DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix G Identification of Target Species and Focused Conservation Plans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix G Identification of Target Species and Focused Conservation Plans Appendix G. Identification of Target Species and Focused Conservation Plans STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES This page left blank intentionally. CVFPP Conservation Strategy Appendix G. Identification of Target Species and Focused Conservation Plans Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ......................................................................................................... G-1 2.0 Selection of Target Species ................................................................................ G-1 3.0 Identification of Target Species for Focused Conservation Planning .................. G-2 3.1 Development of Focused Conservation Plans .................................................. G-14 4.0 References ........................................................................................................ G-16 5.0 Acronyms and Other Abbreviations ................................................................... G-17 List of Tables Table 2-1. Screening of Animal Species Potentially Affected by CVFPP (including the Conservation Strategy) for Target Species and Focused Conservation Planning ........................................................................... G-3 Table 2-2. Screening of Plant Species Potentially Affected by CVFPP (including the Conservation Strategy) for Target Species and Focused Conservation Planning ........................................................................... G-9 Table 2-3. Distribution of Proposed Target Species and Focused Conservation Plans .................................................................................................... G-13 July 2016 G-i Appendix G. Identification of Target Species and CVFPP Conservation Strategy Focused Conservation Plans Attachments G1. Focused Conservation Plan: Delta Button-Celery G2. Focused Conservation Plan: Slough Thistle G3. Focused Conservation Plan: Valley Elderberry Longhorn Beetle G4. Focused Conservation Plan: California Central Valley Steelhead G5. Focused Conservation Plan: Central Valley Fall-/Late Fall–Run Chinook Salmon G6. Focused Conservation Plan: Central Valley Spring-Run Chinook Salmon G7. Focused Conservation Plan: Sacramento River Winter-Run Chinook Salmon G8. Focused Conservation Plan: Southern Distinct Population Segment of the North American Green Sturgeon G9. Focused Conservation Plan: Giant Garter Snake G10. Focused Conservation Plan: Bank Swallow G11. Focused Conservation Plan: California Black Rail G12. Focused Conservation Plan: Greater Sandhill Crane G13. Focused Conservation Plan: Least Bell’s Vireo G14. Focused Conservation Plan: Swainson’s Hawk G15. Focused Conservation Plan: Western Yellow-Billed Cuckoo G16. Focused Conservation Plan: Riparian Brush Rabbit G17. Focused Conservation Plan: Riparian (San Joaquin Valley) Woodrat . G-ii July 2016 CVFPP Conservation Strategy Appendix G. Identification of Target Species and Focused Conservation Plans 1.0 Introduction The purpose of the Conservation Strategy of the Central Valley Flood Protection Plan (CVFPP) is to provide direction for the California Department of Water Resources’ (DWR’s) environmental stewardship activities related to integrated flood management in the Central Valley, and to provide a framework and support for programmatic permitting of flood management activities. One goal of the Conservation Strategy is to contribute to the recovery and stability of native species populations and overall biotic community diversity. A set of potential target species was identified to support measurable objectives for this goal. For those target species with the greatest need for recovery of their populations, focused conservation planning was conducted. This appendix documents the process used for selecting the target species of the Conservation Strategy, including 17 target species for which focused conservation planning was conducted. The results of this focused planning are also provided in this appendix, in the form of focused conservation plans. This document is scheduled to be updated every 5 years. Because the conservation needs of species change, in the future, additional species may become suitable targets for the Conservation Strategy. Therefore, during preparation of the 5-year updates to the CVFPP, the preliminary list of species in this appendix will be reevaluated using the same criteria described below. Species meeting these criteria will be added, and focused conservation plans will be developed for them and included in subsequent updates of the Conservation Strategy. During the public comment period, new information regarding the status of the delta smelt (Hypomesus transpacificus) and its habitat use in the Systemwide Planning Area (SPA) was made available, and a recovery plan for the species is expected to be released in 2016; therefore, this species will be considered for inclusion in the 2022 CVFPP and Conservation Strategy. Other species that were considered during the initial screening could be reconsidered, and targeted conservation plans may be developed. These species include the western pond turtle (Actinemys marmorata), tricolored blackbird (Agelaius tricolor), western red bat (Lasiurus blossevillii), and western burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia hypugaea). 2.0 Selection of Target Species Potential target species are those sensitive, native species that could most benefit from implementation of the Conservation Strategy to enhance and restore processes and habitats, primarily because of their strong association with river and floodplain ecosystems of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys. A preliminary list of candidate target species was compiled from the lists of sensitive species potentially affected by implementation of the CVFPP (see the CVFPP program environmental impact report [PEIR]; DWR 2012). The preliminary list was also based on additional review of the California Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB; California Department of Fish and Wildlife [CDFW] 2014) and other information sources (California Native Plant Society [CNPS] 2012; CalFish 2012; California Interagency Wildlife July 2016 G-1 Appendix G. Identification of Target Species and CVFPP Conservation Strategy Focused Conservation Plans Task Group 2008; Shuford and Gardali 2008; CALFED Bay-Delta Program 2000). To be selected as a potential target, a species had to satisfy all three of the following criteria: 1. Sensitive or special-status—The species must be identified as sensitive or special status in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations; or by CDFW, National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Species included those listed as threatened or endangered under the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA) or California Endangered Species Act (CESA), candidates for listing, species that are Fully Protected under the California Fish and Game Code, California Species of Special Concern, and species on California Rare Plant Ranks 1A, 1B, and 2. 2. Associated with target habitats—The species must require riverine aquatic (including shaded riverine aquatic [SRA] cover), riparian, marsh, or periodically inundated floodplain habitats as the primary habitat for one or more life stages or ecological needs (e.g., reproduction or foraging). 3. Potential CVFPP effect—Implementation of the CVFPP, including flood projects and operations and maintenance, could temporarily or permanently affect California populations of the species, based on its distribution, habitat associations, and ecology (effects may be adverse or beneficial). The application of these criteria to the preliminary list of candidates for target species (summarized in Tables 2-1 and 2-2) was reviewed by biologists from DWR, as well as by biologists with expertise in the riverine, riparian, and fresh water emergent marsh systems of the Sacramento and San Joaquin Valleys. It also was reviewed by the Interagency Advisory Committee (see Section 1.3 of the Conservation Strategy for a description of this advisory committee’s composition and role). The resulting list of target species, along with their distribution by Conservation Planning Area (CPA; delineated in the Conservation Strategy), is provided in Table 2-3. The habitat requirements of target species then guided development of the Conservation Strategy’s objectives and prioritization of future projects. 3.0 Identification of Target Species for Focused Conservation Planning For the most part, the Conservation Strategy will achieve benefits for target species through restoration of ecosystem processes and habitats and reduction of stressors related to the flood system. However, a subset of target species have additional, more specialized or localized habitat requirements, or their populations are not primarily restricted by habitat availability. Benefits to these species can be maximized by designing management actions to meet, wherever feasible, the species’ specific conservation needs. For example, designing high-water refugia for species sensitive to flood inundation (e.g., riparian brush rabbit) will yield additional benefits at locations identified as critical to a target species. Therefore, to ensure that the Conservation Strategy G-2 July 2016 CVFPP Conservation Strategy Appendix G. Identification of Target Species and Focused Conservation Plans Table 2-1. Screening of Animal Species Potentially Affected by CVFPP (including the Conservation Strategy) for Target Species and Focused Conservation Planning Target Species Regional Associated Major Potential T/E
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Rare Plants Report
    Western Riverside County Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Biological Monitoring Program 2019 Rare Plant Survey Report Brand’s Phacelia (Phacelia stellaris) Little mousetail (Myosurus minimus ) 21 April 2020 i 2019 Rare Plant Survey Report TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 Goals and Objectives .......................................................................................................... 1 Methods .............................................................................................................................. 2 Protocol Development ........................................................................................................ 2 Survey Methods .................................................................................................................. 2 Training ............................................................................................................................... 3 Data Analysis ...................................................................................................................... 4 Results ................................................................................................................................. 5 Targeted Surveys ................................................................................................................ 5 Species with Additional Requirements ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Progress Report for the San Joaquin Valley Giant Garter Snake
    PROGRESS REPORT: 2003 SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY GIANT GARTER SNAKE CONSERVATION PROJECT Prepared by: Todd Williams, Wildlife Biologist Veronica Wunderlich, Biological Science Technician U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service San Luis National Wildlife Refuge Complex Box 2176 Los Banos, CA 93635 INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND: The giant garter snake, Thamnophis gigas (Rossman & Stewart 1987), was designated as a federally threatened species throughout its range in October 1993 and (USFWS 1993). Giant garter snakes are endemic to the Central Valley of California, and historically occurred throughout the San Joaquin and Sacramento Valleys (Hansen and Brode 1980). They are thought to have occurred as far north as Butte County and south to Kern County, within the boundaries of the foothills of the Coastal and Sierra Nevada ranges. The current range of the giant garter snake is confined to the Sacramento Valley and isolated portions of the San Joaquin Valley (USFWS 1999). The giant garter snake is primarily an aquatic species that feeds on small fishes, tadpoles, and frogs (Fitch 1941). Historically, prey items included thick-tailed chub (Gila crassicauda), Sacramento blackfish (Orthodox microlepidus), and the California red- legged frog (Rana aurora draytoni), all of which have been extirpated from the giant garter snake’s current range (Rossman et al 1996). The habitat requirements of giant garter snakes include wetland areas with sufficient emergent vegetation for cover, openings in the vegetation for basking, and access to rodent burrows for shelter and winter periods of reduced activity (USFWS 1993). Giant garter snakes tend to be absent from rivers that support populations of large predatory fish as well as watercourses that have sand, gravel or rocky substrates (Hansen 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • 3.4 Biological Resources for the Purpose of This EIR, Biological Resources Comprise Vegetation, Wildlife, Natural Communities, and Wetlands and Other Waters
    Impact Analysis Alameda County Community Development Agency Biological Resources 3.4 Biological Resources For the purpose of this EIR, biological resources comprise vegetation, wildlife, natural communities, and wetlands and other waters. Potential biological resource impacts associated with the program and the two individual projects are analyzed. Potential impacts are described quantitatively and qualitatively in Section 3.4.2, Environmental Impacts. This section also identifies specific and detailed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for potentially significant impacts on biological resources, where necessary. 3.4.1 Existing Conditions Regulatory Setting Federal Endangered Species Act Pursuant to the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), USFWS and the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) have authority over projects that may result in take of a species listed as threatened or endangered under the act. Take is defined under the ESA, in part, as killing, harming, or harassing. Under federal regulations, take is further defined to include habitat modification or degradation that results, or is reasonably expected to result, in death or injury to wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding, or sheltering. If a likelihood exists that a project would result in take of a federally listed species, either an incidental take permit, under Section 10(a) of the ESA, or a federal interagency consultation, under Section 7 of the ESA, is required. Several federally listed species—vernal pool fairy shrimp (Branchinecta lynchi), longhorn fairy shrimp (Branchinecta longiantenna), vernal pool tadpole shrimp (Lepidurus packardi), California tiger salamander (Ambystoma californiense), California red‐legged frog (Rana draytonii), Alameda whipsnake (Masticophis lateralis euryxanthus), and San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica)—have the potential to be affected by activities associated with the Golden Hills and Patterson Pass projects as well as subsequent repowering projects.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 4.3-1 Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office, Letter Species List
    APPENDIX 4.3-1 CNDDB RESULTS SPECIAL-STATUS SPECIES PLANT AND WILDLIFE DATABASE CNPS INVENTORY Sacramento Fish & Wildlife Office, Customized Species List Letter United States Department of the Interior Departmento Fish & Wildlife Service of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE logo logo Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office 2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2605 Sacramento, California 95825 September 18, 2007 Document Number: 070918092715 Angela Calderaro PMC 2729 Prospect Park Drive, Suite 220 Rancho Cordova, CA 95670 Subject: Species List for Mitchell Ranch Center Dear: Interested party We are sending this official species list in response to your September 18, 2007 request for information about endangered and threatened species. The list covers the California counties and/or U.S. Geological Survey 7½ minute quad or quads you requested. Our database was developed primarily to assist Federal agencies that are consulting with us. Therefore, our lists include all of the sensitive species that have been found in a certain area and also ones that may be affected by projects in the area. For example, a fish may be on the list for a quad if it lives somewhere downstream from that quad. Birds are included even if they only migrate through an area. In other words, we include all of the species we want people to consider when they do something that affects the environment. Please read Important Information About Your Species List (below). It explains how we made the list and describes your responsibilities under the Endangered Species Act. Our database is constantly updated as species are proposed, listed and delisted. If you address proposed and candidate species in your planning, this should not be a problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Monophyly and Biogeography of Cryptantha (Boraginaceae)
    Systematic Botany (2018), 43(1): pp. 53–76 © Copyright 2018 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists DOI 10.1600/036364418X696978 Date of publication April 18, 2018 Evaluating the Monophyly and Biogeography of Cryptantha (Boraginaceae) Makenzie E. Mabry1,2 and Michael G. Simpson1 1Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182, U. S. A. 2Current address: Division of Biological Sciences and Bond Life Sciences Center, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, U. S. A. Authors for correspondence ([email protected]; [email protected]) Abstract—Cryptantha, an herbaceous plant genus of the Boraginaceae, subtribe Amsinckiinae, has an American amphitropical disjunct distri- bution, found in western North America and western South America, but not in the intervening tropics. In a previous study, Cryptantha was found to be polyphyletic and was split into five genera, including a weakly supported, potentially non-monophyletic Cryptantha s. s. In this and subsequent studies of the Amsinckiinae, interrelationships within Cryptantha were generally not strongly supported and sample size was generally low. Here we analyze a greatly increased sampling of Cryptantha taxa using high-throughput, genome skimming data, in which we obtained the complete ribosomal cistron, the nearly complete chloroplast genome, and twenty-three mitochondrial genes. Our analyses have allowed for inference of clades within this complex with strong support. The occurrence of a non-monophyletic Cryptantha is confirmed, with three major clades obtained, termed here the Johnstonella/Albidae clade, the Maritimae clade, and a large Cryptantha core clade, each strongly supported as monophyletic. From these phylogenomic analyses, we assess the classification, character evolution, and phylogeographic history that elucidates the current amphitropical distribution of the group.
    [Show full text]
  • New Year's Weekend Continues with Breaking
    For Immediate Release NEW YEAR’S WEEKEND CONTINUES WITH BREAKING BENJAMIN AT HARD ROCK HOTEL & CASINO ATLANTIC CITY DECEMBER 30 AT 8 PM Atlantic City, NJ (October 29, 2018) – New Year’s weekend at Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Atlantic City just got even bigger with the addition of hard rockers, Breaking Benjamin at Hard Rock Live at Etess Arena on Sunday, December 30 at 8 p.m. Tickets are on-sale this Friday, November 2 at 10 a.m. Multi-platinum band Breaking Benjamin has amassed a sizeable and diehard fan base, both through their chart-topping music, as well as their electrifying live performances. Their latest release, Dark Before Dawn certified GOLD and debuted #1 on Billboard’s Top 200 chart and spun off two #1 rock tracks, “Failure” and “Angels Fall.” “Failure” was also named the most played song at Active Rock for 2015. 2009’s Dear Agony, certified PLATINUM and debuted #4 on the Billboard Top 200 and #1 on the iTunes Rock Album Chart. Dear Agony also spun off the platinum selling and #1 Active Rock single “I Will Not Bow” where it stayed #1 for five weeks straight. Their discography also includes 2002’s Saturate, 2004’s We Are Not Alone, 2006’s Phobia. We Are Not Alone spawned a pair of #1 radio hits, “So Cold” and “Sooner or Later.” Phobia debuted at # 2 on Billboard’s Top 200, hit #1 on the Rock Album Chart and was one of the top 50 selling rock albums of 2006. It featured one #1 and two Top 5 rock radio hits “Breath,” “Diary of Jane” and “Until The End.” Tickets to see Breaking Benjamin, ranging from $39.00 to $59.00, go on sale this Friday, November 2 at 10 AM.
    [Show full text]
  • COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha Minima in Canada
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha minima in Canada THREATENED 2012 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2012. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha minima in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. x + 37 pp. (www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default_e.cfm). Previous report(s): COSEWIC. 2000. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the tiny cryptanthe Cryptantha minima in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. vi + 18 pp. Smith, B. 1998. COSEWIC status report on the tiny cryptanthe Cryptantha minima in Canada, in COSEWIC assessment and status report on the tiny cryptanthe Cryptantha minima in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 1-18 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Sue Michalsky for writing the status report on the Tiny Cryptantha Cryptantha minima in Canada, prepared under contract with Environment Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Bruce Bennett and Erich Haber, Co-chairs of the COSEWIC Vascular Plants Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-953-3215 Fax: 819-994-3684 E-mail: COSEWIC/[email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur la Cryptanthe minuscule (Cryptantha minima) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Tiny Cryptantha — Source: Environment Canada 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterodichogamy.Pdf
    Research Update TRENDS in Ecology & Evolution Vol.16 No.11 November 2001 595 How common is heterodichogamy? Susanne S. Renner The sexual systems of plants usually Heterodichogamy differs from normal (Zingiberales). These figures probably depend on the exact spatial distribution of dichogamy, the temporal separation of underestimate the frequency of the gamete-producing structures. Less well male and female function in flowers, in heterodichogamy. First, the phenomenon known is how the exact timing of male and that it involves two genetic morphs that is discovered only if flower behavior is female function might influence plant occur at a 1:1 ratio. The phenomenon was studied in several individuals and in mating. New papers by Li et al. on a group discovered in walnuts and hazelnuts5,6 natural populations. Differential of tropical gingers describe differential (the latter ending a series of Letters to movements and maturation of petals, maturing of male and female structures, the Editor about hazel flowering that styles, stigmas and stamens become such that half the individuals of a began in Nature in 1870), but has gone invisible in dried herbarium material, population are in the female stage when almost unnoticed7. Indeed, its recent and planted populations deriving from the other half is in the male stage. This discovery in Alpinia was greeted as a vegetatively propagated material no new case of heterodichogamy is unique new mechanism, differing ‘from other longer reflect natural morph ratios. The in involving reciprocal movement of the passive outbreeding devices, such as discovery of heterodichogamy thus styles in the two temporal morphs. dichogamy…and heterostyly in that it depends on field observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Giant Garter Snake: the Role of Rice and Effects of Water Transfers
    Giant Garter Snake: The Role of Rice and Effects of Water Transfers Report of Point Blue Conservation Science May 2017 W. David Shuford Giant Garter Snake: The role of rice and effects of water transfers May 2017 Point Blue Conservation Science W. David Shuford Suggested Citation: Shuford, W. D. 2017. Giant Garter Snake: The role of rice and effects of water transfers. Report of Point Blue Conservation Science, 3820 Cypress Drive #11, Petaluma, CA 94954. Point Blue Contribution No. 2133. Point Blue Conservation Science – Point Blue’s 140 staff and seasonal scientists conserve birds, other wildlife and their ecosystems through scientific research and outreach. At the core of our work is ecosystem science, studying birds and other indicators of nature’s health. Visit Point Blue on the web www.pointblue.org. Main Points Effects on the federally and state threatened giant garter snake are a major concern under a long-term (10-year) plan to transfer water from sellers in the Sacramento Valley to users south of the Delta or in the San Francisco Bay Area. Water will be made available for transfer from cropland idling, crop shifting, groundwater substitution, reservoir release, and conservation. A maximum of 60,693 acres of rice land would be fallowed each year if the full amount of 565,614 acre feet of surface water is transferred annually. This level of idling potentially could have major impacts on this snake given the current importance of the rice landscape in the Sacramento Valley to the species’ continued survival. Giant garter snakes in the Sacramento Valley have a strong association with natural wetlands and aquatic agricultural habitats, particularly rice and associated water conveyances.
    [Show full text]
  • 0506 NVC Student Housing Admin Draft ISMND.Docx
    Napa Valley College Student Housing Project Initial Study / Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration August 12, 2020 Initial Study/Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration Napa Valley College Student Housing Project Prepared for: Napa Valley Community College District 2277 Napa-Vallejo Highway Napa, CA 94558 Prepared by: GHD Inc. 2235 Mercury Way, Suite 150 Santa Rosa, California 95407 August 12, 2020 Napa Valley College Student Housing Project – Initial Study/Proposed MND Table of Contents Project Information ..................................................................................................................... 1-1 Introduction and CEQA Requirements ........................................................................... 1-1 CEQA Lead Agency Contact Information ....................................................................... 1-1 Project Background and Objectives ............................................................................... 1-1 Project Description ......................................................................................................... 1-2 Environmental Protection Actions Incorporated Into the Proposed Project ................... 1-9 Required Agency Approvals ......................................................................................... 1-12 Tribal Consultation ........................................................................................................ 1-12 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ..............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix G. Wildlife and Plant Species at the Sacramento River National Wildlife Refuge and Vicinity (Red Bluff to Colusa)
    Appendix G.
    [Show full text]