Somalia SIGI 2019 Category N/A SIGI Value 2019 N/A
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Utah Legislative Platform
Utah Legislative Platform Category: Business Process Innovations Contact: David Fletcher State of Utah Project Initiation and Completion Dates: March 2017 – December 2018 Online/le.utah.gov December 2017 Online/Senate.utah.gov December 2018 Online/Capitol Tour December 2017 Apple Watch/Bill Watch March 2017 Alexa Skill - Utah Ballot Information - October 2018 NASCIO 2019 Executive Summary The Utah State Legislature suite of websites, social media, mobile applications, notification systems and APIs help Utahns, political subdivisions, and interested parties connect and interact with legislators and the government process. Government officials can learn about proposed and historic legislation, identify their legislator, sign up for alerts and notifications, learn what their legislators are thinking, as well as listen to recordings of committee and floor debates using the platform of interrelated services. This suite services also allow government bodies to more effectively participate in the legislative process. Delivering services and information is the core of what government does. The challenge for government is to meet and exceed expectations by delivering services and information across a variety of channels. This suite of services provides targeted notifications, information updates, and email alerts simultaneously to the public and all government officials; providing instantaneous access to information at the same time that the Legislature is receiving it. These service include: ● Le.utah.gov ● Bill Watch ● Voice Assistants ● Social Media ● Financial Disclosures The core of the legislative process is that legislators are acting on feedback received from constituents including the political subdivisions such as cities,counties and school districts. Every bill that they run started with feedback from individuals or groups wanting to make the state better. -
Constitution of the Puntland State of Somalia
CONSTITUTION OF THE PUNTLAND STATE OF SOMALIA December 2009 English Translation November 2011 .• Puntland State was created in 1998 through a consultative agreement among the different regions that constitute Puntland. The creation of Puntland State emerged from Somalia's failure to re-establish an inclusive national government for eight years. The people of Puntland realized they could not continue without a government. It was then decided in the constitutional conference of 1998 that Punt land would become a state that would be part of a federal Somalia. A charter was approved in that same 1998 conference and later replaced with a provisional constitution that was approved by members of the House of Representatives in 200 l. A referendum on the constitution was to have taken place in 2004, although this was not accomplished. Since it was not possible to hold a referendum on the constitution it was decided that the constitution would continue in force while undergoing review. The constitutional review process began in May 2007 and continued until June 2009. In the review process, meaningful opinions were contributed from different sectors of Puntland society, such as Somali lawyers and foreign lawyers. Therefore, the new constitution was drafted to become the law of the people of Puntland and was based on the Islamic shari'a and, at the same time, the constitution guides the system of governance, and thus brings collaboration and order among the different government institutions of the state. It is important to mention that this constitution will have an impact on the life of every Puntlander, because no nation may exist without laws, and therefore this constitution brings order among citizens and moreover entrenches their human rights and responsibilities so that they may attain social and economic development. -
The History of the Term Limit Debate in Congress
When a Popular Idea Meets Congress: The History of the Term Limit Debate in Congress John David Rausch, jr, West Texas A&M University abstract: This paper examines the history of the term limit debate in the United States from the days of the Articles of Confedera- tion through the 1990s. The research finds that the realities of the legislative process provide infertile ground for enacting congressional term limits. Advocates of term limits serving in Congress have not had the resources to overcome the obstacles presented by the legisla- tive process. The findings contradict the conventional wisdom that Congress responds quickly to popular ideas that sweep the nation. The legislative term limit movement emerged as a signifi- 1784, pp. 98–99). The Committee found Samuel Osgood cant political phenomenon in the early 1990s. Term limi- of Massachusetts ineligible for service since he had served tation, however, was far from a new idea (see Petracca, three years after the ratification of the Articles. Osgood 1992). In fact, the idea of placing limits on the amount of withdrew from the House (Burnett, 1964). Other del- time an elected official spends in office has been debated egates were investigated, primarily for serving beyond the since before the framing of the Constitution of the United one year for which they had been elected. Some contro- States. The novelty of the Oklahoma term limit effort in versy ensued over the exact date of election for the del- 1990 was that it was successful and that it involved the egates from Rhode Island, and they refused to vacate their mass electorate using the citizen initiative process. -
Ministry of Education & Higher Education Republic of Somaliland
Ministry of Education & Higher Education Republic of Somaliland Global Partnership for Education Programme Document 2013-2016 Final FOREWORD We aim to strengthen our Education Sector and provide every child in Somaliland quality education, with well-prepared teachers using an effective curriculum. Our vision for the development of the education system is in Somaliland is grounded in the following premise: Every child in Somaliland living in every region has the right to a quality education. Providing quality education that caters to students’ needs should be a primary objective, from early childhood education through to further and higher education. The importance of quality teaching for quality education cannot be underestimated. To achieve this, teachers at all levels of education must be trained appropriately. Teachers should continue their professional development through a period of induction into the profession with the support of supervisors and mentors and should have access throughout their careers to high quality continuous professional development and learning. The teaching and learning environment should be designed in such a way that it supports teachers and all education officials in their missions to educate our children. Quality education nurtures human talent and creativity and will contribute to the personal and professional development of the individual person, as well as to the social, cultural, moral, economic, political and environmental development of society at large. We know that quality education promotes peace, solidarity, inclusion, a commitment to a sustainable environment, and international and intercultural understanding. The Ministry of Education & Higher Education appreciates the assistance of the Global Partnership for Education for improving the quality of education in Somaliland through support to teachers. -
Access to Justice in Environmental Matters: Overview of the Convention Implementation
AC/TF.AJ-8/Inf.3 Task Force on Access to Justice Eighth meeting Geneva, 15-17 June 2015 Item 3 of the provisional agenda Substantive issue ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS: OVERVIEW OF THE CONVENTION IMPLEMENTATION Background paper1 This background paper was prepared on the basis of the synthesis report submitted to the fifth session of the Meeting of the Parties to the Aarhus Convention (30 June – 1 July 2015, Maastricht, the Netherlands), relevant findings and reports of the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee (hereinafter – the Committee) from the previous intersessional period up to now (2011-2015)2. The document outlines systemic issues with regard to access to justice relevant to the work of the Task Force. Delegates are invited to consult this document in advance of the meeting in order to gain an overview of the status the implementation of article 9 of the Aarhus Convention and to discuss further needs to be addressed under auspices of the Task Force. 1 The document was not formally edited. 2 Available from http://www.unece.org/env/pp/cc.html AC/TF.AJ-8/Inf.3 Contents Page I. Information from the Synthesis Report presented to the Meeting of the Parties at its fifth session .......... 3 1. Article 9 - General provisions ............................................................................................................... 3 2. Ensuring access to a review procedure (article 9, paragraph 1) ............................................................ 3 3. Challenging decisions, acts or omissions not complying with article 6 provisions (article 9, paragraph 2) 4 4. Challenging acts and omissions by private persons and public authorities that contravene environmental legislation (article 9, paragraph 3) ........................................................................................ -
Somaliland: the Strains of Success
Somaliland: The Strains of Success Crisis Group Africa Briefing N°113 Nairobi/Brussels, 5 October 2015 I. Overview Somaliland’s hybrid system of tri-party democracy and traditional clan-based gov- ernance has enabled the consolidation of state-like authority, social and economic recovery and, above all, relative peace and security but now needs reform. Success has brought greater resources, including a special funding status with donors – especially the UK, Denmark and the European Union (EU) – as well as investment from and diplomatic ties with Turkey and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), though not inter- national recognition. It is increasingly part of the regional system; ties are especially strong with Ethiopia and Djibouti. Given the continued fragility of the Somalia Federal Government (SFG), which still rejects its former northern region’s independence claims, and civil war across the Gulf of Aden in Yemen, Somaliland’s continued stabil- ity is vital. This in turn requires political reforms aimed at greater inclusion, respect for mediating institutions (especially the professional judiciary and parliament) and a regional and wider internationally backed framework for external cooperation and engagement. Successful state building has, nevertheless, raised the stakes of holding – and los- ing – power. While Somaliland has remained largely committed to democratic gov- ernment, elections are increasingly fraught. Fear of a return to bitter internal conflict is pushing more conservative politics: repression of the media and opposition, as well as resistance to reforming the increasingly unsustainable status quo. Recurrent po- litical crises and delayed elections (now set for March 2017) risk postponing much needed internal debate. The political elites have a limited window to decide on steps necessary to rebuild the decaying consensus, reduce social tensions and set an agenda for political and institutional reform. -
UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund for Somalia QUARTERLY REPORT
UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund for Somalia QUARTERLY REPORT 1 January – 31 March 2016 1 UN MPTF QUARTERLY REPORT: 1 January – 31 March 2016 Dear Colleagues, dear Partners, Welcome to the second quarterly report of the UN Multi-Partner Trust Fund (UN MPTF). Following 2015, which focused on getting the joint programmes designed and launched, the first quarter of 2016 was dedicated almost entirely on implementation and on the expansion or extension of current efforts. All of this is happening under the strong guidance and oversight of the SDRF structures, which are now robust platforms for genuine policy engagement between national and regional actors and between Somali representatives and the international community. As Somalia approaches a number of key milestones, a number of Joint Programmes in fact experienced acceleration in their activities, which are highlighted in this report. At the same time, new initiatives were started during the reporting period. I am particularly pleased to report on the launch of the UN MPTF National Window, which allows fund transfers directly to national entities. In this regard, a pilot project of $2 million investment from the Peacebuilding Fund for the rehabilitation of small-scale infrastructure is now underway. The project channels funds directly to the Central Bank of Somalia, on budget and on treasury, using the national financial systems under the oversight of the Ministry of Finance. In the design of the National Window and this project, the UN has collaborated very closely with the World Bank. As a result, a number of procedures have been harmonized, and capacity strengthening efforts are coordinated. -
ICT for Development and Empowering Success”
1st Conference and Exhibition on Somaliland ICT Somaliland ICT Conference 2019 Theme of the year “ICT for Development and Empowering Success” Participant of the conference on Somaliland ICT 2019 Prepared by: Abdirahman Mohamed Sh. Abdilahi Mohamed Ibrahim Saleban Institute for Personal and Organizational Development (IPOD)\ Hargeisa, Somaliland September 13, 2019 CONFERENCE SPONSORS Table of Contents Acronym ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................. 5 Background and Rationale of the Conference .......................................................................................... 5 Objectives of the Conference ...................................................................................................................... 6 Participants of the Conference ................................................................................................................... 6 Welcoming and Opening Statements ......................................................................................................... 6 Panel Discussions ....................................................................................................................................... 13 Presentations ............................................................................................................................................. -
Preempting the Public Interest
PREEMPTING THE PUBLIC INTEREST How TTIP Will Limit US States’ Public Health and Environmental Protections i THE CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL LAW © 2015 Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) About CIEL Founded in 1989, the Center for International Environmental Law (CIEL) uses the power of law to protect the environment, promote human rights, and ensure a just and sustainable society. CIEL is dedicated to advocacy in the global public interest through legal counsel, policy research, analysis, education, training, and capacity building. “Preempting the Public Interest: How TTIP Will Limit US States’ Public Health and Environmental Protections” by the Center for International Environmental Law is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Acknowledgements This report was prepared by Sharon Anglin Treat, former legislator for the state of Maine, in collaboration with Baskut Tuncak, senior attorney at CIEL. Many thanks to David Azoulay and Carroll Muffett for helpful insights and perspectives. A special thanks to Amanda Kistler and CIEL intern Melissa E. Shapiro for their assistance and contributions. PREEMPTING THE PUBLIC INTEREST ii Contents 1 Executive Summary 2 Key Messages and Recommendations 3 I. Introduction 4 II. US State Regulation of Chemicals and Pesticides State policy on chemicals and consumer products State pesticides policy 9 III. Details of the EU’s TTIP Regulatory Cooderation Proposal US states and EU member nations (“non-central governments”) would be covered by most of the provisions of the EU’s proposed Chapter on Regulatory Cooperation Federal government oversight of US state compliance with regulatory cooperation Scope of legislation and regulations covered Enforcing the regulatory cooperation obligations 13 IV. -
Improving Financial Security in the Context of the Environmental Liability Directive
Improving financial security in the context of the Environmental Liability Directive No 07.0203/2018/789239/SER/ENV.E.4 May 2020 Study Prepared by: Valerie Fogleman, Stevens & Bolton LLP, Cardiff University School of Law and Politics Contributions to Section 11.6 Kristel De Smedt, Maastricht University, Faculty of Law Stephen Stec, Central European University, Department of Environmental Sciences and Policy Disclaimer: The information and views set out in this assessment are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Environment Directorate E – Implementation and Support to member States Unit 4 – Compliance and Better Regulation Contact: Hans Lopatta E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels Improving financial security in the context of the Environmental Liability Directive TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 ABSTRACT .......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................... -
Measuring Legislative Accomplishment, 1877–1994
Measuring Legislative Accomplishment, 1877–1994 Joshua D. Clinton Princeton University John S. Lapinski Yale University Understanding the dynamics of lawmaking in the United States is at the center of the study of American politics. A fundamental obstacle to progress in this pursuit is the lack of measures of policy output, especially for the period prior to 1946. The lack of direct legislative accomplishment measures makes it difficult to assess the performance of our political system. We provide a new measure of legislative significance and accomplishment. Specifically, we demonstrate how item- response theory can be combined with a new dataset that contains every public statute enacted between 1877 and 1994 to estimate “legislative importance” across time. Although the resulting estimates and associated standard errors provide new opportunities for scholars interested in analyzing U.S. policymaking since 1877, the methodology we present is not restricted to Congress, the United States, or lawmaking. here is a growing literature in political science fraction of enacted public statutes. In addressing the need that seeks to understand the nature of lawmak- to measure legislative accomplishment, our aim is to con- Ting. This work has focused primarily on the causes struct a measure that spans a very long time period and and consequences of legislative “gridlock” (see, for exam- comprehensively assesses the legislative output produced ple, Binder 1999; Coleman 1999; Cox and McCubbins by Congress. 2004; Krehbiel 1998; Mayhew 1991; McCarty, Poole, In assessing legislative accomplishment, we are mind- and Rosenthal 2005). Although this research has in- fulofthe contributions of past work to our knowledge creased our understanding of lawmaking, restricted data about lawmaking, and we draw on that work exten- combined with limited advancement in conceptualizing sively. -
Comprehensive Review of Legislation (Transition Phase Report)
World Bank Governance Logo June12, 2018 IRAQ - KURDISTAN REGIONAL GOVERNMENT (KRG) Public Disclosure Authorized COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF LEGISLATION (TRANSITION PHASE REPORT) Drafted by the World Bank Governance Global Practice technical team (GGOMN) with the Public Disclosure Authorized support of Ch.-H. Montin, Independent Consultant and Dara Mansur Law Firm Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ 3 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 5 1. Building on the Outputs of the June 2017 Scoping Report ................................................................................... 5 2. Verifying and Substantiating the Shura Council's Analysis .................................................................................. 5 3. Objectives and Resources of the Transition Phase ................................................................................................ 6 PART 1: DEFINING A TYPOLOGY OF LEGAL INSTRUMENTS ........................................... 8 Introduction ..............................................................................................................................................................