DOCSLIB.ORG

North Geelong. Case Study Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

North Geelong. Case Study Report -·"' .'.i{~r: . '· '. ·! A ENERGY· . " Department of G ENVIRONMENT ERDC VICTORIA Infrastructure ENERGY RESEARCH ~-'-I PROTECTION - '\------- Go\'emmenl AND DEVELOPMENT 1rgy S.ave Money AUTHORITY . of Vk1oria CORPORATION 711-.43 099451 URB:NG copy 1 ~g; ~~~~iii:· .:Jl ·i~~l~~ 4f~; l~~31 n: ~~~~L m:== ~Ir. North Geelong Case Study Report Prepared by Fisher Stewart Pty. Ltd. in conjunction with Ecologically Sustainable Design Pty. Ltd. PLANNING & EPA for LIBRARY City of Greater Geelong Environment Protection Authority, Victoria Energy Victoria Department of Infrastructure Energy Research and Development Corporation ISBN O 7306 9311 2 (- - _,.-~ ----·-~ 711. 43 Urban villages project I August 1996 099451 North Geelong case ' URB:NG study report copy 1 PERSONNEL INVOLVED IN THE PROJECT Peter Krstic Fisher Stewart Pry. Ltd. Charrette Man~er Chip Kaufman Ecological Sustainable Design Leader of Charrette and Urban Design George Simic Fisher Stewart Pry. Ltd. Senior Urban Designer Debra Williams Siteworks Pry. Ltd. Urban Designer Jim Higgs TIM Consulting Traffic Engineer Claire Ferres TIM Consulting Urban Designer Peter van Wyk Fisher Stewart Pry. Ltd. Civil Engineer Peter Edgeley Peter Edgeley Pry. Ltd. Illustrator Neil Savery City of Greater Geelong Council Representative Kent Dogshum City of Greater Geelong Council Representative Scott Pedder City of Greater Geelong Council Representative Yvonne Rust Department of Infrastructure Project Assistant Nathan Alexander Energy Victoria Project Co-ordinator Wendy Morris Department of Infrastructure Working Party Member Martin Halpin Student Working Party Member Sophia Schyshow Environment Protection Authority Project Manager Beverley Smith Energy Victoria Working Party Member CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction 5 2 Existing Conditions and Issues 6 2.1 Function of the Site 6 2.2 Physical Character 6 2.3 Land Use 13 2.4 Zoning 13 2.5 £.P.A. Buffers 13 2.6 Community and Employment 16 3 Developing the Proposal 18 3.1 Objectives and Targets 18 3.2 Approach 18 3.3 Consultation Process 18 3.4 Draft Concepts 19 4 Proposal 22 4.1 The Vision 22 4.lA The Mixed Use Urban Village Precinct Plan 22 4.IB Catalyst Developments 26 4.2 Financial Analysis 33 4.2.l Viability of Overall Concept 33 4.2.2 Supporting Public Sector Investment 34 4.2.3 Short Term Development Potential 35 4.3 Energy Assessment 35 4.4· Implementation Strategy 35 5 Conclusions 39 Appendices 1 Charrette Schedule 40 2 Materials Distributed to the Public 42 3 Schedule of Public Consultation Events 50 4 Residual Land Value Analysis 51 5 Energy Assessment 52 6 Recommended Directions 53 LIST OF FIGURES Page 1 Regional Context Plan 8 2 Loe Map 9 3 Public Realm Map 10 4 Ped Shed 11 5 Urban Structure Table 12 6 Land Use Plan 14 7 Zoning Map 15 8 Residential Scaciscics Table 17 9 Mixed Use Urban Village Precinct Plan 23 10 30 View of Housing in Drainage Reserve 28 11 30 View of New Retail in Station Square 31 12 30 View of New Building Next co the Arena and 32 Pedestrian and Vehicle Crossing at Victoria Street West 13 Schedule of Actions 37 1 Introduction The Urban Villages Project lead by the The eight selected sites are in the following Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) municipalities: Energy Victoria and the Department of City of Nunawading (Blackbum) Planning and Development, is a joint Moreland City Council (Brunswick) initiative of state and local governments. City of Yarra (Richmond) This project is overseen by a steering City of Greater Geelong committee comprising of local and state City of Stonnington (Prahran) governments, the Commonwealth Energy City of Darebin (Preston) Research Development Corporation, and Bayside City Council (Sandringham) chaired by the EPA. This project emerged City of Knox (Bayswater) from the Greenhouse Neighbourhood Project which found that substantial This report is for the North Geelong savings in transport and housing energy Proposed Urban Village' in the City of requirements and greenhouse gas emissions Greater Geelong. The study area could be achieved through the application incorporates an 800 metre radius from the of sustainable urban design principles. North Geelong Railway Station, extending to lnkerman and Mackey Streets to the The project is centred around 8 s!tes that north, Wattletree Road to the south, Corio were selected around Melbourne and Bay to the east and Thompson Road in the Geelong which have the potential to be west. developed as Urban Villages. As part of the project consultants were instructed to The radius of 800m was chosen instead of produce design concepts and undertake 400m as in the other proposed urban economic assessments for development villages, because of the larger lot sizes in within the urban village. Some funding the industrial and residential areas and the may be available from the State vacant saleyards area that took up much of Government for development of designs the area. and implementation plans. The project was conducted within the Urban Villages are considered to be format of a Charrette. A Charrette is an compact, defined communities intensive interactive process where all the incorporating high density development, required information and specialists are high pedestrian movement and a present to enable the relevant issues to be community or commercial focus, well considered and firm decisions to be made. serviced by public transport, generous The process is open to all interested parties, public spaces and high quality urban is significantly quicker than other methods design. They are also based around and seeks to provide ownership to all who sustainable development principles such as have participated. As part of this project a energy and resource conservation four day Charrette was held in April 1995, incorporating design features to minimise the outcomes of which are part of this waste production and water consumption. report. Each village is based around a transport hub, whether it be a train station, tram or bus terminal or a combination, and some kind of commercial area. 5 2 Existing conditions and an audience from Geelong, Melbourne and . often interstate. The amount and type of issues use this stadium is subject to can vary. Besides being used for basketball it is also 2.1 Function of the site used as a concert, theatre, promotions and school productions venue. Presently the The proposed North Geelong Urban Village Arena is still establishing itself as an site is located about 65 kilometres south­ entertainment venue, therefore accurate west of Melbourne on the Princes Highway information as to the usage trends is the main thoroughfare between Geelong difficult to obtain. and Melbourne. It is centred around the North Geelong railway station situated on The position of North Geelong in a regional the western side of the highway. All context is shown in the regional context country passenger services operated by plan included as Figure 1. This plan shows V /Line stop at this station on their way in the location of other major retail, and out of Geelong, to or from Melbourne, commercial and community services, the except for those to and from Warmambool. Geelong city centre, Corio Bay, the industrial area to the north, the proposed To the north of the 'village' is the major freeway and major parks and gardens. industrial area of Geelong which is host to many heavy industrial activities. On the 2.2 Physical charact1:r west of Princes Highway within the study area is a Light Industrial area which acts as North Geelong generally operates as two a buffer to the residential areas to the south separate areas with little interaction and east. between. The railway and Princes Highway split the area into east and west The Geelong City Centre is located about 3 portions. The east being predominantly to 3.5 kilometres to the south near the residential and the west being a Geelong Railway station. Located in this combination of industrial and residential. area is the major shopping area, Council offices and a variety of retail and The general street pattern in the area is a commercial services. Pedestrian trails grid formation with some back lanes along the foreshore also link the proposed located to the east and south east of the urban village to the Geelong City Centre. station. A lot map showing the layout of the area is included as Figure 2. Other major retail centres near the study area are: the Corio Village Shopping Centre Access to the station from the east is limited to the north and small strip shopping areas by an underpass for pedestrian traffic and along Pakington Street and Shannon an overpass for vehicular traffic. Some Avenue to the south. parking for the station is located in the service lane on the west side of the A number of primary and secondary highway. Dwellings to the east of the study schools are located to the north east. area are constructed of brick and weather­ board in the Federation and California The Midland Highway or Ballarat Road Bungalow styles. joins the Princes Highway just south of the •·. study area offering excellent access to Within the industrial area to the west the Ballarat. predominant building type is the large warehouse type building constructed of The Arena on the western side of the brick or highway adjacent to the station is the home steel. The buildings in the north are of the Geelong Supercats Basketball team generally older while those to the south are part of the National Basketball League. newer and more modem. Dwellings to the From this association the stadium attracts 6 west and south of the industrial area are North Geelong area much of the north-west predominantly brick. area is outside the 400 metre walking distance indicating poor street efficiency in Landmarks in the study area include the area.
Recommended publications
  • Revitalising Central Geelong Action Plan 2016/17 Overview

    Revitalising Central Geelong Action Plan 2016/17 Overview

    REVITALISING CENTRAL GEELONG ACTION PLAN 2016/17 Overview © The State of Victoria Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning 2016 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licence. You are free to re-use the work under that licence, on the condition that you credit the State of Victoria as author. The licence does not apply to any images, photographs or branding, including the Victorian Coat of Arms, the Victorian Government logo and the Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning (DELWP) logo. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Cover image and above image courtesy of City of Greater Geelong. Printed by Impact Digital, Brunswick, Victoria ISBN 978-1-76047-186-6 (Print) ISBN 978-1-76047-187-3 (pdf/online) Disclaimer This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence which may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. B PREMIER’S Geelong has a long and proud history. Home to some of our greatest artists, leaders FOREWORD and inventors, the city has always shone as a place of creativity and energy. We need to ensure Geelong’s future is just as bright. Of course, it is up to the people of Geelong to make and take the opportunities that shape that future.
  • Geelong & the Bellarine

    Geelong & the Bellarine

    acedon Ranges Geelong & The Bellarine Geelong, Victoria’s second largest city, pulses to its own distinctive beat. The lively waterfront has prime position on a north-facing bay, rare in the Southern Hemisphere. Across Geelong, old industrial spaces have been reinvented as new galleries and on-trend cafés. Just 20 minutes from the Geelong city centre, the Bellarine Peninsula offers golden-sand beaches, al fresco dining, just- caught seafood and local boutique wineries with some of the most striking views across the bay back to Melbourne. Geelong and The Bellarine is part of the GSTR (Great Southern Touring Route) and Go Beyond Melbourne. Kardinia Park Kardinia Park is a sporting and entertainment venue located in South Geelong. The stadium, which is owned and operated by the Kardinia Park Stadium Trust, is the home ground of the Geelong Football Club. TOP ATTRACTIONS Little Malop Street Precinct The Little Malop Street precinct is emerging as Geelong’s coolest spot to eat, drink and enjoy the good things about the city. It’s culture central with an edge. The new Geelong Library and Heritage Centre is the most striking piece of architecture in town. Tech meets tradition in a library evolving beyond its books. Next door is the Geelong Gallery, while across the road the Geelong Performing Arts Centre is a hub of theatre, music and drama for the region. The next block of Little Malop Street then shifts from eyes and ears to bellies, with a bunch of great places to eat and drink within a few hundred Narana Aboriginal Cultural Centre metres.
  • Rise Above. Experience Theheights

    Rise Above. Experience Theheights

    Rise Above. Experience theheights. Nestled in an established neighbourhood, The Heights brings together beautiful soft landscapes and contemporary homes to create a new community of a unique standard. Designed to complement the breathtaking outlook, it is time to rise above the rest with a luxury lifestyle you’ve always dreamed of. 2 | Rise Above | 3 Enjoy the space, admire the views. Situated in Herne Hill this prestigious, established community boasts uninterrupted views of the stunning hillside. The Heights has plenty of wide open space within its unique surroundings for you and your family to live and grow. With a variety of schools, shops, transport and parks close by, you can enjoy the luxury of secluded living while remaining connected to the surrounding community. 4 | Rise Above | 5 Live at the centre of it all. Already established iconic shopping strips, leading schools, Barwon River leisure trails and Geelong’s employment sectors make The Heights an enviable choice for families. The sheer visual beauty of The Heights is one thing but imagine the convenience of having Geelong’s best amenity right on your doorstep. The iconic Pakington Street, less than 5 minutes away, boasts some of the best lifestyle and shopping options available in Geelong. Pick up a coffee and relax in one of the many eateries or boutique coffee houses or enjoy the serenity as you meander along one of the many walking paths on the picturesque Barwon River. Plenty of choice 10 Primary Schools 2-7 mins drive 9 5 Secondary Schools 4-7 mins drive mins Gordon Institute of Tafe 6 mins drive School run Deakin University 9 mins drive A choice of 17 Schools from Primary to Tertiary within a short drive Geelong College St Josephs College Schooling options from pre-school, primary, secondary and tertiary are all within easy access.
  • Ports and Environs Advisory Committee

    Ports and Environs Advisory Committee

    Planning and Environment Act 1987 PORTS AND ENVIRONS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Report of the Advisory Committee pursuant to Section 151 of the Act Advisory Committee: Mark Marsden, Chair Des Grogan, Member Helen Weston, Member David Whitney, Member 29 October 2010 Ports and Environs Advisory Committee Report of the Advisory Committee: 29 October 2010 Report of the Advisory Committee Pursuant to Section 151 of the Act Mark Marsden, Chair Des Grogan, Member Helen Weston, Member David Whitney, Member Page 2 Ports and Environs Advisory Committee Report of the Advisory Committee: 29 October 2010 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. PART A – BACKGROUND ...............................................................................................16 1. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................17 1.1 CHALLENGES FOR PORT PLANNING........................................................................17 1.2 STATE AND NATIONAL POLICY CONTEXT...............................................................18 1.3 VICTORIA’S FOUR COMMERCIAL TRADING PORTS ..................................................18 1.4 THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ...................................................................................20 1.5 TERMS OF REFERENCE .............................................................................................20 1.6 COMMITTEE PROCESS..............................................................................................20 2. SUBMISSIONS....................................................................................................23
  • Portable Buildings World Heritage Nomination Task Force

    Portable Buildings World Heritage Nomination Task Force

    PORTABLE BUILDINGS OF THE NINETEENTH CENTURY a proposal for World Heritage listing Portable Buildings World Heritage Nomination Task Force 2 Overseas advisers Marc Braham, Belgium, structural engineer & historian Dr Tomo Inoue, Kyushu University, Japan, architectural historian Dr David Mitchell, Glasgow, Director of Conservation, Historic Scotland. Dr Sara Wermiel, USA, historian of technology Dr Yeo Kang Shu,. President, ICOMOS Singapore Overseas bodies Construction History Society (UK): Dr Nina Baker; Michael Heaton Australian advisers The Hon Dr Barry O Jones, former Vice-President of the World Heritage Committee Sue Balderstone, former ICOMOS World Heritage Advisor Dr Pedro Guedes, Queensland, architectural historian Rosemary Rosario, Western Australia, conservation architect Paul Stark, South Australia, conservation architect Dr John Ting, ACT, architect and conservationist Australian bodies Association for Preservation Technology International, Australasia Chapter: Dr Donald Ellsmore Australian Centre for Architectural History, Urban and Cultural Heritage (ACAHUCH) University of Melbourne, Professor Philip Goad, Professor Hannah Lewi, Professor Julie Willis Australia ICOMOS: Peter Romey, Convenor, Australia ICOMOS World Heritage Reference Group Australian Institute of Architects NSW Chapter Heritage Committee: Dr Jenifer Preston, chair Australian Institute of Architects Victorian Chapter Heritage Committee: Jude Doyle, chair City of Greater Geelong: Councillor Peter Murrihy; David Scott, Senior Heritage Planner Engineering Heritage
  • February 2021 MMHN Update These Are Clearly Perplexing

    February 2021 MMHN Update These Are Clearly Perplexing

    Melbourne – A Great Maritime City February 2021 MMHN Update These are clearly perplexing, unpredictable and unprecedented times. Just when we thought ‘it safe to go back into the water’ so to speak and that the pandemic tide had ebbed enabling a return to near normality, yet another COVID variant mysteriously penetrated our quarantine strategies and we face Lockdown again. We are grappling with mysterious, invisible viral mutations. And of course, perplexing, unpredictable and, dare I say, unfathomable (!) maritime heritage mysteries also confound us at sea. For example: BASS STRAIT TRIANGLE aka The Great Ship Swallower’ In his book Mysteries of the Bass Strait Triangle J.K. Loney describes the terrible toll it [Bass Strait] has taken of ships, aircraft and men in less than 200 years. Loney poses the question: Do mysterious forces exert a power over this stretch of water to ruthlessly destroy with no logical explanation? Noting a century or so ago seafarers reported sighting more sea monsters in the waters around Australia than any other oceans of the globe. In modern times these tales have been replaced by stories of UFOs… We are assured that all incidents described here have been carefully researched and documented some might say that it is quite easy (but less fun) to understand why sailing in Bass Strait was lethal. Squeezed between the northern coastline of Tasmania and Victoria’s central to eastern coast, Bass Strait is studded with islands, leading to unpredictable sea conditions - Winds, tides and shallow waters result in tall, yet short, waves and the short swell often churns in conflicting directions.
  • HMVS Cerberus Conservation Management Plan September 2002

    HMVS Cerberus Conservation Management Plan September 2002

    HMVS Cerberus Conservation Management Plan September 2002 Prepared by Ross Anderson Maritime Heritage Unit Heritage Victoria CONTENTS Acknowledgements 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Scope of Conservation Management Plan 2.0 Definition of the site 2.1 Position of the Cerberus 2.2 Area of the rectangular Protected Zone 3.0 Statement of cultural heritage significance 3.1 International 3.2 National 3.3 State 3.4 Local 3.5 Aesthetic 3.6 Archaeological 3.7 Historical 3.8 Technical 3.9 Scientific 3.10 Recreational 3.11 Ability to demonstrate 4.0 Elements of historic fabric 4.1 Deck and turrets 4.2 Collapsed hull 4.3 Buried hull 5.0 Conservation policy 5.1 Conservation options 5.1.1 Managed collapse and cathodic protection 5.1.2 Removal of deck to a land-based display and more stable environment 5.1.3 Stabilisation of deck in-situ with supporting structure 5.2 Conservation of elements 5.2.1 Guns and turrets 5.2.2 Hull 5.2.2.1 Intrusive materials 5.2.2.2 Destructive works 5.2.3 Buried hull 5.2.4 Timber deck 5.2.4.1 Maintenance 5.2.4.2 Removal 5.3 Support substructure 5.4 Risks, public access and risk management 5.4.1 Assessment of risk 5.4.2 Public access 5.4.3 Risk management 5.5 Flexibility of conservation policy 6.0 Care of Fabric and Maintenance 7.0 Documentation 8.0 Planning and management structure for future work and maintenance 8.1 ‘Save the Cerberus Alliance’ committee members 8.2 Historic Shipwrecks Advisory Committee (HSAC) and Heritage Council 9.0 Bibliography Acknowledgements Many people have assisted with their comments toward the final version of this document.
  • Redevelopment of 50 Mackey Street, North Geelong (Powerview Pty Ltd Proposal)

    Redevelopment of 50 Mackey Street, North Geelong (Powerview Pty Ltd Proposal)

    Planning and Environment Act 1987 Advisory Committee Report Redevelopment of 50 Mackey Street, North Geelong (Powerview Pty Ltd proposal) 1 April 2020 Planning and Environment Act 1987 Advisory Committee Report pursuant to section 151 of the Act Redevelopment of 50 Mackey Street, North Geelong (Powerview Pty Ltd proposal) 1 April 2020 Michael Kirsch, Chair Steve Blackley, Member Redevelopment of 50 Mackey Street, North Geelong (Powerview Pty Ltd proposal) Advisory Committee Report 1 April 2020 Contents Page 1 Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 1.1 The permit application ............................................................................................ 1 1.2 Background .............................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Procedural issues ..................................................................................................... 3 2 Background ...............................................................................................................5 2.1 The subject site and surrounding area .................................................................... 5 2.2 The Pivot City Innovation District ............................................................................ 7 2.3 The Port of Geelong ................................................................................................ 8 3 Planning context ....................................................................................................
  • Port of Geelong Draft Port Land Use Strategy

    Port of Geelong Draft Port Land Use Strategy

    1 Port of Geelong: Draft Port Land Use Strategy Toll GeelongPort and Department of Infrastructure Port of Geelong: Draft Port Land Use Strategy 2 Port of Geelong: Draft Port Land Use Strategy Prepared for Toll GeelongPort and Department of Infrastructure Prepared by Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd Level 9, 8 Exhibition Street, Melbourne VIC 3000, Australia T +61 3 9653 1234 F +61 3 9654 7117 www.maunsell.com ABN 20 093 846 925 March 2007 30023506 © Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd 2007 The information contained in this document produced by Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd is solely for the use of the Client identified on the cover sheet for the purpose for which it has been prepared and Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd undertakes no duty to or accepts any responsibility to any third party who may rely upon this document. All rights reserved. No section or element of this document may be removed from this document, reproduced, electronically stored or transmitted in any form without the written permission of Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd. Cover image Corio Quay, grain bunkers and pier. 3 Contents Explanatory Note 5 Making a submission 5 Executive Summary 6 Summaries of Key Strategies 9 Part A — Need for a Strategic Framework for the Port of Geelong 11 1 Background to the Land Use Strategy 12 1.1 Introduction 12 1.2 Community Feedback in 2004 and 2005 13 1.3 Need for a new approach 13 2 Port Overview 15 2.1 Vision for the port 15 2.2 Land Management 15 2.3 Port Facilities 15 2.4 Economic Value 17 2.5 Port Trade 17 2.6 Port Area of Interest 17 2.7 Transport Infrastructure
  • The Audit Report and Appendices As Presented in the Hardcopy Format

    The Audit Report and Appendices As Presented in the Hardcopy Format

    INFORMATION REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL AUDIT REPORTS August 2007 VICTORIA’S AUDIT SYSTEM AUDIT REPORT CURRENCY An environmental audit system has operated in Audit reports are based on the conditions encountered Victoria since 1989. The Environment Protection Act and information reviewed at the time of preparation 1970 (the Act) provides for the appointment by the and do not represent any changes that may have Environment Protection Authority (EPA Victoria) of occurred since the date of completion. As it is not environmental auditors and the conduct of possible for an audit to present all data that could be independent, high quality and rigorous environmental of interest to all readers, consideration should be audits. made to any appendices or referenced documentation An environmental audit is an assessment of the for further information. condition of the environment, or the nature and extent When information regarding the condition of a site of harm (or risk of harm) posed by an industrial changes from that at the time an audit report is process or activity, waste, substance or noise. issued, or where an administrative or computation Environmental audit reports are prepared by EPA- error is identified, environmental audit reports, appointed environmental auditors who are highly certificates and statements may be withdrawn or qualified and skilled individuals. amended by an environmental auditor. Users are Under the Act, the function of an environmental advised to check EPA’s website to ensure the currency auditor is to conduct environmental audits and of the audit document. prepare environmental audit reports. Where an environmental audit is conducted to determine the PDF SEARCHABILITY AND PRINTING condition of a site or its suitability for certain uses, an environmental auditor may issue either a certificate or EPA Victoria can only certify the accuracy and statement of environmental audit.
  • Central Geelong Framework Plan Advisory Committee

    Central Geelong Framework Plan Advisory Committee

    Central Geelong Framework Plan Advisory 111 Committee Full Name: Dr Phillip Roos Organisation: Live+Smart Research Laboratory Affected property: Attachment 1: https://engage.vic.gov.au/download_file/49572 Attachment 2: https://engage.vic.gov.au/download_file/49573 Attachment 3: Comments: Submission Cover Sheet 7th July 2021 To: Central Geelong Framework Plan Advisory Committee Email: [email protected] Dear Committee Members, Central Geelong Framework Plan – A Biophilic Response Thank you for the opportunity to complete a submission in response to the draft Central Geelong Framework Plan. This submission outlines the value of a Biophilic City, precedents, design principles that underpin an integrated Biophilic City. Most importantly this response considers how the Draft Central Geelong Planning Framework can be refined to set Geelong up to harness the benefits of a Biophilic City. I look forward to the opportunity to discuss our submission further. Yours Sincerely Dr Phillip B. Roös RAIA RIBA SAIA MPIA AAIA GSAP ISAP Associate Professor Director Live + Smart Research Lab School of Architecture & Built Environment Faculty of Science Engineering & Built Environment, Deakin University W: https://livesmartlab.deakin.edu.au Deakin University Live+Smart Research Laboratory | Page 1 CONTENTS I: INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................2 II: A BIOPHILIC CITY ..................................................................................... 4 2. 1 WHAT IS A BIOPHILIC CITY

  • EPA Works Approval Application

    Works Approval Application Noise levels from the operation of the Project have been predicted at the NSAs, during day, evening and night periods. The predictions were made for two sets of meteorological conditions: . Scenario 1: Neutral meteorological conditions . Scenario 2: Adverse meteorological conditions The details of the meteorological conditions are provided in Table 13.3 Table 13.3: Meteorological conditions Meteorological Wind Speed* [m/s] Temperature Humidity Pasquil stability category (from condition (°C) (%) CONCAWE noise propagation model) Neutral 0 20 70 Neutral (D) Adverse 3 15 50 Worst Case (F) *The wind direction resulting in the highest noise level at the Noise Sensitive Areas was used in determining the impact. 13.4 Assessment results The predicted noise levels at the nearest NSAs (for day, evening and nigh-tine periods) and their compliance with effective RMNLS are provided in Table 13.4 and shown in Figure 13.3. Predicted noise levels are in compliance with effective RMNLs at all sensitive receptor locations. Table 13.4: Predicted noise levels and compliance with effective RMNLs under adverse meteorological conditions (with mitigations) Effective RMNLs dB(A) Predicted Compliance with effective RMNLs? Location Address noise level Day Evening Night dB(A) Day Evening Night R01 40 Minyip Rd 55 49 44 31.3 YES YES YES R02 45 Minyip Rd 55 49 44 33.7 YES YES YES R03 50 Minyip Rd 55 49 44 32.3 YES YES YES R04 55 Minyip Rd 55 49 44 34.4 YES YES YES R05 60 Minyip Rd 55 49 44 34.5 YES YES YES R06 65 Minyip Rd 55 49 44 37.2 YES