DOCSLIB.ORG

Essays in the Philosophy Of

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Essays in the Philosophy Of ESSAYS IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF HUMANISM Volume 21 (1) ~ 2013 A journal of the American Humanist Association ESSAYS IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF HUMANISM Volume 21 (1), 2013 The American Humanist Association Washington, DC Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism John R. Shook, Editor Editorial Board A. C. Grayling New College of the Humanities, UK Alistair J. Sinclair Centre for Dualist Studies, Scotland Arthur Caplan New York University, USA Cathy Legg University of Waikato, New Zealand Charlene Haddock Seigfried Purdue University, USA Franz de Waal Emory University, USA Greg Epstein Harvard University, USA James Giordano Georgetown University, USA Jennifer Michael Hecht New York, USA Jonathan Moreno University of Pennsylvania, USA Judy Walker Colorado, USA Louise Antony University of Massachusetts, USA Marian Hillar Founding Editor of EPH, Houston Humanists, USA Michael Shermer The Skeptics Society, USA Owen Flanagan Duke University, USA Patricia Churchland University of California, San Diego, USA Peter Derkx University of Humanistic Studies, The Netherlands Philip Kitcher Columbia University, USA Rebecca Newberger Goldstein Massachusetts, USA Sharon Welch Meadville Theological Seminary, USA Sikivu Hutchinson LA County Commission on Human Relations, USA Stan Van Hooft Deakin University, Australia Stephen Law University of London, UK Stephen Pinker Harvard University, USA Susan B. Hansen University of Pittsburgh, USA Tony Pinn Rice University, USA Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal published twice a year by the American Humanist Association. We invite authors to submit papers concerning philosophical, historical, or interdisciplinary aspects of humanism, or that deal with the application of humanist principles to current social issues and problems of everyday life. Authors should consult the Humanist Manifesto III and the AHA’s positions on the nature and principles of humanism, available at www.americanhumanist.org. Submissions go to [email protected]. Visit our website www.essaysinhumanism.org to subscribe, see past issues, and read additional guidelines for authors. Please call 800-837- 3792 for assistance with subscriptions and changing a mailing address. (c) Copyright 2013 American Humanist Association, 1777 T St. NW, Washington, DC 20009 ISSN 1522-7340 EPH Contents volume 21, number 1, 2013 ARTICLES 1 Evolutionary Ethics and Its Future Robert D. Finch 13 Pragmatism and the Contribution of Neuroscience to Ethics Eric Racine 31 Ingersoll’s Voice, Adler’s Vision: Motivating Humanists James Croft 49 For the Love: The Amateur Humanist Intellectual Christopher J. Kazanjian 65 Utopian Visions and the American Dream Frederic March 83 Urban Sprawl and Existentialism in Thomas Pynchon’s The Crying of Lot 49 Tracy J. Prince 95 Are We Post-Secular? Bill Cooke HUMANIST REFLECTIONS 107 Atheism... Plus What? Richard Carrier 117 Need Humanism Be Reasonable Joseph Chuman Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism The American Humanist Association vol. 21, no. 1 (2013), 1–11 © 2013 Evolutionary Ethics and Its Future Robert D. Finch Dr. Robert Finch is professor emeritus of mechanical engineering, University of Houston. He is past president of the Humanists of Houston, and served on the AHA’s Board of Directors. Historically humans have evolved by the addition of abilities to our behavioral repertoire. Values first developed in the time of the hunter gatherers featuring such traits as strength, bravery and endurance. Men and women often stressed different values. With the advent of civilization values began to include benevolence, fairness and then the growth of knowledge, natural sciences, engineering, medicine and law. Modern humanist ethics began with the work of Hume and the utilitarians. Early humanist ethical systems stressed individual responsibility and the use of social principles. Our principles have evolved through the exercise of reason, by scientific investigation, strategic planning and by including a sense of commitment. Humanism is to be found in a variety of institutions stressing different values, theories and strategic plans. Furthermore humanism is not a finished product, so that the expanding circle of the membership contemplates an evolving set of principles, as well as continuing narratives of our progress. We conclude that there is no quintessential humanist. How then should we strive to improve our definitions, manifestos, practices, reasoning and narratives? 1. Introduction I have been interested in the subject of humanist ethics for some years. I am beginning to see a complete picture now which I hope to sketch for you today, although I still sense gaps in my knowledge which need to be filled in. Ethics is a wide subject and perhaps the most important one in Humanism. Moral inquiry in the West began with Protagoras, Epicurus, Socrates, Plato and other Greek philosophers. Modern humanist ethics began with the work of Hume and the utilitarians. Early humanist ethical systems stressed individual responsibility and the use of social principles. Our principles have evolved through the exercise of reason, by scientific investigation, strategic planning and by including a sense of commitment. Humanism is to be found in a variety of institutions stressing different values, theories and strategic plans. Furthermore humanism is not a finished product, so that the expanding circle of the membership contemplates an evolving set of principles, as well as continuing narratives of our progress. Everyone has a unique morality and ethology, and we conclude 2 ROBERT D. FINCH that there is no single quintessential humanist. To improve our definitions, manifestos, practices, reasoning and narratives we are obliged to evolve, to plan, and to respond as contingencies arise. The inspiration for this research struck me some time ago when the new atheists were in vogue. The new atheists of course were Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, and Christopher Hitchens, all of whom had recently written books denying the existence of God. It occurred to me that a consequence of this spate of activity was that there would be a renewed need for books on non-theistic ethics. I had been writing a series of essays for our Houston Humanist and Freethought Newsletter on the very subject of ethics, and I am now turning these essays into a collection for publication. After a while the news came out that Sam Harris had produced a new book, The Moral Landscape, which seemed to confirm my prediction. There have also been several other new works on ethics published in recent months. 2. The Scope of Humanist Ethics It seems to me that the scope of ethics is really very wide, as I have tried to bring out with such questions as: • What is honorable conduct? • How do we watch our manners? • How should we behave? • What should we do? say? think? learn? • Whom, and what precepts, should we obey? • How should we examine and plan our lives? • How should we criticize others or offer constructive ideas? • How should we acquire knowledge of natural and human systems? In other words, I am arguing that ethics includes all our behavior, i.e. everything we do, say, think, plan, research and learn. Humanist ethics is a limited subset of everything humans do. I advocate a humanistic ethics sharing the following characteristics: It is evolutionary (inspired by Charles Darwin, Julian Huxley, Edward O. Wilson). It is atheistic (or Nietzschean vs Christian). It is part of Ethology (i.e., of the study of animal behavior). It is part of Sociology (inspired by Auguste Comte, Talcott Parsons, and James Q. Wilson). It includes such topics as conscience, manners, honor, planning, and morals. Evolutionary Ethics and Its Future 3 It includes some instinctive behavior which has survival value today (fear, food, shelter and sex), although there are other instincts we could probably do without nowadays. It includes humanistic behavior based on both emotion and reason (think both of David Hume and Immanuel Kant). It includes values and social systems which may be regarded as both measures and structures. It involves situational assessments and modifications of behavior which may be used to eliminate problems. It may include instincts, values, and principles to suit different situations. It requires humanists to constitute ethical communities. And, finally, it should be forward looking, as we learn, evolve, and find new visions for the future. The non-theist’s basis for ethical thinking does not include divine sanctions or supernatural revelations. The basis of our ethical knowledge is subjective emotion and meaning and our best understanding of the natural world, which we could call truth. Objective knowledge is what we can share with other people through language, reason, logic, and mathematics. Hence we have built up natural science and cosmology, biology, psychology, and social theory. We use the same cognitive tools in art, and in inventing systems for business and economics. Finally, we see ethics as part of the practical panoply of politics and law, and of the engineered world. We expand on humanist ethical thinking by considering possible behavior and situations, in relation to our naturalist worldview. Our individual lives are controlled by our brains. The subjective part of our behavior is governed by emotions. Plants do not have emotions. It is only members of the animal kingdom who need instinctive direction for their behavior. It was only a few hundred years ago that people still believed thought was centered in the heart. And even after the brain came to be recognized as important, people still believed in the existence of a soul which they supposed departed the body at the time of death. We now know that our mental existence is the proper province of psychology and cognitive science. Our lifestances are governed by instinct, psychology, ethics, and individual management. 3. Basic Drives Consider the complexities of the behavior of animals as they move around to satisfy needs for breathing, nutrition, reproduction, fleeing from danger, finding shelter, and so forth. Biologists tell us that animals have various urges based on chemical potentials associated 4 ROBERT D.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • HUMANISM Religious Practices
    HUMANISM Religious Practices . Required Daily Observances . Required Weekly Observances . Required Occasional Observances/Holy Days Religious Items . Personal Religious Items . Congregate Religious Items . Searches Requirements for Membership . Requirements (Includes Rites of Conversion) . Total Membership Medical Prohibitions Dietary Standards Burial Rituals . Death . Autopsies . Mourning Practices Sacred Writings Organizational Structure . Headquarters Location . Contact Office/Person History Theology 1 Religious Practices Required Daily Observance No required daily observances. Required Weekly Observance No required weekly observances, but many Humanists find fulfillment in congregating with other Humanists on a weekly basis (especially those who characterize themselves as Religious Humanists) or other regular basis for social and intellectual engagement, discussions, book talks, lectures, and similar activities. Required Occasional Observances No required occasional observances, but some Humanists (especially those who characterize themselves as Religious Humanists) celebrate life-cycle events with baby naming, coming of age, and marriage ceremonies as well as memorial services. Even though there are no required observances, there are several days throughout the calendar year that many Humanists consider holidays. They include (but are not limited to) the following: February 12. Darwin Day: This marks the birthday of Charles Darwin, whose research and findings in the field of biology, particularly his theory of evolution by natural selection, represent a breakthrough in human knowledge that Humanists celebrate. First Thursday in May. National Day of Reason: This day acknowledges the importance of reason, as opposed to blind faith, as the best method for determining valid conclusions. June 21 - Summer Solstice. This day is also known as World Humanist Day and is a celebration of the longest day of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • Parties Groups with Answers.Pdf
    Parties/Groups Quiz MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choooe the one altunatlve that best S) Lobbying includes all of the following completes the ltatemeot or ....,... the question. EXCEPT I) African Americans, women, and people A) mounting advertising campaigns to with no college education tend lo be alert the public about an issue A) Republicans B) hosting receptions and special events B) Democrats for members of Congress C) Independents C) approaching members of Congress D) Socialists as they walk through the Capitol E) Libertarians D) telephone calls to members of Congress E) scheduled face-to-face meetings with 2) Whites, men, and people with some college education tend to be members of Congress A) Independents B) Socialists 6) What role does the majority party C) Democrats undertake in legislatures at all levels? D) Libertarians A) Leading oversight and criticism of El Republicans ruling-party policies BJ Electing the legislature's leaders C) Making commitlee assignments 3) Political parties do all of the following D) Electing legislative leaders, making EXCEPT committee assignments, and holding A) campaigning for candidates BJ identifying potential candidates the majority on committees E) Holding a majority on committees C) identifying a narrow issue concern DJ organizing elections El nominating candidates to run for 7) Federalist 10 suggests that the framers of the office Constitution were: A) in favor of strong political parties. B) in support of parties as a necessary 4) Interest groups can ensure that laws condition of democratic government. passed by legislatures and signed by C) suspicious of parties. executives are in keeping with current O) oblivious to parties.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright by Rhiannon Jade Goad 2013
    Copyright by Rhiannon Jade Goad 2013 The Thesis Committee for Rhiannon Jade Goad Certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: “Dr. Paul Cured my Apathy”: Ron Paul’s Libertarian Discourse APPROVED BY SUPERVISING COMMITTEE: Supervisor: Susan S Heinzelman Christopher King “Dr. Paul Cured my Apathy”: Ron Paul’s Libertarian Discourse by Rhiannon Jade Goad, B.A. Thesis Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Arts and Master of Public Affairs The University of Texas at Austin August 2013 Abstract “Dr. Paul Cured my Apathy”: Ron Paul’s Libertarian Discourse Rhiannon Jade Goad, M.A.;M.Paff The University of Texas at Austin, 2013 Supervisor: Susan S Heizelman During the 2008 and 2012 presidential elections, many young white men found a political hero in the 77-year-old Republican Congressman from Texas, whose rallies often center on obscure, technical arguments concerning the Federal Reserve. It is because of the grassroots support of the young white men who adore him that Ron Paul has become a major figure in today’s political scene. What attracts young white men to Ron Paul? This paper explores the history and discourse of Libertarianism to better understand the political subjectivity and identity of Ron Paul supporters. In Chapter 2, I historically contextualize Paul’s libertarian discourse. I argue that the discourse of libertarianism is characterized by claims to an apolitical, ahistorical past in which Libertarian rhetoric naturalizes discourses of free market capitalism, “classical” liberalism, and “authentic” Americanism.
    [Show full text]
  • American Jewish History a Qijilrteriy P11bllcatlon of the Amerloan J.Ewlsh Hlstorloal Society
    American Jewish History A QIJilrteriY P11bllcatlon of the Amerloan J.ewlsh Hlstorloal SOciety Two Jewish Lawyers Named Lollis* JONATHAN D. SARNA The year r856 was a vintage year for brilliant Jewish lawyers named Louis. On November 13, r8s6, Louis Brandeis was born in Louisville, Kentucky. One month later, on December 14, r856, Louis Marshall was born in Syracuse, New York. Louis and Louis were both first-generation Americans, born of central European Jewish parents. They both compiled stellar academic records. They both went on to have a profound affect on American law. Both were considered for seats on the U.S. Supreme Court, although only one of them made it.' And both became eminent leaders in American Jewish life. Yet while both men earned enormous respect within the Jewish and general communities, they never became friends and rarely worked to­ gether. They differed religiously, philosophically, and politically. They approached Judaism, America, and even the law itself from sharply different perspectives. The parents of Louis Brandeis and Louis Marshall arrived in America at approximately the same time in the middle of the nineteenth century.' Brandeis' parents hailed from Prague, Marshall's father from Baden and his mother from Wiimemberg. The two fathers had experienced prejudice and privation in central Europe that precipitated their emigration. Adolph Brandeis, who grew up in an urban area and studied at the Technical ,. An earlier version of this paper was delivered as the 1006 B. G. Rudolph Lecture in Judaic Studies at Syracuse University, commemorating the rsorh anniversary of the birth of Louis Marshall. I am grateful to Syracuse University for permitting me to publish the lecture here.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Atheism, Secularism, Humanism? Academy for Lifelong Learning Fall 2019 Course Leader: David Eller
    What is Atheism, Secularism, Humanism? Academy for Lifelong Learning Fall 2019 Course leader: David Eller Course Syllabus Week One: 1. Talking about Theism and Atheism: Getting the Terms Right 2. Arguments for and Against God(s) Week Two: 1. A History of Irreligion and Freethought 2. Varieties of Atheism and Secularism: Non-Belief Across Cultures Week Three: 1. Religion, Non-religion, and Morality: On Being Good without God(s) 2. Explaining Religion Scientifically: Cognitive Evolutionary Theory Week Four: 1. Separation of Church and State in the United States 2. Atheist/Secularist/Humanist Organization and Community Today Suggested Reading List David Eller, Natural Atheism (American Atheist Press, 2004) David Eller, Atheism Advanced (American Atheist Press, 2007) Other noteworthy readings on atheism, secularism, and humanism: George M. Smith Atheism: The Case Against God Richard Dawkins The God Delusion Christopher Hitchens God is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything Daniel Dennett Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon Victor Stenger God: The Failed Hypothesis Sam Harris The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Religion Michael Martin Atheism: A Philosophical Justification Kerry Walters Atheism: A Guide for the Perplexed Michel Onfray In Defense of Atheism: The Case against Christianity, Judaism, and Islam John M. Robertson A Short History of Freethought Ancient and Modern William Lane Craig and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong God? A Debate between a Christian and an Atheist Phil Zuckerman and John R. Shook, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Secularism Janet R. Jakobsen and Ann Pellegrini, eds. Secularisms Callum G. Brown The Death of Christian Britain: Understanding Secularisation 1800-2000 Talal Asad Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity Lori G.
    [Show full text]
  • Congressman Pete Stark Acknowledges Reason Rally
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Michelle Blackley Phone: (716) 636-4869, ext. 218 E-mail: [email protected] Stark Acknowledges the Reason Rally The US Congressman will contribute to the Rally March 24, in Washington, DC Washington, DC–January 26, 2012–Today, Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA) has agreed to prove a video testimonial at the Reason Rally, March 24, 2012 on the National Mall in Washington, DC. Stark is the first openly atheist member of Congress, as announced by the Secular Coalition for America (SCA). Stark acknowledged that he is an atheist in response to an SCA questionnaire sent to public officials in January 2007. During that same year he reaffirmed that he is an atheist by making a public announcement in front of the Humanist Chaplaincy at Harvard, the Harvard Law School Heathen Society, and various other atheist, agnostic, secular, humanist, and nonreligious groups. The American Humanist Association (AHA) named him their 2008 Humanist of the Year, and he now serves on the AHA Advisory Board. “Unfortunately he can’t make it personally but this endorsement from Mr. Stark is a great addition to the Reason Rally,” organizer and chair David Silverman said. The Reason Rally, a nationwide celebration sponsored by the top secular organizations in the United States, will be held from 10 AM to 5 PM. With the intent to unify, energize, and embolden secular people nationwide, the Reason Rally is a FREE event that will combat negative stereotypes about nonreligious Americans. It is slated to be the largest secular event in World history. Leaders of the secular movement, including a FREE concert by Bad Religion, will fill the rally with music, comedy and reason.
    [Show full text]
  • Review Essay: Religion and Politics 2008-2009: Sometimes You Get What You Pray For
    Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law Scholarly Works Faculty Scholarship 2010 Review Essay: Religion and Politics 2008-2009: Sometimes You Get What You Pray For Leslie C. Griffin University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub Part of the Law and Politics Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Griffin, Leslie C., "Review Essay: Religion and Politics 2008-2009: Sometimes You Get What You Pray For" (2010). Scholarly Works. 803. https://scholars.law.unlv.edu/facpub/803 This Article is brought to you by the Scholarly Commons @ UNLV Boyd Law, an institutional repository administered by the Wiener-Rogers Law Library at the William S. Boyd School of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. REVIEW ESSAY RELIGION AND POLITICS 2008-2009 THUMPIN' IT: THE USE AND ABUSE OF THE BIBLE IN TODAY'S PRESIDENTIAL POLITICS. By Jacques Berlinerblau. Westminster John Knox Press 2008. Pp. x + 190. $11.84. ISBN: 0-664-23173-X. THE SECULAR CONSCIENCE: WHY BELIEF BELONGS IN PUBLIC LIFE. By Austin Dacey. Prometheus Book 2008. Pp. 269. $17.80. ISBN: 1-591- 02604-0. SOULED OUT: RECLAIMING FAITH AND POLITICS AFTER THE RELIGIOUS RIGHT. By E.J Dionne, Jr.. Princeton University Press 2008. Pp. 251. $14.95. ISBN: 0-691-13458-8. THE POLITICAL ORIGINS OF RELIGIOUS LIBERTY By Anthony Gill. Cambridge University Press 2007. Pp. 263. Paper. $18.81. ISBN: 0-521- 61273-X. BLEACHED FAITH. THE TRAGIC COST WHEN RELIGION IS FORCED INTO THE PUBLIC SQUARE. By Steven Goldberg.
    [Show full text]
  • The Goals of Humanism1
    SOUND THE ALARM: THE GOALS OF HUMANISM1 The watchman on the wall of an ancient city had to be alert for signs of danger. His responsibility was to inform others of what he saw. Should he detect a foreign army about to attack, he needed to sound an alarm. In our own American history, we remember the midnight ride of Paul Revere—from Charleston to Medford, and on to Concord and Lexington. So through the night rode Paul Revere And so through the night went his cry of alarm To every Middlesex village and farm.2 Likewise, we must sound an alarm regarding humanism and the dangers it presents to Christians. I wish it were possible for us to shout, as did those watchmen on ancient walls, “The enemy is coming!” But that’s not the message about humanism which we must convey. That message would imply that we are here, and that humanism is off over yonder somewhere. Our message—one which leaves us with a sinking feeling—is more comparable to the announcement that “we’ve got termites in our woodwork!” Humanism is not coming. It’s already here! It has already done much damage. It has already eaten far into the structures of our society. It kills unborn babies. It hurts youth with drugs. It dirties minds with profanity. It turns children against their parents. It robs families of their wealth. It severely damages and often destroys Christian families. If left alone, humanism will eat its way through the country until eventually it has destroyed all Christian homes and churches.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15: Resources This Is by No Means an Exhaustive List. It's Just
    Chapter 15: Resources This is by no means an exhaustive list. It's just meant to get you started. ORGANIZATIONS African Americans for Humanism Supports skeptics, doubters, humanists, and atheists in the African American community, provides forums for communication and education, and facilitates coordinated action to achieve shared objectives. <a href="http://aahumanism.net">aahumanism.net</a> American Atheists The premier organization laboring for the civil liberties of atheists and the total, absolute separation of government and religion. <a href="http://atheists.org">atheists.org</a> American Humanist Association Advocating progressive values and equality for humanists, atheists, and freethinkers. <a href="http://americanhumanist.org">americanhumanist.org</a> Americans United for Separation of Church and State A nonpartisan organization dedicated to preserving church-state separation to ensure religious freedom for all Americans. <a href="http://au.org">au.org</a> Atheist Alliance International A global federation of atheist and freethought groups and individuals, committed to educating its members and the public about atheism, secularism and related issues. <a href="http://atheistalliance.org">atheistalliance.org</a> Atheist Alliance of America The umbrella organization of atheist groups and individuals around the world committed to promoting and defending reason and the atheist worldview. <a href="http://atheistallianceamerica.org">atheistallianceamerica.org< /a> Atheist Ireland Building a rational, ethical and secular society free from superstition and supernaturalism. <a href="http://atheist.ie">atheist.ie</a> Black Atheists of America Dedicated to bridging the gap between atheism and the black community. <a href="http://blackatheistsofamerica.org">blackatheistsofamerica.org </a> The Brights' Net A bright is a person who has a naturalistic worldview.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction: the Emerging Alliance of World Religions and Ecology
    Emerging Alliance of World Religions and Ecology 1 Mary Evelyn Tucker and John A. Grim Introduction: The Emerging Alliance of World Religions and Ecology HIS ISSUE OF DÆDALUS brings together for the first time diverse perspectives from the world’s religious traditions T regarding attitudes toward nature with reflections from the fields of science, public policy, and ethics. The scholars of religion in this volume identify symbolic, scriptural, and ethical dimensions within particular religions in their relations with the natural world. They examine these dimensions both historically and in response to contemporary environmental problems. Our Dædalus planning conference in October of 1999 fo- cused on climate change as a planetary environmental con- cern.1 As Bill McKibben alerted us more than a decade ago, global warming may well be signaling “the end of nature” as we have come to know it.2 It may prove to be one of our most challenging issues in the century ahead, certainly one that will need the involvement of the world’s religions in addressing its causes and alleviating its symptoms. The State of the World 2000 report cites climate change (along with population) as the critical challenge of the new century. It notes that in solving this problem, “all of society’s institutions—from organized re- ligion to corporations—have a role to play.”3 That religions have a role to play along with other institutions and academic disciplines is also the premise of this issue of Dædalus. The call for the involvement of religion begins with the lead essays by a scientist, a policy expert, and an ethicist.
    [Show full text]
  • Habermas, Taylor, and Connolly on Secularism, Pluralism, and the Post-Secular Public Sphere
    Article Habermas, Taylor, and Connolly on Secularism, Pluralism, and the Post-Secular Public Sphere Spyridon Kaltsas Department of Political Science and Public Administration, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 106 78 Athens, Greece; [email protected] Received: 17 June 2019; Accepted: 31 July 2019; Published: 1 August 2019 Abstract: The main purpose of this paper is to explore and understand the relationships between secularism, pluralism, and the post-secular public sphere in the thought of Jürgen Habermas, Charles Taylor, and William Connolly. The three authors develop a thorough critique of secularism which implies a radical break with the dogmatic idea of removing religion from the public sphere. My main objective is to show that this critique is related to a normative understanding of our post- secular situation and requires a rethinking of the boundaries of the public sphere in relation to the predicament of pluralism. Arguing against the post-metaphysical conception of secularism, Taylor develops a critique of Habermas’s “institutional translation proviso”, and Connolly stresses the agonistic dimension of the post-secular public sphere. I take these criticisms into account, while arguing that Taylor and Connolly are unable to provide a sound basis for the legitimacy of our institutional settings. In contrast to Taylor and Connolly, I propose a reading of Habermas’s theory based on the internal relationship between universal justification and the everyday contexts of pre- political solidarity. I conclude with a focus on the need to take into account the agonistic dimension of the post-secular public sphere. Keywords: post-secular society; secularism; public sphere; pluralism; legitimation; ethics of citizenship; Jürgen Habermas; Charles Taylor; William Connolly 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurrah for Freedom of Inquiry
    FI Feb-Mar 2006 Pages 1/3/06 11:34 AM Page 4 EDITORIAL FI Editorial Staff PAUL KURTZ Editor in Chief Paul Kurtz Editor Thomas W. Flynn Associate Editors Nathan Bupp, Austin Dacey, David Koepsell Managing Editor Deputy Editor Andrea Szalanski Norm R. Allen Jr. Columnists Vern Bullough, Arthur Caplan, Richard Dawkins, Shadia B. Drury, Sam Harris, Nat Hentoff, Christopher Hitchens, Wendy Kaminer, Tibor R. Machan, Peter Singer Ethics Editor Elliot D. Cohen Literary Editor Jennifer Michael Hecht Senior Editors Vern L. Bullough, Bill Cooke, Hurrah for Richard Dawkins, Martin Gardner, James A. Haught, Jim Herrick, Gerald A. Larue, Taslima Nasrin Freedom of Inquiry: Contributing Editors Jo Ann Boydston, Albert Ellis, Roy P. Fairfield, Charles Faulkner, Antony Flew, Levi Fragell, Adolf Grünbaum, Marvin Kohl, Thelma Lavine, Lee Nisbet, J.J.C. Smart, Vital Issues for Svetozar Stojanovi´c, Thomas Szasz Editorial Associate DJ Grothe Secular Humanists Editorial Assistant David Park Musella Art Director Lisa A. Hutter here is an ongoing debate among secular humanists as to Production what our priorities should be, and in particular, what Christopher Fix, Paul E. Loynes Sr. should be the primary focus of FREE INQUIRY. Two subjects Cartoonist Webmaster Don Addis Kevin Christopher have been among the most hotly debated. First is the burn- Contributing Illustrators T ing desire of many secular humanists that we engage in political Brad Marshall, Todd Julie activism. Many secularists, naturalists, and humanists believe that Cover Illustration Todd Julie the United States faces so many critical problems that we need to focus far more intensely on the political battles of today, especially Council for Secular Humanism the culture wars with the Religious Right.
    [Show full text]