DOCSLIB.ORG

Tve334 Beutel.Qxp

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

R. G. BEUTEL Institut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Jena MORPHOLOGY AND EVOLUTION OF THE LARVAL HEAD OF HYDROPHILOIDEA AND HISTEROIDEA (COLEOPTERA: STAPHYLINIFORMIA) R. G. Beutel, 1999. Morphology and evolution of the larval head of Hydrophiloidea and Histeroidea (Coleoptera: Staphyliniformia). – Tijdschrift voor Entomologie 142: 9-30, figs. 1- 29, table 1. [ISSN 0040-7496]. Published 22 September 1999. Internal and external features of the larval head of Spercheus emarginatus, Hydrochus sp., Helophorus sp., and of Hister sp. are described in detail. Character transformations of these struc- tures apparently play an important role in the evolution of Hydrophiloidea and Histeroidea. A basal position of Spercheidae within this lineage of Staphyliniformia is suggested by a considerable number of plesiomorphic features: head subprognathous, adnasalia and nasale absent, gula broad and short, posterior tentorial arms arise close to hind margin of head capsule, tentorial bridge fair- ly broad and straight, maxillary groove deep, with well developed articulating membrane, uniden- tate mandibular retinaculum, cardo undivided, moveability between cardo and stipes fully re- tained, stipes not tube-like, maxillary palp inserted laterally, lacinia strongly developed and hook-like, prepharynx short, anatomical mouth dilatable, brain located within head capsule, glands present in labial region. Some of these character states are also found in larvae of Hydrochus but not in other larvae of Hydrophiloidea and Histeroidea. A cladistic analysis, which is exclu- sively based on larval characters, results in the following branching pattern (strict consensus tree): Scarabaeidae + (Agyrtidae + Leiodidae + Hydraenidae + (Spercheidae + (Hydrochidae + (Histeri- dae + Synteliidae + Sphaeritidae) + (Helophoridae + ((Georissidae + Epimetopidae) + Hydrophil- idae)))))). A monophyletic unit which comprises Histeroidea and subgroups of Hydrophiloidea is in contrast to other phylogenetic hypotheses. It cannot be fully excluded that derived character states which are related with predacious habits have independently evolved in both superfamilies. R. G. Beutel, Institut für Spezielle Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, FSU Jena, D-07743 Jena, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Key words. – Morphology; larval head; Hydrophiloidea; Histeroidea; phylogeny. Hydrophiloidea is a superfamily of the polyphagan 1997b). Hydrophiloid larvae hatch from a silk cocoon series Staphyliniformia (Lawrence & Newton 1995, whereas eggs are deposited uncovered by histeroid fe- Hansen 1997a) and comprises about 2400 described males. The larvae of both groups are carnivorous and de- species (Hansen 1991). Adults are found in aquatic, velop fast. However, histeroid larvae seem to be special- semiaquatic, or terrestrial habitats, and some repre- ized on maggots (Newton 1991), a food preference which sentatives of the subfamily Sphaeridiinae have spe- is also found in some sphaeridiines but not in other groups cialised on life in dung or decaying matters (Hansen of Hydrophiloidea. 1997b). In most cases, larvae are found in the same The systematic concept of the superfamily Hy- environment as the adults. However the feeding drophiloidea, the interrelationships of subgroups, and habits differ considerably. Adults rely on various sorts the affinities with Histeroidea were discussed contro- of plant material, mainly decaying tissue (Hansen versially in older and more recent studies (Böving & 1997b), whereas larvae of most subgroups are carniv- Craighead 1931, Crowson 1955, Lawrence & New- orous (Böving & Henriksen 1938, Bertrand 1972, ton 1982, 1995, Hansen 1991, 1997a, Beutel 1994, Hansen 1997b). Archangelsky 1998). The phylogenetic analyses pre- A sister group relationship between Histeroidea and sented by Hansen (1991, 1997a) are based on many Hydrophiloidea was postulated by Hansen (1997a). external features of adults and some external charac- However, the life styles of both groups are clearly differ- ters of larvae. External features of immature stages ent. All stages of Histeroidea are terrestrial and the adults were also described and analysed by Archangelsky are predominantly or exclusively predacious (Hansen (1997, 1998). Internal features of larvae (and adults) 9 Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 06:03:57PM via free access T E, 142, 1999 are treated in very few studies and not in great detail Histeridae (e.g. Quennedey 1965, Moulins 1959). They were Hister sp. (?) (identified with Klausnitzer 1978, not considered in cladistic analyses so far. Important several genera are missing in the key) structural and functional transformations of the larval Hololepta aequalis (Say, 1825) head have apparently taken place in the evolution of Scarabaeidae Hydrophiloidea (Beutel 1994). Therefore, this con- Liocola sp. tribution is aiming at an improved knowledge of the anatomy and morphology of larvae in order to pro- Specimens of Spercheus emarginatus, Helophorus, and vide a broader basis for phylogenetic analyses. Hololepta were embedded in Historesin, cut at 5 ␮m, The cladistic analysis presented in this study is main- and stained with methylene-blue and acid fuchsine. ly aiming at a more reliable character state polarity as- Available specimens of larvae of Hydrochus were mount- sessment. The results have to be considered as prelimi- ed on microscope slides. Larvae of other taxa were dis- nary for several reasons. Only larval features, mainly of sected. Drawings were made using an ocular grid. the head are included. Different higher ranking taxa are Von Kéler’s muscular nomenclature is used in the only represented by the larvae of one or a few species ex- text and the corresponding number are used in the il- amined (e.g. Hydrophilidae, Histeridae) and many data lustrations (Von Kéler 1963). concerning internal features are missing. This is due to The phylogenetic analysis was carried out using the the general lack of anatomical studies and the restricted cladistic computer programs PAUP version 3.1 (Swof- availability of larvae, especially of material suitable for ford 1991) and MacClade version 3 (Maddison & histological work. Detailed study of internal structures Maddison 1992). of larvae of Hydrochidae, Georissidae, Epimetopidae, Synteliidae, and Sphaeritidae should be considered as MORPHOLOGICAL RESULTS an important future project. Spercheus emarginatus MATERIAL AND TECHNIQUES Head capsule, external features (figs. 1, 7) Species examined Head slightly inclined, subprognathous, moderately Hydraenidae: compressed dorsoventrally, rounded laterally. Sclero- Davidraena sp. tized parts brownish to testaceous. Setae unusually thin, Hydraena sp. distribution irregular (fig. 1). Dorsal side of head capsule Ochthebius sp. covered with minute spines. Five stemmata present. An- Agyrtidae teriormost stemma large, located on a prominent, an- Necrophilus hydrophiloides terolateral elevation. Posterodorsal stemma adjacent Guérin-Menneville, 1835 with an unpigmented, semitransparent area. Labrum Silphidae fused to clypeus, posterior margin defined by indistinct- Silpha obscura Linnaeus, 1758 ly impressed transverse line. Clypeofrontal suture com- Spercheidae pletely absent. Anterior tentorial grooves not apparent. Spercheus emarginatus (Schaller, 1783) Frontal suture very indistinct in 3rd instar larvae, oblit- Hydrochidae erated posteriorly. Conspicuous transverse sulcus pre- Hydrochus elongatus (Schaller, 1783) sent in the posterodorsal area of the head capsule. Coro- H. megaphallus Berge Henegouwen, 1988 nal suture absent. Maxillae inserted in deep maxillary H. ignicollis Motschulsky, 1860 grooves, with well developed articulating membrane (mounted on slides) (fig. 7). Distinct ridge present lateral to the maxillary Helophoridae grooves. Gula broad and sclerotized. Posterior tentorial Helophorus sp. grooves widely separated, fairly long and fissure-shaped, H. aequalis Thomson, 1868 scarcely discernible externally. H. redtenbacheri Kuwert, 1885 (3rd instar) Georissidae Internal skeletal structures (figs. 13, 17, 21) Georissus crenulatus Rossi, 1794 Posterior tentorial arms arise immediately close to Sphaeridiinae hind margin of head capsule, connected with the Sphaeridium sp. postoccipital ridge posterolaterally. Tentorial bridge Hydrophilinae straight and fairly broad (figs. 17, 21). Anterior arms Berosus sp. moderately strong. Dorsal arms normally developed, Hydrochara caraboides (Linnaeus, 1758) attached to dorsal wall of head capsule close to Hydrophilus piceus (Linnaeus, 1758) frontal suture. 10 Downloaded from Brill.com09/28/2021 06:03:57PM via free access BEUTEL: Larval head of Hydrophiloidea and Histeroidea Labrum (figs. 1, 13, 21) almost vertical bundles, O: posterior tentorial arm, Fused with clypeus, rounded anteriorly, without below M 17, I: mesally and ventromesally on pro- nasal or adnasal lobes. Lateral margin with several ximal part of stipes; M 19: M. craniolacinialis, O: ventrally directed, triangular, sclerotized processes posterolaterally from head capsule, I: base of lacinia; (fig. 21). M 20: M. stipitolacinialis: absent; M 22: M. stipi- Musculature: absent topalpalis externus, O: mesally from stipes, lateral to insertion of M. craniolacinialis, I: ventrally on base of Antenna (figs. 1, 13) palpifer; M 23: M. stipitopalpalis internus, O: mesal- 3-segmented, anteriorly directed, fairly slender. In- ly from stipes, close to origin of M 22, I: anterodor- serted on a conspicuous prominence resembling a basal sally on base of palpifer. antennomere. Antennomere
Recommended publications
  • Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E

    Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E

    Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E. Carlton Louisiana State Arthropod Museum Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist) Suborder Adephaga Suborder Polyphaga, cont. •Carabidae Superfamily Scarabaeoidea •Dytiscidae •Lucanidae •Gyrinidae •Passalidae Suborder Polyphaga •Scarabaeidae Superfamily Staphylinoidea Superfamily Buprestoidea •Ptiliidae •Buprestidae •Silphidae Superfamily Byrroidea •Staphylinidae •Heteroceridae Superfamily Hydrophiloidea •Dryopidae •Hydrophilidae •Elmidae •Histeridae Superfamily Elateroidea •Elateridae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Cantharoidea Superfamily Cucujoidea •Lycidae •Nitidulidae •Cantharidae •Silvanidae •Lampyridae •Cucujidae Superfamily Bostrichoidea •Erotylidae •Dermestidae •Coccinellidae Bostrichidae Superfamily Tenebrionoidea •Anobiidae •Tenebrionidae Superfamily Cleroidea •Mordellidae •Cleridae •Meloidae •Anthicidae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Chrysomeloidea •Chrysomelidae •Cerambycidae Superfamily Curculionoidea •Brentidae •Curculionidae Total: 35 families of 131 in the U.S. Suborder Adephaga Family Carabidae “Ground and Tiger Beetles” Terrestrial predators or herbivores (few). 2600 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Dytiscidae “Predacious diving beetles” Adults and larvae aquatic predators. 500 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Gyrindae “Whirligig beetles” Aquatic, on water
  • First Record of a Minute Mud-Loving Beetle of the Family Georissidae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea) in Thailand

    First Record of a Minute Mud-Loving Beetle of the Family Georissidae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea) in Thailand

    NAT. HIST. BULL. SIAM SOC. 61(2): 131–133, 2016 First Record of a Minute Mud-loving Beetle of the Family Georissidae (Insecta: Coleoptera: Hydrophiloidea) in Thailand William D. Shepard1 and Robert W. Sites2* The family Georissidae (minute mud-loving beetles) is represented by a single genus, Georissus, which occurs on all continents except Antarctica. However, country records of species of Georissus are scattered. The genus comprises three subgenera (Georissus [Georissus], Georissus [Neogeorissus], and Georissus [Nipponogeorissus]), 80 species, and 2 subspecies (+$16(1/,729.,1 ),.Éÿ(. 2011). Various authors have considered the family as a subfamily within Hydrophilidae; however, current opinion retains family status (6+257 ),.Éÿ(. 2013). Larval, pupal, and adult Georissus are found on damp, sandy shores of lakes and rivers (SHEPARD, 6RPHDGXOWVFDPRXÁDJHWKHPVHOYHVZLWKDFRYHULQJ of sand grains glued to their dorsum (BAMEUL, 1989). Most descriptions of adults are of the external morphology and only a few included a description or illustration of the aedeagus. Larvae have been described by VAN EMDEN (1956), BERTRAND (1972), SPANGLER (1991) and $5&+$1*(/6.< (1997); pupae have been described by BERTRAND (1972) and SHEPARD (2003). The chromosomal karyotype of Georissus crenulatus (Rossi) has been described and illustrated by SHAARAWI & ANGUS (1992), and the life cycle of Georissus californicus LeConte) has been described by SHEPARD (2003). This family is little known because of their small size (many less than 2 mm) and the adults of some taxa conceal themselves with sand and remain still upon disturbance. Although most species are described from a limited number of adults, if a collector takes the time to closely examine sandy shores, the adults can be found.
  • An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae)

    An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae)

    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 40 Numbers 3 & 4 - Fall/Winter 2007 Numbers 3 & Article 9 4 - Fall/Winter 2007 October 2007 An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae) Michele B. Price University of Wisconsin Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Price, Michele B. and Young, Daniel K. 2007. "An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae)," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 40 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol40/iss2/9 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Price and Young: An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Cole 2007 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 177 AN Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Handsome Fungus Beetles (Coleoptera: Endomychidae) Michele B. Price1 and Daniel K. Young1 ABSTRACT The first comprehensive survey of Wisconsin Endomychidae was initiated in 1998. Throughout Wisconsin sampling sites were selected based on habitat type and sampling history. Wisconsin endomychids were hand collected from fungi and under tree bark; successful trapping methods included cantharidin- baited pitfall traps, flight intercept traps, and Lindgren funnel traps. Examina- tion of literature records, museum and private collections, and field research yielded 10 species, three of which are new state records. Two dubious records, Epipocus unicolor Horn and Stenotarsus hispidus (Herbst), could not be con- firmed.
  • Water Beetles

    Water Beetles

    Ireland Red List No. 1 Water beetles Ireland Red List No. 1: Water beetles G.N. Foster1, B.H. Nelson2 & Á. O Connor3 1 3 Eglinton Terrace, Ayr KA7 1JJ 2 Department of Natural Sciences, National Museums Northern Ireland 3 National Parks & Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage & Local Government Citation: Foster, G. N., Nelson, B. H. & O Connor, Á. (2009) Ireland Red List No. 1 – Water beetles. National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment, Heritage and Local Government, Dublin, Ireland. Cover images from top: Dryops similaris (© Roy Anderson); Gyrinus urinator, Hygrotus decoratus, Berosus signaticollis & Platambus maculatus (all © Jonty Denton) Ireland Red List Series Editors: N. Kingston & F. Marnell © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2009 ISSN 2009‐2016 Red list of Irish Water beetles 2009 ____________________________ CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...................................................................................................................................... 2 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................ 3 NOMENCLATURE AND THE IRISH CHECKLIST................................................................................................ 3 COVERAGE .......................................................................................................................................................
  • An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Mordellidae (Coleoptera)

    An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Mordellidae (Coleoptera)

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida September 2003 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Mordellidae (Coleoptera) Anneke E. Lisberg University of Wisconsin-Madison Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin-Madison Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Lisberg, Anneke E. and Young, Daniel K., "An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Mordellidae (Coleoptera)" (2003). Insecta Mundi. 39. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/39 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 17, No. 3-4, September-December, 2003 195 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Mordellidae (Coleoptera) Anneke E. Lisberg and Daniel K. Young Department of Entomology University of Wisconsin-Madison 445 Russell Labs 1630 Linden Dr. Madison, WI 53706, U.S.A. Abstract: A three-year survey of Wisconsin Mordellidae (Coleoptera) encompassing a compilation of data from literature records and local collections as well as field work including trapping, hand-collecting, and rearing yielded 68 species comprising 14 genera in three tribes. Sixty-three species (92% of Wisconsin fauna) represent new state species records, not previously recorded from the state in the literature. Plant-associations and state- specific temporal and spatial distribution data for larvae and adults are noted as available. Distributional records suggest 16 additional species and one additional genus are likely to occur in Wisconsin.
  • Insecta: Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae), with a Description of Sciaphyes Shestakovi Sp.N

    Insecta: Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae), with a Description of Sciaphyes Shestakovi Sp.N

    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Arthropod Systematics and Phylogeny Jahr/Year: 2011 Band/Volume: 69 Autor(en)/Author(s): Fresneda Javier, Grebennikov Vasily V., Ribera Ignacio Artikel/Article: The phylogenetic and geographic limits of Leptodirini (Insecta: Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae), with a description of Sciaphyes shestakovi sp.n. from the Russian Far East 99-123 Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 99 69 (2) 99 –123 © Museum für Tierkunde Dresden, eISSN 1864-8312, 21.07.2011 The phylogenetic and geographic limits of Leptodirini (Insecta: Coleoptera: Leiodidae: Cholevinae), with a description of Sciaphyes shestakovi sp. n. from the Russian Far East JAVIER FRESNEDA 1, 2, VASILY V. GREBENNIKOV 3 & IGNACIO RIBERA 4, * 1 Ca de Massa, 25526 Llesp, Lleida, Spain 2 Museu de Ciències Naturals (Zoologia), Passeig Picasso s/n, 08003 Barcelona, Spain [[email protected]] 3 Ottawa Plant Laboratory, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, 960 Carling Avenue, Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada [[email protected]] 4 Institut de Biologia Evolutiva (CSIC-UPF), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37 – 49, 08003 Barcelona, Spain [[email protected]] * Corresponding author Received 26.iv.2011, accepted 27.v.2011. Published online at www.arthropod-systematics.de on 21.vii.2011. > Abstract The tribe Leptodirini of the beetle family Leiodidae is one of the most diverse radiations of cave animals, with a distribution centred north of the Mediterranean basin from the Iberian Peninsula to Iran. Six genera outside this core area, most notably Platycholeus Horn, 1880 in the western United States and others in East Asia, have been assumed to be related to Lepto- dirini.
  • ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA 59(1): 253–272 MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Doi: 10.2478/Aemnp-2019-0021

    ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA 59(1): 253–272 MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Doi: 10.2478/Aemnp-2019-0021

    2019 ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA 59(1): 253–272 MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE doi: 10.2478/aemnp-2019-0021 ISSN 1804-6487 (online) – 0374-1036 (print) www.aemnp.eu RESEARCH PAPER Aquatic Coleoptera of North Oman, with description of new species of Hydraenidae and Hydrophilidae Ignacio RIBERA1), Carles HERNANDO2) & Alexandra CIESLAK1) 1) Institute of Evolutionary Biology (CSIC-Universitat Pompeu Fabra), Passeig Maritim de la Barceloneta 37, E-08003 Barcelona, Spain; e-mails: [email protected], [email protected] 2) P.O. box 118, E-08911 Badalona, Catalonia, Spain; e-mail: [email protected] Accepted: Abstract. We report the aquatic Coleoptera (families Dryopidae, Dytiscidae, Georissidae, 10th June 2019 Gyrinidae, Heteroceridae, Hydraenidae, Hydrophilidae and Limnichidae) from North Oman, Published online: mostly based on the captures of fourteen localities sampled by the authors in 2010. Four 24th June 2019 species are described as new, all from the Al Hajar mountains, three in family Hydraenidae, Hydraena (Hydraena) naja sp. nov., Ochthebius (Ochthebius) alhajarensis sp. nov. (O. punc- tatus species group) and O. (O.) bernard sp. nov. (O. metallescens species group); and one in family Hydrophilidae, Agraphydrus elongatus sp. nov. Three of the recorded species are new to the Arabian Peninsula, Hydroglyphus farquharensis (Scott, 1912) (Dytiscidae), Hydraena (Hydraenopsis) quadricollis Wollaston, 1864 (Hydraenidae) and Enochrus (Lumetus) cf. quadrinotatus (Guillebeau, 1896) (Hydrophilidae). Ten species already known from the Arabian Peninsula are newly recorded from Oman: Cybister tripunctatus lateralis (Fabricius, 1798) (Dytiscidae), Hydraena (Hydraena) gattolliati Jäch & Delgado, 2010, Ochthebius (Ochthebius) monseti Jä ch & Delgado 2010, Ochthebius (Ochthebius) wurayah Jäch & Delgado, 2010 (all Hydraenidae), Georissus (Neogeorissus) chameleo Fikáč ek & Trávní č ek, 2009 (Georissidae), Enochrus (Methydrus) cf.
  • Taxonomic Status of Enoshrus Vilis (Sharp) and E. Uniformis (Sharp) (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae)

    Taxonomic Status of Enoshrus Vilis (Sharp) and E. Uniformis (Sharp) (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae)

    Title Taxonomic status of Enoshrus vilis (Sharp) and E. uniformis (Sharp) (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae) Author(s) Minoshima, Yûsuke N. Insecta matsumurana. New series : journal of the Faculty of Agriculture Hokkaido University, series entomology, 75, 1- Citation 18 Issue Date 2019-11 Doc URL http://hdl.handle.net/2115/76254 Type bulletin (article) File Information 01_Minoshima_IM75.pdf Instructions for use Hokkaido University Collection of Scholarly and Academic Papers : HUSCAP INSECTA MATSUMURANA NEW SERIES 75: 1–18 OCTOBER 2019 TAXONOMIC STATUS OF ENOCHRUS VILIS (SHARP) AND E. UNIFORMIS (SHARP) (COLEOPTERA, HYDROPHILIDAE) By YÛSUKE N. MINOSHIMA Abstract MInosHIMA, Y. N. 2019. Taxonomic status of Enochrus vilis (Sharp) and E. uniformis (Sharp) (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae). Ins. matsum. n. s. 75: 1–18, 5 figs. The status of two taxonomically problematic species, Enochrus (Methydrus) uniformis (Sharp, 1884) and E. (M.) vilis (Sharp, 1884), are studied. Enochrus vilis is affirmed as a distinct species and restored from synonymy of E. (M.) affinis (Thunberg, 1794). The lectotype of E. uniformis is designated. Enochrus uniformis and E. vilis are redescribed. Enochrus vilis exhibits geographical variation in body size and the shape of the median lobe of the aedeagus. Two morphologically differentiated populations of E. vilis (northern and southern populations) were detected in Japan. Genetic distance of the COI gene between the specimens collected from Hokkaido (northern population) and Yamaguchi Prefecture (southern population) is 1.67%. Occurrence of E. affinis in Japan is confirmed and diagnostic information of the species is provided. Author’s address. Minoshima, Y.: Natural History Division, Kitakyushu Museum of Natural History and Human History, 2-4-1 Higashida, Yahatahigashi-ku, Kitakyushu-shi, Fukuoka, 805-0071 Japan ([email protected]).
  • An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera)

    An Annotated Checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera)

    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Insecta Mundi Florida March 2002 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) Nadine A. Kriska University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Daniel K. Young University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi Part of the Entomology Commons Kriska, Nadine A. and Young, Daniel K., "An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera)" (2002). Insecta Mundi. 537. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/insectamundi/537 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Systematic Entomology, Gainesville, Florida at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Insecta Mundi by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 16, No. 1-3, March-September, 2002 3 1 An annotated checklist of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) Nadine L. Kriska and Daniel K. Young Department of Entomology 445 Russell Labs University of Wisconsin-Madison Madison, WI 53706 Abstract. A survey of Wisconsin Scarabaeoidea (Coleoptera) conducted from literature searches, collection inventories, and three years of field work (1997-1999), yielded 177 species representing nine families, two of which, Ochodaeidae and Ceratocanthidae, represent new state family records. Fifty-six species (32% of the Wisconsin fauna) represent new state species records, having not previously been recorded from the state. Literature and collection distributional records suggest the potential for at least 33 additional species to occur in Wisconsin. Introduction however, most of Wisconsin's scarabaeoid species diversity, life histories, and distributions were vir- The superfamily Scarabaeoidea is a large, di- tually unknown.
  • RESEARCH ARTICLE Hydrochidae

    RESEARCH ARTICLE Hydrochidae

    TAES 142: 167-213 RESEARCH ARTICLE ISSO 0002-8320 http://taes.entomology-aes.org/ Hydrochidae (Coleoptera) of Mississippi REESE J. WorthinGton1, JOHN L. HELLMAN2, PAUL K. LAGO 1 1Department of Biology, University of Mississippi, University, MS 38677. Corresponding author email: [email protected]. 2Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742. ABSTRACT Mississippi Hydrochidae are poorly known. In this paper, we attempt to untangle some of the taxonomic difficulties caused by recent dubious works of D. Makhan and to validate an undescribed species from previously unpublished research. The 12 species occurring in Mississippi are reviewed and one new species, H. falsus Hellman sp.n., is described. Six new synonymies are established as follows: Hydrochus hanoewanti Makhan, 1994 is a junior synonym of Hydrochus rugosus Mulsant, 1844; Hydrochus monishi Makhan, 1995 is a junior synonym of Hydrochus foveatus Haldeman, 1852; Hydrochus equicarinatus Blatchley, 1928 is a junior synonym of Hydrochus simplex LeConte, 1855; Hydrochus daviniaae Makhan, 1995 is a junior synonym of Hydrochus vagus LeConte, 1851; Hydrochus bakkeri Makhan, 1995 is a junior synonym of Hydrochus obscurus Sharp, 1882; and Hydrochus soesae (Makhan), 2004 is a junior synonym of Hydrochus scabratus Mulsant, 1844. Hydrochus inaequalis LeConte, 1855 is removed from synonymy with Hydrochus foveatus Haldeman, 1852 and resurrected as a proper species. Neotypes are designated for H. rugosus Mulsant, 1844, H. rufipes Melsheimer, 1844, and H. scabratus Mulsant, 1844. A lectotype is designated for H. foveatus Haldeman, 1852. Species descriptions, illustrations of male genitalia, distribution maps and a key to species are presented. Additional notes on Makhan species and holotypes, including unavailable types, are provided.
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution

    The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution

    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
  • Four New Records to the Rove-Beetle Fauna of Portugal (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae)

    Four New Records to the Rove-Beetle Fauna of Portugal (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae)

    Boletín Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa, n1 39 (2006) : 397−399. FOUR NEW RECORDS TO THE ROVE-BEETLE FAUNA OF PORTUGAL (COLEOPTERA, STAPHYLINIDAE) Pedro Martins da Silva1*, Israel de Faria e Silva1, Mário Boieiro1, Carlos A. S. Aguiar1 & Artur R. M. Serrano1,2 1 Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, R. Ernesto de Vasconcelos, Ed. C2-2ºPiso, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa. 2 Departamento de Biologia Animal da Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, R. Ernesto de Vasconcelos, Ed. C2- 2ºPiso, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa. * Corresponding author: [email protected] Abstract: In the present work, four rove beetle records - Ischnosoma longicorne (Mäklin, 1847), Thinobius (Thinobius) sp., Hesperus rufipennis (Gravenhorst, 1802) and Quedius cobosi Coiffait, 1964 - are reported for the first time to Portugal. The ge- nus Thinobius Kiesenwetter is new for Portugal and Hesperus Fauvel is recorded for the first time from the Iberian Peninsula. The distribution of Quedius cobosi Coiffait, an Iberian endemic, is now extended to Western Portugal. All specimens were sam- pled in cork oak woodlands, in two different localities – Alcochete and Grândola - using two distinct sampling techniques. Key word: Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, New records, Iberian Peninsula, Portugal. Resumo: No presente trabalho são apresentados quatro registos novos de coleópteros estafilinídeos para Portugal - Ischno- soma longicorne (Mäklin, 1847), Thinobius (Thinobius) sp., Hesperus rufipennis (Gravenhorst, 1802) e Quedius cobosi Coiffait, 1964. O género Hesperus Fauvel é registado pela primeira vez para a Península Ibérica e o género Thinobius Kiesenwetter é novidade para Portugal. A distribuição conhecida de Quedius cobosi Coiffait, um endemismo ibérico, é também ampliada para o oeste de Portugal.