Lessons to Be Learned from the History of Anatomical Teaching In

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lessons to Be Learned from the History of Anatomical Teaching In RELEVANT REVIEW Lessons to be Learned From the History of Anatomical Teaching in the United States: The Example of the University of Michigan Sabine Hildebrandt* Division of Anatomical Sciences, Office of Medical Education, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan Although traditional departments of anatomy are vanishing from medical school rosters, anatomical education still remains an important part of the professional training of physicians. It is of some interest to examine whether history can teach us anything about how to reform modern anatomy. Are there lessons to be learned from the history of ana- tomical teaching in the United States that can help in the formulation of contents and purposes of a new anatomy? This question is explored by a review of US anatomical teaching with special reference to Franklin Paine Mall and the University of Michigan Medical School. An historical perspective reveals that there is a tradition of US anatomi- cal teaching and research that is characterized by a zeal for reform and innovation, scien- tific endeavor, and active, student-driven learning. Further, there is a tradition of high standards in anatomical teaching through the teachers’ engagement in scientific anatomy and of adaptability to new requirements. These traditional strengths can inform the innovation of modern anatomy in terms of its two duties—its duty to anatomy as a science and its duty toward anatomical education. Anat Sci Educ 3:202–212, 2010 © 2010 American Association of Anatomists. Key words: history of anatomy; anatomical education; reform of modern anatomy; University of Michigan; Franklin P. Mall; ethics in anatomy; review INTRODUCTION courses that include formal anatomical training and the clas- sic learning tool of student dissection of the human body It is a curious fact that anatomy, the subject that served as a (Drake et al., 2009). Even where dissection is no longer per- leading science in the founding of medical schools, is today formed, the teaching of the structure of the human body by frequently missing from departmental rosters of medical other means is central to the education of future medical doc- teaching institutions in the United States. Classical depart- tors (McLachlan and Patten, 2006). Whether viewed as a ments of anatomy have been replaced by departments of cell research or teaching endeavor, academic anatomy has biology, subsumed into clinical departments like surgery, or changed considerably and questions must be raised concern- transformed into smaller units of medical education depart- ing the contents and purposes of a new anatomy. The aim of ments. Nevertheless, most medical schools still offer anatomy this article is to investigate this problem by reviewing the his- tory of anatomical education in the United States, with the *Correspondence to: Dr. Sabine Hildebrandt, Division of Anatomical University of Michigan as an example, to formulate sugges- Sciences, Office of Medical Education, University of Michigan tions for the future duties of anatomy. Medical School, 3767 Medical Science Building II, Catherine Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0608, USA. E-mail: [email protected] Received 20 April 2010; Revised 20 May 2010; Accepted 10 June THE BEGINNINGS OF ANATOMY IN 2010. THE UNITED STATES Published online 9 July 2010 in Wiley InterScience (www. interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/ase.166 In her biography of the anatomist Franklin Paine Mall, his pupil Florence Sabin, the first woman to become a full profes- © 2010 American Association of Anatomists sor of anatomy in the United States, quotes Dixon Ryan Fox Anat Sci Educ 3:202–212 (2010) JULY/AUGUST 2010 Anatomical Sciences Education in stating that the history of medical education in the United mical and pathological specimen to the university at his States is a cultural transfer from Europe that occurred in four retirement from his position of full professor of anatomy in stages (Sabin, 1934). In the beginning, a few physicians 1847 (Warren Anatomical Museum, 2010). Likewise, Thomas trained in the old country served pioneer communities. Then Dent Mu¨tter, a surgeon at Jefferson Medical College, pre- native youth interested in the medical profession traveled to sented his collection to The College of Physicians of Philadel- the mother country for training, until medical schools were phia in 1858, thus founding the Mu¨ tter Museum (Worden, established in the new country by foreign-trained teachers. 2002). Indeed, a well-stocked museum was frequently seen as Finally, the schools in the new country became adequate. an ‘‘indispensable supplement to the dissection of cadavers’’ While all these stages can be observed in the history of US and used as a selling point in circular advertisements for med- medical schools, they did not occur strictly chronologically ical educational institutions (Sappol, 2002). but coexisted over long stretches of time. The three different systems of medical education existed In the 17th and early 18th century, foreign-trained physi- concurrently throughout the 19th century and the develop- cians served their communities in the new North American ment of adequate medical schools that trained competent colonies (Sabin, 1934). William Shippen Jr. of Philadelphia physicians in the new country only began in the 1890s. What was among the young men who went to London to study were the reasons for this delay? First, quality standards for anatomy with John and William Hunter. In 1746, William medical schools were lacking. By the middle of the 19th cen- Hunter had newly introduced the ‘‘Paris manner of dissec- tury, a general decline of the quality of medical education tion,’’ which was anatomical dissection by students them- was noted (Bardeen, 1905). Hartwell traced this development selves as opposed to teaching anatomy by demonstrations back to the lack of influence of the state on the many (mostly only (Gelfand, 1972). After his return from Europe, Shippen privately owned) medical schools, thus making quality con- started the first North American medical school at the Col- trol impossible (Hartwell, 1881b). Second, Hartwell criticized lege of Philadelphia in 1765 and made anatomy the founda- the insufficient legislation concerning the provision of human tion of his medical teaching. He offered courses in anatomical bodies for anatomical dissection. In his opinion, US legisla- dissection accompanied by didactic lectures (Blake, 1955). So, tion compared unfavorably to European legislation, where from the beginning of systematic medical education in the individual states made liberal provision for anatomical insti- United States, the most modern European method of anatom- tutions by allowing them the use of unclaimed bodies of per- ical teaching, dissection by medical students, was employed sons who had died in public institutions such as hospitals and in some North American medical schools, thus promoting prisons. Third, anatomy remained the main subject of most active learning by students. Many other private physicians medical schools, but the teaching was often focused on lec- and educational institutions adopted Shippen’s example in the tures instead of dissections by students. The teachers were following decades and founded their own medical schools, physicians who taught anatomy exclusively as a clinically among them Harvard, Dartmouth, New York, and William applied discipline and they had little time for their students and Mary College by1800 (Hartwell, 1881b). and less time for innovations in the field of scientific anat- Throughout the 19th century, there existed three different omy. A fourth reason may have been the continued expansion basic systems of medical education: first, the apprenticeship of the United States into the Western territories and the with a physician; second, the proprietary school providing accompanying pioneer mentality. Fox stated: ‘‘civilization theoretical and clinical training by the physician-owner; third, [...] declines when it strikes the frontier’’ (Fox, 1927) and the university associated medical school (Halperin et al., observed a relaxation of legal standards for the practice of 2010). At the beginning of the Civil War, 85 mostly proprie- medicine and of medical standards in general far into the tary medical schools existed (Bardeen, 1905), by 1905 there 19th century. Medical educators were not unaware of these were 160 (Michels, 1987). By 1830, nearly half of all medical problems and early attempts at reform were made. In 1859, schools were located in small towns of rural America, an the Medical Department of Lind University in Chicago, a arrangement that had no equivalent in Europe but served the forerunner of Northwestern University Medical School intro- education of a significant number of physicians in the new duced a graded curriculum, and in 1857, New Orleans country (Bonner, 1995). In all the three types of medical School of Medicine decided on a thorough reform of clinical education, the teachers were practicing physicians and teaching that included active participation of students in care surgeons, who trained their students clinically in their private for patients (Ludmerer, 1985). However, these reforms were practices. Their teaching was accompanied by short courses isolated and other endeavors failed due to a lack of insight of formal lectures, mostly on clinically relevant anatomy. into the importance of experimental medicine by many clini- During this early period of US medical education, teaching cians (Bonner, 1995) and the fact that a ‘‘modern philosophy
Recommended publications
  • History of Anatomy in the Reflection of Collecting Media
    Journal of Human Anatomy MEDWIN PUBLISHERS ISSN: 2578-5079 Committed to Create Value for Researchers History of Anatomy in the Reflection of Collecting Media Bugaevsky KA* Research Article Department of Medical and Biological Foundations of Sports and Physical Rehabilitation, The Volume 5 Issue 1 Petro Mohyla Black Sea State University, Ukraine Received Date: June 30, 2021 Published Date: July 28, 2021 *Corresponding author: Konstantin Anatolyevich Bugaevsky, Assistant Professor, The DOI: 10.23880/jhua-16000154 Petro Mohyla Black Sea State University, Nikolaev, Ukraine, Tel: + (38 099) 60 98 926; Email: [email protected] Abstract contribution to the anatomical study of the human body, by famous scientists-anatomists, both antiquity and modernity, Such The article presents the materials of the study devoted to the reflection in the means of collecting, information about the as Avicenna, Ibn al-Nafiz, Andrei Vesalius, William Garvey, Ambroise Paré, Giovanni Baptista Morgagni, Miguel Servet, Gabriel Fallopius, Bartolomeo Eustachio, Leonardo da Vinci, Jan Yesenius, John Hunter, Ales Hrdlichka of the past and a number of to the development and formation of anatomy as a basic medical science, but were also the founders of a number of related others, in the reflection of various means of philately and numismatics. All these scientists made a significant contribution medical disciplines, such as pathological anatomy, operative surgery and topographic anatomy, forensic medical examination. The tools, techniques and techniques developed by them for the autopsy of corpses and the preparation of various parts of the body of deceased people, all the practical experience they have gained, are still actively used in modern anatomy and medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • View PDF of Presentation Slides
    Body of Knowledge: The Benefits and Challenges of a Multi-Faceted Curatorial Collaborative Dominic Hall, Curator, Warren Anatomical Museum, Center for the History of Medicine, Francis A. Countway Library of Medicine, Harvard University Cara Kiernan Fallon, MPH, Graduate Student, Department of the History of Science, Harvard University Lisa Haushofer, MD, Graduate Student, Department of the History of Science, Harvard University Katharine Park, Samuel David S. Jones, A. Lisa Haushofer, Zemurray, Jr. and Doris Bernard Ackerman Graduate Student, Zemurray Stone Radcliffe Professor of Professor of the Wheatland the History of Science Culture of Medicine Curatorial Fellow Orange: Department of the History of Science, Harvard University Purple: Department of the History of Science, Harvard University; Cara Kiernan Fallon, Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School Paola Savoia, Graduate Student, Graduate Student, Wheatland Blue: Center for the History of Medicine, Francis A. Countway Wheatland Curatorial Curatorial Fellow Library of Medicine, Harvard Medicine School Fellow *Dr. Podolsky is also Associate Professor of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School Scott Podolsky, Dominic Hall, Jack Eckert, Public Director* Services Librarian Curator, Warren Anatomical Museum Curators Lisa Haushofer, Graduate Student, Samantha van Wheatland Gerbig, Designer & Curatorial Fellow Photographer Cara Kiernan Fallon, Cira Louise Brown, Orange: Department of the History of Science, Harvard University Graduate Student, Wheatland Curatorial Fellow Wheatland Green: Collection of Historical Scientific Instruments, Department Curatorial Fellow of the History of Science, Harvard University Paola Savoia, Sara J. Schechner, Graduate Student, David P. Wheatland Wheatland Curatorial Curator Fellow Designers Center for the Collection of History of Medicine, Historical Scientific Harvard Medical Francis A.
    [Show full text]
  • 12.2% 116,000 120M Top 1% 154 3,900
    We are IntechOpen, the world’s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists 3,900 116,000 120M Open access books available International authors and editors Downloads Our authors are among the 154 TOP 1% 12.2% Countries delivered to most cited scientists Contributors from top 500 universities Selection of our books indexed in the Book Citation Index in Web of Science™ Core Collection (BKCI) Interested in publishing with us? Contact [email protected] Numbers displayed above are based on latest data collected. For more information visit www.intechopen.com Chapter Introductory Chapter: Veterinary Anatomy and Physiology Valentina Kubale, Emma Cousins, Clara Bailey, Samir A.A. El-Gendy and Catrin Sian Rutland 1. History of veterinary anatomy and physiology The anatomy of animals has long fascinated people, with mural paintings depicting the superficial anatomy of animals dating back to the Palaeolithic era [1]. However, evidence suggests that the earliest appearance of scientific anatomical study may have been in ancient Babylonia, although the tablets upon which this was recorded have perished and the remains indicate that Babylonian knowledge was in fact relatively limited [2]. As such, with early exploration of anatomy documented in the writing of various papyri, ancient Egyptian civilisation is believed to be the origin of the anatomist [3]. With content dating back to 3000 BCE, the Edwin Smith papyrus demonstrates a recognition of cerebrospinal fluid, meninges and surface anatomy of the brain, whilst the Ebers papyrus describes systemic function of the body including the heart and vas- culature, gynaecology and tumours [4]. The Ebers papyrus dates back to around 1500 bCe; however, it is also thought to be based upon earlier texts.
    [Show full text]
  • The Teaching of Anatomy Throughout the Centuries: from Herophilus To
    Medicina Historica 2019; Vol. 3, N. 2: 69-77 © Mattioli 1885 Original article: history of medicine The teaching of anatomy throughout the centuries: from Herophilus to plastination and beyond Veronica Papa1, 2, Elena Varotto2, 3, Mauro Vaccarezza4, Roberta Ballestriero5, 6, Domenico Tafuri1, Francesco M. Galassi2, 7 1 Department of Motor Sciences and Wellness, University of Naples “Parthenope”, Napoli, Italy; 2 FAPAB Research Center, Avola (SR), Italy; 3 Department of Humanities (DISUM), University of Catania, Catania, Italy; 4 School of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Curtin University, Bentley, Perth, WA, Australia; 5 University of the Arts, Central Saint Martins, London, UK; 6 The Gordon Museum of Pathology, Kings College London, London, UK;7 Archaeology, College of Hu- manities, Arts and Social Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia Abstract. Cultural changes, scientific progress, and new trends in medical education have modified the role of dissection in the teaching of anatomy in today’s medical schools. Dissection is indispensable for a correct and complete knowledge of human anatomy, which can ensure safe as well as efficient clinical practice and the hu- man dissection lab could possibly be the ideal place to cultivate humanistic qualities among future physicians. In this manuscript, we discuss the role of dissection itself, the value of which has been under debate for the last 30 years; furthermore, we attempt to focus on the way in which anatomy knowledge was delivered throughout the centuries, from the ancient times, through the Middles Ages to the present. Finally, we document the rise of plastination as a new trend in anatomy education both in medical and non-medical practice.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Anatomy at Cornell
    A History of Anatomy at Cornell Howard E. Evans Prof. of Veterinary and Comparative Anatomy, Emeritus College of Veterinary Medicine Cornell University Ithaca, N.Y. Published by The Internet-First University Press ©2013 Cornell University Commentary on the History of Anatomy at Cornell1 Historical Notes as Regards the Department of Anatomy H. E. Evans The Early Days To set the stage for this review, Cornell University opened on Oct. 7, 1868 in South University building, the only building on campus (later re-named Morrill Hall). North University building (White Hall) was under construc- tion but McGraw Hall in between, which would house anatomy, zoology and the museum, had not begun. Louis Agassiz of Harvard, who was appointed non-resident Prof. of Natural History at Cornell, gave an enthusias- tic inaugural address and set the tone for future courses in natural science. Included on the first faculty were Burt G. Wilder, M.D. from Harvard as Prof. of Comparative Anatomy and Natural History, recommended to President A.D. White by Agassiz, and James Law, FRCVS as Prof. of Veterinary Surgery, who was recommended by John Gamgee of the New Edinburgh Veterinary College and hired after an interview in London by Pres. White. Both Wilder and Law were accomplished anatomists in addition to their other abilities and both helped shape Cornell for many years. I found in the records many instances of their interactions on campus, which is not surprising when one considers how few buildings there were. The Anatomy Department in the College of Veterinary Medicine has a legacy of anatomical teaching at Cornell that began before our College became a separate entity in 1896.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Anatomy
    science from its beginning and in all its branches so related as to weave the story into a continu- ous narrative has been sadly lacking. Singer states that in order to lessen the bulk of his work he has omitted references and bibliog- raphies from its pages, but we may readily recognize in reading it that he has gone to original sources for its contents and that all the statements it contains are authoritative and can readily be verified. In the Preface Singer indicates that we may hope to see the work continued to a later date than Harvey’s time and also that the present work may yet be expanded so as to contain material necessarily excluded from a book of the size into which this is compressed, because from cover to cover this volume is all meat and splendidly served for our delectation and digestion. Singer divides the history of Anatomy into four great epochs or stages. The first is from the Greek period to 50 b .c ., comprising the Hippocratic period, Aristotle and the Alexan- drians. Although, as Singer says, “our anatom- ical tradition, like that of every other depart- ment of rational investigation, goes back to the Greeks,” yet before their time men groped at some ideas as to anatomical structure, as evinced by the drawings found in the homes of the cave dwellers, and the Egyptians and the The Evo lut ion of Ana to my , a Short Histo ry of Anat omi cal an d Phys iolo gica l Disc ove ry , Mesopotamians had quite distinct conceptions to Harve y .
    [Show full text]
  • A Course in the History of Biology: II
    A Course in the History of Biology: II By RICHARDP. AULIE Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/32/5/271/26915/4443048.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021 * Second part of a two-part article. An explanation of the provements in medical curricula, and the advent of author's history of biology course for high school teachers, human dissections; (ii) the European tradition in together with abstracts of two of the course topics-"The Greek View of Biology" and "What Biology Owes the Arabs" anatomy, which was influenced by Greek and Arab -was presented in last month's issue. sources and produced an indigenous anatomic liter- ature before Vesalius; and (iii) Vesalius' critical The Renaissance Revolution in Anatomy examination of Galen, with his introduction of peda- urely a landmark in gogic innovations in the Fabrica. This landmark thus shows the coalescing of these several trends, all - 1- q -thei history of biology is De Humani Corpo- expressed by the Renaissance artistic temperament, and all rendered possible by the new printing press, - 1 P risi tFabrica Libri Sep- engraving, and improvements in textual analysis. - - ~~~tern("Seven Books on the Workings of By contrast with Arab medicine, which flourished the Human Body"), in an extensive hospital system, Renaissance anatomy published in 1543 by was associated from the start with European univer- sities, which were peculiarly a product of the 12th- Vesalius of -- ~~~~~Andreas E U I Brussels (1514-1564). century West. As a preface to Vesalius, the lectures In our course in the on this topic gave attention to the founding of the universities of Bologna (1158), Oxford (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Mammals on the Move
    BOOKS & ARTS NATURE|Vol 446|15 March 2007 like it. The same can be said for biomolecular studies the many ways in which organisms orders are unknown, so it would be impossible systems: we may never be able to comprehend can actively restructure their genetic material, to restrict the contents of chapters to strictly every molecular interaction within a cell, but if believes that such processes should be more monophyletic units. Nowadays, taxonomists we can build a system that behaves just like its widely incorporated into evolutionary think- have to deal with two different taxonomies: a natural counterpart, then perhaps we should ing. Although Darwin could not possibly have traditional one, based on morphology, and a be satisfied with that. anticipated such processes, they follow the modern one, based on molecular analysis. Each Amos’s account of the different paths to general darwinian paradigm and do not, in my chapter begins with an introduction describing synthetic biology covers most of the recent opinion, necessitate a ‘third way’ somewhere our changing views on the relationships of the advances that have made the headlines. These between creationism and what Shapiro calls animals to be discussed. These introductions range from pieces of DNA called ‘biobricks’ ‘neo-darwinian orthodoxy’. show the perspective and knowledge that Rose and the ‘repressilator’ to a way of coaxing yeast But apart from this quibble, this is an enjoy- uses when examining the data. When avail- to produce the precursor for a malaria drug able book that could perhaps have profited able, he provides two alternative cladograms — a feat for which Jay Keasling, a biochemical from more illustrations to convey some of the showing the relationships among the studied engineer at the University of California, Berke- computational and experimental methods.
    [Show full text]
  • The Anatomy of Anatomia: Dissection and the Organization of Knowledge in British Literature, 1500-1800
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2009 The na atomy of anatomia: dissection and the organization of knowledge in british literature, 1500-1800 Matthew cottS Landers Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the English Language and Literature Commons Recommended Citation Landers, Matthew Scott, "The na atomy of anatomia: dissection and the organization of knowledge in british literature, 1500-1800" (2009). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1390. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1390 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. THE ANATOMY OF ANATOMIA: DISSECTION AND THE ORGANIZATION OF KNOWLEDGE IN BRITISH LITERATURE, 1500-1800 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fi lfi llment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of English by Matthew Scott Landers B.A., University of Dallas, 2002 May 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Because of the sheer scale of my project, it would have been impossible to fi nish this dissertation without the opportunity to do research at libraries with special collections in the history of science. I am extremely greatful, as a result, to the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation at the University of Oklahoma for awarding me a fellowship to the History of Science Collections at Bizzell Library; and to Marilyn Ogilvie and Kerry Magruder for their kind assistance while there.
    [Show full text]
  • North American Geology, Paleontology, Petrology, and Mineralogy
    Bulletin No. 271 Series G, Miscellaneous, 29 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DiKECTOR BIBLIOGRAPHY AND INDEX OF NORTH AMERICAN GEOLOGY, PALEONTOLOGY, PETROLOGY, AND MINERALOGY FOR THE YE.AR 19O4 BY FIRED BOTJGKHITOIISr WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1905 CONTENTS, Page Letter of transmittal...................................................... 5 Introduction..................'........................................... 7 List of publications examined ............................................. 9 Bibliography..................................... ........................ 15 Classified key to the index................................................ 135 Index................................................................... 143 LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, Washington, J). <7., June 7, 1905. SIR: I transmit here with the manuscript of a bibliography and index of North American geology, paleontology, petrology, and mineralogy for the year 1904, and request that it be published as a bulletin of the Survey. Very respectfully, F. B. WEEKS. Hon. CHARLES D. WALCOTT, Director United States Geological Survey. 5 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND INDEX OF NORTH AMERICAN GEOLOGY, PALEONTOLOGY, PETROLOGY, AND MINERALOGY FOR THE YEAR 1904. By FRED BOUGIITON WEEKS. INTRODUCTION. The arrangement of the material of the Bibliography and Index for 1903 is similar to that adopted for the preceding annual bibliographies. Bulletins Nos. 130, 135, 146,149, 156, 162, 172
    [Show full text]
  • The Thorax in History 2. Hellenistic Experiment and Human Dissection
    Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.33.2.153 on 1 April 1978. Downloaded from Thorax, 1978, 33, 153-166 The thorax in history 2. Hellenistic experiment and human dissection R.K. FRENCH From the Wellcome Unit for the History of Medicine, University of Cambridge The first anatomical revolution occurred in Alex- the dead body was essential to the ancient practice andria in the third century before Christ. To that of embalming, an Egyptian technique well known period we can trace the continuous historical line to the Greeks. The Greek philosophers, Plato and of our own ideas on the structure and function of Aristotle, emphasised the distinction between soul the body, important among which are those on the and body:' it was the immaterial soul that sur- thorax. For the first time, the human body was vived the death of the corporeal body, and the systematically explored in an attempt to under- soul, sharing no characteristics with the body, stand its structure, and, with some notable errors could not be affected by the postmortem mutila- from animal anatomy, the only source for 'human' tion of the body; there was no quasi-material after- anatomy in the preceding period, these anatomical life in human form, as so many cultures believed. ideas are recognisably similar to those of to-day. In a word, the old religious taboos no longer The physiological ideas of the Alexandrians, on applied. the other hand, are strikingly different from ours, Of fundamental importance in the development and their subsequent transformation will be exam- of human dissection in Alexandria was the exist- http://thorax.bmj.com/ ined in later articles.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomical Study in the Western World Before The
    Acta Biomed 2019; Vol. 90, N. 4: 523-525 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v90i4.8738 © Mattioli 1885 Medical humanities Anatomical study in the Western world before the Middle Ages: historical evidence Andrea Alberto Conti, Ferdinando Paternostro Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica, Università degli Studi di Firenze, Florence, Italy Summary. Although modern anatomy is commonly retained to begin in the XVI century, the roots of ana- tomical study in the Western world may be identified beforehand. An anatomical practice was present in the Western world well before the Middle Ages, starting in ancient Greece. Hippocrates of Cos (V-IV centuries B.C.) provided descriptions of the heart and vessels, and the so-called “Hippocratic Corpus” largely deals with anatomy. Aristotle of Stagira (IV century B.C.) was one of the first well-known scholars of the past to perform dissections of animals. The anatomical interest of Aristotle contained a “physiological” background too, since he was convinced that all parts of human organisms had one or more specific functions. Galen of Pergamum (II century A.D.) was the performer of hundreds of dissections of animals, and he described a great number of anatomical parts of apes, dogs, goats and pigs. The anatomical system of Galen became a gold standard for medicine for more than a thousand years, and in the Middle Ages (V-XV centuries A.D.) the human anatomy that was taught and acquired in European universities remained based on Galenic anatomy. In conclusion, Greek-speaking scholars between the IV century B.C. and the II century A.D. set the basis for the systematic dissection of animals and the comparative investigation of animal anatomical findings.
    [Show full text]