IS 1392 (1999): Glass Milk Bottles [CHD 10: Glassware]

इंटरनेट मानक

Disclosure to Promote the Right To Information Whereas the Parliament of India has set out to provide a practical regime of right to information for citizens to secure access to information under the control of public authorities, in order to promote transparency and accountability in the working of every public authority, and whereas the attached publication of the Bureau of Indian Standards is of particular interest to the public, particularly disadvantaged communities and those engaged in the pursuit of education and knowledge, the attached public safety standard is made available to promote the timely dissemination of this information in an accurate manner to the public.

“जान का अधकार, जी का अधकार” “परा को छोड न तरफ” Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan Jawaharlal Nehru “The Right to Information, The Right to Live” “Step Out From the Old to the New”

“ान एक न भारत का नमण” Satyanarayan Gangaram Pitroda “Invent a New India Using Knowledge”

“ान एक ऐसा खजाना जो कभी चराया नह जा सकताह ै”ै Bhartṛhari—Nītiśatakam “Knowledge is such a treasure which cannot be stolen”

IS 1392 : 1999

Indian Standard GLASSMILKBOTTLES -SPECIFICATION (Fourth Revision )

ICS 55.100

0 BIS 1999

BUREAU OF INDIAN STANDARDS MANAK BHAVAN, 9 BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG NEW DELHI 110002

July 1999 Price Group 5 ~Glassware Sectional Committee, CHD 010

FOREWORD

This Indian Standard (Fourth Revision) was adopted by the Bureau of Indian Standards, after the draft finalized by the Glassware Sectional Committee had been approved by the Chemical Division Council.

This standard was first published in 1959 to facilitate the changeover to the metric system in the dairy industry. It was revised for the first time in 1967 to provide for additional quality requirements in respect of alkalinity, verticality and thermal shock for the rim of glass bottle, and subsequently revised in 197 1 to provideclassification of the dimensions in two categories - essential and recommended. The third revision took place in 1983 to keep it in line with the standards of Weights and Measures Packaged Commodities Rules, 1977.

Since two other types of 500 ml bottles with different dimensions may also be used as glass milk bottles, a need was felt to revise the standard to incorporate two more types of bottles of 500 ml capacity.

The composition of the technical committee responsible for the formulation of this standard is given in Annex D.

For the purpose of deciding whether a particular requirement of this standard is complied with, the final value, observed or calculated, expressing the result of a test or analysis, shall be rounded off in accordance with IS 2 : 19-60 ‘Rules for rounding off numerical values (revised)‘. The number of significant places retained in the rounded off value should bethe same as that of the specified value in this standard.

IS 1392 : 1999

Indian Standard GLASSMILKBOTTLES -SPECIFICATION (Fourth Revision )

1 SCOPE possible, be free from loading marks, cords and bubbles. This standard prescribes requirements and methods of sampling and test for cylindrical glass bottles for liquid 5.2 Annealing milk other than sterilized milk. The milk bottles shall be well annealed. 2 REFERENCES 5.3 Limit of Alkalinity The following Indian Standards contain provisions The milk bottles shall conform to Class HGB-3 of the which through reference in this text, constitute glass when graded according to the method prescribed provision of this standard. At the time of publication, in IS 2303 (Part l/Set 1). the editions indicated were valid. All standards are subject to revision, and parties to agreements based on 5.4 Shape this standard are encouraged to investigate the The general shape of the glass milk bottle may be as possibility of applying the most recent editions of the shown in Fig. 1 for Type 1, Fig. 2 for Type 2 and standards indicated below: Fig. 3 for Type 3. IS No. Title 5.4.1 Variation in Shape 2303 (Part l/ Grading glass for alkalinity: The shape of the bottle shall be such that when kept on Set 1) : 1994 Part I Hydrolytic resistance,Section a flat surface the sealing surface shall be parallel to the 1 Hydrolytic resistance of glass base. Also, a vertical line through the centre of the grains at 98’C - Method of test and circle formed by the inside neck opening shall pass classification (first revision) through the centre of the circle described by the bottom 4905 : 1968 Methods for random sampling resting surface. The maximum permissible variation in shape when tested according to the method given in 6654 : 1992 Glossary of terms relating to glass Annex A shall be 3 mm. containers (second revision) 5.4.2 Stability 11930 : 1986 Methods of thermal shock tests for grass containers The bottles shall be stable, that is, when placed on a flat surface and lightly tapped with finger near the 3 TERMINOLOGY neck, they shall not sway to and fro. For the purpose of this standard, the definitions given 5.5 Dimensions in IS 6654 shall apply. The milk bottles shall conform to the essential 4 TY-PES dimensions indicated in Fig. 1 for Type 1, Fig. 2 for Based on dimensions and shape, there are three types Type 2 and Fig. 3 for Type 3. of bottles, namely: NOTE - Wherever tolerances for dimensions have not been a) Type 1 of nominal capacities I-litre, 500-ml,. specified the dimensions given shall be taken as approximate and are for guidance. 250-ml and 200-ml; b) Type 2 of nominal capacity 500-ml; and 5.5.1 Neck Ring c) Type 3 of nominal capacity 500-ml. The details of the neck ring are given in Fig. 4. The neck rin-g shall conform to those dimensions indicated 5 REQUIREMENTS in Fig. 4 where tolerances have been specified. 5.1 Material and Workmanship 551.1 Serrations The milk bottles shall, as far as possible, be made of The outside of the lip of the glass milk bottle may be colourless glass and have a smooth surface without serrated or unserrated as agreed to between the cracks, pinholes, sharp edges or broken bubbles. They purchaser and the supplier. In case the outside of the shall be free from blisters and stones, and as far as lip is serrated, the serrations may be as given in

IS 1392: 1999

cupucily Essential Dimensions RecommendatoryDimensions,fr,r Guidance * I \ 5-----T B c E F* G* H l-be 25lf2 96+2 ill 31 91 201 152 231 SOO-ml 205.0f 1.5 75.5 * 1.5 89 30 73 142 128 161 250-m] 160.0f 1.5 63 rt 1 70 21 60 84 110 139 200-ml 144.0* 1.5 59+1 61 18 56 61 96 100 *Radii ‘F and ‘G’ to be measured from outside,

All dimensionsin millimetres. FIG. 1 GLASSMILK BOTI’LE, TYPE 1

CupaciQ Essenriul Dimension.~ RecommendatoryDimensions.fijr Guidunce A * c \ / 3 A D B c E F* G* H 500.ml 205.0f 1.5 75.5 * 1.5 89 30 68+ 1.5 85 270 104 *Radii F and G to be measured from outside.

All dimensionsin millimetres. FIG. 2 GLASS MILK BOTTLE.TYPE 2

2 IS 1392: 1999

Annex B. This annex includes only a recommended Bottle Size Full Capacity, ml design and it is for the guidance of the manufacturers. 1-litre NOTE- The diameter, 36 mm of the lower portion of the neck 500-ml and the dimensions D, E, G, H andF areexternal dimensions (see Fig. I, 2.3 and 4). 250-ml 26Ok5 5.6 Full Capacity 200-ml 2Q9*5 The full capacity of milk bottles shall be as given below :

OD’D’ I

U .-_-_ ID’E’ J

Cupucity Essenfial Dimensions Recommendatory Dimensions for Guiduncr #x f \ r- A B B c E F* c; 500.ml 205+ 1.5 75.5 f 1.5 89 33 68 106 35 *Radii F and G to be measured from outside.

Alldimensions in millimetres. FIG.3 GLASS MILKBOTTLE,TYPE 3

OD 36.0to.5 . . OD 36.5 +_lD26.5+1.5 4.0 R-2.4

R-1.2 PI R0.4 I pi zs- +b i; R-1.5/

]I! 23 APPRO;]

w OD 36 I

NOTE - Wherever tolerances for dimensions have not been specified, the dimensions given shall be taken as approximate and are for guidance.

All dimensions in millimetres. FIG..~ DETAILS OF NECK RING

3 IS 1392 : 1999

5.6.1 A bottle shall be considered as critically failing shall be 450 g falling through a distance of 10 cm. The in performance if the capacity is lesser than the ball shall strike once at four different points in the same minimum value as given below: plane at the belly (30 to 45 mm from the base): a) on both seams, and Bottle Size Minimum Capacity, ml b) at the extremities of a diameter at right angles I-litre 993 to the joining seams. 500-ml 493 5.9.1.1 The bottle shall be deemed to have failed the 250-ml 247 test if there is a complete fracture, that is, a pieceof 200-ml 197 glass falls off from it, or if a crack develops in its body. 5.6.2 For the purpose of checking and quality control 6 MARKING AND PACKING at the manufacturer’s level, the average brimful capacity of 32 bottles shall be as given below: 6.1 Marking

Bottle Size Average Capacity, ml Each bottle shall be marked with the following 1-litre 10151t5 information: a) Indication of source of manufacture; 500-ml 510*4 b) Batch No. or Lot No.; and 250-ml 260 + 2.5 c) Capacity of the bottle in millilitres for 500-ml, 200-ml 209+2 250-ml and 200-ml bottles and ‘1 litre’ for 5.7 Mass of Bottles I-litre bottles.

The maximum mass of milk bottles shall be as follows: -6.2 BIS Certification Marking

Bottle Size Mass, Max, g The bottles may also be marked with the Standard Mark. I-litre 785 500-ml 500 6.2.1 The use of the Standard Mark is governed by the 250-ml 315 provisions of the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 and the Rules.and Regulations made thereunder. 200-ml 260 The details of conditions under which a licence for the 5.8 Thermal Shock Test use of the Standard Mark may be granted to manufacturers or producers may be obtained from the The bottles shall pass the thermal shock test as Bureau oflndian Standards. prescribed in IS 11930 when tested at hot bath temperature 72°C and cold bath temperature 30°C. 6.2 Packing

5.9 Impact Test The glass bottles shall be packed as agreed to between the purchaser and the supplier. The milk bottles shall pass the impact test conducted in the manner as described in 59.1 and 5.9.1.1. 7 SAMPLING 5.9.1 The bottle shall be struck with a hardened The method of drawing representative samples of spherical steel ball. The effective mass of the ball glass milk bottles and the criteria for conformity shall be as prescribed in Annex C.

4 IS 1392: 1999

ANNEX A (CZuuse5.4.1) TEST FOR VARIATION IN SHAPE

A-O GENERAL stability and place it on its base on the flat plate having a shaft bolted to it at right angles. Adjust the ‘V block A-0.1 This test determines the combined effect of the mounted on the shaft in such a manner that it is in offset of mouth with the body and the mouth being at contact with the outer diameter of the bottle at about an angle to the body. the middle. Adjust the dial indicator fitted to the shaft A-l ASSEMBLY so that its measuring point comes in contact with the outer edge of the neck of the bottle. Rotate the bottle, A-l.1 Assembly for the determination of variation in keeping the body always in contact with the ‘V’ block. shape shall be as shown in Fig. 5. Note down the maximum deflection on the indicator.

A-2 PROCEDURE A-2.1.1 Half of the total deflection shown by the A-2.1 Fill the bottle with water in order to give it more indicator shall be the variation in shape.

/FL*1PLATE

FIG.~ ASSEMBLYFORTESTINGOFVARIATION~NSHAPE

IS 1392 : 1999

ANNEX B (Chse 5.5.1.1) DETAILS OF SERRATIONS

B-l LOCATION OF SERRATIONS shall be approximately as given below: B-l.1 The serrations should not start from the top of Length 4mm the lip but should start front approximately 2.5 mm Depth 0.4 mm below the top of the lip. Width at the base 1.O mm

B-2 NUMBER OF SERRATIONS AND THEIR B-3 DESIGN OF SERRATIONS DIMENSIONS D-3.1 The recommended design of the serrations is B-2.1 The total number ot’ serrations shall be given in Fig. 6. approximately 60. The dimensions of the serrations

23 IO APPROX

All dimensions in millimetres. FIG. 6 RECOMMENDEDDESIGN OF SERRATIONS

6 IS 1392 : 1999

ANNEX C (CZuuse7) SAMPLING OF GLASS MILK BOTTLES

C-l SCALE OF SAMPLING Table 1 Criterion for Conformity at Different Stages of Testing for Visual, Dimensional, C-1.0 In the absence of an agreement between the Capacity and Mass Requirements purchaser and the vendor as to the scale of sampling (Clauses C-2.2, C-2.2.1, C-2.2.2 andC-2.3.1) and as a guide to such an agreement, the following scale is recommended. Stage Sample Combined Acceptance Rejection Sila Samplesize Number Number c-1.1 Lot (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) First 32 32 0 4 All bottles shall be separated in groups of 1000 bottles Second 32 64 1 6 or less, as the case may be. Each such group shall Third 32 96 3 8 constitute a lot. Fourth 32 128 5 10 Fifth 32 160 I I1 C-l.2 Tesk Sample Sixth 32 192 10 12 Seventh 32 224 13 14 A sample of 224 bottles shall be selected at random (see IS 4905) from each lot. These 224 bottles shall constitute a test sample for the lot. C-2.2.4 A bottle in the sample shall be considered as critically defective if it fails to satisfy the capacity C-2 NUMBER OF TESTS AND CRITERIA FOR requirements given in 5.6.1. A lot shall be rejected CONFORMITY without any further testing if any bottle in the sample is found to be critically defective at any stage. C-2.1 For Ascertaining the conformity of the lot to the requirements of this specification, samples shall be C-2.3 The lot having been found satisfactory tested from each lot separately. according to C-2.2, shall be ‘further tested for thermal shock (5.8) and impact (5.9). For each of these tests, C-2.2 Tests for visual (see 5.1 and 5.4), dimensional the number of bottles tested at each stage shall be 8 as (see 5.5), capacity (see 5.6) and mass (see 5.7) shown in Table 2. The required number of bottles may requirements shall be carried out in stages by taking be taken from those already tested and found 32 bottles at each stage out of the test sample as shown satisfactory according to C-2.2. If, however, in Table 1. additional bottles are required for testing, these may be taken at random afresh from the lot. C-2.2.1 A bottle failing to satisfy any of these requirements shall be considered as defective. The lot C-2.3.1 The decision about the conformity or shall be-considered as satisfying these requirements if otherwise of the lot for these requirements or about the number of defectives found in %he sample is less carrying out further testing shall be taken in than or equal to the corresponding acceptance number accordance with C-2.2.1, C-2.2.2 and C-2.2.3 except given in co1 4 of Table 1. that Table 2 shall be referred instead of Table 1.

C-2.2.2 If the number of defective bottles found in the Table 2 Criterion for Conformity at Different sample is greater than or equal to the corresponding Stages of Testing for Thermal Shock and Impact rejection number given in co1 5 of Table 1, the lot shall (Clauses C-2.3 and C-2.3.1) be rejected without further testing. Stage Sample Combined Acceptance Rejection C-2.2.3 If the number of defective bottles found in the Size for Sample Size Number Number sample is between the corresponding acceptance and Each Test for Each Test rejection numbers, testing shall be carried out to the (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 1) next stage. The total number of defectives in the First 8 8 2 combined sample shall then be compared against the Second 8 16 0 3 Third 8 24 0 3 acceptance and rejection number of that stage of Fourtj~ 8 32 I 4 testing. If no decision is arrived at by the procedure, Fifth 8 40 2 4 given in C-2.2.1 or C-2.2.2, testing shall be continued Sixth 8 48 3 5 to a stage further and so on up to the seventh stage till Seventh 8 56 4 5 a decision is finally reached. 1) Acceptance not permissible at th$ stage.

7 IS 1392: 1999

C-2.4 The lot having been found satisfactory is not available, these bottles may be drawn at random according to C-2.1 and C-2.2 shall be finally tested for afresh from the lot. limit of alkalinity (see 5.3). In this case, five bottles C-2.4.1 The lot shall be declared as conforming to~the shall be tested. For this purpose, the bottles already requirements of this specification if none of the bottles tested according to C-2.2 and found satisfactory, may tested for alkalinity fails to satisfy the corresponding be used. If, however, the required number of bottles specification requirements, otherwise not.

8 IS 1392 : 1999

ANNEX D (Foreword) COMMITTEE COMPOSITION

Glassware Sectional Committee, CHD 10

Chairman Representing DR R. N. DWIVEDI Central Glas & Ceramic Research Institute, Calcutta Members SHRI S. K. DAS (Alfernate to Dr R. N. Dwivedi) SHRI N. K. AGARWAL Hmdustan Safety Glass Works Ltd, Calcutta SHRI P. K. AGARWAL(Alternate I) SHRI SANIAY AGARWAL(Altemute 11) SHRI P. K. CHA-I-I?ZRJEE Victory Flask Co Fvt Ltd. Mumbai CHIEFCHEMIST Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenues, Central~Revenues Control DEPUW CHIEFCHEMIST (AIfernate) Laboratory. New Delhi SHRI B. M. CHOPRA Research, Designs and Standards Organization, Lucknow SHRI K. K. MANIAR(Alternute) DR S. P. SINGH DHAKAREY Ministry of Defense, DGQA (GS), Kanpur SHRIGIRISH TRIVEDI (Alrernate) SHRI OM P. DHAMIIA Export Inspection Council of India, New Delhi SHRI P. P. SAXENA(Alrernure) SHR~N. S. GHOSH The Indo-Asahi Glass Co Ltd. Calcutta SHRI B. P. MISHRA (Alterruzre) SHRI P. 1. JAYAKUMARAN Directorate General of Supplies & Disposal (QA Wing), New Delhi SHRI N. K. KAUSHAL(Alfernafe) ’ SHRI A. A. JOSHI Indian Institute of Packaging, Mumbai SHRI M. KRISHNAMURTHY(Alternate) SHRI P. C. JUNARKAR Philips India Ltd. Mumbai SHRIH. K. GHOSH (Alternate) SHRI S. K. KALHAN Mohan Crystal Glass Works, Ghaziabad SHRI K. K. SAXENA (ALternate) SHRI A. B. KARADIKAR Ballarpur Industries Ltd, New Delhi SHRI V K. MAHAJAN(Alternate) SHRI N. H. MALKAMPATE Ministry of Industry, Department of Industrial Development, New Delhi DR K. R. MURTHY (Alternate) SHRI D. S. MATHUR United Breweries Ltd, Bangalore SHRI S. K. RASTOCI(Ahntrte) SHRIS. S. BHATIA Hind Lamps Ltd, Shikohabad SHRIN V PATEL Alemhic Glass Industries Ltd. Vadodara SHRIN. S. PATEL (Ahernute) SHRIA. K. RAY Haryana Sheet Glass Ltd, Sonepat SHRIR. N. GUHA (Aber-nure) SHRI P. R. RAo Borosil Glass Works Ltd, Mumbai SHRI M. S. KALE (Alternute) SHRI L. V. RAO Trlveni Sheet Glass Works Ltd. Calcutta SHRIPARTHO DATTA (Alternufe) SHRI1. V. RAO Mxuti Udyog Ltd. Gurgaon SHRID. N. DAVE (Afternare) REPRESE~ATIVE Eagle Flaqk Industries (India) Pvt Ltd, Mumbai REPRESENTATIVE Delhi Milk Scheme, Delhi SHRI R. SAHAI Hindustan Vacuum Glass Ltd. Faridabad SHRIR. P. SHARMA(Alternate) SHRI JOHARSENGUITA National Buildmg Construction Company Ltd, New Delhi SHRI A. G. DHONGADE(Alrernare) SHRI L. T. P. SINHA Drvelopment Commissioner, Small Scale Industries, New Delhi SHRIC. H. SUBRAMANYAM(A~~~~W~~ SHRIC. K. SOMANY Hindustan Nn~~onal Glass & Industries Ltd. Calcutta SHRIJ. N. KUNDAN (Alrernute) Srsi~R. P. SRIVASTAVA All lndlaGI~\\ Hanufacturers’ Federation, New Delhi IKIUMESH SINHA The Mahaiahshmi Glass Works Pvt Ltd. Mumbai SHRI M. 1. ISRANI(Atrernure) StiRI M. M. MALHOTRA, Director Generai, BIS (Ex-olficio Member) Director (Chem)

Member-Secretclg DR DEVENDKA Mo,j~\ Additional Director (Chem I BIS

IS 1392 : 1999

(Continued.from page 9)

Glass Containers and General Glassware Subcommittee. CHD IO : 04

Convener SHRI C. K. SOMANY Hindustan National Glas Indushxx Lid. Calcutta Member.7 SHRIA. C. JAIN (Alternate to SHRI C. K. Somany) SHRI A. S. BASU Haryana Sheet Glass Ltd. Soncp:u SHRI P. K. CHATTERJEE Victory Flask Co PVI Ltd. Mumhai SHRIM. M. RAKTAWADE(Alrernate) SHRI R. N. DESAI Larsen & Touhro Ltd. Mumhw SHRIM. D. PANDE (Alternate) SHRI R. S. GUFTA Glass Equipment Manufactwers. Bah:tdurgarh SHRI A. A. JOSHI lndinn Institute of Packaging, Mumhal SHRI M. KRISHNAMURTHY(Alternate) SHRI V. R. KRISHNAMURTHY Metal Box liidia Ltd. Calcutta SHRI N. SREERANALU(Alternate) SHRI R. KUMAR Borosil Glas Works Ltd, Munlbai SHRI P. R.~RAo (Alternute) SHRI R. N. MUNGLE Pa& (Exports) Pvt Ltd. Mumhal SHRI K. H. PARIKH Vazir Glass Works Pvt Ltd, hlumtw SHRI S. D. MARKETKAR(Alrernute) SHRI M. H. PARIKH Herbertsons Ltd. Mumbai SHRI N. S. SHAH (Alternate) SHRI N V PATEL Alembic Glass Industries Lrd. Vndodara SHRI N. S. PATEL (Alternate) REPRESENTATIVE Eagle Flask Industries (India) Pvt Ltd. Mumbai REPRESENTATIVE Heldin Glass, Mumbai REPRESENTATIVE Hindustan Seals, Calcutta REPRESENTATIVE Universal Glass Ltd. Snhlhabad SHRI UMESHSINHA Mahalaxmi Glass Works Pvt Ltd. Mumhni SHRI M. J. ISRANI(Alternure) SHRI M. A. SOBHAN Ballarpur-Industries Ltd. Delhi SHRI V. K. MAHAJAN(Alrernure) SHRI A. S. SOOD The Development Commwioner. Small Scale Industries. New Delhi SHRI N. V.~REDDY (Alternate) DR K. P. SRIVASTAVA Central Glass&Ceramic Rcscarch Institute, Calcutta DR S. THIACARAJAN (Alrernute) SHRI R. P. SRIVASTAVA All India Glass Manufacturers‘ Federation. New Delhi

10 .

AMENDMENT NO. 1 NOVEMBfiR 2005 TO IS 1392:1999 GLASS MILK BOTTLES — SPECIFICATION

( Fourth Reviswn )

( Page 4, clause 5.9.1.1) —-Insert the following at the end: ‘5.10 Bottle Washing All bottles shall be thoroughly cleaned immediately before filling by automatic/semi-automatic washing machines. Washing shall be accomplished by pre-rinse and final rinse. For final rinse dechlorinated potable water shall be used. Bottles should be thoroughly drained, sterilized and dried after final rinse so that strength and purity of content is not affected after filling. Water jets in the washing machine should be so designed and jet pressure so maintained as to thoroughly rinse the whole internal and external surface Mea of the bottles. Wash water in the bottle washer should be thoroughly dmined and changed frequently to prevent algal growth. 5.10.1 Wherever second hand bottles are being used, all the bottles should be pre-washed prior to feeding to the bottle washer. This should be done in the following manner: d) Pre-rinse first soaking in a tank to remove labels and other extraneous matter. e) Rinse in the second tank with hot water around 60°C and 3 percent caustic solution at 60°C using brushes to clean the interior and exterior of bottles thO~OU@y. f) Final rinse in the third tank with potable water. d) Feed the bottles to bottle washer.’

(CHD1O)

Reprography Unit, BIN, New Delhi, India

‘p