DOCSLIB.ORG

Family-Group Names of Recent Fishes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Zootaxa 3882 (2): 001–230 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Monograph ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2014 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3882.1.1 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:03E154FD-F167-4667-842B-5F515A58C8DE ZOOTAXA 3882 Family-group names of Recent fishes RICHARD VAN DER LAAN1,5, WILLIAM N. ESCHMEYER2 & RONALD FRICKE3,4 1Grasmeent 80, 1357JJ Almere, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected] 2Curator Emeritus, California Academy of Sciences, 55 Music Concourse Drive, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA. E-mail: [email protected] 3Im Ramstal 76, 97922 Lauda-Königshofen, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 4Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde Stuttgart, Rosenstein 1, D-70191 Stuttgart, Germany [temporarily out of office] 5Corresponding author Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Accepted by L. Page: 6 Sept. 2014; published: 11 Nov. 2014 Licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 RICHARD VAN DER LAAN, WILLIAM N. ESCHMEYER & RONALD FRICKE Family-group names of Recent fishes (Zootaxa 3882) 230 pp.; 30 cm. 11 Nov. 2014 ISBN 978-1-77557-573-3 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-77557-574-0 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2014 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2014 Magnolia Press 2 · Zootaxa 3882 (1) © 2014 Magnolia Press VAN DER LAAN ET AL. Table of contents Abstract . .3 Introduction . .3 Methods . .5 Rules for the family-group names and how we dealt with them . .6 How to use the family-group names list . .13 Family-group names list . .14 Acknowledgements . .136 References . .136 Index . .211 Abstract The family-group names of animals (superfamily, family, subfamily, supertribe, tribe and subtribe) are regulated by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature. Family names are particularly important because they are among the most widely used of all technical animal names. Apart from using the correct family-group name according to the Code, it is also important to use one unique universal name (with a fixed spelling) to avoid confusion. We have compiled a list of family- group names for Recent fishes, applied the rules of the Code and, if possible, tried to conserve the names in prevailing recent practice. We list all of the family-group names found to date for Recent fishes (N=2625), together with their author(s) and year of publication. This list can be used in assigning the correct family-group name to a genus or a group of genera. With this publication we contribute to the usage of correct, universal family-group names in the classification of, and for communication about, Recent fishes. Key words: family names, subfamily names, tribal names, ICZN, Zoological Code, nomenclature, prevailing spelling, prevailing recent practice Introduction The goal of this publication is to contribute to the use of correct family-group names in Recent fishes. Confusion about names, inconsistent use, and incorrect spellings create problems in communication and in searches for information. The zoological family-group names include superfamily (suffix –oidea), family (suffix –idae), subfamily (suffix –inae), tribe (suffix –ini), and subtribe (suffix –ina). They are regulated by the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature (hereafter referred to as the Code) as published by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature (ICZN). The 4th edition of the Code (in effect on 1 January 2000) provided a set of rules for the naming of animals and the resolution of nomenclatural problems. Consistency in the use of valid family-group names is very important because they are among the most widely used of all technical names for fishes. They are used by fish systematists and frequently by scientists in related fields of biology, by naturalists, fishermen and aquarium hobbyists (van der Laan 2014). Like every scientific name, a family-group name serves as a tool for the storage and retrieval of information attached to the taxon. Family-group names also are important in that they often are used to form English vernacular names (and adjectives) as follows: · Tribes (–ini): by changing the suffix to singular in or plural ins; for example, Characini to characin fishes or characins · Subfamilies (–inae): by changing the suffix to singular ine or plural ines; for example, Characinae to characine fishes or characines · Families (–idae): by changing the suffix to singular id or plural ids; for example, Characidae to characid fishes or characids · Superfamilies (–oidea): by changing the suffix to singular ide or plural ides; for example, Characoidea to characide fishes or characides. As a result, an error in spelling of a family-group name extends to errors in vernacular names. Furthermore, if the names of higher-ranked taxa, specifically ordinal names (superorders, orders or suborders), are based on a FAMILY-GROUP NAMES OF RECENT FISHES Zootaxa 3882 (1) © 2014 Magnolia Press · 3 typified system (Alonso-Zarazaga 2005; Dubois 2005, 2006a, 2006b), incorrect use of a stem for family-group names will result in the incorrect formation of names in the ordinal series. The preamble of the Code states: “Priority of publication is a basic principle of zoological nomenclature; however, under conditions prescribed in the Code its application may be modified to conserve a long-accepted name in its accustomed meaning.” Although priority is the guiding principle in recognition of valid family-group names, disagreements may exist about the correct spelling. For example, Robins et al. (1991:4–5; see also Nelson 2006:xii) discussed several problems with spelling and suggested that when disagreements occur, names should be selected based on “prevailing recent practice.” Wheeler (1990) had made more or less the same argument when he suggested that decisions be based on ‘the consent of the learned’ (Stearn 1985) and ‘accepted usage’. This list of family-group names of Recent fishes is based on the principle of priority, and when disagreements on spelling occur, on prevailing use. As Kottelat (2013:388) and many others have noted, decisions about prevailing use can be subjective. For example, Robins (1991) noted the use of both Eleotridae and Eleotrididae for sleepers. Relative to such decisions, the Code, Article 29.3.1.1, states that “If the stem so formed ends in -id, those letters may be elided before adding the family-group suffixes. If, however, the unelided form is in prevailing usage, that spelling is to be maintained, whether or not it is the original spelling.” In our opinion, strict application of Article 29.3.1 leads to unnecessary changes in the spelling of some very familiar names and certainly does not lead to consensus on the spelling of family names. If we found one spelling widely used by many workers, we accepted that spelling as correct. This list was compiled in an attempt to find all family-group names ever published for Recent fishes (a total of 2,625 names), evaluate their availability, and provide the correct spelling with author(s) and publication date. The generic classification in the Catalog of Fishes (Eschmeyer, 2014, http://research.calacademy.org/research/ ichthyology/catalog/fishcatmain.asp) was used to list the family-group names. The ‘Index to the family-group names’ provides an alphabetical list of all family-group names. History The use of family-group names for fishes started in the beginning of the 19th century. Duméril (1805) is generally regarded as the first author to publish family-group names, and soon was followed by Rafinesque (Rafinesque 1810a, 1810b, 1815) and many others. See Gill (1889a) for notes on early ‘namers’ of families. In those early publications it is sometimes difficult to distinguish the suprageneric name as a family-group name rather than a higher-level name (of the order/class-series: suborder, order, superorder, … class) because suffixes were not yet standardized (Dubois 2006b: pp. 175–179 and 206–210; Dubois & Bour 2010). Also, some early family names were in vernacular form (not latinized). At the beginning of the 19th century many plural endings were used, gradually transforming to family suffixes such as –idae (used by Bonaparte, Günther), –oidae (Agassiz, Gill) or –oidei (Bleeker), and to subfamily suffixes including –ini (Bonaparte), –inae (Gill) or –iformes (Bleeker), and finally leading to the current Code-regulated suffixes. In addition to names published explicitly as family-group names, this list includes all names assigned to a cohors, group, Gruppe, stirps, phalanx and subgroup when they refer to a group of Recent fishes above the genus and below the level of suborder. In 1895 an International Commission was elected by the Third International Zoology Congress at Leiden to draft some explicit rules of nomenclatural, and in 1897 the Règles de la Nomenclature Zoologique proposées au Congrès de Cambridge was published. In it were the first rules to regulate family names. Article 31 established the suffix –idae for the family names and the suffix –inae for subdivisions of families. The rules were gradually amended over the years (Sabrosky 1947; Temple 1962), but the Règles internationals de la Nomenclature Zoologique (1905) remained more or less in force until 1961, after which various rules of the Code were amended (1st edition, 1961; 2nd edition, 1963; 3rd edition, 1985; and 4th edition, 1999). The stem of a family-group name is based on the name of its type genus (Article 29.3). However, in part because the rules have changed over the years, determination of what constitutes the correct stem has led in some cases, to changes in spelling of family-group names. Steyskal (1980) argued for consistent, grammatically correct formation of the stem but his suggestion was not followed universally, which led to confusion (Wheeler 1990). A change in the rules has removed much of the confusion.
Recommended publications
  • Modifications of the Digestive Tract for Holding Air in Loricariid and Scoloplacid Catfishes

    Modifications of the Digestive Tract for Holding Air in Loricariid and Scoloplacid Catfishes

    Copeia, 1998(3), pp. 663-675 Modifications of the Digestive Tract for Holding Air in Loricariid and Scoloplacid Catfishes JONATHAN W. ARMBRUSTER Loricariid catfishes have evolved several modifications of the digestive tract that • appear to fWIction as accessory respiratory organs or hydrostatic organs. Adapta­ tions include an enlarged stomach in Pterygoplichthys, Liposan:us, Glyptoperichthys, Hemiancistrus annectens, Hemiancistrus maracaiboensis, HyposWmus panamensis, and Lithoxus; a U-shaped diverticulum in Rhinelepis, Pseudorinelepis, Pogonopoma, and Po­ gonopomoides; and a ringlike diverticulum in Otocinclus. Scoloplacids, closely related to loricariids, have enlarged, clear, air-filled stomachs similar to that of Lithoxus. The ability to breathe air in Otocinclus was confirmed; the ability of Lithoxus and Scoloplax to breathe air is inferred from morphology. The diverticula of Pogonopomoides and Pogonopoma are similar to swim bladders and may be used as hydrostatic organs. The various modifications of the stomach probably represent characters that define monophyletic clades. The ovaries of Lithoxus were also examined and were sho~ to have very few (15--17) mature eggs that were large (1.6-2.2 mm) for the small size of the fish (38.6-41.4 mm SL). Los bagres loricariid an desarrollado varias modificaciones del canal digestivo que aparentan fWIcionar como organos accesorios de respiracion 0 organos hidrostati­ cos. Las adaptaciones incluyen WI estomago agrandado en Pterygoplichthys, Liposar­ cus, Glyproperichthys, Hemiancistrus annectens, Hemiancistrus maracaiboensis, Hyposto­ mus panamensis, y Lithoxus; WI diverticulum en forma de U en Rhinelepis, Pseudori­ nelepis, Pogonopoma, y Pogonopomoides; y WI diverticulum en forma de circulo en Otocinclus. Scoloplacids, de relacion cercana a los loricariids, tienen estomagos cla­ ros, agrandados, llenos de aire similares a los de Lithoxus.
  • FAMILY Loricariidae Rafinesque, 1815

    FAMILY Loricariidae Rafinesque, 1815

    FAMILY Loricariidae Rafinesque, 1815 - suckermouth armored catfishes SUBFAMILY Lithogeninae Gosline, 1947 - suckermoth armored catfishes GENUS Lithogenes Eigenmann, 1909 - suckermouth armored catfishes Species Lithogenes valencia Provenzano et al., 2003 - Valencia suckermouth armored catfish Species Lithogenes villosus Eigenmann, 1909 - Potaro suckermouth armored catfish Species Lithogenes wahari Schaefer & Provenzano, 2008 - Cuao suckermouth armored catfish SUBFAMILY Delturinae Armbruster et al., 2006 - armored catfishes GENUS Delturus Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1889 - armored catfishes [=Carinotus] Species Delturus angulicauda (Steindachner, 1877) - Mucuri armored catfish Species Delturus brevis Reis & Pereira, in Reis et al., 2006 - Aracuai armored catfish Species Delturus carinotus (La Monte, 1933) - Doce armored catfish Species Delturus parahybae Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1889 - Parahyba armored catfish GENUS Hemipsilichthys Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1889 - wide-mouthed catfishes [=Upsilodus, Xenomystus] Species Hemipsilichthys gobio (Lütken, 1874) - Parahyba wide-mouthed catfish [=victori] Species Hemipsilichthys nimius Pereira, 2003 - Pereque-Acu wide-mouthed catfish Species Hemipsilichthys papillatus Pereira et al., 2000 - Paraiba wide-mouthed catfish SUBFAMILY Rhinelepinae Armbruster, 2004 - suckermouth catfishes GENUS Pogonopoma Regan, 1904 - suckermouth armored catfishes, sucker catfishes [=Pogonopomoides] Species Pogonopoma obscurum Quevedo & Reis, 2002 - Canoas sucker catfish Species Pogonopoma parahybae (Steindachner, 1877) - Parahyba
  • Iktiofauna Air Tawar Beberapa Danau Dan Sungai Inletnya Di Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah, Indonesia

    Iktiofauna Air Tawar Beberapa Danau Dan Sungai Inletnya Di Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah, Indonesia

    ©Journal of Aquatropica Asia p-issn: 2407-3601 Volume 4, Nomor 1, Tahun 2019 Jurusan Akuakultur, Universitas Bangka Belitung IKTIOFAUNA AIR TAWAR BEBERAPA DANAU DAN SUNGAI INLETNYA DI PROVINSI SULAWESI TENGAH, INDONESIA FREHSWATER FISH OF LAKES AND IT’S INLET RIVERS IN SULAWESI TENGAH PROVINCE, INDONESIA Muh. Herjayanto1,5,6,., Abdul Gani2,6, Yeldi S. Adel3, Novian Suhendra4,6 1Program Studi Ilmu Perikanan, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Serang, Indonesia 2Program Studi Akuakultur, Fakultas Perikanan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Luwuk, Banggai, Indonesia 3Program Studi Teknologi Penangkapan Ikan, Sekolah Tinggi Perikanan dan Kelautan Palu, Indonesia 4Stasiun Karantina Ikan Pengendalian Mutu dan Keamanan Hasil Perikanan Palu, Indonesia 5Masyarakat Iktiologi Indonesia 6Tim Ekspedisi Riset Akuatika (ERA) Indonesia .email penulis korespondensi: [email protected] Abstrak Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah (Sulteng) berada dalam kawasan Wallacea memiliki ikan endemik di danau serta sungai inletnya. Selain itu, pemerintah juga telah melakukan introduksi ikan ke perairan umum untuk kesejahteraan masyarakat. Sejauh ini catatan iktiofauna air tawar di Sulteng belum terangkum dengan baik. Oleh karena itu, kami menelusuri hasil penelitian terdahulu tentang jenis ikan di 11 danau dan sungai inletnya di Sulteng. Danau (D) tersebut yaitu D. Bolano (Bolanosau), D. Lindu, D. Poso, D. Rano, D. Rano Kodi dan D. Rano Bae, Danau Sibili, D. Talaga (Dampelas), D. Kalimpa’a (Tambing), D. Tiu dan D. Wanga. Selain itu, kami juga melakukan pengamatan ikan di tujuh danau antara tahun 2012-2019. Penangkapan ikan menggunakan jaring lempar, jaring pantai, pukat insang dan pancing. Hasil rangkuman dan pengamatan menunjukkan bahwa terdapat 18 famili dan 27 genus ikan di 11 danau dan sungai inletnya di Sulteng.
  • A New Black Baryancistrus with Blue Sheen from the Upper Orinoco (Siluriformes: Loricariidae)

    A New Black Baryancistrus with Blue Sheen from the Upper Orinoco (Siluriformes: Loricariidae)

    Copeia 2009, No. 1, 50–56 A New Black Baryancistrus with Blue Sheen from the Upper Orinoco (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) Nathan K. Lujan1, Mariangeles Arce2, and Jonathan W. Armbruster1 Baryancistrus beggini, new species, is described from the upper Rı´o Orinoco and lower portions of its tributaries, the Rı´o Guaviare in Colombia and Rı´o Ventuari in Venezuela. Baryancistrus beggini is unique within Hypostominae in having a uniformly dark black to brown base color with a blue sheen in life, and the first three to five plates of the midventral series strongly bent, forming a distinctive keel above the pectoral fins along each side of the body. It is further distinguished by having a naked abdomen, two to three symmetrical and ordered predorsal plate rows including the nuchal plate, and the last dorsal-fin ray adnate with adipose fin via a posterior membrane that extends beyond the preadipose plate up to half the length of the adipose-fin spine. Se describe una nueva especie, Baryancistrus beggini, del alto Rı´o Orinoco y las partes bajas de sus afluentes: el rı´o Guaviare en Colombia, y el rı´o Ventuari en Venezuela. Baryancistrus beggini es la u´ nica especie entre los Hypostominae que presenta fondo negro oscuro a marro´ n sin marcas, con brillo azuloso en ejemplares vivos. Las primeras tres a cinco placas de la serie medioventral esta´n fuertemente dobladas, formando una quilla notable por encima de las aletas pectorales en cada lado del cuerpo. Baryancistrus beggini se distingue tambie´n por tener el abdomen desnudo, dos o tres hileras de placas predorsales sime´tricas y ordenadas (incluyendo la placa nucal) y el u´ ltimo radio de la aleta dorsal adherido a la adiposa a trave´s de una membrana que se extiende posteriormente, sobrepasando la placa preadiposa y llegando hasta la mitad de la espina adiposa.
  • Amazon Alive: a Decade of Discoveries 1999-2009

    Amazon Alive: a Decade of Discoveries 1999-2009

    Amazon Alive! A decade of discovery 1999-2009 The Amazon is the planet’s largest rainforest and river basin. It supports countless thousands of species, as well as 30 million people. © Brent Stirton / Getty Images / WWF-UK © Brent Stirton / Getty Images The Amazon is the largest rainforest on Earth. It’s famed for its unrivalled biological diversity, with wildlife that includes jaguars, river dolphins, manatees, giant otters, capybaras, harpy eagles, anacondas and piranhas. The many unique habitats in this globally significant region conceal a wealth of hidden species, which scientists continue to discover at an incredible rate. Between 1999 and 2009, at least 1,200 new species of plants and vertebrates have been discovered in the Amazon biome (see page 6 for a map showing the extent of the region that this spans). The new species include 637 plants, 257 fish, 216 amphibians, 55 reptiles, 16 birds and 39 mammals. In addition, thousands of new invertebrate species have been uncovered. Owing to the sheer number of the latter, these are not covered in detail by this report. This report has tried to be comprehensive in its listing of new plants and vertebrates described from the Amazon biome in the last decade. But for the largest groups of life on Earth, such as invertebrates, such lists do not exist – so the number of new species presented here is no doubt an underestimate. Cover image: Ranitomeya benedicta, new poison frog species © Evan Twomey amazon alive! i a decade of discovery 1999-2009 1 Ahmed Djoghlaf, Executive Secretary, Foreword Convention on Biological Diversity The vital importance of the Amazon rainforest is very basic work on the natural history of the well known.
  • Beloniformes, Adrianichthyidae) Endemic to Sulawesi, Indonesia( Digest 要約 )

    Beloniformes, Adrianichthyidae) Endemic to Sulawesi, Indonesia( Digest 要約 )

    Phylogenetic and taxonomic studies of the medaka Title (Beloniformes, Adrianichthyidae) endemic to Sulawesi, Indonesia( Digest_要約 ) Author(s) Mokodongan, Daniel Frikli Citation Issue Date 2016-09 URL http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12000/35389 Rights Abstract Although the family Adrianichthyidae is broadly distributed throughout East and Southeast Asia, 19 endemic species are distributed in Sulawesi, which is an island in Wallacea. However, it remains unclear how Adrianichthyidae biodiversity hotspot was shaped. Moreover, seven of the 19 endemic species were described within this decade, suggesting that we still do not know the full picture of the biodiversity of this family in this small island ofthe Indo-Australian Archipelago. First, I reconstructed molecular phylogenies for the Sulawesi adrianichthyids and estimated the divergence times of major lineages to infer the detailed history of their origin and subsequent intra-island diversification. The mitochondrial and nuclear phylogenies revealed that Sulawesi adrianichthyids are monophyletic, which indicates that they diverged from a single common ancestor. Species in the earliest branching lineages are currently distributed in the central and southeastern parts of Sulawesi, indicating that the common ancestor colonized Sula Spur, which is a large promontory that projects from the Australian continental margin, from Asia by tectonic dispersal c.a. 20 Mya. The first diversification event on Sulawesi, the split of the genus Adrianichthys, occurred c.a. 16 Mya, and resulted in the nesting of the genus Adrianichthys within Oryzias. Strong geographic structure was evident in the phylogeny; many species in the lineages branching off early are riverine and widely distributed in the southeastern and southwestern arms of Sulawesi, which suggests that oversea dispersal between tectonic subdivisions of this island during the late Miocene (7-5 Mya) contributed to the distributions and diversification of the early branching lineages.
  • Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf

    Updated Checklist of Marine Fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the Proposed Extension of the Portuguese Continental Shelf

    European Journal of Taxonomy 73: 1-73 ISSN 2118-9773 http://dx.doi.org/10.5852/ejt.2014.73 www.europeanjournaloftaxonomy.eu 2014 · Carneiro M. et al. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. Monograph urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A5F217D-8E7B-448A-9CAB-2CCC9CC6F857 Updated checklist of marine fishes (Chordata: Craniata) from Portugal and the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf Miguel CARNEIRO1,5, Rogélia MARTINS2,6, Monica LANDI*,3,7 & Filipe O. COSTA4,8 1,2 DIV-RP (Modelling and Management Fishery Resources Division), Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, Av. Brasilia 1449-006 Lisboa, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 3,4 CBMA (Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology), Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] * corresponding author: [email protected] 5 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:90A98A50-327E-4648-9DCE-75709C7A2472 6 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:1EB6DE00-9E91-407C-B7C4-34F31F29FD88 7 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:6D3AC760-77F2-4CFA-B5C7-665CB07F4CEB 8 urn:lsid:zoobank.org:author:48E53CF3-71C8-403C-BECD-10B20B3C15B4 Abstract. The study of the Portuguese marine ichthyofauna has a long historical tradition, rooted back in the 18th Century. Here we present an annotated checklist of the marine fishes from Portuguese waters, including the area encompassed by the proposed extension of the Portuguese continental shelf and the Economic Exclusive Zone (EEZ). The list is based on historical literature records and taxon occurrence data obtained from natural history collections, together with new revisions and occurrences.
  • Phylogeny of the Epinephelinae (Teleostei: Serranidae)

    Phylogeny of the Epinephelinae (Teleostei: Serranidae)

    BULLETIN OF MARINE SCIENCE, 52(1): 240-283, 1993 PHYLOGENY OF THE EPINEPHELINAE (TELEOSTEI: SERRANIDAE) Carole C. Baldwin and G. David Johnson ABSTRACT Relationships among epinepheline genera are investigated based on cladistic analysis of larval and adult morphology. Five monophyletic tribes are delineated, and relationships among tribes and among genera of the tribe Grammistini are hypothesized. Generic com- position of tribes differs from Johnson's (1983) classification only in the allocation of Je- boehlkia to the tribe Grammistini rather than the Liopropomini. Despite the presence of the skin toxin grammistin in the Diploprionini and Grammistini, we consider the latter to be the sister group of the Liopropomini. This hypothesis is based, in part, on previously un- recognized larval features. Larval morphology also provides evidence of monophyly of the subfamily Epinephelinae, the clade comprising all epinepheline tribes except Niphonini, and the tribe Grammistini. Larval features provide the only evidence of a monophyletic Epine- phelini and a monophyletic clade comprising the Diploprionini, Liopropomini and Gram- mistini; identification of larvae of more epinephelines is needed to test those hypotheses. Within the tribe Grammistini, we propose that Jeboehlkia gladifer is the sister group of a natural assemblage comprising the former pseudogrammid genera (Aporops, Pseudogramma and Suttonia). The "soapfishes" (Grammistes, Grammistops, Pogonoperca and Rypticus) are not monophyletic, but form a series of sequential sister groups to Jeboehlkia, Aporops, Pseu- dogramma and Suttonia (the closest of these being Grammistops, followed by Rypticus, then Grammistes plus Pogonoperca). The absence in adult Jeboehlkia of several derived features shared by Grammistops, Aporops, Pseudogramma and Suttonia is incongruous with our hypothesis but may be attributable to paedomorphosis.
  • Temporal Diversification of Mesoamerican Cichlid Fishes Across

    Temporal Diversification of Mesoamerican Cichlid Fishes Across

    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS AND EVOLUTION Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 31 (2004) 754–764 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Temporal diversification of Mesoamerican cichlid fishes across a major biogeographic boundary C. Darrin Hulsey,a,* Francisco J. Garcıa de Leon, b Yara Sanchez Johnson,b Dean A. Hendrickson,c and Thomas J. Neara,1 a Center for Population Biology, Department of Evolution and Ecology, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA b Laboratorio de Biologıa Integrativa, Instituto Tecnologico de Cuidad Victoria (ITCV), Mexico c Section of Integrative Biology, University of Texas-Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA Received 18 June 2003; revised 26 August 2003 Abstract The Mexican Neovolcanic Plateau sharply divides the vertebrate fauna of Mesoamerica where the climate of both the neotropics and temperate North America gradually blend. Only a few vertebrate groups such as the Heroine cichlids, distributed from South America to the Rio Grande in North America, are found both north and south of the Neovolcanic Plateau. To better understand the geography and temporal diversification of cichlids at this geologic boundary, we used mitochondrial DNA sequences of the cy- tochrome b (cyt b) gene to reconstruct the relationships of 52 of the approximately 80 species of Heroine cichlids in Mesoamerica. Our analysis suggests several cichlids in South America should be considered as part of the Mesoamerican Heroine clade because they and the cichlids north of the Isthmus of Panama are clearly supported as monophyletic with respect to all other Neotropical cichlids. We also recovered a group containing species in Paratheraps + Paraneetroplus + Vieja as the sister clade to Herichthys. Herichthys is the only cichlid clade north of the Mexican Plateau and it is monophyletic.
  • 5. the Pesciara-Monte Postale Fossil-Lagerstätte: 2. Fishes and Other Vertebrates

    5. the Pesciara-Monte Postale Fossil-Lagerstätte: 2. Fishes and Other Vertebrates

    Rendiconti della Società Paleontologica Italiana, 4, 2014, pp. 37-63 Excursion guidebook CBEP 2014-EPPC 2014-EAVP 2014-Taphos 2014 Conferences The Bolca Fossil-Lagerstätten: A window into the Eocene World (editors C.A. Papazzoni, L. Giusberti, G. Carnevale, G. Roghi, D. Bassi & R. Zorzin) 5. The Pesciara-Monte Postale Fossil-Lagerstätte: 2. Fishes and other vertebrates [ CARNEVALE, } F. BANNIKOV, [ MARRAMÀ, ^ C. TYLER & ? ZORZIN G. Carnevale, Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Valperga Caluso 35, I-10125 Torino, Italy; [email protected] A.F. Bannikov, Borisyak Paleontological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, Profsoyuznaya 123, Moscow 117997, Russia; [email protected] G. Marramà, Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Torino, Via Valperga Caluso, 35 I-10125 Torino, Italy; [email protected] J.C. Tyler, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution (MRC-159), Washington, D.C. 20560 USA; [email protected] R. Zorzin, Sezione di Geologia e Paleontologia, Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, Lungadige Porta Vittoria 9, I-37129 Verona, Italy; [email protected] INTRODUCTION ][` ~[~ `[ =5} =!+~ [=5~5 Ceratoichthys pinnatiformis5 #] ~}==5[ ~== }}=OP[~` [ "O**""P "}[~* "+5$!+? 5`=5` ~]!5`5 =5=[~5_ O"!P#! [=~=55~5 `#~! ![[[~= O"]!#P5`` `5} 37 G. Carnevale, A.F. Bannikov, G. Marramà, J.C. Tyler & R. Zorzin FIG. 1_Ceratoichthys pinnatiformis~=5"!Q5=` 5. The Pesciara-Monte Postale Fossil-Lagerstätte: 2. Fishes and other vertebrates `== `]5"`5`" O*!P[~ `= =5<=[ ~#_5` [#5!="[ [~OQ5=5""="P5 ` [~`}= =5^^+55 ]"5++"5"5* *5 [=5` _5 [==5 *5]5[=[[5* [5=~[` +~++5~5=!5 ["5#+?5?5[=~[+" `[+=\`` 5`55`_= [~===5[=[5 ```_`5 [~5+~++5 [}5` `=5} 5= [~5O# "~++[=[+ P5`5 ~[O#P #"5[+~` [=Q5 5" QRQ5$5 ][5**~= [`OQ= RP`=5[` `+5=+5`=` +5 _O# P5+5 O? ]P _ #`[5[=~ [+#+?5` !5+`}==~ `5``= "!=Q5 "`O? ]P+5 _5`~[ =`5= G.
  • Venom Evolution Widespread in Fishes: a Phylogenetic Road Map for the Bioprospecting of Piscine Venoms

    Venom Evolution Widespread in Fishes: a Phylogenetic Road Map for the Bioprospecting of Piscine Venoms

    Journal of Heredity 2006:97(3):206–217 ª The American Genetic Association. 2006. All rights reserved. doi:10.1093/jhered/esj034 For permissions, please email: [email protected]. Advance Access publication June 1, 2006 Venom Evolution Widespread in Fishes: A Phylogenetic Road Map for the Bioprospecting of Piscine Venoms WILLIAM LEO SMITH AND WARD C. WHEELER From the Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, 1200 Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027 (Leo Smith); Division of Vertebrate Zoology (Ichthyology), American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024-5192 (Leo Smith); and Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024-5192 (Wheeler). Address correspondence to W. L. Smith at the address above, or e-mail: [email protected]. Abstract Knowledge of evolutionary relationships or phylogeny allows for effective predictions about the unstudied characteristics of species. These include the presence and biological activity of an organism’s venoms. To date, most venom bioprospecting has focused on snakes, resulting in six stroke and cancer treatment drugs that are nearing U.S. Food and Drug Administration review. Fishes, however, with thousands of venoms, represent an untapped resource of natural products. The first step in- volved in the efficient bioprospecting of these compounds is a phylogeny of venomous fishes. Here, we show the results of such an analysis and provide the first explicit suborder-level phylogeny for spiny-rayed fishes. The results, based on ;1.1 million aligned base pairs, suggest that, in contrast to previous estimates of 200 venomous fishes, .1,200 fishes in 12 clades should be presumed venomous.
  • FAMILY Plesiopidae Günther, 1861 - Roundheads, Longfins

    FAMILY Plesiopidae Günther, 1861 - Roundheads, Longfins

    FAMILY Plesiopidae Günther, 1861 - roundheads, longfins SUBFAMILY Acanthoclininae Günther, 1861 - spiny basslets GENUS Acanthoclinus Jenyns, 1841 - spiny basslets [=Acanthoclinus Jenyns [L.], 1841:91, Taumakoides (subgenus of Acanthoclinus) Whitley [G. P.], 1955:111] Notes: [The zoology of the voyage of H. M. S. Beagle; ref. 2344] Masc. Acanthoclinus fuscus Jenyns, 1842. Type by original designation. Mooi 1993 [ref. 21801] places the Acanthoclinidae as a subfamily of the Plesiopidae. Type by original designation (also monotypic, second species questionably included). •Valid as Acanthoclinus Jenyns, 1841 -- (Hardy 1985:360 [ref. 5184], Smith-Vaniz & Johnson 1990:223 [ref. 16561], Mooi 1993:322 [ref. 21801], Yerman & Leis 2011:79 [ref. 31400], Stewart 2015:1208 [ref. 34196]). Current status: Valid as Acanthoclinus Jenyns, 1841. Plesiopidae: Acanthoclininae. (Taumakoides) [Australian Zoologist v. 12 (pt 2); ref. 4722] Masc. Acanthoclinus trilineatus Griffin, 1933. Type by original designation (also monotypic). •Valid as Taumakoides Whitley, 1955 -- (Hardy 1985:364 [ref. 5184]). •Synonym of Acanthoclinus Jenyns, 1841 -- (Smith-Vaniz & Johnson 1990:223 [ref. 16561]). Current status: Synonym of Acanthoclinus Jenyns, 1841. Plesiopidae: Acanthoclininae. Species Acanthoclinus fuscus Jenyns, 1841 - olive rockfish [=Acanthoclinus fuscus Jenyns [L.], 1841:92, Pl. 18 (fig. 2), Acanthoclinus taumaka Clarke [F. E.], 1879:293, Pl. 15 (upper right)] Notes: [The zoology of the voyage of H. M. S. Beagle; ref. 2344] Bay of Islands, New Zealand. Current status: Valid as Acanthoclinus fuscus Jenyns, 1841. Plesiopidae: Acanthoclininae. Distribution: New Zealand. Habitat: marine. (taumaka) [Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zealand Institute v. 11 (art. 25) (for 1878); ref. 18006] Jackson's Bay, New Zealand. Current status: Synonym of Acanthoclinus fuscus Jenyns, 1841.