DOCSLIB.ORG

Early Theatre Essay Prizes 2015

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Early Theatre Essay Prizes 2015 Early Theatre A Journal Associated with the Records of Early English Drama Editors Helen Ostovich (McMaster University) Melinda J. Gough (McMaster University) Associate Editors Erin E. Kelly (University of Victoria) Sarah E. Johnson (Royal Military College of Canada) Book Review Editor Peter Kirwan (University of Nottingham) Paleographer Patrick Gregory (REED) Editorial Board Gloria Betcher (Iowa State University) Pamela Allen Brown (University of Connecticut, Stamford) Richard Cave (Royal Holloway, University of London) Theresa Coletti (University of Maryland) John Craig (Simon Fraser University) JoAnna Dutka (University of Toronto) Garrett P.J. Epp (University of Alberta) Vanessa Harding (Birkbeck College, University of London) Alexandra Johnston (REED and University of Toronto) M.A. Katritzky (The Open University) Anne Lancashire (University of Toronto) Marion F. O’Connor (University of Kent) Jill Stevenson (Marymount Manhattan College) Suzanne Westfall (Lafayette College) Paul Yachnin (McGill University) This journal is a member of the Canadian Association of Learned Journals (CALJ) and the Council of Editors of Learned Journals . Subscription Information Early Theatre: A Journal Associated with the Records of Early English Drama (ET/ REED) is published twice a year in June and in December. Volumes in print for two years or more are now available through open access at http://earlytheatre. org. The complete journal is published online through ITER, where subscrib- ers also have access to the REED Newsletter from 1976 to 1997, when it ceased publication. We gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance provided by the Dean of Humanities and the department of English and Cultural Studies at McMaster University. Online Subscriptions Online access to Early Theatre is available via subscription through ITER: Gateway to the Middle Ages and Renaissance at http://www.itergateway .org/. Please contact Marian Cosic ([email protected]) for subscriptions and access. Print Subscriptions The print version of Early Theatre is available by subscription through Becker Associates. For subscriptions inquiries, please email journals@ beckerassociates .ca, call 416-538-1650, or fax 416-489-1713. To subscribe or renew online through our secure site, go to https://beckerassociates.ca/client/earlytheatre. Payments may be made by VISA, MASTERCARD, or AMEX, or by cheque or money order payable to Becker Associates. Subscriptions are due in advance of publi- cation. Current subscribers receive with the December issue an invoice for the following year. New subscribers should contact Becker Associates prior to the June issue if possible. Back Issues Requests for back volumes 2 to the current issue should be directed to Becker Associates as above. Please include your email address in all correspondence. ISSN 1206-9078 © Early Theatre Submissions Early Theatre welcomes research in medieval or early modern drama and the- atre history, rooted in the records and documents of England, Scotland, Ire- land, and Wales. We likewise encourage articles or notes on related materi- als either in Europe or in parts of the world where English or European travellers, traders, and colonizers observed performances by other peoples. Although we are primarily interested in the performance history of any art, entertainment, or festive occasion of the period, we also invite submissions of interpretive or literary discussions relating to the performances themselves. Contributions should be sent to our website http://earlytheatre.org. Manu- scripts of articles (preferably 6000–7500 words, although longer articles will be considered) and notes (300–5000 words) should be double-spaced throughout and conform to et/reed house style (see the Style Sheet on the Early Theatre website). Style guides for manuscript documents in early mod- ern English or Latin are also available online. If you quote from unpublished records or documents, you must supply photos or scans for checking by the REED paleographer. You must obtain permissions to publish for any illustrations, whether digital or photographic, that may be printed with an accepted article. All articles must be submitted electronically to the website as Word documents. We will not consider articles being simultaneously submitted elsewhere, nor will we print essays which are to appear in a book published within a year of scheduled publication by et/reed. Early Theatre uses double-blind peer review. We request that all authors remove identifying information from their manuscripts prior to submission. The website requires your email and postal addresses, abstract, and short biographical statement. All editorial correspondence should be addressed to the editors Helen Ostovich ([email protected]) and Melinda Gough ([email protected]). Contents Editorial 7 Announcement of essay prize-winners 9 Articles An Acoustical Approach to the Study of the Wagons of the York Mystery Plays: Structure and Orientation Mariana Lopez 11 ‘Here may we se a merveyl one’: Miracles and the Psalter in the N-Town ‘Marriage of Mary and Joseph’ Frank M. Napolitano 37 From Court to Playhouse and Back: Middleton’s Appropriation of the Masque Caroline Baird 57 ‘I will keep and character that name’: Dramatis Personae Lists in Early Modern Manuscript Plays Matteo Pangallo 87 Note ‘We have this day, expell’d our Men the Stage’: Dating the Prologue and Epilogue of The Parson’s Wedding Riki Miyoshi 119 Issues in Review Early Modern Women Theatre Makers Contributing Editor: Elizabeth Schafer 125 Introduction: Attending to Early Modern Women as Theatre Makers Elizabeth Schafer 125 Reproducing Iphigenia at Aulis Alison Findlay 133 Performing The Tragedy of Mariam and Constructing Stage History Ramona Wray 149 Daniel’s Cleopatra and Lady Anne Clifford: From a Jacobean Portrait to Modern Performance Yasmin Arshad, Helen Hackett, and Emma Whipday 167 A Performance Studies Approach to The Tragedy of Mariam Rebecca McCutcheon 187 Early Theatre 18.2 (2015), 7–10 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12745/et.18.2.2726 Editorial As we announced in our June issue, this Early Theatre issue is the last that will appear in print. From this point forward, we will be an online-only jour- nal. This occasion is a momentous one in terms of how far the journal has come in its eighteen years of history. Our first three years were difficult in production terms, working with the now-defunct McMaster University Press, but we gained a superb cover design out of the experience. The first issue (1998) began what became a yearly and now much anticipated event: the Issues in Review section, a ser- ies of short essays offering a close study of a particular trending topic. And we achieved our first special issue (2000), The York Cycle Then and Now (co-edited by Alexandra Johnston and Helen Ostovich), based on the 1998 performance and colloquium at the University of Toronto (Victoria). That special issue was reprinted to meet demand for classroom copies. For our fourth issue (2001), we moved to join forces with the Centre for Renaissance and Reformation Studies and, with the assistance of its then director William Bowen, won our first Social Sciences and Humanities Research Board of Canada grant to support the journal, under the proviso that we move to two issues a year. We had already added a book review editor for volume 4 (Karen Bamford) and an associate editor (Gloria Betcher), who oversaw the uploading of the digital archive for the reed Newsletter, Early Theatre’s predecessor, and for the gradual online life of Early Theatre on Iter, soon to be followed by other online distributors disseminating our work. We now have a desirable string of such distributors (called ‘aggregators’ in the business), including our latest partnerships for worldwide circulation: JSTOR and Project Muse. Since volume 5 (2002), we have printed Book Reviews in the June issue, and Issues in Review in the December issue. As our readers may remember, Gloria also edited volume 6 (2003) as a special issue in two parts entitled Performance, Politics, and Culture in the Southwest of Britain, 1350–1642. By volume 9 (2006), Roberta Barker had taken over the job of book review editor and continued this work up to volume 13 (2010), when Peter Kirwan accepted the position. Luckily, Roberta has continued to stay on as a board member. We also featured another important special issue guest-edited by Mary Polito and Amy Scott in 14.2 (2015), Circles and Circuits: Drama and 7 8 Politics in the Midlands, followed swiftly by Peter Parolin’s special issue in 15.1 (2012), Access and Contestation: Women’s Performance in Early Modern England, Italy, France, and Spain. We have been through many publisher changes over the years, but have felt most settled with the growing Toronto-based company Becker Associates. Thanks to Adam Becker, the physical quality of the print journal improved, alongside the impressive quality of content we’ve been able to maintain, as this issue (among many) demonstrates. We have notable new work in medieval drama streaming in, thanks perhaps to the energy of our new board members Theresa Coletti and Jill Stevenson. This final paper issue includes a study of the acoustics of pageant wagons in York by Mariana Lopez, and a critical reading of N-Town’s apocryphal ‘Mar- riage of Mary and Joseph’ by Frank Napolitano. Early modern drama con- tinues to be a strong focus of this journal: this issue includes an argument about Middleton’s incorporation of court masque into his plays for London’s commercial theatres by Caroline Baird, and a striking bibliographical history of the appearance of dramatis personae lists in manuscript plays by Matteo Pangallo. Riki Miyoshi’s note addresses the longstanding uncertainty about whether the prologue and epilogue of Killigrew’s The Parson’s Wedding origin- ated with the 1664 performance or emerged with the play’s staging in 1672. Our imminent shift to solely online publication and distribution, begin- ning with 2016’s volume 19, will allow us to continue the tradition of pro- ducing a high-quality journal while adding several features.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SCN 72 3&4 2014.Pdf (656.7Kb)
    EVENTEENTH- ENTURY EWS FALL - WINTER 2014 Vol. 72 Nos. 3&4 Including THE NEO-LATIN NEWS Vol. 62, Nos. 3&4 SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY NEWS VOLUME 72, Nos. 3&4 FALL-WINTER, 2014 An official organ of the Milton Society of America and of the Milton Section of the Modern Language Association, SCN is published as a double issue two times each year with the support of the English Department at Texas A&M University. SUBMISSIONS: As a scholarly review journal, SCN publishes only commissioned reviews. As a service to the scholarly community, SCN also publishes news items. A current style sheet, previous volumes’ Tables of Contents, and other informa- tion all may be obtained via at www.english.tamu.edu/scn/. Books for review and queries should be sent to: Prof. Donald R. Dickson English Department 4227 Texas A&M University College Station, Texas 77843-4227 E-Mail: [email protected] www.english.tamu.edu/scn/ and journals.tdl.org/scn ISSN 0037-3028 SEVENTEENTH-CENTURY NEWS EDITOR DONALD R. DICKSON Texas A&M University ASSOCIATE EDITORS Michele Marrapodi, University of Palermo Patricia Garcia, University of Texas E. Joe Johnson, Clayton State University EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Megan Pearson, Texas A&M University Morgan Wilson, Texas A&M University CONTENTS VOLUME 72, NOS. 3&4 ................................ FALL-WINTER, 2014 reviews Tom Cain and Ruth Connolly, eds., The Complete Poetry of Robert Herrick. Review by james mardock and eric rasmussen ........................... 190 Siobhán Collins, Bodies, Politics and Transformations: John Donne’s Metempsychosis. Review by anne lake prescott .......................... 195 Nabil Matar, Henry Stubbe’s The Rise and Progress of Mahometanism.
    [Show full text]
  • John Dryden and the Late 17Th Century Dramatic Experience Lecture 16 (C) by Asher Ashkar Gohar 1 Credit Hr
    JOHN DRYDEN AND THE LATE 17TH CENTURY DRAMATIC EXPERIENCE LECTURE 16 (C) BY ASHER ASHKAR GOHAR 1 CREDIT HR. JOHN DRYDEN (1631 – 1700) HIS LIFE: John Dryden was an English poet, literary critic, translator, and playwright who was made England's first Poet Laureate in 1668. He is seen as dominating the literary life of Restoration England to such a point that the period came to be known in literary circles as the “Age of Dryden”. The son of a country gentleman, Dryden grew up in the country. When he was 11 years old the Civil War broke out. Both his father’s and mother’s families sided with Parliament against the king, but Dryden’s own sympathies in his youth are unknown. About 1644 Dryden was admitted to Westminster School, where he received a predominantly classical education under the celebrated Richard Busby. His easy and lifelong familiarity with classical literature begun at Westminster later resulted in idiomatic English translations. In 1650 he entered Trinity College, Cambridge, where he took his B.A. degree in 1654. What Dryden did between leaving the university in 1654 and the Restoration of Charles II in 1660 is not known with certainty. In 1659 his contribution to a memorial volume for Oliver Cromwell marked him as a poet worth watching. His “heroic stanzas” were mature, considered, sonorous, and sprinkled with those classical and scientific allusions that characterized his later verse. This kind of public poetry was always one of the things Dryden did best. On December 1, 1663, he married Elizabeth Howard, the youngest daughter of Thomas Howard, 1st earl of Berkshire.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit-Tales from a Divided Country: Fragmented Nationalism in Anthony Cartwright’S the Cut, Amanda Craig’S the Lie of the Land, and Jonathan Coe’S Middle England
    Brexit-Tales from a Divided Country: Fragmented Nationalism in Anthony Cartwright’s The Cut, Amanda Craig’s The Lie of the Land, and Jonathan Coe’s Middle England Emma Linders, S2097052 Master thesis: Literary Studies, Literature in Society: Europe and Beyond University of Leiden Supervisor: Prof. Dr. P.T.M.G. Liebregts Second reader: Dr. M.S. Newton Date: 01-02-2020 (Zaichenko) Emma Linders 2 Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 3 CHAPTER 1 – Strangers in a Familiar Land: National divisions in Anthony Cartwright’s The Cut ......... 10 Outsider Perspective ......................................................................................................................... 10 Personification .................................................................................................................................. 11 Demographic Divides ........................................................................................................................ 11 Foreign Home Nation ........................................................................................................................ 13 Class Society ...................................................................................................................................... 14 Geography ......................................................................................................................................... 16 Language
    [Show full text]
  • Darnley Portraits
    DARNLEY FINE ART DARNLEY FINE ART PresentingPresenting anan Exhibition of of Portraits for Sale Portraits for Sale EXHIBITING A SELECTION OF PORTRAITS FOR SALE DATING FROM THE MID 16TH TO EARLY 19TH CENTURY On view for sale at 18 Milner Street CHELSEA, London, SW3 2PU tel: +44 (0) 1932 976206 www.darnleyfineart.com 3 4 CONTENTS Artist Title English School, (Mid 16th C.) Captain John Hyfield English School (Late 16th C.) A Merchant English School, (Early 17th C.) A Melancholic Gentleman English School, (Early 17th C.) A Lady Wearing a Garland of Roses Continental School, (Early 17th C.) A Gentleman with a Crossbow Winder Flemish School, (Early 17th C.) A Boy in a Black Tunic Gilbert Jackson A Girl Cornelius Johnson A Gentleman in a Slashed Black Doublet English School, (Mid 17th C.) A Naval Officer Mary Beale A Gentleman Circle of Mary Beale, Late 17th C.) A Gentleman Continental School, (Early 19th C.) Self-Portrait Circle of Gerard van Honthorst, (Mid 17th C.) A Gentleman in Armour Circle of Pieter Harmensz Verelst, (Late 17th C.) A Young Man Hendrick van Somer St. Jerome Jacob Huysmans A Lady by a Fountain After Sir Peter Paul Rubens, (Late 17th C.) Thomas Howard, Earl of Arundel After Sir Peter Lely, (Late 17th C.) The Duke and Duchess of York After Hans Holbein the Younger, (Early 17th to Mid 18th C.) William Warham Follower of Sir Godfrey Kneller, (Early 18th C.) Head of a Gentleman English School, (Mid 18th C.) Self-Portrait Circle of Hycinthe Rigaud, (Early 18th C.) A Gentleman in a Fur Hat Arthur Pond A Gentleman in a Blue Coat
    [Show full text]
  • An A2 Timeline of the London Stage Between 1660 and 1737
    1660-61 1659-60 1661-62 1662-63 1663-64 1664-65 1665-66 1666-67 William Beeston The United Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company @ Salisbury Court Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company & Thomas Killigrew @ Salisbury Court @Lincoln’s Inn Fields @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields Sir William Davenant Sir William Davenant Rhodes’s Company @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane @ Red Bull Theatre @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields George Jolly John Rhodes @ Salisbury Court @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane The King’s Company The King’s Company PLAGUE The King’s Company The King’s Company The King’s Company Thomas Killigrew Thomas Killigrew June 1665-October 1666 Anthony Turner Thomas Killigrew Thomas Killigrew Thomas Killigrew @ Vere Street Theatre @ Vere Street Theatre & Edward Shatterell @ Red Bull Theatre @ Bridges Street Theatre @ Bridges Street Theatre @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane @ Bridges Street Theatre, GREAT FIRE @ Red Bull Theatre Drury Lane (from 7/5/1663) The Red Bull Players The Nursery @ The Cockpit, Drury Lane September 1666 @ Red Bull Theatre George Jolly @ Hatton Garden 1676-77 1675-76 1674-75 1673-74 1672-73 1671-72 1670-71 1669-70 1668-69 1667-68 The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company The Duke’s Company Thomas Betterton & William Henry Harrison and Thomas Henry Harrison & Thomas Sir William Davenant Smith for the Davenant Betterton for the Davenant Betterton for the Davenant @ Lincoln’s Inn Fields
    [Show full text]
  • The Oxford Companion to English Literature, 6Th Edition
    e cabal, from the Hebrew word qabbalah, a secret an elderly man. He is said by *Bede to have been an intrigue of a sinister character formed by a small unlearned herdsman who received suddenly, in a body of persons; or a small body of persons engaged in vision, the power of song, and later put into English such an intrigue; in British history applied specially to verse passages translated to him from the Scriptures. the five ministers of Charles II who signed the treaty of The name Caedmon cannot be explained in English, alliance with France for war against Holland in 1672; and has been conjectured to be Celtic (an adaptation of these were Clifford, Arlington, *Buckingham, Ashley the British Catumanus). In 1655 François Dujon (see SHAFTESBURY, first earl of), and Lauderdale, the (Franciscus Junius) published at Amsterdam from initials of whose names thus arranged happened to the unique Bodleian MS Junius II (c.1000) long scrip­ form the word 'cabal' [0£D]. tural poems, which he took to be those of Casdmon. These are * Genesis, * Exodus, *Daniel, and * Christ and Cade, Jack, Rebellion of, a popular revolt by the men of Satan, but they cannot be the work of Caedmon. The Kent in June and July 1450, Yorkist in sympathy, only work which can be attributed to him is the short against the misrule of Henry VI and his council. Its 'Hymn of Creation', quoted by Bede, which survives in intent was more to reform political administration several manuscripts of Bede in various dialects. than to create social upheaval, as the revolt of 1381 had attempted.
    [Show full text]
  • (Title of the Thesis)*
    TENDENCIA THATCHERITIS OR ENGLISHNESS REMADE The Fictions of Julian Barnes, Hanif Kureishi and Pat Barker by Heather Ann Joyce A thesis submitted to the Department of English In conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen‘s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada (July, 2011) Copyright © Heather Ann Joyce, 2011 Abstract Julian Barnes, Pat Barker, and Hanif Kureishi are all canonical authors whose fictions are widely believed to reflect the cultural and political state of a nation that is post-war, post-imperial and post-modern. While much has been written on how Barker‘s and Kureishi‘s early works in particular respond to and intervene in the presiding political narrative of the 1980s – Thatcherism – treatment of how revenants of Thatcherism have shaped these writers‘ works from 1990 on has remained cursory. Thatcherism is more than an obvious historical reference point for Barker, Barnes, and Kureishi; their works demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of how Thatcher‘s reworkings of the repertoires of Englishness – a representational as well as political and cultural endeavour – persist beyond her time in office. Barnes, Barker, and Kureishi seem to have reached the same conclusion as political and cultural critics: Thatcher and Thatcherism have remade not only the contemporary political and cultural landscapes but also the electorate and consequently the English themselves. Tony Blair‘s conception of the New Britain proved less than satisfactory because contemporary repertoires of Englishness repeat and rework historical and not incidentally imperial formulations of England and Englishness rather than envision civic and populist formulations of renewal. Barnes‘s England, England and Arthur & George confront the discourse of inevitability that has come to be attached to contemporary formulations of both political and cultural Englishness – both in terms of its predictable demise and its belated celebration.
    [Show full text]
  • "A Sharers' Repertory." Rethinking Theatrical
    Syme, Holger Schott. "A Sharers’ Repertory." Rethinking Theatrical Documents in Shakespeare’s England. Ed. Tiffany Stern. London: The Arden Shakespeare, 2020. 33–51. Bloomsbury Collections. Web. 26 Sep. 2021. <http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350051379.ch-002>. Downloaded from Bloomsbury Collections, www.bloomsburycollections.com, 26 September 2021, 08:28 UTC. Copyright © Tiffany Stern and contributors 2020. You may share this work for non-commercial purposes only, provided you give attribution to the copyright holder and the publisher, and provide a link to the Creative Commons licence. 2 A Sharers’ Repertory Holger Schott Syme Without Philip Henslowe, we would know next to nothing about the kinds of repertories early modern London’s resident theatre companies offered to their audiences. As things stand, thanks to the existence of the manuscript commonly known as Henslowe’s Diary , scholars have been able to contemplate the long lists of receipts and expenses that record the titles of well over 200 plays, most of them now lost. The Diary gives us some sense of the richness and diversity of this repertory, of the rapid turnover of plays, and of the kinds of investments theatre companies made to mount new shows. It also names a plethora of actors and other professionals associated with the troupes at the Rose. But, because the records are a fi nancier’s and theatre owner’s, not those of a sharer in an acting company, they do not document how a group of actors decided which plays to stage, how they chose to alternate successful shows, or what they, as actors, were looking for in new commissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisitions at the National Portrait Gallery, London, 2009–17
    The Michael Marks Charitable Trust Supplement Acquisitions at the National Portrait Gallery, London, 2009–17 THE COLLECTION OF the National Portrait Gallery, London, holdings. Most notably, this year, we fulfilled an ambition provides a fascinating insight into and commentary on Brit- held for more than 150 years, to acquire a portrait of the ish art, history and culture. Under the Museums and Galler- Duke of Wellington that does justice to such a national ies Act 1992, the Gallery maintains a collection of portraits hero. Painted for the Duke’s friend and admirer Lady Jersey, of the most significant people in British history, from the Thomas Lawrence’s last portrait of Wellington is a powerful, early Tudor period to the present – from Katharine Parr to yet strikingly intimate, portrait of one of the most iconic and Martin Parr. In practice, this means that works are acquired influential men in British history. according to the identity of the sitter and on the basis that We have benefited from the work of the Arts Council, the person represented should have made – or be making most recently in the allocation of the Lucian Freud archive – a substantial contribution to British history and culture. under the Acceptance in Lieu scheme. The allocation in- Within these essential criteria, the Gallery places great im- cludes an unfinished self-portrait (c.1985) and forty-seven portance on ensuring that its portraits reflect social and cul- sketchbooks, plus other drawings, watercolours and letters; tural diversity and represent a broad range of activities and the last-mentioned are currently the subject of a cataloguing achievements.
    [Show full text]
  • Age of Dryden Summary
    AGE OF DRYDEN SUMMARY John Dryden, (born August 9 [August 19, New Style], 1631, Aldwinkle, Northamptonshire, England—died May 1 [May 12], 1700, London), English poet, dramatist, and literary critic who so dominated the literary scene of his day that it came to be known as the Age of Dryden. The son of a country gentleman, Dryden grew up in the country. When he was 11 years old the Civil War broke out. Both his father’s and mother’s families sided with Parliament against the king, but Dryden’s own sympathies in his youth are unknown. About 1644 Dryden was admitted to Westminster School, where he received a predominantly classical education under the celebrated Richard Busby. His easy and lifelong familiarity with classical literature begun at Westminster later resulted in idiomatic English translations. In 1650 he entered Trinity College, Cambridge, where he took his B.A. degree in 1654. What Dryden did between leaving the university in 1654 and the Restoration of Charles II in 1660 is not known with certainty. In 1659 his contribution to a memorial volume for Oliver Cromwell marked him as a poet worth watching. His “heroic stanzas” were mature, considered, sonorous, and sprinkled with those classical and scientific allusions that characterized his later verse. This kind of public poetry was always one of the things Dryden did best. When in May 1660 Charles II was restored to the throne, Dryden joined the poets of the day in welcoming him, publishing in June Astraea Redux, a poem of more than 300 lines in rhymed couplets.
    [Show full text]
  • “A Poor Player That Struts and Frets His Hour Upon the Stage…”
    “A POOR PLAYER THAT STRUTS AND FRETS HIS HOUR UPON THE STAGE…” THE ENGLISH THEATRE IN TRANSITION A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Christin N. Gambill May, 2016 “A POOR PLAYER THAT STRUTS AND FRETS HIS HOUR UPON THE STAGE…” THE ENGLISH THEATRE IN TRANSITION Christin N. Gambill Thesis Approved: Accepted: _______________________________ _______________________________ Advisor Dean of the College Mr. James Slowiak Dr. John Green _______________________________ _______________________________ Faculty Reader Dean of the Graduate School Mr. Adel Migid Dr. Chand Midha _______________________________ _______________________________ Faculty Reader Date Dr. Hillary Nunn _______________________________ School Director Dr. J. Thomas Dukes ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I. “THIS ROYAL THRONE THIS SCEPTERED ISLE…” THE THEATRE OF THE ENGLISH RENAISSANCE ............................................................................................... 1 II. THE COMING STORM .............................................................................................. 14 III. THE AXE FALLS ...................................................................................................... 29 IV. UNDER THEIR NOSES ............................................................................................ 42 V. THE NEW ORDER ..................................................................................................... 53 VI. FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • England, Englishness and Brexit
    The Political Quarterly, Vol. 87, No. 2, April–June 2016 England, Englishness and Brexit ~ AILSA HENDERSON, CHARLIE JEFFERY, ROBERT LINEIRA, ROGER SCULLY, DANIEL WINCOTT AND RICHARD WYN JONES Abstract In the 1975 referendum England provided the strongest support for European integration, with a much smaller margin for membership in Scotland and Northern Ireland. By 2015 the rank order of ‘national’ attitudes to European integration had reversed. Now, England is the UK’s most eurosceptic nation and may vote ‘Leave’, while Scotland seems set to generate a clear margin for ‘Remain’. The UK as a whole is a Brexit marginal. To understand the cam- paign, we need to make sense of the dynamics of public attitudes in each nation. We take an ‘archaeological’ approach to a limited evidence-base, to trace the development of attitudes to Europe in England since 1975. We find evidence of a link between English nationalism and euroscepticism. Whatever the result in 2016, contrasting outcomes in England and Scotland will exacerbate tensions in the UK’s territorial constitution and could lead to the break-up of Britain. Keywords: England, Englishness, nationalism, euroscepticism, Brexit, referendum tries to achieve the impossible by uniting Introduction countries as diverse as Germany and Greece? Ahead of the forthcoming Remain/Leave EU referendum, the headline above the front Again, questions asked with obviously page editorial of the 3 February 2016 edition rhetorical intent. of the Daily Mail asked: ‘Who will speak for While the Daily Mail editorial provides England?’ It was an obviously rhetorical important insights into some key eurosceptic question. Britain’s most influential newspa- arguments, this article will focus instead on per has no doubt that it provides the authen- the framing provided in the headline, and in ‘ ’ tic voice of ‘middle England’.
    [Show full text]