I Received a Google Shopping Invoice
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
NOP and NOP Comments
NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE AVALON WEST VALLEY EXPANSION PROJECT April 2018 Introduction The purpose of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) is to inform decision makers and the general public of the environmental effects of the proposed project that an agency may implement or approve. The EIR process is intended to provide information sufficient to evaluate a project and its potential for significant impacts on the environment; to examine methods of reducing adverse impacts; and to consider alternatives to the project. The EIR for the proposed project will be prepared and processed in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) of 1970, as amended. In accordance with the requirements of CEQA, the EIR will include the following: A summary of the project; A project description; A description of the existing environmental setting, environmental impacts, and mitigation measures for the project; Alternatives to the project as proposed; and Environmental consequences, including (a) any significant environmental effects which cannot be avoided if the project is implemented; (b) any significant irreversible and irretrievable commitment of resources; (c) the growth inducing impacts of the proposed project; and (d) cumulative impacts Project Location The 18.9-acre project site is comprised of six parcels (APNs 299-37-024, -026, -030, -031, -032, and -033) located east of Saratoga Avenue, between Blackford Avenue and Manzanita Drive in the City of San José. Regional, vicinity, and project site maps of the project site are shown in Figure 1 to Figure 3, respectively. Project Description The project site is currently developed with 873 residential apartment units and three parking structures (the Saratoga Garage, the Manzanita Garage, and the Eaves Garage). -
Critical Analysis of Google's Organisational Culture
Critical Analysis of Google’s Organisational Culture Zisong SONG School of Economics, Finance & Management, University of Bristol DOI: 10.12184/wspciWSP2516-252705.20200401 1. Introduction ccording to Steiber and Alänge (2016, p.93), organisational culture is a crucial A factor that helps companies to achieve success, which depends on the belief system of the employees and the company’s management style. The cool culture of new tech industries will be argued in this essay, and the cool culture will be assumed as a culture that satisfies employees and to help them work effectively. Google will be analysed because Google is one of few and representative new tech companies with the fastest growth, meanwhile, famous for its culture (Tran 2017, p.2). For analysing this cool culture and what beyond of cool culture, the Schein’s iceberg model and Maslow’s (1954) hierarchy of needs will be selected as tools to reveal cool culture of google. This analysis on the basis of two perspectives which as culture and motivation. Schein’s iceberg will be used by analysing culture parts, and Maslow’s hierarchy of needs will concentrate on the motivation part. The anal- ysis of cool culture is composed of motivation and culture. Maslow’s hierarchy of needs will be the foothold of criteria for evaluating whether Google’s organisational culture is cool. The Schein’s iceberg models for analysing Google’ culture, which from three aspects to evaluate its associated with motivations in order to evaluate its culture. The new tech industries’ cool culture is beneficial to enhance employee’s productivities and creativities to some extents but a shield for protecting some neg- ative information that they expect to cover. -
Hewitt V. Google
Case 5:21-cv-02155 Document 1 Filed 03/26/21 Page 1 of 118 1 Lesley Weaver (Cal. Bar No.191305) Mitchell M. Breit (pro hac vice to be sought) Matthew S. Melamed (Cal. Bar No. Jason ‘Jay’ Barnes (pro hac vice to be sought) 2 260272) An Truong (pro hac vice to be sought) Anne K. Davis (Cal. Bar No. 267909) Eric Johnson (pro hac vice to be sought) 3 Angelica M. Ornelas (Cal. Bar No. 285929) SIMMONS HANLY CONROY LLC Joshua D. Samra (Cal. Bar No. 313050) 112 Madison Avenue, 7th Floor 4 BLEICHMAR FONTI & AULD LLP New York, NY 10016 555 12th Street, Suite 1600 Tel.: (212) 784-6400 5 Oakland, CA 94607 Fax: (212) 213-5949 Tel.: (415) 445-4003 [email protected] 6 Fax: (415) 445-4020 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 7 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 8 [email protected] [email protected] 9 Elizabeth C. Pritzker (Cal. Bar No. 146267) 10 Jonathan K. Levine (Cal Bar No. 220289) Caroline C. Corbitt (Cal Bar No. 305492) 11 PRITZKER LEVINE LLP 1900 Powell Street, Suite 450 12 Emeryville, CA 94608 Tel.: (415) 692-0772 13 Fax: (415) 366-6110 [email protected] 14 [email protected] [email protected] 15 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 16 17 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 19 20 BENJAMIN HEWITT and KIMBERLEY No. ___________________________ WOODRUFF, on behalf of themselves and 21 all others similarly situated, CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT 22 Plaintiffs, 23 v. -
AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT § LLC, § Case No
Case 2:19-cv-00361-JRG Document 1 Filed 11/04/19 Page 1 of 70 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION § AGIS SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT § LLC, § Case No. § Plaintiff, § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED § v. § § GOOGLE LLC, § § Defendant. § § PLAINTIFF’S ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff, AGIS Software Development LLC (“AGIS Software” or “Plaintiff”) files this original Complaint against Defendant Google LLC (“Defendant” or “Google”) for patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271 and alleges as follows: THE PARTIES 1. Plaintiff AGIS Software is a limited liability company organized and existing under the laws of the State of Texas, and maintains its principal place of business at 100 W. Houston Street, Marshall, Texas 75670. AGIS Software is the owner of all right, title, and interest in and to U.S. Patent Nos. 8,213,970, 9,408,055, 9,445,251, 9,467,838, 9,749,829, and 9,820,123 (the “Patents-in-Suit”). 2. Defendant Google is a Delaware corporation and maintains its principal place of business at 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, California 94043, and may be served with process via its registered agent, Corporation Service Company at 251 Little Falls Drive, Wilmington, DE 19808. Upon information and belief, Google does business in Texas, directly or through intermediaries, and offers its products and/or services, including those accused herein Case 2:19-cv-00361-JRG Document 1 Filed 11/04/19 Page 2 of 70 PageID #: 2 of infringement, to customers and potential customers located in Texas, including in the judicial Eastern District of Texas. -
Easy Ways to Make Money for Our School EVEN NOW: 1) Amazon
Easy Ways to make money for our school EVEN NOW: 1) Amazon Smile Program We know you’re shopping on Amazon during this time at home! AmazonSmile is a simple and automatic way for you to support your favorite charitable organization (GREENBRIAR WEST PTA, of course) every time you shop, at no cost to you. When you shop at smile.amazon.com, you’ll find the exact same low prices, vast selection and convenient shopping experience as Amazon.com, with the added bonus that Amazon will donate a portion of the purchase price to GREENBRIAR WEST PTA. You may also want to add a bookmark to smile.amazon.com to make it even easier to return and start your shopping at AmazonSmile. 2) BoxTops for Education: Scan those Boxtops (and clip for later)! The BoxTops program is still running and you can submit most online shopping receipts! Here is how to submit email receipts: The following email receipts are currently eligible (as of April 6, 2020): BJ's Wholesale Club, Costco, CVS, Food Lion, Fresh Direct, Giant Eagle, Google Express, Hannaford, Harris Teeter, Instacart, Jet.com, Peapod, Rite Aid, Safeway, SamsClub.com, Sams Club Scan & Go, Shipt, Target.com, Target Pick-Up/Drive-Up, Walgreens, Walmart Grocery, Walmart Pay, Walmart.com, Wegmans To ensure that earnings are properly credited to your account: 1. Make sure you have a Box Tops for Education account (you can create one via the Box Tops app or website) 2. Forward your email receipt to [email protected] using the same email that’s associated with your BTFE account 3. -
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Marshall Division
Case 2:18-cv-00499 Document 1 Filed 11/17/18 Page 1 of 44 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION UNILOC 2017 LLC and UNILOC USA, INC. § § Plaintiffs, § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-00499 § v. § § PATENT CASE GOOGLE LLC, § § Defendant. § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiffs Uniloc 2017 LLC and Uniloc USA, Inc. (together “Uniloc”), as and for their complaint against defendant Google LLC (“Google”) allege as follows: THE PARTIES 1. Uniloc 2017 LLC is a Delaware limited liability company having places of business at 620 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, California 92660 and 102 N. College Avenue, Suite 303, Tyler, Texas 75702. 2. Uniloc USA, Inc. is a Texas corporation having a place of business at Legacy Town Center I, Suite 380, 7160 Dallas Parkway, Plano, Texas 75024. 3. Uniloc holds all substantial rights, title and interest in and to the asserted patent. 4. On information and belief, Google, a Delaware corporation with its principal office at 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043. Google offers its products and/or services, including those accused herein of infringement, to customers and potential customers located in Texas and in the judicial Eastern District of Texas. JURISDICTION 5. Uniloc brings this action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the United Page 1 of 44 Case 2:18-cv-00499 Document 1 Filed 11/17/18 Page 2 of 44 PageID #: 2 States, 35 U.S.C. § 271 et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. -
Google Shopping Feed for Magento 2 User's Guide
475 River Bend Rd, Ste 200C Naperville IL 60540 USA Phone: (855) 624 3686 Email: [email protected] Support: http://help.rocketweb.com Google Shopping Feed for Magento 2 User's Guide 1. Rocket Shopping Feeds for Magento 2 . 2 1.1 Getting Started . 2 1.2 Set up Google Shopping . 3 1.2.1 Shipping and Tax . 8 1.2.2 Run Adwords campaigns . 9 1.2.3 Enable automatic items update . 11 1.2.4 Set up Google Inventory . 12 1.2.5 Google Promotions . 13 RSF M2 User's Guide Support: http://help.rocketweb.com Rocket Shopping Feeds for Magento 2 This guide covers features of the Rocket Shopping Feeds for Magento 2 extension. If you're running magento 1.x, please follow the guide for that version . Search this documentation Getting Started Installation and upgrades Set up Google Shopping Shipping and Tax Run Adwords campaigns Enable automatic items update How to use this guide Set up Google Inventory Google Promotions If you're just starting out with this product, you should follow the steps at Getting Started; otherwise, if you are looking for details on a specific configuration, use the left side navigation on this page to Feeds management find the appropriate information. Adding a feed Generating the feed Optimizing feed output Solution lookup General Configuration Columns Map Use the "search this documentation" for keywords that are relevant Categories Map to your issue. Product Filters Custom Options Get Support Configurable Products If the solution you are looking for cannot be found here, Grouped Products please submit a request using our Service Desk. -
In the Common Pleas Court Delaware County, Ohio Civil Division
IN THE COMMON PLEAS COURT DELAWARE COUNTY, OHIO CIVIL DIVISION STATE OF OHIO ex rel. DAVE YOST, OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Case No. 21 CV H________________ 30 East Broad St. Columbus, OH 43215 Plaintiff, JUDGE ___________________ v. GOOGLE LLC 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway COMPLAINT FOR Mountain View, CA 94043 DECLARATORY JUDGMENT AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Also Serve: Google LLC c/o Corporation Service Co. 50 W. Broad St., Ste. 1330 Columbus OH 43215 Defendant. Plaintiff, the State of Ohio, by and through its Attorney General, Dave Yost, (hereinafter “Ohio” or “the State”), upon personal knowledge as to its own acts and beliefs, and upon information and belief as to all matters based upon the investigation by counsel, brings this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against Google LLC (“Google” or “Defendant”), alleges as follows: I. INTRODUCTION The vast majority of Ohioans use the internet. And nearly all of those who do use Google Search. Google is so ubiquitous that its name has become a verb. A person does not have to sign a contract, buy a specific device, or pay a fee to use Good Search. Google provides its CLERK OF COURTS - DELAWARE COUNTY, OH - COMMON PLEAS COURT 21 CV H 06 0274 - SCHUCK, JAMES P. FILED: 06/08/2021 09:05 AM search services indiscriminately to the public. To use Google Search, all you have to do is type, click and wait. Primarily, users seek “organic search results”, which, per Google’s website, “[a] free listing in Google Search that appears because it's relevant to someone’s search terms.” In lieu of charging a fee, Google collects user data, which it monetizes in various ways—primarily via selling targeted advertisements. -
Google Has Been Muscling Into New Web Markets and Greatly Expanding Its Dominance of Other Businesses Since Adopting in 2007 A
TRAFFIC REPORT: HOW GOOGLE IS SQUEEZING OUT COMPETITORS AND MUSCLING INTO NEW MARKETS A Study by INSIDE GOOGLE JUNE 2, 2010 1 Executive Summary Google has been muscling into new web markets and greatly expanding its dominance of other web commerce sectors since 2007, when the web search giant adopted a controversial new business practice aimed at steering Internet searchers to its own services. Google's dramatic gains are revealed by an analysis of internet traffic data for more than 100 popular websites. Once upon a time, these sites primarily benefited from Google. Now, they must also compete with it. In the most comprehensive study of its kind to date, INSIDE GOOGLE obtained three years of traffic data from the respected web metrics firm Experian Hitwise, allowing an analysis of Google's business practices and performance that is unprecedented in scope. The data shows that Google has established a Microsoft-like monopoly in some key areas of the web. In video, Google has nearly doubled its market share to almost 80%. That is the legal definition of a monopoly, according to the federal courts, which have held that a firm achieves "monopoly power" when it gains between 70% and 80% of a market.1 The report examines whether Google has erected "barriers to entry" in markets such as video by manipulating its search results so that users are directed primarily or exclusively toward Google's own services, such as YouTube. Google’s dominance in video and its huge gains in other markets such as local search and comparison shopping correlates with these increasing efforts by Google to promote its own services within search results. -
A Study on the Factors Influencing Purchasing Motive of Customers in Online Shopping
© 2020 JETIR November 2020, Volume 7, Issue 11 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) A STUDY ON THE FACTORS INFLUENCING PURCHASING MOTIVE OF CUSTOMERS IN ONLINE SHOPPING Sajisha CM1 Dr.K.Kumuda Devi2 1 PhD Scholar, Rathinam Arts & Science College, Eachanari 2 Dean, School of Commerce, KPR College of Arts Science & Research, Coimbatore ABSTRACT: Majority people spent a large amount of time in shopping. The decision for select an item takes a long time. Travelling and buying an item may take a day, week or a month. But now it can be easier by online shopping. Online consumers are increasing day by day. Youth prefer online to meet their requirements. In the busy world, no one have time to go out and buy. So consumers choose online shopping instead of direct shopping. Keyword: Online consumers, satisfaction, websites, etc INTRODUCTION E-commerce also called Internet marketing, Online shopping etc. In the modern era the role of E-commerce is increasing at an increasing rate. It means the customer-retailer relationship achieved without face to face interaction. In E-commerce the transactions are fully done through electronically. Online shopping eliminates the intermediary function. Even though Amazon, Flipkart are widely used. Now-a-days big retailing companies are also entered in E-commerce. They offer their product and services at an attractive form and give the opportunity to customers to select as per their wish using a credit card , debit card, paytm, by cash on delivery etc.. The customers also have the right to cancel the order and return the product without losing their money. -
Download the File
“DON’T BE EVIL”: GOOGLE’S LABOR, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE LIMITS OF CORPORATE GOOD A thesis submitted to the faculty of San Francisco State University In partial fulfillment of %o IS the requirements for VvlOV\Sl the Degree •V45 Master of Arts In Women and Gender Studies by Alison Agnes Veith San Francisco, California May 2015 Copyright by Alison Agnes Veith 2015 CERTIFICATION OF APPROVAL I certify that I have read “Don't Be Evil”: Google’s Labor, Technology, and the Limits o f Corporate Good by Alison Agnes Veith, and that in my opinion this work meets the criteria for approving a thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree Master of Arts in Women and Gender Studies at San Francisco State University. Kasturi Ray, Ph.D Associate Professor Evren Savci, Ph.D Assistant Professor “DON’T BE EVIL”: GOOGLE’S LABOR, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE LIMITS OF CORPORATE GOOD Alison Agnes Veith San Francisco, California 2015 Google’s “Don’t Be Evil” motto and its public image as corporate do-gooder are examined through a material and cultural analysis of its internal labor hierarchies and its technological products. By focusing on Google’s hidden contracted reproductive service laborers, as well as the premises and consequences of disruptive, digital technology, this project reveals how the realities of necessary but undesirable work are obscured and contested. This dual focus allows for a revaluation of intimate labors in two ways. First, it reveals that Google’s sustained capital accumulation relies on its reproductive intimate labor. Second, it recognizes that Google’s corporate practices of invisibilizing intimate labor and mediating social intimacies are importantly reflective of the larger social, economic, and cultural trends in our emerging knowledge-based/service-based economy. -
In the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Marshall Division
Case 2:18-cv-00549 Document 1 Filed 12/30/18 Page 1 of 40 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION UNILOC 2017 LLC § Plaintiff, § CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:18-cv-00549 § v. § § PATENT CASE GOOGLE LLC, § § Defendant. § JURY TRIAL DEMANDED § ORIGINAL COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT Plaintiff Uniloc 2017 LLC (“Uniloc”), as and for their complaint against defendant Google LLC (“Google”) allege as follows: THE PARTIES 1. Uniloc is a Delaware limited liability company having places of business at 620 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, California 92660 and 102 N. College Avenue, Suite 303, Tyler, Texas 75702. 2. Uniloc holds all substantial rights, title and interest in and to the asserted patent. 3. On information and belief, Google, a Delaware corporation with its principal office at 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043. Google offers its products and/or services, including those accused herein of infringement, to customers and potential customers located in Texas and in the judicial Eastern District of Texas. JURISDICTION 4. Uniloc brings this action for patent infringement under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 271 et seq. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a). Page 1 of 40 Case 2:18-cv-00549 Document 1 Filed 12/30/18 Page 2 of 40 PageID #: 2 5. This Court has personal jurisdiction over Google in this action because Google has committed acts within the Eastern District of Texas giving rise to this action and has established minimum contacts with this forum such that the exercise of jurisdiction over Google would not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.