader. Since 1967, the Leader of the Opposition has appointed a Shadow Ministry which offers policy alternatives and criticism on various portfolios. The Leader of the Opposition is, by convention, always a member of the House of Representatives and sits opposite the Prime Minister in the chamber. The Senate leader of the opposition party is referred to as the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate, even if they lead a majority of Senators. He or she usually has a senior Shadow Ministry role. Australia has an adversarial parliamentary system in which the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition face off against one another during debates in the House of Representatives. The Opposition’s role is to hold the government accountable to the people and to Parliament, as well as to provide alternative policies in a range of areas.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rudd Government Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–2010
    The Rudd Government Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–2010 The Rudd Government Australian Commonwealth Administration 2007–2010 Edited by Chris Aulich and Mark Evans Published by ANU E Press The Australian National University Canberra ACT 0200, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at: http://epress.anu.edu.au/rudd_citation.html National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: The Rudd government : Australian Commonwealth administration 2007 - 2010 / edited by Chris Aulich and Mark Evans. ISBN: 9781921862069 (pbk.) 9781921862076 (eBook) Notes: Includes bibliographical references. Subjects: Rudd, Kevin, 1957---Political and social views. Australian Labor Party. Public administration--Australia. Australia--Politics and government--2001- Other Authors/Contributors: Aulich, Chris, 1947- Evans, Mark Dr. Dewey Number: 324.29407 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design by ANU E Press Illustrations by David Pope, The Canberra Times Printed by Griffin Press Funding for this monograph series has been provided by the Australia and New Zealand School of Government Research Program. This edition © 2010 ANU E Press Contents Acknowledgments . vii Contributors . ix Part I. Introduction 1 . It was the best of times; it was the worst of times . 3 Chris Aulich 2 . Issues and agendas for the term . 17 John Wanna Part II. The Institutions of Government 3 . The Australian Public Service: new agendas and reform . 35 John Halligan 4 . Continuity and change in the outer public sector .
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Speech* Ken Inglis
    Parliamentary Speech* Ken Inglis Mr Speaker "Men and women of Australia". The words are Gough Whitlam’s, beginning at Bankstown the policy speech in his victorious campaign for election. They are also John Curtin’s, campaigning in 1943 for re-election, and before that, on 8 December 1941: "Men and women of Australia. We are at war with Japan." It’s less well known they are also the words of R G Menzies, speaking earlier in the war as Prime Minister. Men and women of Australia saw and heard Whitlam’s words on television. They heard Curtin’s and Menzies’ words on the radio. Only by television and radio could a political leader address the whole nation at once, though in days before radio he might use such a form of address to them as readers of his words. When Alfred Deakin delivered his policy speech for the election of 1903 he didn’t actually use the phrase; but he did address both "the men of Australia" and "the women of Australia"; and that was the first time a national party leader would think of speaking to the women, for in 1902 women had just been given the vote. The Prime Minister or Leader of the Opposition can never use that form of address in parliament. In this building he is supposed to address only the chair: Mr Speaker in the House of Representatives, Mr President in the Senate. From 1986 to 1989, Madam Speaker. Members are not delivering addresses, as on the hustings: they are engaged in debates. I’m interpreting my brief narrowly, saying little about the words politicians speak outside This is a lightly revised version of a Senate Department Occasional Lecture given in Parliament House, Canberra, on 23 February 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Anomalous Occurrences in Unusual Circumstances'? Towards a History
    ‘Anomalous Occurrences in Unusual Circumstances’? Towards a History of Extra‐ Judicial Activity by High Court Justices Fiona Wheeler* High Court of Australia Public Lecture High Court of Australia Canberra 30 November 2011 Justices, distinguished guests, ladies and gentlemen, it is indeed a great privilege to be invited here this evening to speak in the High Court of Australia Public Lecture series, following in the footsteps, earlier this year, of my colleague and friend, Professor John Williams of the University of Adelaide. I’d like to begin by thanking the Court and its staff and to acknowledge all who have helped to make this lecture possible, especially Dr Hanna Jaireth, the Court’s Public Information Manager. Introduction – Judicial Independence and the High Court I was drawn to this topic — the history of extra‐judicial activity by High Court Justices — by two things: first, my longstanding interest as a constitutional lawyer in the independence of the judiciary from the other branches of government and secondly, by my closely related interest in the High Court of Australia itself. The independence of the judiciary from government is a fundamental principle of Australian democracy. It forms part of our common law inheritance and is embedded in Chapter III of the Australian Constitution. Its rationale is both simple and compelling. Keeping the judiciary apart from the legislature and the executive promotes public confidence in judicial impartiality which is pivotal to acceptance of * ANU College of Law, ANU. The quote in the title is from Wainohu v New South Wales (2011) 243 CLR 181, 199 (French CJ and Kiefel J) (footnote omitted).
    [Show full text]
  • A Centenary of Achievement National Party of Australia 1920-2020
    Milestone A Centenary of Achievement National Party of Australia 1920-2020 Paul Davey Milestone: A Centenary of Achievement © Paul Davey 2020 First published 2020 Published by National Party of Australia, John McEwen House, 7 National Circuit, Bar- ton, ACT 2600. Printed by Homestead Press Pty Ltd 3 Paterson Parade, Queanbeyan NSW 2620 ph 02 6299 4500 email <[email protected]> Cover design and layout by Cecile Ferguson <[email protected]> This work is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to the author by email to <[email protected]> or to the National Party of Australia at <[email protected]> Author: Davey, Paul Title: Milestone/A Centenary of Achievement – National Party of Australia 1920-2020 Edition: 1st ed ISBN: 978-0-6486515-1-2 (pbk) Subjects: Australian Country Party 1920-1975 National Country Party of Australia 1975-1982 National Party of Australia 1982- Australia – Politics and government 20th century Australia – Politics and government – 2001- Published with the support of John McEwen House Pty Ltd, Canberra Printed on 100 per cent recycled paper ii Milestone: A Centenary of Achievement “Having put our hands to the wheel, we set the course of our voyage. … We have not entered upon this course without the most grave consideration.” (William McWilliams on the formation of the Australian Country Party, Commonwealth Parliamentary Debates, 10 March 1920, p. 250) “We conceive our role as a dual one of being at all times the specialist party with a sharp fighting edge, the specialists for rural industries and rural communities.
    [Show full text]