DOCSLIB.ORG

Dakota County East-West Transit Study FINAL REPORT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Dakota County East-West Transit Study FINAL REPORT March 2017 Dakota County East-West Transit Study FINAL REPORT Acknowledgements TAC Committee Members Aaron Bartling, MVTA Jen Lehmann, MVTA Kathy Bodmer, City of Apple Valley Kim Lindquist, City of Rosemount Ben Boike, City of West St. Paul Tom Link, City of Inver Grove Heights Kurt Chatfield, Dakota County John Mazzitello, City of Mendota Heights Heidi Corcoran, Dakota County John Mertens, Dakota County Pam Dudziak, City of Eagan Cameron Muhic, MnDOT Jenni Faulkner, City of Burnsville David Olson, City of Lakeville Lisa Freese, Scott County Molly Park, City of Sunfish Lake Ryan Garcia, City of South St. Paul Amy Patnode, City of Eagan Joe Gladke, Hennepin County Joseph Scala, Hennepin County Andy Gitzlaff, Ramsey County Regional Railroad Connor Schaefer, Washington County Authority Angie Stenson, Scott County Peter Hellegers, City of South St. Paul Sarah Thomas, City of Eagan Cole Hiniker, Metropolitan Council Scott Thompson, Metro Transit Neal Hildebrandt, Dakota County Community Development Agency Hally Turner, Washington County John Hinzman, City of Hastings Tony Wippler, City of Farmington Jarrett Hubbard, Scott County Katie White, Metropolitan Council Emily Jorgensen, Washington County Courtney Whited, DARTS Carl Jensen, MnDOT Kyle Klatt, City of Rosemount Steering Committee Members Cyndi Harper, Metro Transit Amy Vennewitz, Metropolitan Council Jane Kansier, MVTA Katie White, Metropolitan Council Mark Krebsbach, Dakota County Luther Wynder, MVTA Jen Lehmann, MVTA i Policymaker Work Group Ann Bailey, DARTS Tom Lawell, City of Apple Valley Karla Bigham, Washington County Matt Little, City of Lakeville Karen Bremer, Nininger Township Mark Lofthus, Dakota County Steven Chavez, Metropolitan Council Tim Mayasich, Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority William Droste, City of Rosemount Scott McBride, MnDOT Maggie Dykes, Dakota County Bruce Nordquist, City of Apple Valley Chris Gerlach, Dakota County Dave Osberg, City of Eagan Jenny Halverson, West St. Paul Matt Parent, Dakota County Mary Hamann-Roland, City of Apple Valley Nancy Schouweiler, Dakota County Gary Hansen, City of Eagan Mary Schultz, City of Lilydale Steve Haschig, DARTS Michael Slavik, Dakota County Clint Hooppaw, MVTA Tom Taylor, City of Burnsville Elizabeth Kautz, City of Burnsville George Tourville, Inver Grove Heights Ed Kearney, City of Apple Valley Liz Workman, Dakota County Sandra Krebsbach, Mendota Heights Dakota County Staff Kristine Elwood, Dakota County Joe Morneau, Dakota County Consultant Team Chelsey Hendrickson, Kimley-Horn Steven Ruegg, Parsons Brinkerhoff Anna Potter, Kimley-Horn Brian Smalkoski, Kimley-Horn ii Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................ ES-1 CHAPTER 1 Background and Context ............................................................................ 1 CHAPTER 2 Related Projects and Plans ........................................................................ 7 CHAPTER 3 Study Area Characteristics ......................................................................13 CHAPTER 4 Stakeholder Engagement .........................................................................21 CHAPTER 5 Evaluation Framework ...............................................................................29 CHAPTER 6 Travel Demand Analysis ............................................................................33 CHAPTER 7 Corridor Evaulation .....................................................................................37 CHAPTER 8 Recommendations.......................................................................................41 iii Executive Summary East-west transit connectivity has come up Stakeholder Engagement Strategies frequently as an important topic as each transitway is studied in Dakota County. Regional agencies, counties, and local As one nears the center of the Twin Cities entities have completed a total of 34 Metropolitan Area, the range of transit plans, studies, and projects that have service options and coverage is much greater or may have an influence on transit than it is within and through Dakota County. service in the study area. Most projects With the primarily north-south orientation and plans reviewed are supportive of expanding transit service in Dakota of the METRO Red, Orange, and Blue Lines County. as well as the north-south orientation of the planned Robert Street and Red Rock Corridors, all existing and planned transitway service in the area is largely designed to Study Area provide frequent service into the downtown cores of Minneapolis or Saint Paul. However, Characteristics many residents lack reliable options to The study area included the cities of Mendota connect to transit centers, major destinations, Heights, West St. Paul, South St. Paul, and employment opportunities within and Mendota, Lilydale, Sunfish Lake, Inver Grove surrounding Dakota County. Developing Heights, Eagan, Burnsville, Apple Valley, improved east-west service to provide a Rosemount, Coates, Hastings, Lakeville, and more comprehensive network for Dakota Farmington and the townships of Nininger, County, its cities, and the surrounding Marshan, Vermillion, Ravenna, and Empire. counties is critical to support these growing The East-West Transit Study also considered communities. transit options that extended outside the study area or the county if there were logical Purpose of Study or compelling destinations or connections. The Dakota County East-West Transit Study Study area characteristics were reviewed and (East-West Transit Study) was needed to analyzed in order to better understand the address existing and emerging needs for east- demographics, travel patterns, development west oriented transit in the county. The East- patterns, and infrastructure within the study West Transit Study looked for opportunities area that may inform the need for transit. to improve the quality of fixed route transit service in Dakota County and improve Demographics connections to the regional transit system by The highest concentrations of minority identifying and evaluating potential transit residents live in the northern and western corridors. Recommendations were developed parts of the study area. The areas with to improve connections to employment, the highest percentage of people with low improve mobility to and from areas adjacent incomes (living under 185 percent of the to the county, and expand the range of travel poverty line) are in South St. Paul, West St. options for transit-dependent populations. Paul, and Burnsville. Most of those living in the study area have access to a personal vehicle, and most speak English very well. ES-1 Figure 0.1: Composite Map of Study Area Characteristics Travel and Development Patterns operate 35 local and express transit routes throughout the study area. The western and northern parts of the study area include a variety of residential, commercial, and institutional land uses and Stakeholder Engagement have higher population and employment density than the largely agricultural eastern The goal of the public engagement efforts for and southern parts of the study area. the East-West Transit Study was to engage Important destinations and regional job and the public and stakeholders in identifying activity centers are more common in the and evaluating existing and future east-west northern and western part of the study area. oriented transit needs. A Public Involvement Plan (PIP) was developed to clarify the goals Infrastructure and objectives for public outreach and engagement. Some study area communities, such as Hastings, South St. Paul, and West St. Paul, feature traditional street grid patterns with connected sidewalk systems. Other communities within the study area, such as Apple Valley, Burnsville, and Eagan, feature more suburban style street patterns that are supplemented with a fairly consistent network of shared-use trails, approximately one-mile apart along major thoroughfares. Interstate 35E, as well as Highway 52, MN-13, MN-77, MN-55 are key regional corridors that serve the study area. Metro Transit and the Minnesota Valley Transit Authority (MVTA) ES-2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EXECUTIVE The East-West Transit Study engaged Maximize regional transit connectivity stakeholders through communications Maximize transit ridership materials, public and stakeholder meetings, and committee workshops. Stakeholder input Respond to present and future travel helped determine corridor extents, was used patterns are supported by existing and to evaluate corridors, and influenced the planned land use corridor recommendations. Improve access to employment, institutions, and services Key themes identified multiple times in the engagement process included the desire Incorporate safe, convenient, and for transit service along County Road 42, a multimodal access and facilities direct connection to the METRO Blue Line, connections to colleges and other educational institutions, and existing transit service Corridor Evaluation modifications. The TAC identified the following corridors for assessment using the goals and measures Travel Demand Analysis developed in the evaluation framework: Evaluation of the travel demand potential for Butler Avenue (CSAH 4) east-west corridors in Dakota County was Wentworth Avenue (CSAH 8) performed using a variety of survey and GPS- based data sources in order to assess current MN-110 travel patterns within the study area. Lone Oak Road (CSAH 26) Using four distinct datasets based on current, Yankee
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Your Ticket Andy Gitzla! of Washington County 651-430-4338 Or by E-Mail to the Southeast Metro [email protected] Planning Future Stations
    RED ROCK PREPARING FOR THE FUTURE CORRIDOR The Red Rock Corridor has seen population growth at a rate more than twice the state’s average. In the next 20 years, the southeast suburbs of the COMMISSION metropolitan area are projected to add more than 100,000 new residents. is a Joint Powers Commission of the following county rail PART OF A SYSTEM The Red Rock Corridor connects the southeastern suburbs with the entire authorities, corridor communities Twin Cities metro. Originating in Hastings, the corridor spans through and stakeholders: downtown St. Paul and on to downtown Minneapolis. Dakota County With a stop at the Union Depot in St. Paul, the Red Rock Corridor will seamlessly connect with Metro Transit buses, taxis, intercity buses, Central Hennepin County Corridor LRT, high-speed passenger rail from Chicago, Amtrak’s Empire Ramsey County Builder and future connections to both the Gateway and Rush Line Corridors. At the Minneapolis Interchange Station, Red Rock will connect Washington County to buses, taxis, Southwest LRT, Hiawatha LRT, Northstar commuter rail and Goodhue County* other planned future transitways. Newport St. Paul Park Minneapolis Hastings CP Railway* 3-FOR-1 Cottage Grove INVESTMENT The proposed high-speed rail line St. Paul connecting the Twin Cities to Chicago Denmark Twp. will share tracks with the Red Rock Corridor. Improvements to track Red Wing* 1 FREIGHT capacity and safety upgrades, including Prairie Island Indian Community* 2 lights, crossing gates, and additional COMMUTER RAIL tracks for a 3-for-1 investment in the corridor. *Non-voting members 3 HIGH-SPEED RAIL WWW.REDROCKRAIL.ORG Contact: Your Ticket Andy Gitzla! of Washington County 651-430-4338 or by e-mail to the Southeast Metro [email protected] Planning future stations.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee
    Metropolitan Council Transportation Committee September 26, 2016 The Goal . Implementation Plan that Outlines: . Detailed technical elements . Service plan, stations, vehicles, etc. Station area plans . Schedule and costs of staged investments . Partner responsibilities through 2040 . Stakeholder buy-in and detailed resolutions of support 2 Implementation Plan – Committee Structure TAC B-CAC RRCC Technical Business and Red Rock Advisory Civic Advisory Corridor Committee Committee Commission Staff from MnDOT, the Staff and leaders from Staff and elected officials Metropolitan Council, Metro businesses and civic from the cities and counties Transit, and the cities and organizations along the along the corridor counties along the corridor corridor 3 Bus Rapid Transit Alignment 4 Potential BRT Phases . Frequency: 15 minutes (30 minutes 7pm-12am) . Span: 5am-12am . BRT station amenities . Potential Phases: 1. To Cottage Grove w/o Gateway Stations 2. Add Gateway Stations 3. To Hastings Depot 4. Add last two Hastings Stations Evaluation of BRT Phases Ridership In-Service Daily PPISH Year PPISH* Increase Hours Boardings Target Needed BRT Phase 1 2024 92 1,070 12 114% ≥25 (To Cottage Grove) 2040 92 1,240 14 85% BRT Phase 2 2024 96 1,550 16 55% (add Gateway ≥25 Stations) 2040 96 1,800 19 33% BRT Phase 3 2040 114 2,000 18 ≥25 43% (to Hastings) BRT Phase 4 (final 2040 135 2,200 16 ≥25 54% Hastings stations) Red Line 2040 73 4,700 65 ≥25 ----- *Passengers per In-Service Hour = daily boardings divided by in-service hours 6 Ridership Increase Needed to Meet Regional Target . BRT Phase 2 (to Cottage Grove with Gateway Stations) is the best performing option in 2040 .
    [Show full text]
  • Urban Freight Perspectives on Minnesota's Transportation System
    Urban Freight Perspectives on Minnesota’s Transportation System Metro District / Greater Twin Cities August 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Freight Perspectives for MnDOT . 2 Steps Toward Continuous Improvement Ideas for Freight Transportation . 3 Themes and Findings from Business Interviews . 4 FREIGHT PERSPECTIVES FOR MnDOT 7 Overview: MnDOT Manufacturers’ Perspectives Projects . 8 MnDOT Metro District Urban Freight Perspectives Study . 9 Businesses Interviewed . 12 STEPS TOWARD CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT FOR FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION 13 FINDINGS FROM INTERVIEWS WITH FREIGHT- RELATED BUSINESSES IN THE METRO DISTRICT 17 Congestion’s Impact on Shipping, Receiving and the Last Mile . 19 Congestion Management . 22 Construction. 25 Pavement Conditions. 28 Snow and Ice . 30 Interchanges . 32 Intersections. 33 Lanes . .35 Interstate 35E Weight and Speed Restrictions . 37 Signage . 38 Distracted Drivers . 40 Bike and Pedestrian Safety Issues and Infrastructure . 41 Truck Parking . 43 Policies: Hours of Service for Drivers and Weight Restrictions for Trucks . 44 Use of Rail and Other Non-Highway Freight Transportation . 45 MnDOT Communications and 511 . 46 Unauthorized Encampments . 49 PROFILES ON FREIGHT INDUSTRY ISSUES 51 Profile: Businesses Cite Drivers’ Shortage as an Issue . .5552 Profile: Some Freight-Related Businesses Face Issues From Gentrification and Mixed-use Settings in Urban Areas . .53 APPENDIX A: MORE ABOUT THE URBAN FREIGHT PERSPECTIVES STUDY AND RESEARCH METHODS 55 APPENDIX B: LIST OF BUSINESSES INTERVIEWED 61 APPENDIX C: LIST OF PROJECT TEAM, INTERVIEWERS, DATA COLLECTORS, AND PROJECT PARTNERS 65 APPENDIX D: INTERVIEW QUESTIONS 69 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FREIGHT PERSPECTIVES FOR MnDOT Manufacturers and other freight-related businesses are an important customer segment for the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) and a critical component of the economy for the state and the Twin Cities area.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Transportation Economic Development Program Report
    2016 Report on the Transportation Economic Development Program February 2017 Prepared by: The Minnesota Department of Transportation The Minnesota Department of Employment and 395 John Ireland Boulevard Economic Development Saint Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 332 Minnesota Street, Suite E200 Phone: 651-296-3000 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 Toll-Free: 1-800-657-3774 Phone: 651-259-7114 TTY, Voice or ASCII: 1-800-627-3529 Toll Free: 1-800-657-3858 TTY, 651-296-3900 To request this document in an alternative format, please call 651-366-4718 or 1-800-657-3774 (Greater Minnesota). You may also send an email to: [email protected]. On the cover: The cover image contains two photographs of Transportation Economic Development projects in various stages of development. From top: North Windom Industrial Park access from trunk highway 71; Bloomington I-494 and 34th Avenue diverging diamond interchange. Transportation Economic Development Program 2 Contents Contents............................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Legislative Request ............................................................................................................................................................. 5 Summary .............................................................................................................................................................................. 6 Ranking Process & Criteria ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study (Started in January 2000) That Would Evaluate the Constraints and Opportunities of Operating Commuter Rail Service in the Red Rock Corridor
    Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Executive Summary. E-1 1.0 Introduction . 1-1 1.1 Description of Red Rock Corridor . 1-1 1.2 Management . 1-2 1.3 Study Overview. 1-3 2.0 Public Involvement Program . 2-1 2.1 TAC and RRCC Meetings . 2-1 2.2 Open Houses. 2-1 2.3 Land Use Forum . 2-1 2.4 Station Area Planning Workshops . 2-2 2.5 Newsletters. 2-2 2.6 Web Site . 2-2 3.0 Purpose and Need . 3-1 3.1 Corridor Characteristics and Trends . 3-1 3.2 Project Need . 3-1 3.3 Goals, Objectives, and Criteria. 3-3 4.0 Alternatives Analysis . 4-1 4.1 Screening of Technology Options . 4-1 4.2 Summary of New FTA Rules for Major Capital Investments . 4-6 4.3 Definition of A Baseline Alternative . 4-8 4.4 Definition of a Build Alternative . 4-9 4.5 Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) Applications . 4-9 5.0 Station Area Planning . 5-1 5.1 Land Use Forum . 5-1 5.2 Station Area Planning Workshops . 5-2 6.0 Commuter Rail Service Plan . 6-1 6.1 Overview . 6-1 6.2 Initial Train Schedule Timetable . 6-4 6.3 Demand Forecast . 6-5 6.4 Rolling Stock . 6-6 6.5 Maintenance and Layover Facilities . 6-7 6.6 Capacity Improvements . 6-7 7.0 Financial Analysis . 7-1 7.1 Capital Costs . 7-1 7.2 Operating and Maintenance Costs . 7-3 7.3 Comparison to Other Rail Systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Freeway System 2008 Congestion Report
    Metropolitan Freeway System 2008 Congestion Report Minnesota Department of Transportation Metro District Office of Operations and Maintenance Regional Transportation Management Center March 2009 Table of Contents PURPOSE AND NEED....................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................1 METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................................2 2008 RESULTS ...............................................................................................................4 EXPLANATION OF CONGESTION GRAPH ...................................................................6 2008 METRO CONGESTION FREEWAY MAP: AM .......................................................9 2008 METRO CONGESTION FREEWAY MAP: PM .....................................................12 APPENDIX A: CENTERLINE HIGHWAY MILES MEASURED FOR CONGESTION ....15 APPENDIX B: MAP OF AREAS WITH SURVEILLANCE DETECTORS .......................18 APPENDIX C: CHANGE IN VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED ...........................................19 Metropolitan Freeway System 2008 Congestion Report Purpose and Need The Metropolitan Freeway System Congestion Report is prepared annually by the Regional Transportation Management Center (RTMC) to document those segments of the freeway system that experience recurring congestion. This report is prepared for these purposes: • Identification
    [Show full text]
  • November 15, 2017 the Honorable Paul
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp November 15, 2017 The Honorable Paul Torkelson, Chair The Honorable Scott Newman, Chair House Transportation Finance Committee Senate Transportation Finance & Policy Committee 381 State Office Building 3105 Minnesota Senate Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 Saint Paul, MN 55155 The Honorable Linda Runbeck, Chair The Honorable Scott Dibble House Transportation & Regional Governance Policy Ranking Minority Member Committee Senate Transportation Finance & Policy Committee 417 State Office Building 2213 Minnesota Senate Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 Saint Paul, MN 55155 The Honorable Frank Hornstein, DFL Lead The Honorable Connie Bernardy, DFL Lead House Transportation Policy & Finance Committee House Transportation & Regional Governance Policy 243 State Office Building Committee Saint Paul, MN 55155 253 State Office Building Saint Paul, MN 55155 RE: 2017 Guideway Status report Dear Legislators: The Minnesota Department of Transportation, in collaboration with the Metropolitan Council, is pleased to provide the 2017 Guideway Status report as required under 2016 Minnesota Statutes 174.93, subdivision 2. This report updates information for eight guideway corridors currently in operation, construction or design, and thirteen more that are in planning or analysis phase, or that were at the time of the last report in 2015. The capacity analysis looks at regional guideway funding needs and resources related to capital, operations and capital maintenance for the next ten years. If you have specific questions about this report or want additional information, please contact MnDOT’s Brian Isaacson at [email protected] or at 651 234-7783; or, you can contact Met Council’s Cole Hiniker at [email protected] or at 651 602-1748.
    [Show full text]
  • East Metro Rail Capacity Study October 2012
    EAST METRO RAIL CAPACITY STUDY OCTOBER 2012 PREPARED FOR: IN PARTNERSHIP WITH: PREPARED BY: East Metro Rail Capacity Study Prepared for Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority in partnership with Red Rock Corridor Commission By the Study Team of: TranSystems Corporation Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Rani Engineering The 106 Group Ltd. American Engineering Testing, Inc. LTK Engineering Services David Simpson Consultants HAD-Rail Consulting Services David Evans and Associates, Inc. Table of Contents Definitions Abbreviations EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................. ES-1 1.0 Study Background and Purpose .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Study Area .................................................................................................................................... 3 1.2 Project Partners ............................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 Scope of Study .............................................................................................................................. 6 2.0 Study Process ................................................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Project Development Process ....................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Study
    [Show full text]
  • 7. Transportation
    7. TRANSPORTATION Regional Context Metropolitan Council Goals The City of South St. Paul’s transportation system consists of a The Metropolitan Council has established the following goals within the 2040 combination of streets, highways, transit, and trails/sidewalks and Transportation Policy Plan. Making progress must be considered within the regional context with which it is towards these goals will address the connected. This regional context includes both Dakota County and the challenges of the City’s transportation Metropolitan Council. Both have established policies that affect South system, as well as improve the overall quality of life. St. Paul’s transportation goals and objectives. The City is active in the 1. Transportation System Stewardship: review of both of these agencies’ policies as they affect the City and its Sustainable investments in the transportation system. transportation system are protected by strategically preserving, maintaining, and operating system assets. 2. Safety and Security: The regional As mentioned in the Policy Plan, the city believes that developing transportation system is safe and and preserving a complete and connected network of local streets is secure for all users. essential in accomplishing: 3. Access to Destinations: People and businesses prosper by using a reliable, affordable, and efficient multimodal » Reduced trips through signalized intersections, reducing delay transportation system that connects » Reduced exposure to crashes in general them to destinations throughout the region and beyond. » Reduced need to access higher speed and higher volume roadways, 4. Competitive Economy: The regional thereby reducing the likelihood of injury crashes transportation system supports the economic competitiveness, vitality, and » Reduced trip lengths, travel times, and fuel usage prosperity of the region and state.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit - Keeping the Twin Cities Moving John Levin, Metro Transit Amy Vennewitz, Metropolitan Council
    Transit - Keeping the Twin Cities Moving John Levin, Metro Transit Amy Vennewitz, Metropolitan Council City Engineers Association of Minnesota Annual Meeting January 28, 2009 Overview • Where we are – Regional Transit Summary – Service Planning Basics – Park & Ride System • Where we are going – 2030 Transportation Policy Plan – Transitway Project Development & Progress – Transit Funding Outlook Regional Transit Summary • 94.6 million rides in 2008 Rail 11% Local Express – Up 6.5% over 2007 73% 14% ADA – Up 17.5% over 2005 Dial-a-ride Vanpool • Over 1,000 buses in 2% service in peak hour Regional Transit Service Service Planning Basics • Role of transit • Transit market areas • Sector study process • Park & Ride planning Reasons for Providing Transit • Provide mobility, travel options • Support efficient land use • Add capacity in congested corridors • Maximize public investment in transportation network Why People Use Transit Transit Trip Purpose • 80 percent of transit users are going to or from work or school What makes transit successful • Match transit service to demand – Density drives transit demand – Define regional market areas • Transit that serves customers – Cost savings: vehicle, fuel, parking – Travel time competitive – Convenient • Frequent service • Direct route Employment Count Employment Density Residential Count Residential Density Transit Market Areas • Market area reflects estimated demand for transit based on density of: – Total Population – Transit dependent population (Total population over 16 – number of cars) – Number of jobs • Determines level of service appropriate for a given area Transit Improvement Planning • Routine route maintenance • Sector Study approach • Short-term Service Improvement Plan • Transit Master Study and Transportation Policy Plan – Transitway network Sector Study Key Objectives • Simplify system • Faster service to major destinations • Improve connections & reliability – Enhanced timed transfers (esp.
    [Show full text]
  • I-494/TH 62 Mnpass Managed Lane Concept Development Scope of Work (Final Draft – 11/17/14)
    I-494/TH 62 MnPASS Managed Lane Concept Development Scope of Work (Final Draft – 11/17/14) BACKGROUND Interstate 494 and Trunk Highway 62 experience significant, recurring congestion during peak periods. The 2012 Average Annual Daily Traffic (AADT) volumes for I-494 between TH 62 and the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport range from 72,000 to 160,000 vehicles a day. The 2012 AADT volumes on TH 62 between I-494 and the MSP Airport range from 89,000 to 106,000 vehicles a day. The Metropolitan Freeway System 2013 Congestion Report shows congestion on I-494 and TH 62 ranging from under an hour to greater than three hours at certain locations in the morning and afternoon peak periods. In recent years, MnDOT, along with other governmental agencies, has conducted a variety of long and short-term planning activities that establish a general policy framework for future operation and condition of the I-494 and TH 62 corridors. These planning initiatives and studies include: • 2010 Metropolitan Council 2030 Transportation Policy Plan • 2010 Metropolitan Highway System Investment Study • MnPASS System Studies 1 (2005) and 2 (2010) • 2012 CMSP III Study • 2014 Minnesota State Highway Investment Plan • 2014 TH 77 Managed Lane Study • 2014 I35W-I494 Interchange Vision Layout • MAC Study of I-494/TH 5 Interchange OBJECTIVE The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) is requesting proposals to support MnDOT and its partners in the development and evaluation of MnPASS managed lane improvements, spot mobility improvements and other transit advantage improvements on the I- 494 and TH 62 corridors. The project area for the I-494 corridor segment is about 18 miles in length and includes the area between TH 62 on the west, to the MSP Airport on the east via TH 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Environmental Assessment
    BUS RAPID TRANSIT PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Environmental Assessment Appendix A Technical Report Purpose and Need September 2019 Purpose and Need Technical Report CONTENTS METRO Gold Line Bus Rapid Transit Project CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations ............................................................................................. 1-iii 1. Purpose and Need ........................................................................................................... 1-1 1.1. Project Description ............................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1.1. Project Location ........................................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1.2. Project Setting ........................................................................................................................... 1-3 1.1.3. Regional Transit System ........................................................................................................... 1-5 1.2. Project Background ........................................................................................................... 1-8 1.2.1. Policy Direction and Prior Planning ........................................................................................... 1-8 1.2.2. Environmental Review Process ................................................................................................ 1-9 1.3. Purpose and Need ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]