DOCSLIB.ORG

Open Thesis Draft 4.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Open Thesis Draft 4.Pdf The Pennsylvania State University The Graduate School Department of Art History PERFORMING NOBILITY. POVERTY, ART, AND LEGACY: MICHELANGELO’S QUEST FOR GLORIA A Thesis in Art History by Margaret Anne Neeley 2008 Margaret Anne Neeley Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts December 2008 The thesis of Margaret Anne Neeley was reviewed and approved* by the following: Brian Curran Associate Professor of Art History Graduate Officer, Department of Art History Thesis Advisor Charlotte M. Houghton Associate Professor of Art History Craig Zabel Associate Professor of Art History Head of the Department of Art History *Signatures are on file in the Graduate School iii ABSTRACT Although Michelangelo is probably the most written about artist in the field of art history, little has been said about the impact on his career of his origins in a noble family. The implication is that scholars believe that his nobility had little bearing on his artistic career. I shall argue the contrary: Michelangelo’s nobility had a profound impact on his career. Michelangelo came not simply from a noble family, but from one that had lost its wealth, and, therefore, its relevance among the Florentine patriciate. In this paper, I will discuss how this condition caused a crisis of identity in the Florentines who suffered from it, and resulted in a characteristic raison d’être specific to these individuals. In doing so, I will detail the ways in which Michelangelo was affected by this condition. From this exploration, I conclude that one of Michelangelo’s primary goals throughout his life was to restore his family’s prior status within Florence’s patriciate, and that Michelangelo saw his career and used it as a means to this end. In the process of building these arguments, I reconsider some major themes central to previous analysis of Michelangelo: his poverty and attitude toward money, and his biography (especially as seen through Condivi’s account), in addition to his artistic accomplishments. By considering Michelangelo in these terms, I propose a view of an artist deeply involved in a quest not only to fulfill an aesthetic vision, but, by securing a reputation for artistic brilliance, to restore his family and his own estate to its historical position within Florence’s upper echelons. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.....................................................................................................vi Introduction..............................................................................................................................1 Chapter 1 The Noble Origins of the Buonarroti Family and their Descent into the Poveri Vergognosi .......................................................................................................................16 Chapter 2 Poverty as Performance..........................................................................................25 Chapter 3 Biography as Performance .....................................................................................64 Chapter 4 Art as Gloria...........................................................................................................90 Conclusion ...............................................................................................................................106 Bibliography ............................................................................................................................109 Appendix..................................................................................................................................117 v LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3-1: Michelangelo Buonarroti, Battle of the Centaurs, 1492. Marble, 8.5 x 88cm. Casa Buonarroti, Florence. Reprinted from de Tolnay, “The Historic and Artistic Personality of Michelangelo,” in The Complete Works of Michelangelo, 1965, plate 4........................................................................................................................................117 Figure 3-2: Giulio Bonasone, Michelangelo Buonarroti, 1546. Copperplate print, 23.7 x 18.3cm. British Museum, London. Reprinted from Buonarroti, The Letters of Michelangelo, trans. Ramsden 1963, vol. 2, plate 7.. ......................................................118 Figure 4-1: Signature––a detail from Michelangelo’s Vatican Pietà. Reprinted from Baldini, “Sculpture,” chap. 2 in The Complete Work of Michelangelo, 1965, plate 19...119 Figure 4-2: Michelangelo Buonarroti, Vatican Pietà, 1497–1499. Marble, 174 x 195cm. Saint Peter’s Basilica, Vatican City. Reprinted from Baldini, “Sculpture,” chap. 2 in The Complete Works of Michelangelo, 1965, plate 18.. ..................................................120 vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS To Professors Brian Curran and Charlotte Houghton, I thank you for your support and guidance throughout this project. You both have taught me valuable lessons through which I have become a more able and careful scholar. To Michael St. Clair and the Babcock Galleries; the friends, family, and colleagues of Francis E. Hyslop; and Dean Gunalan Nadarajan; I thank you for awarding me with monies from, respectively, the Babcock Galleries Endowed Fund in Art History, the Francis E. Hyslop Memorial Graduate Fellowship, and the Penn State College of Arts and Architecture Graduate Student Travel Grant. Funds from these endowments allowed me to conduct research for this thesis in Florence. Thus, I was able to get a step closer to my subject and benefit from a cultural experience afforded to few people. To Nicola McCarthy, I thank you for editing this thesis. To my parents, William and Andrena Neeley—my best friends—words can never describe how much you mean to me; I thank you for always making me believe that I can accomplish anything, and that nothing is out of my reach. And to my grandmother, Margaret Neeley: although fate took you away before I was old enough to remember you, my parents tell me that I have developed your personality and interests. It is through our mutual love of art that I feel connected to you. And, it is through my work as an art historian that I hope to honor your memory and can only imagine to match your intellect and your sophistication; I dedicate this thesis to you. Introduction Michelangelo (1474–1564) is probably the most written about artist in the field of art history; thousands of publications have been dedicated to his personality and oeuvre. Except for William Wallace and Rab Hatfield who both began publishing on the topic during the first two years of the millennium, almost nothing has been written about his identity as a nobleman. Those academicians who have addressed his nobility have done so only in passing, typically in biographies about the artist for the purpose of introducing his origins, as John Addington Symonds did in The Life of Michelangelo Buonarroti (1928).1 Michelangelo descended from a noble family, but its position had been compromised, so it existed on the shamed margins of the nobility at the time of his birth. This background and the lack of more sustained research into the 1 John Addington Symonds, The Life of Michelangelo (New York, Modern Library, 1928), 1–3. Symonds devotes only two pages out of 544 to Michelangelo’s nobility. He uses this history to provide background information about Michelangelo family before he discusses Michelangelo’s birth and childhood. This history, in other words, serves no agenda in Symonds’s biography. He begins the biography: “The Buonarroti Simoni, to whom Michelangelo belonged, were a Florentine family of ancient burgher nobility. Their arms appear to have been originally ‘azure two bends or.’ To this coat was added ‘a label of four points gules inclosing three fleur-de lys or.’ That augmentation, adopted from the shields of Charles of Anjou, occurs upon the scutcheons of many Guelf houses and cities.” To this Symonds adds a few comments about the alliance Michelangelo made with the Count of Canossa to claim that they share part of their lineage, and a brief account of a couple of the positions Michelangelo’s ancestors held in the Florentine government. 2 impact this position had on his oeuvre suggests that art historians have found little reason to think that such facts are relevant to understanding his artistic achievements. Instead, his background as a member of a family that had experienced a humiliating drop in social status is taken as an unremarkable fact of his origin. It is subsequently ignored as having had little bearing on his sense of artistic purpose and artistic production. The following comment by Charles de Tolnay represents this prevailing outlook: It is significant, however, that young Michelangelo did not feel bound to class prejudices, as is shown by the fact that he chose his art as his vocation against the wishes of his father and uncle, who regarded it as unworthy of the prestige of their house. Michelangelo on the other hand seems to have been proud of it, so that for a long time he signed his letters ‘Michelangelo scultore.’ He did not care for social conventions, since he liked to be with artisans, stonecutters, and lowly artists; that is, lower-class people.2 Tolnay acknowledges Michelangelo’s patrician origins and recognizes that his artistic career deviated from an acceptable career choice for a Florentine patrician, but he assumes that Michelangelo chose this path, in part, because
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Doubles and Doubling in Tarchetti, Capuana, and De Marchi By
    Uncanny Resemblances: Doubles and Doubling in Tarchetti, Capuana, and De Marchi by Christina A. Petraglia A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Italian) At the University of Wisconsin-Madison 2012 Date of oral examination: December 12, 2012 Oral examination committee: Professor Stefania Buccini, Italian Professor Ernesto Livorni (advisor), Italian Professor Grazia Menechella, Italian Professor Mario Ortiz-Robles, English Professor Patrick Rumble, Italian i Table of Contents Introduction – The (Super)natural Double in the Fantastic Fin de Siècle…………………….1 Chapter 1 – Fantastic Phantoms and Gothic Guys: Super-natural Doubles in Iginio Ugo Tarchetti’s Racconti fantastici e Fosca………………………………………………………35 Chapter 2 – Oneiric Others and Pathological (Dis)pleasures: Luigi Capuana’s Clinical Doubles in “Un caso di sonnambulismo,” “Il sogno di un musicista,” and Profumo……………………………………………………………………………………..117 Chapter 3 – “There’s someone in my head and it’s not me:” The Double Inside-out in Emilio De Marchi’s Early Novels…………………..……………………………………………...222 Conclusion – Three’s a Fantastic Crowd……………………...……………………………322 1 The (Super)natural Double in the Fantastic Fin de Siècle: The disintegration of the subject is most often underlined as a predominant trope in Italian literature of the Twentieth Century; the so-called “crisi del Novecento” surfaces in anthologies and literary histories in reference to writers such as Pascoli, D’Annunzio, Pirandello, and Svevo.1 The divided or multifarious identity stretches across the Twentieth Century from Luigi Pirandello’s unforgettable Mattia Pascal / Adriano Meis, to Ignazio Silone’s Pietro Spina / Paolo Spada, to Italo Calvino’s il visconte dimezzato; however, its precursor may be found decades before in such diverse representations of subject fissure and fusion as embodied in Iginio Ugo Tarchetti’s Giorgio, Luigi Capuana’s detective Van-Spengel, and Emilio De Marchi’s Marcello Marcelli.
    [Show full text]
  • Stony Brook University
    SSStttooonnnyyy BBBrrrooooookkk UUUnnniiivvveeerrrsssiiitttyyy The official electronic file of this thesis or dissertation is maintained by the University Libraries on behalf of The Graduate School at Stony Brook University. ©©© AAAllllll RRRiiiggghhhtttsss RRReeessseeerrrvvveeeddd bbbyyy AAAuuuttthhhooorrr... The Civic Virtue of Women in Quattrocento Florence A Dissertation Presented by Christine Contrada to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History Stony Brook University May 2010 Copyright by Christine Contrada 2010 Stony Brook University The Graduate School Christine Contrada We, the dissertation committee for the above candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this dissertation. Dr. Alix Cooper – Dissertation Advisor Associate Professor, History Dr. Joel Rosenthal – Chairperson of Defense Distinguished Professor Emeritus, History Dr. Gary Marker Professor, History Dr. James Blakeley Assistant Professor, History St. Joseph’s College, New York This dissertation is accepted by the Graduate School. Lawrence Martin Dean of the Graduate School ii Abstract of the Dissertation The Civic Virtue of Women in Quattrocento Florence by Christine Contrada Doctor of Philosophy in History Stony Brook University 2010 Fifteenth century Florence has long been viewed as the epicenter of Renaissance civilization and a cradle of civic humanism. This dissertation seeks to challenge the argument that the cardinal virtues, as described by humanists like Leonardo Bruni and Matteo Palmieri, were models of behavior that only men adhered to. Elite men and women alike embraced the same civic ideals of prudence, justice, fortitude, and temperance. Although they were not feminists advocating for social changes, women like Alessandra Strozzi, Margherita Datini, and Lucrezia Tornabuoni had a great deal of opportunity to actively support their own interests and the interests of their kin within popular cultural models of civic virtue.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Emotions Is Elsa Morante, Goliarda Sapienza and Elena
    NARRATING INTENSITY: HISTORY AND EMOTIONS IN ELSA MORANTE, GOLIARDA SAPIENZA AND ELENA FERRANTE by STEFANIA PORCELLI A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Comparative Literature in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2020 © 2020 STEFANIA PORCELLI All Rights Reserved ii Narrating Intensity: History and Emotions in Elsa Morante, Goliarda Sapienza and Elena Ferrante by Stefania Porcell i This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Comparative Literature in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ________ ______________________________ Date [Giancarlo Lombardi] Chair of Examining Committee ________ ______________________________ Date [Giancarlo Lombardi] Executive Officer Supervisory Committee: Monica Calabritto Hermann Haller Nancy Miller THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK iii ABSTRACT Narrating Intensity: History and Emotions in Elsa Morante, Goliarda Sapienza and Elena Ferrante By Stefania Porcelli Advisor: Giancarlo Lombardi L’amica geniale (My Brilliant Friend) by Elena Ferrante (published in Italy in four volumes between 2011 and 2014 and translated into English between 2012 and 2015) has galvanized critics and readers worldwide to the extent that it is has been adapted for television by RAI and HBO. It has been deemed “ferocious,” “a death-defying linguistic tightrope act,” and a combination of “dark and spiky emotions” in reviews appearing in popular newspapers. Taking the considerable critical investment in the affective dimension of Ferrante’s work as a point of departure, my dissertation examines the representation of emotions in My Brilliant Friend and in two Italian novels written between the 1960s and the 1970s – La Storia (1974, History: A Novel) by Elsa Morante (1912-1985) and L’arte della gioia (The Art of Joy, 1998/2008) by Goliarda Sapienza (1924-1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Cellini Vs Michelangelo: a Comparison of the Use of Furia, Forza, Difficultà, Terriblità, and Fantasia
    International Journal of Art and Art History December 2018, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 22-30 ISSN: 2374-2321 (Print), 2374-233X (Online) Copyright © The Author(s).All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development DOI: 10.15640/ijaah.v6n2p4 URL: https://doi.org/10.15640/ijaah.v6n2p4 Cellini vs Michelangelo: A Comparison of the Use of Furia, Forza, Difficultà, Terriblità, and Fantasia Maureen Maggio1 Abstract: Although a contemporary of the great Michelangelo, Benvenuto Cellini is not as well known to the general public today. Cellini, a master sculptor and goldsmith in his own right, made no secret of his admiration for Michelangelo’s work, and wrote treatises on artistic principles. In fact, Cellini’s artistic treatises can be argued to have exemplified the principles that Vasari and his contemporaries have attributed to Michelangelo. This paper provides an overview of the key Renaissance artistic principles of furia, forza, difficultà, terriblità, and fantasia, and uses them to examine and compare Cellini’s famous Perseus and Medusa in the Loggia deiLanzi to the work of Michelangelo, particularly his famous statue of David, displayed in the Galleria dell’ Accademia. Using these principles, this analysis shows that Cellini not only knew of the artistic principles of Michelangelo, but that his work also displays a mastery of these principles equal to Michelangelo’s masterpieces. Keywords: Cellini, Michelangelo, Renaissance aesthetics, Renaissance Sculptors, Italian Renaissance 1.0Introduction Benvenuto Cellini was a Florentine master sculptor and goldsmith who was a contemporary of the great Michelangelo (Fenton, 2010). Cellini had been educated at the Accademiade lDisegno where Michelangelo’s artistic principles were being taught (Jack, 1976).
    [Show full text]
  • Michelangelo Biography
    Michelangelo Biography Michelangelo (1475 – 1564) Italian Renaissance sculptor, painter, poet and architect. One of the most influential Western artists of all time. “I saw the angel in the marble and carved until I set him free. “ – Michelangelo Short biography of Michelangelo Michelangelo Buonarroti was born on 6 March 1475, in a Florentine village called Caprese. His father was a serving magistrate of the Florentine Republic and came from an important family. However, Michelangelo did not wish to imitate his father’s career, and was attracted by the artistic world. At the time, this was considered an inferior occupation for a family of his standing. But, aged 13, Michelangelo was apprenticed to Domenico Ghirlandaio, the leading fresco wall painter in Florence. Here Michelangelo learned some of the basic painting techniques, and also taught himself new skills such as sculpting. Madonna of the stairs – Michelangelo’s earliest works His talents were soon noticed by one of the most powerful families in Florence – Lorezo de’ Medici. Here, at de Medici’s court, Michelangelo was able to learn from the classic Masters and he became determined to improve upon the great classics of Greek and Latin art. Michelangelo, was born in the heart of the Renaissance movement, at exactly the right place – Florence. But, despite being at the heart of the Renaissance, Florence was undergoing tremendous political turmoil. His first patrons, the de Medici’s, lost power and Michelangelo was forced to look elsewhere for commissions. In 1496, he travelled to Rome where he began a long relationship of doing commissions for the Popes who were making St Peter’s Basilica a pinnacle of Western art.
    [Show full text]
  • Ikonotheka 30, 2020
    IKONOTHEKA 30, 2020 Tomáš Murár insTiTuTe oF arT hisTory, czech academy oF sciences, czech republic orcid: 0000-0002-3418-1941 https://doi.org/10.31338/2657-6015ik.30.1 “A work of art is an object that necessitates contemplation”. Latency of visual studies within the Vienna School of Art History? Abstract This article investigates a research method of the so-called Vienna School of Art History, mainly its transformation by Max Dvořák around the First World War. The article suggests the possible influence of Georg Simmel’s philosophy on Dvořák in this time, evident mainly in Dvořák’s interpretation of Pieter Bruegel the Elder’s art, written by Dvořák in 1920 and published posthumously in 1921. This another view on the Vienna School of Art History is then researched in writings on Pieter Bruegel the Elder by Dvořák’s students Hans Sedlmayr and Charles de Tolnay when Tolnay extended Dvořák’s thinking and Sedlmayr challenged its premises – both Tolnay and Sedlmayr thus in the same time interpreted Bruegel’s art differently, even though they were both Dvořák’s students. The article then suggests a possible interpretative relationship of the Vienna School of Art History after its transformation by Max Dvořák with today’s approaches to art (history), mainly with the so-called visual studies. Keywords: Max Dvořák, Vienna School of Art History, Georg Simmel, Visual Studies, Charles de Tolnay, Hans Sedlmayr. Introduction In Max Dvořák’s text on the art of Pieter Bruegel the Elder, written in 1920 and published posthumously in 1921,1 a reference to Georg Simmel’s interpretation of 1 M.
    [Show full text]
  • Ascanio Condivi (1525-1574) Discepolo E Biografo Di Michelangelo Buonarroti
    DIPARTIMENTO DI STORIA DELL’ARTE E SPETTACOLO DOTTORATO DI RICERCA IN Strumenti e Metodi per la Storia dell’Arte Coordinatore: Chiar.ma Prof.ssa Silvia DANESI SQUARZINA Ascanio Condivi (1525-1574) discepolo e biografo di Michelangelo Buonarroti Tomo I TUTOR: DOTTORANDA: Chiar.ma Prof.ssa Dott.ssa Beniamina MAZZUCA Silvia DANESI SQUARZINA XXIV Ciclo (aa.aa. 2008-2011) A mio padre Un ringraziamento sentito rivolgo alla prof.ssa Silvia Danesi Squarzina, insostituibile guida nel lavoro di questi anni, segnati dai suoi preziosi insegnamenti. Un vivo grazie anche alla prof.ssa Costanza Barbieri per il sostegno, la disponibilità e la grande cortesia riservatemi. Con affetto e simpatia ringrazio Luca Calenne e Tiziana Checchi, che mi hanno aiutata nella trascrizione dei documenti, e tutti gli amici e colleghi, in particolare Laura, Francesca e Carlo. Alla mia famiglia, a Valentino e ai miei amici di sempre: grazie di tutto. Indice TOMO I Introduzione VIII 1. Ascanio Condivi (1525-1574) 1.1. Lo stato degli studi 1 1.2. Origini della famiglia Condivi 8 1.3. Nascita e formazione 9 1.4. Primo viaggio a Roma 10 1.5. Un caso di omonimia 12 1.6. Il soggiorno romano 14 1.7. Ritorno a Ripatransone: le nozze e il turbolento rapporto con Annibal Caro 17 1.8. L’elezione tra i membri dell’Accademia Fiorentina 22 1.9. Gli ultimi anni a Ripatransone e la morte 24 1.10. Le opere di Ascanio Condivi nei documenti dell’archivio storico di Ripatransone 27 1.11. La discendenza 31 1.12. I ritratti di Ascanio Condivi e dei suoi discendenti 33 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking Savoldo's Magdalenes
    Rethinking Savoldo’s Magdalenes: A “Muddle of the Maries”?1 Charlotte Nichols The luminously veiled women in Giovanni Gerolamo Savoldo’s four Magdalene paintings—one of which resides at the Getty Museum—have consistently been identified by scholars as Mary Magdalene near Christ’s tomb on Easter morning. Yet these physically and emotionally self- contained figures are atypical representations of her in the early Cinquecento, when she is most often seen either as an exuberant observer of the Resurrection in scenes of the Noli me tangere or as a worldly penitent in half-length. A reconsideration of the pictures in connection with myriad early Christian, Byzantine, and Italian accounts of the Passion and devotional imagery suggests that Savoldo responded in an inventive way to a millennium-old discussion about the roles of the Virgin Mary and Mary Magdalene as the first witnesses of the risen Christ. The design, color, and positioning of the veil, which dominates the painted surface of the respective Magdalenes, encode layers of meaning explicated by textual and visual comparison; taken together they allow an alternate Marian interpretation of the presumed Magdalene figure’s biblical identity. At the expense of iconic clarity, the painter whom Giorgio Vasari described as “capriccioso e sofistico” appears to have created a multivalent image precisely in order to communicate the conflicting accounts in sacred and hagiographic texts, as well as the intellectual appeal of deliberately ambiguous, at times aporetic subject matter to northern Italian patrons in the sixteenth century.2 The Magdalenes: description, provenance, and subject The format of Savoldo’s Magdalenes is arresting, dominated by a silken waterfall of fabric that communicates both protective enclosure and luxuriant tactility (Figs.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Political Philosophy of Niccolò Machiavelli Filippo Del Lucchese Table of Contents Preface Part I
    The Political Philosophy of Niccolò Machiavelli Filippo Del Lucchese Table of Contents Preface Part I: The Red Dawn of Modernity 1: The Storm Part II: A Political Philosophy 2: The philosopher 3: The Discourses on Livy 4: The Prince 5: History as Politics 6: War as an art Part III: Legacy, Reception, and Influence 7: Authority, conflict, and the origin of the State (sixteenth-eighteenth centuries) 1 8: Nationalism and class conflict (nineteenth-twentieth centuries) Chronology Notes References Index 2 Preface Novel 84 of the Novellino, the most important collection of short stories before Boccaccio’s Decameron, narrates the encounter between the condottiere Ezzelino III da Romano and the Holy Roman Emperor Frederick II: It is recorded how one day being with the Emperor on horseback with all their followers, the two of them made a challenge which had the finer sword. The Emperor drew his sword from its sheath, and it was magnificently ornamented with gold and precious stones. Then said Messer Azzolino: it is very fine, but mine is finer by far. And he drew it forth. Then six hundred knights who were with him all drew forth theirs. When the Emperor saw the swords, he said that Azzolino’s was the finer.1 In the harsh conflict opposing the Guelphs and Ghibellines – a conflict of utter importance for the late medieval and early modern history of Italy and Europe – the feudal lord Ezzelino sends the Emperor a clear message: honours, reputation, nobility, beauty, ultimately rest on force. Gold is not important, good soldiers are, because good soldiers will find gold, not the contrary.
    [Show full text]
  • Non Ti Scordar Di Me
    ATTUALITÀ, CULTURA, SPETTACOLO, MUSICA, SPORT E APPUNTAMENTI www.temponews.it mercoledì 27 febbraio 2019 @Tempo_di_Carpi tempo.carpi anno XX - n. 07 • Edizione di Carpi • Marco Gianfranchi, Debora Di Nosse, Matteo Goghero e Stefania Tellini ALBERGO, PALESTRA E NEGOZI: UN NUOVO POLO COMMERCIALE IN VIA DELL’INDUSTRIA Eros Degli Innocenti IL GOVERNO NON PUÒ CONDANNARE LO SPETTACOLO VIAGGIANTE ALL’ESTINZIONE Giorgia Non ti scordar di me... Regnani E’ NATA A CARPI, GRAZIE A UN’IDEA DELL’AZIENDA STAR-T E IN COLLABORAZIONE CON ALCUNI STUDENTI DEL CORSO DI INFORMATICA DELL’ITIS LEONARDO BOOM DELLE MALATTIE VENEREE, DA VINCI, LA PRIMA APP CHE AIUTA I GENITORI A RIDURRE IL RISCHIO DI DIMENTICARE I PROPRI BAMBINI IN AUTO. A PARTIRE DALLA SIFILIDE Addio Paolo! Paolo non ce l’ha fatta. La malattia se l’è portato via domenica 24 febbraio. 57 anni, di Fossoli, aveva scoperto di essere malato nella scorsa primavera. E’ stato lui Le rubano la borsetta a ispirare la prima copertina di Tempo nel 2019 perché era dall’auto: “non mi sono arrabbiato per tutto ciò che gli capitava di accorta di niente” leggere sui social: si era rivolto alla Arriveranno presto le sono andata con mio padre era appena avvicinata, non hanno fatto niente però Redazione dicendo: telecamere nel parcheggio a fare una visita a un paren- l’avevano chiusa per non è stato un affronto: chi è “mi fa proprio dell’ospedale: quando le te ricoverato. Quando fare rumore. Mentre noi che si permette di venire a imbestialire chi getta 97 attuali diventeranno siamo usciti, intorno alle chiacchieravamo hanno prendere la mia borsa? Mi discredito sulla sanità, 169 nei comuni di Carpi, 14, ci siamo diretti all’auto aperto, preso e sono sento ancora così: ieri sono soprattutto quando Novi, Soliera e Campogal- chiacchierando.
    [Show full text]
  • Youth, Gender, and Education in Fascist Italy, 1922-1939 Jennifer L
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current Honors College Spring 2015 The model of masculinity: Youth, gender, and education in Fascist Italy, 1922-1939 Jennifer L. Nehrt James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/honors201019 Part of the European History Commons, History of Gender Commons, and the Social History Commons Recommended Citation Nehrt, Jennifer L., "The model of masculinity: Youth, gender, and education in Fascist Italy, 1922-1939" (2015). Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current. 66. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/honors201019/66 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Honors College at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects, 2010-current by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Model of Masculinity: Youth, Gender, and Education in Fascist Italy, 1922-1939 _______________________ An Honors Program Project Presented to the Faculty of the Undergraduate College of Arts and Letters James Madison University _______________________ by Jennifer Lynn Nehrt May 2015 Accepted by the faculty of the Department of History, James Madison University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors Program. FACULTY COMMITTEE: HONORS PROGRAM APPROVAL: Project Advisor: Jessica Davis, Ph.D. Philip Frana, Ph.D., Associate Professor, History Interim Director, Honors Program Reader: Emily Westkaemper, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, History Reader: Christian Davis, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, History PUBLIC PRESENTATION This work is accepted for presentation, in part or in full, at Honors Symposium on April 24, 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Following the Early Modern Engraver, 1480-1650 September 18, 2009-January 3, 2010
    The Brilliant Line: Following the Early Modern Engraver, 1480-1650 September 18, 2009-January 3, 2010 When the first engravings appeared in southern Germany around 1430, the incision of metal was still the domain of goldsmiths and other metalworkers who used burins and punches to incise armor, liturgical objects, and jewelry with designs. As paper became widely available in Europe, some of these craftsmen recorded their designs by printing them with ink onto paper. Thus the art of engraving was born. An engraver drives a burin, a metal tool with a lozenge-shaped tip, into a prepared copperplate, creating recessed grooves that will capture ink. After the plate is inked and its flat surfaces wiped clean, the copperplate is forced through a press against dampened paper. The ink, pulled from inside the lines, transfers onto the paper, printing the incised image in reverse. Engraving has a wholly linear visual language. Its lines are distinguished by their precision, clarity, and completeness, qualities which, when printed, result in vigorous and distinctly brilliant patterns of marks. Because lines once incised are very difficult to remove, engraving promotes both a systematic approach to the copperplate and the repetition of proven formulas for creating tone, volume, texture, and light. The history of the medium is therefore defined by the rapid development of a shared technical knowledge passed among artists dispersed across Renaissance and Baroque (Early Modern) Europe—from the Rhine region of Germany to Florence, Nuremberg, Venice, Rome, Antwerp, and Paris. While engravers relied on systems of line passed down through generations, their craft was not mechanical.
    [Show full text]