Author's Personal Copy
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Are Cattle Surrogate Wildlife? Savanna Plant Community Composition Explained by Total Herbivory More Than Herbivore Type
Ecological Applications, 26(6), 2016, pp. 1610–1623 © 2016 by the Ecological Society of America Are cattle surrogate wildlife? Savanna plant community composition explained by total herbivory more than herbivore type KARI E. VEBLEN,1,2,6 LAUREN M. PORENSKY,2,3 CORINNA RIGINOS,2,4 AND TRUMAN P. YOUNG2,5 1Department of Wildland Resources and Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, Utah 84322 USA 2Mpala Research Centre, P.O. Box 555, Nanyuki, Kenya 3USDA-ARS Rangeland Resources Research Unit, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526 USA 4Department of Zoology and Physiology, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Wyoming 82071 USA 5Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, California 95616 USA Abstract. The widespread replacement of wild ungulate herbivores by domestic livestock in African savannas is composed of two interrelated phenomena: (1) loss or reduction in numbers of individual wildlife species or guilds and (2) addition of livestock to the system. Each can have important implications for plant community dynamics. Yet very few studies have experimentally addressed the individual, combined, and potentially interactive effects of wild vs. domestic herbivore species on herbaceous plant communities within a single system. Additionally, there is little information about whether, and in which contexts, livestock might functionally replace native herbivore wildlife or, alternatively, have fundamentally different effects on plant species composition. The Kenya Long-term Exclosure Experiment, which has been running since 1995, is composed of six treatment combinations of mega- herbivores, meso- herbivore ungulate wildlife, and cattle. We sampled herbaceous vegetation 25 times between 1999 and 2013. We used partial redundancy analysis and linear mixed models to assess effects of herbivore treatments on overall plant community composition and key plant species. -
Introductory Grass Identification Workshop University of Houston Coastal Center 23 September 2017
Broadleaf Woodoats (Chasmanthium latifolia) Introductory Grass Identification Workshop University of Houston Coastal Center 23 September 2017 1 Introduction This 5 hour workshop is an introduction to the identification of grasses using hands- on dissection of diverse species found within the Texas middle Gulf Coast region (although most have a distribution well into the state and beyond). By the allotted time period the student should have acquired enough knowledge to identify most grass species in Texas to at least the genus level. For the sake of brevity grass physiology and reproduction will not be discussed. Materials provided: Dried specimens of grass species for each student to dissect Jewelry loupe 30x pocket glass magnifier Battery-powered, flexible USB light Dissecting tweezer and needle Rigid white paper background Handout: - Grass Plant Morphology - Types of Grass Inflorescences - Taxonomic description and habitat of each dissected species. - Key to all grass species of Texas - References - Glossary Itinerary (subject to change) 0900: Introduction and house keeping 0905: Structure of the course 0910: Identification and use of grass dissection tools 0915- 1145: Basic structure of the grass Identification terms Dissection of grass samples 1145 – 1230: Lunch 1230 - 1345: Field trip of area and collection by each student of one fresh grass species to identify back in the classroom. 1345 - 1400: Conclusion and discussion 2 Grass Structure spikelet pedicel inflorescence rachis culm collar internode ------ leaf blade leaf sheath node crown fibrous roots 3 Grass shoot. The above ground structure of the grass. Root. The below ground portion of the main axis of the grass, without leaves, nodes or internodes, and absorbing water and nutrients from the soil. -
Guidelines for Using the Checklist
Guidelines for using the checklist Cymbopogon excavatus (Hochst.) Stapf ex Burtt Davy N 9900720 Synonyms: Andropogon excavatus Hochst. 47 Common names: Breëblaarterpentyngras A; Broad-leaved turpentine grass E; Breitblättriges Pfeffergras G; dukwa, heng’ge, kamakama (-si) J Life form: perennial Abundance: uncommon to locally common Habitat: various Distribution: southern Africa Notes: said to smell of turpentine hence common name E2 Uses: used as a thatching grass E3 Cited specimen: Giess 3152 Reference: 37; 47 Botanical Name: The grasses are arranged in alphabetical or- Rukwangali R der according to the currently accepted botanical names. This Shishambyu Sh publication updates the list in Craven (1999). Silozi L Thimbukushu T Status: The following icons indicate the present known status of the grass in Namibia: Life form: This indicates if the plant is generally an annual or G Endemic—occurs only within the political boundaries of perennial and in certain cases whether the plant occurs in water Namibia. as a hydrophyte. = Near endemic—occurs in Namibia and immediate sur- rounding areas in neighbouring countries. Abundance: The frequency of occurrence according to her- N Endemic to southern Africa—occurs more widely within barium holdings of specimens at WIND and PRE is indicated political boundaries of southern Africa. here. 7 Naturalised—not indigenous, but growing naturally. < Cultivated. Habitat: The general environment in which the grasses are % Escapee—a grass that is not indigenous to Namibia and found, is indicated here according to Namibian records. This grows naturally under favourable conditions, but there are should be considered preliminary information because much usually only a few isolated individuals. -
Tesis Amarilla, Leonardo David.Pdf (5.496Mb)
Universidad Nacional de Córdoba Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Físicas y Naturales Estudio Poblacional y Filogenético en Munroa (Poaceae, Chloridoideae) Lic. Leonardo David Amarilla Tesis para optar al grado de Doctor en Ciencias Biológicas Directora: Dra. Ana M. Anton Co-Director: Dr. Jorge O. Chiapella Asesora de Tesis: Dra. Victoria Sosa Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal CONICET-UNC Córdoba, Argentina 2014 Comisión Asesora de Tesis Dra. Ana M. Anton, IMBIV, Córdoba. Dra. Noemí Gardenal, IDEA, Córdoba. Dra. Liliana Giussani, IBODA, Buenos Aires. Defensa Oral y Pública Lugar y Fecha: Calificación: Tribunal evaluador de Tesis Firma………………………………… Aclaración…………………………………... Firma………………………………… Aclaración…………………………………... Firma………………………………… Aclaración…………………………………... “Tengamos ideales elevados y pensemos en alcanzar grandes cosas, porque como la vida rebaja siempre y no se logra sino una parte de lo que se ansía, soñando muy alto alcanzaremos mucho más” Bernardo Alberto Houssay A mis padres y hermanas Quiero expresar mi más profundo agradecimiento a mis directores de tesis, la Dra. Ana M. Anton y el Dr. Jorge O. Chiapella, por todo lo que me enseñaron en cuanto a sistemática y taxonomía de gramíneas, por sus consejos, acompañamiento y dedicación. De la misma manera, quiero agradecer a la Dra. Victoria Sosa (INECOL A.C., Veracruz, Xalapa, México) por su acompañamiento y por todo lo que me enseñó en cuando a filogeografía y genética de poblaciones. Además quiero agradecer… A mis compañeros de trabajo: Nicolás Nagahama, Raquel Scrivanti, Federico Robbiati, Lucia Castello, Jimena Nores, Marcelo Gritti. A los curadores y equipo técnico del Museo Botánico de Córdoba. A la Dra. Reneé Fortunato. A la Dra. Marcela M. Manifesto. A la Dra. -
Conservation Plant Release Brochure for Kinney Germplasm False
A Conservation Plant Released by the Natural Resources Conservation Service E. “Kika” de la Garza Plant Materials Center, Kingsville, Texas Kinney Germplasm false Rhodes grass Trichloris crinita (Lag.) Parodi Kinney Germplasm false Rhodes grass [Trichloris crinita (Lag.) Parodi and previously known as Chloris crinita Lag.] was released by the USDA NRCS E. “Kika” de la Garza Plant Materials Center in 1999. It is a selected plant material class of certified seed. Description False Rhodes grass is a native, warm-season perennial bunchgrass. It is also commonly known as two flower trichloris. It grows 1 to 2 feet tall, with leaves 3 to 8 inches long. Plants produce dense, feathery, 1- to 2-inch long seedheads that turn from green to light brown or blonde at maturity (Fig. 1). Source Kinney Germplasm false Rhodes grass was originally collected near Brackettville, Texas. This single population was chosen from a comparison with nine other collections because of its ability to survive during a prolonged period of drought. It also produced more seed heads and greened up earlier than most of the accessions. Conservation Uses False Rhodes grass should be used primarily as a component in seed mixtures for Figure 1. Kinney Germplasm false Rhodes grass range restoration. It has potential for use in pasture plantings, filter strips, erosion control plantings, and landscaping. Area of Adaptation and Use False Rhodes grass grows best on sandy to sandy loam soils. It will tolerate soils that are weakly saline. Its natural range is San Antonio, Texas, south into the western two-thirds of the Rio Grande Plain and westward to Arizona. -
Plants of Concern in American Samoa,” Is to Determine Which Plant Species May in the Future Need Some Kind of Protection in the Territory
PLANTS OF CONCERN IN AMERICAN SAMOA by W. ARTHUR WHISTLER ISLE BOTANICA HONOLULU, HAWAI‘I for THE U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE HONOLULU, HAWAI‘I 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOSE OF THE PRESENT STUDY …………………………………………............ 1 INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………… 1 American Samoa ………………………………………………………………….. 1 Previous Botanical Work …………………………………………………………. 2 The Flora …………………………………………………………………….…..... 3 METHODOLOGY ………………………………………………………………….……. 4 Modifications to the Flora ………………………………………………………… 4 Compilation of the Data …………………………………………………………... 6 Entering the Data ………………………………………………………………….. 6 DISCUSSION …………………………………………………………………………….. 7 RECOMMENDATIONS …………………………………….…........................................ 9 REFERENCES CITED ……………………………………………………...…………… 11 APPENDICES APPENDIX A. PLANT SPECIES OF CONCERN IN AMERICAN SAMOA ..………… 13 APPENDIX B. GPS LOCATIONS OF THREE SAMOAN PLANTS OF CONCERN … 57 APPENDIX C. GIS TABLES …………………………………………………… Attached APPENDIX D. GIS MAPS …………..………………………………………….. Attached ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The principal investigator would like to thank those who assisted him in this project, particularly Ron Salz of the Honolulu office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, who entered all the GIS information into the data base and prepared the maps, and Holly Freifeld of the same office, who facilitated the project. He would also like to thank Territorial Forester Sheri Mann for coordinating a workshop on species of concern in American Samoa for the Land Grant program at the American Samoa community, and for Dr. -
The North American Species of Smilacina
Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1945-05-01 The North American species of Smilacina Desma H. Galway Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Galway, Desma H., "The North American species of Smilacina" (1945). Theses and Dissertations. 8057. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/8057 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The North American Species of Smilacina DESMA H. GALWAY Reprinted from "THE AMERICANMIDLAND NATURALIST' Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 644-666, May, 1945 n..unt~Pr.a Notre Dame. In d. The North AmericanSpecies of Smilacina Desma H. Galway Introduction This paper is the result of a taxonomic study of the species of the genus S milacinaoccurring naturally in North America north of Mexico. In the past it has been difficult to make satisfactory determinations of members of this genus from existing manuals, especially among western forms. West of the great plains the great diversity in environmental conditions has given rise to a diversity in form of the species that are widely distributed. Many of these forms have been given specific or varietal names recently, and as no compre- hensive work on the genus has been done since most of these were published, it is hoped that this study will be generally helpful in identifying members of the group. During the preparation of this work over 2500 herbarium specimens have been examined and annotated and comparative measurements made of many of these. -
A Molecular Phylogeny and Classification of the Eleusininae with a New Genus, Micrachne (Poaceae: Chloridoideae: Cynodonteae)
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271851457 A molecular phylogeny and classification of the Eleusininae with a new genus, Micrachne (Poaceae: Chloridoideae: Cynodonteae) Article in Taxon · June 2015 DOI: 10.12705/643.5 CITATIONS READS 17 379 3 authors, including: Paul M. Peterson Konstantin Romaschenko Smithsonian Institution M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany 446 PUBLICATIONS 2,908 CITATIONS 94 PUBLICATIONS 1,057 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: TRINIUS: Trinius, Carl Bernhard (1778-1844) Literature & Herbarium View project Revisions of Leptochloa (Poaceae) sensu lato View project All content following this page was uploaded by Konstantin Romaschenko on 16 July 2015. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. TAXON 64 (3) • June 2015: 445–467 Peterson & al. • Phylogeny and classification of the Eleusininae A molecular phylogeny and classification of the Eleusininae with a new genus, Micrachne (Poaceae: Chloridoideae: Cynodonteae) Paul M. Peterson,1 Konstantin Romaschenko1,2 & Yolanda Herrera Arrieta3 1 Smithsonian Institution, Department of Botany, National Museum of Natural History, Washington D.C. 20013-7012, U.S.A. 2 M.G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, National Academy of Sciences, Kiev 01601, Ukraine 3 Instituto Politécnico Nacional, CIIDIR Unidad Durango-COFAA, Durango, C.P. 34220, Mexico Author for correspondence: Paul M. Peterson, [email protected] ORCID: PMP, http://orcid.org/0000000194055528; KR, http://orcid.org/0000000272484193 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.12705/643.5 Abstract The subtribe Eleusininae (Poaceae: Chloridoideae: Cynodonteae) is a diverse group containing about 212 species in 31 genera found primarily in low latitudes in Africa, Asia, Australia, and the Americas, and the classification among these genera and species is poorly understood. -
Large Trees, Supertrees, and Diversification of the Grass Family Trevor R
Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 23 | Issue 1 Article 19 2007 Large Trees, Supertrees, and Diversification of the Grass Family Trevor R. Hodkinson Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland Nicolas Salamin University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland Mark W. Chase Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK Yanis Bouchenak-Khelladi Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland Stephen A. Renvoize Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, UK See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons, and the Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Hodkinson, Trevor R.; Salamin, Nicolas; Chase, Mark W.; Bouchenak-Khelladi, Yanis; Renvoize, Stephen A.; and Savolainen, Vincent (2007) "Large Trees, Supertrees, and Diversification of the Grass Family," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 23: Iss. 1, Article 19. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol23/iss1/19 Large Trees, Supertrees, and Diversification of the Grass Family Authors Trevor R. Hodkinson, Nicolas Salamin, Mark W. Chase, Yanis Bouchenak-Khelladi, Stephen A. Renvoize, and Vincent Savolainen This article is available in Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol23/iss1/ 19 Aliso 23, pp. 248–258 ᭧ 2007, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden LARGE TREES, SUPERTREES, AND DIVERSIFICATION OF THE GRASS FAMILY TREVOR R. HODKINSON,1,5 NICOLAS SALAMIN,2 MARK W. CHASE,3 YANIS BOUCHENAK-KHELLADI,1,3 STEPHEN A. RENVOIZE,4 -
Cattle-Breeding Valley Plains and C4 Spontaneous Grasses in North Patagonia
Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering A9 (2020) 266-272 doi:10.17265/2162-5298/2020.06.006 D DAVID PUBLISHING Cattle-Breeding Valley Plains and C4 Spontaneous Grasses in North Patagonia M. Guadalupe Klich Universidad Nacional de Río Negro, Escuela de Veterinaria y Producción Agroindustrial, CIT-UNRN-CONICET, Choele Choel 8360, Argentina Abstract: The climate of North Patagonia (Argentina) is semiarid and the region periodically suffers severe droughts that may last several years, decreasing forage offer and consequently cow livestock and productivity. In most of the cattle fields extensive grazing is usually continuous through the year-long. The absence of pasture rotational schemata affects rangeland health changing the composition of plants communities in detriment of the valuable species. When under a severe drought, the appreciated forage Leptochloa crinita (= Trichloris crinita) stopped reproduction and the population became scarce, a grazing schedule was designed in a cattle farm to avoid foraging during spring and summer in a paddock located in the valley plains, where the species was disappearing. Besides L. crinita populations, the sympatric presence of the Poaceae Aristida mendocina, Distichlis spicata and Distichlis scoparia is expected, each one in slightly different patches within the same area. The forage value differs between species but all of them are eaten by bovines. For ten years the plant communities were studied with the aims of determining the incidence of the patches on the paddock carrying capacity in early autumn and estimating the contribution of the four C4 species to bovine diet by microhistology. Free of grazing during its growing period, L. crinite enhanced the area of its patches and the biomass production of its good quality forage and was consumed preferently. -
Hartebeests in Ethiopia
99 Hartebeests in Ethiopia Melvin Bo/ton In this report on his field survey of Ethiopian hartebeests, two of which—Swayne's, now extinct outside Ethiopia, and the tora—are in the Red Data Book, Melvin Bolton describes the known populations and recommends the appropriate conservation measures. His most encouraging discovery was a population—unfortunately in a heavily cultivated area—of at least 500 Swayne's hartebeest, bringing the estimated total for this subspecies to 600—700. His study shows that it is not always easy to ascribe all hartebeests to the three main subspecies or races, and he describes two intergrades with distinctive features. The field work was helped with small grants from the FPS and the WWF. The hartebeest is still one of the more widespread of large African antelopes although no longer occurring in parts of its former range. If, as some authorities believe, all the forms of A Icelaphus are con- specific then A. buselaphus extends from Senegal in the west to Ethiopia in the east and south to the Cape. In Ethiopia three distinct subspecies or races are found: A. b. lelwel, A. b. tora and A. b. swaynei; the last two are in the IUCN Red Data Book. For convenience in presentation, all Ethiopian hartebeests will be considered under the headings of these three subspecies. Tora Hartebeest A reddish fawn animal with horns which diverge widely outwards from the pedicle then upwards, so that in front view they present a shape often likened to a curly bracket lying on its side, the tora hartebeest occurs in eastern Sudan and north-western Ethiopia. -
Northern Territory NT Page 1 of 204 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region Northern Territory, Northern Territory
Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.