Nobel Prize & Award Winners Supported By

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Appendix V. Nobel Prize & Award Winners supported by NSF Nobel Prize Winners Chemistry Year Institution Roderick MacKinnon 2003 Rockefeller University Peter Agre 2003 Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Robert H. Grubbs 2005 California Institute of Technology Richard R. Schrock 2005 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Physics Anthony J. Leggett 2003 University of Illinois David J. Gross 2004 University of California H. David Politzer 2004 California Institute of Technology Frank Wilczek 2004 Massachusetts Institute of Technology Roy J. Glauber 2005 Harvard University John L. Hall 2005 University of Colorado Theodor W. Hänsch 2005 Ludwig Maximilian University (Germany) George F. Smoot 2006 University of California Economics Robert F. Engle III 2003 New York University Clive W.J. Granger 2003 University of California Finn E. Kydland 2004 Carnegie Mellon University University of California Edward C. Prescott 2004 Arizona State University Federal State Reserve Bank Robert J. Aumann 2005 University of Jerusalem Thomas C. Schelling 2005 U niversity of Maryland Edmund S. Phelps 2006 Columbia University Leonid Hurwicz 2007 University of Minnesota Eric S. Maskin 2007 Princeton University - Institute for Advanced Study Roger B. Myerson 2007 University of Chicago Medicine Paul C. Lauterber 2003 U niversity of Illinois Richard Axel 2004 Columbia University Mario R. Capecchi 2005 University of Utah Howard Hughes Medical Institute 39 Awards National Medal of Science Laureates 2006 Institution Hyman Bass University ofMichigan Marvin H. Caruthers University ofColorado Rita A. Colwell University ofMaryland Peter B. Dervan California Institute ofTechnology Nina V. Fedoroff Pennsylvania StateUniversity Daniel Kleppner Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology Robert S. Langer Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology Lubert Stryer Stanford University National Medal of Science Laureates 2005 Jan D. Achenbach Northwestern University Ralph A. Alpher The Dudley Observatory Gordon H. Bower Stanford University Bradley Efron Stanford University Anthony S. Fauci National Institutes ofHealth Tobin J. Marks Northwestern University Lonnie G. Thompson Ohio StateUniversity Torsten N. Wiesel The Rockefeller University 40 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Vision: from Photon to Perception
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 557-559, January 1996 Colloquium Paper This paper serves as an introduction to the foUlowing papers, which were presented at a colloquium entitled "Vision: From Photon to Perception, " organized by John Dowling, Lubert Stryer (chair), and Torsten Wiesel, held May 20-22, 1995, at the National Academy of Sciences in Irvine, CA. Vision: From photon to perception LUBERT STRYER Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 A National Academy of Sciences colloquium entitled "Vision: vation pathway. A rich harvest is being reaped from the From Photon to Perception" was held at the Beckman Center concerted use of electrophysiological and molecular genetic of the Academy in Irvine, California, on May 20-22, 1995. The techniques. meeting was organized by John Dowling, Lubert Stryer (chair), A workshop entitled "Amplification in Phototransduction," and Torsten Wiesel. The aim of the colloquium was to bring chaired by Trevor Lamb, further explored the cyclic GMP together leading scientists and students from different disci- cascade of vertebrate vision. Lamb (2) presented a stochastic plines ofvision research ranging from physics to psychology to simulation of the photoactivation of the cyclic GMP phos- define and explore the most challenging questions in the field. phodiesterase. The simulated rising phase of the photocurrent One hundred forty scientists participated in the colloquium. agrees closely with the response of intact rods as measured We are indebted to Silicon Graphics, Inc., and the Ruth and electrophysiologically. This modeling approach will be useful Milton Steinbach Fund, Inc., for generous grants that helped in testing our emerging grasp ofhow the cascade is deactivated.
[Show full text]
R Mathematics Esearch Eports
Mathematics r research reports M r Boris Hasselblatt, Svetlana Katok, Michele Benzi, Dmitry Burago, Alessandra Celletti, Tobias Holck Colding, Brian Conrey, Josselin Garnier, Timothy Gowers, Robert Griess, Linus Kramer, Barry Mazur, Walter Neumann, Alexander Olshanskii, Christopher Sogge, Benjamin Sudakov, Hugh Woodin, Yuri Zarhin, Tamar Ziegler Editorial Volume 1 (2020), p. 1-3. <http://mrr.centre-mersenne.org/item/MRR_2020__1__1_0> © The journal and the authors, 2020. Some rights reserved. This article is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Mathematics Research Reports is member of the Centre Mersenne for Open Scientific Publishing www.centre-mersenne.org Mathema tics research reports Volume 1 (2020), 1–3 Editorial This is the inaugural volume of Mathematics Research Reports, a journal owned by mathematicians, and dedicated to the principles of fair open access and academic self- determination. Articles in Mathematics Research Reports are freely available for a world-wide audi- ence, with no author publication charges (diamond open access) but high production value, thanks to financial support from the Anatole Katok Center for Dynamical Sys- tems and Geometry at the Pennsylvania State University and to the infrastructure of the Centre Mersenne. The articles in MRR are research announcements of significant ad- vances in all branches of mathematics, short complete papers of original research (up to about 15 journal pages), and review articles (up to about 30 journal pages). They communicate their contents to a broad mathematical audience and should meet high standards for mathematical content and clarity. The entire Editorial Board approves the acceptance of any paper for publication, and appointments to the board are made by the board itself.
[Show full text]
Metabelian Groups with the Same Finite Quotients
BULL. AUSTRAL. MATH. SOC. 20E25, 20EI5, I6A64 VOL. II (1974), 115-120. Metabelian groups with the same finite quotients P.F. Pickel Let F(G) denote the set of isomorphism classes of finite quotients of the group G . Two groups G and H are said to have the same finite quotients if F(G) = T(H) . We construct infinitely many nonisomorphic finitely presented metabelian groups with the same finite quotients, using modules over a suitably chosen ring. These groups also give an example of infinitely many nonisomorphic split extensions of a fixed finitely presented metabelian. group by a fixed finite abelian group, all having the same finite quotients. Let F(G) denote the set of isomorphism classes of finite quotients of the group G . We say groups G and H have the same finite quotients if F(G) = F(fl) . Many examples have been given of nonisomorphic groups with the same finite quotients ([77], [5H, [4], [9], [72]). In each of these examples the groups are polycyclic and the number of nonisomorphic groups with the same finite quotients is finite. In fact, it has been shown ([70]) that for the class of nilpotent-by-finite groups, the number of isomorphism classes of groups with the same finite quotients must always be finite. In this paper, we construct infinitely many nonisomorphic finitely presented metabelian groups with the same finite quotients. Since metabelian groups are residually finite ([7]) and satisfy the maximal condition for normal subgroups ([6]), it seems that rather stringent conditions must hold in order that the number of groups with the same finite quotients be finite.
[Show full text]
2016-2017 Year Book Www
1 2016-2017 YEAR BOOK WWW. C A R N E G I E S C I E N C E . E D U Department of Embryology 3520 San Martin Dr. / Baltimore, MD 21218 410.246.3001 Geophysical Laboratory 5251 Broad Branch Rd., N.W. / Washington, DC 20015-1305 202.478.8900 Department of Global Ecology 260 Panama St. / Stanford, CA 94305-4101 650.462.1047 The Carnegie Observatories 813 Santa Barbara St. / Pasadena, CA 91101-1292 626.577.1122 Las Campanas Observatory Casilla 601 / La Serena, Chile Department of Plant Biology 260 Panama St. / Stanford, CA 94305-4101 650.325.1521 Department of Terrestrial Magnetism 5241 Broad Branch Rd., N.W. / Washington, DC 20015-1305 202.478.8820 Office of Administration 1530 P St., N.W. / Washington, DC 20005-1910 202.387.6400 2 0 1 6 - 2 0 1 7 Y E A R B O O K The President’s Report July 1, 2016 - June 30, 2017 C A R N E G I E I N S T I T U T I O N F O R S C I E N C E Former Presidents Daniel C. Gilman, 1902–1904 Robert S. Woodward, 1904–1920 John C. Merriam, 1921–1938 Vannevar Bush, 1939–1955 Caryl P. Haskins, 1956–1971 Philip H. Abelson, 1971–1978 James D. Ebert, 1978–1987 Edward E. David, Jr. (Acting President, 1987–1988) Maxine F. Singer, 1988–2002 Michael E. Gellert (Acting President, Jan.–April 2003) Richard A. Meserve, 2003–2014 Former Trustees Philip H. Abelson, 1978–2004 Patrick E.
[Show full text]
The Meaning of Probability
CHAPTER 2 THE MEANING OF PROBABILITY INTRODUCTION by Glenn Shafer The meaning of probability has been debated since the mathematical theory of probability was formulated in the late 1600s. The five articles in this section have been selected to provide perspective on the history and present state of this debate. Mathematical statistics provided the main arena for debating the meaning of probability during the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. The debate was conducted mainly between two camps, the subjectivists and the frequentists. The subjectivists contended that the probability of an event is the degree to which someone believes it, as indicated by their willingness to bet or take other actions. The frequentists contended that probability of an event is the frequency with which it occurs. Leonard J. Savage (1917-1971), the author of our first article, was an influential subjectivist. Bradley Efron, the author of our second article, is a leading contemporary frequentist. A newer debate, dating only from the 1950s and conducted more by psychologists and economists than by statisticians, has been concerned with whether the rules of probability are descriptive of human behavior or instead normative for human and machine reasoning. This debate has inspired empirical studies of the ways people violate the rules. In our third article, Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman report on some of the results of these studies. In our fourth article, Amos Tversky and I propose that we resolve both debates by formalizing a constructive interpretation of probability. According to this interpretation, probabilities are degrees of belief deliberately constructed and adopted on the basis of evidence, and frequencies are only one among many types of evidence.
[Show full text]
Nobel Laureates Endorse Joe Biden
Nobel Laureates endorse Joe Biden 81 American Nobel Laureates in Physics, Chemistry, and Medicine have signed this letter to express their support for former Vice President Joe Biden in the 2020 election for President of the United States. At no time in our nation’s history has there been a greater need for our leaders to appreciate the value of science in formulating public policy. During his long record of public service, Joe Biden has consistently demonstrated his willingness to listen to experts, his understanding of the value of international collaboration in research, and his respect for the contribution that immigrants make to the intellectual life of our country. As American citizens and as scientists, we wholeheartedly endorse Joe Biden for President. Name Category Prize Year Peter Agre Chemistry 2003 Sidney Altman Chemistry 1989 Frances H. Arnold Chemistry 2018 Paul Berg Chemistry 1980 Thomas R. Cech Chemistry 1989 Martin Chalfie Chemistry 2008 Elias James Corey Chemistry 1990 Joachim Frank Chemistry 2017 Walter Gilbert Chemistry 1980 John B. Goodenough Chemistry 2019 Alan Heeger Chemistry 2000 Dudley R. Herschbach Chemistry 1986 Roald Hoffmann Chemistry 1981 Brian K. Kobilka Chemistry 2012 Roger D. Kornberg Chemistry 2006 Robert J. Lefkowitz Chemistry 2012 Roderick MacKinnon Chemistry 2003 Paul L. Modrich Chemistry 2015 William E. Moerner Chemistry 2014 Mario J. Molina Chemistry 1995 Richard R. Schrock Chemistry 2005 K. Barry Sharpless Chemistry 2001 Sir James Fraser Stoddart Chemistry 2016 M. Stanley Whittingham Chemistry 2019 James P. Allison Medicine 2018 Richard Axel Medicine 2004 David Baltimore Medicine 1975 J. Michael Bishop Medicine 1989 Elizabeth H. Blackburn Medicine 2009 Michael S.
[Show full text]
American Researchers Richard Axel and Linda B. Buck Were the Winners
NOSSA CAPA OUR MAGAZINE J Bras Patol Med Lab • Volume 40 • Número 6 • Dezembro 2004 ISSN 1676-2444 • Volume 40 • NúmeroISSN 1 • Março 1676-2444 2004 COVER Richard Axel e Linda B. Buck, ganhadores do Prêmio Nobel de Medicina de 2004 importantes do olfato, um campo em que as pesquisas em todo o mundo estavam atrasadas em relação aos estudos dos demais sentidos. A descoberta dos cientistas reaﬁrma a importância do Press sistema olfativo na qualidade de vida do homem e no sen- Folha Folha tido do paladar. O porta-voz do Instituto Karolinska disse oto: oto: F que “um bom vinho ou um morango maduro nos ajuda a detectar as qualidades que consideramos positivas. Um odor singular pode despertar velhas recordações”. Os princípios desvendados por Axel e Buck para o sistema olfativo também podem ser aplicados a outros sentidos. Os norte-americanos Richard Axel e Linda B. Buck foram os Aﬁnal, os feromônios, cujo papel é importante no com- ganhadores do Prêmio Nobel de Medicina de 2004 pelos portamento social e sexual dos animais, são moléculas seus estudos sobre os receptores olfativos e a organização também detectadas por receptores igualmente localiza- do sistema olfativo nos seres humanos. dos no epitélio nasal. Os dois pesquisadores foram premiados porque, em seus Os dois pesquisadores americanos publicaram conjunta- centros de estudos nos Estados Unidos, descobriram mente suas descobertas em 1991 e posteriormente uma grande família genética constituída por cerca de mil continuaram com as pesquisas em seus centros de genes diferentes – 3% do nosso padrão genético – que pesquisa. estão na origem de um número equivalente de tipos de Linda Buck tem 57 anos e é pesquisadora do Fred Hutch- receptores olfativos.
[Show full text]
Medical Advisory Board September 1, 2006–August 31, 2007
hoWard hughes medical iNstitute 2007 annual report What’s Next h o W ard hughes medical i 4000 oNes Bridge road chevy chase, marylaNd 20815-6789 www.hhmi.org N stitute 2007 a nn ual report What’s Next Letter from the president 2 The primary purpose and objective of the conversation: wiLLiam r. Lummis 6 Howard Hughes Medical Institute shall be the promotion of human knowledge within the CREDITS thiNkiNg field of the basic sciences (principally the field of like medical research and education) and the a scieNtist 8 effective application thereof for the benefit of mankind. Page 1 Page 25 Page 43 Page 50 seeiNg Illustration by Riccardo Vecchio Südhof: Paul Fetters; Fuchs: Janelia Farm lab: © Photography Neurotoxin (Brunger & Chapman): Page 3 Matthew Septimus; SCNT images: by Brad Feinknopf; First level of Rongsheng Jin and Axel Brunger; iN Bruce Weller Blake Porch and Chris Vargas/HHMI lab building: © Photography by Shadlen: Paul Fetters; Mouse Page 6 Page 26 Brad Feinknopf (Tsai): Li-Huei Tsai; Zoghbi: Agapito NeW Illustration by Riccardo Vecchio Arabidopsis: Laboratory of Joanne Page 44 Sanchez/Baylor College 14 Page 8 Chory; Chory: Courtesy of Salk Janelia Farm guest housing: © Jeff Page 51 Ways Illustration by Riccardo Vecchio Institute Goldberg/Esto; Dudman: Matthew Szostak: Mark Wilson; Evans: Fred Page 10 Page 27 Septimus; Lee: Oliver Wien; Greaves/PR Newswire, © HHMI; Mello: Erika Larsen; Hannon: Zack Rosenthal: Paul Fetters; Students: Leonardo: Paul Fetters; Riddiford: Steitz: Harold Shapiro; Lefkowitz: capacity Seckler/AP, © HHMI; Lowe: Zack Paul Fetters; Map: Reprinted by Paul Fetters; Truman: Paul Fetters Stewart Waller/PR Newswire, Seckler/AP, © HHMI permission from Macmillan Page 46 © HHMI for Page 12 Publishers, Ltd.: Nature vol.
[Show full text]
Strength in Numbers: the Rising of Academic Statistics Departments In
Agresti · Meng Agresti Eds. Alan Agresti · Xiao-Li Meng Editors Strength in Numbers: The Rising of Academic Statistics DepartmentsStatistics in the U.S. Rising of Academic The in Numbers: Strength Statistics Departments in the U.S. Strength in Numbers: The Rising of Academic Statistics Departments in the U.S. Alan Agresti • Xiao-Li Meng Editors Strength in Numbers: The Rising of Academic Statistics Departments in the U.S. 123 Editors Alan Agresti Xiao-Li Meng Department of Statistics Department of Statistics University of Florida Harvard University Gainesville, FL Cambridge, MA USA USA ISBN 978-1-4614-3648-5 ISBN 978-1-4614-3649-2 (eBook) DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-3649-2 Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2012942702 Ó Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer.
[Show full text]
Cramer, and Rao
2000 PARZEN PRIZE FOR STATISTICAL INNOVATION awarded by TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF STATISTICS to C. R. RAO April 24, 2000 292 Breezeway MSC 4 pm Pictures from Parzen Prize Presentation and Reception, 4/24/2000 The 2000 EMANUEL AND CAROL PARZEN PRIZE FOR STATISTICAL INNOVATION is awarded to C. Radhakrishna Rao (Eberly Professor of Statistics, and Director of the Center for Multivariate Analysis, at the Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802) for outstanding distinction and eminence in research on the theory of statistics, in applications of statistical methods in diverse fields, in providing international leadership for 55 years in directing statistical research centers, in continuing impact through his vision and effectiveness as a scholar and teacher, and in extensive service to American and international society. The year 2000 motivates us to plan for the future of the discipline of statistics which emerged in the 20th century as a firmly grounded mathematical science due to the pioneering research of Pearson, Gossett, Fisher, Neyman, Hotelling, Wald, Cramer, and Rao. Numerous honors and awards to Rao demonstrate the esteem in which he is held throughout the world for his unusually distinguished and productive life. C. R. Rao was born September 10, 1920, received his Ph.D. from Cambridge University (England) in 1948, and has been awarded 22 honorary doctorates. He has worked at the Indian Statistical Institute (1944-1992), University of Pittsburgh (1979- 1988), and Pennsylvania State University (1988- ). Professor Rao is the author (or co-author) of 14 books and over 300 publications. His pioneering contributions (in linear models, multivariate analysis, design of experiments and combinatorics, probability distribution characterizations, generalized inverses, and robust inference) are taught in statistics textbooks.
[Show full text]
Schedule of C Ourses
2017–2018 Schedule of Courses Schedule The David Rockefeller Graduate Program offers a Required reading: Molecular Biology of the Cell by Bruce Alberts et al.; Molecular Cell Biology by James E. Darnell et al. selection of courses, many of which students can Recommended reading: Basic Histology by Luiz Carlos Junqueira choose based on their interests and area of thesis et al. research. Organized by Rockefeller faculty, and taught Method of evaluation: Attendance, participation in the discussions, by scientists at the top of their fields, both from within student presentations, and a final oral exam and outside of the university, these courses are designed to provide a stimulating and dynamic curriculum that Cell Cycle Control students can tailor to fit their personal goals, in FREDERICK R. CROSS and HIRONORI FUNABIKI consultation with the dean of graduate studies. This seminar explores the current understanding of eukaryotic cell cycle control. Topics include the construction of a biochemical oscillator and overall structure of cell cycle control; positive and Biochemical and Biophysical Methods negative control of DNA replication; spindle morphogenesis and function; chromosome cohesion control; surveillance mechanisms SETH A. DARST and MICHAEL P. ROUT (checkpoints) monitoring spindle and DNA integrity; and control of This course presents the fundamental principles of biochemistry proliferation (start/restriction point control). The seminar relies heavily and biophysics, with an emphasis on methodologies. It addresses on studies in model organisms, but the emphasis throughout will be issues of protein and nucleic acid structure and the forces that on aspects of cell cycle control conserved among eukaryotes. underlie stability and govern the formation of specific three- Class length and frequency: 2.5-hour lecture and discussion, dimensional structures.
[Show full text]
Irving Kaplansky
Portraying and remembering Irving Kaplansky Hyman Bass University of Michigan Mathematical Sciences Research Institute • February 23, 2007 1 Irving (“Kap”) Kaplansky “infinitely algebraic” “I liked the algebraic way of looking at things. I’m additionally fascinated when the algebraic method is applied to infinite objects.” 1917 - 2006 A Gallery of Portraits 2 Family portrait: Kap as son • Born 22 March, 1917 in Toronto, (youngest of 4 children) shortly after his parents emigrated to Canada from Poland. • Father Samuel: Studied to be a rabbi in Poland; worked as a tailor in Toronto. • Mother Anna: Little schooling, but enterprising: “Health Bread Bakeries” supported (& employed) the whole family 3 Kap’s father’s grandfather Kap’s father’s parents Kap (age 4) with family 4 Family Portrait: Kap as father • 1951: Married Chellie Brenner, a grad student at Harvard Warm hearted, ebullient, outwardly emotional (unlike Kap) • Three children: Steven, Alex, Lucy "He taught me and my brothers a lot, (including) what is really the most important lesson: to do the thing you love and not worry about making money." • Died 25 June, 2006, at Steven’s home in Sherman Oaks, CA Eight months before his death he was still doing mathematics. Steven asked, -“What are you working on, Dad?” -“It would take too long to explain.” 5 Kap & Chellie marry 1951 Family portrait, 1972 Alex Steven Lucy Kap Chellie 6 Kap – The perfect accompanist “At age 4, I was taken to a Yiddish musical, Die Goldene Kala. It was a revelation to me that there could be this kind of entertainment with music.
[Show full text]