“Public Benefit”: Post- Legislative Scrutiny of the Charities Act 2006
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Corporate Partnerships Work
Reinventing philanthropy Key IT trends Total return The constant changing nature of Charities and opportunities The benefits of following a total philanthropists & philanthropic giving offered by new technology return investment approach October/November 2013 l www.charitytimes.com Making corporate partnerships work EDITORIAL COMMENT Editor Andrew Holt [email protected] Holding the Lobbying Bill 020 7562 2411 Contributing Writers Beth Breeze, Stephen Bubb, David Emerson, The Lobbying Bill is quite a piece of legislation in the Tracey Gyateng, Joe Irvin, Theresa Lloyd Maurice making. It has had the impact of uniting such diverse sector Mcleod, Alex Murdock, Cathy Pharoah, Ben organisations as the League Against Cruel Sports and the Phillips, Antony Savvas, Hannah Stoddart, Oliver TaxPayers’ Alliance in opposition to the Bill. That is some Wallin achievement. Design & Production The deep discontentment and confusion amongst the Matleena Lilja sector is completely justified. This Bill at its heart threatens [email protected] the independence of charities and their ability to campaign. 020 7562 2400 As a result a diverse coalition of prominent charities, Commercial Manager campaign groups, academics, think-tanks and online networks launched an Cerys Brafield independent Commission, the Commission on Civil Society and Democratic [email protected] Engagement, in response to concerns about the Lobbying Bill. 07766 662 610 In its report, Non-Party Campaigning Ahead of Elections, Lord Harries of Pentregarth, Advertising Manager chair of the Commission, writes: “Part 2 of the Lobbying Bill risks profoundly Steve Good undermining the very fabric of our democracy by significantly limiting the right of [email protected] organisations — from charities and community groups to think-tanks and blog sites 020 7562 2435 — to speak out on some of the most important issues facing this country and the Subscriptions planet. -
Official List of Houston County Qualified Voters State of Alabama Houston County
OFFICIAL LIST OF HOUSTON COUNTY QUALIFIED VOTERS STATE OF ALABAMA HOUSTON COUNTY As directed by the Code of Alabama, I, PATRICK H. DAVENPORT, Judge of Probate, hereby certify that the within constitutes a full and correct list of all qualified electors, as the same appears from the returns of the Board of Registrars, on file in this office, and who will be entitled to vote in any election held in said county. Notice is hereby given to any voter duly registered whose name has been inadvertently, or through mistake, omitted from the list of qualified voters herein published, and who is legally entitled to vote, shall have ten days from the date of thispublication to have his or her name entered upon the list of qualified voters, upon producing proof to the Board of Registrars of said County that his or her name should be added to said list. This list does not include names of persons who registered after Jan 16, 2020. A supplement list will be published on or before Feb 25, 2020. PATRICK H. DAVENPORT Judge of Probate ANDREW BELLE ANNETTE BURKS DELISA THOMAS CUNNINGHAM KYLE JACOB EDWARDS MICHAEL WAYNE GOODWIN SHARRON ANNELLE COMM CENTER BLACK MORRIS K BURNEY HANSEL CURETON JAMES T EDWARDS MICHELLE MAIRE GOOLSBY KIMBERLY SHANEDRA ABBOTT CLARISSE ANN BLACK NATASHA LYNETTE BURNSED ROBERT AUSTIN III CURLIN STACY DENISE EIKER REBECCA GORDON MAE EVELYN ABBOTT EARL LEIGHTON III BLACK SARAH FRANCIS BURROUGHS APRIL ANTRONN CURRY ANTHONY DWAYNE ELLARD GRANADA IRENE GORLAND KIMBERLY DARLINE ADAMS CHANEY ALEDIA BLACKBURN MICHAEL EDWARD BURROUGHS KHAALIS -
Hosted Fundraising Event: How to Secure Your Funds Vol
PM World Journal Hosted Fundraising Event: How to secure your funds Vol. VII, Issue I – January 2018 by Christelle Leonetti www.pmworldjournal.net Student Paper Hosted Fundraising Event: How to secure your funds1 Christelle Leonetti ABSTRACT Nonprofit organizations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) represent more than 10 million organizations throughout the world and most of them use fundraising to collect money for their programs. However, they do not use the same methods or have the same results. Fundraising can fail and let the organization without fund and with a negative cashflow depending of the method used and the event planned. Therefore, this paper is developed to analyze the different methods used to raise funds using Multi-Attribute Decision making and determine which one is the best and most effective to use to create a fundraising contract. Based on the analysis, only using one method ensures a low rate of success therefore organizations must be creative when creating their fundraising strategy and aimed at organizations as well as individuals. Key Words: fundraising, event planning, termination, funds, contract, relative weighting INTRODUCTION The American Association of Fundraising Professionals’ 2016 “the Fundraising Effectiveness Survey” report states that the amount raised between 2014 and 2015 by 9,922 nonprofit organizations in the United States is $8,628,240,699. How do those organizations raise so much money? They use online fundraising (Causes, Crowdrise), grants, financial endowment or they use their network to communicate directly with potential donors by organizing events that combine a just cause with a moment of sharing. Those events can be categorized in 3 different types: self- managed events that the organization manages by itself to raise money, one of the most famous being the “Monaco Red Cross Ball” organized yearly since 1948 by the Red Cross. -
Submission to the Senate Ctte. on Charity Fundraising in the 21St Century
Submission to the Senate Ctte. on Charity Fundraising in the 21st Century Background to the PFRA The Public Fundraising Regulatory Association (PFRA) is the self-regulatory body for face to face fundraising in Australia. Face to face fundraising is one of a number of methods used by charities across Australia to generate funding. It provides significant funding that allows charities to provide vital services for local communities and to help solve some of the greatest global issues. Established in February 2015, the role of the PFRA is to make sure that the right balance is maintained between the duty of charities to ask for donations and the right of the public to experience high standards of behaviour from our members’ fundraisers. The PFRA is a charity-led, membership-based association. Members include those charities that benefit from face to face fundraising and the professional fundraising suppliers that support charities in this work. A complete list of PFRA charity members is available as Annex B. The PFRA is governed by a Board of Directors elected PFRA members. The current members of the PFRA Board include senior fundraisers from Plan International, Australian Red Cross, and Peter MacCallum Cancer Foundation. The PFRA is unique in the fundraising sector in that it is the only organisation that has been established specifically to regulate one type of fundraising and ensure compliance with a Standard. In addition to setting standards for face to face fundraisers, the PFRA rigorously checks that fundraisers comply with its Standard through a quality assurance program, as well as enforcing the Standard through a penalty, sanctions and remediation regime. -
Charities Bill
Research and Information Service Bill Paper 11th August 2021 RaISe Charities Bill NIAR 185-21 This Bill Paper has been prepared to inform consideration of the Charities Bill. It provides background to the Bill’s introduction and content, including comparison with current law in Great Britain and the Republic of Ireland, and highlights potential issues for consideration. Paper 55/21 11th August 2021 Research and Information Service briefings are compiled for the benefit of MLAs and their support staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff, but cannot advise members of the general public. We do, however, welcome written evidence that relates to our papers and this should be sent to the Research and Information Service, Northern Ireland Assembly, Room 139, Parliament Buildings, Belfast BT4 3XX or e-mailed to [email protected] NIAR 185-21 Bill Paper Key Points On 21st June 2021, the Charities Bill was introduced to the Assembly. The Bill would amend the Charities (Northern Ireland) Act 2008 to make Charity Commission staff decisions lawful; establish a Commission ability to delegate to staff in future; and enable regulations creating a charity registration threshold. This paper aims to support the Assembly’s consideration of the Bill. Background The Charities Act (Northern Ireland) 2008 (‘the 2008 Act’) deals broadly with charity regulation. It was intended to update Northern Ireland charity law, at a time when similar updates were ongoing in England & Wales, Scotland and the Republic of Ireland (‘RoI’). The 2008 Act was subsequently amended by the Charities Act (Northern Ireland) 2013 (‘the 2013 Act’), to correct technical issues with the public benefit test. -
Corporate Philanthropy in Asia: Innovations That Unlock the Resources of Business for the Common Good
Corporate Philanthropy in Asia: Innovations that Unlock the Resources of Business for the Common Good Entrepreneurial Social Finance in Asia: Working Paper No. 5 asia centre for ocial Our Entrepreneurial Social Finance working papers explore the role of philanthropy in s supporting entrepreneurial social ventures in Asia. We previously reported on the social entrepreneurship & fnance ecosystem, innovative models of philanthropy including collective giving, and how hilanthropy angel investing for impact can beneft social enterprise. This paper examines the particular p role of corporate business as provider of philanthropic capital – fnancial, human and intellectual. In addition to using traditional grant funding, we found that some corporations invest in early stage ventures that reach the poorest with afordable goods and services, or outsource their business processes to social enterprise vendors. Businesses increasingly see skilled volunteering and giving circles as new approaches to community engagement that Corporate Philanthropy in Asia motivate and retain employees. Innovations that Unlock the Resources of Business By way of 23 case studies drawn from Australia, China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, the Philippines for the Common Good and Singapore, we illustrate in this report the various ways these businesses engage with high-potential social organisations and ofer recommendations on ways the corporation can Entrepreneurial Social Finance in Asia: Working Paper No. 5 creatively deploy its resources for public good in Asia. Rob John Audrey Chia Ken Ito ISBN 978-981-11-2708-3 May 2017 acsep: knowledge for good acsep: knowledge for good ACSEP The Asia Centre for Social Entrepreneurship and Philanthropy (ACSEP) is an academic research centre at the National University of Singapore (NUS) Business School, stafed by an international multi-disciplinary research team. -
Principles for Statutory Regulation and Self-Regulation of Fundraising
PRINCIPLES FOR STATUTORY REGULATION AND SELF-REGULATION OF FUNDRAISING Authors: Eszter Hartay, European Center for Not-for-Profit Law Stichting Francesca Fanucci, European Center for Not-for-Profit Law Stichting Kristen McGeeney, International Center for Not-for-Profit Law Core group of experts: Eva E. Aldrich, CFRE International Oonagh B. Breen, Sutherland School of Law, University College Dublin Pia Tornikoski, Finnish Fundraising Association Usha Menon, Usha Menon Management Consultancy (Asia) Editor: Alexander Carter Published in April 2020 This document was developed as part of the Sustainable Frameworks for Public Fundraising, managed by the European Center for Not-for-Profit Law Stichting (ECNL). The project is made possible by the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law (ICNL) through the Civic Space Initiative, financed by the Government of Sweden. The Government of Sweden does not necessarily share the opinions here within expressed. The author bears the sole responsibility for the content. This publication was produced partially with the financial support of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of ECNL and ICNL and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. Co-funded by the European Union Copyright © 2020 by the European Center for Not-for-Profit Law Stichting and the International Center for Not-for-Profit Law. All rights reserved. Table of Contents ACRONYMS _______________________________________________ 4 I. INTRODUCTION __________________________________________ 5 II. RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN STATUTORY REGULATION AND SELF- REGULATION ______________________________________________ 11 III. PRINCIPLES FOR STATUTORY REGULATION AND SELF-REGULATION OF FUNDRAISING _____________________________________________ 14 III.1. FUNDAMENTAL GUARANTEES ______________________________________ 14 III.2. FUNDRAISING METHODS __________________________________________ 18 III.3. -
Oxfam Accountability Report 2015/16
2015 - 2016 HOME / CONTACT CONTACT We value your feedback on the information contained in this annual Accountability Report. Please contact Ali Henderson ([email protected]) with any comments or suggestions you may have. Oxfam is an international confederation of 17 organizations or ‘affiliates’ networked together in 90 countries. The Oxfam International Secretariat provides co-ordination and support to the confederation. This report has been prepared on behalf of the Oxfam confederation by the Oxfam International Secretariat, the registered office of which is Oxfam House, John Smith Drive. Contact details for individual affiliates can be found at www.oxfam.org OXFAM ACCOUNTABILITY REPORT 2015 - 2016 2 HOME / CONTENTS CONTENTS MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE (INGO CHARTER PROFILE DISCLOSURE REF: 1.1) 6 1 SCOPE OF THIS REPORT (INGO CHARTER PROFILE DISCLOSURE REF: 2.4, 2.6, 2.9, 3.1-3.12) 8 2 ABOUT OXFAM 10 WHO WE ARE & WHAT WE DO (INGO CHARTER PROFILE DISCLOSURE REF: 2.1-2.3) 10 HOW WE WORK - ONE OXFAM (INGO CHARTER PROFILE DISCLOSURE REF: 2.5) 11 WHERE WE WORK (INGO CHARTER PROFILE DISCLOSURE REF: 2.7) 12 OXFAM STRATEGIC PLAN AND GOALS (INGO CHARTER PROFILE DISCLOSURE REF: 2.2) 14 INCOME & EXPENDITURE (INGO CHARTER PROFILE DISCLOSURE REF: 2.8, NGO8) 15 STAFF & VOLUNTEERS (INGO CHARTER PROFILE DISCLOSURE REF: 2.8) 17 3 GOVERNANCE 18 STRUCTURES (INGO CHARTER PROFILE DISCLOSURE REF: 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 4.5) 18 ENSURING EFFECTIVE DECISION-MAKING (INGO CHARTER PROFILE DISCLOSURE REF: 4.1, 4.2, 4.4, 4.6, 4.10) 19 MEMBERSHIP OF EXTERNAL -
Cities and Local Government Devolution Bill [HL]; Psychoactive Substances Bill [HL]; Charities (Protection and Social Investment) Bill [HL]
HOUSE OF LORDS Select Committee on the Constitution 2nd Report of Session 2015‒16 Cities and Local Government Devolution Bill [HL]; Psychoactive Substances Bill [HL]; Charities (Protection and Social Investment) Bill [HL] Ordered to be printed 18 June 2015 and published 22 June 2015 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords HL Paper 9 Select Committee on the Constitution The Constitution Committee is appointed by the House of Lords in each session “to examine the constitutional implications of all public bills coming before the House; and to keep under review the operation of the constitution.” Membership The Members of the Constitution Committee are: Lord Brennan Lord Judge Lord Maclennan of Rogart Lord Cullen of Whitekirk Lord Lang of Monkton (Chairman) Lord Morgan Baroness Dean of Thornton-le-Fylde Lord Lester of Herne Hill Lord Norton of Louth Lord Hunt of Wirral Lord MacGregor of Pulham Market Baroness Taylor of Bolton Declarations of interests The following relevant interest was declared by Lord Hunt of Wirral: Partner in commercial law firm DAC Beachcroft LLP A full list of Members’ interests can be found in the Register of Lords’ Interests: http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/standards-and-interests/register-of-lords-interests Publications All publications of the committee are available at: http://www.parliament.uk/hlconstitution Parliament Live Live coverage of debates and public sessions of the committee’s meetings are available at: http://www.parliamentlive.tv Further information Further information about the House of Lords and its committees, including guidance to witnesses, details of current inquiries and forthcoming meetings is available at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/lords Committee staff The current staff of the committee are Antony Willott (Clerk), Dr Stuart Hallifax (Policy Analyst) and Hadia Garwell and Victoria Rifaat (Committee Assistants). -
Charities Act 2006
Charities Act 2006 CHAPTER 50 Explanatory Notes have been produced to assist in the understanding of this Act and are available separately £26·00 Charities Act 2006 CHAPTER 50 CONTENTS PART 1 MEANING OF "CHARITY" AND "CHARITABLE PURPOSE" 1 Meaning of “charity” 2 Meaning of “charitable purpose” 3 The “public benefit” test 4 Guidance as to operation of public benefit requirement 5 Special provisions about recreational charities, sports clubs etc. PART 2 REGULATION OF CHARITIES CHAPTER 1 THE CHARITY COMMISSION Establishment of Charity Commission 6 The Charity Commission Commission’s objectives, general functions etc. 7 The Commission’s objectives, general functions and duties CHAPTER 2 THE CHARITY TRIBUNAL 8 The Charity Tribunal ii Charities Act 2006 (c. 50) CHAPTER 3 REGISTRATION OF CHARITIES General 9 Registration of charities 10 Interim changes in threshold for registration of small charities Exempt charities: registration and regulation 11 Changes in exempt charities 12 Increased regulation of exempt charities under 1993 Act 13 General duty of principal regulator in relation to exempt charity 14 Commission to consult principal regulator before exercising powers in relation to exempt charity CHAPTER 4 APPLICATION OF PROPERTY CY-PRÈS Cy-près occasions 15 Application cy-près by reference to current circumstances 16 Application cy-près of gifts by donors unknown or disclaiming 17 Application cy-près of gifts made in response to certain solicitations Schemes 18 Cy-près schemes CHAPTER 5 ASSISTANCE AND SUPERVISION OF CHARITIES BY COURT AND COMMISSION Suspension or removal of trustees etc. from membership 19 Power to suspend or remove trustees etc. from membership of charity Directions by Commission 20 Power to give specific directions for protection of charity 21 Power to direct application of charity property Publicity relating to schemes 22 Relaxation of publicity requirements relating to schemes etc. -
Consultation on Extending the Charity Commission's Powers to Tackle Abuse in Charities
CONSULTATION ON EXTENDING THE CHARITY COMMISSION’S POWERS TO TACKLE ABUSE IN CHARITIES 4 December 2013 CONTENTS Part I - About this consultation Topic of this consultation Scope of this consultation Geographical scope Audience Body responsible for the consultation Duration How to respond, or make an enquiry After the consultation Part II - Background Role of the Charity Commission Serious cases requiring the Commission‟s involvement Existing powers of the Charity Commission Criticism of the Charity Commission regarding charity regulation and weaknesses of the Charity Commission‟s existing powers Part III - Proposals Proposed Changes Case studies demonstrating difficulties with the existing powers Part IV – Impact The impact of these proposed changes on charities, trustees, the Charity Commission and the Charity Tribunal 2 Part I - About this consultation Topic of this consultation 1. This consultation is about strengthening the Charity Commission‟s powers to act where there is abuse of a charity and/or non-compliance with charity law, in particular where there is misconduct or mismanagement or risk to charity property, and considering whether the criteria for disqualification from acting as a charity trustee should be extended. The aim is to ensure more effective regulation of charities by tackling malpractice and to support public trust and confidence in charities, the regulator and the regulation of the charity sector. 2. We want to seek views on several changes proposed by the Charity Commission. The proposals would close loopholes in and extend the Charity Commission‟s existing powers to investigate and remedy non-compliance in relation to charities in England and Wales, including the provisions that disqualify someone from acting as a charity trustee. -
Advisers to Ministers 5 APRIL 2000
RESEARCH PAPER 00/42 Advisers to Ministers 5 APRIL 2000 This paper looks at how the use of personal advisers to ministers has developed since 1974, reviews recent developments and examines the recommendations of the Neill Committee on Standards in Public Life. It also looks at the development of task forces as a source of advice to ministers since the 1997 election. The relationship between special advisers and the Government Information and Communication Service is examined, as well as the current structure of the Prime Minister’s Office. The Government Powers (Limitations) Bill, a private member’s ballot bill introduced by Iain Duncan Smith, is due to be debated on second reading on Friday 7 April. The Bill has clauses relating to political advisers and task forces, as well as other topics beyond the scope of this paper. The Parliament and Constitution Centre in the Library can provide briefings on those topics not covered in this paper. Oonagh Gay PARLIAMENT AND CONSTITUTION CENTRE HOUSE OF COMMONS LIBRARY Recent Library Research Papers include: 00/27 The Race Relations Amendment Bill [HL] Bill 60 of 1999-2000 08.03.00 00/28 Unemployment by Constituency, February 2000 15.03.00 00/29 Unemployment by Constituency, Revised rates 15.03.00 00/30 The Countryside and Rights of Way Bill – Wildlife and Conservation Bill 78 of 1999-2000 16.03.00 00/31 The Countryside and Rights of Way Bill – Access and Rights of Way Bill 78 of 1999-2000 16.03.00 00/32 Human Rights in the EU: the Charter of Fundamental Rights 20.03.00 00/33 Russia: The Presidential