LTE-Advanced Pro RF Front-End Implementations to Meet Emerging Carrier Aggregation and DL MIMO Requirements

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LTE-Advanced Pro RF Front-End Implementations to Meet Emerging Carrier Aggregation and DL MIMO Requirements INTEGRATED CIRCUITS FOR COMMUNICATIONS LTE-Advanced Pro RF Front-End Implementations to Meet Emerging Carrier Aggregation and DL MIMO Requirements David R. Pehlke and Kevin Walsh The authors describe best ABSTRACT ated to reach 74 percent growth in 2015 alone. practices for meeting the Smart devices (defined as mobile devices that challenging coexistence, RF front-end (RFFE) architectures and imple- have a minimum of third generation [3G] connec- harmonic management, mentations are developing new ways to optimize tivity and advanced multimedia/computing capa- LTE-Advanced PRO (Rel 13) multi-component bility) accounted for 90 percent of that growth linearity, and efficiency carrier aggregation, advanced features to increase figure. Mobile video traffic accounted for 55 per- performance related to spectral efficiency such as higher order modula- cent of total mobile data traffic, and specifically the functional partitioning, tion and higher order MIMO, and the concurrent for handsets, smartphones (including large screen optimized integration, operation of all of these features together. In this phablets) were responsible for 97 percent of total and technology selection article, we describe best practices for meeting the global handset traffic. There is no end in sight to challenging coexistence, harmonic management, this overwhelming trend toward big mobile data of the RFFE. linearity, and efficiency performance related to enabled by smartphones, and as we look ahead the functional partitioning, optimized integration, to 2020, predictions indicate a 53 percent com- and technology selection of the RFFE. Recent pound annual growth rate (CAGR) in mobile data trends to improve radio performance are driving traffic, attaining a total 30 exabytes/mo globally. specific blocks (e.g., the low noise amplifier) into the RFFE, with associated architecture changes in LTE-ADVANCED PRO: SOLUTIONS FOR THE both primary and diversity paths. Carrier aggrega- CHALLENGE OF BIG MOBILE DATA tion features are supported in a number of differ- ent methods with different insertion loss, isolation, In order to address this explosive demand for data and noise figure trade-offs, and here we examine rates and total mobile data consumption, manu- benefits of a new category of highly integrated facturers are called to increase data throughput of diversity receive modules to enhance receiver consumer UE. A number of enabling features are sensitivity across all use cases. Movement toward being standardized and rolled out in commercial higher order MIMO in the DL is compounding handset products. The highest priority to date has additional RF Rx path support and requirements, been deployment of carrier aggregation (CA), and cost-effective solutions for optimum perfor- which was introduced in the Third Generation mance trade-offs require a holistic and complete Partnership Project’s (3GPP’s) Release 10, and RF system view of both Tx and Rx in order to involves the addition of more and more carrier address these emerging requirements. bandwidth. CA essentially allows mobile opera- INTRODUCTION tors to “widen the pipe” and enable higher data rates simply by the simultaneous use of more As the requirements of future cellular communi- spectrum as a dedicated resource to a single user. cations are being realized, there is an enormous LTE is defined to support flexible channel band- focus on the following top priorities for user widths from 1.4 MHz to a maximum of 20 MHz, equipment (UE) radio and RF front-end (RFFE) but these critical extra channels (each up to 20 development: MHz wide) can be added within a defined band • An incredible demand for higher data rates of operation (intra-band CA) or in additional dif- mandates advanced features into the UE. ferent bands of operation (inter-band CA). The • These features, and especially their simultane- number of combinations of the channel alloca- ous concurrent use, are significantly increas- tions and combinations of bands employed for ing handset complexity and performance CA in the standard has exponentially grown over challenges. the last several years, as indicated in the summary • More robust “always on” connections to the by the 3GPP Release in Fig. 1, and we see the Internet with an acceptable cell edge user continued use of CA as a vital part of increasing experience, even in the most challenging data rates for consumers [2]. This feature is fur- radio environments, are required. ther illustrated in Fig. 2, where the addition of The demand for higher data rates is clear from component carriers (CCs) that aggregate more the recently published statistics on mobile data bandwidth to the signal can benefit users through- growth [1] indicating that global mobile data traf- out the entire cell (all the way to cell edge). The fic will grow tenfold in five years, having acceler- darker shade of the larger number of aggregated Digital Object Identifier: 10.1109/MCOM.2017.1601221 The authors are with Skyworks Solutions, Inc. 134 0163-6804/17/$25.00 © 2017 IEEE IEEE Communications Magazine • April 2017 Mobile data traffic growth prediction 35 30.6 EB Growth in introduction of 3GPP specified CA 30 53% CAGR 2015 - 2020 combinations by release 546 21.7 EB 25 600 h t 500 Total CA combinations=900 20 14.9 EB ions t 400 es per mon t 15 9.9 EB A combina 300 Exaby C 10 6.2 EB 3.7 EB 200 107 123 5 Number of 100 3 21 0 0 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Rel 10 Rel 11 Rel 12 Rel 13 Rel 14 a) b) Band groups 2DL CA combinations Band groups 4DL CA combinations LB/MB 5/2, 5/66, 12/2, 12/66, 13/2, 13/66, 29/2, 29/66 LB/LB/LB/MB 2/5/12/12, 4/5/12/12 LB/HB 5/7, 12/7, 5/30, 12/30, 29/30 LB/LB/MB/MB 2/2/12/12, 2/2/5/5, 2/4/12/12, 2/4/5/5, 2/5/5/66, 4/4/12/12, LB/LAA 5/46, 12/46, 13/46 LB/LB/MB/HB 2/5/5/30, 4/5/5/30 MB/MB 2/4, 2/66, 2/2, 4/4, 25/25, 66/66 LB/MB/MB/MB 13/66/66/66, 2/13/66/66, 2/2/13/66, 2/2/5/66, 2/5/66/66, MB/HB 2/30, 2/7,m 4/30, 66/7 LB/HB/LAA/LAA 5/7/46/46 MB/LAA 2/46, 66/46 LB/LAA/LAA/LAA 13/46/46/46, 28/46/46/46, 5/46/46/46 HB/LAA 7/46, 41/46 MB/MB/MB/MB 2/2/66/66, 2/66/66/66 MB/MB/HB/HB 2/4/7/7 Band groups 3DL CA combinations MB/LAA/LAA/LAA 2/46/46/46, 4/46/46/46, 66/46/46/66 LB/LB/LB 5/12/12 HB/LAA/LAA/LAA 7/46/46/46 LB/LB/MB 2/12/12, 2/5/5, 4/12/12, 4/5/5, 5/5/66 LB/LB/HB 5/5/30 Band groups 5DL CA combinations LB/MB/MB 12/66/66, 13/66/66, 2/12/66, 2/13/66, 2/5/66 LB/LB/MB/MB/HB 2/2/5/5/30, 2/4/5/5/30, 4/4/5/5/30 LB/HB/HB 5/7/7 LB/HB/LAA/LAA/LAA 5/7/46/46/46 LB/LAA/LAA 13/46/46, 5/46/46 LB/LAA/LAA/LAA/LAA 5/46/46/46/46 MB/MB/MB 2/66/66 MB/LAA/LAA/LAA/LAA 2/46/46/46/46, 4/46/46/46/46, 66/46/46/46/46 MB/MB/HB 2/7/66 HB/LAA/LAA/LAA/LAA 7/46/46/46/46 MB/HB/HB 2/7/7, 4/7/7 LB: B12, B13, B29, B5, B26 MB/LAA/LAA 2/46/46, 4/46/46, 46/46/66 MB: B2, B25, B4, B66 HB/LAA/LAA 7/46/46 HB: B7, B30, B41 License assisted access (LAA): B46 c) Figure 1. a) Mobile data traffic per month and traffic growth predictions 2015–2020 (1 exabyte = 1018 bytes) [1]; b) exponential growth in the definition of band combinations employed for carrier aggregation as part of the 3GPP standard [2]; c) North Ameri- ca example of requirements for downlink CA combinations across 2DL, 3DL, 4DL, and 5DL use cases. CCs indicates higher throughput as this feature tively transmits multiple data streams (or layers) linearly increases data rate proportional to the from a number of antennas at the transmitter to total bandwidth employed. multiple antennas on the receiver. This applica- Another technique designed to increase the tion uses the spatial differences of the antenna spectral efficiency of bandwidth is to effectively reception and multi-path through varying radio increase the data rate in bits per Hertz. Termed environments of each data stream in order to “higher order modulation,” defined in 3GPP’s separate out the overlying signals even though Release 12 (spring 2015) to be a maximum of they are transmitted at the same frequency. This 256-quadratuer amplitude modulation (QAM) digital extraction of the signals based on known for the downlink (DL), and 3GPP’s Release 14 unique radio path transfer functions (derived (expected spring 2017) to support a maximum from reference signals within each link) enables of 256-QAM for the uplink (UL). As the standard a further multiplication factor of the data rate has started with modulations of quadrature phase according to the number of transmit/receive shift keying (QPSK) (2 bits/symbol), to 16-QAM antennas that are employed. As an example of (4 bits/symbol), to 64-QAM (6 bits/symbol), and the DL signals, if four data streams are transmit- now to 256-QAM (8 bits/symbol), the spectral ted from the base station (eNodeB) and four efficiency is increased by the factor of bits per separated antennas with low envelope correla- symbol.
Recommended publications
  • 3G/UMTS an Evolutionary Path to Next Generation Networks
    3G/UMTS An evolutionary path to Next Generation Networks ITU/BDT Regional Seminar on Fixed Mobile Convergence and Guidelines on the smooth transition of existing mobile networks to IMT-2000 for Developing Countries for Africa Jean-Pierre Bienaimé …………………………………………………………………………… Chairman, UMTS Forum www.umts-forum.org ITU/BDT Regional Seminar Nairobi 9-12 May 2005 Summary • What is the UMTS Forum? • What is the global status of 3G/UMTS launches? • What terminals, services and tariffs are available? • 3G/UMTS evolution from launch through to Release 6 • A look to the future • Viewpoint on spectrum • Lessons learned in Europe ITU/BDT Regional Seminar Nairobi 9-12 May 2005 1 About The UMTS Forum Who are we? An international, cross-sector industry body comprising operators, manufacturers, regulators, application developers, research organisations and IT industry players. Our mission… To promote a common vision of the development of 3G/UMTS and of its evolutions, and to ensure its worldwide commercial success. Our publications Since 1997, more than 40 reports on Spectrum & Regulation, 3G/UMTS vision, Customer behaviour, Market evolution & Forecasts, Technical studies & Implementation. Recent issues: Strategic Considerations for IMS – the 3G Evolution, Coverage Extension Bands for UMTS/IMT-2000 in the bands between 470-600 MHz, Magic Mobile Future 2010-2020… ITU/BDT Regional Seminar Nairobi 9-12 May 2005 UMTS Forum Key Areas of Activity in 2005 Spectrum & Regulation Studies and contributions on harmonisation of global spectrum and additional
    [Show full text]
  • Difference Between GSM, GPRS, EDGE, 3G, WCDMA, HSDPA and 4G
    Difference between GSM, GPRS, EDGE, 3G, WCDMA, HSDPA and 4G It's a very basic and non-technical comparison. GSM GSM, stands for Global Systems for Mobile Communications, is basic standard bearer of 2G technologies. It is mainly used in mobile communication. Short Messaging System (SMS) was introduced into GSM networks along with capability to download content from various service providers. The content could ring tone, logos and picture messages. It can support Voice telephony and data however the data rate is only 9.6Kb/s, that is very low bit rate for date communication. GPRS GPRS, stands for General Packet Radio Service, is used to give higher data speed over GSM. It is not the replacement of GSM. It is just an extension to the older GSM technology to gain faster speed. Multimedia Messaging System or MMS is the feature of GPRS. It allowed subscribers to send videos, pictures, or sound clips to each other just like text messages. GPRS also provided mobile handset the ability to surf the Internet at dial-up speeds through WAP enabled sites. GPRS offers higher bit rate (Up to 171kb/s) by usage of A packet-linked technology over GSM. EDGE EDGE stands for Enhanced Data Rates for GSM Evolution. This technology, also termed as Enhanced GPRS. This is a technology that uses the same equipment as GSM with only a few minor modifications to provide faster data speeds and is often regarded as a stepping stone towards 3G thus it is called 2.5G. EDGE gives the users the inimitable chance to increase the throughput capacity and the data speed at least 3 to 4 times higher to what GPRS offers.
    [Show full text]
  • 4G to 5G Networks and Standard Releases
    4G to 5G networks and standard releases CoE Training on Traffic engineering and advanced wireless network planning Sami TABBANE 30 September -03 October 2019 Bangkok, Thailand 1 Objectives Provide an overview of various technologies and standards of 4G and future 5G 2 Agenda I. 4G and LTE networks II. LTE Release 10 to 14 III. 5G 3 Agenda I. 4G and LTE networks 4 LTE/SAE 1. 4G motivations 5 Introduction . Geneva, 18 January 2012 – Specifications for next-generation mobile technologies – IMT-Advanced – agreed at the ITU Radiocommunications Assembly in Geneva. ITU determined that "LTELTELTE----AdvancedAdvancedAdvanced" and "WirelessMANWirelessMANWirelessMAN----AdvancedAdvancedAdvanced" should be accorded the official designation of IMTIMT----AdvancedAdvanced : . Wireless MANMAN- ---AdvancedAdvancedAdvanced:::: Mobile WiMax 2, or IEEE 802. 16m; . 3GPPLTE AdvancedAdvanced: LTE Release 10, supporting both paired Frequency Division Duplex (FDD) and unpaired Time Division Duplex (TDD) spectrum. 6 Needs for IMT-Advanced systems Need for higher data rates and greater spectral efficiency Need for a Packet Switched only optimized system Use of licensed frequencies to guarantee quality of services Always-on experience (reduce control plane latency significantly and reduce round trip delay) Need for cheaper infrastructure Simplify architecture of all network elements 7 Impact and requirements on LTE characteristics Architecture (flat) Frequencies (flexibility) Bitrates (higher) Latencies (lower) Cooperation with other technologies (all 3GPP and
    [Show full text]
  • A Survey on Mobile Wireless Networks Nirmal Lourdh Rayan, Chaitanya Krishna
    International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, Volume 5, Issue 1, January-2014 685 ISSN 2229-5518 A Survey on Mobile Wireless Networks Nirmal Lourdh Rayan, Chaitanya Krishna Abstract— Wireless communication is a transfer of data without using wired environment. The distance may be short (Television) or long (radio transmission). The term wireless will be used by cellular telephones, PDA’s etc. In this paper we will concentrate on the evolution of various generations of wireless network. Index Terms— Wireless, Radio Transmission, Mobile Network, Generations, Communication. —————————— —————————— 1 INTRODUCTION (TECHNOLOGY) er frequency of about 160MHz and up as it is transmitted be- tween radio antennas. The technique used for this is FDMA. In IRELESS telephone started with what you might call W terms of overall connection quality, 1G has low capacity, poor 0G if you can remember back that far. Just after the World War voice links, unreliable handoff, and no security since voice 2 mobile telephone service became available. In those days, calls were played back in radio antennas, making these calls you had a mobile operator to set up the calls and there were persuadable to unwanted monitoring by 3rd parties. First Gen- only a Few channels were available. 0G refers to radio tele- eration did maintain a few benefits over second generation. In phones that some had in cars before the advent of mobiles. comparison to 1G's AS (analog signals), 2G’s DS (digital sig- Mobile radio telephone systems preceded modern cellular nals) are very Similar on proximity and location. If a second mobile telephone technology. So they were the foregoer of the generation handset made a call far away from a cell tower, the first generation of cellular telephones, these systems are called DS (digital signal) may not be strong enough to reach the tow- 0G (zero generation) itself, and other basic ancillary data such er.
    [Show full text]
  • AT&T 3G Sunset
    Product Change Notification AT&T 3G Sunset - Impacts on 4G Devices LTE Category 1, Category 3 and Select Category 4 Models Date: March 9, 2021 I. Product Change Notification Number (PCN) PCN 03092021-02 II. Overview The purpose of this PCN is to avoid service interruption for certain MultiTech 4G products impacted by the impending AT&T 3G network sunset. 4G/LTE Category 1, 3 and 4 devices in the U.S. may no longer attach to the AT&T network after their 3G network sunset, scheduled for late February 2022. Voice-capable cellular modules integrated into several MultiTech products are configured for voice-centric signaling by default. These devices are likely to arrive at a No Service condition after 3G sunset -- even for data-only applications. This is a result of the module requiring a voice signal to connect to networks configured to leverage a combined attach (3G and LTE) for LTE device registration. The MultiTech products detailed in this PCN will be impacted by the 3G sunset. A software configuration change in the cellular module in these products is required in order to avoid a No Service condition. The only exception is for products with cellular modules supporting the IMS service Voice over LTE (VoLTE) and an accompanying VoLTE subscription from your service provider. MultiTech will immediately implement a software configuration change in our manufacturing process to include the required AT command to set a new permanent module default for its User Equipment (“UE”) settings. Note: future module firmware updates may impact this setting. Current default: CEMODE=1 (Voice centric) New default: CEMODE=2 (Data centric) For devices already deployed in the field, you must implement the above mentioned software- configuration change in each device to ensure continued service following the 3G sunset.
    [Show full text]
  • Skywire​®​ Development Kit SMS Example
    ® Skywire ​ Development Kit SMS ​ Example NimbeLink Corp Updated: August 2019 PN 30049 rev 14 NimbeLink Corp. All Rights Reserved. 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 1. Introduction 3 1.1 Orderable Part Numbers 3 1.2 Prerequisites 4 2. SMS Message 5 2.1 Send SMS Message 5 2.2 Receive SMS Messages 5 2.3 Delete Received SMS Messages 6 3. Troubleshooting 7 PN 30049 rev 14 NimbeLink Corp. All Rights Reserved. 2 1. Introduction 1.1 Orderable Part Numbers Orderable Device Description Carrier Network Type NL-SWDK Skywire Development Kit Any Any NL-SW-1xRTT-A 2G 1xRTT Aeris CDMA NL-SW-1xRTT-S 2G 1xRTT Sprint CDMA NL-SW-1xRTT-V 2G 1xRTT Verizon CDMA Any GSM (AT&T, NL-SW-GPRS 2G GPRS GSM T-Mobile, etc.) NL-SW-EVDO-A 3G EVDO, GPS, GLONASS Aeris CDMA NL-SW-EVDO-V 3G EVDO, GPS, GLONASS Verizon CDMA Any GSM (AT&T, NL-SW-HSPA 3G HSPA+, GPS, GLONASS GSM T-Mobile, etc.) Any GSM (AT&T, NL-SW-HSPA-B 3G HSPA+, GPS, GLONASS GSM T-Mobile, etc.) NL-SW-LTE-TSVG LTE CAT 3 without Fallback, GPS, GLONASS Verizon LTE NL-SW-LTE-TSVG-B LTE CAT 3 without Fallback, GPS, GLONASS Verizon LTE Any GSM (AT&T, NL-SW-LTE-TNAG LTE CAT 3 with HSPA+ Fallback, GPS, GLONASS LTE, GSM T-Mobile, etc.) Any GSM (AT&T, NL-SW-LTE-TNAG-B LTE CAT 3 with HSPA+ Fallback, GPS, GLONASS LTE, GSM T-Mobile, etc.) LTE CAT 3 with HSPA+ Fallback, GPS, GLONASS, NL-SW-LTE-TEUG Any EU GSM LTE, GSM EU NL-SW-LTE-S7618RD LTE CAT1 Verizon LTE NL-SW-LTE-S7648 LTE CAT1 AT&T/T-Mobile LTE NL-SW-LTE-S7588-V LTE CAT4 with HSPA+ Fallback Verizon LTE NL-SW-LTE-S7588-V-B LTE CAT4 with HSPA+ Fallback Verizon LTE NL-SW-UAV-S7588 LTE CAT4 with HSPA+ Fallback Verizon LTE NL-SW-LTE-S7588-T LTE CAT4 with HSPA+ Fallback AT&T LTE, GSM NL-SW-LTE-S7588-T-C LTE CAT4 with HSPA+ Fallback AT&T LTE, GSM Any GSM (AT&T, NL-SW-LTE-WM14 CAT1 LTE, GSM GSM T-Mobile, etc.) NL-SW-LTE-SVZM20 LTE CAT M1 Verizon LTE NL-SW-LTE-TC4NAG LTE CAT4 Verizon/AT&T LTE NL-SW-LTE-TC4EU LTE CAT 4 EU European Carriers LTE PN 30049 rev 14 NimbeLink Corp.
    [Show full text]
  • CDMA2000 – a New Challenge for 3G Mobile Radio Testers
    MOBILE RADIO Radiocommunication testers Universal Radio Communication Tester R&S CMU200 CDMA2000 – a new challenge for 3G mobile radio testers The CDMA world is facing its next The CDMA2000 market 120 100 decisive step: the introduction of Since the launch of the first commercial 80 cdmaOne network in Hong Kong in 60 CDMA2000 1X, handling packet data September 1995, CDMA has established 40 itself worldwide as a mobile radio Subscribers (millions) 20 rates of up to 307.2 kbit/s. The standard. It has advanced triumphantly 0 far beyond the USA, its country of origin, Jun. 98 Jun. 99 Jun. 00 Jun. 01 future-oriented measurement platform Korea and Japan. With rocketing growth Dec. 97 Dec. 98 Dec. 99 Dec. 00 Dec. 01 rates, CDMA ranks besides GSM as a Universal Radio Communication Tester major digital standard of the second FIG 1 Development of cdmaOne/CDMA2000 subscriber figures generation. Now the CDMA world is R&S CMU200 also supports this third- entering a new and decisive phase, the introduction of CDMA2000 1X, which is generation mobile radio standard. capable of working with packet data rates of up to 307.2 kbit/s. in Korea and Japan is almost saturated, the highest growth rates have lately In recent years, cdmaOne has expanded come from North and South America, tremendously fast. In April 1998, there and a large market is emerging in were around ten million subscribers China. The network operator China worldwide, but now more than Unicom is presently setting up a 100 million customers make their calls cdmaOne/CDMA2000 network, with through CDMA networks (FIG 1).
    [Show full text]
  • 4G LTE Standards
    Standard of 4G LTE Jia SHEN CAICT 1 Course Objectives: Evolution of LTE-Advanced LTE-Advanced pro 2 2 Evolution of LTE/LTE-A technology standard Peak rate LTE-Advanced 3Gbps R10 R11 R12 LTE • Distributed • D2D R9 antenna • TDD Flexible 300Mbps R8 • dual layer CoMP slot beamformi • Enhanced allocation ng • CA MIMO • 3D MIMO • Terminal • Enhanced • OFDM • Enhanced CA • … location MIMO • MIMO • … technology • Relay • … • HetNet 2008 2009 • … 2011 2012 2014 Terminal location technology dual layer3 beamforming CA Enhanced antenna Relay Course Objectives: Evolution of LTE-Advanced CA Enhanced MIMO CoMP eICIC Relay LTE-Advanced pro 4 4 Principle of carrier aggregation (CA) Carrier aggregation • In order to satisfy the design of LTE-A system with the maximum bandwidth of 100MHz, and to maintain the backward compatibility,3GPP proposed carrier aggregation. In the LTE-A system, the maximum bandwidth of a single carrier is 20MHz Participate in the aggregati on of the various LTE carrier is known as the LTE-A mem ber carrier (Component Car rier, CC) Standard Considering the backward compatibility of LTE system, the maximum bandwidth of a single carrier unit is 20M Hz in the LTE-A system. All carrier units will be designed to be compatible with LTE, but at this stage it does not exclude the considerati on of non - backward compatible carriers. In the LTE-A FDD system, the terminal can be configured to aggregate different bandwidth, different number o f carriers. For TDD LTE-A systems, the number of uplink and downlink carriers is the same in a typical scence. In the LTE-A system, CA supports up to 5 DL carriers.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance of International Roaming Location Update in 3G and 4G Networks
    Performance of International roaming Location Update in 3G and 4G networks Contact Information: Sanaz Moshirian Author(s): Sanaz Moshirian E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] External advisor(s): Anders Högsell Hi3G Access AB Address: Lindhagensgatan 98, 112 51 Stockholm, Sweden Phone: +46735333333 University advisor(s): Dr.Patrik Arlos Department of Communication systems Internet : www.bth.se School of Computing Faculty of Computing Phone : +46 455 38 50 00 Blekinge Institute of Technology Blekinge Institute of Technology Fax : +46 455 38 50 57 371 79 Karlskrona Sweden Faculty ABSTRACT Since Mobile network operator (MNO) relies on many Business Support Systems (BSS) and Operation Support Systems (OSS) it should be assured that operator’s systems supports the requirements of the future. This thesis shall focus on the “start-to-end” aspects that must be considered to ensure that International Roaming continues to operate flawless. The thesis experience Long Term Evolution (LTE) in case of international roaming by measuring the end to end location update delay. In order to evaluate the LTE performance of international roaming, the delay time has been measured by the means of tracing tools for several different international roamers and the results has been compared with the results achieved for local user. The outcome has been compared with the respecting results in 3G network the statistical results has been provided and the graphs has been plotted to study the performance. Based on the results obtain on this thesis, it has been concluded that local user acts more stable to get attach to the network, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Improving Mobile Signal
    IMPROVING MOBILE SIGNAL Introduction The purpose of this guide is to educate consumers on ways to improve their mobile signal and also find the causes of their poor signal. One of the biggest complaints mobile users make is having poor signal. Not being able to make a call, missing calls and having slow internet speeds is often very frustrating. For businesses not being able to receive calls can mean revenue loss and upset customers. Never fear there is a solution to improving your signal and within this guide I will explain the many ways you can improve your signal and stay connected. Page 1 ‐ www.mobilenetworkguide.com.au Contents Introduction 1 Contents 2 Mobile Phone Networks How Do They Work 3 Base Station Types 3 Cell Coverage 4 Mobile Black Spots 4 How Signal Effects Calls, SMS and Data 4 Lower Mobile Frequencies Offer the Best Range 5 Causes of Poor Mobile Reception Distance from the Tower 6 Physical Obstructions 6 Building Structures 6 Interference 7 Network Issues 7 Network Congestion 7 Coverage Checkers 7 How to Locate a Mobile Base Station 8 How to Measure Mobile Signal Signal Bars 9 Exact Readings 10 Field Test, Service & Engineering Modes 11 Apps That Measure Signal Strength 12 Solutions to Improve Mobile Signal Antennas 13 Passive Repeater 14 Smart Repeater 15 Femtocell 15 Changing Mobile Providers 16 Purchase a New Mobile Device 16 Contact Your Mobile Provider 16 Carrier Solutions 17 Further Information 17 Page 2 ‐ www.mobilenetworkguide.com.au Mobile Phone Networks How Do They Work? A mobile phone network or cellular phone network as it is also known, is made up of a large number of signal areas called cells.
    [Show full text]
  • LTE Evolution: Standardization & Deployment the Long Run to 5G
    Telit IoT Connectivity LTE Evolution: Standardization & Deployment The Long Run to 5G By: Mauro Lodolo | Program Manager Mobile Broadband Contents Introduction 3 LTE Standardization 5 LTE 6 LTE-Advanced 6 LTE-Advanced-Pro 7 5G 9 Key Technologies in Depth 11 LTE Carrier Aggregation in Unlicensed Spectrum 11 Use Case: Fixed-LTE CPE 13 Use Case: Small Cells 14 Antenna Techniques, MIMO 15 Higher-Order Modulations Schemes 17 Telit Portfolio 17 Conclusions 19 References 21 2 Introduction In the continuous and fast changing landscape of mobile telecommunications, the 3GPP (3rd Generation Partnership Project) Release 15 has just kicked off officially triggering officially the new era of fifth Generation of Telecommunication: 5G. Legacy technologies are still deployed and the market. Among them, incotrovertibly, LTE (Long Term Evolution) has been playing a key role in the adoption of 4G (fourth Generation) since it was commercially launched in early 2010. In a matter of a few years, LTE has been successfully deployed around the world driving the entire wireless ecosystem to connect over 1 in 4 mobile users worldwide, a trend that is continuing to grow tremendously [1]. Many Mobile Network Operators (MNO) have heavily invested in the LTE network rollouts across the world for the transition from the 2G/3G (second/third Generation) to 4G. This deployment has been an instrumental step to enhance the Mobile Broadband (MBB) proposition and improved coverage, as well as for offering more attractively priced data tariffs, greater availability and affordability of higher speed devices. The generational shift that is gaining momentum on the wave of the continuous enhancements and new features that the standard introduces has made LTE the fastest developing mobile technology ever.
    [Show full text]
  • Mobile TV Technologies Zahid Ghadialy March 2006
    Mobile TV Technologies Zahid Ghadialy March 2006 © 2006 Zahid Ghadialy What is Mobile TV Mobile TV Broadcasting allows the user to watch their favourite TV programs such as dramas, news, music, sports and documentaries on their mobile device. The service works by receiving a specialised digital TV broadcast signal from the air in much the same way as televisions at home will do in future. Channel guides will also be broadcast allowing users to keep abreast of the latest programs on air. It is not the same as a streaming video service over 3G or GPRS, but one which is optimised for longer period TV viewing by large numbers of simultaneous users with high picture quality and low battery power consumption. Mobile TV Technologies BCMCS: BroadCast MultiCast Services (3GPP2) DVB-H: Digital Video Braodcasting-Handheld (ETSI) ISDB-T: Integrated Service Digital Broadcasting – Terrestrial (ARIB) T-DMB: Terrestrial Digital Multimedia Broadcasting (Korean Standard) MediaFLO: Media Forward Link Only (Qualcomm proprietary) MBMS is not Mobile TV MBMS uses existing 3G Spectrum whereas Mobile TV needs new frequency spectrum Channel switching is faster using Mobile TV technologies compared to MBMS Very little number of channels using MBMS are possible as compared to Mobile TV technologies Battery life is much less if MBMS is used as compared to Mobile TV technologies Higher coverage possible with Mobile TV technologies Mobile TV Technologies In Depth Analysis Qualcomm has pulled together The FLO Forum, (Forward Link Only) which is pushing to standardize this Qualcomm’s technology for transmitting multimedia content to mobile devices. MediaFLO Qualcomm proprietary It uses unidirectional COFDM (Coded Orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing) Its under the process of standardisation Interested parties include LG, Sanyo, Sharp, Huawei In US, MediaFLO will deliver 29 channels on TV channel 55.
    [Show full text]