DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural Resource Inventory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Natural Resource Inventory Upper Saco Valley Land Trust Resource Inventory Dan Sperduto & Peter Ellis Sperduto Ecological Services LLC Ellis Ecological Services LLC May 2011 Submitted to the Upper Saco Valley Land Trust Sperduto Ecological Services LLC 359 Baptist Road Canterbury NH 03224 [email protected] Ellis Ecological Services LLC Mt. Rainier, MD [email protected] Cover Photo: Top: Saco River in Conway, with River Channel and Floodplain Forests. Bottom: Pitch Pine (Pinus rigida) at the top of Jockey Cap, a Rocky Ridge in Fryeburg, Maine, with Lovewell Pond in the background. Above: Silver Lake, Jackman Ridge (light green foreground), and surrounding Pitch/Mixed Pine Plains between Silver and Ossipee Lakes (darker surrounding area ). This illustrates the effects of soils on tree composition: hardwoods dominate on fine glacial till soils on Jackman Ridge whereas pine trees dominate on the coarse, sandy outwash soils elsewhere. The former are productive hardwood soils, whereas the latter are productive softwood soils. All photos © Dan Sperduto (or Dan Sperduto for NH Natural Heritage Bureau). 2 Contents Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 6 1.Methods ..................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Natural Community & Wildlife Habitat Model ................................................................................... 7 Map Units .............................................................................................................................................. 7 Derivation: Inputs & Interpretation of Layers ...................................................................................... 9 1.2 Co-occurrence Analysis and Resource Data Model .......................................................................... 14 Selected Input layers and Their Scoring Schemes .............................................................................. 14 Scoring Adjustments Based on Ecological Integrity Analysis .............................................................. 21 1.3 Focus Areas ....................................................................................................................................... 30 Approach to delineation ..................................................................................................................... 31 2.Results ...................................................................................................................................................... 34 2.1 Ecological Overview of Service Area ................................................................................................. 34 Setting ................................................................................................................................................. 34 Ecological Diversity ............................................................................................................................. 35 2.2 Natural Communities & Wildlife Habitats......................................................................................... 37 Definition ............................................................................................................................................ 37 Descriptions ........................................................................................................................................ 37 2.3 Other Resource Data Model Input Layer Maps ................................................................................ 69 2.4 Focus Areas ....................................................................................................................................... 75 References ................................................................................................................................................ 101 Appendices ................................................................................................................................................ 102 Appendix 1: New Hampshire- Maine Natural Community Cross-Reference ........................................ 103 Appendix 2: Maps ................................................................................................................................. 111 Appendix 3: Acreage and Conservation Land Status for Input Layer Features in Draft Focus Areas ... 112 3 Acknowledgements Special thanks to the Upper Saco Valley Land Trust Resource Inventory Committee for their guidance and input throughout this Phase I of the Resource Inventory: Larry Garland, Tom Gross, Wink Lees, Tom Earle, and Jess Charpentier. Thanks also to Tony Federer, Dave Publicover, and Brian Fowler, who provided helpful technical input at meetings with the Resource Inventory Committee. Thanks to the Board of Directors, as well as Kori Marchowsky for their support and feedback at early meetings. Many thanks to the long list of data providers and staff employees at those organizations: New Hampshire GRANIT; the Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS; Maine and New Hampshire offices); Maine GIS Data Catalog, Larry Garland and the Appalachian Mountain Club, the New Hampshire Natural Heritage Bureau (NHNHB), the Maine Natural Areas Program (MENAP; including Lisa St. Hiliare and Andy Cutko), the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (MEDIFW), New Hampshire Fish and Game Department (NHF&G), the Nature Conservancy, and the New Hampshire Audubon Society. Bill Leak (USDA Forest Service) and Joe Homer (NRCS) provided additional information on soils, and Jeff Lougee at TNC shared local maps of natural communities. Finally, we extend many thanks to the Upper Saco Valley Land Trust and an anonymous donor for funding this project. Executive Summary The Resource Inventory presented in this report is Phase I of a Strategic Conservation Planning effort by the Upper Saco Valley Land Trust (USVLT). Future phases will build on the foundation of the Resource Inventory by soliciting input and engagement from local conservation partners and stakeholders, considering additional resource values not explicitly incorporated into the Resource Inventory, and prioritizing among conservation opportunities. The mission of USVLT is to preserve the ecological systems and cultural values of the Upper Saco River Valley, including the continued well-being and availability of land for farming, forestry, recreation, education, as well as land remaining in its natural state for the benefit of natural and human communities. The main goals of the Resource Inventory were to consolidate geographic information on the natural and cultural features of the landscape, and identify areas that contain critical or high resource values. We began by combining separate Geographic Information System (GIS) data layers from the respective states to obtain a set of seamless GIS maps covering the entire service area for each particular feature pertinent to the USVLT mission. Differences in data availability, coverage, or content limited the number of resources that could be incorporated into the analysis during Phase I. Ultimately, we included twelve layers in the subsequent analyses (alphabetical order): Aquifers; Brook Trout Headwaters; Farmland and Other Openings; Great Pond Shorelines; Important Bird Areas; Natural Communities and Wildlife Habitats; Open Wetlands; Prime Farmland Soils; Productive Forest Soils; Riparian Zones; Rare Plants, Animals, and Exemplary Natural Communities; and Unfragmented Forest Blocks. The USVLT Resource 4 Inventory Committee was instrumental in selecting and assigning score values to features within each of these layers relevant to the USVLT mission. Eleven of these layers were based on or interpolated from existing data layers. The Natural Community and Wildlife Habitat map is a novel data layer derived during this project through an analysis and interpretation of nine data sources. This map allowed us to distill and integrate key physical and biological attributes of the landscape from many independent sources into a single GIS layer. In so doing, we avoided some potential redundancy, coverage gaps, and methodological differences among data layers if they had been used individually. Natural communities and wildlife habitats can be interpreted and compared on the basis of factors such as rarity, geographic distribution, biological importance, and the ecological integrity or health of individual examples at multiple geographic scales (global, state, and local). These attributes were useful in assigning values in the second stage of the Resource Inventory. The next stage involved constructing a Resource Data Model (RDM) to identify areas where many features of value co-occur in the landscape, or occur in close proximity. The “co-occurrence” analysis involves assigning numerical scores to features within each of the twelve resource layers and overlaying and summing the feature scores to obtain a single map depicting areas of high to low score values. For example, a high score would result where multiple features of conservation interest
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Official List of Public Waters
    Official List of Public Waters New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services Water Division Dam Bureau 29 Hazen Drive PO Box 95 Concord, NH 03302-0095 (603) 271-3406 https://www.des.nh.gov NH Official List of Public Waters Revision Date October 9, 2020 Robert R. Scott, Commissioner Thomas E. O’Donovan, Division Director OFFICIAL LIST OF PUBLIC WATERS Published Pursuant to RSA 271:20 II (effective June 26, 1990) IMPORTANT NOTE: Do not use this list for determining water bodies that are subject to the Comprehensive Shoreland Protection Act (CSPA). The CSPA list is available on the NHDES website. Public waters in New Hampshire are prescribed by common law as great ponds (natural waterbodies of 10 acres or more in size), public rivers and streams, and tidal waters. These common law public waters are held by the State in trust for the people of New Hampshire. The State holds the land underlying great ponds and tidal waters (including tidal rivers) in trust for the people of New Hampshire. Generally, but with some exceptions, private property owners hold title to the land underlying freshwater rivers and streams, and the State has an easement over this land for public purposes. Several New Hampshire statutes further define public waters as including artificial impoundments 10 acres or more in size, solely for the purpose of applying specific statutes. Most artificial impoundments were created by the construction of a dam, but some were created by actions such as dredging or as a result of urbanization (usually due to the effect of road crossings obstructing flow and increased runoff from the surrounding area).
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Landscapes of Maine a Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems
    Natural Landscapes of Maine A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems by Susan Gawler and Andrew Cutko Natural Landscapes of Maine A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems by Susan Gawler and Andrew Cutko Copyright © 2010 by the Maine Natural Areas Program, Maine Department of Conservation 93 State House Station, Augusta, Maine 04333-0093 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system without written permission from the authors or the Maine Natural Areas Program, except for inclusion of brief quotations in a review. Illustrations and photographs are used with permission and are copyright by the contributors. Images cannot be reproduced without expressed written consent of the contributor. ISBN 0-615-34739-4 To cite this document: Gawler, S. and A. Cutko. 2010. Natural Landscapes of Maine: A Guide to Natural Communities and Ecosystems. Maine Natural Areas Program, Maine Department of Conservation, Augusta, Maine. Cover photo: Circumneutral Riverside Seep on the St. John River, Maine Printed and bound in Maine using recycled, chlorine-free paper Contents Page Acknowledgements ..................................................................................... 3 Foreword ..................................................................................................... 4 Introduction ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire— New County, for Carroll Needs Hazard Mapping of Flood —Scoping
    Flynn, R.H. Prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 1 —Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire— Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire Open-File Report 2006–1236 Open-File Report 2006–1236 U.S. Department of the Interior Printed on recycled paper U.S. Geological Survey Scoping of Flood Hazard Mapping Needs for Carroll County, New Hampshire By Robert H. Flynn Prepared for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region 1 Open-File Report 2006–1236 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services Box 25286, Denver Federal Center Denver, CO 80225 For more information about the USGS and its products: Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/ Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Acknowledgments The author thanks Debra Foster for her assistance in contacting towns in Carroll County to obtain preliminary scoping needs information and for editing this report, Laura Hayes for her assistance in entering effective stream information for Carroll County into the WISE (Watershed Information SystEm) Scoping module, and Ann Marie Squillacci and Tina Cotton for their help in publishing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • NHDOT Natural Resource Agency Coordination Meeting
    BUREAU OF ENVIRONMENT CONFERENCE REPORT SUBJECT: NHDOT Monthly Natural Resource Agency Coordination Meeting DATE OF CONFERENCE: August 17, 2016 LOCATION OF CONFERENCE: John O. Morton Building ATTENDED BY: NHDOT Army Corps of Engineers NH Fish & Game Matt Urban Michael Hicks Carol Henderson Sarah Large Heidi Holman Ron Crickard EPA NHB/DRED Tony Weatherbee Mark Kern Amy Lamb Marc Laurin Chris Carucco FHWA Consultants/Public Trent Zanes Jamie Sikora Participants Mike Dugas Mark Hasselmann Peter Pitsas Kirk Mudgett Allison Reese Victoria Chase NHDES Peter Walker Jennifer Reczek Gino Infascelli Christine Perron Gerry Bedard Lori Sommer Rebecca Martin PRESENTATIONS/ PROJECTS REVIEWED THIS MONTH: (minutes on subsequent pages) th Finalization of June 15 2016 Meeting Minutes ................................................................................ 2 Conway, 40018 Main Street Infrastructure Improvements (Non-Federal) ......................................... 2 Dixville, 41077 (Bridge #182/070) (Non-Federal)............................................................................. 3 Manchester, 16099 (I-293 Exit 6 & 7) (Non-Federal) ........................................................................ 4 Loudon-Canterbury 29613 (X-A004(201)) ........................................................................................ 7 Ossipee, 10431 (X-MGS_NHS_X_T-0271(032)) .............................................................................. 9 Manchester/ Bedford Mitigation Wildlife Habitat ..........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • As Time Passes Over the Land
    s Time Passes over theLand A White Mountain Art As Time Passes over the Land is published on the occasion of the exhibition As Time Passes over the Land presented at the Karl Drerup Art Gallery, Plymouth State University, Plymouth, NH February 8–April 11, 2011 This exhibition showcases the multifaceted nature of exhibitions and collections featured in the new Museum of the White Mountains, opening at Plymouth State University in 2012 The Museum of the White Mountains will preserve and promote the unique history, culture, and environmental legacy of the region, as well as provide unique collections-based, archival, and digital learning resources serving researchers, students, and the public. Project Director: Catherine S. Amidon Curator: Marcia Schmidt Blaine Text by Marcia Schmidt Blaine and Mark Green Edited by Jennifer Philion and Rebecca Chappell Designed by Sandra Coe Photography by John Hession Printed and bound by Penmor Lithographers Front cover The Crawford Valley from Mount Willard, 1877 Frank Henry Shapleigh Oil on canvas, 21 x 36 inches From the collection of P. Andrews and Linda H. McLane © 2011 Mount Washington from Intervale, North Conway, First Snow, 1851 Willhelm Heine Oil on canvas, 6 x 12 inches Private collection Haying in the Pemigewasset Valley, undated Samuel W. Griggs Oil on canvas, 18 x 30 inches Private collection Plymouth State University is proud to present As Time Passes over the about rural villages and urban perceptions, about stories and historical Land, an exhibit that celebrates New Hampshire’s splendid heritage of events that shaped the region, about environmental change—As Time White Mountain School of painting.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Vacation Times at Chocorua Camping Village & Wabanaki Lodge & the Greater Ossipee - Chocorua Mountain Region for Toll-Free Reservations 1-888-237-8642 Vol
    Great Vacation Times at Chocorua Camping Village & Wabanaki Lodge & the Greater Ossipee - Chocorua Mountain Region For Toll-Free reservaTions 1-888-237-8642 Vol. 19 No. 1 GPS: 893 White Mountain Hwy, Tamworth, NH 03886 PO Box 484, Chocorua, NH 03817 email: [email protected] Tel. 1-888-BEST NHCampground (1-888-237-8642) or 603-323-8536 www.ChocoruaCamping.com www.WhiteMountainsLodging.com We Trust That You’ll Our Awesome Park! Escape the noisy rush of the city. Pack up and leave home on a get-away adventure! Come join the vacation tradition of our spacious, forested Chocorua Camping Village KOA! Miles of nature trails, a lake-size pond and river to explore by kayak. We offer activities all week with Theme Weekends to keep the kids and family entertained. Come by tent, pop-up, RV, or glamp-it-up in new Tipis, off-the-grid cabins or enjoy easing into full-amenity lodges. #BringTheDog #Adulting Young Couples... RVers Rave about their Families who Camp Together - Experience at CCV Stay Together, even when apart ...often attest to the rustic, lakeside cabins of You have undoubtedly worked long and hard to earn Why is it that both parents and children look forward Wabanaki Lodge as being the Sangri-La of the White ownership of the RV you now enjoy. We at Chocorua with such excitement and enthusiasm to their frequent Mountains where they can enjoy a simple cabin along Camping Village-KOA appreciate and respect that fact; weekends and camping vacations at Chocorua Camping the shore of Moores Pond, nestled in the privacy of a we would love to reward your achievement with the Village—KOA? woodland pine grove.
    [Show full text]
  • Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities
    Curt Teich Postcard Archives Towns and Cities Alaska Aialik Bay Alaska Highway Alcan Highway Anchorage Arctic Auk Lake Cape Prince of Wales Castle Rock Chilkoot Pass Columbia Glacier Cook Inlet Copper River Cordova Curry Dawson Denali Denali National Park Eagle Fairbanks Five Finger Rapids Gastineau Channel Glacier Bay Glenn Highway Haines Harding Gateway Homer Hoonah Hurricane Gulch Inland Passage Inside Passage Isabel Pass Juneau Katmai National Monument Kenai Kenai Lake Kenai Peninsula Kenai River Kechikan Ketchikan Creek Kodiak Kodiak Island Kotzebue Lake Atlin Lake Bennett Latouche Lynn Canal Matanuska Valley McKinley Park Mendenhall Glacier Miles Canyon Montgomery Mount Blackburn Mount Dewey Mount McKinley Mount McKinley Park Mount O’Neal Mount Sanford Muir Glacier Nome North Slope Noyes Island Nushagak Opelika Palmer Petersburg Pribilof Island Resurrection Bay Richardson Highway Rocy Point St. Michael Sawtooth Mountain Sentinal Island Seward Sitka Sitka National Park Skagway Southeastern Alaska Stikine Rier Sulzer Summit Swift Current Taku Glacier Taku Inlet Taku Lodge Tanana Tanana River Tok Tunnel Mountain Valdez White Pass Whitehorse Wrangell Wrangell Narrow Yukon Yukon River General Views—no specific location Alabama Albany Albertville Alexander City Andalusia Anniston Ashford Athens Attalla Auburn Batesville Bessemer Birmingham Blue Lake Blue Springs Boaz Bobler’s Creek Boyles Brewton Bridgeport Camden Camp Hill Camp Rucker Carbon Hill Castleberry Centerville Centre Chapman Chattahoochee Valley Cheaha State Park Choctaw County
    [Show full text]
  • FF Oo Ll Ll Oo Ww Uu Ss
    VOLUME 38, NUMBER 4 JUNE 27, 2013 FREE THE WEEKLY NEWS & LIFESTYLE JOURNAL OF MT. WASHINGTON VALLEY Great Glen Trails Follllow us...... Guided Tours Daily Avoid the Crowds! www.greatglentrails.com (603) 466-2333 Drive your own car Guided Tours Outfitters Shop Glen View Café Rt. 16, Pinkham Notch www.mtwashingtonautoroad.com A SALMON PRESS PUBLICATION • (603) 447-6336 • PUBLISHED IN CONWAY, NH (603) 466-3988 Valley Feature Ham Radio operators light up when the power is down By Rachael Brown many stations on any and all ateur Station at the Town of amateur bands to learn to op- Conway EOC. Herm Weber, Ham radio operators do erate in abnormal situations, in liaison to N.H. Homeland anything but clown around. less than stellar situations, he Security Emergency Man- You see, the amateur radio op- adds. agement in Concord and Art erators provide a highly skilled “Our club’s first Field Day Smith KB1TX, digital liaison and professional service to the was 2007 at Mud Football Sta- to N.H. ARES. community. When the lights dium. We were there for two Activation is though a go out or the entire electri- years, and then moved to Tin call tree, on air activation or cal grid is down because of an Mountain,” says Fitch, adding self-activation, Quigley says. emergency or disaster, com- the club restarted in December When an emergency or di- munications are provided by a 2005. The operators show the saster happens we receive a dedicated group of volunteers public how they communicate call, e-mail- if those modes are known as Ham Radio Opera- when commercial power is out.
    [Show full text]
  • GRANIT 7.5' Quad Tile Index 1 2 3
    GRANIT 7.5' Quad Tile Index 1 2 3 1 GREELEY BROOK 108 DANBURY 4 5 6 7 2 PROSPECT HILL 109 BRISTOL PITTSBURG 3 MOOSE BOG 110 WINNISQUAM LAKE 4 METALLAK MOUNTAIN 111 LACONIA 5 COWEN HILL 112 WEST ALTON 6 SECOND CONNECTICUT LAKE 113 WOLFEBORO 8 9 10 11 7 RUMP MTN 114 SANBORNVILLE 8 PITTSBURG 115 GREAT EAST LAKE CLARKSVILLE ATKINSON & 9 LAKE FRANCIS 116 WINDSOR GILMANTON 10 MAGALLOWAY MOUNTAIN 117 CLAREMONT NORTH 11 BOSEBUCK MTN 118 GRANTHAM STEWARTSTOWN 12 13 14 15T SECOND 16 12 MONADNOCK MTN, VT-NH 119 SUNAPEE LAKE NORTH N A COLLEGE R G GRANT 13 LOVERING MOUNTAIN 120 NEW LONDON COLEBROOK S ' X DIXVILLE I 14 DIAMOND POND 121 ANDOVER D 15 MOUNT PISGAH 122 FRANKLIN 16 WILSONS MILLS 123 NORTHFIELD WENTWORTHS COLUMBIA LOCATION 17 BLOOMFIELD 124 BELMONT 17 18 1ER9VINGS 20 21 22 18 TINKERVILLE 125 GILMANTON IRON WORKS LOCATION 19 BLUE MOUNTAIN 126 ALTON MILLSFIELD ERROL 20 DIXVILLE NOTCH 127 FARMINGTON 21 ERROL 128 MILTON ODELL 22 UMBAGOG LAKE NORTH 129 SPRINGFIELD STRATFORD 23 MAIDSTONE LAKE 130 CLAREMONT SOUTH 23 24 25 26 27 28 DUMMER 24 STRATFORD 131 NEWPORT CAMBRIDGE 25 PERCY PEAKS 132 SUNAPEE LAKES D N A 26 DUMMER PONDS 133 BRADFORD L R E B 27 TEAKETTLE RIDGE 134 WARNER M STARK U H 28 UMBAGOG LAKE SOUTH 135 WEBSTER T MILAN R 29 O 30 31 32 33 29 GROVETON 136 PENACOOK N 30 STARK 137 LOUDON Y 31 WEST MILAN 138 PITTSFIELD N N E K BERLIN SUCCESS L 32 MILAN 139 PARKER MOUNTAIN I LANCASTER K 33 SUCCESS POND 140 BAXTER LAKE 34 MILES POND 141 ROCHESTER 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 35 LANCASTER W 142 SOMERSWORTH GORHAM RANDOLPH D A L T O N JEFFERSON 36 LANCASTER E 143 BELLOWS FALLS SHELBURNE 37 PLINY RANGE W 144 ALSTEAD WHITEFIELD 38 PLINY RANGE E 145 EAST LEMPSTER MARTINS 39 BERLIN 146 WASHINGTON LITTLETON CARROLL LOW & LOCATION & .
    [Show full text]
  • MOTHS and BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed Distributional Information Has Been J.D
    MOTHS AND BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed distributional information has been J.D. Lafontaine published for only a few groups of Lepidoptera in western Biological Resources Program, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. Scott (1986) gives good distribution maps for Canada butterflies in North America but these are generalized shade Central Experimental Farm Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 maps that give no detail within the Montane Cordillera Ecozone. A series of memoirs on the Inchworms (family and Geometridae) of Canada by McGuffin (1967, 1972, 1977, 1981, 1987) and Bolte (1990) cover about 3/4 of the Canadian J.T. Troubridge fauna and include dot maps for most species. A long term project on the “Forest Lepidoptera of Canada” resulted in a Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (Agassiz) four volume series on Lepidoptera that feed on trees in Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Canada and these also give dot maps for most species Box 1000, Agassiz, B.C. V0M 1A0 (McGugan, 1958; Prentice, 1962, 1963, 1965). Dot maps for three groups of Cutworm Moths (Family Noctuidae): the subfamily Plusiinae (Lafontaine and Poole, 1991), the subfamilies Cuculliinae and Psaphidinae (Poole, 1995), and ABSTRACT the tribe Noctuini (subfamily Noctuinae) (Lafontaine, 1998) have also been published. Most fascicles in The Moths of The Montane Cordillera Ecozone of British Columbia America North of Mexico series (e.g. Ferguson, 1971-72, and southwestern Alberta supports a diverse fauna with over 1978; Franclemont, 1973; Hodges, 1971, 1986; Lafontaine, 2,000 species of butterflies and moths (Order Lepidoptera) 1987; Munroe, 1972-74, 1976; Neunzig, 1986, 1990, 1997) recorded to date.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
    WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
    [Show full text]
  • Moose Lake Report 2006
    Collection of Lepidoptera at Moose Lake Provincial Park in 2006 C. Bruce Christensen, June 1, 2008 5702 43 A ST. Vegreville, AB, T9C 1E3 [email protected] Description of Moose Lake Provincial Park Moose Lake Provincial Park is located approximately 15 km SW of Bonnyville, Alberta, Canada in the northern boreal forest at coordinates 54.16, 110.54. The park consists of numerous inter-mixed habitats, including jack pine, paper birch, poplar, white spruce, black spruce bog, sand dune, flowering shrubs and other trees, and beach areas with forbs and sedge growth. Dead Man’s Point is a very densely forested area of Moose Lake Provincial Park. Cattails, forbs and sedges and shrubs lead up to the forested areas from the lake. Selection of Location and Sites Moose Lake is within 50 km of the Alberta-Saskatchewan border, which increases the probability of finding new species for Alberta. The park is reasonably level throughout with numerous well-groomed trails for easy access (all sites accessible by walking or road vehicle). This reduces the cost of accessing the sites. Each trap site was selected to maximize the diversity of habitats in an attempt to collect the largest variety of lepidopteran species. 2 Moose Lake Provincial Park is located west of Bonnyville in Alberta, Canada Collection Purpose The purpose of this study was to collect and identify a cross-section of the lepidopteran species indigenous to the Moose Lake area and to mount one or more specimens of each species for archival purposes in the Strickland Museum, University of Alberta. Collection Techniques Several collection techniques were used to obtain a more complete profile of the species of the area.
    [Show full text]