DOCSLIB.ORG

The Castle Site

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Geophysics at Castle Cary The Castle Site Authors John Oswin Bath and Camerton Archaeological Society and Matthew Charlton June 2011 Geophysics at Castle Cary The Castle Site © Bath and Camerton Archaeological Society April 2011 Abstract A geophysical survey was undertaken by the Bath and Camerton Archaeological Society during March and April 2011, which encompassed the castle site at Castle Cary, Somerset. This report concentrates on the castle site. Others will describe work at Manor Farm and Dimmer. The site was surveyed using fluxgate gradiometry and twin-probe resistance. Resistivity profiling and ground-penetrating radar also augmented the survey. The inner and outer baileys were surveyed on separate grids, but these could be related to each other to a good approximation. Areas of Manor Farm which came within the scheduled area, were also on separate grids. Twin-probe resistance was the more successful method, and this revealed massive masonry structures within the inner bailey. The outer bailey appeared to contain a rectangular structure contained within a curtain wall which did not correspond to the standing earthen ramparts. i Acknowledgements Sincere thanks go to Mr John Churchouse of Manor Farm for all his support and in providing permission and access to his land. Special thanks go to Somerset County Archaeologist Bob Croft and Rob Iles of English Heritage for their continued support as well as the granting of a Section 42 license to undertake the geophysical survey. Thanks also go to the Bath and Camerton Archaeological Society volunteers led by Dr John Oswin and Owen Dicker, as well as those members of the Castle Cary Museum and the local community who took part in the survey over the three day period. Graphics were kindly produced by Keith Turner and Google Earth. This project was made possible by funding from the Heritage Lottery Fund. ii Table of Contents Abstract 1. Introduction 1 2. Equipment used 4 3. Survey results 8 4. Discussion 16 Appendix A 19 Bibliography 21 Additional observation by Mark Corney iii List of Figures 1.1 Showing the location of the town centred at ST640322 1.2 Showing the scheduled area 2.1 Bartington 601-2 twin fluxgate gradiometer 2.2 Twin-probe resistance meter 2.3 The TR/CIA resistance meter 2.4 Ground-penetrating radar 3.1 Magnetometer results - survey of the inner and outer bailey 3.2 Resitivity Results- survey of the inner and outer bailey 3.3 Resitivity Results Manor Farm 3.4 Placing of these profiles with respect to the resistance grids and features. 3.5 Profile 1 3.6 Profiled 2 and 3 3.7 Profile 45 3.8 Profile 67 3.9. Start of grid - GPR 3.10 End of grid - GPR 3.11 Between Manor Farm (left) and inner bailey (right) 4.1 Resistance plots and radar strip laid out. 4.2 Showing the plan marked up. Appendix A Grid and survey data A.1 Grid data for the castle site magnetometer survey A.2 Grid data for the manor farm magnetometer survey A.3 Castle site twin-probe resistance grid A.4 Shows the Manor Farm site twin-probe resistance grid iv 1 Introductory 1.1 Location and topography Location Castle Cary is a small town in south-east Somerset, lying within the Jurassic belt of geology, approximately at the junction of the upper lias and the inferior and upper oolites. Building stone is plentiful, and is orange to yellow in colour. This is the source of the River Cary, which now runs to the Bristol Channel via King’s Sedgemoor Drain and the River Parrett, but prior to 1793 petered out within Sedgemoor. The town is centred at ST640322. A location map is shown in figure 1.1. Figure 1.1 showing the location of the town centred at ST640322 Topography The site occupies a natural spur formed by two conjoining irregularly shaped mounds extending from the north east to the south west. The ground gradually rises to the north and, more steeply, to the east, and falls away to the south. The outer bailey is situated on the larger mound which is located on the north side of the inner bailey. The outer bailey is defined on the north side by a low broad bank with a shallow external ditch. The east side is enclosed by a central ditch flanked on both sides by 1 parallel banks between 2.5m and 7m high above the base of the ditch, with an overall width of approximately 42m. The banks form a curve at the south east corner of the outer bailey at its junction with the north east corner of the inner bailey. The east side of the inner bailey is enclosed by a ditch with an inner bank approximately 12m wide and an outer bank approximately 5m wide. The south side of the inner bailey drops steeply down to Park Pond, a wide marshy area which is fed by springs and is the source of the River Cary. Modern development now defines the western side of the castle site and an evaluation in 1998, prior to its construction, revealed a continuous ditch of between 10m and 12m wide, which enclosed the inner and outer baileys. 1.2 Background The site is a Medieval Motte and Bailey castle occupying a natural spur overlooking the source of the River Cary. It has been suggest that the first phase of the castle was an earlier ringwork which was built not long after the Norman Conquest (Leach & Ellis 2010). The positioning of the castle may also have tied into an existing Romano- British or Saxon site, as a common location for the building of these castles was to utilise earlier phases of defence (Creighton and Higham 2003). Excavations by Leach and Ellis on Manor farm between 1999-2001 discovered a primary phase of Roman-British activity and the discovery of a lime-burning kiln, 150 sherds of Romano-British pottery, as well as a finely modelled bronze figurine of a lar which may have come from a nearby villa site (Leach 2010). It was thought that after the second siege in 1153, the castle was demolished as a result of the destruction on baronial strongholds following the uprising, and some of the stone used in the construction of the new manorial centre immediately to the west, overlaying the former castle ditch. The new practicable position of the manorial site may also have been more accessible and easily integrated with the new urban development (Prior 2004). The foundations of the Norman keep were excavated in the 1890’s, and it was suggested that the lower mound had been built up after the construction of the Keep in the late 11th or early 12th century, and remained in use until around 1153. The castle was besieged by King Stephen in 1138, and again in 1153. The earliest visible remains at Castle Cary are those of the Castle and its constituent earthworks (SMR 53640), sited to the east of the town. Excavations in the area of Manor Farm (SMR 11632, 11639, 11640) located further baileys of the castle suggesting that the inner and outer baileys were of one phase. A section of the ditches showed evidence of what appeared to have been deliberate backfilling, possibly as early as the 12th century. One of these ditches was later re-dug to provide one side of a moat around the later Manor House (SMR 11641). It was thought that after the 2 second siege in 1153, the castle was possibly demolished as a result of the destruction of baronial strongholds following the uprising, and some of the stone was used in the construction of the new manorial centre immediately to the west, overlaying the former castle ditch. In March 2011 a license was obtained from English Heritage to undertake a geophysical survey on the scheduled monument (no. 33722) at Castle Cary in South Somerset (see figure 1.2). The survey was carried out under licence from English Heritage (case no. SL00001078) and with permission from the local landowner, Mr John Churchouse. The survey was carried out on behalf of Castle Cary museum by the Bath & Camerton Archaeological Society under the nominated representatives Dr John Oswin and Matthew Charlton and took place over a three day period with participation from Castle Cary museum, as well as members of the local community. The geophysical survey formed part of a wider project concerned with improving interpretation of historic sites in and around Castle Cary. 1.3 Dates of Survey The survey was conducted in two sessions. The first was three days, Monday to Wednesday 28th to 30th March 2011. The second session was on Monday and Tuesday, 11th and 12th of April. 1.4 Personnel The project was organised by Matthew Charlton of Enthuseit Ltd on behalf of Castle Cary Museum. The Geophysical survey was undertaken by BACAS volunteers led by John Oswin and Owen Dicker. Assistance was given by members of the Castle Cary Museum including, Anne Brittain (Chairperson), Annette Bedford (Secretary), Anne Webster (Treasurer) and Paul Clothier (Collections). Members of the local community also contributed towards the survey. Graphics were kindly produced by BACAS member Keith Turner. 1.5 Scope of this report This report concentrates on survey work within the scheduled area of the castle site. Details from the survey at Manor Farm within the scheduled area will be included, 3 and any information from the unscheduled area will be mentioned if it is relevant to understanding the site. The education activities planned within the survey will not be included in this document. This document will not report on work at Manor Farm beyond the scheduled area or on work at Dimmer.
Recommended publications
  • Our Castle, Our Town

    Our Castle, Our Town

    Our Castle, Our Town An n 2011 BACAS took part in a community project undertaken by Castle Cary investigation Museum with the purpose of exploring a selection of historic sites in and around into the the town of Castle Cary. archaeology of I Castle Cary's Using a number of non intrusive surveying methods including geophysical survey Castle site and aerial photography, the aim of the project was to develop the interpretation of some of the town’s historic sites, including the town’s castle site. A geophysical Matthew survey was undertaken at three sites, including the Castle site, the later manorial Charlton site, and a small survey 2 km south west of Castle Cary, at Dimmer. The focus of the article will be the main castle site centred in the town (see Figure 1) which will provide a brief history of the site, followed by the results of the survey and subsequent interpretation. Location and Topography Castle Cary is a small town in south east Somerset, lying within the Jurassic belt of geology, approximately at the junction of the upper lias and the inferior and upper oolites. Building stone is plentiful, and is orange to yellow in colour. This is the source of the River Cary, which now runs to the Bristol Channel via King’s Sedgemoor Drain and the River Parrett, but prior to 1793 petered out within Sedgemoor. The site occupies a natural spur formed by two conjoining, irregularly shaped mounds extending from the north east to the south west. The ground gradually rises to the north and, more steeply, to the east, and falls away to the south.
  • Conservation of Architectural Ancient Monuments in Scotland Guidance on Principles

    Conservation of Architectural Ancient Monuments in Scotland Guidance on Principles

    CONSERVING THE UNDERWATER HERITAGE HERITAGE POLICY ..Safeguarding the Built Heritage The Conservation of Architectural Ancient Monuments in Scotland Guidance on Principles Richard Fawcett i THE CONSERVATION OF ARCHITECTURAL ANCIENT MONUMENTS IN SCOTLAND The Conservation of Architectural Ancient Monuments in Scotland Guidance on Principles Published by Historic Scotland Longmore House Salisbury Place Edinburgh EH9 1SH © Historic Scotland 2001 ISBN ii THE CONSERVATION OF ARCHITECTURAL ANCIENT MONUMENTS IN SCOTLAND CONTENTS Foreword page 1 Acknowledgements page 2 1. Introduction page 3 2. General principles of conservation page 7 3. Treatment of masonry walls page 10 4. Treatment of carved and moulded stonework page 20 5. Treatment of mortar page 25 6. Treatment of harling and wall renders page 27 7. Treatment of plasterwork page 29 8. Treatment of timberwork page 31 9. Treatment of floors and paving page 35 10. Treatment of concrete page 37 11. Treatment of historic painted decoration page 38 12. Treatment of earthworks associated with architectural monuments page 41 13. Treatment of vegetation at monuments page 44 14. Below-ground archaeology page 49 15. New buildings and developments at or near monuments page 50 16. Restoration of monuments for re-use page 51 17. Recording works at monuments page 57 Bibliography page 58 List of useful addresses page 61 iii THE CONSERVATION OF ARCHITECTURAL ANCIENT MONUMENTS IN SCOTLAND iv THE CONSERVATION OF ARCHITECTURAL ANCIENT MONUMENTS IN SCOTLAND FOREWORD Scotland is an old country, and is fortunate in having the remains of large numbers of buildings that, considered together, provide us with the most tangible and illuminating insights into our past.
  • An Excavation in the Inner Bailey of Shrewsbury Castle

    An Excavation in the Inner Bailey of Shrewsbury Castle

    An excavation in the inner bailey of Shrewsbury Castle Nigel Baker January 2020 An excavation in the inner bailey of Shrewsbury Castle Nigel Baker BA PhD FSA MCIfA January 2020 A report to the Castle Studies Trust 1. Shrewsbury Castle: the inner bailey excavation in progress, July 2019. North to top. (Shropshire Council) Summary In May and July 2019 a two-phase archaeological investigation of the inner bailey of Shrewsbury Castle took place, supported by a grant from the Castle Studies Trust. A geophysical survey by Tiger Geo used resistivity and ground-penetrating radar to identify a hard surface under the north-west side of the inner bailey lawn and a number of features under the western rampart. A trench excavated across the lawn showed that the hard material was the flattened top of natural glacial deposits, the site having been levelled in the post-medieval period, possibly by Telford in the 1790s. The natural gravel was found to have been cut by a twelve-metre wide ditch around the base of the motte, together with pits and garden features. One pit was of late pre-Conquest date. 1 Introduction Shrewsbury Castle is situated on the isthmus, the neck, of the great loop of the river Severn containing the pre-Conquest borough of Shrewsbury, a situation akin to that of the castles at Durham and Bristol. It was in existence within three years of the Battle of Hastings and in 1069 withstood a siege mounted by local rebels against Norman rule under Edric ‘the Wild’ (Sylvaticus). It is one of the best-preserved Conquest-period shire-town earthwork castles in England, but is also one of the least well known, no excavation having previously taken place within the perimeter of the inner bailey.
  • Setting of Historic Assets in Wales

    Setting of Historic Assets in Wales

    Setting of Historic Assets in Wales May 2017 MANAGING 01 Setting of Historic Assets in Wales Statement of Purpose Setting of Historic Assets in Wales explains what setting is, how it contributes to the significance of a historic asset and why it is important. Setting of Historic Assets in Wales also outlines the principles used to assess the potential impact of development or land management proposals within the settings of World Heritage Sites, ancient monuments (scheduled and unscheduled), listed buildings, registered historic parks and gardens, and conservation areas. These principles, however, are equally applicable to all individual historic assets, irrespective of their designation. The guidance is not intended to cover the setting of the historic environment at a landscape scale. This is considered by separate guidance.1 This best-practice guidance is aimed at developers, owners, occupiers and agents, who should use it to inform management plans and proposals for change which may have an impact on the significance of a historic asset and its setting. It should also help them to take account of Cadw’s Conservation Principles for the Sustainable Management of the Historic Environment in Wales (Conservation Principles) to achieve high- quality sensitive change.2 Decision-making authorities and their advisers should also use this guidance alongside Planning Policy Wales,3 Technical Advice Note 24: The Historic Environment,4 Conservation Principles and other best-practice guidance to inform local policies and when considering individual applications for planning permission and listed building, scheduled monument and conservation area consent, including pre-application discussions. Welsh Government Historic Environment Service (Cadw) Plas Carew Unit 5/7 Cefn Coed Parc Nantgarw Cardiff CF15 7QQ Telephone: 03000 256000 Email: [email protected] First published by Cadw in 2017 Digital ISBN 978 1 4734 8700 0 © Crown Copyright 2017, Welsh Government, Cadw, except where specified.
  • Whitestaunton Manor House Whitestaunton Somerset

    Whitestaunton Manor House Whitestaunton Somerset

    Whitestaunton Manor House, Whitestaunton, Somerset An Archaeological Evaluation and an Assessment of the Results Ref: 52568.12 Wessex Archaeology May 2004 WHITESTAUNTON MANOR HOUSE WHITESTAUNTON SOMERSET AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION AND AN ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS Document Ref. 52568.12 May 2004 Prepared for: Videotext Communications Ltd 49 Goldhawk Road LONDON SW1 8QP By: Wessex Archaeology Portway House Old Sarum Park SALISBURY Wiltshire SP4 6EB © Copyright The Trust for Wessex Archaeology Limited 2004, all rights reserved The Trust for Wessex Archaeology Limited, Registered Charity No. 287786 1 WHITESTAUNTON MANOR HOUSE WHITESTAUNTON SOMERSET AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL EVALUATION AND AN ASSESSMENT OF THE RESULTS Contents Summary.................................................................................................................. 5 Acknowledgements ................................................................................................. 6 1 BACKGROUND........................................................................................... 7 1.1 Site location....................................................................................................7 1.2 Geology and topography................................................................................ 7 1.3 Previous archaeological work........................................................................ 8 2 METHODS.................................................................................................. 10 2.1 Introduction.................................................................................................
  • Download Annex A

    Download Annex A

    Landscape Character Assessment in the Blackdown Hills AONB Landscape character describes the qualities and features that make a place distinctive. It can represent an area larger than the AONB or focus on a very specific location. The Blackdown Hills AONB displays a variety of landscape character within a relatively small, distinct area. These local variations in character within the AONB’s landscape are articulated through the Devon-wide Landscape Character Assessment (LCA), which describes the variations in character between different areas and types of landscape in the county and covers the entire AONB. www.devon.gov.uk/planning/planning-policies/landscape/devons-landscape-character- assessment What information does the Devon LCA contain? Devon has been divided into unique geographical areas sharing similar character and recognisable at different scales: 7 National Character Areas, broadly similar areas of landscape defined at a national scale by Natural England and named to an area recognisable on a national scale, for example, ‘Blackdowns’ and ‘Dartmoor’. There are 159 National Character Areas (NCA) in England; except for a very small area in the far west which falls into the Devon Redlands NCA, the Blackdown Hills AONB is within Blackdowns NCA. Further details: www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-character-area-profiles-data-for-local- decision-making/national-character-area-profiles#ncas-in-south-west-england 68 Devon Character Areas, unique, geographically-specific areas of landscape. Each Devon Character Area has an individual identity, but most comprise several different Landscape Character Types. Devon Character Areas are called by a specific place name, for example, ‘Blackdown Hills Scarp’ and ‘Axe Valley’.
  • Portchester Castle Student Activity Sheets

    Portchester Castle Student Activity Sheets

    STUDENT ACTIVITY SHEETS Portchester Castle This resource has been designed to help students step into the story of Portchester Castle, which provides essential insight into over 1,700 years of history. It was a Roman fort, a Saxon stronghold, a royal castle and eventually a prison. Give these activity sheets to students on site to help them explore Portchester Castle. Get in touch with our Education Booking Team: 0370 333 0606 [email protected] https://bookings.english-heritage.org.uk/education Don’t forget to download our Hazard Information Sheets and Discovery Visit Risk Assessments to help with planning: • In the Footsteps of Kings • Big History: From Dominant Castle to Hidden Fort Share your visit with us @EHEducation The English Heritage Trust is a charity, no. 1140351, and a company, no. 07447221, registered in England. All images are copyright of English Heritage or Historic England unless otherwise stated. Published July 2017 Portchester Castle is over 1,700 years old! It was a Roman fort, a Saxon stronghold, a royal palace and eventually a prison. Its commanding location means it has played a major part in defending Portsmouth Harbour EXPLORE and the Solent for hundreds of years. THE CASTLE DISCOVER OUR TOP 10 Explore the castle in small groups. THINGS TO SEE Complete the challenges to find out about Portchester’s exciting past. 1 ROMAN WALLS These walls were built between AD 285 and 290 by a Roman naval commander called Carausius. He was in charge of protecting this bit of the coast from pirate attacks. The walls’ core is made from layers of flint, bonded together with mortar.
  • Castelli Di Bellinzona

    Castelli Di Bellinzona

    Trenino Artù -design.net Key Escape Room Torre Nera La Torre Nera di Castelgrande vi aspetta per vivere una entusiasmante espe- rienza e un fantastico viaggio nel tempo! Codici, indizi e oggetti misteriosi che vi daranno la libertà! Una Room ambientata in una location suggestiva, circondati da 700 anni di storia! Prenotate subito la vostra avventura medievale su www.blockati.ch Escape Room Torre Nera C Im Turm von Castelgrande auch “Torre Nera” genannt, kannst du ein aufre- gendes Erlebnis und eine unglaubliche Zeitreise erleben! Codes, Hinweise M und mysteriöse Objekte entschlüsseln, die dir die Freiheit geben! Ein Raum in Y einer anziehender Lage, umgeben von 700 Jahren Geschichte! CM Buchen Sie jetzt Ihr mittelalterliches Abenteuer auf www.blockati.ch MY Escape Room Tour Noire CY La Tour Noire de Castelgrande, vous attends pour vivre une expérience pas- CMY sionnante et un voyage fantastique dans le temps ! Des codes, des indices et des objets mystérieux vous donneront la liberté! Une salle dans un lieu Preise / Prix / Prices Orari / Fahrplan / Horaire / Timetable K évocateur, entouré de 700 ans d’histoire ! Piazza Collegiata Partenza / Abfahrt / Lieu de départ / Departure Réservez votre aventure médiévale dès maintenant sur www.blockati.ch Trenino Artù aprile-novembre Do – Ve / So – Fr / Di – Ve / Su – Fr 10.00 / 11.20 / 13.30 / 15.00 / 16.30 Adulti 12.– Piazza Governo Partenza / Abfahrt / Lieu de départ / Departure Escape Room Black Tower Sa 11.20 / 13.30 The Black Tower of Castelgrande, to live an exciting experience and a fan- Ridotti Piazza Collegiata Partenza / Abfahrt / Lieu de départ / Departure tastic journey through time! Codes, clues and mysterious objects that will Senior (+65), studenti e ragazzi 6 – 16 anni 10.– Sa 15.00 / 16.30 give you freedom! A Room set in an evocative location, surrounded by 700 a Castelgrande, years of history! Gruppi (min.
  • Tarbert Castle

    Tarbert Castle

    TARBERT CASTLE EXCAVATION PROJECT DESIGN March 2018 Roderick Regan Tarbert Castle: Our Castle of Kings A Community Archaeological Excavation. Many questions remain as to the origin of Tarbert castle, its development and its layout, while the function of many of its component features remain unclear. Also unclear is whether the remains of medieval royal burgh extend along the ridge to the south of the castle. A programme of community archaeological excavation would answer some of these questions, leading to a better interpretation, presentation and future protection of the castle, while promoting the castle as an important place through generated publicity and the excitement of local involvement. Several areas within the castle itself readily suggest areas of potential investigation, particularly the building ranges lining the inner bailey and the presumed entrance into the outer bailey. Beyond the castle to the south are evidence of ditches and terracing while anomalies detected during a previous geophysical survey suggest further fruitful areas of investigation, which might help establish the presence of the putative medieval burgh. A programme of archaeology involving the community of Tarbert would not only shed light on this important medieval monument but would help to ensure it remained a ‘very centrical place’ in the future. Kilmartin Museum Argyll, PA31 8RQ Tel: 01546 510 278 Email: http://www.kilmartin.org © 2018 Kilmartin Museum Company Ltd SC 022744. Kilmartin House Trading Co. Ltd. SC 166302 (Scotland) ii Contents 1. Introduction 1 2. Tarbert Castle 5 2.1 Location and Topography 5 2.2 Historical Background 5 3 Archaeological and Background 5 3.1 Laser Survey 6 3.2 Geophysical Survey 6 3.3 Ground and Photographic Survey 6 3.4 Excavation 7 3.5 Watching Brief 7 3.6 Recorded Artefacts 7 4.
  • Heritage at Risk in Northern Ireland

    Heritage at Risk in Northern Ireland

    HERITAGE AT RISK IN NORTHERN IRELAND REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS January 2019 A report by Ulster Architectural Heritage, as part of the Built Heritage at Risk Project, funded by Department for Communities, Historic Environment Division, 2013 - 2016. Published January 2019. FOREWARD: The Built Heritage at Risk Northern Ireland (BHARNI) project was first established in 1993 as a partnership between the Ulster Architectural Heritage Society (UAHS) now retitled Ulster Architectural Heritage (UAH), and the then Environment and Heritage Service of the Department of the Environment which became NIEA, and now, the Historic Environment Division (HED) of the Department for Communities. It was initially named the ‘Buildings at Risk’ (BAR), becoming ‘Built Heritage at Risk Northern Ireland’ in 2006. Our thanks go to Mrs Primrose Wilson CBE, current President of UAH, who was instrumental in establishing and maintaining the project. We would like to formally acknowledge her tremendous support, without which the heritage at risk project could not have succeeded. I also want to pay tribute to the Department Officers and UAH staff who over the years brought a focus and dynamism to the project ensuring it was both appropriate and innovative. This report, commissioned in 2016, is based on statistics and information gathered at that time. The review and recommendations have been extensively developed in the interim period, and this report has formed the basis upon which UAH has proposed to move the heritage at risk project forward, in a recently renewed agreement with HED from April 2019. Though some figures may have changed to a degree in the intervening period, this is not seen to effect overall trends discussed in this report, and recommendations set out remain at time of release in 2019.
  • 8 Cultural Heritage

    8 Cultural Heritage

    Transport Scotland A82 Pulpit Rock Improvement Environmental Statement 8 Cultural Heritage 8.1 Introduction This chapter considers the likely effects on cultural heritage of the proposed upgrading and realignment of a section of the A82, close to the Scheduled Monument Pulpit Rock. The assessment has been carried out by CFA Archaeology Ltd, informed by information provided by Historic Scotland and The West of Scotland Archaeology Service (WoSAS) in response to request for Information. Cultural Heritage resources are considered to include: • World Heritage Sites; • Scheduled Monuments and other archaeological features; • Listed Buildings and other buildings of historic or architectural importance; • Conservation Areas and other significant townscapes; and • Historic Gardens and Designed Landscapes and other significant historic landscapes. Those resources relevant to this development are: Scheduled Monuments and other archaeological features; Listed Buildings and other buildings of historic or architectural value. There are no Historic Garden and Designed Landscapes and other significant historic landscapes; World Heritage Sites or Conservation areas within the assessment area. The specific objectives of this cultural heritage assessment are to: • Identify the cultural heritage baseline within and in the vicinity of the proposed development area; • Assess the proposed development site in terms of its archaeological and historic environment potential; • Consider the potential and predicted effects of the construction and operation of the proposed development on the cultural heritage resources, within the context of relevant legislation and policy guidelines; • Propose measures, where appropriate, to mitigate any predicted significant adverse effects. There are a number of cultural heritage receptors within 1km of the proposed development and Figure 8.1 – Cultural Heritage Assets depicts the locations of those sites identified and discussed throughout this chapter.
  • Great Bealings Neighbourhood Plan a Village in a Landscape

    Great Bealings Neighbourhood Plan a Village in a Landscape

    Great Bealings Neighbourhood Plan A village in a landscape Referendum Version December 2016 Great Bealings Neighbourhood Plan ‘A Village in a Landscape’ Mission Statement Our aim is to maintain and enhance the special character of our small village within its natural setting while ensuring that the community who has chosen to live here can control, shape and contribute to how it evolves for the benefit of themselves, future residents and subsequent generations. Contents Page 1. INTRODUCTION 1 2. HISTORICAL CONTEXT 6 3. STRATEGY AND APPROACH 11 4. NATURAL ENVIRONMENT 16 5. BUILT ENVIRONMENT 31 6. NON-STATUTORY ANNEX Error! Bookmark not defined. 7. REFERENCES – accessed 1 September 2015 41 Appendices 1. Maps 2. Listed Buildings 3. Non Designated Heritage Assets 4. SCDC Guidance on design criteria and materials 5. Community Engagement Strategy 6. Neighbourhood Plan Questionnaire Responses 7. NPPF Guidance re. Neighbourhood Planning 8. Housing Needs Survey 9. Landscape and Wildlife Evaluation Supporting documents Where not included in this full printed version of the Plan, these are published on the website, www.gbnp.co.uk, with kind permission, and available from their respective publishing bodies: Great Bealings Neighbourhood Plan: Landscape and Wildlife Evaluation, published by Simone Bullion, Suffolk Wildlife Trust Suffolk’s Nature Strategy, published by Suffolk County Council Great Bealings Neighbourhood Plan Questionnaire, published by Great Bealings Parish Council Housing Needs Survey, published by Community Action Suffolk Great Bealings NP [19.00c] Page 1 Published 8 March 2016 The Plan as a whole is published by Great Bealings Parish Council, March 2016 Cover photo by Gary Farmer – thanks also to the many contributors Submission Version 19.00, 8 March 2016 Great Bealings NP [19.00c] Page 2 Published 8 March 2016 1.