DOCSLIB.ORG

Have You Ever Wondered How It Was That Hannibal Led an Army Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Hamilcar had left his corps of mercenaries under the general Gisgo, commandant of the garrison at the Have you ever wondered how it was that Hannibal led an port of Lilybaeum. The mercenary army of mercenaries for two decades and never faced a force was composed of assorted serious rebellion or major desertion? His army was often soldiers of fortune, including Liby- ans, Iberians, Celts, Ligurians, hungry, always pushed hard by the Romans and usually Balearics, Greeks, and Roman and faced appalling conditions. Yet his soldiers of fortune Italian deserters, as well as smaller invariably remained loyal. Many historians credit this bands from all around the Mediterra- nean world. These hardened profes- phenomena to Hannibal's charismatic leadership and his sionals had defeated Rome's legions concern for the welfare of his men. But there was a darker time and again, and were returning side. Hannibal's army had been created and trained by his not as a defeated army, but as a victorious corps forced to withdraw father, Hamilcar Barca. And every mercenary in that army only because of a naval defeat. soon learned the tales of the Truceless War. The long shadow of Hamilcar's ruthless suppression of that rebellion Gisgo wisely dispatched the merce- naries back to Carthage in small lingered in the collective memory of Hannibal's army. groups, so that each mercenary band These hard bitten soldiers of fortune had learned and could be paid off and sent back to accepted this fact - you just don't cross a Barca. their homeland before the next arrived. This procedure would have But the Romans still did not give up. prevented the massing of a danger- Historical Background Instead they raised another fleet, ous number of idle soldiers of fortune In the later years of the First Punic even after so many had been de- in the capitol. But the home authori- War (from 249 BC) the Carthaginian stroyed by storms and the Punic ties did just the opposite. Reluctant General Hamilcar (father of the great navy. The Roman navy won a to part with any money, they balked and delayed payment until the entire Hannibal) waged a masterful decisive victory off the Aegates mercenary army was concentrated in guerrilla war with a polyglot merce- Islands in 242 BC. It was now Carthage. The mercenaries began to nary corps against the Romans in Carthage that was exhausted, and get rowdy and brawls and distur- Western Sicily. His campaign was forced to sue for peace to end the bances became common. Only then the linchpin of a strategy that had First Punic War. Hamilcar Barca was did the government authorities successfully maintained a forced to accept the humiliating peace awaken to the danger of the situation. Carthaginian presence in Sicily for and withdraw his troops from the centuries. When confronted with a island. Barca, who thought that The senate decided to send all the powerful enemy, such as the things couldn't get any worse, mercenaries out of the city to the Syracusan tyrants Dionysius or resigned his command in disgust. nearby village of Sicca. But they still Agathocles, or the Epirote King But Hamilcar was wrong - things didn't pay them. The mercenaries' Pyrrhus, the Carthaginians would could get a lot worse. prolonged waiting allowed the withdraw to their western fortresses smoldering embers of discontent to and maintain only a toehold in Sicily. The Origin of the Truceless War burst into the flames of insurrection Their opponent would eventually The Carthaginians were looking and mutiny. Gisgo had been negoti- exhaust himself, and then the forward to a quiet period in order to ating with the mercenaries, and he Carthaginians would sweep back in. recoup their losses after 24 years of and his party were seized and held But the Roman legions had far greater combat (264-241 BC). Although a hostage. Two mercenary captains staying power than the mercenary heavy indemnity had been imposed emerged as generals of the rebel armies of the Greek warlords. Only by the victorious Romans, Carthage army. Mathos, a Libyan soldier, was Hamilcar's brilliant generalship would be easily able to pay this off joined by Spendius, a runaway allowed the Carthaginians to hang on once peace allowed her commerce to Campanian slave. for seven years. Hamilcar's hit-and- again prosper. One final detail run campaigns of raid and ambush remained to be taken care of — the Mathos invited the local Libyan earned him the name Barca or demobilization of the 20,000 merce- "Lightning". naries that had to be evacuated from Sicily. peasants to join his rebellion, and routed the militia army and seized all encouraging. Outside the city, received an enthusiastic response. of Hanno's artillery and siege train. Mathos' mercenaries continued to The rural populace had been harshly Hanno withdrew with the shattered besiege Utica and Hippacritae, and oppressed and heavily taxed by remnants of his army. his forces blocked all exits from Carthage during the long war with Carthage. The mutineers' victory Rome, and now leapt at the chance to Enter Hamilcar Barca over Hanno at Utica had encouraged overthrow their masters. Word was The senate now turned to Hamilcar thousands more Libyan and sent to outlying Libyan and Barca and pleaded with him to accept Numidian tribesmen to rebel. Things Numidian tribes, and volunteers a command. Barca agreed, but the were not much more encouraging in flocked into the rebel camps by the situation he found was hardly the city. Hamilcar managed to scrape thousands. So began the Truceless War, also known as the Mercenary War, the Libyan War or the Servile War, in late 241 BC. Opening Moves Their was no Carthaginian army on hand to oppose the rebels. Mathos set up his main base at Tunis, and dispatched divisions to besiege the cities of Utica and Hippacritae. A guard force occupied the main bridge over the Bagradas river, while other detachments covered all the fords. Carthage was completely sur- rounded, and shut off from contact with still friendly tribes and cities to the West and South. The senate appointed Hanno the Great to raise and field an army. Hanno had earned his title by ruthlessly sup- pressing the Libyan revolts that had followed the Roman invasion of Regulus (256-55 BC). Hanno had crushed the Libyans by routing their army and assaulting and sacking their main base at Hecatompylus. Hanno called out the civic militia and the citizen cavalry, organized an extensive siege train and added 100 elephants. Hanno did an excellent job of equipping, organizing and drilling his units into shape. But when Hanno took the field, his weaknesses as a commander were revealed. Hanno advanced on the rebel army at Utica, and overran the mercenary camp with an elephant charge supported by ballistae fire. Hanno, accustomed to fighting Libyan tribesman who fled for days once defeated, thought he had already won the war. But these mercenaries had been trained by Hamilcar Barca. They withdrew before the elephant charge only to regroup and counterattack later. The rebels stormed back into their camp, together about 8,000 second-string hardened mercenary veterans in a elephants and his superior militia infantry. But he couldn't straight fight. Barca pinned his hopes generalship. expect these raw levies to take on on his 2,000 heavy cavalry, his 70 Hamilcar seized the initiative. He discovered that it was possible to bypass the rebel blocking forces by fording the Bagradas River at its mouth under a favorable wind. Barca made his surprise crossing at night, and emerged in full battle array on the far side by morning. Hamilcar headed for the rebel guard force at the bridge, which probably numbered 5,000 men. Spendius, in command of the division besieging Utica, marched out to join with the force at the bridge, bringing another 10,000 troops. Once they sighted the enemy, the two rebel forces advanced to converge on the Carthaginian army. The Battle of Utica, Summer 240 BC Hamilcar's army was in three columns - nearest the enemy were his elephants, next the light infantry and cavalry, with the militia furthest over. Hamilcar ordered his elephants, light infantry and cavalry to conduct a feigned flight. The over anxious rebels were lured into a disorderly pursuit. But the Carthaginian mounted and light forces wheeled to the flanks of the militia line, and faced about. The elephants broke the rebel charge, and then the heavy cavalry hammered the open flanks of the rebel line. The militia in the center held just long enough, and the rebel army broke and fled. The rebels lost 6,000 men slain and 2,000 taken prisoner. (See Battle of Utica sidebar on previous page for Scenario.) Naravas and the Battle of Hippacritae, Fall 240 BC Hamilcar put his victory at Utica to good use, traversing the countryside and taking towns and villages back into Carthaginian alliance. Mean- while, Mathos continued his siege of Hippacritae. He dispatched Spendius with 6,000 crack mercenaries to observe and harass Hamilcar. Mathos also sent a band of 2,000 Gauls (more on this unit later) under their captain Autaritas to support Spendius, and ordered large Libyan and Numidian forces to join him as well. Hamilcar had received limited Hippacritae defected to the enemy. man garrisons that Carthage had sent reinforcements for his army, but These two key cities had remained to aid in their defense. The rebels, when the rebels massed over 20,000 loyal during the invasions of both strengthened by the financial support troops against him he was hard- Agathocles and Regulus, but now of these two major cities, advanced to pressed.
Recommended publications
  • Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs the Ptolemaic Family In

    Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs the Ptolemaic Family In

    Department of World Cultures University of Helsinki Helsinki Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs The Ptolemaic Family in the Encomiastic Poems of Callimachus Iiro Laukola ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be publicly discussed, by due permission of the Faculty of Arts at the University of Helsinki in auditorium XV, University Main Building, on the 23rd of September, 2016 at 12 o’clock. Helsinki 2016 © Iiro Laukola 2016 ISBN 978-951-51-2383-1 (paperback.) ISBN 978-951-51-2384-8 (PDF) Unigrafia Helsinki 2016 Abstract The interaction between Greek and Egyptian cultural concepts has been an intense yet controversial topic in studies about Ptolemaic Egypt. The present study partakes in this discussion with an analysis of the encomiastic poems of Callimachus of Cyrene (c. 305 – c. 240 BC). The success of the Ptolemaic Dynasty is crystallized in the juxtaposing of the different roles of a Greek ǴdzȅǻǽǷȏȄ and of an Egyptian Pharaoh, and this study gives a glimpse of this political and ideological endeavour through the poetry of Callimachus. The contribution of the present work is to situate Callimachus in the core of the Ptolemaic court. Callimachus was a proponent of the Ptolemaic rule. By reappraising the traditional Greek beliefs, he examined the bicultural rule of the Ptolemies in his encomiastic poems. This work critically examines six Callimachean hymns, namely to Zeus, to Apollo, to Artemis, to Delos, to Athena and to Demeter together with the Victory of Berenice, the Lock of Berenice and the Ektheosis of Arsinoe. Characterized by ambiguous imagery, the hymns inspect the ruptures in Greek thought during the Hellenistic age.
  • Persianism in Antiquity

    Persianism in Antiquity

    Oriens et Occidens – Band 25 Franz Steiner Verlag Sonderdruck aus: Persianism in Antiquity Edited by Rolf Strootman and Miguel John Versluys Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart 2017 CONTENTS Acknowledgments . 7 Rolf Strootman & Miguel John Versluys From Culture to Concept: The Reception and Appropriation of Persia in Antiquity . 9 Part I: Persianization, Persomania, Perserie . 33 Albert de Jong Being Iranian in Antiquity (at Home and Abroad) . 35 Margaret C. Miller Quoting ‘Persia’ in Athens . 49 Lloyd Llewellyn-Jones ‘Open Sesame!’ Orientalist Fantasy and the Persian Court in Greek Art 430–330 BCE . 69 Omar Coloru Once were Persians: The Perception of Pre-Islamic Monuments in Iran from the 16th to the 19th Century . 87 Judith A. Lerner Ancient Persianisms in Nineteenth-Century Iran: The Revival of Persepolitan Imagery under the Qajars . 107 David Engels Is there a “Persian High Culture”? Critical Reflections on the Place of Ancient Iran in Oswald Spengler’s Philosophy of History . 121 Part II: The Hellenistic World . 145 Damien Agut-Labordère Persianism through Persianization: The Case of Ptolemaic Egypt . 147 Sonja Plischke Persianism under the early Seleukid Kings? The Royal Title ‘Great King’ . 163 Rolf Strootman Imperial Persianism: Seleukids, Arsakids and Fratarakā . 177 6 Contents Matthew Canepa Rival Images of Iranian Kingship and Persian Identity in Post-Achaemenid Western Asia . 201 Charlotte Lerouge-Cohen Persianism in the Kingdom of Pontic Kappadokia . The Genealogical Claims of the Mithridatids . 223 Bruno Jacobs Tradition oder Fiktion? Die „persischen“ Elemente in den Ausstattungs- programmen Antiochos’ I . von Kommagene . 235 Benedikt Eckhardt Memories of Persian Rule: Constructing History and Ideology in Hasmonean Judea .
  • A Glimpse Into the Roman Finances of the Second Punic War Through

    A Glimpse Into the Roman Finances of the Second Punic War Through

    Letter Geochemical Perspectives Letters the history of the western world. Carthage was a colony founded next to modern Tunis in the 8th century BC by Phoenician merchants. During the 3rd century BC its empire expanded westward into southern Spain and Sardinia, two major silver producers of the West Mediterranean. Meanwhile, Rome’s grip had tight- © 2016 European Association of Geochemistry ened over the central and southern Italian peninsula. The Punic Wars marked the beginning of Rome’s imperial expansion and ended the time of Carthage. A glimpse into the Roman finances The First Punic War (264 BC–241 BC), conducted by a network of alliances in Sicily, ended up with Rome prevailing over Carthage. A consequence of this of the Second Punic War conflict was the Mercenary War (240 BC–237 BC) between Carthage and its through silver isotopes unpaid mercenaries, which Rome helped to quell, again at great cost to Carthage. Hostilities between the two cities resumed in 219 BC when Hannibal seized the F. Albarède1,2*, J. Blichert-Toft1,2, M. Rivoal1, P. Telouk1 Spanish city of Saguntum, a Roman ally. At the outbreak of the Second Punic War, Hannibal crossed the Alps into the Po plain and inflicted devastating mili- tary defeats on the Roman legions in a quick sequence of major battles, the Trebia (December 218 BC), Lake Trasimene (June 217 BC), and Cannae (August 216 BC). As a measure of the extent of the disaster, it was claimed that more than 100,000 Abstract doi: 10.7185/geochemlet.1613 Roman soldiers and Italian allies lost their lives in these three battles, including The defeat of Hannibal’s armies at the culmination of the Second Punic War (218 BC–201 three consuls.
  • 2007 Conference Papers

    2007 Conference Papers

    Volume19 Journalof the NumismaticAs soc ratron of Austraha 2007Conference Papers Coinage of the Libyan Revolt, 241–238 BC Stephen P Mulligan Historical background Mediterranean with control over Sardinia, The Libyan Revolt was a conflict western Sicily and the North African between Carthage and her former coast12. Carthage had her own military and mercenary army that lasted from 241 political classes such as the famous Barcid to 238 BC1-7. It is also known as the family (e.g. Hamilcar Barca and his son ‘Mercenary War’ or the ‘Truceless War’, Hannibal)13–14. The continuous use of the the latter reflecting the barbarity on both horse as an image on her coinage suggests a sides1,7. It occurred immediately after the strong equestrian and cavalry tradition prolonged First Punic-Roman War that within Punic society15–20. However, probably spanned 23 years from 264 to 241 BC, and due to her limited population and for simple that had taken place on land and sea commercial reasons, during much of her 8-11 around Sicily . history Carthage appears to have relied There are two sources of evidence for heavily on mercenary armies when the need the Libyan Revolt; the historical account arose21–22. This was particularly in the era in of Polybius1 and the numismatic evidence which she produced coinage, and there is an of the coins that were issued by the rebels. obvious link, because the most convenient Coins have a special symbolism in this method of payment for a mercenary army war, which began as a financial dispute was coinage. The mercenaries were drawn between a city of merchants, her from around the Carthaginian home- mercenary army and the heavily taxed land populated by native Libyans, who populace.
  • The Tyrannies in the Greek Cities of Sicily: 505-466 Bc

    The Tyrannies in the Greek Cities of Sicily: 505-466 Bc

    THE TYRANNIES IN THE GREEK CITIES OF SICILY: 505-466 BC MICHAEL JOHN GRIFFIN Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of Classics September 2005 The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Firstly, I would like to thank the Thomas and Elizabeth Williams Scholarship Fund (Loughor Schools District) for their financial assistance over the course of my studies. Their support has been crucial to my being able to complete this degree course. As for academic support, grateful thanks must go above all to my supervisor at the School of Classics, Dr. Roger Brock, whose vast knowledge has made a massive contribution not only to this thesis, but also towards my own development as an academic. I would also like to thank all other staff, both academic and clerical, during my time in the School of Classics for their help and support. Other individuals I would like to thank are Dr. Liam Dalton, Mr. Adrian Furse and Dr. Eleanor OKell, for all their input and assistance with my thesis throughout my four years in Leeds. Thanks also go to all the other various friends and acquaintances, both in Leeds and elsewhere, in particular the many postgraduate students who have given their support on a personal level as well as academically.
  • Alicante's Cultural Guide

    Alicante's Cultural Guide

    Table of Contents Country Profile: Spain ..................................................................................................................................1-6 Country Overview: History, Quick Facts, Government, Educational System…………………..........................................2-4 Alicante Overview: History, Quick Facts, Economy....................................................................................................4-6 Practical Information ...................................................................................................................................6-9 Making Phone Calls .......................................................................................................................................................6 Emergency Numbers .....................................................................................................................................................7 Handling Money...........................................................................................................................................................7-8 Weather........................................................................................................................................................................8-9 Being a North American Abroad .................................................................................................................9-12 Culture Shock..................................................................................................................................................................9
  • The Fleets of the First Punic War Author(S): W

    The Fleets of the First Punic War Author(S): W

    The Fleets of the First Punic War Author(s): W. W. Tarn Reviewed work(s): Source: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 27 (1907), pp. 48-60 Published by: The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/624404 . Accessed: 24/02/2013 08:32 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Hellenic Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded on Sun, 24 Feb 2013 08:32:00 AM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions THE FLEETS OF THE FIRST PUNIC WAR. ACCORDINGto Polybius, there took part in the battle of Ecnomus 680 quinqueremes and 290,000 men, i.e. crews 204,000 and troops 86,000; while in the next year, at the battle of the Hermaean promontory, 550 quiuqueremes were engaged. The only figures comparable to these in Roman history, manifest absurdities apart, are those given by Appian for the battle of Naulochus, and perhaps those for Actiumrn. At Naulochus 300 ships of all sizes are said to have been in action on either side, and no doubt Agrippa's fleet, at any rate, did amount to this large number1; while at Actium Octavian may have had anything up to 400.2 But in Octavian's time the population of all Italy may have been 7 to 8 millions 3; the Mediterranean was almost a Roman lake, and its entire resources went to furnish the fleets for the civil wars.
  • CALENDARS by David Le Conte

    CALENDARS by David Le Conte

    CALENDARS by David Le Conte This article was published in two parts, in Sagittarius (the newsletter of La Société Guernesiaise Astronomy Section), in July/August and September/October 1997. It was based on a talk given by the author to the Astronomy Section on 20 May 1997. It has been slightly updated to the date of this transcript, December 2007. Part 1 What date is it? That depends on the calendar used:- Gregorian calendar: 1997 May 20 Julian calendar: 1997 May 7 Jewish calendar: 5757 Iyyar 13 Islamic Calendar: 1418 Muharaim 13 Persian Calendar: 1376 Ordibehesht 30 Chinese Calendar: Shengxiao (Ox) Xin-You 14 French Rev Calendar: 205, Décade I Mayan Calendar: Long count 12.19.4.3.4 tzolkin = 2 Kan; haab = 2 Zip Ethiopic Calendar: 1990 Genbot 13 Coptic Calendar: 1713 Bashans 12 Julian Day: 2450589 Modified Julian Date: 50589 Day number: 140 Julian Day at 8.00 pm BST: 2450589.292 First, let us note the difference between calendars and time-keeping. The calendar deals with intervals of at least one day, while time-keeping deals with intervals less than a day. Calendars are based on astronomical movements, but they are primarily for social rather than scientific purposes. They are intended to satisfy the needs of society, for example in matters such as: agriculture, hunting. migration, religious and civil events. However, it has also been said that they do provide a link between man and the cosmos. There are about 40 calendars now in use. and there are many historical ones. In this article we will consider six principal calendars still in use, relating them to their historical background and astronomical foundation.
  • Title Page Echoes of the Salpinx: the Trumpet in Ancient Greek Culture

    Title Page Echoes of the Salpinx: the Trumpet in Ancient Greek Culture

    Title Page Echoes of the salpinx: the trumpet in ancient Greek culture. Carolyn Susan Bowyer. Royal Holloway, University of London. MPhil. 1 Declaration of Authorship I Carolyn Susan Bowyer hereby declare that this thesis and the work presented in it is entirely my own. Where I have consulted the work of others, this is always clearly stated. Signed: ______________________ Date: ________________________ 2 Echoes of the salpinx : the trumpet in ancient Greek culture. Abstract The trumpet from the 5th century BC in ancient Greece, the salpinx, has been largely ignored in modern scholarship. My thesis begins with the origins and physical characteristics of the Greek trumpet, comparing trumpets from other ancient cultures. I then analyse the sounds made by the trumpet, and the emotions caused by these sounds, noting the growing sophistication of the language used by Greek authors. In particular, I highlight its distinctively Greek association with the human voice. I discuss the range of signals and instructions given by the trumpet on the battlefield, demonstrating a developing technical vocabulary in Greek historiography. In my final chapter, I examine the role of the trumpet in peacetime, playing its part in athletic competitions, sacrifice, ceremonies, entertainment and ritual. The thesis re-assesses and illustrates the significant and varied roles played by the trumpet in Greek culture. 3 Echoes of the salpinx : the trumpet in ancient Greek culture Title page page 1 Declaration of Authorship page 2 Abstract page 3 Table of Contents pages
  • Calendar of Roman Events

    Calendar of Roman Events

    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
  • Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean Culture

    Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean Culture

    ANTONIJE SHKOKLJEV SLAVE NIKOLOVSKI - KATIN PREHISTORY CENTRAL BALKANS CRADLE OF AEGEAN CULTURE Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture By Antonije Shkokljev Slave Nikolovski – Katin Translated from Macedonian to English and edited By Risto Stefov Prehistory - Central Balkans Cradle of Aegean culture Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2013 by Antonije Shkokljev, Slave Nikolovski – Katin & Risto Stefov e-book edition 2 Index Index........................................................................................................3 COMMON HISTORY AND FUTURE ..................................................5 I - GEOGRAPHICAL CONFIGURATION OF THE BALKANS.........8 II - ARCHAEOLOGICAL DISCOVERIES .........................................10 III - EPISTEMOLOGY OF THE PANNONIAN ONOMASTICS.......11 IV - DEVELOPMENT OF PALEOGRAPHY IN THE BALKANS....33 V – THRACE ........................................................................................37 VI – PREHISTORIC MACEDONIA....................................................41 VII - THESSALY - PREHISTORIC AEOLIA.....................................62 VIII – EPIRUS – PELASGIAN TESPROTIA......................................69
  • Ancient Rome – Wars and Battles the Ancient Romans Fought Many Battles and Wars in Order to Expand and Protect Their Empire

    Ancient Rome – Wars and Battles the Ancient Romans Fought Many Battles and Wars in Order to Expand and Protect Their Empire

    Ancient Rome – Wars and Battles The Ancient Romans fought many battles and wars in order to expand and protect their empire. There were also civil wars where Romans fought Romans in order to gain power. Here are some of the major battles and wars that the Romans fought. The Punic Wars The Punic Wars were fought between Rome and Carthage from 264 BC to 146 BC. Carthage was a large City located on the coast of North Africa. This sounds like a long way away at first, but Carthage was just a short sea voyage from Rome across the Mediterranean Sea. Both cities were major powers at the time and both were expanding their empires. As the empires grew, they began to clash and soon war had begun. There were three major parts of the Punic wars and they were fought over the course of more than 100 years, First Punic War (264 - 241 BC): The First Punic War was fought largely over the island of Sicily. This meant a lot of the fighting was at sea where Carthage had the advantage of a much stronger navy than Rome. However, Rome quickly built up a large navy of over 100 ships. Rome also invented the corvus, a type of assault bridge that allowed Rome's superior soldiers to board enemy navy vessels. Rome soon dominated Carthage and won the war. Second Punic War (218 - 201 BC): In the Second Punic War, Carthage had more success fighting against the Roman legions. The Carthage leader and general, Hannibal, made a daring crossing of the Alps to attack Rome and northern Italy.