Macro Micro Timeline.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Macro Micro Timeline.Pdf 1942 1943 1944 1944 1946 Peggy Guggenheim Jackson Pollock Louis Ribak Douglas MacAgy The New Yorker critic opens her gallery has his first solo and Beatrice is appointed Robert Coates coins Art of This Century exhibition at Mandelman the director of the term “Abstract in New York. the Art of This move to Taos. the California Expressionism.” Century Gallery. School of Fine Arts and oversees The Los Alamos a progressive Dorothy Miller’s Laboratory (later faculty that Fourteen Americans the Los Alamos includes Clyfford opens at the National Laboratory) Still, Richard Museum of Modern is established in Diebenkorn, Art, NYC. The New Mexico. Edward Corbett, exhibition includes Clay Spohn, and Ben L. Culwell. Robert McChesney, as well as visiting Eulalia Emetaz professors such as opens the modern Mark Rothko. gallery La Galeria Escondida in Taos, which will features many of the contemporary artists in Taos and Albuquerque. a timeline 1947 1948 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 Jackson Pollock Willem de Kooning The Jonson Gallery, Diebenkorn pursues Edward Corbett Harold Rosenberg Dord Fitz opens a Robert Motherwell Clement Greenberg Jackson Pollock Elaine de Kooning Congress approves creates his first creates a series of named for artist his Master of Fine and Clay Spohn publishes modern gallery teaches at the publishes his dies in a car crash visits Amarillo at creation of drip paintings. highly expressive Raymond Jonson, Arts degree at move to Taos, and “The American in Amarillo. Colorado Springs landmark essay in East Hampton, the invitation of the National black and white opens at the the University of Robert McChesney Action Painters” Fine Arts Center. “American-Type New York. artist and gallery Aeronautics Eugene Bavinger pictures that have University of New New Mexico. Rita visits that in ARTnews. Painting,” in owner Dord Fitz. and Space joins the OU School loose, ‘all-over’ Mexico, providing Deanin Abbey and same year. Partisan Review. Administration, of Art faculty. Over compositions. a forum for Charles Littler are Helen Frankenthaler The Soviet Union replacing the the next decade, contemporary art. fellow students. creates Mountains Jermayne launches Sputnik 1. National Advisory Mark Rothko paints the faculty will and Sea, her first MacAgy, formerly Committee for his first pictures Emerson Woelffer major “stain” Aeronautics. include John Eighteen Abstract the curator of the Richard Stout using luminous joins the faculty painting, which O’Neil, Duayne Expressionists sign California Palace returns to Houston rectangles of of the Colorado influences the Elaine de Kooning Hatchett, and Jim a letter (printed of the Legion of after study at the color. He banishes Springs Fine emergence of a accepts a Visiting Henkle. in the New York Honor, arrives in Art Institute of figures entirely; his Arts Center. second generation Professorship at Times) to the Houston to direct Chicago. Over compositions are of Abstract the University of Metropolitan the Contemporary the next decade, defined by soft- Charles Truett Expressionists. New Mexico. Her Museum, New Arts Association. he will be part of edged blocks of Williams begins a vital modernist students include colors, which seem York, accusing it of visiting Taos William Conger being “notoriously community that to float on fields of regularly during Dorothy Miller’s includes Jack and William stained color. hostile to the decade. Fifteen Americans Vaughn Howard. advanced art.” Boynton, Dorothy opens at the Hood, Leila Museum of When Jermayne Budget cuts at the McConnell, and Modern Art, NYC. MacAgy’s California School Dick Wray. The exhibition contract at the of Fine Arts force includes Contemporary the departure Edward Corbett. Arts Association of numerous is not renewed, faculty over the Dominique de next two years, Jack Boynton visits Menil arranges for including Clyfford Taos and returns her to chair the art Still, Richard regularly until 1956. department at the Diebenkorn, University of Edward Corbett, Taos Painting: St. Thomas. Clay Spohn, and Yesterday and Robert McChesney. Today opens at the Colorado Springs Fine Arts Center and features Corbett, Mandelman, Ribak, and Spohn. 1959 1960 1961 1965 1968 1969 Douglas MacAgy Jack Boynton James Johnson John O’Neil, Stanley Kubrick’s Apollo 11 lands accepts the begins a two- Sweeney is director of the 2001: A Space on the moon. directorship of the year tenure at the appointed the OU School of Odyssey Dallas Museum of California School director of the Art since 1951, is released. Contemporary Art. of Fine Arts. Museum of Fine accepts the Arts, Houston. directorship of Duayne Hatchett the art program begins visiting The Lyndon at Rice University. Charles Williams B. Johnson in Fort Worth Space Center regularly, until the is completed in latter’s death Houston. in 1966..
Recommended publications
  • BLACK Baselitz, De Kooning, Mariscotti, Motherwell, Serra
    Upsilon Gallery 404 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10018 [email protected] www.upsilongallery.com For immediate release BLACK Baselitz, de Kooning, Mariscotti, Motherwell, Serra April 13 – June 3, 2017 Curated by Marcelo Zimmler Spanish Elegy I, Lithograph, on brown HMP handmade paper, 13 3/4 x 30 7/8 in. (35 x 78.5 cm), 1975. Photo by Caius Filimon Upsilon Gallery is pleased to present Black, an exhibition of original and edition work by Georg BaselitZ, Willem de Kooning, Osvaldo Mariscotti, Robert Motherwell and Richard Serra, on view at 146 West 57 Street in New York. Curated by Marcelo Zimmler, the exhibition explores the role played by the color black in Post-war and Contemporary work. In the 1960s, Georg BaselitZ emerged as a pioneer of German Neo–Expressionist painting. His work evokes disquieting subjects rendered feverishly as a means of confronting the realities of the modern age, and explores what it is to be German and a German artist in a postwar world. In the late 1970s his iconic “upside-down” paintings, in which bodies, landscapes, and buildings are inverted within the picture plane ignoring the realities of the physical world, make obvious the artifice of painting. Drawing upon a dynamic and myriad pool of influences, including art of the Mannerist period, African sculptures, and Soviet era illustration art, BaselitZ developed a distinct painting language. Upsilon Gallery 404 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10018 [email protected] www.upsilongallery.com Willem de Kooning was born on April 24, 1904, into a working class family in Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins and Meanings of Non-Objective Art by Adam Mccauley
    The Origins and Meanings of Non-Objective Art The Origins and Meanings of Non-Objective Art Adam McCauley, Studio Art- Painting Pope Wright, MS, Department of Fine Arts ABSTRACT Through my research I wanted to find out the ideas and meanings that the originators of non- objective art had. In my research I also wanted to find out what were the artists’ meanings be it symbolic or geometric, ideas behind composition, and the reasons for such a dramatic break from the academic tradition in painting and the arts. Throughout the research I also looked into the resulting conflicts that this style of art had with critics, academia, and ultimately governments. Ultimately I wanted to understand if this style of art could be continued in the Post-Modern era and if it could continue its vitality in the arts today as it did in the past. Introduction Modern art has been characterized by upheavals, break-ups, rejection, acceptance, and innovations. During the 20th century the development and innovations of art could be compared to that of science. Science made huge leaps and bounds; so did art. The innovations in travel and flight, the finding of new cures for disease, and splitting the atom all affected the artists and their work. Innovative artists and their ideas spurred revolutionary art and followers. In Paris, Pablo Picasso had fragmented form with the Cubists. In Italy, there was Giacomo Balla and his Futurist movement. In Germany, Wassily Kandinsky was working with the group the Blue Rider (Der Blaue Reiter), and in Russia Kazimer Malevich was working in a style that he called Suprematism.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Issues in the Conservation of Contemporary Art and Its Non-Traditional Materials
    Sotheby's Institute of Art Digital Commons @ SIA MA Theses Student Scholarship and Creative Work 2018 Current Issues in the Conservation of Contemporary Art and its Non-traditional Materials Sandra Hong Sotheby's Institute of Art Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.sia.edu/stu_theses Part of the Art and Materials Conservation Commons, Contemporary Art Commons, Interactive Arts Commons, and the Interdisciplinary Arts and Media Commons Recommended Citation Hong, Sandra, "Current Issues in the Conservation of Contemporary Art and its Non-traditional Materials" (2018). MA Theses. 15. https://digitalcommons.sia.edu/stu_theses/15 This Thesis - Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship and Creative Work at Digital Commons @ SIA. It has been accepted for inclusion in MA Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ SIA. For more information, please contact [email protected]. High or Low? The Value of Transitional Paintings by Jackson Pollock, Willem de Kooning, and Mark Rothko Monica Peacock A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the Master’s Degree in Art Business Sotheby’s Institute of Art 2018 12,043 Words High or Low? The Value of Transitional Paintings by Jackson Pollock, Willem de Kooning, and Mark Rothko By: Monica Peacock Abstract: Transitional works of art are an anomaly in the field of fine art appraisals. While they represent mature works stylistically and/or contextually, they lack certain technical or compositional elements unique to that artist, complicating the process for identifying comparables. Since minimal research currently exists on the value of these works, this study sought to standardize the process for identifying transitional works across multiple artists’ markets and assess their financial value on a broad scale through an analysis of three artists: Jackson Pollock, Willem de Kooning, and Mark Rothko.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of War on Art: the Work of Mark Rothko Elizabeth Leigh Doland Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Master's Theses Graduate School 2010 The effect of war on art: the work of Mark Rothko Elizabeth Leigh Doland Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Recommended Citation Doland, Elizabeth Leigh, "The effect of war on art: the work of Mark Rothko" (2010). LSU Master's Theses. 2986. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/2986 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Master's Theses by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EFFECT OF WAR ON ART: THE WORK OF MARK ROTHKO A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Liberal Arts in The Interdepartmental Program in Liberal Arts by Elizabeth Doland B.A., Louisiana State University, 2007 May 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT…………………………………………………………………iii CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION……………………………………………........1 2 EARLY LIFE……………………………………………………....3 Yale Years……………………………………………………6 Beginning Life as Artist……………………………………...7 Milton Avery…………………………………………………9 3 GREAT DEPRESSION EFFECTS………………………………...13 Artists’ Union………………………………………………...15 The Ten……………………………………………………….17 WPA………………………………………………………….19
    [Show full text]
  • The Greatest Artists of the Twentieth Century
    This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Conceptual Revolutions in Twentieth-Century Art Volume Author/Editor: David W. Galenson Volume Publisher: Cambridge University Press Volume ISBN: 978-0-521-11232-1 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/gale08-1 Publication Date: October 2009 Title: The Greatest Artists of the Twentieth Century Author: David W. Galenson URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c5785 Chapter 2: The Greatest Artists of the Twentieth Century Introduction The masters, truth to tell, are judged as much by their influence as by their works. Emile Zola, 18841 Important artists are innovators: they are important because they change the way their successors work. The more widespread, and the more profound, the changes due to the work of any artist, the greater is the importance of that artist. Recognizing the source of artistic importance points to a method of measuring it. Surveys of art history are narratives of the contributions of individual artists. These narratives describe and explain the changes that have occurred over time in artists’ practices. It follows that the importance of an artist can be measured by the attention devoted to his work in these narratives. The most important artists, whose contributions fundamentally change the course of their discipline, cannot be omitted from any such narrative, and their innovations must be analyzed at length; less important artists can either be included or excluded, depending on the length of the specific narrative treatment and the tastes of the author, and if they are included their contributions can be treated more summarily.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Morris, Minimalism, and the 1960S
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 1988 The Politics of Experience: Robert Morris, Minimalism, and the 1960s Maurice Berger Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/1646 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] INFORMATION TO USERS The most advanced technology has been used to photograph and reproduce this manuscript from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorful Language: Morris Louis, Formalist
    © COPYRIGHT by Paul Vincent 2014 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED To UNC-G professor Dr. Richard Gantt and my mother, for their inspiration and encouragement. COLORFUL LANGUAGE: MORRIS LOUIS, FORMALIST CRITICISM, AND MASCULINITY IN POSTWAR AMERICA BY Paul Vincent ABSTRACT American art at mid-century went through a pivotal shift when the dominant gestural style of Abstract Expressionism was criticized for its expressive painterly qualities in the 1950s. By 1960, critics such as Clement Greenberg and Michael Fried were already championing Color Field painting for its controlled use of color and flattened abstract forms. Morris Louis, whose art typifies this latter style, and the criticism written about his work provides a crucial insight into the socio-cultural implications behind this stylistic shift. An analysis of the formalist writing Greenberg used to promote Louis’s work provides a better understanding of not only postwar American art but also the concepts of masculinity and gender hierarchy that factored into how it was discussed at the time. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to extend my thanks Dr. Helen Langa and Dr. Andrea Pearson for their wisdom, guidance, and patience through the writing of this thesis. I would also like to thank Dr. Juliet Bellow, Dr. Joanne Allen, and Mrs. Kathe Albrecht for their unwavering academic support. I am equally grateful to my peers, Neda Amouzadeh, Lily Sehn, Kathryn Fay, Caitlin Glosser, Can Gulan, Rachael Gustafson, Jill Oakley, Carol Brown, and Fanna Gebreyesus, for their indispensable assistance and kind words. My sincere appreciation goes to The Phillips Collection for allowing me the peace of mind that came with working within its walls and to Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • The Canonisation of Surrealism in the United States
    The canonisation of Surrealism in the United States Sandra Zalman In a pointed assessment of the first show of Surrealism in New York, in 1932, the New York Times art critic asked, ‘How much of the material now on view shall we esteem “art,” and how much should be enjoyed as laboratory roughage’?1 The question encompassed the problem Surrealism posed for art history because it essentially went unanswered. Even after the 1936 endorsement by the Museum of Modern Art in a show organized by its founding director Alfred Barr (1902-1981), Surrealism continued to have a vexed relationship with the canon of modern art. Above all, the enterprise of canonisation is ironic for Surrealism – the Surrealists were self-consciously aiming to overthrow the category of art, but simultaneously participating in a tradition of avant-gardism defined by such revolution.2 Framing his exhibition, Barr presented Surrealism as both the most recent avant-garde export, and also as a purposeful departure from the avant-garde’s experimentation in form. Instead, Barr stressed that Surrealism focused on an anti-rationalist approach to representation. Though Barr made a strong case to integrate Surrealism into the broader understanding of modernism in the 1930s, and Surrealism was generally accepted by American audiences as the next European avant-garde, by the 1950s formalist critics in the U.S. positioned Surrealism as a disorderly aberration in modernism’s quest for abstraction. Surrealism’s political goals and commercial manifestations (which Barr’s exhibition had implicitly sanctioned by including cartoons and advertisements) became more and more untenable for the movement’s acceptance into a modern art canon that was increasingly being formulated around an idea of the autonomous self-reflexive work of art.
    [Show full text]
  • FY 15 ANNUAL REPORT August 1, 2014- July 31, 2015
    FY 15 ANNUAL REPORT August 1, 2014- July 31, 2015 1 THE PHILLIPS COLLECTION FY15 Annual Report THE PHILLIPS [IS] A MULTIDIMENSIONAL INSTITUTION THAT CRAVES COLOR, CONNECTEDNESS, A PIONEERING SPIRIT, AND PERSONAL EXPERIENCES 2 THE PHILLIPS COLLECTION FY15 Annual Report FROM THE CHAIRMAN AND DIRECTOR This is an incredibly exciting time to be involved with The Phillips Collection. Duncan Phillips had a deep understanding of the “joy-giving, life-enhancing influence” of art, and this connection between art and well-being has always been a driving force. Over the past year, we have continued to push boundaries and forge new paths with that sentiment in mind, from our art acquisitions to our engaging educational programming. Our colorful new visual identity—launched in fall 2014—grew out of the idea of the Phillips as a multidimensional institution, a museum that craves color, connectedness, a pioneering spirit, and personal experiences. Our programming continues to deepen personal conversations with works of art. Art and Wellness: Creative Aging, our collaboration with Iona Senior Services has continued to help participants engage personal memories through conversations and the creating of art. Similarly, our award-winning Contemplation Audio Tour encourages visitors to harness the restorative power of art by deepening their relationship with the art on view. With Duncan Phillips’s philosophies leading the way, we have significantly expanded the collection. The promised gift of 18 American sculptors’ drawings from Trustee Linda Lichtenberg Kaplan, along with the gift of 46 major works by contemporary German and Danish artists from Michael Werner, add significantly to new possibilities that further Phillips’s vision of vital “creative conversations” in our intimate galleries.
    [Show full text]
  • 76 Jefferson Fall Penthouse Art Lending Service Exhibition
    The Museum of Modern Art U West 53 Street, New York, N.Y. 10019 Tel. 956-6100 Cable: Modernart FOR RELEASE: SEPTEMBER 11, 1975 76 JEFFERSON FALL PENTHOUSE ART LENDING SERVICE EXHIBITION 76 JEFFERSON, an exhibition of 38 works produced at that Lower East Side New York address, is the Fall Penthouse exhibition of the Art Lending Service of The Museum of Modern Art, and will be on view from September 11 through December 1. Because of the large number of artists who have lived and worked in the building, the group of works reflects the diversity of art produced in New York 'during the last 15 years. Works by 18 artists in a variety of styles and mediums are included — abstract and realistic painting, sculpture in various materials, and drawings and prints. In addition, there are silkscreen prints published by Chiron Press, which was also located at 76 Jefferson Street from 1963 to 1967. The exhibition has been organized by Richard Marshall, se­ lections advisor to the Museum's Art Lending Service, and all of the works are for sale. The artists represented in the exhibition who lived and/or worked at 76 Jefferson Street are Milet Andrejevic, E. H. Davis, John Duff, Mel Edwards, Janet Fish, Valerie Jaudon, Neil Jenney, Richard Kalina, Kenneth Kilstrom, Kobashi, Robert Lobe, Brice Marden, Robert Neuwirth, Steve Poleskie, David Robinson, Ed Shostak, Gary Stephan and Neil Williams. The artists whose Chiron Press prints will be on view are Richard Anuskiewicz, Allan d'Arcangelo, Jim Dine, Rosalyn Drexler, Al Held, Robert Indiana, Alex Katz, Ellsworth Kelly, Nicholas Krushenick, Marisol, Robert Motherwell, Louise Nevelson, James Rosenquist, Saul Steinberg, Ernest Trova, Andy Warhol, Jack Youngerman, and Larry Zox.
    [Show full text]
  • HETAG: the Houston Earlier Texas Art Group
    HETAG: The Houston Earlier Texas Art Group Newsletter, June 2017 Harry Worthman [On the Gulf Coast] 1973, oil on board At the Shore Here it is summer already and for many of us that means it’s time to head for the shore. It meant that for lots of Earlier Houston Artists too, so June seems like a good time to do an At the Shore issue of the Newsletter. There will be Galveston and other Gulf Coast shores, of course, but our artists did a good job of getting around, so there will be quite a few more exotic shores too. Don’t forget to put on your sunscreen. Emma Richardson Cherry Long Beach [California] c.1922, oil on board; Jack Boynton Beach Formation 1953, oil on canvas. HETAG: The Houston Earlier Texas Art Group Eva McMurrey [At the Lake] c. 1959, oil on board Don’t Mess With Texas Art: Tam Kiehnhoff, HETAG member and collector extraordinaire, has done a terrific podcast on the adventures and joys of collecting Texas art, as part of the series “Collecting Culture.” You can hear it here: Collecting Culture – Episode 6: Don’t Mess With Texas Art HETAG Newsletter online (soon): I’m pleased to announce that back issues of the HETAG Newsletter will soon be available online, thanks to our friends at the Museum of Fine Arts Houston’s Hirsch Library. I’m talking about you, Jon Evans, librarian. In fact, they already are available if you’re on the MFAH campus, but plans are to lift that restriction as soon as some technical issues can be addressed.
    [Show full text]
  • Lost in Translation: Phenomenology and Mark Rothko's Writings
    Lost in translation: Phenomenology and Mark Rothko’s writings Evelien Boesten s4284720 M. Gieskes 09-08-2017 Table of contents: 1. Introduction 2 2. Phenomenology and its relation to art as described by Crowther 7 3. Mark Rothko I. Life and art 15 II. Rothko’s writings on art 21 III. Rothko and Crowther: a new approach to Rothko and phenomenology 31 4. Previous essays on phenomenology and Rothko I. Dahl 43 II. Svedlow 46 III. Comparison and differences: Dahl, Svedlow versus Rothko & Crowther 48 5. Conclusion 50 6. Bibliography 52 7. Image Catalogue 53 1 1. Introduction Imagine seeing a painting by Mark Rothko (1903-1970), such as Untitled (1949, fig. 1) in an art museum. Typically, Rothko’s work will be viewed in ‘white cube’ museums, such as the modern section of the National Gallery of Art in Washington DC, where Untitled (1949) resides. The room consists of simple white walls and wooden floors. The painting’s title tells you nothing but the fact that it has none. There is no shortcut to the painting’s subject to be found in its given name, and we are expected to go in significantly less biased because of the title’s absence.1 We stand before the painting, no title or picture frame between us and the canvas. Rothko wanted the interaction between the artist and the viewer to be as direct as possible, so he tried to eliminate as many external factors as he could (such as picture frames or titles).2 In Untitled (1949), the artist – Rothko – brought colour and form to this interacttion, while the viewers are expected to bring themselves and all that they know and are.3 A large yellow rectangle serves as the background to the other coloured rectangles that are brown, orange, purple, black and a semi-transparent green, which appear to float in front of it.4 These smaller rectangles do not only relate to the yellow background, but to each other as well.
    [Show full text]