DOCSLIB.ORG

Amendment to a Proposal Submitted As Development Application (DA 94-4-2004) for an Extension to the Calga Sand Quarry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amendment to a Proposal Submitted As Development Application (DA 94-4-2004) for an Extension to the Calga Sand Quarry Pty Limited ABN: 30 083 169 091 Amendment to a Proposal Submitted as Development Application (DA 94-4-2004) for an Extension to the Calga Sand Quarry prepared by: on behalf of: ROCLA PTY LIMITED AMENDMENT TO 2004 PROPOSAL 1 ROCLA PTY LIMITED Calga Sand Quarry Extension Report No. 264/25 Pty Limited ABN: 30 083 169 091 Amendment to a Proposal Submitted as Development Application (DA 94-4-2004) for an Extension to the Calga Sand Quarry Prepared by: On Behalf of: R.W. Corkery & Company Pty. Limited Rocla Pty Limited Geological & Environmental Consultants RMB 1215 Peats Ridge Road 75 Kite Street CALGA NSW 2250 ORANGE NSW 2800 ABN: 31 002 033 712 ABN: 30 083 169 091 Telephone: (02) 6362 5411 Telephone: (02) 4375 1151 Facsimile: (02) 6361 3622 Facsimile: (02) 4375 1171 June 2005 Ref No. 264/25 R. W. CORKERY & CO. PTY. LIMITED ROCLA PTY LIMITED 2 AMENDMENT TO 2004 PROPOSAL Report No. 264/25 Calga Sand Quarry Extension This Copyright is included for the protection of this document COPYRIGHT © R.W. Corkery & Co. Pty. Limited 2005 and © Rocla Pty Limited 2005 All intellectual property and copyright reserved. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, 1968, no part of this report may be reproduced, transmitted, stored in a retrieval system or adapted in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without written permission. Enquiries should be addressed to R.W. Corkery & Co. Pty. Limited. R. W. CORKERY & CO. PTY. LIMITED AMENDMENT TO 2004 PROPOSAL 3 ROCLA PTY LIMITED Calga Sand Quarry Extension Report No. 264/25 CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................5 2 BACKGROUND ..............................................................................................................5 3 2005 AMENDED PROJECT SITE DESCRIPTION ..........................................................6 4 PERMISSIBILITY OF THE 2005 AMENDED PROPOSAL............................................16 4.1 General Permissibility........................................................................................... 16 4.2 Proposed 2005 Amended Quarry Design ............................................................. 20 5 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS.......................................................................................21 5.1 Introduction .......................................................................................................... 21 5.2 Surface Water ...................................................................................................... 21 5.3 Groundwater ........................................................................................................ 22 5.3.1 Groundwater Drawdown and Bore Hole Yield.......................................22 5.3.2 Groundwater In-flow to the Proposed 2005 Amended Quarry Extension .............................................................................................26 5.3.3 Conclusion ...........................................................................................26 5.4 Soils and Land Capability ..................................................................................... 26 5.5 Noise.................................................................................................................... 26 5.5.1 Construction Noise ...............................................................................26 5.5.2 Operational Noise.................................................................................28 5.6 Air Quality............................................................................................................. 28 5.7 Ecology ................................................................................................................ 28 5.7.1 Flora.....................................................................................................28 5.7.2 Fauna...................................................................................................29 5.8 Transportation ...................................................................................................... 29 5.9 Aboriginal Heritage............................................................................................... 29 5.10 Visibility ................................................................................................................ 29 5.11 Land Use.............................................................................................................. 30 5.12 Socio-Economic Climate ...................................................................................... 30 5.12.1 Introduction ..........................................................................................30 5.12.2 Specific Residential Impacts.................................................................30 5.12.3 Local Impacts .......................................................................................34 5.12.4 Conclusion ...........................................................................................36 5.13 Planning Instrument Compliance.......................................................................... 36 6 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND MONITORING ............................................36 7 CONCLUSION...............................................................................................................37 8 REFERENCES ..............................................................................................................37 FIGURES Figure 1 2005 Amended Project Site Layout ...................................................................... 7 Figure 2 2005 Amended Quarry Design............................................................................. 8 Figure 3 2005 Amended Extraction Sequence ................................................................. 11 Figure 4 2005 Amended Final Landform .......................................................................... 13 Figure 5 Planning Context................................................................................................ 17 Figure 6 Planning Context: SREP 8 ................................................................................. 19 Figure 7 Groundwater Drawdown..................................................................................... 23 Figure 8 Land Ownership Surrounding the Project Site.................................................... 31 R. W. CORKERY & CO. PTY. LIMITED ROCLA PTY LIMITED 4 AMENDMENT TO 2004 PROPOSAL Report No. 264/25 Calga Sand Quarry Extension CONTENTS Page TABLES Table 1 In-Situ Friable Sandstone Resources and Proposed Sand Recovery................... 9 Table 2 Calculations of Silt Produced and Available Storage.......................................... 10 Table 3 Silt Production - Storage Availability................................................................... 15 Table 4 Three Dimensional Modelling Impact Assessment ............................................. 22 Table 5 Construction Noise............................................................................................. 27 Table 6 Calculated LAeq Operational Noise Levels Exceeded for 10% of 15 Minute Periods, dB(A).................................................................................................... 28 ANNEXURES Annexure 1 C.M. Jewell & Associates Pty Ltd – Three-dimensional modelling for the proposed Calga Sand Quarry extension for R.W. Corkery & Co. Pty. Limited – Ref J0290.55R Annexure 2 C.M. Jewell & Associates Pty Ltd – Response to request for further information – Ref J0290.57L Annexure 3 C.M. Jewell & Associates Pty Ltd – Technical appraisal of proposed impact mitigation strategies – Ref J0290.58L Annexure 4 C.M. Jewell & Associates Pty Ltd – Response to request for additional information on water ‘make, local impacts and existing water licences – Ref J0290.61L Annexure 5 C.M. Jewell & Associates Pty Ltd – Revised Three-dimensional modelling for the 2005 amended proposal – Ref (J0290.64L) Annexure 6 Wilkinson Murray Pty Ltd – Additional information provided regarding construction noise at surrounding residences – Ref RWC 030205 RB DIPNR Annexure 7 Wilkinson Murray Pty Ltd – Results of revised operational noise modelling following the implementation of additional noise controls – Ref 01127C Annexure 8 Wilkinson Murray Pty Ltd – Results of revised operational noise modelling at the Gazzana Residence – Ref 01127D Annexure 9 Anne Clements & Associates Pty Ltd – Target Flora Surveys and Assessment for the Proposed Calga Sand Quarry Extensions – Ref 26424_Flora_Pt1_Pt2 Annexure 10 Abel Ecology – Red-crowned Toadlet Survey and Assessment for Rocla Materials Pty Ltd for the Proposed Calga Sand Quarry Extension – Ref 1 Rocla report 2 March 2005 Annexure 11 Landscape Management Plan for the proposed Calga Sand Quarry extension, prepared by R.W. Corkery & Co. Pty Limited. R. W. CORKERY & CO. PTY. LIMITED AMENDMENT TO 2004 PROPOSAL 5 ROCLA PTY LIMITED Calga Sand Quarry Extension Report No. 264/25 1 INTRODUCTION Rocla Pty Limited (“Rocla”) submitted a development application (DA 94-4-2004) on 27 May 2004 supported by an Environmental Impact Statement to extend the Calga Sand Quarry on Lot 2, DP 229889 and Lot 121, DP 755221 by 22.3ha (the “2004 proposal”). As a consequence of a number of issues raised during the assessment of the proposed development, Rocla has decided to scale back the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • CALGA Monitoring Report 2
    CALGA Monitoring Report 2 For: Calga Sand Quarry Extension November 2013 Final PO Box 2474 Carlingford Court 2118 Report No. 12081RP The preparation of this report has been in accordance with the brief provided by the Client and has relied upon the data and results collected at or under the times and conditions specified in the report. All findings, conclusions or recommendations contained within the report are based only on the aforementioned circumstances. The report has been prepared for use by the Client and no responsibility for its use by other parties is accepted by Cumberland Ecology. Revision Date Issued Reviewed by Approved by Date Approved Revision Type Approved by: David Robertson Position: Director Signed: Date: 29 November, 2013 CUMBERLAND ECOLOGY © - CALGA FINAL CALGA SAND QUARRY EXTENSION 29 NOVEMBER 2013 Table of Contents 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Summary 1.1 1.1.1 Introduction 1.1 1.1.2 Methods 1.1 1.1.3 Results 1.1 1.1.4 Conclusions and Recommendations 1.2 1.2 Purpose 1.3 1.3 Background 1.3 1.3.1 Performance Criteria 1.3 2 MONITORING 2.1 Literature Review 2.1 2.2 Site Inspection 2.1 2.2.1 Revegetation Monitoring 2.2 2.2.2 Threatened Species Monitoring 2.3 3 RESULTS 3.1 Rehabilitation Monitoring 3.1 3.1.1 Quadrat Surveys 3.1 3.1.2 Rehabilitation Progress 3.7 3.1.3 Noxious Weeds 3.7 3.2 Fauna 3.8 3.2.1 Native Fauna 3.8 3.2.2 Vertebrate Pests 3.10 3.3 Threatened Species Monitoring 3.10 3.3.1 Hibbertia procumbens 3.10 3.3.2 Darwinia glacuophylla 3.11 4 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 Conclusion 4.1 4.1.1 Rehabilitation Areas 4.1 CUMBERLAND ECOLOGY © - CALGA FINAL CALGA SAND QUARRY EXTENSION i 29 NOVEMBER 2013 Table of Contents (Cont'd) 4.1.2 Threatened Species Surveys 4.1 4.2 Recommendations 4.1 Table of Appendices A.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Assessment
    Ecological Assessment Central Coast Sands Quarry, Somersby Prepared by: Prepared for: RPS Hanson Construction Materials PO Box 428 Pty Ltd Hamilton NSW 2303 c/- Insite Planning PO Box 93 T: +61 2 4940 4200 Cessnock NSW 2325 F: +61 2 4961 6794 E: [email protected] W: rpsgroup.com.au Report No: PR103611 Version/Date: December 2010 rpsgroup.com.au Document Status Review Format Issue Version Purpose of Document Orig Review Approval Date Review Date Draft Draft for client review RL/DL/AP DP 15-7-09 AT 16-7-09 M Doherty 17-7-09 Final For Submission RM/DL/AP TL 17-9-09 JH 17-9-09 T Lambert 18-9-09 Final V2 For Re-submission RS/SC MD 28-4-2011 JH 28-4-11 M Doherty 3-5-2011 Disclaimers This document is and shall remain the property of RPS. The document may only be used for the purposes for which it was commissioned and in accordance with the Terms of Engagement for the commission. Unauthorised copying or use of this document in any form whatsoever is prohibited. rpsgroup.com.au Contents INTRODUCTION 1 Site Particulars 1 Description of the Proposal 4 Scope of the Study 4 Qualifications and Licensing 5 Qualifications 5 Licensing 5 COMPONENT A: ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT 6 1 FAUNA AND FLORA ASSESSMENT 7 1.1 Methodology 7 1.2 Site Boundary Changes 7 1.3 Desktop Assessment 7 1.4 Flora / Vegetation Survey 8 1.4.1 Floristic Structure 9 1.4.2 Significant Flora Survey 9 1.5 Fauna Survey 9 1.5.1 Habitat Survey 10 1.5.2 Avifauna Survey 10 1.5.3 Spotlighting Survey / Stag Watching 10 1.5.4 Trapping 10 1.5.5 Herpetofauna Survey 11 1.5.6 Call Playback 11
    [Show full text]
  • Myrtle Rust Reviewed the Impacts of the Invasive Plant Pathogen Austropuccinia Psidii on the Australian Environment R
    Myrtle Rust reviewed The impacts of the invasive plant pathogen Austropuccinia psidii on the Australian environment R. O. Makinson 2018 DRAFT CRCPLANTbiosecurity CRCPLANTbiosecurity © Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, 2018 ‘Myrtle Rust reviewed: the impacts of the invasive pathogen Austropuccinia psidii on the Australian environment’ is licenced by the Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre for use under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Australia licence. For licence conditions see: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This Review provides background for the public consultation document ‘Myrtle Rust in Australia – a draft Action Plan’ available at www.apbsf.org.au Author contact details R.O. Makinson1,2 [email protected] 1Bob Makinson Consulting ABN 67 656 298 911 2The Australian Network for Plant Conservation Inc. Cite this publication as: Makinson RO (2018) Myrtle Rust reviewed: the impacts of the invasive pathogen Austropuccinia psidii on the Australian environment. Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre, Canberra. Front cover: Top: Spotted Gum (Corymbia maculata) infected with Myrtle Rust in glasshouse screening program, Geoff Pegg. Bottom: Melaleuca quinquenervia infected with Myrtle Rust, north-east NSW, Peter Entwistle This project was jointly funded through the Plant Biosecurity Cooperative Research Centre and the Australian Government’s National Environmental Science Program. The Plant Biosecurity CRC is established and supported under the Australian Government Cooperative Research Centres Program. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This review of the environmental impacts of Myrtle Rust in Australia is accompanied by an adjunct document, Myrtle Rust in Australia – a draft Action Plan. The Action Plan was developed in 2018 in consultation with experts, stakeholders and the public. The intent of the draft Action Plan is to provide a guiding framework for a specifically environmental dimension to Australia’s response to Myrtle Rust – that is, the conservation of native biodiversity at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Can Legislation Deliver Conservation?: an Assessment of The
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2002 Can legislation deliver conservation?: an assessment of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (NSW) using two threatened plant species as case studies Claire Louise Brown University of Wollongong Recommended Citation Brown, Claire Louise, Can legislation deliver conservation?: an assessment of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (NSW) using two threatened plant species as case studies, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, 2002. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/1038 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] CAN LEGISLATION DELIVER CONSERVATION? An assessment of the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (NSW) using two threatened plant species as case studies. A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree Doctor of Philosophy from the UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG by CIAIRE LOUISE BROWN, B.Sc. (HONS)-B.A. DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES and FACULTY OF LAW November 2002 DECLARATION I, Claire Louise Brown, declare that this thesis, submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy, in the Department of Biological Sciences and the Faculty of Law, University of Wollongong, is wholly my own work unless otherwise referenced or acknowledged. The document has not
    [Show full text]
  • Hawkesbury-Nepean, New South Wales
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Guide to Users Background What is the summary for and where does it come from? This summary has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. It highlights important elements of the biodiversity of the region in two ways: • Listing species which may be significant for management because they are found only in the region, mainly in the region, or they have a conservation status such as endangered or vulnerable. • Comparing the region to other parts of Australia in terms of the composition and distribution of its species, to suggest components of its biodiversity which may be nationally significant. The summary was produced using the Australian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. The list of families covered in ANHAT is shown in Appendix 1. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are are not not included included in the in the summary. • The data used for this summary come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect.
    [Show full text]
  • The Botanic Gardens List of Rare and Threatened Species
    ^ JTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES JION INTERNATIONALE POUR LA CONSERVATION DE LA NATURE ET DE SES RESSOURCES Conservation Monitoring Centre - Centre de surveillance continue de la conservation de la nature The Herbarium, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, TW9 3AE, U.K. BOTANIC GARDENS CONSERVATION CO-ORDINATING BODY THE BOTANIC GARDENS LIST OF RARE AND THREATENED SPECIES COMPILED BY THE THREATENED PLANTS UNIT OF THE lUCN CONSERVATION MONITORING CENTRE AT THE ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS, KEW FROM INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM MEMBERS OF THE BOTANIC GARDENS CONSERVATION CO-ORDINATING BODY lUCN would like to express its warmest thani<s to all the specialists, technical managers and curators who have contributed information. KEW, August 198^* Tel (011-940 1171 (Threatened Plants Unit), (01)-940 4547 (Protected Areas Data Unit) Telex 296694 lUCN Secretariat: 1196 Gland, Switzerland Tel (22) 647181 Telex 22618 UNION INTERNATIONALE POUR LA CONSERVATION DE LA NATURE ET DE SES RESSOURCES INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR CONSERVATION OF NATURE AND NATURAL RESOURCES Commission du service de sauvegarde - Survival Service Commission Comite des plantes menacees — Threatened Plants Committee c/o Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3AE BOTANIC GARDENS CONSERVATI6N CO-ORDINATING BODY REPORT NO. 2. THE BOTANIC GARDENS LIST OF MADAGASCAN SUCCULENTS 1980 FIRST DRAFT COMPILED BY THE lUCN THREATENED PLANTS COMMITTEE SECRETARIAT AT THE ROYAL BOTANIC GARDENS, KEW FROM INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM MEMBERS OF THE BOTANIC GARDENS CONSERVATION CO-ORDINATING BODY The TPC would like to express its warmest thanks to all the specialists, technical managers and curators who have contributed information. KEW, October, 1980 lUCN SECRETARIAT; Avenue du Mont-Blanc 1196 Gland -Suisse/Switzerland Telex: 22618 iucn Tel: (022) 64 32 54 Telegrams: lUCNATURE GLAND .
    [Show full text]
  • Schedules of the THREATENED SPECIES CONSERVATION
    NSW SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE 1 THREATENED SPECIES CONSERVATION ACT SCHEDULES 1, 2 AND 3 Updated to 26th August, 2011 Summary Species Critically Endangered Vulnerable Endangered Presumed Endangered Species Species Populations Extinct Species+ Amphibians 0 5 12 12 1 Reptiles 1 0 16 24 1 Birds 12 11 22 90 7 Mammals 25 2 16 39 10 Marine 0 0 2 5 0 Mammals Invertebrates 1 1 15 0 1 Plants 34 42 334 231 24 Alga 0 0 1 0 0 Fungi 0 0 5 4 0 Sub-total 73 61 423 405 44 Total number of threatened species (excluding populations) = 959 Critically endangered ecological communities 8 Endangered ecological communities 89 Vulnerable ecological communities 4 Total (Threatened Ecological Communities) 101 Key threatening processes 37 * - An asterisk beside the name of a species or ecological community indicates that the species or ecological community is also listed as threatened under the Commonwealth’s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999. NSW SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE 2 Schedule 1A Critically endangered species and ecological communities * - An asterisk beside the name of a species indicates that the species is also listed as a threatened species under the Commonwealth’s Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act, 1999. Part 1 Critically endangered species Animals Vertebrates Amphibians * Litoria castanea (Steindachner, 1867) Yellow-spotted Tree Frog * Litoria piperata Tyler & Davies, 1985 Peppered Tree Frog * Litoria spenceri Dubois, 1984 Spotted Frog * Pseudophryne corroboree Moore, 1953 Southern Corroboree Frog * Pseudophryne
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016
    Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 As at 1 July 2018 Does not include amendments by: Forestry Legislation Amendment Act 2018 No 40 (not commenced) See also: Government Sector Finance Legislation (Repeal and Amendment) Bill 2018 Long Title An Act relating to the conservation of biodiversity; and to repeal the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995, the Nature Conservation Trust Act 2001 and the animal and plant provisions of the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974. Part 1 – Preliminary 1.1 Name of Act This Act is the Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016. 1.2 Commencement This Act commences on a day or days to be appointed by proclamation. 1.3 Purpose of Act The purpose of this Act is to maintain a healthy, productive and resilient environment for the greatest well-being of the community, now and into the future, consistent with the principles of ecologically sustainable development (described in section 6 (2) of the Protection of the Environment Administration Act 1991), and in particular: (a) to conserve biodiversity at bioregional and State scales, and (b) to maintain the diversity and quality of ecosystems and enhance their capacity to adapt to change and provide for the needs of future generations, and (c) to improve, share and use knowledge, including local and traditional Aboriginal ecological knowledge, about biodiversity conservation, and (d) to support biodiversity conservation in the context of a changing climate, and (e) to support collating and sharing data, and monitoring and reporting on the status of biodiversity and the
    [Show full text]
  • Bush Blitz – Focusing on the Landscape – Biodiversity In
    Focusing on the Landscape Biodiversity in Australia’s National Reserve System Contents Biodiversity in Australia’s National Reserve System — At a glance 1 Australia’s National Reserve System 2 The Importance of Species Information 3 Our State of Knowledge 4 Method 5 Results 6 Future Work — Survey and Reservation 8 Conclusion 10 Summary of Data 11 Appendix Species with adequate data and well represented in the National Reserve System Flora 14 Fauna 44 Species with adequate data and under-represented in the National Reserve System Flora 52 Fauna 67 Species with inadequate data Flora 73 Fauna 114 Biodiversity in Australia’s National Reserve System At a glance • Australia’s National Reserve System (NRS) consists of over 9,000 protected areas, covering 89.5 million hectares (over 11 per cent of Australia’s land mass). • Australia is home to 7.8 per cent of the world’s plant and animal species, with an estimated 566,398 species occurring here.1 Only 147,579 of Australia’s species have been formally described. • This report assesses the state of knowledge of biodiversity in the National Reserve System based on 20,146 terrestrial fauna and flora species, comprising 54 per cent of the known terrestrial biodiversity of Australia. • Of these species, 33 per cent (6,652 species) have inadequate data to assess their reservation status. • Of species with adequate data: • 23 per cent (3,123 species) are well represented in the NRS • 65 per cent (8,692 species) are adequately represented in the NRS • 12 per cent (1,648 species) are under- represented in the NRS 1 Chapman, A.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Plan for Myrtle Rust on the National Parks Estate © Copyright State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage
    Management plan for myrtle rust on the national parks estate © Copyright State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage With the exception of photographs, the State of NSW and Office of Environment and Heritage are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part for educational and non-commercial use, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. The Office of Environment and Heritage (OEH) has compiled this management plan in good faith, exercising all due care and attention. No representation is made about the accuracy, completeness or suitability of the information in this publication for any particular purpose. OEH shall not be liable for any damage which may occur to any person or organisation taking action or not on the basis of this publication. Readers should seek appropriate advice when applying the information to their specific needs. This document may be subject to revision without notice and readers should ensure they are using the latest version. Cover photograph: Myrtle rust on juvenile Rhodamnia rubescens – Angus Carnegie. Published by: Office of Environment and Heritage NSW 59 Goulburn Street, Sydney NSW 2000 PO Box A290, Sydney South NSW 1232 Phone: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Phone: 131 555 (environment information and publications requests) Phone: 1300 361 967 (national parks, climate change and energy efficiency information, and publications requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY:
    [Show full text]