Why Were the Sclavenes Never Roman Allies?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Why Were the Sclavenes Never Roman Allies? WHY WERE THE SCLAVENES NEVER ROMAN ALLIES? A Study of Late Antique Roman Frontier Policy and a Barbarian Society By Amy Wood BA/LLB (Hons.) Macquarie University A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILLMENT OF THE DEGREE OF MASTERS OF RESEARCH DEPARTMENT OF ANCIENT HISTORY, FACULTY OF ARTS, MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY OCTOBER 2015 Except where acknowledged in the customary manner, the material presented in this thesis is, to the best of my knowledge, original and has not been submitted in whole or part for a higher degree at any university or institution. Amy Wood For my parents and grandparents Contents Acknowledgements iii List of Figures & Maps v Abbreviations vii Summary ix 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Current State of Research . 3 1.2 The Conceptual and Methodological Framework . 10 1.3 The Written Sources . 13 1.3.1 Contemporary Eastern Sources . .16 1.3.1.1 Procopius of Caesarea . .16 1.3.1.2 Jordanes . 18 1.3.1.3 Agathias Scholasticus . 20 1.3.1.4 John Malalas . .21 1.3.1.5 Menander the Guardsman . .22 1.3.1.6 The Strategikon of Maurice . .23 1.3.1.7 Theophylact Simocatta . .23 1.3.1.8 The Miracles of Saint Demetrius . 24 1.3.2 Contemporary Western Sources . .25 1.3.2.1 Fredegar . 26 1.3.3 Later Sources . 27 1.3.3.1 Paul the Deacon . 27 1.3.3.2 Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus . .27 1.4 The Archaeological Evidence . 28 2 Rome and the Historical Context 35 2.1 Rome in Late Antiquity . 35 2.2 Framing Rome and the Barbarians in Late Antiquity: Frontiers, Empire, and Policy . 38 2.2.1 Frontiers and Empire . 38 ~ i ~ 2.2.2 Roman Frontier Policy in Late Antiquity . .40 2.2.3 The Effects of Roman Frontier Policy on Late Antique Barbarian Societies . 48 2.3 Framing Rome and the Sclavenes in Late Antiquity: The Narrative . .55 3 The Sclavenes 61 3.1 Sclavene Society in the Sixth and Seventh Centuries . .61 3.2 The Sclavenes and Rome . .77 3.3 The Sclavenes and the First Avar Khaganate . .88 4 Why were the Sclavenes Never Roman Allies? 93 4.1 Historical Circumstances . .93 4.2 An Alternative Society . 97 4.3 Alternative Orbits . 101 5 Conclusion 105 Appendix A – Chronology of Sclavene Activity in the Sixth and Seventh Centuries and other important events 109 Appendix B – The Written Sources: Extracts 115 B.1 The Eastern Sources. .115 B.1.1 Procopius of Caesarea, Wars and Secret History. .115 B.1.2 Jordanes, Getica. .119 B.1.3 Agathias, Histories. 122 B.1.4 Menander the Guardsman, fragments. 123 B.1.5 The Strategikon. .126 B.1.6 Theophylact Simocatta, History. 132 B.1.7 The Miracles of Saint Demetrius. 135 B.2 The Western Sources . 143 B.2.1 Fredegar, Chronicle. 143 B.2.2. Gregory the Great, Letters. 146 B.2.3 Paul the Deacon, History of the Langobards. .147 References 149 ~ ii ~ Acknowledgements The past two years have been a learning experience for me in more ways than one, both as a historian and as a person. An abandoned Honours thesis lies eight years in my past and a lot of confidence in my own abilities was abandoned with it. Trying again and learning to trust myself was certainly daunting. There were some missteps along the way, but I am very pleased to now present this thesis. I’d like to thank my wonderful supervisor, Dr. Danijel Dzino. I know I wasn’t always the easiest student to supervise and my time management could have been better, but you always had time for me and chased me up when I wasn’t where I should have been. I can’t say how appreciative of that I am. Your wealth of knowledge is astounding and was so very helpful in nudging me in the right direction and in refining my arguments. I need to thank you for leading me into an area of Late Antique history which had piqued my interest years earlier as an undergraduate but which I never had an opportunity to explore further until now. The Macquarie Ancient History Department is very lucky to have you on staff to expand the horizons of Ancient History students to Eastern Europe and the Balkans. Thank you also for the fabulous opportunity to participate in the excavation at Bribirska Glavica in Croatia earlier this year. Also in the Ancient History Department, I’d like to thank the Masters of Research Convenors Assoc. Prof. Andrew Gillett and Dr. Malcolm Choat. Andrew, your brutal honestly about what it took to pursue this path was much appreciated, as was your preliminary advice on selecting an appropriate topic. Thank you for putting up with my usual shenanigans. Malcolm, you prepared our cohort so well over the last two years and it was always so enjoyable. My thanks to you (and Rachel!) for that. To my friends who were so understanding when I couldn’t follow through on plans and promises because I was studying, thank you all. Your cheerful middle of the night emails when I was sleep-deprived and stressed got me through some long hours. Lastly, a huge thank you to my family who bore the brunt of my stress and occasional tantrums. I don’t know what I’d do without my brothers and sisters, whose love and emotional support is invaluable to me. My debt of ~ iii ~ gratitude to my parents cannot not adequately be expressed. They were always, always willing to do whatever it took to help me get to the end successfully, no matter the inconvenience to them. They are truly the best people I know. I left the legal profession in mid-2012 in order to chase a dream and this thesis is a big step towards achieving that dream. At times it was challenging, at others times overwhelming, and a lot of the time it was a huge amount of fun – Ancient History never ceases to engender in me a sense of wonder and the desire to learn more. The completion of this thesis is something I am very proud of regardless of what happens next, and I again thank everyone who helped me get there in the end. ~ iv ~ List of Figures & Maps Page 1 Map of material cultures of the first half of the sixth century 32 2 Map of material cultures of the second half of the sixth century 33 3 Long Walls of Constantinople and the Istranca Daglar range 41 4 Map of the Balkans showing key locations in relation to Justinian’s fortification of the region 42 5 Late Roman chip-carving 54 6 Gold bracteate, northern Germanic 54 7 Excavated sunken house with stone oven 64 8 Reconstructed sunken house line-drawing 64 9 Prague-Korčhak and Peňkovka pottery 65 10 Suceava-Şipot pottery 65 11 Fingered Slavic Bow Fibula 72 12 Slavic Bow Fibula 72 13 Examples of clay pans found on sixth and seventh century sites 73 ~ v ~ ~ vi ~ Abbreviations Caes. Sextus Aurelius Victor, Epitome de Caesaribus, New York. DAI De Administrando Imperio, Washington. Hist.Lang. Paul the Deacon, Historia Langobardorum or History of the Langobards, Philadelphia. ILS Inscriptiones Latinae Selectae, Berlin. PL Patrologia Latina, Paris. SHA Scriptores Historiae Augustae, London & Cambridge. A note on the sources: for the sake of consistency, the ancient sources will be named or abbreviated based on the edition or translation used as per the bibliography (English or ancient language), or as they are otherwise commonly known e.g. Jordanes’ Getica, Ammianus Marcellinus’ Res Gestae. The book numbering for all of Procopius’ works will follow the Loeb editions as per the bibliography. ~ vii ~ ~ viii ~ Summary This thesis addresses evidence which suggests that those barbarians identified as Sclavenes in the sources never became fully integrated into the Roman system of alliances or its cultural orbit in the sixth and seventh centuries. The written and archaeological evidence available is examined to compare it with previous Roman-barbarian relationships to draw reasonable conclusions about the Sclavene relationship with the Eastern Roman Empire and to some extent, the nature of Sclavene society before it transformed into the recognisable Slavic polities of the Early Middle Ages. The question is conceptualised within the overall framework of the Late Antique Roman frontiers along the Danube and its hinterland on either side (the Balkans and Pontic-Danubian region). This is the point at which the Sclavenes become visible in the written sources and where the cause and effect of Roman barbarian policy can be seen over time and across various (mainly Germanic) barbarian groups in both the written and archaeological material. It will be argued that the Sclavenes were never Roman allies due to a confluence of historical circumstances, the nature of Sclavene society itself, and the availability and operation of alternative imperial orbits in Central Eastern Europe, namely the First Avar Khaganate. ~ ix ~ ~ x ~ Chapter 1 Introduction In the early sixth century A.D., a completely unknown group of barbarians arrived on Rome’s Lower Danubian frontier.1 Throughout the course of the following two centuries, they caused considerable damage to the Eastern Roman Empire and eventually succeeded in settling much of the Balkans and Central Eastern Europe. There were at least two different groups mentioned in the sources, the Sclavenes and Antes, who were often assumed by those sources to be related to each other in terms of origin, language and culture. Regardless of whether or not this was the case, their respective trajectories vis-à-vis the Eastern Roman Empire are illustrative of the central concern of this thesis – that on the basis of the available evidence, those barbarians identified as Sclavenes never became fully integrated into the Roman system of alliances or its cultural orbit in the sixth and seventh centuries.
Recommended publications
  • The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the D
    The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Marion Woodrow Kruse, III Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Anthony Kaldellis, Advisor; Benjamin Acosta-Hughes; Nathan Rosenstein Copyright by Marion Woodrow Kruse, III 2015 ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the use of Roman historical memory from the late fifth century through the middle of the sixth century AD. The collapse of Roman government in the western Roman empire in the late fifth century inspired a crisis of identity and political messaging in the eastern Roman empire of the same period. I argue that the Romans of the eastern empire, in particular those who lived in Constantinople and worked in or around the imperial administration, responded to the challenge posed by the loss of Rome by rewriting the history of the Roman empire. The new historical narratives that arose during this period were initially concerned with Roman identity and fixated on urban space (in particular the cities of Rome and Constantinople) and Roman mythistory. By the sixth century, however, the debate over Roman history had begun to infuse all levels of Roman political discourse and became a major component of the emperor Justinian’s imperial messaging and propaganda, especially in his Novels. The imperial history proposed by the Novels was aggressivley challenged by other writers of the period, creating a clear historical and political conflict over the role and import of Roman history as a model or justification for Roman politics in the sixth century.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 O'connor Patrick Morris 0431545 Ethesis
    This electronic thesis or dissertation has been downloaded from the King’s Research Portal at https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/ The psychology of warrior culture in the post-Roman Frankish kingdoms Morris O'Connor, Patrick Awarding institution: King's College London The copyright of this thesis rests with the author and no quotation from it or information derived from it may be published without proper acknowledgement. END USER LICENCE AGREEMENT Unless another licence is stated on the immediately following page this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work Under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non Commercial: You may not use this work for commercial purposes. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you receive permission from the author. Your fair dealings and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 01. Oct. 2021 The Psychology of Warrior Culture in the Post-Roman Frankish Kingdoms Patrick Morris O’Connor A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy King’s College London 2019 0 Abstract Warfare and violence in the post-Roman West have attracted much interest, and historians have used the insights of social anthropology and literary theory to interpret the evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Francia. Band 44
    Francia. Forschungen zur Westeuropäischen Geschichte. Herausgegeben vom Deutschen Historischen Institut Paris (Institut historique allemand) Band 44 (2017) Nithard as a Military Historian of the Carolingian Empire, c 833–843 DOI: 10.11588/fr.2017.0.68995 Copyright Das Digitalisat wird Ihnen von perspectivia.net, der Online-Publikationsplattform der Max Weber Stiftung – Deutsche Geisteswissenschaftliche Institute im Ausland, zur Verfügung gestellt. Bitte beachten Sie, dass das Digitalisat urheberrechtlich geschützt ist. Erlaubt ist aber das Lesen, das Ausdrucken des Textes, das Herunterladen, das Speichern der Daten auf einem eigenen Datenträger soweit die vorgenannten Handlungen ausschließlich zu privaten und nicht-kommerziellen Zwecken erfolgen. Eine darüber hinausgehende unerlaubte Verwendung, Reproduktion oder Weitergabe einzelner Inhalte oder Bilder können sowohl zivil- als auch strafrechtlich verfolgt werden. Bernard S. Bachrach – David S. Bachrach NITHARD AS A MILITARY HISTORIAN OF THE CAROLINGIAN EMPIRE, C 833–843 Introduction Despite the substantially greater volume of sources that provide information about the military affairs of the ninth century as compared to the eighth, the lion’s share of scholarly attention concerning Carolingian military history has been devoted to the reign of Charlemagne, particularly before his imperial coronation in 800, rather than to his descendants1. Indeed, much of the basic work on the sources, that is required to establish how they can be used to answer questions about military matters in the period after Charlemagne, remains to be done. An unfortunate side-effect of this rel- ative neglect of military affairs as well as source criticism for the ninth century has been considerable confusion about the nature and conduct of war in this period2.
    [Show full text]
  • 109 I. INTRODUCTION the Strategikon Is a Roman Military
    A C T A AThe R SCTra HT egikonA E Oa S La SOource G I —C SlavA SC andA Ra varP SA… T H I C109 A VOL. LII, 2017 PL ISSN 0001-5229 ŁUKASZ Różycki THE STRATEGIKON AS A SOURCE — SLAVS AND AVARS IN THE EYES OF PSEUDO-MAURICE, CURRENT STATE OF RESEARCH AND FUTURE RESEARCH PERSPECTIVES ABSTRACT Ł. Różycki 2017. The Strategikon as a source — Slavs and Avars in the eyes of Pseudo-Maurice, current state of research and future research perspectives, AAC 52:109–131. The purpose of the piece The Strategikon as a source — Slavs and Avars in the eyes of Pseudo- Maurice, current state of research and future research perspectives is to demonstrate what the author of Strategikon knew about the Slavs and Avars and review the state of research on the chapter of the treatise that deals with these two barbarian ethnicities. As a side note to the de- scription of contemporary studies of Strategikon, the piece also lists promising areas of research, which have not yet received proper attention from scholars. K e y w o r d s: Migration Period; Early Middle Ages; Balkans; Byzantium; Strategicon; Strategikon; Emperor Maurice; Slavs; Avars Received: 15.03.2017; Revised: 30.07.2017; Revised: 19.10.2017; Revised: 29.10.2017; Accepted: 30.10.2017 I. INTRODUCTION The Strategikon is a Roman military treatise, written at the end of the 6th or the beginning of the 7th century. It is one of the seminal sources not only on East Roman military history but also on the Slavs, the Avars and other peoples neighboring the Empire at the onset of the Middle Ages.
    [Show full text]
  • Book of Abstracts
    BOOK OF ABSTRACTS 1 Institute of Archaeology Belgrade, Serbia 24. LIMES CONGRESS Serbia 02-09 September 2018 Belgrade - Viminacium BOOK OF ABSTRACTS Belgrade 2018 PUBLISHER Institute of Archaeology Kneza Mihaila 35/IV 11000 Belgrade http://www.ai.ac.rs [email protected] Tel. +381 11 2637-191 EDITOR IN CHIEF Miomir Korać Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade EDITORS Snežana Golubović Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade Nemanja Mrđić Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade GRAPHIC DESIGN Nemanja Mrđić PRINTED BY DigitalArt Beograd PRINTED IN 500 copies ISBN 979-86-6439-039-2 4 CONGRESS COMMITTEES Scientific committee Miomir Korać, Institute of Archaeology (director) Snežana Golubović, Institute of Archaeology Miroslav Vujović, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Archaeology Stefan Pop-Lazić, Institute of Archaeology Gordana Jeremić, Institute of Archaeology Nemanja Mrđić, Institute of Archaeology International Advisory Committee David Breeze, Durham University, Historic Scotland Rebecca Jones, Historic Environment Scotland Andreas Thiel, Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart, Landesamt für Denkmalpflege, Esslingen Nigel Mills, Heritage Consultant, Interpretation, Strategic Planning, Sustainable Development Sebastian Sommer, Bayerisches Landesamt für Denkmalpflege Lydmil Vagalinski, National Archaeological Institute with Museum – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences Mirjana Sanader, Odsjek za arheologiju Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu Organization committee Miomir Korać, Institute of Archaeology (director) Snežana Golubović, Institute of Archaeology
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Dissertation
    University of Groningen The growth of an Austrasian identity Stegeman, Hans IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF) if you wish to cite from it. Please check the document version below. Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Publication date: 2014 Link to publication in University of Groningen/UMCG research database Citation for published version (APA): Stegeman, H. (2014). The growth of an Austrasian identity: Processes of identification and legend construction in the Northeast of the Regnum Francorum, 600-800. Copyright Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). The publication may also be distributed here under the terms of Article 25fa of the Dutch Copyright Act, indicated by the “Taverne” license. More information can be found on the University of Groningen website: https://www.rug.nl/library/open-access/self-archiving-pure/taverne- amendment. Take-down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from the University of Groningen/UMCG research database (Pure): http://www.rug.nl/research/portal. For technical reasons the number of authors shown on this cover page is limited to 10 maximum. Download date: 02-10-2021 The growth of an Austrasian identity Processes of identification and legend construction in the Northeast of the Regnum Francorum, 600-800 Proefschrift ter verkrijging van het doctoraat aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen op gezag van de rector magnificus dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Glass in Ancient and Medieval Eastern Europe As Evidence of International Contacts
    Archeologia Polski 61 (2016), pp. 191-212 Archeologia Polski, LXI: 2016 PL ISSN 0003-8180 Ekaterina STOLYAROVA GLASS IN ANCIENT AND MEDIEVAL EASTERN EUROPE AS EVIDENCE OF INTERNATIONAL CONTACTS Abstract: This paper deals with glass artifacts as markers of interregional economic, religious and cultural links, trade routes, and social stratification. It is focused on finds from Eastern Europe from the Bronze Age to the 17th–18th centuries A.D. Keywords: glass beads, glass vessels, Eastern Europe, international links. Introduction Glass is one of the most ancient artificial materials possessing unique properties from which a variety of artifacts can be made. Among these are luxury artifacts and objects of applied art, tesserae for figured mosaics and stained glass, glass icons and ritual vessels, window-panes and tableware as well as small ornaments, i.e., arm rings, beads, fingerings, buttons and pendants. These artifacts were used in daily life, sold, donated, used to decorate clothes, interiors and architectural structures. They were symbols of their owner’s social and economic position. The value of glass as a historical source stems from its extensive application. Glass objects provide information on the formation and spread of glassmaking and on the place of glass in scientific concepts and the production of a given epoch. Chemical properties of glass and means of its production are of technological interest. Glass artifacts are important for the study of culture and daily life of a given epoch, e.g. the history of costume. Excavated glass objects are examined from the angle of their functions, peculiarities of their form and decoration, the spread and evolution of different type.
    [Show full text]
  • Gerhard Müller. Die Römische Kurie Und Die Reformation 1523–1534
    Modern Europe AVERIL CAMERON. Agathias. New York: Oxford MODERN EUROPE University Press. 1970. Pp. ix, 168. $5.50. GERHARD MULLER. Die romische Kurie und die Agathias, a poet, anthologist, and practicing Reformation I523-I534: Kirche und Politik lawyer, wrote a continuation of Procopius, wiihrend des Pontifikates Clemens' VII. (Quel­ len und Forschungen zur Reformationsge­ relating the wars of Justinian from 552 to schichte, Number 38.) [Gutersloh:] Gutersloher 559. He is one of the few secular historians Verlagshaus Gerd Mohn. 1969. Pp. 307. DM 45. of the early Byzantine period whose work survives in full; and although we might well In attempting to comprehend the actions of prefer the accidents of preservation to have Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/ahr/article/76/3/767/94214 by guest on 30 September 2021 Pope Clement VII, even Charles v's memoirs spared Eunapius, Priscus, or Menander in­ express the exasperation: "God knows why stead, Agathias is of uncontestable value not the Pope acted thus." Divine understanding only as a source of data but also as a repre­ aside, Gerhard Muller's historical under­ sentative of the literary tradition in which he standing of Clement's politics does omit very wrote. revealing evidence as to the pope's rationale. It is particularly from the latter standpoint Contarini, "the Venetian More," put an ar­ that Mrs. Cameron has studied him, for, as gument before Clement as regards the latter's she insists, Agathias prized the literary qual­ choice of seeking the particular good of the ity of his work at least as highly as its veracity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Edictum Theoderici: a Study of a Roman Legal Document from Ostrogothic Italy
    The Edictum Theoderici: A Study of a Roman Legal Document from Ostrogothic Italy By Sean D.W. Lafferty A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto © Copyright by Sean D.W. Lafferty 2010 The Edictum Theoderici: A Study of a Roman Legal Document from Ostrogothic Italy Sean D.W. Lafferty Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Toronto 2010 Abstract This is a study of a Roman legal document of unknown date and debated origin conventionally known as the Edictum Theoderici (ET). Comprised of 154 edicta, or provisions, in addition to a prologue and epilogue, the ET is a significant but largely overlooked document for understanding the institutions of Roman law, legal administration and society in the West from the fourth to early sixth century. The purpose is to situate the text within its proper historical and legal context, to understand better the processes involved in the creation of new law in the post-Roman world, as well as to appreciate how the various social, political and cultural changes associated with the end of the classical world and the beginning of the Middle Ages manifested themselves in the domain of Roman law. It is argued here that the ET was produced by a group of unknown Roman jurisprudents working under the instructions of the Ostrogothic king Theoderic the Great (493-526), and was intended as a guide for settling disputes between the Roman and Ostrogothic inhabitants of Italy. A study of its contents in relation to earlier Roman law and legal custom preserved in imperial decrees and juristic commentaries offers a revealing glimpse into how, and to what extent, Roman law survived and evolved in Italy following the decline and eventual collapse of imperial authority in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crossing of the Danube and the Gothic Conversion , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:3 (1986:Autumn) P.289
    HEATHER, PETER, The Crossing of the Danube and the Gothic Conversion , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:3 (1986:Autumn) p.289 The Crossing of the Danube and the Gothic Conversion Peter Heather MMIANUS MARCELLINUS provides a detailed account of the re­ A lations between the Emperor Valens and the Goths during the period 367-378. But essentially because Ammianus does not mention it, there has been much controversy over the date of a Gothic conversion to Christianity ascribed in other sources to the reign of Valens. Equally, because the historians Socrates and So­ zomen link a civil war among the Goths to the conversion, it has also been unclear when this split might have taken place. It will be argued here that the primary accounts found in Socrates, Sozomen, and Eunapius can be reconciled with the secondary ones of Jordanes, Theodoret, and Orosius to suggest a Gothic conversion in 376. Fur­ ther, combined with Ammianus, they strongly indicate that Christian­ ity initially affected only elements of one Gothic group, the Tervingi, and was part of the agreement by which Valens allowed them to cross the Danube and enter the Empire in 376. It also becomes clear that the split too affected only the Tervingi, and occurred immediately before the crossing and conversion. This reconstruction in turn highlights the Huns' role in overturning the established order in Gothic society: their attacks first divided the Tervingi, who were unable to agree on an appropriate response, and prompted the larger group to seek asylum in the Empire and accept conversion to Christianity.
    [Show full text]
  • Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation
    Empire of Hope and Tragedy: Jordanes and the Invention of Roman-Gothic History Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Brian Swain Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Timothy Gregory, Co-advisor Anthony Kaldellis Kristina Sessa, Co-advisor Copyright by Brian Swain 2014 Abstract This dissertation explores the intersection of political and ethnic conflict during the emperor Justinian’s wars of reconquest through the figure and texts of Jordanes, the earliest barbarian voice to survive antiquity. Jordanes was ethnically Gothic - and yet he also claimed a Roman identity. Writing from Constantinople in 551, he penned two Latin histories on the Gothic and Roman pasts respectively. Crucially, Jordanes wrote while Goths and Romans clashed in the imperial war to reclaim the Italian homeland that had been under Gothic rule since 493. That a Roman Goth wrote about Goths while Rome was at war with Goths is significant and has no analogue in the ancient record. I argue that it was precisely this conflict which prompted Jordanes’ historical inquiry. Jordanes, though, has long been considered a mere copyist, and seldom treated as an historian with ideas of his own. And the few scholars who have treated Jordanes as an original author have dampened the significance of his Gothicness by arguing that barbarian ethnicities were evanescent and subsumed by the gravity of a Roman political identity. They hold that Jordanes was simply a Roman who can tell us only about Roman things, and supported the Roman emperor in his war against the Goths.
    [Show full text]
  • Migrating in the Medieval East Roman World, Ca. 600–1204
    Chapter 5 Migrating in the Medieval East Roman World, ca. 600–1204 Yannis Stouraitis The movement of groups in the Byzantine world can be distinguished between two basic types: first, movement from outside-in the empire; second, move- ment within the – at any time – current boundaries of the Constantinopolitan emperor’s political authority. This distinction is important insofar as the first type of movement – usually in form of invasion or penetration of foreign peo- ples in imperial lands – was mainly responsible for the extensive rearrange- ment of its geopolitical boundaries within which the second type took place. The disintegration of the empire’s western parts due to the migration of the Germanic peoples in the 5th century was the event that set in motion the con- figuration of the medieval image of the East Roman Empire by establishing the perception in the eastern parts of the Mediterranean that there could be only one Roman community in the world, that within the boundaries of authority of the Roman emperor of Constantinople.1 From that time on, the epicentre of the Roman world shifted toward the East. The geopolitical sphere of the imperial state of Constantinople included the broader areas that were roughly circumscribed by the Italian peninsula in the west, the regions of Mesopotamia and the Caucasus in the east, the North- African shores in the south, and the Danube in the north.2 The Slavic settle- ments in the Balkans and the conquest of the eastern provinces by the Muslims between the late-6th and the late-7th century were the two major develop- ments that caused a further contraction of east Roman political boundaries, thus creating a discrepancy between the latter and the boundaries of the Christian commonwealth that had been established in the east in the course of late antiquity.3 This new geopolitical status quo created new conditions regarding the movement of people and groups within the Empire.
    [Show full text]