DOCSLIB.ORG

Loxahatchee River Estuary Overall Species List

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Loxahatchee River Estuary Overall Species List Loxahatchee River Estuary Overall Species List Taxa Genus species Taxa Genus species AMPHIPODA Acuminodeutopus naglei CUMACEA Cyclaspsis varians AMPHIPODA Ampelisca abdita CUMACEA Cumacea sp. AMPHIPODA Ampelisca vadorum CUMACEA Oxyurostylus cf. smithi AMPHIPODA Amphipoda unid. DECOPODA Alphaeus normanni AMPHIPODA Aoridae unid. DECOPODA Alpheidae unid. AMPHIPODA Bathyporeia parkeri DECOPODA Alpheus sp. AMPHIPODA Caprellidae sp. DECOPODA Brachyura unid. AMPHIPODA Cerapus cf. benthophilus DECOPODA Calappa angusta AMPHIPODA Cerapus cf. tubularis DECOPODA Callianassa sp. AMPHIPODA Cerapus sp. DECOPODA Callinassa jamaicense AMPHIPODA Corophium acutum DECOPODA Callinectes sapidus AMPHIPODA Corophium lacustre DECOPODA Callinectes sp. AMPHIPODA Corophium sp. A DECOPODA Clibanaris sp. AMPHIPODA Corophium sp. DECOPODA Clibinarius vittatus AMPHIPODA Corophium cf. tuberculatum DECOPODA Decapoda unid. AMPHIPODA Corophiidae unid. DECOPODA Decapoda unid. meg. (Milligan) AMPHIPODA Cymadusa compta DECOPODA Decapoda unid. zoe. (Milligan) AMPHIPODA Erichthonius brasiliensis DECOPODA Dendrobranchiata sp. AMPHIPODA Erichthonius rubricornis DECOPODA Diogenidae unid. AMPHIPODA Eudevanopus honduranus DECOPODA Emerita talpoida AMPHIPODA Gammaridae unid. DECOPODA Hippolyte sp. AMPHIPODA Gammarus mucronatus DECOPODA Hippolyte zostericola AMPHIPODA Grandidierella bonnieroides DECOPODA Macrobrachium sp. AMPHIPODA Hyallela azteca DECOPODA Majidae unid. AMPHIPODA Lembos smithi DECOPODA Ogyrides alphaerostris AMPHIPODA Listriella barnardi DECOPODA Paguridae unid. AMPHIPODA Lysianopsis alba DECOPODA Paguristes sp. AMPHIPODA Melita nitida DECOPODA Pagurus longicarpus . AMPHIPODA Monoculodes nyei DECOPODA Pagurus sp. AMPHIPODA Parhyale hawaiensis DECOPODA Palaemonetes sp. AMPHIPODA Photis cf. reinhardi DECOPODA Palaemonidae unid. AMPHIPODA Pontogeneia inermis DECOPODA Panopeus herbstii AMPHIPODA Rudilomboides naglei DECOPODA Penaeidae unid. AMPHIPODA Stegocephalidae sp. A (Milligan) DECOPODA Penaeus sp. AMPHIPODA Stenothoidae sp. A (Milligan) DECOPODA Periclimenes americanus ANTHOZOA Actiniaria unid. DECOPODA Pinnixa cf. floridana ANTHOZOA Anthenaria sp. DECOPODA Pinnixa chaetopterana ANTHOZOA Anthozoa unid. DECOPODA Pinnixa sp. ANTHOZOA Anthomedusa sp. DECOPODA Pinnotheridae sp. ANTHOZOA Thenaria sp. DECOPODA Portunidae unid. BRYOZOA Bryozoa unid. DECOPODA Rhithropanopeus harrisii CHAETOGNATHA Chaetognatha unid. DECOPODA Tozeuma carolinense CHAETOGNATHA Syngnathus sp. DECOPODA Tozeuma sp. CHORDATA Amphioxus DECOPODA Xanthidae unid. CHORDATA Enteropneusta sp. DIPTERA Ablabesmyia mallochi CIRRIPEDA Balanus eburneus DIPTERA Chironomus sp. CIRRIPEDA Balanus sp. DIPTERA Cladotanytarsus sp. CUMACEA Almyracuma cf. Proximoculi DIPTERA Cryptochironomus sp. CUMACEA Almyracuma nr. Proximoculi DIPTERA Cryptotendipes sp. CUMACEA Almyracuma sp. DIPTERA Polypedilum tritum DIPTERA Polypedilum halterale NEMERTINEA Nemertea sp. E (Milligan) DIPTERA Stenochironomus sp. NEMERTINEA Nemertea unid. Loxahatchee River Estuary Overall Species List DIPTERA Thienemanniella sp. NEMERTINEA Rhynchocoela sp. DIPTERA Tribelos fuscicorne NEMERTINEA Nemertea sp. B (Milligan) ECHINODERMATA Amphiuridae unid. NEMERTINEA Nemertea sp. D (Milligan) ECHINODERMATA Holothuroidea unid. OLIGOCHAETA Dero Trifida ECHINODERMATA Ophiuroidea sp. OLIGOCHAETA Enchytraeidae unid. GASTROPODA Acteocina caniculata OLIGOCHAETA Grania monospermatotheca GASTROPODA Anachis translirata OLIGOCHAETA Grania sp. GASTROPODA Bulla striata OLIGOCHAETA Limnodriloides baculatus GASTROPODA Caecum nitidum OLIGOCHAETA Limnodriloides barnardi GASTROPODA Caecum pulchellum OLIGOCHAETA Limnodriloides hastatus GASTROPODA Caecum sp. OLIGOCHAETA Limnodriloides monothecus GASTROPODA Cerithium cf. floridanum OLIGOCHAETA Limnodriloides rubicundis GASTROPODA Cerithium leutosum OLIGOCHAETA Limnodriloides sp. GASTROPODA Crepidula maculosa OLIGOCHAETA Limnodriloidinae unid. GASTROPODA Crepidula plana OLIGOCHAETA Monopylephorus parvus GASTROPODA Crepidula sp. OLIGOCHAETA Monopylephorus rubroniveus GASTROPODA Gastropoda unid. OLIGOCHAETA Oligochaete unid. GASTROPODA Gastropoda unid. Sp. A(JAA) OLIGOCHAETA Paranais litoralis GASTROPODA Haminoea succinea OLIGOCHAETA Smithsonidrilus hummelincki GASTROPODA Menetus dilatatus OLIGOCHAETA Tectidrilus gabriellae GASTROPODA Mitrella lunata OLIGOCHAETA Tectidrilus sp. GASTROPODA Nassarius vibex OLIGOCHAETA Tectidrilus squalidus GASTROPODA Neritina virginea OLIGOCHAETA Thalassodrilodes sp. GASTROPODA Neritina reclivata OLIGOCHAETA Thalassodrilides gurwitschi GASTROPODA Neritina sp. OLIGOCHAETA Trieminentia corderoi GASTROPODA Neritina usnea OLIGOCHAETA Tubificidae sp. w/out hair GASTROPODA Nudibranchia sp. OLIGOCHAETA Tubificidae sp. A GASTROPODA Olivella sp. OLIGOCHAETA Tubificidae unid. GASTROPODA Opisthobranchia unid. OLIGOCHAETA Tubificoides brownae GASTROPODA Polynices sp. OLIGOCHAETA Tubificoides sp. GASTROPODA Turbonilla interrupta OLIGOCHAETA Tubificoides motei HIRUDINEA Myzobdella sp. PELECYPODA Amygdalum papyrium HIRUDINEA Myzobdella uruguayensis PELECYPODA Anomalocardia auberiana HYDROZOA Hydrobiidae sp. PELECYPODA Arcopsis adamsi HYDROZOA Hydrozoa unid. PELECYPODA Astarte cf. Nana ISOPODA Anthuridae unid. PELECYPODA Asthenothaerus hemphilli ISOPODA Cassidinidea ovalis PELECYPODA Bivalvia sp. ISOPODA Cyathura polita PELECYPODA Bivalvia unid. ISOPODA Edotea cf. montosa PELECYPODA Bushia elegans ISOPODA Edotea trilobata PELECYPODA Cf. Gouldii cerina ISOPODA Erichsonella attenuata PELECYPODA Chione cancellata ISOPODA Munna reynoldsi PELECYPODA Corbula contracta ISOPODA Paracerceis caudata PELECYPODA Crassostrea virginica ISOPODA Xenanthura brevitelson PELECYPODA Geukensia dimissa MYSIDACEA Bowmaniella floridana PELECYPODA Gouldii cf. cerina MYSIDACEA Bowmaniella sp. PELECYPODA Lima pellicida MYSIDACEA Mysidopsis almyra PELECYPODA Lucina pectinata MYSIDACEA Mysidopsis bahia PELECYPODA Lucina sp. MYSIDACEA Mysidopsis furca PELECYPODA Lyonsia hyalina floridana NEMATODA Nematomorpha unid. PELECYPODA Macoma sp. NEMERTINEA Nemertea sp. A (Milligan) PELECYPODA Macominae unid. PELECYPODA Mulinia lateralis POLYCHAETA Cirriformia sp. PELECYPODA Mytilopsis leucophaete POLYCHAETA Cirratulidae unid. PELECYPODA Parvilucina multilineata POLYCHAETA Cirriformia sp. A (Milligan) PELECYPODA Pitar albidus POLYCHAETA Cirriformia sp. B (Milligan) Loxahatchee River Estuary Overall Species List PELECYPODA Polymesoda caroliniana POLYCHAETA Cirrophorus sp. PELECYPODA Rangia cuneata POLYCHAETA Cossura delta PELECYPODA Solemya occidentalis POLYCHAETA Diopatra cuprea PELECYPODA Solemya velum POLYCHAETA Dorvillea sociabilis PELECYPODA Tagelus divisus POLYCHAETA Dorvilleidae sp. PELECYPODA Tagelus plebius POLYCHAETA Drilonereis sp. E (Milligan) PELECYPODA Tellina sp. POLYCHAETA Ehlersia cornuta PELECYPODA Tellina nr. Mera POLYCHAETA Enchytraeidae unid. PELECYPODA Tellina versicolor POLYCHAETA Enoplobranchus sanguineus PELECYPODA Tellinidae unid. POLYCHAETA Eteone heteropoda PHORONIDA Phoronis architecta POLYCHAETA Eteone lactae PHORONIDA Phoronis sp. POLYCHAETA Eteone sp. PLATYHELMINTHES Stylochus sp. POLYCHAETA Eunice sp. PLATYHELMINTHES Turbellaria unid. POLYCHAETA Eurythoe complanata POLYCHAETA Ancistrosyllis carolinensis POLYCHAETA Eurythoe sp. B (Milligan) POLYCHAETA Arabella mutans POLYCHAETA Exogone dispar POLYCHAETA Arenicola cristata POLYCHAETA Fabricia sp. POLYCHAETA Aricidea fragilis POLYCHAETA Fabriciola trilobata POLYCHAETA Aricidea philbinae POLYCHAETA Fabricinuda trilobata POLYCHAETA Aricidea sp. A (Milligan) POLYCHAETA Glycera abranchiata POLYCHAETA Aricidea sp. C POLYCHAETA Glycera dibranchiata POLYCHAETA Aricidea sp. POLYCHAETA Glycera capitata POLYCHAETA Aricidea cf. suecica POLYCHAETA Glycera sp. POLYCHAETA Aricidea taylori POLYCHAETA Glyceridae unid. POLYCHAETA Armandia agilis POLYCHAETA Glycinde solitaria POLYCHAETA Armandia maculata POLYCHAETA Glycinde socialis POLYCHAETA Armandia sp. POLYCHAETA Glycinde sp. POLYCHAETA Asychis elongatus POLYCHAETA Grubeosyllis clavata POLYCHAETA Axiothella mucosa POLYCHAETA Gyptis brevipalpa POLYCHAETA Bhawania goodie POLYCHAETA Haplosyllis spongicola POLYCHAETA Bhawania heteroseta POLYCHAETA Haploscoloplos fragilis POLYCHAETA Boguea enigmatica POLYCHAETA Heteromastus filiformis POLYCHAETA Brainia sp. POLYCHAETA Hobsonia florida POLYCHAETA Braina wellfleetensis POLYCHAETA Hypereteone heteropoda POLYCHAETA Brainia clavata POLYCHAETA Kinbergonuphis simoni POLYCHAETA Branchiomma sp. POLYCHAETA Laeonereis culveri POLYCHAETA Capitella capitata POLYCHAETA Laonome sp. POLYCHAETA Capitellidae unid. POLYCHAETA Leitoscoloplos foliosus POLYCHAETA Capitellides jonesi POLYCHAETA Leitoscoloplos fragilis POLYCHAETA Capitomastus jonesi POLYCHAETA Leitoscoloplos robustus POLYCHAETA Capitomastus sp. A (Milligan) POLYCHAETA Leitoscoloplos sp. POLYCHAETA Caraziella hobsonae POLYCHAETA Lepidometria sp. POLYCHAETA Caulleriella alata POLYCHAETA Loimia medusa POLYCHAETA Caulleriella killariensis POLYCHAETA Lumbrineridae unid. POLYCHAETA Caulleriella sp. A (Milligan) POLYCHAETA Lumbrineris sp. POLYCHAETA Caulleriella sp. POLYCHAETA Lumbrineris verrilli POLYCHAETA Ceratonereis mirabilis POLYCHAETA Malacoceros vanderhorsti POLYCHAETA Chone cf americana POLYCHAETA Maldanidae sp. POLYCHAETA Chone sp. POLYCHAETA Mediomastus ambiseta POLYCHAETA Mediomastus californiensis POLYCHAETA Sabella cf. melanostigma POLYCHAETA Mediomastus sp. POLYCHAETA Sabellaria floridensis POLYCHAETA Megalomma pigmentum POLYCHAETA Sabellidae unid. POLYCHAETA Megalomma sp. A (Milligan) POLYCHAETA Scolelepis sp. POLYCHAETA
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Benthic Invertebrate Community Monitoring and Indicator Development for Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary
    July 15, 2013 Final Report Project SR12-002: Benthic Invertebrate Community Monitoring and Indicator Development for Barnegat Bay-Little Egg Harbor Estuary Gary L. Taghon, Rutgers University, Project Manager [email protected] Judith P. Grassle, Rutgers University, Co-Manager [email protected] Charlotte M. Fuller, Rutgers University, Co-Manager [email protected] Rosemarie F. Petrecca, Rutgers University, Co-Manager and Quality Assurance Officer [email protected] Patricia Ramey, Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museum, Frankfurt Germany, Co-Manager [email protected] Thomas Belton, NJDEP Project Manager and NJDEP Research Coordinator [email protected] Marc Ferko, NJDEP Quality Assurance Officer [email protected] Bob Schuster, NJDEP Bureau of Marine Water Monitoring [email protected] Introduction The Barnegat Bay ecosystem is potentially under stress from human impacts, which have increased over the past several decades. Benthic macroinvertebrates are commonly included in studies to monitor the effects of human and natural stresses on marine and estuarine ecosystems. There are several reasons for this. Macroinvertebrates (here defined as animals retained on a 0.5-mm mesh sieve) are abundant in most coastal and estuarine sediments, typically on the order of 103 to 104 per meter squared. Benthic communities are typically composed of many taxa from different phyla, and quantitative measures of community diversity (e.g., Rosenberg et al. 2004) and the relative abundance of animals with different feeding behaviors (e.g., Weisberg et al. 1997, Pelletier et al. 2010), can be used to evaluate ecosystem health. Because most benthic invertebrates are sedentary as adults, they function as integrators, over periods of months to years, of the properties of their environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, and "Aschelminthes" - A
    BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol. III - Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, and "Aschelminthes" - A. Schmidt-Rhaesa PLATYHELMINTHES, NEMERTEA, AND “ASCHELMINTHES” A. Schmidt-Rhaesa University of Bielefeld, Germany Keywords: Platyhelminthes, Nemertea, Gnathifera, Gnathostomulida, Micrognathozoa, Rotifera, Acanthocephala, Cycliophora, Nemathelminthes, Gastrotricha, Nematoda, Nematomorpha, Priapulida, Kinorhyncha, Loricifera Contents 1. Introduction 2. General Morphology 3. Platyhelminthes, the Flatworms 4. Nemertea (Nemertini), the Ribbon Worms 5. “Aschelminthes” 5.1. Gnathifera 5.1.1. Gnathostomulida 5.1.2. Micrognathozoa (Limnognathia maerski) 5.1.3. Rotifera 5.1.4. Acanthocephala 5.1.5. Cycliophora (Symbion pandora) 5.2. Nemathelminthes 5.2.1. Gastrotricha 5.2.2. Nematoda, the Roundworms 5.2.3. Nematomorpha, the Horsehair Worms 5.2.4. Priapulida 5.2.5. Kinorhyncha 5.2.6. Loricifera Acknowledgements Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary UNESCO – EOLSS This chapter provides information on several basal bilaterian groups: flatworms, nemerteans, Gnathifera,SAMPLE and Nemathelminthes. CHAPTERS These include species-rich taxa such as Nematoda and Platyhelminthes, and as taxa with few or even only one species, such as Micrognathozoa (Limnognathia maerski) and Cycliophora (Symbion pandora). All Acanthocephala and subgroups of Platyhelminthes and Nematoda, are parasites that often exhibit complex life cycles. Most of the taxa described are marine, but some have also invaded freshwater or the terrestrial environment. “Aschelminthes” are not a natural group, instead, two taxa have been recognized that were earlier summarized under this name. Gnathifera include taxa with a conspicuous jaw apparatus such as Gnathostomulida, Micrognathozoa, and Rotifera. Although they do not possess a jaw apparatus, Acanthocephala also belong to Gnathifera due to their epidermal structure. ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) BIOLOGICAL SCIENCE FUNDAMENTALS AND SYSTEMATICS – Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Patterns of Diurnal Vertical Distribution and Dispersal
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons OEAS Theses and Dissertations Ocean, Earth & Atmospheric Sciences Spring 1986 Patterns of Diurnal Vertical Distribution and Dispersal- Recruitment Mechanisms of Decapod Crustacean Larvae and Postlarvae in the Chesapeake Bay, Virginia and Adjacent Offshore Waters Robert Copeland Maris Old Dominion University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/oeas_etds Part of the Oceanography Commons Recommended Citation Maris, Robert C.. "Patterns of Diurnal Vertical Distribution and Dispersal-Recruitment Mechanisms of Decapod Crustacean Larvae and Postlarvae in the Chesapeake Bay, Virginia and Adjacent Offshore Waters" (1986). Doctor of Philosophy (PhD), dissertation, Ocean/Earth/Atmos Sciences, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/h953-fj74 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/oeas_etds/142 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Ocean, Earth & Atmospheric Sciences at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in OEAS Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. PATTERNS OF DIURNAL VERTICAL DISTRIBUTION AND DISPERSAL-RECRUITMENT MECHANISMS OF DECAPOD CRUSTACEAN LARVAE AND POSTLARVAE IN THE CHESAPEAKE BAY, VIRGINIA AND ADJACENT OFFSHORE WATERS by Robert Copeland Maris B.S. December 1975, Texas ASM University M.S. May 1980, University of Southern Mississippi A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY OCEANOGRAPHY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY May, 1986 Approved by: ohn R. McConaugha (Dire«#or) Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. © Copyright by Robert Copeland Maris 1986 All Rights Reserved Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • A Radical Solution: the Phylogeny of the Nudibranch Family Fionidae
    RESEARCH ARTICLE A Radical Solution: The Phylogeny of the Nudibranch Family Fionidae Kristen Cella1, Leila Carmona2*, Irina Ekimova3,4, Anton Chichvarkhin3,5, Dimitry Schepetov6, Terrence M. Gosliner1 1 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California, United States of America, 2 Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, 3 Far Eastern Federal University, Vladivostok, Russia, 4 Biological Faculty, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, 5 A.V. Zhirmunsky Instutute of Marine Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences, Vladivostok, Russia, 6 National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia a11111 * [email protected] Abstract Tergipedidae represents a diverse and successful group of aeolid nudibranchs, with approx- imately 200 species distributed throughout most marine ecosystems and spanning all bio- OPEN ACCESS geographical regions of the oceans. However, the systematics of this family remains poorly Citation: Cella K, Carmona L, Ekimova I, understood since no modern phylogenetic study has been undertaken to support any of the Chichvarkhin A, Schepetov D, Gosliner TM (2016) A Radical Solution: The Phylogeny of the proposed classifications. The present study is the first molecular phylogeny of Tergipedidae Nudibranch Family Fionidae. PLoS ONE 11(12): based on partial sequences of two mitochondrial (COI and 16S) genes and one nuclear e0167800. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167800 gene (H3). Maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony and Bayesian analysis were con- Editor: Geerat J. Vermeij, University of California, ducted in order to elucidate the systematics of this family. Our results do not recover the tra- UNITED STATES ditional Tergipedidae as monophyletic, since it belongs to a larger clade that includes the Received: July 7, 2016 families Eubranchidae, Fionidae and Calmidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Jamaican Mangrove Areas
    BIODIVERSITY OF JAMAICAN MANGROVE AREAS Volume 7 Mangrove Biotypes VI: Common Fauna BY MONA WEBBER (PH.D) PROJECT FUNDED BY: 2 MANGROVE BIOTYPE VI: COMMON FAUNA CNIDARIA, ANNELIDA, CRUSTACEANS, MOLLUSCS & ECHINODERMS CONTENTS Page Introduction…………………………………………………………………… 4 List of fauna by habitat……………………………………………………….. 4 Cnidaria Aiptasia tagetes………………………………………………………… 6 Cassiopeia xamachana………………………………………………… 8 Annelida Sabellastarte magnifica………………………………………………… 10 Sabella sp………………………………………………………………. 11 Crustacea Calinectes exasperatus…………………………………………………. 12 Calinectes sapidus……………………………………………………… 13 Portunis sp……………………………………………………………… 13 Lupella forcepes………………………………………………………… 14 Persephone sp. …………………………………………………………. 15 Uca spp………………………………………………………………..... 16 Aratus pisoni……………………………………………………………. 17 Penaeus duorarum……………………………………………………… 18 Panulirus argus………………………………………………………… 19 Alphaeus sp…………………………………………………………….. 20 Mantis shrimp………………………………………………………….. 21 Balanus eberneus………………………………………………………. 22 Balanus amphitrite…………………………………………………….. 23 Chthamalus sp………………………………………………………….. 23 Mollusca Brachidontes exustus…………………………………………………… 24 Isognomon alatus………………………………………………………. 25 Crassostrea rhizophorae……………………………………………….. 26 Pinctada radiata………………………………………………………... 26 Plicatula gibosa………………………………………………………… 27 Martesia striata…………………………………………………………. 27 Perna viridis……………………………………………………………. 28 Trachycardium muricatum……………………………………..……… 30 Anadara chemnitzi………………………………………………...……. 30 Diplodonta punctata………………………………………………..…... 32 Dosinia sp…………………………………………………………..….
    [Show full text]
  • Nemertean Taxonomy—Implementing Changes in the Higher Ranks, Dismissing Anopla and Enopla
    Received: 27 August 2018 | Accepted: 28 August 2018 DOI: 10.1111/zsc.12317 LETTER TO THE EDITOR Nemertean taxonomy—Implementing changes in the higher ranks, dismissing Anopla and Enopla Dear Editor, José E. Alfaya3 Nemertean classification has closely followed Stiasny‐ Fernando Ángel Fernández‐Álvarez4 Wijnhoff’s scheme (1936) that was based on Schultze’s Håkan S Andersson5 (1851) division of the taxon into the two classes Anopla and Sonia C. S. Andrade6 Enopla. In August 2018, the 9th International Conference of Thomas Bartolomaeus7 Nemertean Biology took place in the Wadden Sea Station of Patrick Beckers7 the Alfred Wegener Institute in List auf Sylt, Germany. At Gregorio Bigatti3 this meeting, the community reached consensus to revise ne- Irina Cherneva8 mertean taxonomy at the class level, based on the compiled Alexey Chernyshev9,10 evidence from studies on nemertean systematics published Brian M. Chung11 in the last 15 years (Andrade et al., 2014, 2012 ; Thollesson Jörn von Döhren7 & Norenburg, 2003). Previous classifications (e.g., Stiasny‐ Gonzalo Giribet12 Wijnhoff, 1936) are not based on phylogenetic grounds, and Jaime Gonzalez‐Cueto13 the use of these names is therefore nowadays not wholly in- Alfonso Herrera‐Bachiller14 formative. With the purpose of facilitating the practical use Terra Hiebert15 of the nemertean taxonomy and also making nemertean tax- Natsumi Hookabe16 onomy reflect a wealth of more recent information, we con- Juan Junoy14 clude that the ranks Anopla and Enopla should be eliminated Hiroshi Kajihara16 with the following argumentation: “Enopla” has for long Daria Krämer7 held no more information than the name “Hoplonemertea”. Sebastian Kvist17,18 “Anopla” is paraphyletic and the name usually corresponds Timur Yu Magarlamov9 to the following traits: (a) not bearing stylet; and (b) mouth Svetlana Maslakova15 and proboscis having separate openings.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylum Nemertea)
    THE BIOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS OF A NEW SPECIES OF RIBBON WORM, GENUS TUBULANUS (PHYLUM NEMERTEA) By Rebecca Kirk Ritger Submitted to the Faculty of the College of Arts and Sciences of American University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science In Biology Chair: Dr. Qiristopher'Tudge m Dr.David C r. Jon L. Norenburg Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences JuK4£ __________ Date 2004 American University Washington, D.C. 20016 AMERICAN UNIVERSITY LIBRARY 1 1 0 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. UMI Number: 1421360 INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. ® UMI UMI Microform 1421360 Copyright 2004 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE BIOLOGY AND SYSTEMATICS OF A NEW SPECIES OF RIBBON WORM, GENUS TUBULANUS (PHYLUM NEMERTEA) By Rebecca Kirk Ritger ABSTRACT Most nemerteans are studied from poorly preserved museum specimens.
    [Show full text]
  • The Freshwater Snails (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of Mexico: Updated Checklist, Endemicity Hotspots, Threats and Conservation Status
    Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad Revista Mexicana de Biodiversidad 91 (2020): e912909 Taxonomy and systematics The freshwater snails (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of Mexico: updated checklist, endemicity hotspots, threats and conservation status Los caracoles dulceacuícolas (Mollusca: Gastropoda) de México: listado actualizado, hotspots de endemicidad, amenazas y estado de conservación Alexander Czaja a, *, Iris Gabriela Meza-Sánchez a, José Luis Estrada-Rodríguez a, Ulises Romero-Méndez a, Jorge Sáenz-Mata a, Verónica Ávila-Rodríguez a, Jorge Luis Becerra-López a, Josué Raymundo Estrada-Arellano a, Gabriel Fernando Cardoza-Martínez a, David Ramiro Aguillón-Gutiérrez a, Diana Gabriela Cordero-Torres a, Alan P. Covich b a Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Juárez del Estado de Durango, Av.Universidad s/n, Fraccionamiento Filadelfia, 35010 Gómez Palacio, Durango, Mexico b Institute of Ecology, Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, 140 East Green Street, Athens, GA 30602-2202, USA *Corresponding author: [email protected] (A. Czaja) Received: 14 April 2019; accepted: 6 November 2019 Abstract We present an updated checklist of native Mexican freshwater gastropods with data on their general distribution, hotspots of endemicity, threats, and for the first time, their estimated conservation status. The list contains 193 species, representing 13 families and 61 genera. Of these, 103 species (53.4%) and 12 genera are endemic to Mexico, and 75 species are considered local endemics because of their restricted distribution to very small areas. Using NatureServe Ranking, 9 species (4.7%) are considered possibly or presumably extinct, 40 (20.7%) are critically imperiled, 30 (15.5%) are imperiled, 15 (7.8%) are vulnerable and only 64 (33.2%) are currently stable.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Between Pea Crab (Pinnotheres Maculatus) Parasitism and Gonad Mass of the Bay Scallop (Argopecten Irradians)
    Gulf and Caribbean Research Volume 12 Issue 1 January 2000 Relationship Between Pea Crab (Pinnotheres maculatus) Parasitism and Gonad Mass of the Bay Scallop (Argopecten irradians) Paul A.X. Bologna Rutgers University Marine Field Station Kenneth L. Heck Jr. Dauphin Island Sea Lab Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Bologna, P. A. and K. L. Heck Jr. 2000. Relationship Between Pea Crab (Pinnotheres maculatus) Parasitism and Gonad Mass of the Bay Scallop (Argopecten irradians). Gulf and Caribbean Research 12 (1): 43-46. Retrieved from https://aquila.usm.edu/gcr/vol12/iss1/6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18785/gcr.1201.06 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf and Caribbean Research by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gulf and Caribbean Research Vol. 12, 43–46, 2000 Manuscript received June 30, 1999; accepted November 11, 1999 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PEA CRAB (PINNOTHERES MACULATUS) PARASITISM AND GONAD MASS OF THE BAY SCALLOP (ARGOPECTEN IRRADIANS) Paul A. X. Bologna1 and Kenneth L. Heck, Jr. 1Rutgers University Marine Field Station, 800 Great Bay Blvd., c/o 132 Great Bay Blvd., Tuckerton, NJ 08087, (609) 296-5260 x255, [email protected] University of South Alabama, Department of Marine Science, Dauphin Island Sea Lab, P.O. Box 369, Dauphin Island, AL 36528 ABSTRACT We investigated the prevalence of pea crabs (Pinnotheres maculatus) in bay scallops (Argopecten irradians) from 1994 through 1996 in a scallop population from St.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM VoL 109 WMhington : 1959 No. 3412 MARINE MOLLUSCA OF POINT BARROW, ALASKA Bv Nettie MacGinitie Introduction The material upon which this study is based was collected by G. E. MacGinitie in the vicinity of Point Barrow, Alaska. His work on the invertebrates of the region (see G. E. MacGinitie, 1955j was spon- sored by contracts (N6-0NR 243-16) between the OfRce of Naval Research and the California Institute of Technology (1948) and The Johns Hopkins L^niversity (1949-1950). The writer, who served as research associate under this project, spent the. periods from July 10 to Oct. 10, 1948, and from June 1949 to August 1950 at the Arctic Research Laboratory, which is located at Point Barrow base at ap- proximately long. 156°41' W. and lat. 71°20' N. As the northernmost point in Alaska, and representing as it does a point about midway between the waters of northwest Greenland and the Kara Sea, where collections of polar fauna have been made. Point Barrow should be of particular interest to students of Arctic forms. Although the dredge hauls made during the collection of these speci- mens number in the hundreds and, compared with most "expedition standards," would be called fairly intensive, the area of the ocean ' Kerckhofl Marine Laboratory, California Institute of Technology. 473771—59 1 59 — 60 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol. los bottom touched by the dredge is actually small in comparison with the total area involved in the investigation. Such dredge hauls can yield nothing comparable to what can be obtained from a mudflat at low tide, for instance.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Between Pea Crab (Pinnotheres Maculatus) Parasitism and Gonad Mass of the Bay Scallop (Argopecten Irradians) Paul A.X
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Aquila Digital Community Gulf and Caribbean Research Volume 12 | Issue 1 January 2000 Relationship Between Pea Crab (Pinnotheres maculatus) Parasitism and Gonad Mass of the Bay Scallop (Argopecten irradians) Paul A.X. Bologna Rutgers University Marine Field Station Kenneth L. Heck Jr. Dauphin Island Sea Lab DOI: 10.18785/gcr.1201.06 Follow this and additional works at: http://aquila.usm.edu/gcr Part of the Marine Biology Commons Recommended Citation Bologna, P. A. and K. L. Heck Jr. 2000. Relationship Between Pea Crab (Pinnotheres maculatus) Parasitism and Gonad Mass of the Bay Scallop (Argopecten irradians). Gulf and Caribbean Research 12 (1): 43-46. Retrieved from http://aquila.usm.edu/gcr/vol12/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Gulf and Caribbean Research by an authorized editor of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Gulf and Caribbean Research Vol. 12, 43–46, 2000 Manuscript received June 30, 1999; accepted November 11, 1999 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PEA CRAB (PINNOTHERES MACULATUS) PARASITISM AND GONAD MASS OF THE BAY SCALLOP (ARGOPECTEN IRRADIANS) Paul A. X. Bologna1 and Kenneth L. Heck, Jr. 1Rutgers University Marine Field Station, 800 Great Bay Blvd., c/o 132 Great Bay Blvd., Tuckerton, NJ 08087, (609) 296-5260 x255, [email protected] University of South Alabama, Department of Marine Science, Dauphin Island Sea Lab, P.O. Box 369, Dauphin Island, AL 36528 ABSTRACT We investigated the prevalence of pea crabs (Pinnotheres maculatus) in bay scallops (Argopecten irradians) from 1994 through 1996 in a scallop population from St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Larval Development of Elopment of Pinnixa
    The larval development of Pinnixa gracilipes Coelho (Decapoda, Pinnotheridae) reared in the laboratory Jô de F. Lima 1; Fernando Abrunhosa 1 & Petrônio A. Coelho 2 Núcleo de Estudos Costeiros, Universidade Federal do Pará. Campus de Bragança, Alameda Leandro Ribeiro, Aldeia, 68600-000 Bragança, Pará, Brasil. E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Departamento de Oceanografia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Avenida Arquitetura, Cidade Universitária, 50670-901 Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Pinnixa gracilipes Coelho, 1997 is a small pinnotherid crab living in association with ghost shrimp Lepidophthalmus siriboia Felder & Rodrigues, 1993 in the northeastern region of Pará State, Brazil. Larvae of P. gracilipes were reared in the laboratory from hatching to the megalopa stage. The complete zoeal period averaged 24 days. Mean duration for each larval stage was 5, 4, 4, 5 and 6 days, respectively. In the present study, five zoeal and megalopal stages are described and illustrated in detail. Morphological comparisons with previous reported works on Pinnotheridae larvae are briefly discussed. KEY WORDS. Larval description; pinnotherid crab. RESUMO. O desenvolvimento larval de Pinnixa gracilipes Coelho (Decapodapoda, Pinnotheridae) cultivado em laboratório. Pinnixa gracilipes Coelho, 1997 é um pequeno caranguejo pinoterídeo que vive em associação com Lepidophthalmus siriboia Felder & Rodrigues, 1993 no nordeste do Estado do Pará, Brasil. Larvas de P. gracilipes foram cultivadas em laboratório desde o nascimento ao estágio megalopa. O desenvolvimento completo durou cerca de 24 dias. O período médio de cada estágio foi 5, 4, 4, 5 e 6 dias, respectivamente. No presente trabalho, os cinco estágios zoeae e megalopa são descritos e ilustrados em detalhes.
    [Show full text]