DOCSLIB.ORG

Cove Fire Salvage and Restoration Project Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cove Fire Salvage and Restoration Project Environmental Assessment United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Cove Fire Salvage and Restoration Project Environmental Assessment Big Valley Ranger District, Modoc National Forest, Modoc County, CA April 2018 For More Information Contact: Chris Christofferson, District Ranger Big Valley Ranger District, Modoc National Forest 505 South Main Street PO Box 159 Adin, CCA 96006 Phone: 530-299-3215 Email: [email protected] Fax: 530-299-8409 Cover photo: Area of high-intensity fire and 100% mortality within the Cove Fire Salvage and Restoration Project Area. (photo taken by Garrett Costello, December 19, 2017) U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication for program information (e.g. Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) please contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................................ i Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Proposed Project Location .......................................................................................................... 1 Background ................................................................................................................................. 1 Purpose and Need for the Proposal ............................................................................................. 4 Public Involvement and Tribal Consultation ................................................................................... 7 Issues Analysis and Alternative Development ............................................................................ 7 Decision to be Made ................................................................................................................... 8 Alternative 1: Proposed Action ................................................................................................... 9 Area Salvage Harvest .............................................................................................................. 9 Roadside Hazard Tree Removal ............................................................................................ 10 Fuel Treatments ..................................................................................................................... 12 Reforestation ......................................................................................................................... 12 Transportation Management .................................................................................................. 13 Integrated Design Features .................................................................................................... 15 Alternative 2: No Action ........................................................................................................... 21 Environmental Impacts of the Proposed Action and Alternatives................................................. 22 Air Quality ................................................................................................................................ 23 Alternative 1 .......................................................................................................................... 23 Alternative 2 .......................................................................................................................... 23 Botanical Resources .................................................................................................................. 23 Noxious Weeds ...................................................................................................................... 23 Region 5 Sensitive Plant Species .......................................................................................... 24 Threatened and Endangered Plant Species ............................................................................ 25 Cultural Resources .................................................................................................................... 25 Alternative 1 .......................................................................................................................... 25 Alternative 2 .......................................................................................................................... 26 Fire and Fuels ............................................................................................................................ 26 Alternative 1 .......................................................................................................................... 26 Alternative 2 .......................................................................................................................... 27 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................. 28 Alternative 1 .......................................................................................................................... 28 Alternative 2 .......................................................................................................................... 31 Range ........................................................................................................................................ 32 Alternative 1 .......................................................................................................................... 32 Alternative 2 .......................................................................................................................... 33 Recreation and Visual Resources .............................................................................................. 35 Alternative 1 .......................................................................................................................... 35 Alternative 2 .......................................................................................................................... 35 Silviculture ................................................................................................................................ 36 Alternative 1 .......................................................................................................................... 36 Alternative 2 .......................................................................................................................... 37 Socioeconomics ........................................................................................................................ 38 Alternative 1 .......................................................................................................................... 38 Alternative 2 .......................................................................................................................... 39 Soils ........................................................................................................................................... 40 Alternative 1 .......................................................................................................................... 40 Alternative 2 .......................................................................................................................... 41 i Terrestrial and Aquatic Wildlife Resources .............................................................................. 42 Migratory Landbirds .............................................................................................................. 42 Management Indicator Species (MIS) ................................................................................... 43 Threatened, Endangered, and Sensitive (TES) Wildlife Species .......................................... 51 Transportation ........................................................................................................................... 67 Alternative 1 .......................................................................................................................... 67 Alternative 2 .......................................................................................................................... 68 References ................................................................................................................................. 69 Appendix A: Past, Ongoing and Reasonably Foreseeable Future Actions Summary Cove Fire Salvage and Restoration Project Analysis Area ........................................................................ 72 Appendix B: Supplemental Black-backed Woodpecker Information ...................................... 75 List of Tables Table 1. Number of acres and percent area burned by basal area mortality
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wildland Fire in Ecosystems: Effects of Fire on Fauna
    United States Department of Agriculture Wildland Fire in Forest Service Rocky Mountain Ecosystems Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42- volume 1 Effects of Fire on Fauna January 2000 Abstract _____________________________________ Smith, Jane Kapler, ed. 2000. Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on fauna. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 1. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 83 p. Fires affect animals mainly through effects on their habitat. Fires often cause short-term increases in wildlife foods that contribute to increases in populations of some animals. These increases are moderated by the animals’ ability to thrive in the altered, often simplified, structure of the postfire environment. The extent of fire effects on animal communities generally depends on the extent of change in habitat structure and species composition caused by fire. Stand-replacement fires usually cause greater changes in the faunal communities of forests than in those of grasslands. Within forests, stand- replacement fires usually alter the animal community more dramatically than understory fires. Animal species are adapted to survive the pattern of fire frequency, season, size, severity, and uniformity that characterized their habitat in presettlement times. When fire frequency increases or decreases substantially or fire severity changes from presettlement patterns, habitat for many animal species declines. Keywords: fire effects, fire management, fire regime, habitat, succession, wildlife The volumes in “The Rainbow Series” will be published during the year 2000. To order, check the box or boxes below, fill in the address form, and send to the mailing address listed below.
    [Show full text]
  • The View from Here
    The View from Here Figure 1 -- The iconic image of the South Canyon Fire blow-up that will claim the lives of 14 wildland firefighters. Acknowledging our current culture and its shortcomings while using its strengths to lead change. December 2018 The View from Here 1 This collection represents collective insight into how we operate and why we must alter some of our most ingrained practices and perspectives. Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3 I Risk ................................................................................................................................................ 4 1. The Illusion of Control ............................................................................................................. 5 2. It’s Going to Happen Again ................................................................................................... 14 3. The Big Lie – Honor the Fallen .............................................................................................. 19 4. The Problem with Zero ......................................................................................................... 26 5. RISK, GAIN, and LOSS – What are We Willing to Accept? .................................................... 29 6. How Do We Know This Job is Dangerous? ............................................................................ 39 II Culture .......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Redding Interagency Hotshot Crew Leadership Development Program
    Redding Interagency Hotshot Crew Leadership Development Program 2017 Program Description and Accomplishment Report Table of Contents Introduction 3 General Information Mission Statement 4 Recruitment and Qualifications 5 Historical Information 7 Overhead Roster 10 Home Unit Representation Summary 11 Training Synopsis 12 Fire Assignments 13 Fire Job Specialty Assignments 14 Physical Conditioning 14 Performance Evaluation 15 2017 Accomplishment Report 16 2017 Redding IHC Roster 17 2017 Redding IHC Training Summary 18 2017 Instructor/Program Support List 19 2017 Redding IHC Fire Assignment Trainee Summary 20 2017 Redding IHC Incident Record 21 Christopher Bavetta 22 Devon Brito 22 Brian Carter 23 Kyle Crawford 23 Casey Dunn 24 Brandon Hall 24 Benjamin Hobbs 25 Thuc Van Kha 25 Isaac Obst 26 Justin O’Keefe 26 Indalecio Perez 27 Fermin Sanchez 27 Patrick Stevenson 28 Andrew Zwolinski 28 2 Introduction This guide is prepared and distributed annually to provide Fire Management and field going personnel a detailed description of the operating procedures and annual accomplishments of the Redding Interagency Hotshot Crew (IHC) Leadership Development Program. It is also designed to serve as an information source, which an individual can use to learn more about the Redding IHC Leadership Development Program and determine how he or she could best qualify and participate in the program. Redding IHC preparing for firing operations on the Parker 2 Fire, August 2017 Graduates of the program are part of a proud tradition. Since 1967, the Redding IHC has established a distinguished record in every major campaign they have taken part in. Redding Hotshots are people who want something extra from their careers and people who want to take on the toughest challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • FIN Pg.1 January 8, 2018
    FIN Pg.1 January 8, 2018 FIN Pg.2 January 8, 2018 FIN Pg.3 Agenda Item #2 January 8, 2018 FIN Pg.4 January 8, 2018 FIN Pg.5 MONTECITO FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT CASH RECONCILIATION - ALL FUNDS October 31, 2017 Fund 3650 Fund 3651 Fund 3652 Fund 3653 General Pension Obl. Capital Res. Land & Bldg All Funds Cash Balance at 10/1/17 1,561,179.41 102,976.06 2,659,745.58 5,360,247.92 9,684,148.97 Income: Tax Revenue 765,803.27 - - - 765,803.27 Interest income 9,653.91 254.06 6,611.43 13,326.56 29,845.96 Other: CalOES - Sand Fire, 7/24-7/25/17 3,623.25 - - - 3,623.25 CalOES - Elm 2 Fire, 5/18-5/21/17 28,613.55 - - - 28,613.55 CalOES - Hill Fire, 6/26-6/27/17 11,879.94 - - - 11,879.94 EMS Mgmt LLC, First response pmt 25,389.65 - - - 25,389.65 Witness fee for Fire Marshal 279.51 - - - 279.51 Cal Card rebate, Q2 708.97 - - - 708.97 SY Pharmacy donation 500.00 - - - 500.00 Community member donation 1,000.00 - - - 1,000.00 847,452.05 254.06 6,611.43 13,326.56 867,644.10 Expenses: Warrants and Claims (104,801.23) - (40,471.70) (63.00) (145,335.93) Payroll (1,274,032.09) - - - (1,274,032.09) Other: Interfund Transfers - - - - - Reimbursed expenses* 11,673.78 - - - 11,673.78 (1,367,159.54) - (40,471.70) (63.00) (1,407,694.24) Cash Balance at 10/31/17 1,041,471.92 103,230.12 2,625,885.31 5,373,511.48 9,144,098.83 Cash in Treasury per Balance Sheet 1,724,766.40 103,230.12 2,625,885.31 5,373,511.48 9,827,393.31 Difference to reconcile 683,294.48 - - - 683,294.48 Reconciliation: Outstanding payroll payments CalPERS retirement contribution (11/1) 87,094.44 - - - 87,094.44 Mass Mutual contribution (11/1) 19,715.00 - - - 19,715.00 Payroll deposit (11/1) 487,642.21 - - - 487,642.21 EFT Payable (Acct 1015) Montecito Firefighter's Association 6,955.50 - - - 6,955.50 CalPERS retirement contribution (10/16) 80,418.02 - - - 80,418.02 Accounts Payable (Acct 1210) Life Assist 1,469.31 - - - 1,469.31 683,294.48 - - - 683,294.48 * Summary of reimbursed expenses: Conexis flexible spending account refund (10/13/17) Conexis flexible spending account refunds (3/2017), $166.70 MERRAG reimb.
    [Show full text]
  • Computational Modeling of Extreme Wildland Fire Events
    Computational modeling of extreme wildland fire events: a synthesis of scientific understanding with applications to forecasting, land management, and firefighter safety Janice L. Coena,b W. Schroederc S Conwayd L Tarnaye a National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado b Corresponding author. [email protected] c NOAA/NESDIS/OSPO/SPSD, College Park, MD d Conway Conservation Group, Incline Village, NV e USDA Forest Service, Region 5 Remote Sensing Laboratory, McClellan, CA ACCEPTED Journal of Computational Science Formal publication location: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2020.101152 1 Abstract The understanding and prediction of large wildland fire events around the world is a growing interdisciplinary research area advanced rapidly by development and use of computational models. Recent models bidirectionally couple computational fluid dynamics models including weather prediction models with modules containing algorithms representing fire spread and heat release, simulating fire-atmosphere interactions across scales spanning three orders of magnitude. Integrated with weather data and airborne and satellite remote sensing data on wildland fuels and active fire detection, modern coupled weather-fire modeling systems are being used to solve current science problems. Compared to legacy tools, these dynamic computational modeling systems increase cost and complexity but have produced breakthrough insights notably into the mechanisms underlying extreme wildfire events such as fine-scale extreme winds associated with interruptions of the electricity grid and have been configured to forecast a fire's growth, expanding our ability to anticipate how they will unfold. We synthesize case studies of recent extreme events, expanding applications, and the challenges and limitations in our remote sensing systems, fire prediction tools, and meteorological models that add to wildfires' mystery and apparent unpredictability.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2015 FIRESCOPE Bod Minutes
    FIRESCOPE CAL OES FIRE AND RESCUE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FIRESCOPE BOARD OF DIRECTORS Cal OES HQ 3650 Schriever Ave. Mather, CA 95655 October 14, 2015 @ 0900 Members Present Daryl Osby – Chairperson, FIRESCOPE Board of Directors, Los Angeles County Fire Department William Metcalf – Vice-Chairperson FIRESCOPE Board of Directors, Fire Districts, South Mark Ghilarducci – California Governor’s Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), Director Dan Kleinman – (representing Shawna Legarza)U.S. Forest Service (USFS) Mike Esparza – California State Firefighters Association (CSFA) Lou Paulson – California Professional Firefighters (CPF) Eric Peterson – Santa Barbara County Fire Department Ken Kehmna – County Fire Departments, North Mike Richwine - (representing Tonya Hoover) State Fire Marshall (SFM) Thom Porter – (representing Ken Pimlott) CAL FIRE Kim Zagaris – Cal OES Fire and Rescue Division Brian Marshall – Kern County Fire Authority Jeff Bowman – Orange County Fire Authority Jeff Meston – City Fire Departments, North Mark Lorenzen – Ventura County Fire Department Richard Webb – Linda Fire Protection District Mario Rueda –(representing Ralph Terrazas) Los Angeles City Fire Department Sam Marouk – U.S. Dept. of Interior (DOI), Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Steve Kovacs – Volunteer Fire Departments Guests Present Steve Winter – Ventura County Fire Andy Ortega – Ventura County Fire Shawn Fraley – Kern County Fire Mark Hartwig – San Bernardino County Fire Ron Phillips – City of Folsom Fire Department Mike Hebrard – Region III Coordinator, CAL FIRE Ralph Domanski – Cal OES Fire and Rescue Division Mike Lococo – Cal OES Fire and Rescue Division Scott Vail, Cal OES Fire and Rescue Division Chad Stokes – Cal OES Fire and Rescue Division 1. Welcome, Introductions, Logistics - Meeting Begins @ 0930 (Osby) Chairperson Chief Osby calls meeting to order @ 0930.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 California Forest Health Highlights
    2015 California Forest Health Highlights A publication of the California Forest Pest Council TABLE OF CONTENTS Environmental Conditions 2 Aerial Detection Survey 3 Bark Beetles and Wood Borers 3 Defoliators 4 Diseases 4 Insect Conditions 5 Native Insects 5 Defoliators 8 Other Species 8 Invasive Insects 10 Forest Diseases and Abiotic Conditions 12 Abiotic Diseases and Complexes 12 Native Diseases 14 Exotic Diseases 15 Invasive Plants 18 New Pest Management Practices Available Soon 18 New or Newly Naturalized Invasive Plant Species in California 18 California Forest Pest Council 19 Contributors 20 VISIT US ON THE WEB: HTTP://CAFORESTPESTCOUNCIL.ORG/ Environmental Conditions Page 2 California experienced a fourth consecutive year of below-average precipitation in 2015. Most rainfall occurred from October 2014 to February 2015 (water years are from October 1 – September 30), with only 6.1 in. of the total 36.8 in. of precipitation falling in northern California the last 8 months of the year. The statewide snowpack was also well below normal, at 5 percent of average. Mean monthly temperatures reachedU.S. record Drought or near record Monitor highs in January, February, March, and June,April making 29,2015 2014the hottest year on record for the state. In northern California (in the central and eastern portion), June temperatures(Released Thursday,were 5 to May.7 degrees 1, 2014) warmer than historical averages, with Californiaareas such as Redding experiencing 17 days over 100 °F. High temperaturesValid 8 a.m. EDT continued through July and into late summer. The prolonged drought, over-stocked forests, and higher than average temperatures were the most significant factors affecting California forest health in 2015, with nearly 28 million dead trees mapped during US Forest Service forest health aerial surveys.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Fire in Ecosystems: Effects of Fire on Flora
    United States Department of Agriculture Wildland Fire in Forest Service Rocky Mountain Ecosystems Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42- volume 2 Effects of Fire on Flora December 2000 Abstract _____________________________________ Brown, James K.; Smith, Jane Kapler, eds. 2000. Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on flora. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 2. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 257 p. This state-of-knowledge review about the effects of fire on flora and fuels can assist land managers with ecosystem and fire management planning and in their efforts to inform others about the ecological role of fire. Chapter topics include fire regime classification, autecological effects of fire, fire regime characteristics and postfire plant community developments in ecosystems throughout the United States and Canada, global climate change, ecological principles of fire regimes, and practical considerations for managing fire in an ecosytem context. Keywords: ecosystem, fire effects, fire management, fire regime, fire severity, fuels, habitat, plant response, plants, succession, vegetation The volumes in “The Rainbow Series” will be published from 2000 through 2001. To order, check the box or boxes below, fill in the address form, and send to the mailing address listed below. Or send your order and your address in mailing label form to one of the other listed media. Your order(s) will be filled as the volumes are published. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 1. Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on fauna. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 2. Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on flora.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Fire in Ecosystems: Effects of Fire on Fauna
    United States Department of Agriculture Wildland Fire in Forest Service Rocky Mountain Ecosystems Research Station General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-42- volume 1 Effects of Fire on Fauna January 2000 Abstract _____________________________________ Smith, Jane Kapler, ed. 2000. Wildland fire in ecosystems: effects of fire on fauna. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 1. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 83 p. Fires affect animals mainly through effects on their habitat. Fires often cause short-term increases in wildlife foods that contribute to increases in populations of some animals. These increases are moderated by the animals’ ability to thrive in the altered, often simplified, structure of the postfire environment. The extent of fire effects on animal communities generally depends on the extent of change in habitat structure and species composition caused by fire. Stand-replacement fires usually cause greater changes in the faunal communities of forests than in those of grasslands. Within forests, stand- replacement fires usually alter the animal community more dramatically than understory fires. Animal species are adapted to survive the pattern of fire frequency, season, size, severity, and uniformity that characterized their habitat in presettlement times. When fire frequency increases or decreases substantially or fire severity changes from presettlement patterns, habitat for many animal species declines. Keywords: fire effects, fire management, fire regime, habitat, succession, wildlife The volumes in “The Rainbow Series” will be published during the year 2000. To order, check the box or boxes below, fill in the address form, and send to the mailing address listed below.
    [Show full text]
  • National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Weekend October 8-9, 2016
    Remembering ver in Our Hea Fore rts ® National Fallen Firefighters Memorial Weekend Weekend Memorial Firefighters Fallen National 2016 ® National Fallen Firefighters Foundation Post Office Drawer 498 National Fallen Firefighters Emmitsburg, Maryland 21727 Memorial Weekend 301.447.1365 • 301.447.1645 fax www.firehero.org • [email protected] October 8-9, 2016 Raymond G. Araujo Jr. • Richard D. Arazosa • Sheldon Barocas • Dwight “BB” Bazile • Raymond G. Araujo Jr. • Richard D. Arazosa • Sheldon Barocas • Dwight “BB” Bazile • Michael G. Behette • Séan M. Benson Sr. • Christopher M. Blankenship • Jeffrey Scott Michael G. Behette • Séan M. Benson Sr. • Christopher M. Blankenship • Jeffrey Scott Buck Jr. • Steven R. Burroughs • Richard J. Cano • Daniel V. Capuano • Scott D. Carroll Buck Jr. • Steven R. Burroughs • Richard J. Cano • Daniel V. Capuano • Scott D. Carroll • John J. Cassidy • Jerry “Bear” Celecki • Roy W. Chelsen • Zachary Chase Clevenger • • John J. Cassidy • Jerry “Bear” Celecki • Roy W. Chelsen • Zachary Chase Clevenger • Shane Michael Clifton • Steven W. Cobb • Floyd E. Coon • Michael “Coop” Cooper • Shane Michael Clifton • Steven W. Cobb • Floyd E. Coon • Michael “Coop” Cooper • John K. Corcoran • Michael B. Corn • Stacy A. Crawford • Richard L. Crosby Sr. • Terry John K. Corcoran • Michael B. Corn • Stacy A. Crawford • Richard L. Crosby Sr. • Terry Culver • Christopher J. Daniels • Kevin M. Delano Sr. • John J. Doster • Jason Eric Farley Culver • Christopher J. Daniels • Kevin M. Delano Sr. • John J. Doster • Jason Eric Farley • Leslie W. “Les” Fryman • Martin T. Fullam • John T. Gallagher • Daryl Eugene Gordon • Leslie W. “Les” Fryman • Martin T. Fullam • John T. Gallagher • Daryl Eugene Gordon • Dwight “Hed” Greer • Timothy T.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Requirements for Simulating Wildland Fire Behavior Using Insight from Coupled Weather—Wildland Fire Models
    fire Review Some Requirements for Simulating Wildland Fire Behavior Using Insight from Coupled Weather—Wildland Fire Models Janice Coen ID National Center for Atmospheric Research, P.O. Box 3000, Boulder, CO 80301, USA; [email protected]; Tel.: +1-303-497-8986 Received: 29 December 2017; Accepted: 6 February 2018; Published: 9 February 2018 Abstract: A newer generation of models that interactively couple the atmosphere with fire behavior have shown an increased potential to understand and predict complex, rapidly changing fire behavior. This is possible if they capture intricate, time-varying microscale airflows in mountainous terrain and fire-atmosphere feedbacks. However, this benefit is counterbalanced by additional limitations and requirements, many arising from the atmospheric model upon which they are built. The degree to which their potential is realized depends on how coupled models are built, configured, and applied. Because these are freely available to users with widely ranging backgrounds, I present some limitations and requirements that must be understood and addressed to achieve meaningful fire behavior simulation results. These include how numerical weather prediction models are formulated for specific scales, their solution methods and numerical approximations, optimal model configurations for common scenarios, and how these factors impact reproduction of fire events and phenomena. I discuss methods used to adjust inadequate outcomes and advise on critical interpretation of fire modeling results, such as where errors from model limitations may be misinterpreted as natural unpredictability. I discuss impacts on other weather model-based applications that affect understanding of fire behavior and effects. Keywords: community models; coupled atmosphere-fire model; numerical weather prediction; fire model; CAWFE; WRF 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Fire Management Strategies
    GGNRA Fire Management Plan Page 19 CHAPTER 2 – FIRE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES 2. FIRE MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES 2.1 FIRE MANAGEMENT GOALS As part of the NEPA process for the FMP, GGNRA staff developed goals for the overall fire management program based on guidance from Federal Wildland Fire Management Policy, NPS Management Policies, Director’s Order #18, and other fire-related guidance documents, in conjunction with public input from meetings and workshops. In the listing below, elements of the adopted FMP alternative are paired with the seven FMP goals to demonstrate how the selected alternative will help the park achieve the goals of the FMP. Goal 1. Ensure that firefighter and public safety is the highest priority for all fire management activities. Objectives: √ In cooperation with Bay Area Network Parks, provide the fire management workforce with the training, equipment, operating procedures, safety measures, and information needed to manage risks and carry out their activities safely. √ Ensure that all fire management employees meet the Interagency Qualification Standards for their positions and those held while assigned to an incident. √ Identify, inform, and protect visitors, communities, park partners, and other groups and individuals that potentially would be affected by fire management activities. √ Comply with the National Wildfire Coordinating Group and agency medical standards and fitness requirements for staff and make sure staff has personal protective equipment appropriate to the job or assignment. √ Follow all aviation policies and practices during fire management activities. The fire management officer or designee will stay abreast of aviation policy changes by maintaining periodic contact with the regional aviation manager and the designated park Aviation Officer.
    [Show full text]