The Art of Maths
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Perspective As a Convention of Spatial Objects Representation
TECHNICAL TRANSACTIONS CZASOPISMO TECHNICZNE ARCHITECTURE ARCHITEKTURA 11-A/2015 ANNA KULIG*, KRYSTYNA ROMANIAK** PERSPECTIVE AS A CONVENTION OF SPATIAL OBJECTS REPRESENTATION PERSPEKTYWA JAKO KONWENCJA PRZEDSTAWIANIA OBIEKTÓW PRZESTRZENNYCH Abstract In this study perspective was presented as one of the conventions for recording 3D objects on a 2D plane. Being the easiest type of projection to understand (for a recipient) perspective, in its historical context, was presented from ancient times until today1. Issues of practice and theory were addressed and examples of precise compliance with the rules and their negation in the 20th century were presented. Contemporary practical applications in architecture were reviewed. Keywords: linear perspective, computer perspective visualization Streszczenie W pracy przedstawiono perspektywę jako jedną z konwencji notowania trójwymiarowych obiektów na dwuwymiarowej płaszczyźnie. Perspektywę, jako najbardziej zrozumiały dla odbiorcy rodzaj rzutowania, zaprezentowano w ujęciu historycznym (od antyku do czasów współczesnych). Odniesiono się do praktyki i teorii, przykładów ścisłego stosowania reguł i ne- gowania ich w XX wieku. Przywołano współczesne zastosowania praktyczne w architekturze. Słowa kluczowe: perspektywa liniowa, komputerowe wizualizacje perspektywiczne * Ph.D. Arch. Anna Kulig, Assoc. Prof. D.Sc. Ph.D. Krystyna Romaniak, Faculty of Architecture, Cracow University of Technology; [email protected], [email protected]. 1 In his work [21] Michał Sufczyński presents the development of the recording methods in architectural design (Chapter XI, p. 78). The analysis based on works [4] and [11] covers from earliest times up to today. 20 1. Introduction Spatial objects are observed in three dimensions – we view them from different sides and directions. „For each look, new shapes of the dimensions sizes and lines are brought. -
Robert Zwijnenberg Introduction Leon Battista Alberti's Treatise De Pictura
WHY DID ALBERTI NOT ILLUSTRATE HIS DE PICTURA? Robert Zwijnenberg Introduction Leon Battista Alberti's treatise De Pictura (1435-36) is best understood as an attempt to elevate painting from its lowly position as a craft, which it still had in Italy at the beginning of the fifteenth century, and endow it with the status of a liberal art. Alberti sought to restore the glory which painting enjoyed in Antiquity. To accomplish this goal, it was necessary to invent a theoretical foundation for it, includ ing a specific technical vocabulary for discussing painting as a lib eral art. The liberal arts differ from the mechanical arts precisely in that they are based on general theoretical principles. For such prin ciples and vocabulary Alberti relied on two disciplines that were available to him in particular: mathematics, which he deployed for discussing the quantifiable aspects of painting, and rhetoric, by which he could elaborate subjects associated with form, content and com position, as well as with the relation between paintings and their viewers. Specifically, Alberti tried to achieve his aim by concentrat ing his discourse in De Pictura on linear perspective and its use of optical and geometrical principles; on an analysis of pictorial com position that is couched in rhetorical terms; and on the connection between painting and poetry with respect to the proper selection and representation of subjects as well as regarding advice on the proper education and attitude of the painter. On account of his decidedly theoretical focus, he succeeded not only in giving painting the sta tus of a liberal art, but also in making painting an appropriate sub ject for civilized, humanist thought and discussion.* The author himself repeatedly emphasized the novel character of his project. -
Alberti on Perspective: Calling His Bluff
Online Journal of Art and Design volume 3, issue 2, 2015 Alberti on Perspective: Calling His Bluff Donald Richardson [email protected] ABSTRACT There are lacunae in the paragraphs of De Pictura in which Leon Battista Alberti describes his method of perspective construction. Although this has been a matter of considerable discussion among Alberti scholars in recent decades, none has deconstructed the text enough to state unequivocally that the theory is both defective and circular – which it is: • Alberti does not provide sufficient information to enable the construction to be drawn with any degree of mathematical precision, in spite of his basing its validity on mathematical proof; • when the construction is drawn (which can only be achieved after making certain assumptions), it does not produce an array of continuous and contiguous foreshortened squares, as Alberti maintains it does; • the ‘distance point’ of the viewer is irrelevant; and • the construction is less practically useful and less technically advanced than the method or methods used by Alberti’s great artist contemporaries - Ghiberti, Masaccio, Mantegna, Donatello and Piero della Francesca - rather than the reverse. This paper maintains that Alberti does not deserve his reputation as the originator of perspective theory and that the Western academic community stands condemned for allowing this situation to occur and to continue. Keywords: Alberti, perspective, quattrocento, painting, writers, academics It is generally agreed that Leon Battista Alberti wrote the Latin version of his treatise on painting, De Pictura, in 1435, not long after his arrival in Florence for his second and most extended period of residence there (1434-46). -
The Pythagorean Theorem Crown Jewel of Mathematics
The Pythagorean Theorem Crown Jewel of Mathematics 5 3 4 John C. Sparks The Pythagorean Theorem Crown Jewel of Mathematics By John C. Sparks The Pythagorean Theorem Crown Jewel of Mathematics Copyright © 2008 John C. Sparks All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form—except for the inclusion of brief quotations in a review—without permission in writing from the author or publisher. Front cover, Pythagorean Dreams, a composite mosaic of historical Pythagorean proofs. Back cover photo by Curtis Sparks ISBN: XXXXXXXXX First Published by Author House XXXXX Library of Congress Control Number XXXXXXXX Published by AuthorHouse 1663 Liberty Drive, Suite 200 Bloomington, Indiana 47403 (800)839-8640 www.authorhouse.com Produced by Sparrow-Hawke †reasures Xenia, Ohio 45385 Printed in the United States of America 2 Dedication I would like to dedicate The Pythagorean Theorem to: Carolyn Sparks, my wife, best friend, and life partner for 40 years; our two grown sons, Robert and Curtis; My father, Roscoe C. Sparks (1910-1994). From Earth with Love Do you remember, as do I, When Neil walked, as so did we, On a calm and sun-lit sea One July, Tranquillity, Filled with dreams and futures? For in that month of long ago, Lofty visions raptured all Moonstruck with that starry call From life beyond this earthen ball... Not wedded to its surface. But marriage is of dust to dust Where seasoned limbs reclaim the ground Though passing thoughts still fly around Supernal realms never found On the planet of our birth. And I, a man, love you true, Love as God had made it so, Not angel rust when then aglow, But coupled here, now rib to soul, Dear Carolyn of mine. -
Il Movimento Illusorio, L'illusione Del Movimento
Il movimento illusorio, l’illusione del movimento : sull’impossibilità della resa pittorica del moto negli scritti di Leon Battista Alberti e Leonardo da Vinci Elena Paroli To cite this version: Elena Paroli. Il movimento illusorio, l’illusione del movimento : sull’impossibilità della resa pittorica del moto negli scritti di Leon Battista Alberti e Leonardo da Vinci. Italies, Centre aixois d’études romanes, 2021, 2020 (24), pp.17-29. halshs-03151603 HAL Id: halshs-03151603 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-03151603 Submitted on 7 Mar 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - NoDerivatives| 4.0 International License Il movimento illusorio, l’illusione del movimento Sull’impossibilità della resa pittorica del moto negli scritti di Leon Battista Alberti e Leonardo da Vinci Elena Paroli ENS Lyon, France Résumé : L’article porte sur la dimension illusoire de la représentation picturale du mouvement au sein de la théorie artistique de la Renaissance, notamment par le biais de l’analyse du De pictura de Leon Battista Alberti et du Traité de la peinture de Léonard de Vinci. Si, d’une part, les théories d’Alberti se trouvent scindées entre la nécessité de la mise en mouvement de la istoria picturale et la recherche d’une harmonie esthétique figée, d’autre part, le système imitatif conçu par le dernier Léonard constitue une véritable renonciation à la représentation naturaliste du mouvement. -
Center 34 National Gallery of Art Center for Advanced Study in the Visual Arts Center34
CENTER 34 CENTER34 NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART CENTER FOR ADVANCED STUDY IN THE VISUAL ARTS NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART CENTER FOR IN STUDY THE ADVANCED VISUAL ARTS CENTER34 CENTER34 NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART CENTER FOR ADVANCED STUDY IN THE VISUAL ARTS Record of Activities and Research Reports June 2013 – May 2014 Washington, 2014 National Gallery of Art CENTER FOR ADVANCED STUDY IN THE VISUAL ARTS Washington, DC Mailing address: 2000B South Club Drive, Landover, Maryland 20785 Telephone: (202) 842-6480 Fax: (202) 842-6733 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.nga.gov/casva Copyright © 2014 Board of Trustees, National Gallery of Art, Washington. All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law, and except by reviewers from the public press), without written permission from the publishers. Produced by the Center for Advanced Study in the Visual Arts and the Publishing Office, National Gallery of Art, Washington ISSN 1557-198x (print) ISSN 1557-1998 (online) Editor in Chief, Judy Metro Deputy Publisher and Production Manager, Chris Vogel Series Editor, Peter M. Lukehart Center Report Coordinator, Hayley Plack Managing Editor, Cynthia Ware Design Manager, Wendy Schleicher Assistant Production Manager, John Long Assistant Editor, Lisa Wainwright Designed by Patricia Inglis, typeset in Monotype Sabon and Helvetica Neue by BW&A Books, Inc., and printed on McCoy Silk by C&R Printing, Chantilly, Virginia Frontispiece: Members of Center, December 17, 2013 -
Recreational Mathematics
Recreational Mathematics Paul Yiu Department of Mathematics Florida Atlantic University Summer 2003 Chapters 1–44 Version 031209 ii Contents 1 Lattice polygons 101 1.1 Pick’s Theorem: area of lattice polygon . ....102 1.2 Counting primitive triangles . ...........103 1.3 The Farey sequence . ..................104 2 Lattice points 109 2.1 Counting interior points of a lattice triangle . ....110 2.2 Lattice points on a circle . ...........111 3 Equilateral triangle in a rectangle 117 3.1 Equilateral triangle inscribed in a rectangle . ....118 3.2 Construction of equilateral triangle inscribed in a rect- angle . .........................119 4 Basic geometric constructions 123 4.1 Geometric mean . ..................124 4.2 Harmonic mean . ..................125 4.3 Equal subdivisions of a segment . ...........126 4.4 The Ford circles . ..................127 5 Greatest common divisor 201 5.1 gcd(a, b) as an integer combination of a and b .....202 5.2 Nonnegative integer combinations of a and b ......203 5.3 Cassini formula for Fibonacci numbers . ....204 5.4 gcd of generalized Fibonacci and Lucas numbers ....205 6 Pythagorean triples 209 6.1 Primitive Pythagorean triples . ...........210 6.2 Primitive Pythagorean triangles with square perimeters 211 iv CONTENTS 6.3 Lewis Carroll’s conjecture on triples of equiareal Pythagorean triangles . ........................212 6.4 Points at integer distances from the sides of a primitive Pythagorean triangle . .................213 6.5 Dissecting a rectangle into Pythagorean triangles . 214 7 The tangrams 225 7.1 The Chinese tangram . .................226 7.2 A British tangram . .................227 7.3 Another British tangram .................228 8 The classical triangle centers 231 8.1 The centroid . -
The Egyptian Tangram
The Egyptian Tangram © Carlos Luna-Mota mmaca July 21, 2021 The Egyptian Tangram The Egyptian Tangram A square dissection firstly proposed as a tangram in: Luna-Mota, C. (2019) “El tangram egipci: diari de disseny” Nou Biaix, 44 Design process The Egyptian Tangram inspiration comes from the study of two other 5-piece tangrams... The “Five Triangles” & “Greek-Cross” tangrams Design process ...and their underlying grids The “Five Triangles” & “Greek-Cross” underlying grids Design process This simple cut let us build five interesting figures... Design process ...so it looked like a good starting point for our heuristic incremental design process: Take a square and keep adding “the most interesting straight cut” until you have a dissection with five or more pieces. Design process Straight cuts simplify creating an Egyptian Tangram from a square: 1. Connect the lower midpoint with the upper corners 2. Connect the left midpoint with the top right corner Promising features Just five pieces • T4 All pieces are different • T1 All pieces are asymmetric • T6 Areas are integer and not too different • All sides are multiples of 1 or √5 Q4 T5 • All angles are linear combinations of • 1 90◦ and α = arctan 26, 565◦ 2 ≈ Name Area Sides Angles T1 1 1, 2, √5 90, α, 90 α − T4 4 2, 4, 2√5 90, α, 90 α − T5 5 √5, 2√5, 5 90, α, 90 α − T6 6 3, 4, 5 90, 90 2α, 2α − Q4 4 1, 3, √5, √5 90, 90 α, 90, 90+α − Promising features Although all pieces are asymmetric and different, they often combine to make symmetric shapes Promising features This means that it is rare for an Egyptian Tangram figure to have a unique solution There are three different solutions for the square and, in all three cases, two corners of the square are built as a sum of acute angles! Promising features The asymmetry of the pieces also implies that each solution belongs to one of these equivalence classes: You cannot transform one of these figures into another without flipping a piece Historical precedents It turns out that this figure is not new.. -
Tratado De Pintura / Leon Battista Alberti
'~'I .lratado de pintura Leon Battista.Alberti UNNERSlDAD IA fJJTONOMA METROPOUTMIA c.sa a<>e<ta al <>empo Azcapo tzalco o 1 e e e i 6 n e n ~ a y 08 J L el)n BaHísb A lberti (1-t02- 1.J.72), de CJu ien Crist ll toro Landino se pres:!untaba en qué cate~()ría el e ! c(l1)(1 cimiento se p o dría ubi car, nació en Génova, ltalii'l , dur ante e l exili o CJuc sufri() S tl famili a. Fue hijo natural de L o renzo Alberti , quien a ]~uJ1 o " aÚ0 5 después, ya viviendo e n PadlJa, l e> iusc ribi ó en e l ~irnna sio de Gasparino Barzizza, d o nlle tuv o d e CO lllpaiieros a Pano rrnita, Fran c.'csco Barba r a, FranceS CC l FilclLl :v V ittorÍlJC1 da F e lhe, llasta l.J.21 cuando ingre:"ó en la uni"ersidad de B o lo Tl ia donde pennaneció siete aúos. La nluert~· d e :3Ll padre y de su tío p atern o los priva ron a él y a S\l b erma n o Cario el e :;:us prot ectclr e;; y' el e :3 U h eren c ia, y duranh:: este perio d o, haumac!o, e m poh recido , y }recuen ternente enfe rmn J e t en~i ó n n er viosa y po r exceso d e tr abajo se refU i2ió e n ::u:" e::tudio s lc¡gales e i niL' i ,") sus e:;:bd ius literarios. -
Gridpattern: 'Grid' Pattern Grobs
Package ‘gridpattern’ July 17, 2021 Type Package Title 'grid' Pattern Grobs Version 0.2.1 Description Provides 'grid' grobs that fill in a user-defined area with various patterns. Includes en- hanced versions of the geometric and image-based patterns originally contained in the 'ggpat- tern' package as well as original 'pch', 'polygon_tiling', 'regu- lar_polygon', 'rose', 'text', 'wave', and 'weave' patterns plus support for custom user-defined pat- terns. URL https://trevorldavis.com/R/gridpattern/, https://github.com/trevorld/gridpattern BugReports https://github.com/trevorld/gridpattern/issues License MIT + file LICENSE Encoding UTF-8 RoxygenNote 7.1.1 Depends R (>= 3.4.0) Imports glue, grDevices, grid, magick, memoise, png, rlang, sf, utils Suggests ambient, knitr, ragg, rmarkdown, testthat, vdiffr VignetteBuilder knitr, rmarkdown NeedsCompilation no Author Mike FC [aut] (Patterns extracted from ggpattern), Trevor L Davis [aut, cre], Thomas Lin Pedersen [ctb] (new_data_frame() copied from ggplot2) Maintainer Trevor L Davis <[email protected]> Repository CRAN Date/Publication 2021-07-17 04:30:06 UTC 1 2 clippingPathGrob R topics documented: clippingPathGrob . .2 grid.pattern . .3 grid.pattern_ambient . .7 grid.pattern_circle . .9 grid.pattern_crosshatch . 11 grid.pattern_gradient . 13 grid.pattern_image . 15 grid.pattern_magick . 17 grid.pattern_pch . 19 grid.pattern_placeholder . 21 grid.pattern_plasma . 23 grid.pattern_polygon_tiling . 25 grid.pattern_regular_polygon . 27 grid.pattern_rose . 30 grid.pattern_stripe . 33 grid.pattern_text -
Brunelleschi's Perspective Panels. Rupture And
© 2010 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands (ISBN: 978-90-04-18334-6) BRUNELLESCHI’S PERSPECTIVE PANELS. RUPTURE AND CONTINUITY IN THE HISTORY OF THE IMAGE Johannes Grave Eighty years ago, in 1927, Erwin Panofsky published his seminal article ‘Die Perspektive als symbolische Form’.1 To create a new basis for the evaluation of perspective, Panofsky not merely focused on the linear perspective of the Renaissance, but distinguished fundamentally dif- ferent concepts of perspective representation and placed them in a historical order from ancient to early-modern times. By interpreting the various modes of perspective according to Ernst Cassirer’s concept of ‘symbolic forms’, he went beyond the description of a mere tech- nical development and implicitly related perspective to more funda- mental cultural and epistemological problems. In this way, Panofsky put the question of the deeper historical relevance of perspective on the agenda. Although many scholars have since criticised or corrected certain details in Panofsky’s account, the historicity of perspective and its various modes has never been questioned. Whether linear perspec- tive is regarded only as an extraordinarily successful convention2 or as a technique of representation that is especially comparable to human visual perception, there seems to be no doubt that the per- spective construction established in the Renaissance should be char- acterised as a particular historical phenomenon. Consequently, Filippo Brunelleschi’s panels, which are believed to be the first demonstrations of the representation of linear perspective,3 and Leon Battista Alberti’s 1 Erwin Panofsky, ‘Die Perspektive als symbolische Form’, Vorträge der Bibliothek Warburg 1924/25 (Leipzig, 1927), 258–330; Panofsky, Perspective as Symbolic Form, trans. -
Easychair Preprint a Game of Life on a Pythagorean Tessellation
EasyChair Preprint № 5345 A Game of Life on a Pythagorean Tessellation Soorya Annadurai EasyChair preprints are intended for rapid dissemination of research results and are integrated with the rest of EasyChair. April 18, 2021 A Game of Life on a Pythagorean Tessellation Soorya Annadurai Microsoft R&D Pvt. Ltd. Bangalore, India [email protected] Abstract—Conway’s Game of Life is a zero-player game played 3) Births. Each empty cell adjacent to exactly three neigh- on an infinite square grid, where each cell can be either ”dead” bors is a birth cell. It will become alive in the next or ”alive”. The interesting aspect of this game arises when we generation. observe how each cell interacts with its neighbors over time. There has been much public interest in this game, and several In a cellular automaton of this type, a single cell may do variants have become popular. Research has shown that similar one of four things within a single time step[6]: If it was dead Games of Life can exist on hexagonal, triangular, and other tiled but becomes alive, we say that it is born. If it was alive and grids. Games of Life have also been devised in 3 dimensions. remains alive, we say that it survives. If it was alive and In this work, another Game of Life is proposed that utilizes a Pythagorean tessellation, with a unique set of rules. Several becomes dead, we say that it dies. And if it was dead and interesting life forms in this universe are also illustrated.