DOCSLIB.ORG

Offshore Wind in Europe – Key Trends and Statistics 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Offshore Wind in Europe – Key Trends and Statistics 2020 Offshore Wind in Europe Key trends and statistics 2020 Offshore Wind in Europe Key trends and statistics 2020 Published in February 2021 windeurope.org This report summarises construction and financing activity in European offshore wind farms from 1 January to 31 December 2020. WindEurope regularly surveys the industry to determine the level of installations of foundations and turbines, and the subsequent dispatch of first power to the grid. The data includes demonstration sites and factors in decommissioning where it has occurred. Annual installations are expressed in gross figures while cumulative capacity represents net installations per site and country. Rounding of figures is at the discretion of the author. DISCLAIMER This publication contains information collected on a regular basis throughout the year and then verified with relevant members of the industry ahead of publication. Neither WindEurope nor its members, nor their related entities are, by means of this publication, rendering professional advice or services. Neither WindEurope nor its members shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this publication. TEXT AND ANALYSIS: Lizet Ramírez, WindEurope Daniel Fraile, WindEurope Guy Brindley, WindEurope EDITOR: Rory O’Sullivan, WindEurope DESIGN: Laia Miró, WindEurope Lin Van de Velde, Drukvorm FINANCE DATA: Clean Energy Pipeline and IJ Global All currency conversions made at EUR/ GBP 0.8897 and EUR/USD 1.1422. Figures include estimates for undisclosed values. PHOTO COVER: Kriegers Flak substation, Courtesy of Van Oord. MORE INFORMATION: [email protected] +32 2 213 11 68 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .....................................................................................................6 1. OFFSHORE WIND INSTALLATIONS ............................................................................9 1.1 OVERVIEW ......................................................................................................................9 1.1 NATIONAL BREAKDOWN OF 2020 INSTALLATIONS .................................11 1.2 CUMULATIVE INSTALLATIONS ..............................................................................14 2. TRENDS: TURBINE SIZE AND WIND FARM LOCATION ....................................16 2.1 WIND TURBINE RATED CAPACITY ......................................................................16 2.2 WIND FARM SIZE .........................................................................................................17 2.3 WATER DEPTH AND DISTANCE TO SHORE ....................................................19 2.4 FLOATING WIND ...........................................................................................................20 3. INDUSTRY ACTIVITY AND SUPPLY CHAIN .............................................................23 CONTENTS 3.1 WIND TURBINE MANUFACTURERS ....................................................................23 3.2 WIND FARM OWNERS ..............................................................................................25 3.3 SUBSTRUCTURES AND FOUNDATIONS ...........................................................26 3.4 CABLES ............................................................................................................................29 3.5 VESSELS ..........................................................................................................................30 4. INVESTMENTS AND POLICY DEVELOPMENTS ....................................................32 4.1 FINANCING ACTIVITY ................................................................................................32 4.2 OFFSHORE PPAs .........................................................................................................34 4.3 AUCTION RESULTS .....................................................................................................34 4.4 POLICY DEVELOPMENTS AND OUTLOOK .......................................................35 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Europe added 2.9 GW of offshore capacity during 2020. Europe now has a total installed offshore wind capacity of That’s 356 new offshore wind turbines connected to the 25 GW. That corresponds to 5,402 grid-connected wind tur- grid, across nine wind farms. bines across 12 countries. FIGURE A Annual offshore wind installations by country (left axis) and cumulative capacity (right axis) (GW) 5.0 30 4.5 25 4.0 3.5 20 3.0 2.5 15 2.0 10 1.5 1.0 5 Annual Installed Capacity (GW) 0.5 Cumulative Installed Capacity (GW) 0 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 UK Germany Denmark Belgium Netherlands Sweden Finland Portugal Spain Ireland France Cumulative installed capacity Source: WindEurope Eight new offshore wind projects reached Final Invest- Investments in new assets accounted for €26.3bn and ment Decision (FID) in four different countries during 7.1 GW of additional capacity was financed. 2020, with construction due to start in the coming years. 6 Offshore Wind in Europe - Key trends and statistics 2020 WindEurope Executive Summary Installations in 2020 Trends: turbine and wind farm size, depth, distance from shore, auctions • Europe added 2,918 MW of new capacity. The Netherlands (1,493 MW), Belgium (706 MW), the UK • The average rated capacity of turbines installed in (483 MW), Germany (219 MW) and Portugal (17 MW) 2020 was 8.2 MW, with two-thirds of the wind farms supplied this new capacity to the grid. with offshore works in 2020 using turbines larger than this. • The European grid saw 356 offshore wind turbines connected across nine wind farms in 2020. • The average size of wind farms was 788 MW, 26% larger than last year. • Europe saw nine new wind farms completed (grid- connected). One has partial grid connection and will • The average distance to shore was 52 km and the be fully commissioned in 2021. Construction work water depth 44 m. started on six other wind farms where no turbines have yet been grid-connected. • The Hollandse Kust Noord V was the only auction this year – a consortium of Shell New Energies and Eneco • Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy connected 63% won. of new turbines to the grid. Vestas Wind Systems connected 34%, while the remaining 3% were • GE Renewable Energy received the largest order for Senvion turbines. wind turbines, from SSE and Equinor for the Dogger Bank (A and B) in the UK. The project will feature 190 GE Haliade-X 13 MW turbines. Financing highlights • Europe saw a financing record of €26.3bn for new Cumulative installations projects. There was 7.1 GW of new capacity financed in France, the Netherlands and the UK. • There are 5,402 turbines connected to the grid, totalling 25,014 MW. • The two largest wind farms - Hollandse Kust Zuid 1-4 (1.5 GW) and Dogger Bank A and B (2.4 GW) - • There are now 116 offshore wind farms in 12 together raised almost €13bn in capital. European countries (including one site with partial grid- connected turbines). • Overall, the UK and Germany have attracted the most investments over the past ten years. • The UK has the largest offshore wind capacity in Europe, with 42% of all installations. Germany is • Corporates signed six offshore Power Purchase second with 31%, followed by the Netherlands (10%), Agreements in 2020 in Germany, Belgium, and the UK. Belgium (9%) and Denmark (7%). • Ørsted (17%), RWE Renewables (10%), Vattenfall (6%) and Macquarie Capital (6%) are the largest owners of offshore wind farms. Offshore Wind in Europe - Key trends and statistics 2020 7 WindEurope Offshore wind farms in Europe 2.9 GW NEW CAPACITY INSTALLED IN 2020 25 GW TOTAL CAPACITY NOW INSTALLED Moray East Kincardine Triton Knoll Hornsea Two East Anglia One Kriegers Flak EnBW Albatros Trianel Windpark Borkum 2 Fryslan Wind farm status Borssele 3&4 Online Borssele 5 Partially online Borssele 1&2 Under construction Wind farms with Northwester 2 construction activity in 2020 Seamade BELGIUM (Mermaid & Seastar) orthwester 2 Seamade (see p.31) (Mermaid & Seastar) DENMARK Kriegers Flak (see p.12) GERMANY EnBW Albatros Trianel Windpark Borkum 2 Windfloat Atlantic NETHERLANDS: Borssele 1&2 (see p.15) Borssele 5 Borssele 3&4 Fryslan PORTUGAL Windfloat Atlantic (see p.22) UK East Anglia One Hornsea Two Kincardine Moray East (see p.22) Source: WindEurope Triton Knoll 1. OFFSHORE WIND INSTALLATIONS 1.1 OVERVIEW Europe connected 2,918 MW of offshore wind power Portugal finalised the installation of Windfloat Atlantic. capacity in 2020, a 20% decrease on 2019, but in line with Denmark completed the monopiles installation at the our pre-COVID-19 forecast, a sign of the commitment of Kriegers Flak wind farm, the first offshore hybrid project the wind industry to deliver on their installation plans. The connected simultaneously to Denmark and Germany. Netherlands (1,493 MW), Belgium (706 MW), the UK (483 MW), Germany (219 MW) and Portugal (17 MW) supplied The publication of the Offshore Renewables Energy Strat- this new capacity to the grid. egy (ORES) sets out the EU’s ambition to build 300 GW of offshore wind by 2050. European installation rates are The Netherlands connected almost half of all the capac- still far less than what the sector will need to deliver this ity to the grid with the connection of most turbines at and the 2030 National Energy and Climate Plans, as pre- Borssele 1-5 sites. Belgium also set a national installation sented in chapter 4. record and Seamade became its largest operational wind farm (487 MW). The UK connected fewer turbines to the Europe has a total of 25,014 MW installed at the end of grid but
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wind Energy in Europe 2020 Statistics and the Outlook for 2021-2025
    Subtittle if needed. If not MONTH 2018 Published in Month 2018 Wind energy in Europe 2020 Statistics and the outlook for 2021-2025 Wind energy in Europe 2020 Statistics and the outlook for 2021-2025 Published in February 2021 windeurope.org This report summarises new installations and financing activity in Europe’s wind farms from 1 January to 31 December 2020. It also analyses how European markets will develop in the next five years (2021 to 2025). The outlook is based on WindEurope internal analysis and consultation with its members. The data represents gross installations per site and country unless otherwise stated. Rounding of figures is at the discretion of the author. DISCLAIMER This publication contains information collected on a regular basis throughout the year and then verified with relevant members of the industry ahead of publication. Neither WindEurope, nor its members, nor their related entities are, by means of this publication, rendering professional advice or services. Neither WindEurope nor its members shall be responsible for any loss whatsoever sustained by any person who relies on this publication. TEXT AND ANALYSIS: WindEurope Business Intelligence Ivan Komusanac Guy Brindley Daniel Fraile Lizet Ramirez EDITOR: Rory O’Sullivan DESIGN: Lin Van de Velde, Drukvorm PHOTO COVER: Jacques Tarnero for Shutterstock WindEurope acknowledges the kind cooperation of the following associations and institutions: IG Windkraft (AT) – BOP, EDORA and ODE (BE) - BGWEA (BG) – HROTE, Renewable Energy Sources of Croatia (HR) - Czech Wind
    [Show full text]
  • (2019), Hydrogen Production from Offshore Wind Power
    HYDROGEN PRODUCTION FROM OFFSHORE WIND POWER Denis THOMAS Business Development - Renewable Hydrogen Hydrogenics Europe N.V. WindEurope Exhibition 2019 Bilbao (Spain), 2 April 2019 1 MHI VESTAS THOUGHT LEADERS FORUM| BILBAO (SP) | 02.04.2019 Hydrogen production from offshore wind power AGENDA 1. Intro: Hydrogenics, Hydrogen and Renewable Hydrogen 2. Renewable hydrogen from floating offshore wind in Japan (JIDAI) 3. Renewable hydrogen from offshore wind in the Netherlands 4. Closing remarks 2 MHI VESTAS THOUGHT LEADERS FORUM| BILBAO (SP) | 02.04.2019 Hydrogenics in Brief 4 productions sites Belgium, Canada, Germany and USA 180+ ON-SITE HYDROGEN GENERATION dedicated employees Electrolyzers Our raw materials $ 48M Industrial Hydrogen supply water & renewable power are 2017 annual sales H2O + electricity H2 + ½ O2 infinite! 2000+ 1 single focus fuel cell sites hydrogen solutions POWER SYSTEMS Fuel cells Stand-by Power Mobile Power Modules 500+ MW Power Plants Publicly Electrolysis plants traded in operation H2 + ½ O2 H2O + electricity NASDAQ (HYGS) and TSX (HYG) since 20002000 Global leader in 2 main hydrogen technologies: RENEWABLE HYDROGEN electrolysis and fuel cells 70+ years Energy Storage of experience 1,500+ Hydrogen Refueling Station Electrolysis plants Power-to-X sold since 1948 Grid balancing services 3 MHI VESTAS THOUGHT LEADERS FORUM| BILBAO (SP) | 02.04.2019 HySTAT™ 60 - alkaline electrolyser 4 MHI VESTAS THOUGHT LEADERS FORUM| BILBAO (SP) | 02.04.2019 World hydrogen market But most (96%) of the hydrogen ~1 €/kg produced today is not CO2-free (from gas, oil, coal) 2-8 €/kg If produced from renewable power via electrolysis, hydrogen is fully renewable and CO2-free. 1-2 €/kg Renewable hydrogen has the potential to decarbonize a large 20 €/MWh (power) range of applications 1 €/kg H2 (power cost in H2 cost) ~10 €/kg Production Storage / Transport / Distribution End5 -use MHI VESTAS THOUGHT LEADERS FORUM| BILBAO (SP) | 02.04.2019 Data source: The Hydrogen Economy, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Financial Report, Second Quarter 2021
    Company announcement No. 16/2021 Interim Financial Report Second Quarter 2021 Vestas Wind Systems A/S Hedeager 42,8200 Aarhus N, Denmark Company Reg. No.: 10403782 Wind. It means the world to us.TM Contents Summary ........................................................................................................................................ 3 Financial and operational key figures ......................................................................................... 4 Sustainability key figures ............................................................................................................. 5 Group financial performance ....................................................................................................... 6 Power Solutions ............................................................................................................................ 9 Service ......................................................................................................................................... 12 Sustainability ............................................................................................................................... 13 Strategy and financial and capital structure targets ................................................................ 14 Outlook 2021 ................................................................................................................................ 17 Consolidated financial statements 1 January - 30 June .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy and Economic Recovery in Europe How Wind Energy Will Put Communities at the Heart of the Green Recovery
    Wind energy and economic recovery in Europe How wind energy will put communities at the heart of the green recovery Wind energy and economic recovery in Europe How wind energy will put communities at the heart of the green recovery October 2020 windeurope.org Wind energy and economic recovery in Europe: How wind energy will put communities at the heart of the green recovery WindEurope These materials, including any updates to them, are The socio-economic impact evaluation of wind energy on published by and remain subject to the copy right of the European Union has been carried out using the SNA93 the Wood Mackenzie group ("Wood Mackenzie"), its methodology (System of National Accounts adopted in licensors and any other third party as applicable and are 1993 by the United Nations Statistical Commission) and made available to WindEurope (“Client”) and its Affiliates Deloitte’s approaches, which evaluate the effects of the under terms agreed between Wood Mackenzie and Client. renewable energy in the economy. The use of these materials is governed by the terms and conditions of the agreement under which they were Deloitte has provided WindEurope solely with the services provided. The content and conclusions contained are and estimations defined in the proposal signed by confidential and may not be disclosed to any other person WindEurope and Deloitte on March 13th, 2020. Deloitte without Wood Mackenzie's prior written permission. accepts no responsibility or liability towards any third The data and information provided by Wood Mackenzie party that would have access to the present document should not be interpreted as advice.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Post-Fukushima Stress Test for the Borssele Nuclear Power Plant
    Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture & Innovation Netherlands’ National Report on the Post- Fukushima Stress Test for the Borssele Nuclear Power Plant December 2011 Netherlands’ National Report On the post-Fukushima stress test for the Borssele Nuclear Power Plant Ministry of Economic affairs, Agriculture & Innovation Ministerie van Economische zaken, Landbouw & Innovatie (EL&I) December 2011 The Netherlands’ National Report on the Post – Fukushima stress test for Borssele NPP Abstract This is the National Report of the Kingdom of the Netherlands on the post-Fukushima ‘stress test’ of the Borssele (one unit) Nuclear Power Plant, the KCB. This report complies with the guidelines published by ENSREG in May (objectives & scope) and October 2011 (structure of report) for National Reports. The operator of the KCB has submitted a Licensee Report to the regulatory body, that addresses all topics prescribed in the ENSREG guidelines for the ‘stress test’ and meets the prescribed format. The National Report presents conclusions about licensee’s compliance with its design basis. The conclusions are based on the Licensee Report as well as on several decades of regulatory oversight, including regulatory inspections, evaluations of various applications for modification of the licences, regulatory control of the special Long-Term Operation programme and the various extensive Periodic Safety Reviews. The National Report presents conclusions on the safety margins identified in the Licensee Report. The National report notes the measures proposed and considered in the Licensee Report. In principle, the regulatory body can endorse various of these measures, but further assessment is needed to establish the effectiveness of these. The regulatory body proposes additional topics suitable for (more detailed) assessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Wind Worldwide Regulatory Framework in Selected Countries
    Offshore Wind Worldwide Regulatory Framework in Selected Countries Offshore Wind Worldwide Regulatory Framework in Selected Countries 1st Edition February 2020 Contributing editor: Dr Christian Knütel Partner, Hogan Lovells Hamburg Hogan Lovells International LLP Alstertor 21 20095 Hamburg T +49 40 419 93 0 4 Hogan Lovells Foreword The World Forum Offshore Wind (WFO) is of offshore wind farms across Europe has delighted to have co-edited this handbook proven the technology’s maturity. This was together with our WFO member Hogan impressively demonstrated by the first Lovells. Given the offshore wind industry’s completion of an offshore wind farm’s life global expansion over the past years, this cycle when the Danish Vindeby project was publication is highly relevant to all offshore decommissioned in 2017 after 26 years of wind market participants. While only ten successful offshore operation. years ago, offshore wind was a niche industry limited to a few European countries, we have The global support for offshore wind far since then witnessed the global breakthrough beyond its European core markets clearly of offshore wind as an essential technology illustrates the trust that governments from for electricity generation in order to reduce around the world have in offshore wind as a global CO2 emissions. This successful source of clean electricity generation. Today development over the past decade has been offshore wind turbines are up and running in driven by three major factors: cost countries across Asia, North America and reductions, technical maturity and global Europe. New markets such as South Korea, support. Vietnam, India, Australia or Brazil are taking concrete steps to introduce regulations for The cost reductions for offshore wind seen in the development of domestic commercial- 2017, 2018 and 2019 have been truly scale offshore wind projects.
    [Show full text]
  • GWEC – Global Wind Report | Annual Market Update 2014
    GLOBAL WIND REPORT ANNUAL MARKET UPDATE 2014 Navigating the global wind power market The Global Wind Energy Council is the international trade association for the wind power industry – communicating the benefits of wind power to national governments, policy makers and international institutions. GWEC provides authoritative research and analysis on the wind power industry in more than 80 countries around the world. Keep up to date with the most recent market insights: Global Wind Statistics 2014 February 2015 Global Wind Report 2014 March 2015 Global Wind Energy Outlook 2014 October 2014 Offshore Wind Policy and Market Assessment – A Global Outlook February 2015 Our mission is to ensure that wind power establishes itself as the answer to today‘s energy challenges, providing substantial venvironmental and economic benefits. GWEC represents the industry with or at the UNFCCC, the IEA, international financial institutions, the IPCC and IRENA. GWEC – opening up the frontiers follow us on TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword. 4 Making the Commitment to Renewable Energy. 5 Global Status of Wind Power in 2014 . 6 Market Forecast for 2015 – 2019. 16 Green bonds offer exciting opportunities for the wind sector . .22 Emerging Africa . .26 Australia . .30 Brazil . 32 Canada. .34 Chile . .36 PR China . .38 Denmark . .42 The European Union . .44 France . .46 Germany. .48 Global offshore . 52 India . .58 Italy . .60 Japan . .62 Mexico . .64 Poland . .66 South Africa . .68 Sweden . 70 Turkey . 72 United Kingdom. 74 United States . 76 About GWEC . 78 GWEC – Global Wind 2014 Report 3 FOREWORD 014 was a great year for the wind industry, setting a The two big stories in 2014 and going forward continue 2new record of more than 51 GW installed in a single to be the precipitous drop in the price of oil, and growing year, bringing the global total close to 370 GW.
    [Show full text]
  • 141210 Borssele NPP LTO License Final
    Unofficial translation Decision: AMENDMENT OF THE NUCLEAR ENERGY ACT LICENCE GRANTED TO N.V. ELEKTRICITEITS-PRODUKTIEMAATSCHAPPIJ ZUID-NEDERLAND (NV EPZ) FOR THE EXTENSION OF THE DESIGN LIFETIME OF THE Borssele Nuclear Power Plant (Long Term Operation) Granted by: THE MINISTER OF ECONOMIC AFFAIRS OF THE NETHERLANDS UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION CONTENTS 1 THE DECISION 3 1.1 LICENCE 3 1.2 APPLICATION DOCUMENTS FORMING PART OF THE LICENCE 3 1.3 CONDITIONS ATTACHED TO THE LICENCE 4 1.4 ENTRY INTO FORCE OF THE DECISION 8 2 THE APPLICATION 9 2.1 THE APPLICATION DOCUMENTS 9 2.2 CONTENT OF THE APPLICATION AS INDICATED BY NV EPZ 10 2.3 EX OFFICIO REVISION OF CONDITIONS 10 3 LEGISLATION AND PROCEDURES 12 3.1 APPLICABLE LAWS AND REGULATIONS 12 3.2 THE PROCEDURE 13 4 ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK FOR AMENDMENT OF THE LICENCE 15 4.1 EXTENDED DESIGN LIFETIME : THE BACKGROUND 15 4.1.1 What does extended design lifetime entail? 15 4.1.2 Extended design lifetime: the international context 15 4.1.3 Different types of safety reviews 16 4.2 ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK 18 4.2.1 Justification and radiation protection 18 4.2.2 Safety and IAEA guidelines 18 4.2.3 Management & Organization (Safety Factors 10 and 12) 20 5 THE ASSESSMENT OF THE APPLICATION 21 5.1 JUSTIFICATION 21 5.2 SAFETY AND RADIATION PROTECTION 21 6 VIEWS EXPRESSED TO THE DRAFT DECISION 27 6.1 VIEWS EXPRESSED 27 6.2 GENERAL RESPONSE TO VIEWS EXPRESSED 27 6.3 DIFFERENT TYPES OF SAFETY REVIEWS 29 6.4 RESPONSE TO VIEWS EXPRESSED 32 6.4.1 Topic 1: Procedure 32 6.4.2 Topic 2: General Drawbacks of Nuclear Energy 41 6.4.3 Topic 3: Outdated Design of the Nuclear Power Plant 47 6.4.4 Topic 4: Nuclear Safety and Ageing Management 54 6.4.5 Topic 5: Miscellaneous 65 6.5 CONCLUSION IN RESPONSE TO THE VIEWS EXPRESSED 66 7 FINAL CONCLUSION 67 ANNEX A: GLOSSARY 68 ANNEX B: LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 70 2 UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION 1 The Decision 1.1 Licence Under Section 15 b.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to the Future of Wind Energy: Siemens Gamesa to Deploy Powerful Next Generation Platform in Sweden by 2021
    Press Release December 13, 2019 Welcome to the future of wind energy: Siemens Gamesa to deploy powerful next generation platform in Sweden by 2021 - Landmark order for the 231 MW Skaftåsen project in Sweden brings to market the most powerful geared onshore wind turbine - 35 units of the SG 5.8-155 to be installed with flexible power rating operating at 6.6 MW, and they will be covered by a 30-year full-service agreement - Digitized turbine control will drive improved performance, even in extreme weather conditions Siemens Gamesa is launching a new era for wind power with a deal to supply the most powerful geared onshore wind turbine ever, the SG 5.8-155 wind turbine. The first of the 35 units, all with flexible power rating operating at 6.6 MW, will be installed in the second quarter of 2021 in the Skaftåsen project in Sweden, the first in the world to feature the Siemens Gamesa 5.X platform. Project developer Arise AB and leading infrastructure investment manager Foresight Group LLP (“Foresight”) have chosen this latest generation of onshore turbines due to its strong performance and advanced design, combining reliability with maximum Annual Energy Production (AEP) for the lowest LCoE. With a 30-year full-service agreement, this new generation of onshore wind turbines will generate predictable revenue streams over its lifecycle, improving the business case of the project. The 231 MW order marks the debut of the Siemens Gamesa 5.X platform, only months after its presentation in April 2019, during WindEurope Bilbao trade fair. It reinforces the company’s leading position in the Swedish market, one of the most dynamic in Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Targets Key for Investment
    Launch simulation and optimization solution for Onshore Wind. Please visit our stand 1-C41 3 April 2019 LiVE @ WINDEUROPE 2019 Brexit just noise for TRENDING ON bullish UK offshore Uncertainty about how and when the Renewable targets UK will leave the European Union is LIVE@ WE 2019 having negligible impact on interest from offshore wind developers in the coming Contracts for Difference auction, key for investment Service smiles on Deutsche WindEurope 2019 has heard. p2 Windtechnik in Spain Siemens Gamesa chief The Spanish arm of Deutsche executive Markus Tacke Windtechnik has added 213 turbines has challenged national to its service portfolio covering a range governments to set clearer of models. Maintenance contracts have renewable energy targets. been agreed for wind farms totalling The wind industry will 274MW located in different regions struggle to justify investments comprising 130 Siemens Gamesa G80 without being offered better and G52 machines, 40 NEG Micon guidance from individual NM52 and 43 Vestas V90 units. countries, he told delegates at the opening session ROYAL ASSENT: King Felipe European Union,” he said. Portugal eyes 3GW wind boost WindEurope 2019. VI of Spain, pictured (second “It has a geography of 50 Portugal expects to increase its wind Coal cost parity ‘huge Tacke said the European left) meeting senior million hectares including generation capacity to 8GW or 9GW milestone’ for wind Union’s goal of generating executives in Bilbao vast areas that are sparsely by 2030, according to Environment Wind power is now as cheap as coal- 32% of the bloc’s electricity including Markus Tacke populated. It has both Minister Joao Pedro Matos Fernandes.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Power a Victim of Policy and Politics
    NNoottee ddee ll’’IIffrrii Wind Power A Victim of Policy and Politics ______________________________________________________________________ Maïté Jauréguy-Naudin October 2010 . Gouvernance européenne et géopolitique de l’énergie The Institut français des relations internationales (Ifri) is a research center and a forum for debate on major international political and economic issues. Headed by Thierry de Montbrial since its founding in 1979, Ifri is a non- governmental and a non-profit organization. As an independent think tank, Ifri sets its own research agenda, publishing its findings regularly for a global audience. Using an interdisciplinary approach, Ifri brings together political and economic decision-makers, researchers and internationally renowned experts to animate its debate and research activities. With offices in Paris and Brussels, Ifri stands out as one of the rare French think tanks to have positioned itself at the very heart of European debate. The opinions expressed in this text are the responsibility of the author alone. ISBN: 978-2-86592-780-7 © All rights reserved, Ifri, 2010 IFRI IFRI-BRUXELLES 27, RUE DE LA PROCESSION RUE MARIE-THERESE, 21 75740 PARIS CEDEX 15 – FRANCE 1000 – BRUXELLES – BELGIQUE Tel: +33 (0)1 40 61 60 00 Tel: +32 (0)2 238 51 10 Fax: +33 (0)1 40 61 60 60 Fax: +32 (0)2 238 51 15 Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] WEBSITE: Ifri.org Executive Summary In December 2008, as part of the fight against climate change, the European Union adopted the Energy and Climate package that endorsed three objectives toward 2020: a 20% increase in energy efficiency, a 20% reduction in GHG emissions (compared to 1990), and a 20% share of renewables in final energy consumption.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Power Research in Wikipedia
    Scientometrics Wind power research in Wikipedia: Does Wikipedia demonstrate direct influence of research publications and can it be used as adequate source in research evaluation? --Manuscript Draft-- Manuscript Number: SCIM-D-17-00020R2 Full Title: Wind power research in Wikipedia: Does Wikipedia demonstrate direct influence of research publications and can it be used as adequate source in research evaluation? Article Type: Manuscript Keywords: Wikipedia references; Wikipedia; Wind power research; Web of Science records; Research evaluation; Scientometric indicators Corresponding Author: Peter Ingwersen, PhD, D.Ph., h.c. University of Copenhagen Copenhagen S, DENMARK Corresponding Author Secondary Information: Corresponding Author's Institution: University of Copenhagen Corresponding Author's Secondary Institution: First Author: Antonio E. Serrano-Lopez, PhD First Author Secondary Information: Order of Authors: Antonio E. Serrano-Lopez, PhD Peter Ingwersen, PhD, D.Ph., h.c. Elias Sanz-Casado, PhD Order of Authors Secondary Information: Funding Information: This research was funded by the Spanish Professor Elias Sanz-Casado Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (CSO 2014-51916-C2-1-R) Abstract: Aim: This paper is a result of the WOW project (Wind power On Wikipedia) which forms part of the SAPIENS (Scientometric Analyses of the Productivity and Impact of Eco-economy of Spain) Project (Sanz-Casado et al., 2013). WOW is designed to observe the relationship between scholarly publications and societal impact or visibility through the mentions
    [Show full text]