DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix C Archaeological Survey Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix C Archaeological Survey Report Appendix C Archaeological Survey Report ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT FOR THE PETERS CANYON BIKEWAY EXTENSION PROJECT, TUSTIN AND ORANGE, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA California Department of Transportation, District 12 Federal Project Number: CML-5955(115) Prepared by October, 2020 Monica Strauss, M.A., RPA Date PQS-Principal Investigator Prehistoric and Historic Archaeology Environmental Science Associates 626 Wilshire Boulevard Suite 1100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Reviewed by: Jonathan Wright Date PQS-Lead Archaeological Surveyor California Department of Transportation, District 12 1750 East 4th Street, Suite 100 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Approved by: Charles Baker Date Senior Environmental Planner California Department of Transportation, District 12 1750 East 4th Street, Suite 100 Santa Ana, CA 92705 USGS topographic quadrangle: Orange, California APE Acreage: approximately 15.95 acres Resources: Negative Survey Date Completed: October 2020 This page intentionally left blank Summary of Findings Summary of Findings Orange County Public Works (OCPW) proposes to construct a Class I bike line along a 1.15- mile stretch of Jamboree Road from Canyon View to Pioneer Road, and a 1.55-mile-long Class II bike lane on Pioneer Road within the cities of Tustin and Orange, Orange County. The proposed project would connect the existing Peters Canyon Trail to Orange County’s larger bikeway network and would include: the construction of a Class I multi-use bikeway and sidewalk along the west side of Jamboree Road; striping of 8-foot-wide buffered Class II bike lanes on both sides of Pioneer Road; installation of bike path wayfinding signage; and construction of retaining walls with V-ditches, tree removal, landscaping, drainage systems and decorative fence installations, utility relocation, and sidewalk removal along the west side of Jamboree Road. The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) is the lead agency under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and OCPW is the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The environmental review, consultation, and any other actions required by applicable federal environmental laws for this project are being, or have been, carried out by Caltrans pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327 and the Memorandum of Understanding dated December 23, 2016, and executed by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Caltrans. The purpose of this study is to identify any cultural resources that could be affected by the undertaking. This report details the methods and results of this study, which included a records search, a Sacred Lands File (SLF) search, Native American consultation, a geoarchaeological review, and a field survey. The studies for this undertaking were carried out in a manner consistent with Caltrans’ regulatory responsibilities under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (36 CFR Part 800) and pursuant to the January 2014 First Amended Programmatic Agreement among the Federal Highway Administration, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the California State Historic Preservation Officer, and the California Department of Transportation Regarding Compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106 PA). In accordance with Section 106 PA Stipulation VIII.A, an Area of Potential Effects (APE) was established for the undertaking. The approximately 15.95-acre horizontal APE includes the following components: the construction footprint for the Class I multi- use/combined bikeway and temporary construction area along the west side of Jamboree Road; the entire roadway of Pioneer Road where Class II striping would be established; two staging areas located within existing parking lots in Peters Canyon Regional Park; and access routes to Staging Areas #1 and #2 from a paved entrance off of Jamboree Road and from Canyon View Avenue, respectively. The vertical APE includes the anticipated maximum depth of ground disturbance of 15 feet below ground surface for grading activities, and the maximum height of aboveground components is expected to reach 3 to 8 feet in height for the construction of retaining walls. Peters Canyon Bikeway Extension Project i Archaeological Survey Report Summary of Findings A records search for the project was conducted on July 23, 2020, by staff at the California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC). The records search included a review of all recorded cultural resources and previous studies within the APE and a 1-mile radius around the APE. The records search results indicate 89 cultural resources studies have been conducted within the records search study area. Of these 89 studies, 12 overlap the APE with approximately 80 percent of the APE having been included as part of previous cultural resources surveys. The records search results also indicate that 35 cultural resources have been previously recorded within a 1-mile radius of the APE. Of these 35 cultural resources, 21 are prehistoric archaeological sites, seven are historic-period archaeological sites, three are multicomponent archaeological sites, three are historic-period built resources, and four are prehistoric isolates. None of the 35 previously recorded cultural resources are located within the APE. Native American consultation was undertaken for the proposed project. An SLF search was conducted by the California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) on June 9, 2020 indicating no known Native American cultural resources are within the APE or its vicinity. The NAHC included a list of 15 California Native American Tribes who may also have knowledge of cultural resources in the area. Outreach letters were sent to all 15 Native American contacts listed on the NAHC’s contact list via certified mail and email on August 17, 2020. Follow-up phone calls were placed on August 26 and September 2, 2020. Of the 15 Native American representatives contacted, six responses have been received to date. The responses are summarized in the Summary of Native American Consultation section of this report. No Native American cultural resources have been identified within the APE based on the consultation conducted to date. On August 13 and October 11, 2020, ESA conducted a pedestrian survey of the APE to identify archaeological resources that could be impacted by project-related ground- disturbing activities. Given the developed nature of the APE numerous survey strategies were employed including reconnaissance (windshield) survey of paved areas, and mixed systematic and opportunistic survey in areas where ground surface was visible. Areas subject to systematic survey were surveyed using transects spaced at intervals no greater than 15 meters (approximately 50 feet). No cultural resources were identified as a result of the survey No archaeological resources were identified in the APE as a result of the archival research or field survey. Given the highly disturbed nature of the APE, which is largely composed of residential development, the likelihood of encountering intact subsurface archaeological deposits during proposed project construction is low. This study concludes that no cultural resources qualifying as historic properties pursuant to Section 106 of the NHPA will be adversely affected as a result of the proposed project; a finding of No Historic Properties Affected is recommended for this undertaking. It is Caltrans' policy to avoid cultural resources whenever possible. If buried cultural materials are encountered during construction, it is Caltrans' policy that work stop in that area until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the nature and significance of the find. Peters Canyon Bikeway Extension Project ii Archaeological Survey Report Table of Contents Table of Contents Summary of Findings ........................................................................................................ i Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. iii Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 1 Project Location and Description .................................................................................... 2 Project Location ............................................................................................................ 2 Project Description ........................................................................................................ 2 Area of Potential Effects ............................................................................................... 3 Sources Consulted ............................................................................................................. 3 Summary of Records Search Methods and Results ...................................................... 3 Summary of Native American Consultation ................................................................. 9 Background ..................................................................................................................... 10 Environment ................................................................................................................ 11 Ethnography ................................................................................................................ 12 Prehistory .................................................................................................................... 13
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Archaeological Evaluation Report and Recommendation for the Irvine Business Complex, City of Irvine, California
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF THE UPTOWN NEWPORT VILLAGE PROJECT, CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: The Planning Center|DC&E 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Authors: Molly Valasik, Sherri Gust and Courtney Richards Principal Investigator: Sherri Gust, Orange County Certified Professional Paleontologist and Archaeologist January 2012 Cogstone Project Number: 2265 Type of Study: Cultural resources assessment Fossil Localities: none Archaeological Sites: none USGS Quadrangle: Tustin 7.5’ photorevised 1981 Area: 25-acres Key Words: Gabrielino, Tongva, Quaternary Older Paralic Deposits 1518 West Taft Avenue Branch Offices cogstone.com Orange, CA 92865 West Sacramento - Morro Bay - Inland Empire – San Diego Office (714) 974-8300 Toll free (888) 497-0700 Uptown Newport Village TABLE OF CONTENTS MANAGEMENT SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................ III INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 PURPOSE OF STUDY .................................................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................................... 2 REGULATORY ENVIRONMENT ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Property Survey Report
    State of California Transportation Agency Department of Transportation HISTORIC PROPERTY SURVEY REPORT 1. UNDERTAKING DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION District County Route Post Mile(s) EA E-FIS Project Number 12 ORA 133 8.5/M9.3 0N8900 1214000130 The studies for this undertaking were carried out in a manner consistent with Caltrans’ regulatory responsibilities under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (36 CFR Part 800) and pursuant to the January 2014 First Amended Programmatic Agreement among the Federal Highway Administration, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, the California State Historic Preservation Officer, and the California Department of Transportation Regarding Compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (Section 106 PA), as well as under Public Resources Code 5024 and pursuant to the January 2015 Memorandum of Understanding Between the California Department of Transportation and the California State Historic Preservation Office Regarding Compliance with Public Resources Code Section 5024 and Governor’s Executive Order W-26-92 (5024 MOU) as applicable. Project Description: The California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) proposes this project along the southbound stretch of State Route 133 (SR-133; Laguna Canyon Freeway) to add a lane from the southbound Interstate 5 (I-5) connector (Post Mile [PM] M9.3) to the northbound Interstate 405 (I-405) connector (PM 8.5). Project PM M9.3 is rounded up from the actual PM for project work (M9.23); as such, the bridge at Irvine Center Drive at PM M9.23 is not within the project limits. The proposed auxiliary lane will be the second lane on the northbound I-405 connector.
    [Show full text]
  • Bayside Shopping Center
    BAYSIDE SHOPPING CENTER 1000 - 1090 Bayside Dr. Newport Beach, CA 92660 Cross Streets: Bayside Dr. & Jamboree Rd. DEMOGRAPHICS: 3 MILE RADIUS Gross Leasable Area: 64,353 sf Population: 95,800 Average Household Income: $147,357 Median Age: 43 MARKET PROFILE MAJOR TENANTS: • Situated at the entrance to Balboa Island, a popular OC destination for Bayside Restaurant year-round tourists, and Newport Harbor, the largest recreational boat Pavilions harbor on the U.S. west coast Rite Aid • Serves the affluent neighborhoods of Lido Isle, Balboa Island, and Promontory Point Sapori Ristorante Italiano • Less than one mile away is Newport Center®, the heart of Newport Beach Union Bank and home to hotels, apartment communities, the Newport Beach Civic Center, and over 2.5 million sf of office space For leasing information call Irvine Company 949.720.2535 ShopIrvineCompany.com 18'-2" 8'-6" 1 17'-8" 41' 42'-10" 94'-3" BAYSIDE 9' 21'-5" RESTAURANT 29' 21'-10" 900 19'-6" JAMBOREE ROAD 108' 15'-2" 8,000 SF 51'-5" 69'-8" 18'-7" 12'-6" BAYSIDE SHOPPING CENTER 34'-6" 4' 16'-4" 26'-6" 15'-2" 13'-9" 33'-8" 46' 12' 18'-6" 12'-6" 22'-8" 15'-2" 12'-6" 22'-2" 17'-3" Newport Beach, California RITE-AID 12'-8" 20'-2" 3'-4" 60' 1048 1032A 1024 1028 1040 1080 650 SF 1056 1072 1064 1016 900 SF SAPORI 1,200 SF 1,055 SF 1,500 SF 1,320 SF 1,080 SF 2,742 SF PAVILIONS 1,500 SF NEWPORT NAILS 58'-6" JUST ALTERATIONS THE UPS STORE 139' 8,986 SF THE WAFFLE AFFAIR BAYSIDE CLEANERS PIZZERIA BY SAPORI CLUB DETOX CLUB 35'-4" 106'-5" 1000 RESTAURANTE ITALIANO UNION BANK CAROL KLEIN
    [Show full text]
  • Washington and Yorba
    GENEALOGY OF THE WASHINGTON AND YORBA AND RELATED FAMILIES OUN1Y C/'.\Llf ORNIP ORA~\G~ . COG .' \CJ.\L SOC\E1)' GtNtJ\L Washington and Related Families - Washington Family Chart I M- Amphillus Twigden 6 Lawrence Washington 001-5. Thomas Washington, b. c. 1605, Margaret (Butler) Washington d. in Spain while a page to Prince Charles (later King Charles II) 1623. 001-1. Robert Washington, b. c. 1589, Unmd. eldest son and heir, d.s.p. 1610 Chart II 001-2. Sir John Washington of Thrapston, d. May 18, 1688. 1 Lawrence Washington M- 1st - Mary Curtis, d. Jan. 1, 1624 or Amphillus (Twigden) Washington 2 25, and bur. at Islip Ch. • M- 2nd - Dorothy Pargiter, d. Oct. 15, 002-1. John Washington, b. in Eng. 1678. 3 1632 or 1633, and emg. to VA c. 1659. He was b. at Warton Co. Lancaster, Eng. 001-3. Sir William Washington of He settled at Bridge's Creek, VA, and d. Packington, b. c. 1594, bur. Jun. 22, Jan. 1677. 1643, St. Martin's m the Field, M- 1st - Anne Pope, dtr of Nathaniel Middlesex Pope of Pope's Creek, VA. M- Anne Villiers 4 M- 2nd - Anne Brett M- 3rd - Ann Gerrard M- 4th - Frances Gerrard Speke Peyton 001-4. Lawrence Washington 5 Appleton 7 1 He was knighted at Newmarkel, Feb. 2 1, 1622 or 23. He 002-2. Lawrence Washington, bap. at and other members of his family often visited Althorpe, the Tring, Co. Hertfordshire, Jun. 18, 1635, home of the Spencers. He is buried in the Parish Ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, Circa 1852-1904
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/hb109nb422 Online items available Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Finding Aid written by Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Finding Aid to the Documents BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM 1 Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in Cali... Finding Aid to the Documents Pertaining to the Adjudication of Private Land Claims in California, circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Finding Aid Written By: Michelle Morton and Marie Salta, with assistance from Dean C. Rowan and Randal Brandt. Date Completed: March 2008 © 2008, 2013 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Documents pertaining to the adjudication of private land claims in California Date (inclusive): circa 1852-1904 Collection Number: BANC MSS Land Case Files 1852-1892 Microfilm: BANC MSS C-A 300 FILM Creators : United States. District Court (California) Extent: Number of containers: 857 Cases. 876 Portfolios. 6 volumes (linear feet: Approximately 75)Microfilm: 200 reels10 digital objects (1494 images) Repository: The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu/ Abstract: In 1851 the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Orange County Historical Site Plaques
    ORANGE COUNTY HISTORICAL SITE PLAQUES The Orange County Historical Commission (OCHC) has designated sites and structures of local or countywide significance as Historical Sites. Descriptive bronze plaques have been placed at each of these sites by the Orange County Board of Supervisors and OCHC. Each site is listed along with the wording on its plaque. If you have any questions about these sites or would like to nominate a site for the OCHC plaque program, please call the OCHC office at (714) 973-6609 for more information. OC Parks-OCHC- Historic Programs 13042 Old Myford Rd. Irvine, CA 92602 www.ocparks.com PLAQUE CEREMONY #1. SITE OF CARBONDALE October 9, 1976 8002 Silverado Canyon Rd., Silverado, CA 92676 In 1881, after the Southern Pacific took over the Santa Clara Coal Mine northeast of here, a bustling mining camp complete with hotel, saloons, shacks, store, and post office sprang up on these flats. Three years later the mine played out and Carbondale disappeared without a trace. # 2. DOCTOR GEORGE CROOK CLARK HOME AND OFFICE November 3, 1976 Arboretum, California State University, Fullerton, CA Built in 1894 by Fullerton's pioneer physician on the original townsite of Fullerton. An excellent example of the Eastlake Style of Victorian architecture faithfully preserved and maintained as part of California's heritage by hundreds of volunteers. # 3. EPISCOPAL CHURCH OF THE MESSIAH November 7, 1976 614 N. Bush St., Santa Ana, CA 92701 Santa Ana's oldest assembly on its original site was completed on 1888 and dedicated Easter 1889. Consecrated by Bishop Joseph Johnson October 31, 1887, with Rev.
    [Show full text]
  • The Irvine Ranch History Irvine Ranch Gives Way to Urban Development
    The Irvine Ranch History Irvine, California The Irvine Historical Society is dedicated to preserving the rich heritage of the Irvine Ranch, once one of the largest private ranches in the United States Irvine Ranch Gives Way to Urban Development At the beginning of the Second World War, the Irvine Ranch operated as one of the largest and most productive farming businesses in California. By the end of the war, urban pressure to develop was in full swing in northern Orange County. To the central and south county, the privately held farms continued to keep the developers away. Myford Irvine Takes Reins James Irvine, Sr.'s unexpected death in 1947 left the presidency of The Irvine Company to his only remaining child, Myford Plum Irvine. Myford was ill-suited for the job, and his short eleven-and one-half -year tenure led the ranch away from his father's agrarian pursuits, straight into commercial and residential development. Myford was the first major landowner to allow development to proceed southwards in the county. Myford was not a farmer. He leaned heavily on the advice of his father's ranch manager, Brad Hellis, whom he allowed to completely control The Irvine Company's agricultural operations. Myford loved the San Francisco social life, and did not share a consuming love of the land as had his brother, his father, and his grandfather. After attending Stanford University, he had elected to take over the management of his father's San Francisco offices and of his stocks and bonds. Known to everyone on the ranch as "Mike," Myford Irvine was a gentle soul - too gentle to run an empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Irvine Ranch History 1769 - 1942
    IRVINE RANCH HISTORY 1769 - 1942 1769 - 1800 Spanish Crown began colonization of California with Gaspar de Portola's 1769 expedition from Mexico to San Francisco. Jose Antonio Yorba was a sergeant in that expedition and later was the recipient of one of the large Spanish land grants in what is now Orange County. The purpose of the expedition was to chart the area for potential ports and possible sites for religious/military establishments to initiate settlement for the Spanish crown of the land discovered in 1542 by Juan Cabrillo. During the 30 years that followed Portola's expedition Spain strengthened its hold on the New World by building Presidios and Missions along California's coast. It is estimated that in the latter part of the 18th century over 200,000 Indians roamed the area's fertile plains and valleys. But by the end of the century most of the Indians had come under the jurisdiction of the Catholic missions. 1800 -1810 By 1801, Jose Antonio Yorba and his father-in-law, Juan Pablo Grijalva, began to pasture their cattle on land that would later be granted to Yorba but which he had first seen while part of Portola's expedition. On July 1,1810 the Spanish provincial governor granted Yorba and his nephew, Juan Peralta, ownership of the 62,516 acre Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana. It was one of the few Spanish grants made to private citizens. It extended from the Santa Ana Mountains to the Pacific ocean. It bordered on the northern edge of the future Irvine Ranch (including a portion of the N/E corner of it) and now includes a portion or all of the cities of Santa Ana, Tustin and Costa Mesa.
    [Show full text]
  • My Seventy Years in California, 1857-1927, by J.A. Graves
    My seventy years in California, 1857-1927, by J.A. Graves MY SEVENTY YEARS IN CALIFORNIA J. A. GRAVES MY SEVENTY YEARS IN CALIFORNIA 1857-1927 By J. A. GRAVES President Farmers & Merchants National Bank of Los Angeles Los Angeles The TIMES-MIRROR Press 1927 COPYRIGHT, 1927 BY J. A. GRAVES My seventy years in California, 1857-1927, by J.A. Graves http://www.loc.gov/resource/calbk.095 LOVINGLY DEDICATED TO MY WIFE ALICE H. GRAVES PREFACE Time flies so swiftly, that I can hardly realize so many years have elapsed since I, a child five years of age, passed through the Golden Gate, to become a resident of California. I have always enjoyed reading of the experiences of California pioneers, who came here either before or after I did. The thought came to me, that possibly other people would enjoy an account of the experiences of my seventy years in the State, during which I participated in the occurrences of a very interesting period of the State's development. As, during all of my life, to think has been to act, this is the only excuse or apology I can offer for this book. J. A. GRAVES. ix CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE I FAMILY HISTORY. MARYSVILLE IN 1857. COL. JIM HOWARTH 3 II MARYSVILLE BAR IN 1857. JUDGE STEPHEN J. FIELD ITS LEADER. GEN. GEO. N. ROWE. PLACERVILLE BAR AN ABLE ONE 13 III FARMING IN EARLY DAYS IN CALIFORNIA. HOW WE LIVED. DEMOCRATIC CELEBRATION AT MARYSVILLE DURING THE LINCOLN-MCCLELLAN CAMPAIGN 25 IV SPORT WITH GREYHOUNDS. MY FIRST AND LAST POKER GAME 36 V MOVING FROM MARYSVILLE TO SAN MATEO COUNTY 39 VI HOW WE LIVED IN SAN MATEO COUNTY 43 VII BEGINNING OF MY EDUCATION 46 VIII REV.
    [Show full text]
  • RELOOC Strategic Plan – Frank R. Bowerman Landfill Implementation EIR
    RELOOC Strategic Plan – Frank R. Bowerman Landfill Implementation EIR CLARIFICATIONS AND REVISIONS TO THE DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT This Section consists of clarifications and revisions to the RELOOC Strategic Plan – Frank R. Bowerman Landfill Implementation Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) that have resulted from responses to comments received from agencies and the public on the DEIR. The DEIR was released for a 45-day public review period (January 24, 2006 through March 9, 2006). Those parts of text that are underlined/crossed out indicate revisions by reference to the text of the DEIR. SECTION 1.0 – EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The following discussion replaces the first paragraph of Section 1.1.4.1 on page 1-4 of the DEIR by reference to clarify the proposed capacity of the landfill. “The expansion of the FRB Landfill would provide an additional MSW capacity of 130104 million cubic yards (mcy) over the current permitted capacity or total airspace of 130 mcy. This would extend the life of the landfill from its permitted closure date of 2022 to approximately 2053, based on an annual average refuse inflow rate at the currently permitted limit of 8,500 TPD in accordance with the existing City of Irvine Settlement Agreement for the landfill.” The following discussion replaces the first paragraph of Section 1.1.4.4 on page 1-6 of the DEIR by reference to clarify the number of equipment needed for the project and hours of operation. “The project may require that additional buildings and structures be constructed at the FRB Landfill and will require relocation of existing entrance facilities, scales/scale house, LFG control facilities and other landfill support facilities in a later phase of development (Phase X to begin filling operations in approximately 2041).
    [Show full text]
  • Irvine Guide to Shop, Dine, Play and Explore Table of Contents
    Irvine Guide to Shop, Dine, Play and Explore Table of Contents Arts/Culture, Attractions & Entertainment . 1 Golf . 6 Seasonal Events Calendar . 8 Special Events . 9 Parks & Recreation . 10 Retail Centers . 15 Restaurants . 33 Transportation . 45 Hospitals . 47 Disclaimer: The Irvine Guide to Shop, Dine, Play and Explore is provided as an informational resource and a community service to visitors. This Guide is not inclusive of all businesses in Irvine. The identification of companies, individuals and products is not intended and should not be treated as a recommendation, endorsement or approval by the City of Irvine. The City cannot and does not make any warranty or representation concerning the information contained in this Guide. While reasonable care has been taken to ensure the accuracy of the information in this Guide, the City shall not be held responsible for any errors or omissions. The information in this Guide may be changed in future publications. IRVINE GUIDE TO SHOP, DINE, PLAY AND EXPLORE • WWW.CITYOFIRVINE.ORG COSTA MESA FWY 55 REDHILL AVE. AL BARRANCA BR W IRVINE ALNUT MAIN TON VD. Y BL AN MICHELSON 19 CAMPUS PKWY A BL THUR ST VE A VD . VE . RD. MACAR . JAMBOREE RD 15 261 DR. Toll Rd A 24 VE. 14 6 9 16 1 HARVARD AVE. 4 BONIT UNIVERSITY CULVER DR. 2 IR 73 SAN DIEGO FWY VINE A 13 CANY YALE AVE. CENTER DRIVE POR 22 11 RD. ON 3 8 TOLA 23 A ANA FWY 7 DRIVE TRABUCO JEFFREY RD. Turtle PKWY Rock SANT 405 18 5 . RD. SAND CANYON AVE. CANYON SHADY 133 Toll Rd 241 17 LAGUNA CANYON RD 5 10 26 12 N 20 25 21 1.
    [Show full text]
  • TUSTIN LEGACY SPECIFIC PLAN City of Tustin | Ordinance 1482 07-18-17
    TUSTIN LEGACY SPECIFIC PLAN City of Tustin | Ordinance 1482 07-18-17 Prepared for: City of Tustin Community Planning 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 Prepared by: PlaceWorks 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 Santa Ana, CA 92707 TUSTIN LEGACY SPECIFIC PLAN City of Tustin | Ordinance 1482 07-18-17 Reuse Plan Adopted: October 31, 1996, Amended September 8, 1998 Specific Plan Adopted: City Council Ordinance No. 1257 Date: February 3, 2003 Zone Change 04-001 Ordinance 1295 03-07-05 Zone Change 04-002 Ordinance 1296 03-07-05 Zone Change 05-001 Ordinance 1299 06-06-05 Zone Change 05-002 Ordinance 1311 04-17-06 Zone Change 07-001 Ordinance 1335 06-05-07 Specific Plan Amendment 10-001 Ordinance 1379 03-16-10 Specific Plan Amendment 11-003 Ordinance 1406 10-18-11 Specific Plan Amendment 2011-04Ordinance 1413 04-03-12 Specific Plan Amendment 2012-002 Ordinance 1426 03-05-13 Specific Plan Amendment 2013-001Ordinance 1432 05-21-13 Specific Plan Amendment 2013-002 Ordinance 1440 03-04-14 Specific Plan Amendment 2014-001 Ordinance 1450 11-18-14 Prepared for: City of Tustin Community Planning 300 Centennial Way Tustin, CA 92780 Prepared by: PlaceWorks 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 Santa Ana, CA 92707 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CONSULTANTS CITY COUNCIL PLACEWORKS, INC. John Nielsen (former Mayor) Karen Gulley, Principal Dr. Allan Bernstein, Mayor 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 Al Murray, Mayor Pro Tem Santa Ana, CA 92707 Letitia Clark, Council Member 714.966.9220 Rebecca Gomez, Council Member Charles E. Puckett, Council Member FUSCOE ENGINEERING Ian Adam, Principal
    [Show full text]