DOCSLIB.ORG

My Most Awsome Öresund

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
My Most Awsome Öresund Challenges and enablers of cross- border marine spatial planning and stakeholder involvement Experiences and perspectives from the Sound/Öresund Aalborg university, Copenhagen, 2020-02-20 Andrea Morf [email protected] Including slides created with colleagues from partners organisations within the BONUS projects BaltSpace and BASMATI and EU-DG MARE financed Baltic SCOPE & Pan Baltic Scope collaborations My most awsome Öresund J A collaboration of 5 Swedish universities to serve marine environmental management in Sweden www.havsmiljoinstitutet.se , www.havet.nu Andrea Morf: MSP, ICZM, participation, conflict mgmt. [email protected] / [email protected] Scientific coordinator and analyst (since 2009) Þ Analysis & synthesis: Research & reports! Þ Advice & Reviews: SOU, Natl. plans, Blue Plans (Blå ÖP) Þ Link research & mgmt: ICES WGMPCZM, Nordic MSP EXpert Network, MSP research network Þ Information & 3rd task. Research & development: BaltSeaPlan, BaltSpace. Teaching: lectures, course development, eXpert training Nordic Centre for regional development and planning Andrea Morf (Senior Research Fellow) • Skeppsholmen, Stockholm, http://www.nordregio.org/ • Nordic Council of Ministers, Nordic Collaboration: research & policy analysis • Social & economic sustainability, urban & rural development, green innovation, Arctic • Nordic & Baltic maps (statistics over years): http://www.nordregio.se/en/Maps/ & www.nordmap.se • Marine spatial planning since 2015: – http://www.balticscope.eu – https://bonusbasmati.eu – Nordregio News # 3 on MSP http://www.nordregio.se/en/Publications/Publications-2017/Nordregio- News-3-2017/ – State of the Nordic Region 2020 https://pub.norden.org/nord2020-001/#4 Overview 1. Shared problems in shared seas 2. MSP & ICZM: developing integrative practice 3. Integration challenges: Baltic Sea & Öresund 4. Enablers: evolving integrative practice linked with transdisciplinary R &D Source: http://maps.helcom.fi/website/mapservice/index.html 1. Shared problems in shared seas Challenges: intensifying use, uncertainty, plurality Source: http://maps.helcom.fi/website/mapservice/index.html Busy Baltic Sea & ØNarrow, intensively used Ø Shipping => increasing Øresund Ø Highly polluted => decreasing? Ø Power/telecom cables Ø Pipelines (Nordstream!) Ø Dump sites (weapons WW II) Ø Sand/gravel extraction Ø Fishing grounds, nursery areas Ø Sensitive nature, brackish/salt Ø MPAs (Marine Protected Areas) Ø IMO Particularly Sensitive Sea Area - PSSA ØNewcomers Ø Offshore-Wind Ø Aquaculture Ø Oil & gas extraction Ø Hydrocarbon sequestration © WWF Germany @ www.baltseaplan.eu Þ Complex cross-border issues Many Stakeholders Sharing Sea Space How get along & make it work…?!? Don’t forget the overall perspective on other users and drivers and pressures from land…! I really need to know the status of the eastern cod to run my model! 9 Drawings: © WWF Germany @ www.baltseaplan.eu 2. Developing field of practice Coastal & marine/time spatial planning • New field of governance practice • @ multiple institutional levels Not entirely new: but new aspects, levels, perspectives • “integration” • Fast development, accompanied by research • Baltic Sea = pioneering cross-border collaboration Source: http://maps.helcom.fi/website/mapservice/index.html Spatial planning Blue Growth ó ecological sustainability? Public process ó Political ó Expert driven? © WWF Germany @ www.baltseaplan.eu Spatial planning: plan + process © WWF Germany @ www.baltseaplan.eu …on a map, shippingPlanning & wind powercontent might look like this… Blue-Green Growth Balancing Sustainability Pillars What sets the boundaries? ! => Different views! Economy Environment Society Society Enviro Econ nment omy 14 EU-MSP Framework Directive Proposal for MSP/ICM COM(2013) 133 final Directive 2014/89/EU establisHing a framework for maritime spatial planning EU: Maritime Spatial Planning in Member States => whip & carrot! Until 2021 Appointed authority Marine Spatial Plans Aligned transnationally EU MSP Directive © WWF Germany @ www.baltseaplan.eu Governing the Baltic Sea Complex problems => Challenges => Integration…? Ø Watershed > 90 million inhabitants Ø Many X-border activities & interests Ø Strong sector planning/management Ø Various +/- integrated EU policies Differences • 9 countries, 1 autonomous territory: 9+ official languages • Priorities: protect ó use now/future? • Border conflicts (Grey Zones) • Administrative & planning traditions, levels and boundaries • Different sectors at different government levels • Spatial and admin. overlaps • Varying status of integrative mgmt. Ø But: pioneering institutional development & collaboration compared to other marine basins © WWF Germany @ www.baltseaplan.eu Many MSP Projects in the Baltic Sea Region Financed by: INTERREG, EU-EASME, BONUS, HORIZON2020 Skagerrak/Kattegat: e.g. Sea Meets Land.. 2006 2008 2009 2012 2015 2017 2019 Red: AM @HMI BaltSpace - Towards Sustainable Bold line: AM @Nordregio Governance of Baltic Marine Space MSP Planning Status 2019 spring SCOPING & ANALYSIS ORGANISATION OF KNOWLEDGE PROCESS Lithuania ROAD MAP Germany: EEZ VISION OR OTHER Germany: STRATEGY Schleswig-Holstein DOCUMENTS Germany: PROBLEMS, Mecklenburg- NEEDS & IDEAS Vorpommern MONITORING & EARLY DRAFT PLANS EVALUATION Latvia 1ST DRAFT PLANS Sweden Poland 2ND DRAFT PLANS Denmark Estonia FINAL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION Finland ADOPTED Åland Source: Morf et al. 2019. adapted, special thanks to Holger Janßen 3. Challenges: Multidimensional integration across Öresund & Baltic Sea in general • Research (applied, practice relevant) Towards sustainable governance of Baltic marine space 2015 – 2018 • Development (& problem based learning) Towards better alignment of MSP in the Baltic Sea Region Source: http://maps.helcom.fi/website/mapservice/index.html 3.1 Cross-border collaboration to develop MSP in the BSR Authority driven projects Development & Research: Observation & reflective practice in Baltic SCOPE & Pan Baltic Scope Source: http://maps.helcom.fi/website/mapservice/index.html Development Project 1st project bringing 2015-17 1st step together manDateD national MSP Ø Implement EU Directive authorities to Ø Aim: closer alignment of national plans collaborate in transbounDary Ø Platform for knowledge-sharing, -creation MSP, with the aim and communication to iDentify cross- Ø 2-way knowledge building and learning border issues and Ø Transboundary à National solutions Ø National à Transboundary Focus on Ø Partners: Authorities responsible for MSP national level & (those interested), Regional organisations topics relevant (HELCOM, VASAB), Research institutes for all countries (Nordregio, SYKE) in the outer EEZ Ø 2 Cases: Southwest Baltic (& sub-areas) & Central Baltic …translating territorial governance approach into project partner perspectives… Cross-sector integration & synergies = Energy, environment, fisheries & Coordination & collaboration shipping of institutional actors = Working together, coordinating, collaborating etc. Stakeholder participation & engagement = (institutional) stakeholders in international & national events Maritime specificities & jurisdictional boundaries = Differences in planning systems, multi-level governance, regulatory systems etc. Source: Maritime Institute in Gdańsk (prepared by Joanna Pardus). Case studies based on planning status, place specific needs! 2 different complementary approaches – Reports see www.balticscope.eu Central Baltic case South West Baltic case Overarching: Area specific: Ø Overall perspective Ø Focus on sub-areas with cross- Ø Process-focus sectoral and cross-border Ø Identification of synergies and issues conflicts between sectors Ø Development of a conflict Ø Ecosystem-Based Approach matrix per area applied in tri- Task Force and bilateral meetings; Ø Combining maps & mapping Ø Mapping exercise exercise Ø Shipping guidelines See: Giacometti et al. 2017 See: Urtane et al. 2017 -19 2nd step 2018 Development Project 2018-19 200 7 Towards better alignment of MSP in the Baltic Sea Region 26 Case studies: e.g. Finland- Åland- Sweden Reports, see: www.panbalticscope.eu FIAXSE-Storymap, see: Map: Johanna Jokinen & Julien Grunefeld, Nordregio 27 https://arcg.is/1mfmDD Graphs: Project partners: AX Landscape Govt, Finnish MSP Cooperation, SwAM 3.2 Developing MSP in the BSR Mapping the challenges & enablers • Research & Development BONUS BaltSpace: Cross border & cross level integration in the Öresund as in 2016-8 www.baltspace.eu Source map: http://maps.helcom.fi/website/mapservice/index.html Approach to study integration in MSP Cross-border & Policy & sector Stakeholder Knowledge transboundary In-depth case studies • Baltic-wide – • Key challenges in different VASAB/HELCOM WG situations? • Öresund/Øresund • Lithuania & Latvia • Enabling conditions? • Mecklenburg- comparison/cross- Vorpommern vs. border German EEZ • Implications for sustainable • Sector integration (fisheries) in Poland use and good environmental status? Analysis of MSP Integration Challenges Sound Case Öresund/Øresund – Intensively used strait between Sweden & Denmark – Attractive for residents, users & visitors – History of locally driven cross-border collaboration (Hlsb-Hlsø/Malmö-CPH) – On-going national/local MSP www.msp-platform.eu www.havochvatten.se BaltSpace Case Study: The Sound Perspective • Past: wind power & sand extraction • Present: observe on-going MSP- processes spring 2016 - spring 17 • Identify integration challenges and enablers for all dimensions Sources & methods • Documents • 26 semi-structured
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Accessibility of the Baltic Sea Region Past and Future Dynamics Research Report
    Accessibility of the Baltic Sea Region Past and future dynamics Research report This report has been written by Spiekermann & Wegener Urban and Regional Research on the behalf of VASAB Secretariat at Latvian State Regional Development Agency Final Report, November 2018 Authors Tomasz Komornicki, Klaus Spiekermann Spiekermann & Wegener Urban and Regional Research Lindemannstraße 10 D-44137 Dortmund, Germany 2 Contents Page 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 2 Accessibility potential in the BSR 2006-2016 ........................................................................... 5 2.1 The context of past accessibility changes ........................................................................... 5 2.2 Accessibility potential by road ........................................................................................... 13 2.3 Accessibility potential by rail .............................................................................................. 17 2.4 Accessibility potential by air .............................................................................................. 21 2.5 Accessibility potential, multimodal ..................................................................................... 24 3. Accessibility to opportunities ................................................................................................... 28 3.1 Accessibility to regional centres .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Three Seas Initiative
    Updated April 26, 2021 The Three Seas Initiative The Three Seas Initiative (3SI) is a regional effort in According to EU data, the 3SI region remains less well-off Europe to expand cross-border energy, transportation, and economically compared with the rest of the EU; the 3SI digital infrastructure and boost economic development in countries together comprise just under 30% of EU territory the area between the Adriatic Sea, Baltic Sea, and Black and 22% of its population but account for 10% of the EU’s Sea. Twelve countries (Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, the gross domestic product (the EU data predate Brexit and so Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, include the United Kingdom). Infrastructure gaps are Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Slovenia), all of which are considered a factor behind regional economic disparities. members of the European Union (EU), participate in the According to EU data, road and rail travel in the 3SI region 3SI (see Figure 1). take, on average, roughly two to four times longer than comparable travel in the rest of the EU. The U.S. government, including some Members of Congress, have indicated strong backing for the 3SI. In Figure 1. Three Seas Initiative November 2020, the House of Representatives passed a bipartisan resolution “expressing support of the Three Seas Initiative in its efforts to increase energy independence and infrastructure connectivity thereby strengthening the United States and European national security” (H.Res. 672, 116th Congress). Officials from the Biden Administration and the Trump Administration have expressed diplomatic support for the 3SI, and high-level U.S. officials (including then- President Trump in 2017) have joined its annual summits.
    [Show full text]
  • The Baltic Sea Region the Baltic Sea Region
    TTHEHE BBALALTTICIC SSEAEA RREGIONEGION Cultures,Cultures, Politics,Politics, SocietiesSocieties EditorEditor WitoldWitold MaciejewskiMaciejewski A Baltic University Publication A chronology of the history 7 of the Baltic Sea region Kristian Gerner 800-1250 Vikings; Early state formation and Christianization 800s-1000s Nordic Vikings dominate the Baltic Region 919-1024 The Saxon German Empire 966 Poland becomes Christianized under Mieszko I 988 Kiev Rus adopts Christianity 990s-1000s Denmark Christianized 999 The oldest record on existence of Gdańsk Cities and towns During the Middle Ages cities were small but they grew in number between 1200-1400 with increased trade, often in close proximity to feudal lords and bishops. Lübeck had some 20,000 inhabitants in the 14th and 15th centuries. In many cities around the Baltic Sea, German merchants became very influential. In Swedish cities tensions between Germans and Swedes were common. 1000s Sweden Christianized 1000s-1100s Finland Christianized. Swedish domination established 1025 Boleslaw I crowned King of Poland 1103-1104 A Nordic archbishopric founded in Lund 1143 Lübeck founded (rebuilt 1159 after a fire) 1150s-1220s Denmark dominates the Baltic Region 1161 Visby becomes a “free port” and develops into an important trade center 1100s Copenhagen founded (town charter 1254) 1100s-1200s German movement to the East 1200s Livonia under domination of the Teutonic Order 1200s Estonia and Livonia Christianized 1201 Riga founded by German bishop Albert 1219 Reval/Tallinn founded by Danes ca 1250
    [Show full text]
  • Eastern Gulf of Finland-1
    Template for Submission of Information, including Traditional Knowledge, to Describe Areas Meeting Scientific Criteria for Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas EASTERN GULF OF FINLAND Abstract The area is a shallow (mean 24 m, max 95 m deep) archipelago area in the northeastern Baltic Sea. It is characterized by hundreds of small islands and skerries, coastal lagoons and boreal narrow inlets, as well as a specific geomorphology, with clear signs from the last glaciation. Due to the low salinity (0- 5 permille), the species composition is a mixture of freshwater and marine organisms, and especially diversity of aquatic plants is high, Many marine species, including habitat forming key species such as bladderwrack (Fucus vesiculosus) and blue mussel (Mytilus trossulus), live on the edge of their geographical distribution limits, which makes them vulnerable to human disturbance and effects of climate change. The area has a rich birdlife and supports one of the most important populations of the ringed seal (Pusa hispida botnica), an endangered species. Introduction to the area The proposed area (Fig. 1 & 2) is situated on the north-eastern part of the Gulf of Finland, in the Baltic Sea, which is the largest brackish water area in the World. The proposed area is an archipelago with hundreds of small islands and skerries, coastal lagoons and boreal narrow inlets, as well as a specific geomorphology, with clear signs from the last glaciation (ca. 18.000 – 9.000 BP). Coastal areas freeze over still freeze over every winter for at least a few weeks. The scenery in the area ranges from sheltered inner archipelago with lagoons, shallow bays and boreal inlets, through middle archipelago, with few larger islands, to wave exposed outer archipelago with open sea, small islands and skerries.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction
    UNCLASSIFIED/UNLIMITED 1. Introduction he coastal and shelf zones of the Black Sea are a mosaic of complex, interacting ecosystems with immense economic significance, rich natural resources and ecological communities, T and concentrated human activities. They contain biologically productive, diverse ecosystems that provide a vital habitat for many commercial and endangered species. Until recently, the Black Sea supported fisheries almost five times richer than those of the neighboring Mediterranean. The Black Sea is of global interest on several levels. First, it has experienced the worst envi- ronmental degradation of all of the world’s oceans. The situation has become so severe that it has affected the health, well being, and standard of living of the people in the immediate area. Second, most of the six coastal countries—Bulgaria, Georgia, Romania, Russia, Turkey, and Ukraine—have unstable or collapsed economies. About 160 million people live in the Black Sea catchment basin, including 80 million only in the Danube River basin. Although international agreements, strategic plans, and national environmental programs are in place, these severe economical problems have significantly slowed environmental monitoring, remediation, and restoration efforts. The maps in Figure 1 show the geographical location of the Black Sea region, its six coastal countries, and its catchment basin. The Black Sea’s surface area is 423,000 km2, one-fifth that of the Mediterranean, its total volume is 547,000 km3, and its maximum depth is around 2,200 m. The northwestern shelf, less than 200 m deep and occupying ~25% of the total area, receives discharges of Europe’s three largest rivers, the Danube, Dniepr, and Don, and also the Dniestr and Kuban rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • 20020011.Pdf
    Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen 1144 PERSPECTIVE Geological and evolutionary underpinnings for the success of Ponto-Caspian species invasions in the Baltic Sea and North American Great Lakes David F. Reid and Marina I. Orlova1 Abstract: Between 1985 and 2000, ~70% of new species that invaded the North American Great Lakes were endemic to the Ponto-Caspian (Caspian, Azov, and Black seas) basins of eastern Europe. Sixteen Ponto-Caspian species were also established in the Baltic Sea as of 2000. Many Ponto-Caspian endemic species are characterized by wide environmental tolerances and high phenotypic variability. Ponto-Caspian fauna evolved over millions of years in a series of large lakes and seas with widely varying salinities and water levels and alternating periods of isolation and open connections between the Caspian Sea and Black Sea depressions and between these basins and the Mediterranean Basin and the World Ocean. These conditions probably resulted in selection of Ponto-Caspian endemic species for the broad environmental tolerances and euryhalinity many exhibit. Both the Baltic Sea and the Great Lakes are geologi- cally young and present much lower levels of endemism. The high tolerance of Ponto-Caspian fauna to varying environmental conditions, their ability to survive exposure to a range of salinities, and the similarity in environmental conditions available in the Baltic Sea and Great Lakes probably contribute to the invasion success of these species. Human activities have dramatically increased the opportunities for transport and introduction and have played a cata- lytic role. Résumé : Entre 1985 et 2000, environ 70 % des espèces qui ont envahi pour la première fois les Grands-Lacs d’Amérique du Nord étaient endémiques aux bassins versants de la région pontocaspienne de l’Europe de l’Est, soit ceux de la mer Caspienne, de la mer d’Azov et de la mer Noire.
    [Show full text]
  • Eu Baltic Sea Strategy
    EU BALTIC SEA STRATEGY REPORT FOR THE KONRAD-ADENAUER-STIFTUNG LONDON OFFICE www.kas.de This paper includes résumés and experts views from conferences and seminars facilitated and organised by the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung London and Centrum Balticum. Impressum © Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung 2009 All rights reserved. No part of this report may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronical or mechanical, without permission in writing from Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung, London office, 63D Eccleston Square, London SW1V 1PH. ABBREVIATIONS AC Arctic Council AEPS Arctic Environmental Protection Strategy ALDE Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe BaltMet Baltic Metropoles BCCA Baltic Sea Chambers of Commerce Association BDF Baltic Development Forum BEAC Barents Euro-Arctic Council BEAR Council of the Barents Euro-Arctic Region BENELUX Economic Union of Belgium, The Netherlands and Luxembourg BFTA The Baltic Free Trade Area BSCE Black Sea Economic Cooperation Pact BSPC The Baltic Sea Parliamentary Conference BSR Baltic Sea Region BSSSC Baltic Sea States Subregional Cooperation CBSS The Council for Baltic Sea States CFSP Common Foreign and Security Policy CEFTA Central European Free Trade Agreement CIS The Commonwealth of Independent States COMECON Council for Mutual Economic Assistance CPMR Conference of Peripheral Maritime Regions of Europe EBRD European Bank for Reconstruction and Development EEA European Economic Area EEC European Economic Community EFTA European Free Trade Agreement EGP European Green Party ENP European
    [Show full text]
  • Baltic Sea Ice Seasons in the Twentieth Century
    CLIMATE RESEARCH Vol. 25: 217–227, 2004 Published January 23 Clim Res Baltic Sea ice seasons in the twentieth century S. Jevrejeva1,*, V. V. Drabkin2, J. Kostjukov3, A. A. Lebedev2, M. Leppäranta4, Ye. U. Mironov2, N. Schmelzer 5, M. Sztobryn6 1Proudman Oceanographic Laboratory, Bidston Observatory, Birkenhead CH43 7RA, UK 2Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute, 38 Bering Str., St. Petersburg 199397, Russia 3Latvian Hydrometeorological Agency, 165 Maskavas Str., Riga, Latvia 4University of Helsinki, Division of Geophysics, PO Box 64, 00014 Helsinki, Finland 5 Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie, Neptunallee 5, 18057 Rostock, Germany 6 Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Waszyngtona 42, Gdynia, Poland ABSTRACT: We examine the evolution of ice seasons in the Baltic Sea during the 20th century based on a set of 37 time series from the coastal observation stations. The statistical question of combining data from sites with different ice probabilities is solved by using fractiles of the distributions. These 100 yr long time series, including date of freezing, ice break-up, number of days with ice, and maxi- mum annual ice thickness, provide evidence of a general trend toward easier ice conditions; the largest change is in the length of ice season, which is decreasing by 14 to 44 d per century. The trends of a reduction of about 8 to 20 d per century to earliest ice break-up are in a good agreement with a warming trend in winter air temperature over Europe. A statistically significant decreasing trend in probability of ice occurrence in the southern part of the Baltic Sea was detected; however, there is no change in probability of ice occurrence in the northern part.
    [Show full text]
  • The Northern Bothnian Bay
    Template for Submission of Scientific Information to Describe Areas Meeting Scientific Criteria for Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas THE NORTHERN BOTHNIAN BAY Abstract The Bothnian Bay forms the northernmost part of the Baltic Sea. It is the most brackish part of the Baltic, greatly affected by the combined river discharge from most of the Finnish and Swedish Lapland. The sea area is shallow and the seabed consists mostly of sand. The area displays arctic conditions: in winter the whole area is covered with sea ice, which is important for the reproduction of the grey seal (Haliochoerus grypus) and a prerequisite nesting habitat for the ringed seal (Pusa hispida botnica). In summer the area is productive and due to the turbidity of the water the primary production is compressed to a narrow photic zone (between 1 to 5 meters). Due to the extreme brackish water the number of marine species is low, but at the same time the number of endemic and threatened species is high. It is an important reproduction area for coastal fish and an important gathering area for several anadromous fish species. River Tornionjoki, which discharges into the northern part of the area, is the most important spawning river for the Baltic population of the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar), a vulnerable species in the Baltic Sea. Introduction The Northern Bothnian Bay is a large, shallow and tideless sea area with a seabed consisting mostly of sand and silt, forming the northernmost part of the Baltic Sea. The topography is a result of the last glaciation (10,000 BP) and the isostatic land uplift is still ongoing (ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltics Left of Bang: the Role of NATO with Partners in Denial-Based Deterrence
    November 2019 STRATEGIC FORUM National Defense University About the Authors Colonel Robert M. Klein, USA (Ret.), Baltics Left of Bang: The Role was a Senior Military Fellow in the Center for Strategic Research (CSR), of NATO with Partners in Institute for National Strategic Studies, at the National Defense University. Lieutenant Commander Stefan Denial-Based Deterrence Lundqvist, Ph.D., is a Researcher and Faculty Board Member at the Swedish Defence University (SEDU). Colonel Ed By Robert M. Klein, Stefan Lundqvist, Ed Sumangil, Sumangil, USAF, is a Senior Military and Ulrica Pettersson Fellow in CSR. Ulrica Pettersson, Ph.D., is assigned to SEDU and is an Adjunct Faculty Member at Joint Special his paper is the first in a sequence of INSS Strategic Forums dedicated Operations University. to multinational exploration of the strategic and defense challenges Key Points faced by Baltic states in close proximity to a resurgent Russia that ◆◆ The North Atlantic Treaty Organi- the U.S. National Security Strategy describes as “using subversive measures to zation’s military contribution to T weaken the credibility of America’s commitment to Europe, undermine transat- deter Russian aggression in the 1 Baltic region should begin with lantic unity, and weaken European institutions and governments.” The Ameri- an overall strategic concept that can and European authors of this paper, along with many others, came together seamlessly transitions from deter- rence through countering Russia’s in late 2017 to begin exploration of the most significant Baltic states security gray zone activities and onto con- challenges through focused strategic research and a series of multinational, in- ventional war, only if necessary.
    [Show full text]
  • North Sea – Baltic Core Network Corridor Study
    North Sea – Baltic Core Network Corridor Study Final Report December 2014 TransportTransportll North Sea – Baltic Final Report Mandatory disclaimer The information and views set out in this Final Report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission's behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. December 2014 !! The!Study!of!the!North!Sea!/!Baltic!Core!Network!Corridor,!Final!Report! ! ! December!2014! Final&Report& ! of!the!PROXIMARE!Consortium!to!the!European!Commission!on!the! ! The$Study$of$the$North$Sea$–$Baltic$ Core$Network$Corridor$ ! Prepared!and!written!by!Proximare:! •!Triniti!! •!Malla!Paajanen!Consulting!! •!Norton!Rose!Fulbright!LLP! •!Goudappel!Coffeng! •!IPG!Infrastruktur/!und!Projektentwicklungsgesellschaft!mbH! With!input!by!the!following!subcontractors:! •!University!of!Turku,!Brahea!Centre! •!Tallinn!University,!Estonian!Institute!for!Future!Studies! •!STS/Consulting! •!Nacionalinių!projektų!rengimas!(NPR)! •ILiM! •!MINT! Proximare!wishes!to!thank!the!representatives!of!the!European!Commission!and!the!Member! States!for!their!positive!approach!and!cooperation!in!the!preparation!of!this!Progress!Report! as!well!as!the!Consortium’s!Associate!Partners,!subcontractors!and!other!organizations!that! have!been!contacted!in!the!course!of!the!Study.! The!information!and!views!set!out!in!this!Final!Report!are!those!of!the!authors!and!do!not!
    [Show full text]
  • Xenodiversity of the European Brackish Water Seas: the North American Contribution
    2000. In: Pederson, J. (ed) Marine Bioinvasions. Proceedings of the First National Conference, January 24-27, 1999 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. pp. 107-119 Xenodiversity of the European Brackish Water Seas: the North American Contribution Erkki Leppäkoski Department of Biology, Åbo Akademi University, FIN-20500 Turku, Finland Sergej Olenin Coastal Research and Planning Institute, Klaipeda University, Manto 84, LT-5808 Klaipeda, Lithuania Abstract The biological diversity of the European brackish water seas, either enclosed (Baltic and Black) or iso- lated from the world ocean (Caspian and Aral), is by far lower than that of the fully marine water bodies. The ecosystem may consist of only a few components, so that only one or two species represent a functi- onal group. Any new species added quite often means major changes in the structure and functioning of the whole system. The European brackish water seas presently contain a lot of "foreign" biological diver- sity. We define this as xenodiversity (Gr. xenos - strange) to indicate structural and functional diversity caused by nonindigenous species (NIS). Until now, 112 species have been included in a Baltic and Black Sea NIS Database. Of these, 91 species are known from the Baltic, 35 from the Black Sea, and of them 16 NIS of non-European origin are common for both seas. The Atlantic coast of North America has ex- ported more species to Europe than any other donor area due to the successive opening of routes of com- merce in the post-Columbian era. At present, there are 33 known NIS of American origin in European brackish-water seas; only 14 of them have been intentionally introduced.
    [Show full text]