DOCSLIB.ORG

SIS Manly Vale Public School Review – Prepared by Renata Bali

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
SIS Manly Vale Public School Review – Prepared by Renata Bali SIS Manly Vale Public School Review – Prepared by Renata Bali This review has been prepared by Dr Renata Bali from Ecosense Consulting Pty. Ltd. I was asked by EDO NSW, on behalf of the Save Manly Dam Catchment Committee, to conduct a brief ecological review of the following report: Species Impact Statement Manly Vale Public School (Kleinfelder 2016), including documents attached in Appendix 7. I previously undertook a detailed ecological assessment of the Preliminary Species Impact Statement (SIS) prepared by Kleinfelder (2015) and relevant documentation (Bali 2015 provided as Attachment 1). As part of the present review, I also considered the following: OEH Referral response to Preliminary SIS dated 30 September 2015; and Proposal for a Biobank Site at Galston Park Bushland prepared by Hornsby Shire Council (November 2016). I note that, as a result of a reconfiguration of the school buildings, the amount of vegetation to be cleared has decreased (3.65 ha vs 4.37 ha). Similarly the amount of vegetation to be managed as an Asset Protection Zone (APZ) has decreased (3.34 ha vs 4.01 ha). More extensive survey work was undertaken by Kleinfelder within the subject site and the surrounding APZ in 2015-6. In the case of flora, this included the analysis of 2 additional 20 X 20 m quadrats and 8 hours targeted search for threatened species. In the case of fauna, this included an additional 7 hours of amphibian survey, 442 remote camera nights and ~1000 arboreal trap nights (discrepancy between Table 7 in the SIS and Table 1 in Appendix 7(2). These were aimed primarily at detecting the Eastern Pygmy Possum and the Red-crowned Toadlet. Overall 14 flora species and 18 fauna species were considered as ‘subject species’. The SIS identifies three vegetation community types as being present on the subject site (p. 53) but refers to a fourth community Sandstone Gully Forest in Tables (e.g. Table 11) and maps (e.g. Appendix 7).The Preliminary SIS identified 4 vegetation communities. The SIS assessed vegetation community significance on the subject site as being Moderate for all native communities and Low for disturbed vegetation (Table 11). The Preliminary SIS ranked vegetation significance as High for all native communities and Low for disturbed vegetation (Table 11). No justification was given for this change in status. Overall, I am concerned that the SIS has not taken into account many of my previous comments, nor does it address some issues raised by OEH. In general, these are: Survey for Terrestrial Fauna Terrestrial fauna survey does not appear to be adequate considering that it was undertaken less than 5 months post-fire (Bali 2015, OEH Referral response). The Preliminary SIS excluded most terrestrial species on the basis that they were not detected by 10 hair tubes and 4 cameras distributed over the 7.6 ha subject area. However, it appears that no additional survey work was undertaken in late 2015 or 2016 even though quolls, bandicoots and the New Holland Mouse have a medium probability of occurrence on the subject site. Similarly only 2 hours of bird surveys were conducted 1 SIS Manly Vale Public School Review – Prepared by Renata Bali less than 5 months post-fire on a 7.6 ha site. In this case a precautionary approach is recommended such that any species not adequately surveyed are assumed to possible occur on-site. Impact Assessment Impacts should be assessed for the removal of 6.34 ha of vegetation because the area assumed in the SIS to have ‘no impact’ (2.64 ha) will be subject to edge effects due to the removal shrub and canopy layers within the adjacent APZ. Although the extent of edge effects may vary, an extensive literature review has shown that they can be expected to extend at least 50 m (Bali 2005). Edge effects may include direct (e.g. microclimate and soil moisture changes) and indirect impacts (e.g. increased access to introduced predators, weed invasion). There has been no consideration of the viability of retained habitat ‘islands’ subjected to edge effects. The SIS fails to describe in detail site-specific direct and indirect impacts that would be expected. Furthermore, impacts associated with the required bushfire access roads and Ausgrid’s proposed sub-station have not been considered as part of the proposal (see OEH Referral response).Amelioration measures proposed represent standard practices which could be applied to virtually any site, and do not take into account the high vegetation significance, high quality habitat and the presence 5 threatened species. The effectiveness and viability of retained habitat ‘islands’ are not assessed with respect to providing habitat and movement corridors for threatened species. Corridor Significance The assumption is made repeatedly throughout the Preliminary and Final SIS that, given that the study site adjoins Manly Dam Reserve and contains over 600 ha of ‘potential’ habitat and extending over 4.2 km to the northwest, the proposal will not result in fragmentation of habitat for threatened species. This same argument has been repeated for plants, birds, bats and small more sedentary species such as the Eastern Pygmy Possum and Red-crowned Toadlet. While this may be true for mobile fauna with broad habitat requirements, in my opinion, the removal of the subject site may significantly increase habitat fragmentation for small less mobile species. In my opinion, corridor values should be assessed at a much finer (local) scale for these species (i.e. adjacent Crown Land, Condover Reserve). Alternatively, it would be useful to include a map of all historic and current threatened species records from Manly Dam Reserve as evidence that suitable habitat exists there. The assumption is also made that the Manly Dam Reserve is ‘secure’ in terms of conservation. A rapid internet search will reveal that many vegetated areas in the locality are under threat of rezoning, development and/or commercialization. Aerial photographs of the site may lead to an assumption that Crown Land and Council- managed lands surrounding the subject site were ‘secure’, but in my opinion, this can not be guaranteed. Cumulative impacts associated with the proposal have not been assessed as per DGRs Section 5.5.1. Eastern Pygmy Possum (Appendix 7) While I am encouraged to see that the Eastern Pygmy Possum (EPP) was recorded outside the study area, the records appear to be concentrated around the subject site 2 SIS Manly Vale Public School Review – Prepared by Renata Bali and do not extend north of the Water Research Laboratory buildings or further to the west although these areas were targeted for survey. The SIS concludes that: “Considering that the species was detected both within and outside the study area during the surveys, the presence of potential habitat for this species on the subject site, and the relatively large area of potential habitat on secure lands to the north-west of the study area, the habitat loss on the subject site is considered to be of some (low) significance for this species in the locality.” I strongly disagree with this conclusion based on the lack of evidence provided to support it. In my opinion, the EPP records as shown on Figure 1 may indicate the presence of a viable local population that does not extend further into Manly Dam Reserve for any one of a number of reasons (i.e. historic, movement barriers, stochastic events). Based on the information provided, it is impossible to confirm that the population extends further to the north and west (or that any other populations occur in Manly Dam Reserve). I would have expected more detailed analysis of the recent and historical records, including: A map showing all historic and current records for this species in and around Manly Dam Reserve; An updated map showing the reconfigured school buildings and up-to-date APZs; Consultation with pygmy-possum experts; Impact assessment assuming worst-case scenario (removal of majority of habitat for a local population); Impact assessment for removal of a known den tree or, if the tree is to be retained, the impact of removing most of the habitat around it; Assessment of all potential impacts on the population, including maintenance of the APZ with fire (as requested by OEH); and Assessment of the likely effectiveness of habitat ‘islands’ in maintaining the local population of pygmy-possums. The presence of a local viable population of Eastern Pygmy-possums adjacent to an urban area is highly significant and should not be assumed to be ‘low’ without sound scientific evidence. Red-crowned Toadlet (Appendix 7) Many of the points raised above in relation to Eastern Pygmy Possums also apply to the Red-crowned Toadlet. This is a small sedentary species that is dependent on very specific habitat requirements. It appears that populations may be widely separated and it is unclear if the individuals recorded on the subject site are from the same population. As for the EPP, I would expect the SIS to contain: A map showing all historic and current records for this species in and around Manly Dam Reserve; An updated map showing the reconfigured school buildings and current up-to- date APZs; Consultation with Red-crowned Toadlet experts; Assessment of the impact of removing 0.5 ha of suitable habitat for a small relatively sedentary species; and 3 SIS Manly Vale Public School Review – Prepared by Renata Bali Assessment of the impact of removing surrounding vegetation and/or altering drainage patterns on retained toadlet habitat islands (What is the long-term viability of these ‘protection’ areas?). Without sound scientific evidence it cannot be assumed that the population of toadlets will persist on the subject site. Offsetting (Appendix 7) Offsetting should only be applied to residual impacts after every effort has been made to avoid, minimise and mitigate potential environmental impact.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Narrabeen Lakes to Manly Lagoon
    To NEWCASTLE Manly Lagoon to North Head Personal Care BARRENJOEY and The Spit Be aware that you are responsible for your own safety and that of any child with you. Take care and enjoy your walk. This magnificent walk features the famous Manly Beach, Shelly Beach, and 5hr 30 North Head which dominates the entrance to Sydney Harbour. It also links The walks require average fitness, except for full-day walks which require COASTAL SYDNEY to the popular Manly Scenic Walkway between Manly Cove and The Spit. above-average fitness and stamina. There is a wide variety of pathway alking conditions and terrain, including bush tracks, uneven ground, footpaths, The walk forms part of one of the world’s great urban coastal walks, beaches, rocks, steps and steep hills. Observe official safety, track and road signs AVALON connecting Broken Bay in Sydney’s north to Port Hacking in the south, at all times. Keep well back from cliff edges and be careful crossing roads. traversing rugged headlands, sweeping beaches, lagoons, bushland, and the w Wear a hat and good walking shoes, use sunscreen and carry water. You will Manly Lagoon bays and harbours of coastal Sydney. need to drink regularly, particularly in summer, as much of the route is without Approximate Walking Times in Hours and Minutes 5hr 30 This map covers the route from Manly Lagoon to Manly wharf via North shade. Although cold drinks can often be bought along the way, this cannot to North Head e.g. 1 hour 45 minutes = 1hr 45 Head. Two companion maps, Barrenjoey to Narrabeen Lakes and Narrabeen always be relied on.
    [Show full text]
  • Amphibian Abundance and Detection Trends During a Large Flood in a Semi-Arid Floodplain Wetland
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 11:408–425. Submitted: 26 January 2016; Accepted: 2 September 2016; Published: 16 December 2016. Amphibian Abundance and Detection Trends During a Large Flood in a Semi-Arid Floodplain Wetland Joanne F. Ocock1,4, Richard T. Kingsford1, Trent D. Penman2, and Jodi J.L. Rowley1,3 1Centre for Ecosystem Science, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, UNSW Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, 2052, Australia 2Centre for Environmental Risk Management of Bushfires, Institute of Conservation Biology and Environmental Management, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales 2522, Australia 3Australian Museum Research Institute, Australian Museum, 6 College St, Sydney, New South Wales 2010, Australia 4Corresponding author, email: [email protected] Abstract.—Amphibian abundance and occupancy are often reduced in regulated river systems near dams, but com- paratively little is known about how they are affected on floodplain wetlands downstream or the effects of actively managed flows. We assessed frog diversity in the Macquarie Marshes, a semi-arid floodplain wetland of conserva- tion significance, identifying environmental variables that might explain abundances and detection of species. We collected relative abundance data of 15 amphibian species at 30 sites over four months, coinciding with a large natural flood. We observed an average of 39.9 ± (SE) 4.3 (range, 0-246) individuals per site survey, over 47 survey nights. Three non-burrowing, ground-dwelling species were most abundant at temporarily flooded sites with low- growing aquatic vegetation (e.g., Limnodynastes tasmaniensis, Limnodynastes fletcheri, Crinia parinsignifera). Most arboreal species (e.g., Litoria caerulea) were more abundant in wooded habitat, regardless of water permanency.
    [Show full text]
  • Threat Abatement Plan
    gus resulting in ch fun ytridio trid myc chy osis ith w s n ia ib h p m a f o n o i t THREAT ABATEMENTc PLAN e f n I THREAT ABATEMENT PLAN INFECTION OF AMPHIBIANS WITH CHYTRID FUNGUS RESULTING IN CHYTRIDIOMYCOSIS Department of the Environment and Heritage © Commonwealth of Australia 2006 ISBN 0 642 55029 8 Published 2006 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from the Commonwealth, available from the Department of the Environment and Heritage. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to: Assistant Secretary Natural Resource Management Policy Branch Department of the Environment and Heritage PO Box 787 CANBERRA ACT 2601 This publication is available on the Internet at: www.deh.gov.au/biodiversity/threatened/publications/tap/chytrid/ For additional hard copies, please contact the Department of the Environment and Heritage, Community Information Unit on 1800 803 772. Front cover photo: Litoria genimaculata (Green-eyed tree frog) Sequential page photo: Taudactylus eungellensis (Eungella day frog) Banner photo on chapter pages: Close up of the skin of Litoria genimaculata (Green-eyed tree frog) ii Foreword ‘Infection of amphibians with chytrid fungus resulting Under the EPBC Act the Australian Government in chytridiomycosis’ was listed in July 2002 as a key implements the plan in Commonwealth areas and seeks threatening process under the Environment Protection the cooperation of the states and territories where the and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). disease impacts within their jurisdictions.
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Witness Report
    Expert Witness Report Report prepared on instructions of: Bleyer Lawyers, Level 1, 550 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne, Vic 3000 Australia Prepared by: Graeme Gillespie B.Sc. Ph.D. 55 Union Street, Northcote, Vic 3070, Australia Curriculum Vitae Attached (Appendix I) I have read the Expert Witness Code of Conduct and agree to be bound by it. Graeme Gillespie 23 February 2010 Qualifications and Experience Please see my curriculum vitae (Appendix I) for my general qualifications and experience. My Ph.D. in zoology focussed specifically on the conservation biology and ecology of frog species in south-eastern Australia. I have 23 years of field and scientific experience studying amphibians and their conservation and management in south- eastern Australia. I have published 24 refereed scientific papers and 38 technical reports on amphibian ecology, conservation and management. I am recognised throughout Australia as an authority on the frog fauna of Victoria, specifically with respect to conservation issues, and I am regularly asked to provide advice on such matters to individuals, government conservation and land management agencies, and non-government organisations. With regard to the Giant Burrowing Frog, I encountered this species on several occasions between 1986 and 1992 while undertaking and supervising pre-logging biodiversity surveys in East Gippsland, Victoria. These records are documented in the Victorian Wildlife Atlas. During this period, I gained knowledge of the species’ habitat associations, breeding biology, some aspects of its behaviour and an appreciation of its conservation status in Victoria (see Opie et al. 1990; Westaway et al.1990; Lobert et al. 1991). Because of my research into amphibian conservation and management, I am highly familiar with the existing literature on the impact of various forest management activities on amphibians and the implications of these activities for amphibian conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Ecology of the Giant Burrowing Frog (Heleioporus Australiacus): Implications for Conservation Prescriptions
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health January 2008 Spatial ecology of the giant burrowing frog (Heleioporus australiacus): implications for conservation prescriptions Trent D. Penman University of Wollongong, [email protected] F Lemckert M J Mahony Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/scipapers Part of the Life Sciences Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Penman, Trent D.; Lemckert, F; and Mahony, M J: Spatial ecology of the giant burrowing frog (Heleioporus australiacus): implications for conservation prescriptions 2008, 179-186. https://ro.uow.edu.au/scipapers/724 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Spatial ecology of the giant burrowing frog (Heleioporus australiacus): implications for conservation prescriptions Abstract Management of threatened anurans requires an understanding of a species’ behaviour and habitat requirements in both the breeding and non-breeding environments. The giant burrowing frog (Heleioporus australiacus) is a threatened species in south-eastern Australia. Little is known about its habitat requirements, creating difficulties in vde eloping management strategies for the species.Weradio-tracked 33 individual H. australiacus in order to determine their habitat use and behaviour. Data from 33 frogs followed for between 5 and 599 days show that individuals spend little time near (<15 >m) their breeding sites (mean 4.7 days for males and 6.3 days for females annually). Most time is spent in distinct non- breeding activity areas 20–250m from the breeding sites.
    [Show full text]
  • National Recovery Plan for the Stuttering Frog Mixophyes Balbus
    National Recovery Plan for the Stuttering Frog Mixophyes balbus David Hunter and Graeme Gillespie Prepared by David Hunter and Graeme Gillespie (Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria). Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) Melbourne, October 2011. © State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2010 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne. ISBN 978-1-74242-369-2 (online) This is a Recovery Plan prepared under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, with the assistance of funding provided by the Australian Government. This Recovery Plan has been developed with the involvement and cooperation of a range of stakeholders, but individual stakeholders have not necessarily committed to undertaking specific actions. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds may be subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved. Proposed actions may be subject to modification over the life of the plan due to changes in knowledge. Disclaimer: This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. An electronic version of this document is available on the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts website www.environment.gov.au For more information contact the DSE Customer Service Centre 136 186 Citation: Hunter, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Inspiring Speech (57Kb Pdf File)
    Full Day Hansard Transcript (Legislative Assembly, 27 February 1992, Corrected Copy) Printing Tips | Print selected text LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY Thursday, 27th February, 1992 ______ Mr Speaker (The Hon. Kevin Richard Rozzoli) took the chair at 9 a.m. Mr Speaker offered the Prayer. GARIGAL NATIONAL PARK (EXTENSION) BILL Bill introduced and read a first time. Second Reading Dr METHERELL (Davidson) [9.0]: I move: That this bill be now read a second time. The eyes of history are upon this House. It is time for a new vision that embraces both environmental protection and opportunities for sustainable development for the future. This is a particularly historic opportunity for this House to complete a task that the first Australian settlers commenced more than 200 years ago when they set aside Sydney's foreshores. Recently, areas such as Kuring-Gai Chase were set aside. We have an opportunity to recognise that dream in the minds of our ancestors and to complete it by linking the Hawkesbury River in the north with Sydney Harbour in the south to form a network of national parks for future generations. I refer to our history because, no matter what our position is in the spectrum of views on environmental protection, all of us acknowledge the magnificent legacy of areas such as the Kuring-Gai Chase National Park and the Royal National Park. They and so many of the other national parks around this State and nation were left to this generation and for future generations by people who had the vision to set aside lands of natural grandeur and lands that protected our endangered flora and fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • 2219573-REP-Marine Assessment Report AR
    Appendix L – Marine Assessment GHD | Report for Hunter Water Corporation - Belmont Drought Response Desalination Plant, 2219573 Hunter Water Corporation Belmont Drought Response Desalination Plant Marine Environment Assessment Amendment Report July 2020 Table of contents 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and structure of this report .................................................................................... 2 2. Project changes ............................................................................................................................. 4 2.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................. 4 2.2 Key features of the amended Project .................................................................................. 4 3. Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 7 3.1 Review of relevant legislation .............................................................................................. 7 3.2 Review of databases and searches ..................................................................................... 7 3.3 Review of previous marine ecology reports ........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Two Hundred and Ten Years Looking for the Giant Burrowing Frog
    Two hundred and ten years looking for the Giant Burrowing Frog 1 2 Trent Penman , Francis Lemckert and Michael Mahony' 'School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, N.S.W 2308,Australia 2Biodiversity Systems, Research and Development Division, Forests NSW P.O Box I 00 Beecroft, N.S.W 2119 Australia. Email for corresponding author: [email protected] The giant burrowing frog Heleioporusaustraliacus (Shaw) is a large, morphologically distinctive, but Downloaded fromhttp://meridian.allenpress.com/australian-zoologist/article-pdf/32/4/597/1471522/az_2004_005.pdf by gueston26September2021 cryptic frog found in south eastern Australia. This paper reviews the literature pertaining to the Giant Burrowing Frog. It is a forest dependent species found on the coast and adjacent ranges of south-eastern Australia, with five congeners in south-west Western Australia. The species is listed as vulnerable in NSW and Victoria and under Commonwealth legislation, although there is no obvious cause for a decline nor is it clear how much decline has occurred. Proposed threats to the species survival include forestry operations, habitat destruction, introduced species, pollutants, increased UV and disease.A large gap exists in the species distributional records and H. australiacusmay represent two distinct species, although the evidence for this remains inconclusive. Standard detection methods for frogs do not apply well to the Giant Burrowing Frog and alternative methods are required to provide a more detailed understanding of its ecology and distribution. Key words: review, conservation, Heleioporus, management, amphibian Introduction Despite being one of the first frogs described from The review brings together all known records from various Australia, there has been very little research into museum specimens, the published literature and previous the ecology of the Giant Burrowing Frog Heleioporus collations of habitat requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Proposal
    PLANNING PROPOSAL Amendments to Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2011 MANLY CREEK NATIVE VEGETATION (in the vicinity of “Mermaid Pool”, Manly Vale) April 2019 (v.2 Incorporating DPE Feedback pre Gateway Determination) TRIM PEX2018/0008 RN2019/226665 Page 1 of 44 Contents Part 1 – Intended Outcomes .................................................................................................................... 3 Part 2 – Explanation of Provisions ......................................................................................................... 4 Part 3 – Justification .............................................................................................................................. 11 Part 4 – Maps .......................................................................................................................................... 37 Part 5 – Community Consultation......................................................................................................... 43 Part 6 – Project Timeline ........................................................................................................................ 44 Page 2 of 44 Part 1 – Intended Outcomes The intended outcome of the Planning Proposal is to rezone certain Crown Land parcels of native vegetation including riparian corridor lands of Manly Creek, downstream of Manly Dam, Manly Vale from Low Density Residential R2 to Public Recreation RE1 to provide for a range of recreational settings, activities and land uses that are compatible with the values
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Burrowing Frog-(Heleioporus
    #61 This Action Statement was first published in 1994 and remains current. This Giant Burrowing Frog version has been prepared for web publication. It Heleioporus australiacus retains the original text of the action statement, although contact information, the distribution map and the illustration may have been updated. © The State of Victoria, Department of Sustainability and Environment, 2003 Published by the Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria. Giant Burrowing Frog (Heleioporus australiacus) Distribution in Victoria (DSE 2002) 8 Nicholson Street, (Illustration by John Las Gourgues) East Melbourne, Victoria 3002 Australia Description and Distribution coastal slopes of the Great Dividing Range The Giant Burrowing Frog (Heleioporus below 1000 m altitude, between Gosford in This publication may be of New South Wales and Walhalla in central assistance to you but the australiacus Shaw & Nodder 1795) is a large, Gippsland. No records are known between State of Victoria and its robust species with a maximum body employees do not guarantee length of 100 mm. Body colour is chocolate Jervis Bay and Eden, indicating that the that the publication is brown above and white beneath with species may be composed of two disjunct without flaw of any kind or scattered yellow spots, usually capping populations. Gillespie (1990) gives a detailed is wholly appropriate for warts, on the flanks and around the cloaca. coverage of Victorian records since 1982. your particular purposes The back and sides are covered with small All Victorian records of the species have and therefore disclaims all warts each with a small black spine. The been from eucalypt forest of various types.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora and Fauna Assessment
    Figure 1 - Map of region showing the four selected survey sites. Figure 2 – Habitat areas within study area for Rosenberg’s Goanna Cygnet Surveys & Consultancy ABN 15925 463 459 2 Acron Road, Phone & fax: (02) 9449 4606 St Ives, NSW 2075 Mobile: 0413 042 355 Australia. Email: [email protected] 16th March 2017 To: Corey Mead, Travers bushfire & ecology, 38A The Avenue, Mt Penang Parklands, Central Coast Highway, Kariong, NSW 2250. Dear Corey, Belrose Planning proposal: Rosenberg’s Goanna assessment. In 2012 I carried out a survey of areas adjacent to the proposed subdivision on behalf of Travers bushfire & ecology to assess if the population of Rosenberg’s Goannas at the site would be significantly impacted. My conclusions at that time were that: The proposed residential site was not critical to the survival of the population. There is adequate habitat surrounding the proposed residential site to support a viable population. The proposal would not restrict movement or connectivity for the local population. There was no significant impact. Since that time you have advised me that following a recent bushfire review there are increased impacts from APZ’s resulting in an additional loss of .82ha of the important habitat area. Having had an opportunity to inspect the addition to the APZ with you this morning, I am of the opinion that this does not change my original assessment and conclusions. Regards, Gerry Swan, Principal Cygnet Surveys & Consultancy. Threatened Frog Specialist Report A6 Appendix 6 - Giant Burrowing Frog and Red
    [Show full text]