Natural Law Theory

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Natural Law Theory Natural Law Theory: Natural law (Latin: ius naturale, lex naturalis) is a philosophy asserting that certain rights are inherent by virtue of human nature, endowed by nature—traditionally by God or a transcendent source—and that these can be understood universally through human reason. As determined by nature, the law of nature is implied to be objective and universal; it exists independently of human understanding, and of the positive law of a given state i.e. law given by the government, political order, legislature or society at large. Historically, natural law refers to the use of reason to analyze human nature to deduce binding rules of moral behavior from nature's or God's creation of reality and mankind. The concept of natural law was documented in ancient Greek philosophy, including Aristotle, and was referred to in Roman philosophy by Cicero. References to natural law are also found in the Old and New Testaments of the Bible, later expounded upon in the Middle Ages by Christian philosophers such as Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas. The School of Salamanca made notable contributions during the Renaissance. Modern natural law theories were greatly developed in the Age of Enlightenment, combining inspiration from Roman law with philosophies like social contract theory. Key proponents were Alberico Gentili, Francisco Suárez, Richard Hooker, Thomas Hobbes, Hugo Grotius, Samuel von Pufendorf, Matthew Hale, John Locke, Francis Hutcheson, Jean Jacques Burlamaqui, Emmerich de Vattel, Cesare Beccaria and Francesco Mario Pagano. It was used to challenge the divine right of kings, and became an alternative justification for the establishment of a social contract, positive law, and government—and thus legal rights—in the form of classical republicanism. Conversely, the concept of natural rights is used by others to challenge the legitimacy of all such establishments. Contemporarily, the concept of natural law is closely related to the concept of natural rights. Indeed, many philosophers, jurists and scholars use natural law synonymously with natural rights (Latin: ius naturale), or natural justice. PLATO: Although Plato did not have an explicit theory of natural law, his concept of nature, according to John Wild, contains some of the elements found in many natural law theories. According to Plato, we live in an orderly universe. The basis of this orderly universe or nature are the forms, most fundamentally the Form of the Good, which Plato describes as "the brightest region of Being". The Form of the Good is the cause of all things, and when it is seen it leads a person to act wisely. In the Symposium, the Good is closely identified with the Beautiful. In the Symposium, Plato describes how the experience of the Beautiful by Socrates enabled him to resist the temptations of wealth and sex. In the Republic, the ideal community is "a city which would be established in accordance with nature". ARISTOTLE: Aristotle is often said to be the father of natural law. Aristotle's association with natural law may be due to the interpretation given to his works by Thomas Aquinas. But whether Aquinas correctly read Aristotle is in dispute. According to some, Aquinas conflates natural law and natural right, the latter of which Aristotle posits in Book V of the Nicomachean Ethics (Book IV of the Eudemian Ethics). According to this interpretation, Aquinas's influence was such as to affect a number of early translations of these passages in an unfortunate manner, though more recent translations render those more literally. Aristotle notes that natural justice is a species of political justice, specifically the scheme of distributive and corrective justice that would be established under the best political community; were this to take the form of law, this could be called a natural law, though Aristotle does not discuss this and suggests in the Politics that the best regime may not rule by law at all. The best evidence of Aristotle's having thought there was a natural law comes from the Rhetoric, where Aristotle notes that, aside from the "particular" laws that each people has set up for itself, there is a "common" law that is according to nature. Contemporary jurisprudence: In jurisprudence the term ‘Natural Law’ means those rules and principles which are supposed to have originated from some supreme source other than any political or worldly authority. It accepts things or conclusions in relation to a subject as they are without any need or enquiry or observation without trying to find out the causes and reason in relation to the subject matter. It symbolizes Physical Law of Nature based on moral ideals which has universal applicability at all places and terms. Natural Law is eternal and unalterable, as having existed from the commencement of the world, uncreated and immutable. Natural Law is not made by man; it is only discovered by him. Natural Law is not enforced by any external agency. Natural Law is not promulgated by legislation; it is an outcome of preaching of philosophers, prophets, saints etc. and thus in a sense, it is a higher form of law. Natural Law has no formal written Code. Also there is neither precise penalty for its violation nor any specific reward for abiding by its rules. Natural Law has an eternal lasting value which is immutable. Natural Law is also termed as Divine Law, Law of Nature, Law of God, etc. Divine Law means the command of God imposed upon men. Natural Law is also the Law of Reason, as being established by that reason by which the world is governed, and also as being addressed to and perceived by the rational of nature of man. It is also the Universal or Common Law as being of universal validity, the same in all places and binding on all peoples, and not one thing at Athens. Lastly in modern times we find it termed as “moral law” as being the expression of the principles of morality. The Natural Law denies the possibility of any rigid separation of the ‘is’ and ‘ought’ aspect of law and believes that such a separation is unnecessarily causing confusing in the field of law. The supporters of Natural Law argue that the notions of ‘justice’, ‘right’ or ‘reason’ have been drawn from the nature of man and the Law of Nature and, therefore, this aspect cannot be completely eliminated from the purview of law. It has generally been considered as an ideal source of law with invariant contents. Positive Law Theory: Positive laws (Latin: ius positum) are human-made laws that oblige or specify an action. It also describes the establishment of specific rights for an individual or group. Etymologically, the name derives from the verb to posit. The concept of positive law is distinct from "natural law", which comprises inherent rights, conferred not by act of legislation but by "God, nature or reason." Positive law is also described as the law that applies at a certain time (present or past) and at a certain place, consisting of statutory law, and case law as far as it is binding. More specifically, positive law may be characterized as "law actually and specifically enacted or adopted by proper authority for the government of an organized jural society. This term is also sometimes used to refer to the legal philosophy legal positivism, as distinct from the schools of natural law and legal realism. Legal positivism is the thesis that the existence and content of law depends on social facts and not on its merits. The English jurist John Austin (1790-1859) formulated it thus: “The existence of law is one thing; its merit and demerit another. Whether it be or be not is one enquiry; whether it be or be not conformable to an assumed standard, is a different enquiry.” Whether a society has a legal system depends on the presence of certain structures of governance, not on the extent to which it satisfies ideals of justice, democracy, or the rule of law. What laws are in force in that system depends on what social standards its officials recognize as authoritative; for example, legislative enactments, judicial decisions, or social customs. The fact that a policy would be just, wise, efficient, or prudent is never sufficient reason for thinking that it is actually the law, and the fact that it is unjust, unwise, inefficient or imprudent is never sufficient reason for doubting it. According to positivism, law is a matter of what has been posited (ordered, decided, practiced, tolerated, etc.). Realism denounces traditional legal rules and concepts and concentrates more on what the courts actually do in reaching the final decision in the case. In strict sense, realists define law as generalized prediction of what the courts will do. Realists believe that certainty of law is a myth and its predictability depends upon the set of facts which are before the court for decision. It presupposes that law is intimately connected with the society and since the society changes faster than law so there can never be certainty about law. They do not support formal, logical and conceptual approach to law. The realist school evaluates any part of law in terms of its effect. Jerome Frank has stated, “Law is what the court has decided in respect of any particular set of facts prior to such a decision, the opinion of lawyers is only a guess as to what the court will decide and this cannot be treated as law unless the Court so decides by its judicial pronouncement.” The judges’ decisions are the outcome of his entire life history.” BASIC FEATURES OF REALIST SCHOOL: Realism denounces traditional legal rules and concepts and concentrates more on what the courts actually do in reaching the final decision in the case.
Recommended publications
  • Read Book Socrates from Antiquity to the Enlightenment 1St Edition
    SOCRATES FROM ANTIQUITY TO THE ENLIGHTENMENT 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Michael Trapp | 9781351899123 | | | | | Socrates from Antiquity to the Enlightenment 1st edition PDF Book Turin: Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese, Kyoto School Objectivism Postcritique Russian cosmism more Instead, the deist relies solely on personal reason to guide his creed, [73] which was eminently agreeable to many thinkers of the time. Meanwhile, the colonial experience most European states had colonial empires in the 18th century began to expose European society to extremely heterogeneous cultures, leading to the breaking down of "barriers between cultural systems, religious divides, gender differences and geographical areas". Plato was born to one of the wealthiest and politically influential families in Athens in B. Sir Isaac Newton's celebrated Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica was published in Latin and remained inaccessible to readers without education in the classics until Enlightenment writers began to translate and analyze the text in the vernacular. His urbanistic ideas, also being the first large-scale example of earthquake engineering , became collectively known as Pombaline style , and were implemented throughout the kingdom during his stay in office. The democrats proclaimed a general amnesty in the city and thereby prevented politically motivated legal prosecutions aimed at redressing the terrible losses incurred during the reign of the Thirty. August Learn how and when to remove this template message. Origin of the Socratic Problem The Socratic problem first became pronounced in the early 19 th century with the influential work of Friedrich Schleiermacher. Constitution and as popularised by Dugald Stewart , would be the basis of classical liberalism. If classes were to join together under the influence of Enlightenment thinking, they might recognize the all-encompassing oppression and abuses of their monarchs and because of their size might be able to carry out successful revolts.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Notable Freemasons List of Notable Freemasons
    List of notable freemasons ---2-222---- • Wyatt Earp , American Lawman. • Hubert Eaton , American chemist, Euclid Lodge, No. 58, Great Falls, Montana . • John David Eaton , President of the Canadian based T. Eaton Company . Assiniboine, No. 114, G.R.M., Winnipeg. • Duke of Edinburgh, see Prince Philip , For Prince Philip • Prince Edward, Duke of Kent , (Prince Edward George Nicholas Paul Patrick), member of the British Royal Family, Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England , member of various lodges including Grand Master's Lodge No 1 and Royal Alpha Lodge No 16 (both English Constitution). • Prince Edward, Duke of York and Albany (25 March 1739 – 17 September 1767), Younger brother of George III of the United Kingdom. Initiated in the Lodge of Friendship (later known as Royal York Lodge of Friendship) Berlin, Germany on July 27, 1765. • Edward VII , King of Great Britain . • Edward VIII , King of Great Britain . • Gustave Eiffel , Designer and architect of the Eiffel Tower. • Duke Ellington , Musician, Social Lodge No. 1, Washington, D.C., Prince Hall Affiliation • William Ellison-Macartney , British politician, Member of Parliament (1885–1903), Grand Master of Western Australia . • Oliver Ellsworth , Chief Justice of the United States (1796–1800) . • John Elway , Hall of Fame Quarterback for Denver Broncos (1983–1998), South Denver- Lodge No. 93, Denver, Colorado . • John Entwistle , Rock and Roll Hall of Fame Member of the Who . • David Erskine, 11th Earl of Buchan , Scottish socialite, Grand Master of Scotland (1782–1784). • Thomas Erskine, 6th Earl of Kellie , Scottish musician, Grand Master of Scotland (1763–1765. • Sam Ervin , US Senator. • Ben Espy , American politician, served in the Ohio Senate.
    [Show full text]
  • El Garantismo Penal De Un Ilustrado Italiano: Mario Pagano Y La Lección De Beccaria
    046-IPPOLITO 3/10/08 12:54 Página 525 EL GARANTISMO PENAL DE UN ILUSTRADO ITALIANO: MARIO PAGANO Y LA LECCIÓN DE BECCARIA Dario Ippolito RESUMEN. La teoría normativa del Derecho penal desarrollada por Francesco Mario Pagano debe situarse dentro de la tradición penal ilustrada que le precede, esto es, en la reflexión de Montesquieu y Beccaria. A partir de la influencia de estos autores, Pagano elabora las líneas generales de un proceso penal moderno cimentado en las garantías fundamentales del inculpa- do. La crítica que Pagano dirige contra el procedimiento inquisitorio, entonces vigente, no se arti- cula sólo en el nivel del déficit de garantías del imputado —sobre el que se centraba la principal crítica de los defensores del modelo acusatorio—, además, el autor desafía a los apologetas de la inquisitio en su propio terreno: el de la interpelación represiva. Más allá de la denuncia que Pagano realiza en contra del método procesal del Reino de Nápoles, su reflexión desemboca en una teoría procesalista de carácter garantista. Los principios sobre los cuales tal teoría se articu- la son: el principio de legalidad del proceso, el principio de la imparcialidad del juez, el principio de la paridad de poderes entre acusación y defensa, el principio de contradicción, y el principio de la oralidad y de la publicidad de todo el procedimiento. De esta forma, Pagano intenta dar forma a un coherente sistema de garantías en el cual encontraban expresión y orden las razones políticas y las principales instancias de la Ilustración penal. Palabras clave: garantías fundamentales del inculpado, proceso inquisitorio, proceso acusatorio, Ilustración penal.
    [Show full text]
  • Programme19may.Pdf
    15th International Congress on the Enlightenment 15ème Congrès international sur les Lumières Edinburgh, 14–19 July 2019 Édimbourg, 14–19 juillet 2019 Provisional Programme Programme provisoire 2nd draft, published 19 May 2019 / 2ème version, publiée le 19 mai 2019 Sunday 14 July / Dimanche 14 juillet 3.00 pm–7.00 pm: Registration in McEwan Hall 15-19h. : Enregistrement à McEwan Hall 4.00 pm–5.30 pm: ISECS EC meeting in The Project Room (Room 1.06), 50 George Square (ISECS EC members only). 16-17h.30 : Comité Exécutif de la SIEDS à The Project Room (Room 1.06), 50 George Square. 6.00 pm–7.00 pm: Welcoming Reception in McEwan Hall 18–19h. : Réception d’accueil à McEwan Hall Download detailed information about events and excursions / Télécharger des informations détaillées sur les événements et les excursions : https://www.bsecs.org.uk/isecs-events/ 1 Monday 15 July / Lundi 15 juillet 8.00 am–6.30 pm: Registration in McEwan Hall 8-18h.30 : Enregistrement à McEwan Hall 9.00 am: Opening ceremony and Plenary 1 in McEwan Hall 9h. : Cérémonie d’ouverture et 1e Conférence Plénière à McEwan Hall Opening World Plenary / Plénière internationale inaugurale Enlightenment Identities: Definitions and Debates Les identités des Lumières: définitions et débats Chair/Président : Penelope J. Corfield (Royal Holloway, University of London and ISECS) Tatiana V. Artemyeva (Herzen State University, Russia) Sébastien Charles (Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Canada) Deidre Coleman (University of Melbourne, Australia) Sutapa Dutta (Gargi College, University of Delhi, India) Toshio Kusamitsu (University of Tokyo, Japan) 10.30 am: Coffee break in McEwan Hall 10h.30 : Pause-café à McEwan Hall 11.00 am, Monday 15 July: Session 1 (90 minutes) 11h.
    [Show full text]
  • 01 Pagano.Pdf
    ISTITUTO ITALIANO PER GLI STUDI FILOSOFICI POLITICA E GIURISDIZIONE NEL PENSIERO DI FRANCESCO MARIO PAGANO CON UNA SCELTA DI SUOI SCRITTI PAOLO DE ANGELIS POLITICA E GIURISDIZIONE NEL PENSIERO DI FRANCESCO MARIO PAGANO CON UNA SCELTA DI SUOI SCRITTI Prefazione di GIOVANNI PUGLIESE CARRATELLI ISTITUTO ITALIANO PER GLI STUDI FILOSOFICI © 2006 Istituto Italiano per gli Studi Filosofici Palazzo Serra di Cassano Napoli - Via Monte di Dio, 14 V a Nelli POLITICA E GIURISDIZIONE NEL PENSIERO DI F.M. PAGANO VII PREFAZIONE Dei ‘giacobini’ fondatori della Repubblica Napoletana del 1799 il nome che viene primo alla mente è quello di Francesco Ma- rio Pagano, studiosissimo di Vico, discepolo di Antonio Genovesi, amico di Gaetano Filangieri. Per la sua autorità di giurista, univer- salmente riconosciuta, i suoi compagni gli affidarono il cómpito di redigere un progetto di costituzione per la nascente Repubblica. Al- tamente elogiato da Vincenzo Cuoco fin dalla prima stesura (1801) del Saggio storico sulla rivoluzione di Napoli («I suoi saggi politici sono la miglior cosa che si possa leggere dopo le opere di Vico»), nei Frammenti di lettere a Vincenzio Russo aggiunti al Saggio ricom- pare come principale destinatario delle critiche che il Cuoco move- va alla visione politica dei giacobini napoletani, la cui rivoluzione egli definì ‘passiva’ perché ispirata, a suo avviso, dall’ideologia ri- voluzionaria francese. Si legge infatti nel prologo al Progetto di co- stituzione che «ha esso adottato la Costituzione della Madre Re- pubblica Francese»; ma, ovviamente, «con alcune modificazioni» per «la diversità del carattere morale, le politiche circostanze, e ben anche la fisica situazione delle nazioni».
    [Show full text]
  • Download PDF Van Tekst
    De Achttiende Eeuw. Jaargang 43 bron De Achttiende Eeuw. Jaargang 43. Z.n. [Uitgeverij Verloren], Hilversum 2011 Zie voor verantwoording: https://www.dbnl.org/tekst/_doc003201101_01/colofon.php Let op: werken die korter dan 140 jaar geleden verschenen zijn, kunnen auteursrechtelijk beschermd zijn. i.s.m. 3 [2011/1] Enlightenment? Ideas, transfers, circles, attitudes, practices Christophe Madelein The papers in this issue of De Achttiende Eeuw were presented at a conference organized in Ghent on 22 and 23 January 2010 by the Werkgroep Achttiende Eeuw and called Enlightenment? Ideas, transfers, circles, attitudes, practices. Its starting point was the persistent political and public interest in the classic question ‘What is Enlightenment?’ It is a question that has riddled scholars from the late Enlightenment itself to the late twentieth century, and, indeed, our own day. Kant famously defined Enlightenment as mankind's emergence from self-imposed Unmündigkeit1, while his contemporary Moses Mendelssohn - in a very similar vein - stressed the search for knowledge as a defining characteristic.2 Closer to our own times Michel Foucault suggested - again, not all that differently from Kant's and Mendelssohn's interpretations - that we may envisage modernity, which he sees as the attempt to answer the famous question, as an attitude rather than as a period of history.3 Modernity, in this sense, is accompanied by a feeling of novelty and, more importantly, Enlightenment entails a permanent critique of our historical era. This critical attitude is expressed in a series of practices that are analysed along three axes: the axis of knowledge, the axis of power, the axis of ethics.
    [Show full text]
  • El Garantismo Penal De Un Ilustrado Italiano: Mario Pagano Y La Lección De Beccaria
    046-IPPOLITO 3/10/08 12:54 Página 525 EL GARANTISMO PENAL DE UN ILUSTRADO ITALIANO: MARIO PAGANO Y LA LECCIÓN DE BECCARIA Dario Ippolito RESUMEN. La teoría normativa del Derecho penal desarrollada por Francesco Mario Pagano debe situarse dentro de la tradición penal ilustrada que le precede, esto es, en la reflexión de Montesquieu y Beccaria. A partir de la influencia de estos autores, Pagano elabora las líneas generales de un proceso penal moderno cimentado en las garantías fundamentales del inculpa- do. La crítica que Pagano dirige contra el procedimiento inquisitorio, entonces vigente, no se arti- cula sólo en el nivel del déficit de garantías del imputado —sobre el que se centraba la principal crítica de los defensores del modelo acusatorio—, además, el autor desafía a los apologetas de la inquisitio en su propio terreno: el de la interpelación represiva. Más allá de la denuncia que Pagano realiza en contra del método procesal del Reino de Nápoles, su reflexión desemboca en una teoría procesalista de carácter garantista. Los principios sobre los cuales tal teoría se articu- la son: el principio de legalidad del proceso, el principio de la imparcialidad del juez, el principio de la paridad de poderes entre acusación y defensa, el principio de contradicción, y el principio de la oralidad y de la publicidad de todo el procedimiento. De esta forma, Pagano intenta dar forma a un coherente sistema de garantías en el cual encontraban expresión y orden las razones políticas y las principales instancias de la Ilustración penal. Palabras clave: garantías fundamentales del inculpado, proceso inquisitorio, proceso acusatorio, Ilustración penal.
    [Show full text]
  • Politische Philosophie Und Ökonomie in Süditalien
    Siebtes Kapitel Politische Philosophie und Ökonomie in Süditalien Einleitung Wolfgang Rother Zu den Vordenkern der süditalienischen Aufklärung zählen Paolo Mattia Doria, Pietro Giannone und Giambattista Vico.Die Hauptthemen ihrer philosophischen Reflexionwaren Staat, Gesellschaft und Geschichte.Ins Visier ihrer Kritik gerieten dabei die durch die weltliche Macht der Kirche gekennzeichneten spätfeudalisti- schen politischen und gesellschaftlichen Verhältnisse.Geschichtsphilosophische Analyse führte zu einer Entmythologisierung politischer Herrschaft und führte zu der Erkenntnis,dass sich Staat und Gesellschaft nicht nur nach eigenen Regeln veränderten, sondern auch durch menschliches Handeln verändert werden konn- ten. So rückte in der zweiten Hälfte des 18. Jahrhunderts der Begriff der Reform ins Zentrum des politisch-sozialen Denkens; er avancierte gar zum Leitbegriff der Philosophie: «una filosofia delle riforme per le riforme» (Galasso 1989 [*15: 41]). Politische und gesellschaftliche Reformen, das erkannten die süditalienischen Aufklärer rasch angesichts der Rückständigkeit der Region, insbesondere der unter den spätfeudalistischen Strukturen leidenden Landwirtschaft,hatten immer auch eine ökonomische Dimension. Diese Erkenntnis führte im süditalienischen Denken um die Mitte des 18. Jahrhunderts zu einer Hinwendung zur Ökonomie (vgl. Proto 2003 [*42: 5-10]). Dieser Paradigmenwechsel fand seinen institutio- nellen Niederschlag in der Einrichtung eines ökonomischen Lehrstuhles an der Universität Neapel – gestiftet im Jahr 1753 durch
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Law and the Chair of Ethics in the University of Naples, 1703–1769
    Modern Intellectual History (2020), 1–27 doi:10.1017/S1479244320000360 ARTICLE Natural Law and the Chair of Ethics in the University of Naples, 1703–1769 Felix Waldmann* Christ’s College, Cambridge *Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract This articles focuses on a significant change to the curriculum in “ethics” (moral philosophy) in the University of Naples, superintended by Celestino Galiani, the rector of the university (1732–53), and Antonio Genovesi, Galiani’s protégé and the university’s professor of ethics (1746–54). The art- icle contends that Galiani’sandGenovesi’s sympathies lay with the form of “modern natural law” pioneered by Hugo Grotius and his followers in Northern Europe. The transformation of curricular ethics in Protestant contexts had stemmed from an anxiety about its relevance in the face of moral skepticism. The article shows how this anxiety affected a Catholic context, and it responds to John Robertson’scontentionthatGiambattistaVico’suseof“sacred history” in his Scienza nuova (1725, revised 1730, 1744) typified a search among Catholics for an alternative to “scholastic natural law,” when the latter was found insufficiently to explain the sources of human sociability. In August 1746, Antonio Genovesi was appointed to a professorship of moral phil- osophy or “ethics” in the University of Naples. The appointment marked a second attempt by Celestino Galiani, the university’s rector or cappellano maggiore,tosecure Genovesi a permanent chair (cattedra), after his failed attempt to install Genovesi in the cattedra of logic and metaphysics in March 1744.1 Until Genovesi’s appointment in May 1754 to a professorship of commerce, he would hold the cattedra di etica only in anticipation of a contest or concorso, in which any aspirant could vie for the post.
    [Show full text]
  • Radical, Sceptical and Liberal Enlightenment
    Journal of the Philosophy of History 14 (2020) 257–283 brill.com/jph Radical, Sceptical and Liberal Enlightenment James Alexander Assistant Professor, Faculty of Economics, Administrative, and Social Sciences, Dept. of Political Science, Bilkent University, Ankara, Turkey [email protected] Abstract We still ask the question ‘What is Enlightenment?’ Every generation seems to offer new and contradictory answers to the question. In the last thirty or so years, the most interesting characterisations of Enlightenment have been by historians. They have told us that there is one Enlightenment, that there are two Enlightenments, that there are many Enlightenments. This has thrown up a second question, ‘How Many Enlightenments?’ In the spirit of collaboration and criticism, I answer both questions by arguing in this article that there are in fact three Enlightenments: Radical, Sceptical and Liberal. These are abstracted from the rival theories of Enlightenment found in the writings of the historians Jonathan Israel, John Robertson and J.G.A. Pocock. Each form of Enlightenment is political; each involves an attitude to history; each takes a view of religion. They are arranged in a sequence of increasing sensitivity to history, as it is this which makes it possible to relate them to each other and indeed propose a composite definition of Enlightenment. The argument should be of interest to anyone concerned with ‘the Enlightenment’ as a historical phenomenon or with ‘Enlightenment’ as a philosophical abstraction. Keywords Radical Enlightenment – Sceptical Enlightenment – Liberal Enlightenment – Jonathan Israel – John Robertson – J.G.A. Pocock 1 Introduction Let me begin with a general claim. There are three ways one can write the history of ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • FEDERICO II” Facoltà Di Giurisprudenza
    UNIVERSITA’ DEGLI STUDI DI NAPOLI “FEDERICO II” Facoltà di Giurisprudenza TESI DI LAUREA IN CRIMINOLOGIA STORIA DEL CARCERE CON RIGUARDO ALLA REALTA’ DEL XVIII SECOLO Relatore: Candidata: Chiar.mo Prof. TERESA BRUNO FRANCESCO SCLAFANI Matricola 031/19897 Anno Accademico 1999 - 2000 1 INTRODUZIONE Oggetto della presente trattazione è una panoramica sull’evoluzione dei sistemi penitenziari, con particolare riguardo alla realtà del XVIII secolo. L’excursus prende le mosse dall’analisi della realtà carceraria dalle origini al periodo immediatamente antecedente l’Illuminismo. Il XVIII secolo ha rappresentato un punto cruciale nella storia del carcere, diventato nel frattempo penitenziario. Su questa svolta epocale, e in particolare sul ruolo svolto da illustri pensatori quali Cesare Beccaria, Gaetano Filangieri, Antonio Genovesi e i fratelli Verri in Italia, Rousseau e Montesquieu oltralpe, ci si è soffermati nella parte successiva: l’esecuzione della pena, e di conseguenza le condizioni di vita penitenziaria vengono riviste sulla scorta delle nuove idee illuministiche, non tralasciando il ruolo inconsapevolmente prodromico svolto da una parte progressista della Chiesa cattolica. Di particolare interesse si è rivelato l’originale modello, esclusivamente teorico, e il cui prototipo si può ritrovare nel correzionale di San Michele, costruito da Jeremy Bentham, e minuziosamente descritto da Foucault, ma in realtà mai applicato in concreto, se si esclude qualche richiamo architettonico, tra l’altro non suffragato da prove documentali, nell’ “Ergatolo” di Santo Stefano di Ventotene. I penitenziari italiani, in realtà, costituiscono un modello paradigmatico, cui attingeranno i sistemi stranieri. Howard, sotto questo aspetto, visitando le carceri di Porta Portese e Via Giulia a Roma, le prenderà come esempio da esportare, e dal quale prenderanno spunto i famosissimi sistemi auburniano e filadelfiano.
    [Show full text]
  • Annales Benjamin Constant, N° 35 N° 36 Et N° 37
    Annales Benjamin Constant, n° 35 n° 36 et n° 37 INDEX DES NOMS RÉELS ET FICTIFS Cet index contient l’ensemble des personnes réelles et fictives (entrées en italique) mentionnées dans le texte et les notes des Annales Benjamin Constant, à l’exclusion de ceux présents dans les titres, sous-titres, schémas, tableaux et arbres généalogiques. Nous avons également écarté l’entrée « Benjamin Constant » elle-même à cause du très grand nombre d’occurrences au sein des contributions. ABAMONTE, Giuseppe : XXXVII, 90 AMARILLA Y HUERTOS, José de : XXXV, 20, ABBT, Thomas : XXXVI, 120 32-33n, 37-38n ACHARD, famille : XXXVI, 245n AMAT, Félix, XXXV, 21 ACHARD, Lucie : XXXVI, 147n, 245 Amélie (Constant) : XXXVI, 274 ACTON, John Francis : XXXVII, 87, 109, 111- AMIEL, Henri-Frédéric : XXXV, 121, 123- 112 124 ; XXXVII, 184 ADAM, Alexander : XXXVII, 45 AMPÈRE, Jean-Jacques : XXXVI, 113n ADAMS, John : XXXV, 87-88n ANCELAIN, avoué : XXXVI, ADDANTE, Luca : XXXVI, 51n ANDERSON, Donovan : XXXVII, 177 Adolphe (Constant) : XXXV, 110, 127 ; ANELLI, Boris : XXXVI, 34, 55n XXXVI, 166, 191, 196 ; XXXVII, 20, 23-34, ANGLÈS, Jules-Jean-Baptiste, comte, Ministre 70-71, 203, 204 d’Etat, préfet de police : XXXV, 165 AGUADO, Olympe : XXXVII, 142 ANGLET, Andreas : XXXVII, 176 AGUESSEAU, Henri François, chancelier d’ : ANGOULÊME, duchesse d’ : voir Marie- XXXVI, 217 Thérèse-Charlotte de France : 200 AGUET, Jean-Pierre : XXXVI, 84n ANNE, reine d’Angleterre : XXXVI, 234 AIGNAN, Etienne : XXXVII, 39 ANTOINE DE BOURBON, roi de Navarre : AJAM, Maurice : XXXVI, 179-180 XXXVI, 240
    [Show full text]