DOCSLIB.ORG

Cougar Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cougar Management Plan 2017 Oregon Cougar Management Plan Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife October 2017 2017 Oregon Cougar Management Plan Adopted October 2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY October 2017 The 2017 Oregon Cougar Management Plan updates the 2006 Oregon Cougar Management Plan. This update will guide Oregon’s cougar management, and provides strategies for resolution of human conflicts with cougars. This plan revision process was initiated in April 2016 when two panels of invited stakeholders provided testimony and written recommendations at the April Commission meeting. Next steps included stakeholder meetings in late summer and a staff presentation and public testimony at the October Commission Meeting. Informal/impromptu communications occurred with local sporting groups, state agencies, landowner groups, wildlife researchers, and other interested parties throughout the entire duration of this process. The draft plan chapters include information on Oregon cougars; cougar management objectives; and cougar management goals incorporated into an adaptive management approach for the future. These chapters contain a significant amount of information and data on cougar biology, population trends, research findings, damage and conflict, and management activities. Similar to the 2006 Plan, this draft plan establishes objectives that seek to maintain viable and healthy cougar populations in Oregon, reduce conflicts with cougars, and manage cougars in a manner compatible with other game mammal species. Objective 1 seeks to manage the state’s cougar population at a level well above that required for long term sustainability. Achieving and monitoring this objective is complicated but empirical data and numerous indices can be used to assess population status. Because the minimum population objective is well above the level of sustainability, and because of the demonstrated resilience of cougar populations (Cougar Management Guidelines, 2005, page 40), exact counts of cougars are not necessary to achieve Objective 1. To accomplish this objective, several strategies have been employed. Zone management with mortality quotas will be used to ensure harvest does not reduce the population below objective levels. Harvest can occur at three levels of intensity to allow for maintenance of source and sink populations. Two indicators of cougar abundance will be used. A deterministic, density dependent population model, which utilizes data collected from all cougar mortalities in Oregon, will be used for predicting outcomes on a short- term basis in an adaptive management approach (Cougar Management Guidelines, 2005, page 58). Proportion of adult females in the harvest will also be used to monitor cougar population trajectory. In addition, data will continue to be collected in more intensive, smaller scale research studies (Cougar Management Guidelines, 2005, page 77) as well as developing alternative population models that could incorporate stochastic variability for each zone. Objectives 2 – 3 address solving conflict. The primary strategy to solve conflict since 1995 has been to give advice and, when necessary, remove the problem animal. While damage and conflict have remained relatively stable in much of Oregon, conflict has increased as cougars have expanded into previously unoccupied habitats of human habitation. Human population increases in some parts of the state have exacerbated the problem. Steps necessary to achieve these objectives are straightforward and do not depend on cougar population estimates. In addition to advice and removal of specific cougars, specific areas with elevated conflict may also be targeted to reduce conflict by reducing cougar numbers. These targeted areas are intended to create a buffer of low i 2017 Oregon Cougar Management Plan Adopted October 2017 cougar density, thereby reducing conflict. Objective 4 seeks to achieve established management objectives for other game mammal species. Only those Wildlife Management Units (WMU’s) where elk or deer populations are below established management objectives, have shown a history of decline and lack of ability to sustain themselves, and where evidence indicates cougar predation is a primary factor may be targeted for cougar population reduction. For bighorn sheep, areas around specific herds will be targeted when evidence indicates cougar predation is a primary factor. All management activities will be carried out in an adaptive management approach, as suggested in the Cougar Management Guidelines (2005, pages 74 and 81), which allows for monitoring, evaluation, and changes in management based on results. Those strategies that are not successful at meeting stated objectives would be modified or discontinued. Numerous indicators will be used to monitor success. Total mortality, hunter harvest success rates, and biological data will continue to be collected. These data will contribute to population modeling for each Cougar Management Zone. Cougar-human conflict will continue to be monitored using non-hunting mortalities and complaints concerning human safety, pets, and livestock. Research projects will collect information on movements, density, predation rates, and will be able to better detect other factors such as disease. ODFW’s mission is to protect and enhance Oregon’s fish and wildlife and their habitats for use and enjoyment by present and future generations. Cougar management is complicated by the dichotomy of sentiment toward cougars among Oregon residents. This plan presents ODFW’s strategy to meet its mission and incorporate public attitudes and desires. It is a plan that will be updated and rewritten as agency policies, new biological data, and human and/or cougar populations change. ii 2017 Oregon Cougar Management Plan Adopted October 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................... i TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................................. vii PURPOSE OF THE PLAN ..................................................................................................................... viii CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 CHAPTER II: INFORMATION ON OREGON COUGARS ................................................................ 4 History and Range .................................................................................................................................. 4 Reproduction and Productivity ............................................................................................................. 6 Dispersal and Connectivity .................................................................................................................... 6 Landscape Genetics ................................................................................................................................ 7 Density ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 Cougar Interactions with Ungulates ................................................................................................... 10 Cougar Interactions with Other Carnivores ...................................................................................... 15 Cougar Habitat...................................................................................................................................... 18 Habitat Distribution .......................................................................................................................... 19 Cougars and Urban Landscapes ...................................................................................................... 20 Age and Sex Structure .......................................................................................................................... 22 Hunting and Hunter Harvest ............................................................................................................... 26 License and Tags ............................................................................................................................... 26 Hunting Techniques and Harvest .................................................................................................... 27 Hunt Structure .................................................................................................................................. 27 Impact of Hunting on Cougar Populations ..................................................................................... 28 Impact of Hunting on Population Trajectory in Oregon .............................................................. 29 Illegal Kill .............................................................................................................................................. 32 Damage and Safety Mortalities ............................................................................................................ 32 Administrative Removals ....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2020-2021 Arizona Hunting Regulations
    Arizona Game and Fish Department 2020-2021 Arizona Hunting Regulations This publication includes the annual regulations for statewide hunting of deer, fall turkey, fall javelina, bighorn sheep, fall bison, fall bear, mountain lion, small game and other huntable wildlife. The hunt permit application deadline is Tuesday, June 9, 2020, at 11:59 p.m. Arizona time. Purchase Arizona hunting licenses and apply for the draw online at azgfd.gov. Report wildlife violations, call: 800-352-0700 Two other annual hunt draw booklets are published for the spring big game hunts and elk and pronghorn hunts. i Unforgettable Adventures. Feel-Good Savings. Heed the call of adventure with great insurance coverage. 15 minutes could save you 15% or more on motorcycle insurance. geico.com | 1-800-442-9253 | Local Office Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states, in all GEICO companies, or in all situations. Motorcycle and ATV coverages are underwritten by GEICO Indemnity Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, DC 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. © 2019 GEICO ii ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT — AZGFD.GOV AdPages2019.indd 4 4/20/2020 11:49:25 AM AdPages2019.indd 5 2020-2021 ARIZONA HUNTING4/20/2020 REGULATIONS 11:50:24 AM 1 Arizona Game and Fish Department Key Contacts MAIN NUMBER: 602-942-3000 Choose 1 for known extension or name Choose 2 for draw, bonus points, and hunting and fishing license information Choose 3 for watercraft Choose 4 for regional
    [Show full text]
  • Art Astronomy Baseball Bicycling Birds
    Morrison Park A 1187 Rogue River Hwy. Art 2 courts, lighted Westholm Park Artist’s Association Josephine Co. Corner of SW Wildwood and I Streets Carol Smith 541-479-1602 1 court, unlighted Enjoy monthly meetings at the Fruitdale Grange that in- Redwood Park clude short business updates, artist exhibit news, network- 1395 Dowell Road ing and refreshments, followed by demonstrations, pres- 1 court, unlighted entations, critiques or idea sharing sessions. Call for meeting information. Bicycling VacieAnna Berry’s Whitehorse Studio Bicycle Safety 220 NW 6th St., #206 Crime Prevention Office 541-450-6200 541-474-9430 Art classes offered for ages 5-18 years. (Some adult in- BMX struction available.) Small groups or individual. Tuition River City BMX includes all supplies. Studio located above the TaeKwonDo 1380 Pansy Lane studio on 6th St. 541-471-0269 Racing every Tuesday and Saturday year-round. Astronomy Grants Pass Skate Park Grants Pass Astronomers 820 SE M Street John Bunyan 541-226-6135 541-471-6435 www.grantspassastronomers.com Bike hours at the skate park 10 AM to 12 Noon, 3 PM to 4 Scope loaner program, club meetings, star parties. PM, daily. Helmets required. Clubs/Rentals B BikeKraft Baseball 785 Rogue River Hwy American Legion Baseball 541-476-4935 GPNuggetsBaseball.org Year-round weekly bike rides for advanced mountain bike Rick Chapman 541-479-5757 riders. Riders meet every Wednesday at 6:00 PM. Bring Grants Pass Little League helmet and water. Call Richard for more information. American League (north of the Rogue River) Don’s Bike Center Hotline 541-787-5037 211 SW G St National League (south of the Rogue River) 541-471-3494 Hotline 541-441-8256 Rogue Valley Mountain Biking Club Boys and Girls Club 541-479-5258 Basketball For youth 10-18 years of age.
    [Show full text]
  • New Wildfire in Trout Creek Mountains Area
    Contact: Tara Martinak (541) 573-4400 Release No. OR-BU-12-23 July 25, 2012, 9:00 a.m. NEW WILDFIRE IN TROUT CREEK MOUNTAINS HINES, Ore. – Two random lightning strikes in southeast Oregon late Tuesday afternoon ignited a new wildfire near Red Mountain in the Trout Creek Mountains area. The “Water Tower” fire received quick attention from engine crews soon after its start and reportedly laid down until sporadic winds brought the fire back to life around 11:00 p.m. This morning, crews estimate the fire to be approximately 3-500 acres. At least three area ranches with structures are within the fire vicinity though not immediately threatened. Livestock grazing allotments, inaccessible terrain, private inholdings and Sage Grouse core habitat are also concerns. With high fuel loads of grass and brush from two seasons of productive growth and low winter snow pack, fire spread could be rapid and intense in this area. Longer burn periods and elevated fire intensity extending after sunrise can also be expected. Five Single Engine Air Tankers, three helicopters, numerous engines and dozers will support the suppression operation throughout the day. Heavy air tankers have been ordered for availability if needed. Updated information on the Water Tower fire will be released as conditions change and improve. The High Desert Type 3 Incident Management (Toney) is assigned to the Water Tower fire. The Miller Homestead fire, which started Sunday, July 8, is currently estimated at 95 percent contained. Dry peat soils in the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge continue to burn below the surface, presenting a unique challenge for firefighters.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Aspects of Western Gray Squirrel Ecology
    Behavioral aspects of western gray squirrel ecology Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Cross, Stephen P. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 11/10/2021 06:42:38 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/565181 BEHAVIORAL ASPECTS OF WESTERN GRAY SQUIRREL ECOLOGY by Stephen Paul Cross A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of. the DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WITH A MAJOR IN ZOOLOGY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 6 9 THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE I hereby recommend that this dissertation prepared under my direction by St e p h e n Paul Cross_______________________________ entitled B E H A V I O R A L A S P E C T S OF W E S T E R N G RAY__________ S Q U I R R E L E C O LOGY___________________________________ be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement of the degree of D O C T O R OF P H I L O S O P H Y_____________________________ Dissertation Director Date After inspection of the final copy of the dissertation, the following members of the Final Examination Committee concur in its approval and recommend its acceptance:* This approval and acceptance is contingent on the candidate's adequate performance and defense of this dissertation at the final oral examination.
    [Show full text]
  • Educator's Guide
    Educator’s Guide the jill and lewis bernard family Hall of north american mammals inside: • Suggestions to Help You come prepared • essential questions for Student Inquiry • Strategies for teaching in the exhibition • map of the Exhibition • online resources for the Classroom • Correlations to science framework • glossary amnh.org/namammals Essential QUESTIONS Who are — and who were — the North as tundra, winters are cold, long, and dark, the growing season American Mammals? is extremely short, and precipitation is low. In contrast, the abundant precipitation and year-round warmth of tropical All mammals on Earth share a common ancestor and and subtropical forests provide optimal growing conditions represent many millions of years of evolution. Most of those that support the greatest diversity of species worldwide. in this hall arose as distinct species in the relatively recent Florida and Mexico contain some subtropical forest. In the past. Their ancestors reached North America at different boreal forest that covers a huge expanse of the continent’s times. Some entered from the north along the Bering land northern latitudes, winters are dry and severe, summers moist bridge, which was intermittently exposed by low sea levels and short, and temperatures between the two range widely. during the Pleistocene (2,588,000 to 11,700 years ago). Desert and scrublands are dry and generally warm through- These migrants included relatives of New World cats (e.g. out the year, with temperatures that may exceed 100°F and dip sabertooth, jaguar), certain rodents, musk ox, at least two by 30 degrees at night. kinds of elephants (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting Deer in California
    HUNTING DEER IN CALIFORNIA We hope this guide will help deer hunters by encouraging a greater understanding of the various subspecies of mule deer found in California and explaining effective hunting techniques for various situations and conditions encountered throughout the state during general and special deer seasons. Second Edition August 2002 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Arnold Schwarzenegger, Governor DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME L. Ryan Broddrick, Director WILDLIFE PROGRAMS BRANCH David S. Zezulak, Ph.D., Chief Written by John Higley Technical Advisors: Don Koch; Eric Loft, Ph.D.; Terry M. Mansfield; Kenneth Mayer; Sonke Mastrup; Russell C. Mohr; David O. Smith; Thomas B. Stone Graphic Design and Layout: Lorna Bernard and Dana Lis Cover Photo: Steve Guill Funded by the Deer Herd Management Plan Implementation Program TABLE OF CON T EN T S INTRODUCT I ON ................................................................................................................................................5 CHAPTER 1: THE DEER OF CAL I FORN I A .........................................................................................................7 Columbian black-tailed deer ....................................................................................................................8 California mule deer ................................................................................................................................8 Rocky Mountain mule deer .....................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • The Native Trouts of the Genus Salmo of Western North America
    CItiEt'SW XHPYTD: RSOTLAITYWUAS 4 Monograph of ha, TEMPI, AZ The Native Trouts of the Genus Salmo Of Western North America Robert J. Behnke "9! August 1979 z 141, ' 4,W \ " • ,1■\t 1,es. • . • • This_report was funded by USDA, Forest Service Fish and Wildlife Service , Bureau of Land Management FORE WARD This monograph was prepared by Dr. Robert J. Behnke under contract funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the U.S. Forest Service. Region 2 of the Forest Service was assigned the lead in coordinating this effort for the Forest Service. Each agency assumed the responsibility for reproducing and distributing the monograph according to their needs. Appreciation is extended to the Bureau of Land Management, Denver Service Center, for assistance in publication. Mr. Richard Moore, Region 2, served as Forest Service Coordinator. Inquiries about this publication should be directed to the Regional Forester, 11177 West 8th Avenue, P.O. Box 25127, Lakewood, Colorado 80225. Rocky Mountain Region September, 1980 Inquiries about this publication should be directed to the Regional Forester, 11177 West 8th Avenue, P.O. Box 25127, Lakewood, Colorado 80225. it TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Preface ..................................................................................................................................................................... Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska's Predator Control Programs
    Alaska’sAlaska’s PredatorPredator ControlControl ProgramsPrograms Managing for Abundance or Abundant Mismanagement? In 1995, Alaska Governor Tony Knowles responded to negative publicity over his state’s predator control programs by requesting a National Academy of Sciences review of Alaska’s entire approach to predator control. Following the review Governor Knowles announced that no program should be considered unless it met three criteria: cost-effectiveness, scientific scrutiny and broad public acceptability. The National Academy of Sciences’ National Research Council (NRC) released its review, Wolves, Bears, and Their Prey in Alaska, in 1997, drawing conclusions and making recommendations for management of Alaska’s predators and prey. In 1996, prior to the release of the NRC report, the Wolf Management Reform Coalition, a group dedicated to promoting fair-chase hunting and responsible management of wolves in Alaska, published Showdown in Alaska to document the rise of wolf control in Alaska and the efforts undertaken to stop it. This report, Alaska’s Predator Control Programs: Managing for Abundance or Abundant Mismanagement? picks up where that 1996 report left off. Acknowledgements Authors: Caroline Kennedy, Theresa Fiorino Editor: Kate Davies Designer: Pete Corcoran DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native wild animals and plants in their natural communities. www.defenders.org Cover photo: © Nick Jans © 2011 Defenders of Wildlife 1130 17th Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036-4604 202.682.9400 333 West 4th Avenue, Suite 302 Anchorage, AK 99501 907.276.9453 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 2 2. The National Research Council Review ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Squirrels
    Tree Squirrels When the public is polled regarding suburban and urban wildlife, tree squirrels generally rank first as problem makers. Residents complain about them nesting in homes and exploiting bird feeders. Interestingly, squirrels almost always rank first among preferred urban/suburban wildlife species. Such is the Figure 1. The Eastern gray squirrel is from the deciduous paradox they present: We want them and we don’t and mixed coniferous-deciduous forests of eastern North want them, depending on what they are doing at any America, and was introduced into city parks, campuses, given moment. and estates in Washington in the early 1900s. (Drawing by Elva Paulson) Although tree squirrels spend a considerable amount of time on the ground, unlike the related ground squirrels, they are more at home in trees. Washington is home to four species of native tree squirrels and two species of introduced tree squirrels. Native Washington Tree Squirrels The Douglas squirrel, or chickaree (Tamiasciurus douglasii) measures 10 to 14 inches in length, including its tail. Its upper parts are reddish-or brownish-gray, and its underparts are orange to yellowish. The Douglas squirrel is found in stands of fir, pine, cedar, and other conifers in the Cascade Mountains and western parts of Washington. The red squirrel (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus, Fig. 4) is about the same size as the Douglas squirrel and lives in coniferous forests and semi-open woods in northeast Washington. It is rusty-red on the upper part and white or grayish white on its underside. The Western gray squirrel (Sciurus griseus, Fig. 2) is the largest tree squirrel in Washington, ranging from 18 to 24 inches in length.
    [Show full text]
  • A Bibliography of Klamath Mountains Geology, California and Oregon
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY A bibliography of Klamath Mountains geology, California and Oregon, listing authors from Aalto to Zucca for the years 1849 to mid-1995 Compiled by William P. Irwin Menlo Park, California Open-File Report 95-558 1995 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards (or with the North American Stratigraphic Code). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. PREFACE This bibliography of Klamath Mountains geology was begun, although not in a systematic or comprehensive way, when, in 1953, I was assigned the task of preparing a report on the geology and mineral resources of the drainage basins of the Trinity, Klamath, and Eel Rivers in northwestern California. During the following 40 or more years, I maintained an active interest in the Klamath Mountains region and continued to collect bibliographic references to the various reports and maps of Klamath geology that came to my attention. When I retired in 1989 and became a Geologist Emeritus with the Geological Survey, I had a large amount of bibliographic material in my files. Believing that a comprehensive bibliography of a region is a valuable research tool, I have expended substantial effort to make this bibliography of the Klamath Mountains as complete as is reasonably feasible. My aim was to include all published reports and maps that pertain primarily to the Klamath Mountains, as well as all pertinent doctoral and master's theses.
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanic Legacy
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacifi c Southwest Region VOLCANIC LEGACY March 2012 SCENIC BYWAY ALL AMERICAN ROAD Interpretive Plan For portions through Lassen National Forest, Lassen Volcanic National Park, Klamath Basin National Wildlife Refuge Complex, Tule Lake, Lava Beds National Monument and World War II Valor in the Pacific National Monument 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................4 Background Information ........................................................................................................................4 Management Opportunities ....................................................................................................................5 Planning Assumptions .............................................................................................................................6 BYWAY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................7 Management Goals ..................................................................................................................................7 Management Objectives ..........................................................................................................................7 Visitor Experience Goals ........................................................................................................................7 Visitor
    [Show full text]
  • Should We Hunt Gray Wolves in Michigan?
    SHOULD WE HUNT GRAY WOLVES IN MICHIGAN? AUGUST 2018 Dean’s Welcome Welcome, SEAS students! Before you know it, you will be boarding a bus with your classmates, headed for the University of Michigan Biological Station (the “Biostation”) in beautiful Northern Michigan—or “Up North” as Michiganders call it. There, during an immersive orientation experience, you will explore, learn, bond—and become an integral part of our community. This is just the beginning of your graduate career at SEAS, throughout which we will work together to solve some of the world’s most complex environmental problems. This is why you chose SEAS, and why we chose you. It is all very exciting, and we cannot wait to get started. So, why wait? The following case study details an active issue in the state of Michigan: whether or not to allow a public wolf hunt. During your time at the Biostation, you will be asked to examine the issue from opposing, nuanced perspectives, challenging your own gut reaction to the problem. Discussions will be guided by the scientific, political, economic, and social analyses included in these pages. You will actively collaborate with your classmates to uncover and synthesize facts, ultimately building a responsible, sustainable policy recommendation on Michigan’s wolf population. To prepare, simply read the case study and let it simmer. There is no need to do additional research. Enjoy your time at orientation. Get to know your classmates. Explore the gorgeous landscape. And then, come September 4th, join us back at the Dana Building ready to launch your graduate education and set out on a path of meaningful work—work that will have an impact on generations to come.
    [Show full text]