Genes-496949 Resubmission Without Tracked
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Diversity of “Ca. Micrarchaeota” in two distinct types of acidic ANGOR UNIVERSITY environments and their associations with Thermoplasmatales Golyshina, Olga; Bargiela, Rafael; Toshchakov, Stepan V.; Chernyh, Nikolay A.; Ramayah, Soshila; Korzhenkov, Aleksei A.; Kublanov, Ilya V.; Golyshin, Peter Genes DOI: 10.3390/genes10060461 PRIFYSGOL BANGOR / B Published: 15/06/2019 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Cyswllt i'r cyhoeddiad / Link to publication Dyfyniad o'r fersiwn a gyhoeddwyd / Citation for published version (APA): Golyshina, O., Bargiela, R., Toshchakov, S. V., Chernyh, N. A., Ramayah, S., Korzhenkov, A. A., Kublanov, I. V., & Golyshin, P. (2019). Diversity of “Ca. Micrarchaeota” in two distinct types of acidic environments and their associations with Thermoplasmatales. Genes, 10(6), [461]. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10060461 Hawliau Cyffredinol / General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. 25. Sep. 2021 1 Article 2 Diversity of “Ca. Micrarchaeota” in two distinct 3 types of acidic environments and their associations 4 with Thermoplasmatales 5 Olga V. Golyshina 1,2 #, Rafael Bargiela 1,2, Stepan V. Toshchakov 3, Nikolay A. Chernyh 3, Soshila 6 Ramayah1,2, Aleksei A. Korzhenkov 4 , Ilya V. Kublanov 3 and Peter N. Golyshin 1,2 7 1School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Deiniol Rd, Bangor, LL57 2UW, UK, [email protected]; 8 [email protected]; [email protected] 9 2Centre for Environmental Biotechnology, Bangor University, Deiniol Rd, Bangor, LL57 2UW, UK 10 3Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center for Biotechnology, Russian Academy of Sciences, 11 Prospect 60-Letiya Oktyabrya 7/2, Moscow, 117312, Russia, [email protected]; 12 [email protected]; [email protected] 13 4National Research Center "Kurchatov Institute", Akademika Kurchatova sq., 1, Moscow, 123182, Russia, 14 [email protected]; 15 Correspondence: Tel.: +44 1248 388607; Fax: +44 1248 382569; [email protected] 16 17 Abstract: “Candidatus Micrarchaeota” are widely distributed in acidic environments, however, their 18 cultivability and our understanding of their interactions with potential hosts are very limited. Their 19 habitats were so far attributed with acidic sites, soils, peats, freshwater systems and hypersaline 20 mats. Using cultivation and culture-independent approaches (16S rRNA gene clonal libraries, high- 21 throughput amplicon sequencing of V3-V4 region of 16S rRNA genes) we surveyed the occurrence 22 of these archaea in geothermal areas on Kamchatka Peninsula and Kunashir Island and assessed 23 their taxonomic diversity in relation with another type of low-pH environment, acid mine drainage 24 stream (Wales, UK). We detected “Ca. Micrarchaeota” in thermophilic heterotrophic enrichment 25 cultures of Kunashir and Kamchatka that appeared as two different phylotypes, namely “Ca. 26 Mancarchaeum acidiphilum”-, and ARMAN-2-related, alongside their potential hosts, 27 Cuniculiplasma spp. and other Thermoplasmatales archaea without defined taxonomic position. These 28 clusters of “Ca. Micrarchaeota” together with three other groups were also present in mesophilic 29 acid mine drainage community. Present work expands our knowledge on the diversity of “Ca. 30 Micrarchaeota” in thermophilic and mesophilic acidic environments, suggests cultivability patterns 31 of acidophilic archaea and establishes potential links between low-abundance species of 32 thermophilic “Ca. Micrarchaeota” and certain Thermoplasmatales, such as Cuniculiplasma spp. in situ. 33 Keywords: “Ca. Mancarchaeum acidiphilum”; ARMAN-2; “Ca. Micrarchaeota”; DPANN 34 superphylum; Thermoplasmatales; Cuniculiplasma; Acidic environments; Acid Mine Drainage sites; 35 Terrestrial hot springs 36 37 1. Introduction 38 Archaeal lineages represented in relatively low abundance in communities are still largely 39 underexplored, which leaves many gaps in our knowledge regarding their distribution patterns, 40 specific roles in the environment and interconnection with other community members. One example 41 of these organisms, often referred to as microbial “dark matter”, is a group of Archaeal Richmond 42 Mine Acidophilic Nanoorganisms (ARMAN), firstly detected in acid mine drainage systems of Iron 43 Mountain (CA, USA) and later confirmed to be widely distributed in numerous low pH settings as 44 well as in areas with neutral pH values 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8. Two names for candidate phyla were proposed Genes 2019, 10, x; doi: FOR PEER REVIEW www.mdpi.com/journal/genes Genes 2019, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 13 45 for these lineages with significantly reduced genome sizes, namely “Ca. Micrarchaeota” and “Ca. 46 Parvarchaeota” 1. 47 Based on the phylogenetic analysis of three concatenated protein sets these groups are placed 48 divergently 9. “Ca. Micrarchaeota” were shown to cluster with “Ca. Diapherotrites” and “Ca. 49 Parvarchaeota” to be associated with Nanoarchaeota 9. Both groups are included into a tentative 50 DPANN supercluster, incorporating also Nanoarchaeota and Candidate phyla “Aenigmarchaeota”, 51 “Altiarchaeota”, “Diapherotrites”, “Huberarchaeota”, “Nanohaloarchaeota”, “Pacearchaeota”, and 52 “Woesearchaeota” 10, 11. This group comprises organisms with reduced genome sizes and limited 53 metabolic potential, small dimensions of cells and reliance on symbiotic/mutualistic/commensalism- 54 based interactions with other species for some of these archaea 10. However, cultivated DPANN 55 members were only recorded for Nanoarchaeota and “Ca. Micrarchaeota”. Cultured thermophilic 56 associations between Nanoarchaeota and Crenarchaeota described and studied so far, are noteworthy 57 to mention. The very first example of a co-culture was Nanoarchaeum equitans and Ignicoccus hospitalis 58 12, followed by an association between Nanoobsidianus stetteri and Sulfolobales Acd1 13 a “Candidatus 59 Nanopusillus acidilobi” and Acidilobus sp. 7a 14 and finally by a stable co-culture of “Candidatus 60 Nanoclepta minutus” and Zestosphaera tikiterensis (representing a new member of the family 61 Desulfurococacceae) 15. For mesophilic and extremely acidophilic “Ca. Micrarchaeota” two cultured 62 associations were documented: “Ca. Mancarchaeum acidiphilum” Mia14 with Cuniculuplasma 63 divulgatum PM4 6 and “Ca. Micrarchaeota”, ARMAN-1-related organism in a co-culture with 64 consortium of two archaea (Cuniculiplasma divulgatum-like and another archaeon of the order 65 Thermoplasmatales) together with a fungus16. Nevertheless, the distribution of “Ca. Micrarchaeota” in 66 metagenomic data occurs at a global scale 8. 67 Estimation of phylogenetic diversity for “Ca. Micrarchaeota” 8 based on 16S rRNA gene sequence 68 identity cut-offs for genus (94.5 %) and family (86.5%) proposed by Yarza et al.17 suggested clustering 69 into 12 genera and 2 families. Relative abundance of “Ca. Micrarchaeota” in environmental 70 microbiomes was shown to constitute <1% in 17 of 25 genomes reconstructed from metagenomic 71 data, although an abundance of one assembly variant represented by FK_Sed_bin12_4 (Fankou AMD 72 sediment, China) was as high as 5.3-21.3% in certain subsamples 8. Two acidophilic biofilm 73 communities of Iron Mountain (CA, USA) accounted for ~7% “Ca. Micrarchaeota”/ ARMAN-2 reads 74 2. It was reported 8 that “Ca. Micrarchaeota” in comparison to “Ca. Parvarchaeota” possess wider 75 distribution patterns since signatures of this group were detected not in acidic settings only but in 76 soils, peats, freshwater systems and hypersaline mats. It may imply that “Ca. Micrarchaeota” 77 demonstrate enhanced resistance to selective pressure, which enables their spreading and genome 78 stability. Altogether, connection with Thermoplasmatales was predicted for 16 “Ca. Micrarchaeota” and 79 for 13 “Ca. Parvarchaeota” species 8. 80 Analysis of 39 ARMAN-related genomes with different levels of completeness from various 81 emplacements pointed at a certain variability in genome sizes (0.64-1.08 Mb) and predicted their 82 potential involvement in carbon, nitrogen and iron cycles 8. Furthermore, genomic analysis suggested 83 microaerophilic and anaerobic lifestyles for “Ca. Micrarchaeota”, based on aerobic respiratory chain, 84 fermentation potential and presence of cytochrome bd-II encoding genes 8. However, experimental 85 confirmations of certain predicted physiological traits are still due 6, 8, 16. 86 To understand further patterns of distribution and phylogenetic variance of these archaea in 87 particular environments, we focused our study on two types of acidic environments. 88 We surveyed the presence of “Ca. Micrarchaeota” -related sequences in acidic geothermal areas 89 via establishment of enrichment cultures with samples from terrestrial hydrothermal vents of 90 Kamchatka Peninsula and Kunashir Islands