Modern Intellectual Property Law

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Modern Intellectual Property Law Modern Intellectual Property Law Modern Intellectual Property Law combines coverage of each intellectual property right granted for creations of the mind into a thoughtful, unified textbook. Decon- structing the fundamental topics into short, clear sections separated by subheadings throughout, Colston and Galloway’s text is the ideal student companion to this intriguing area of the law. This new edition has been completely revised to bring it up to date with the latest debate and changes to the law. All significant recent developments are covered including the continuing controversy over patents for computer- implemented inventions and biotechnological inventions, the House of Lords’ developments of patent law, the ECJ jurisprudence relating to trade mark dilution and comparative advertising, as well as the database right, and international efforts to reconcile copyright with peer-to-peer file sharing. This text also discusses the ongoing effort to achieve an appropriate balance between intellectual property and competition law in order to protect market competition while retaining key incentives to drive the process of innovation. Written for students, this accessible and comprehensive textbook provides the perfect starting point for anyone studying intellectual property law in the UK. Catherine Colston is a Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Strathclyde. She teaches postgraduate and undergraduate classes in Issues in Intellectual Property (Hons) and Intellectual Property and her research spans both Intellectual Property and Information Technology Law. Jonathan Galloway is a Lecturer in Law at Newcastle University and an Attorney at law in New York. His teaching and research focuses primarily on UK and EU Com- petition Law. Modern Intellectual Property Law Third Edition Catherine Colston Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Strathclyde. Jonathan Galloway Lecturer in Law at Newcastle University. Previous two editions by Catherine Colston and Kirstie Middleton Third edition published 2010 by Routledge 2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN Simultaneously published in the USA and Canada by Routledge 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016 Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2010. To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk. © 2010 Catherine Colston and Jonathan Galloway Previous editions published by Cavendish Publishing Limited First edition 1999 Second edition 2005 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A catalog record for this book has been requested ISBN 0-203-86917-6 Master e-book ISBN ISBN10: 0-415-55672-4 (hbk) ISBN10: 0-415-55671-6 (pbk) ISBN10: 0-203-86917-6 (ebk) ISBN13: 978-0-415-55672-9 (hbk) ISBN13: 978-0-415-55671-2 (pbk) ISBN13: 978-0-203-86917-8 (ebk) Outline Contents Preface xiv Table of cases xvi Table of statutes xlii Table of statutory instruments lii Table of EU legislation liv Table of treaties and conventions lvii Useful websites lx 1 Introduction 1 2 Justification 32 3 The Patent 62 4 Patentable Subject Matter 106 5 Patentable Inventions 165 6 Infringement, Validity and Revocation 205 7 Breach of Confidence 231 8 Copyright Principles, Copyright Works and Related Rights 278 9 The Subsistence and Substance of Copyright and Related Rights 332 10 Infringement of Copyright and Defences 359 11 Employing Copyright: Permitted Copyright uses, Dealings in Works and Competition 404 12 Moral Rights 447 13 Design Rights 470 14 Passing Off 537 15 Registered Trade Marks 577 16 Trade Mark Infringement and Challenges to Trade Marks 645 17 Property and Dealings in Marks and Domain Name Disputes 700 18 Image Protection 733 19 Enforcement 772 Index 819 Detailed Contents Preface xiv Table of cases xvi Table of statutes xlii Table of statutory instruments lii Table of EU legislation liv Table of treaties and conventions lvii Useful websites lx 1 INTRODUCTION 1 Introduction 2 1.1 Protection for Ideas 3 1.2 Means for Protecting Ideas 3 1.3 Sources of Intellectual Property Law 7 1.4 Intellectual Property Rights and Free Movement 13 1.5 Intellectual Property and Competition Law and Policy 20 1.6 Other Impacts of EU Law on National Intellectual Property Laws 29 1.7 Harmonisation Directives and EU-wide Rights 29 2 JUSTIFICATION 32 Introduction 33 2.1 The Nature of Exclusive Rights 35 2.2 An Alternative Approach: Unfair Competition 40 2.3 Justifications 44 2.4 Justifications for Patents 47 2.5 Justifications for Copyright 52 2.6 Trade Marks 56 3 THE PATENT 62 Introduction 63 3.1 The Development of Patents 63 3.2 Patent Terminology 68 3.3 Patents Act 1977 69 3.4 Application for a Patent 71 3.5 Ownership of the Patent 76 3.6 The Compensation Scheme 81 3.7 The Proprietary Right 87 viii DETAILED CONTENTS 3.8 Patent Licences 88 3.9 Patents and Free Movement 90 3.10 Patents and Competition Law 91 4 PATENTABLE SUBJECT MATTER 106 Introduction 107 4.1 Inventions 107 4.2 Excluded Categories 110 4.3 Computer Programs 112 4.4 Discoveries and Mathematical Methods 126 4.5 Schemes, Rules and Methods 129 4.6 Presentations of Information 133 4.7 Aesthetic Creations 133 4.8 Exclusions on the Ground of Morality and Public Policy 133 4.9 Biological Inventions 144 4.10 Medical Inventions 152 5 PATENTABLE INVENTIONS 165 Introduction 166 5.1 Novelty 166 5.2 Inventive Step 185 5.3 Industrial Application 195 5.4 Disclosure 198 6 INFRINGEMENT, VALIDITY AND REVOCATION 205 Introduction 206 6.1 Construction of Claims 206 6.2 Infringing Acts 218 6.3 Defences 224 6.4 Revocation and Opposition 228 6.5 Non-binding Opinions as to Validity by the Patent Office 229 7 BREACH OF CONFIDENCE 231 Introduction 232 7.1 The Juridical Basis of the Action 232 7.2 Development of the Action 234 7.3 The Conditions for a Remedy 234 7.4 Information 235 7.5 Confidentiality of Information 240 7.6 Residual Confidentiality in Published Information 245 DETAILED CONTENTS ix 7.7 The Obligation of Confidence 250 7.8 The Direct Recipient – Express Obligations 251 7.9 The Indirect Recipient 258 7.10 No Relationship 260 7.11 Breach 264 7.12 Defences 267 7.13 Public Interest 268 7.14 Remedies 272 8 COPYRIGHT PRINCIPLES, COPYRIGHT WORKS AND RELATED RIGHTS 278 Introduction 279 8.1 The Development of Copyright 279 8.2 Basic Principles 285 8.3 Copyright Works 290 8.4 Original Works 291 8.5 Literary Works 298 8.6 Dramatic Works 300 8.7 Musical Works 303 8.8 Artistic Works 305 8.9 Derivative Works 312 8.10 Related Rights 316 8.11 Unoriginal Databases 317 8.12 Rights for Performers in Performances 325 9 THE SUBSISTENCE AND SUBSTANCE OF COPYRIGHT AND RELATED RIGHTS 332 Introduction 333 9.1 Qualification 333 9.2 Authorship 336 9.3 Ownership of Copyright 340 9.4 Duration of Copyright 346 9.5 Refusal of Copyright 350 9.6 The Exclusive Rights 351 9.7 Droit de Suite 356 9.8 Public Lending Right 357 10 INFRINGEMENT OF COPYRIGHT AND DEFENCES 359 Introduction 360 10.1 Primary Infringement 360 10.2 Authorising Infringement 375 x DETAILED CONTENTS 10.3 Infringement of Secondary Works 386 10.4 Secondary Infringement 386 10.5 Protection for Technological Measures 389 10.6 Protection for Electronic Rights Management 393 10.7 Offences 394 10.8 Defences 396 11 EMPLOYING COPYRIGHT: PERMITTED COPYRIGHT USES, DEALINGS IN WORKS AND COMPETITION 404 Introduction 405 11.1 Permitted Acts 405 11.2 Fair Dealing 407 11.3 Incidental Inclusion 416 11.4 Home Copying 417 11.5 The Internet 419 11.6 News and Media 422 11.7 Educational Copying and Libraries 423 11.8 Computer Programs 425 11.9 Other Permitted Acts 426 11.10 Copyright (Visually Impaired Persons) Act 2002 426 11.11 Dealing with Copyright 427 11.12 Collective Licensing and the Copyright Tribunal 430 11.13 The Copyright Tribunal 431 11.14 Copyright and Competition Law 432 11.15 Copyright and Free Movement 442 12 MORAL RIGHTS 447 Introduction 448 12.1 The Background 448 12.2 The UK before the CDPA 1988 450 12.3 The CDPA 1988 453 12.4 The Right of Paternity 455 12.5 Right of Integrity 458 12.6 The Right against False Attribution 463 12.7 The Right to Privacy 464 12.8 Waiver of Rights 465 12.9 Commentary 467 13 DESIGN RIGHTS 470 Introduction 471 13.1 Design 471 DETAILED CONTENTS xi 13.2 Copyright and Design 475 13.3 UK Registered Design Right 480 13.4 The Old Law 483 13.5 The New Law 491 13.6 UK Unregistered Design Right 509 13.7 Community Designs 525 13.8 Registered Community Design 529 13.9 Unregistered Community Design Right 533 13.10 Design Rights and Competition Law 535 14 PASSING OFF 537 Introduction 538 14.1 The Relationship of Passing Off to Registration for Trade Marks 538 14.2 The Development and Definition of Passing Off 539 14.3 Reputation 545 14.4 Goodwill 546 14.5 Coincidence of Reputation and Goodwill 549 14.6 Misrepresentation 555 14.7 Damage 567 14.8 Lookalike Products 573 15 REGISTERED TRADE MARKS 577 Introduction 578 15.1 Trade Marks 579 15.2 Registration of a Mark 586 15.3 The Definition of a Trade Mark 592 15.4 The Absolute Grounds of Refusal 604 15.5 Not a Trade Mark 608 15.6 Non-Distinctive
Recommended publications
  • Digital Opportunity: a Review of Intellectual Property and Growth
    Digital Opportunity A Review of Intellectual Property and Growth An Independent Report by Professor Ian Hargreaves May 2011 Contents Page Foreword by Ian Hargreaves 01 Executive Summary 03 Chapter 1 Intellectual Property and Growth 10 Chapter 2 The Evidence Base 16 Chapter 3 The International Context 21 Chapter 4 Copyright Licensing: a Moment of Opportunity 26 Chapter 5 Copyright: Exceptions for the Digital Age 41 Chapter 6 Patents 53 Chapter 7 Designs 64 Chapter 8 Enforcement and Disputes 67 Chapter 9 SMEs and the IP Framework 86 Chapter 10 An Adaptive IP Framework 91 Chapter 11 Impact 97 Annex A Terms of Reference 101 Annex B Stakeholders Met during Review of IP and Growth 102 Annex C Call for Evidence Submissions 105 Annex D List of Supporting Documents 109 Foreword When the Prime Minister commissioned this review in November 2010, he did so in terms which some considered provocative. The Review was needed, the PM said, because of the risk that the current intellectual property framework might not be sufficiently well designed to promote innovation and growth in the UK economy. In the five months we have had to compile the Review, we have sought never to lose sight of David Cameron’s “exam question”. Could it be true that laws designed more than three centuries ago with the express purpose of creating economic incentives for innovation by protecting creators’ rights are today obstructing innovation and economic growth? The short answer is: yes. We have found that the UK’s intellectual property framework, especially with regard to copyright, is falling behind what is needed.
    [Show full text]
  • IP Federation Review 2020 REVIEW Formerly Trends and Events, ISSN 2046-3049
    IP Federation 1 | IP Federation Review 2020 REVIEW Formerly Trends and Events, ISSN 2046-3049 www.ipfederation.com DECEMBER | 2020 Improving the intellectual property framework to meet the needs of innovative industry for a century Rising to the challenge… IP Federation members have stepped up to the plate to share their most valuable IP to help combat COVID-19 | P10 100 Artificial Intelligence and years Intellectual Property Fourth industrial revolution technology and its interplay with IP Federation’s centenary year | P14 the IP system | P40 2 | IP Federation Review 2020 Advancing industry’s view on intellectual property since 1920 The IP Federation was founded in 1920 as the Trade Marks, Patents and Designs Federation (TMPDF) in order to coordinate the views of industry and commerce in the United Kingdom, and to make representations to the appropriate authorities on policy and practice in intellectual property (IP) matters. AIMS ACTIVITIES The IP Federation’s aim is to bring about The IP Federation initiates proposals and improvements in the protection afforded by follows developments at national, European intellectual property rights throughout the world, and international levels across all fields of to the advantage of inventors, manufacturers and intellectual property. It has a close relationship consumers alike. Today the Federation has over with the Confederation of British Industry 40 IP-intensive member companies operating (CBI) and provides professional input on in a wide range of sectors and product groups, intellectual property matters to the CBI, as among which are many of the largest companies well as representing it in certain meetings in the UK, as well as smaller companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Journals House of Lords
    977607FCOV PPSysB Page 1 06-10-05 18:32:09 Layout: COVERS Unit: PAG3 JOURNALS OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS SESSION 2003-04 VOLUME 237 LAID ON THE TABLE BY THE CLERK OF THE PARLIAMENTS PRINTED BY ORDER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS BY THE CONTROLLER OF HER MAJESTY’S STATIONERY OFFICE 9776079000 13-10-05 13:36:25 Table: LJOIND PPSysB Unit: PAG1 2003–04 911 GENERAL INDEX See also Judicial Index and Membership of the House, below Abbreviations: Finding aids: 1a;2a;3a First, second, third readings AFFIRMATIVE INSTRUMENTS CWH Committee of the Whole House COMMITTEES DPRRC Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform DIVISIONS Committee GRAND COMMITTEE GC Grand Committee MOTIONS (including motions to HC House of Commons annul (“Prayers”)) HL House of Lords “PING-PONG” HM Her Majesty PRE-LEGISLATIVE SCRUTINY JCCB Joint Committee on Consolidation Bills PRIVATE BILLS JCHR Joint Committee on Human Rights PUBLIC BILLS RA Royal Assent SPECIAL PROCEDURE ORDERS SO Standing Order UNSTARRED QUESTIONS UBC Unopposed Bill Committee Abortion: Reports: Unstarred question, 16 Mar, 261. 1st (Smoking Policy in the House of Lords), 16 Nov, 875. ccess to justice A : Adolescent Health: Motion for papers, after debate, withdrawn, Unstarred question, 15 Jun, 508. 16 Jun, 515. Adoption Act 1976: Access to Justice Act 1999: Papers (per Act): 5 Feb, 154; 19 Apr, 363; 7 Papers (per Act): 9 Mar, 237; 29 Mar, 320; 26 Sep, 671. Apr, 385; 20 Jul, 651; 7 Sep, 672; 9 Nov, 841. Affirmative Instruments: [Hybrid instruments are marked *. Regulatory Acquisition of Land Act 1981: reform orders are not included] See Papers (per Act): 11 Oct, 726.
    [Show full text]
  • The Patents Act 1977 (As Amended)
    The Patents Act 1977 (as amended) An unofficial consolidation produced by Patents Legal Section 1 October 2013 Intellectual Property Office is an operating name of the Patent Office Note to users This is an unofficial consolidation of the Patents Act 1977, as amended up to and including 1 October 2013. This consolidation therefore includes (amongst other changes) the amendments to the 1977 Act made by: the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 the Patents and Trade Marks (World Trade Organisation) Regulations 1999 the Patents Regulations 2000 the Enterprise Act 2002 the Regulatory Reform (Patents) Order 2004 the Patents Act 2004, the Medicines (Marketing Authorisations etc.) Amendment Regulations 2005 the Intellectual Property (Enforcement, etc.) Regulations 2006 the Patents (Compulsory Licensing and Supplementary Protection Certificates) Regulations 2007 the Legal Services Act 2007 the Patents Act 1977 (Amendment) Regulations 2011, and the Crime and Courts Act 2013 In some cases, the amending legislation applies transitional provisions to the changes made to the 1977 Act. It is particularly important to be aware of these transitional provisions in the case of the changes made by the Regulatory Reform (Patents) Order 2004 and by certain provisions of the Patents Act 2004. A number of the repealed provisions of the 1977 Act have been re-enacted or replaced by new provisions of that Act or by provisions in other legislation. Some wording of the 1977 Act has been ‘modified in effect’ by other pieces of legislation, although not actually amended, and footnotes show where this is the case. The Manual of Patent Practice should be consulted for more guidance on all these matters.
    [Show full text]
  • Patents Act 1977 Is up to Date with All Changes Known to Be in Force on Or Before 19 August 2021
    Status: This version of this Act contains provisions that are prospective. Changes to legislation: Patents Act 1977 is up to date with all changes known to be in force on or before 19 August 2021. There are changes that may be brought into force at a future date. Changes that have been made appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) View outstanding changes Patents Act 1977 1977 CHAPTER 37 An Act to establish a new law of patents applicable to future patents and applications for patents; to amend the law of patents applicable to existing patents and applications for patents; to give effect to certain international conventions on patents; and for connected purposes. [29th July 1977] Extent Information E1 This Act does not extend to the Channel Islands or the Colonies for extent provision see s. 132(2) Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act extended (with modifications) (2.1.1993) by S.I. 1992/3091, reg.5 Act extended (8.2.1997) by S.I. 1996/3120, reg. 5 Act applied (8.2.1997) by S.I. 1997/64, rule 9 Act extended (1.3.2002) by The Patents and Plant Variety Rights (Compulsory Licensing) Regulations 2002 (S.I. 2002/247), reg. 26(1) (subject to reg. 26(2)(3)) C2 Act modified (10.6.2003) by Patents Act 1977 (Isle of Man) Order 2003 (S.I. 2003/1249), arts. 2, 3, Sch. C3 Act modified (Isle of Man) (11.11.2013) by The Patents (Isle of Man) Order 2013 (S.I.
    [Show full text]
  • Patents, Trade Marks and Design Rights: Groundless Threats Law Commission Patents, Trade Marks and Design Rights: Groundless Threats Law Com No 346
    Patents, Trade Marks and Design Rights: Groundless Threats Law Commission Patents, Trade Marks and Design Rights: Groundless Threats Marks and Design Rights: Groundless Patents, Trade Law Com No 346 Law Com No 346 39750 Cm 8851 Cover.indd 1 04/04/2014 17:25 The Law Commission (LAW COM No 346) PATENTS, TRADE MARKS AND DESIGN RIGHTS: GROUNDLESS THREATS Presented to Parliament by the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice by Command of Her Majesty April 2014 Cm 8851 © Crown copyright 2014 You may re-use this information (excluding logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence v.2. To view this licence visit www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/2/ or email [email protected] Where third party material has been identified, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. This publication is available at www.gov.uk/government/publications Print ISBN 9781474101974 Web ISBN 9781474101981 Printed in the UK by the Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office ID 04041402 39750 04/14 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fibre content minimum ii THE LAW COMMISSION The Law Commission was set up by the Law Commissions Act 1965 for the purpose of promoting the reform of the law. The Law Commissioners are: The Right Honourable Lord Justice Lloyd Jones, Chairman Professor Elizabeth Cooke David Hertzell Professor David Ormerod QC Nicholas Paines QC The Chief Executive of the Law Commission is Elaine Lorimer. The Law Commission is located at 1st Floor, Tower, 52 Queen Anne’s Gate, London SW1H 9AG.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 No. 2602 PATENTS the Patents
    Certified copy from legislation.gov.uk Publishing STATUTORY INSTRUMENTS 2013 No. 2602 PATENTS The Patents (Isle of Man) Order 2013 Made - - - - 9th October 2013 Laid before Parliament 16th October 2013 Coming into force - - 11th November 2013 At the Court at Buckingham Palace, the 9th day of October 2013 Present, The Queen’s Most Excellent Majesty in Council Her Majesty, in exercise of the powers conferred upon Her by sections 124(3) and 132(2) of the Patents Act 1977(a), is pleased, by and with the advice of Her Privy Council, to make the following Order: Citation and commencement 1. This Order may be cited as the Patents (Isle of Man) Order 2013 and shall come into force on 11th November 2013. Modification of the Patents Act 1977 in its application to the Isle of Man 2. The Patents Act 1977 shall, in its application to the Isle of Man, have effect subject to the modifications specified in the Schedule to this Order. Revocation 3. The Patents Act 1977 (Isle of Man) Order 2003( b) is revoked. Richard Tilbrook Clerk of the Privy Council (a) 1977 c.37. (b) S.I. 2003/1249. Certified copy from legislation.gov.uk Publishing SCHEDULE Article 2 Modifications of the Patents Act 1977 in its application to the Isle of Man 1. References to the Crown shall be construed as including the Crown in right of the Government of the Isle of Man. 2. —(1) References to an Act of Parliament (including the Patents Act 1977) or to a provision of such an Act shall be construed as references to that Act or provision as it has effect in the Isle of Man.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Review on Industrial Design Protection in Europe
    Legal review on industrial design protection in Europe Under the contract with the Directorate General Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs (MARKT2014/083/D) Legal review on industrial design protection in Europe Final Report - 15 April 2016 EN This study was carried out for the European Commission by For further information on this report, please contact: Mr. Jos Dumortier time.lex - information & technology law 35 rue du Congrès B-1000 Brussels - Belgium M: +32 477 33 82 96 [email protected] www.timelex.eu Core Team: Prof Jos Dumortier time.lex Davide Parrilli time.lex Prof Uma Suthersanen Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute, Queen Mary, London Honorary Prof David Musker Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute, Queen Mary, London; Consultant, Jenkins Patricia Ypma Spark Legal Network Peter McNally Spark Legal Network Jasmine Simpson Spark Legal Network Dr Lena Boucon Spark Legal Network Jo Steyaert Indiville Wouter Samyn Indiville Country Experts: Prof Clemens Appl Austria Vienna University of Economics and Business Susie P. Arnesen Denmark Løje, Arnesen & Meedom Prof Mario Franzosi Italy Avvocati Associati Franzosi Dal Negro Setti Prof Ignacio Garrote Spain Autonomous University of Madrid Prof Christophe Geiger, France CEIPI, University of Strasbourg Natalia Kapyrina Prof Pavel Koukal Czech Republic Masaryk University Dr Ewa Laskowska Poland Jagiellonian University Prof Marianne Levin Sweden Stockholm University Dr Vytautas Mizaras Lithuania Valiunas Ellex Mark Pohar Slovenia - Dr Ana Ramalho Portugal Maastricht University Allard Ringnalda Netherlands Klos cs Dr Dharamveer Singh Chauhan Luxembourg VP Fund Solutions (Luxembourg) SA Prof Guido Westkamp, Germany Queen Mary Intellectual Property Dr Marc Mimler Research Institute, Queen Mary, London DISCLAIMER The information and views set out in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Guide to Legal Citation, Third Edition
    AUSTRALIAN GUIDE TO LEGAL AUSTRALIAN CITATION AUST GUIDE TO LEGAL CITA AUSTRALIAN GUIDE TO TO LEGAL CITATION AUSTRALIAN GUIDE TO LEGALA CITUSTRATION ALIAN Third Edition GUIDE TO LEGAL CITATION AGLC3 - Front Cover 4 (MJ) - CS4.indd 1 21/04/2010 12:32:24 PM AUSTRALIAN GUIDE TO LEGAL CITATION Third Edition Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc in collaboration with Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc Melbourne 2010 Published and distributed by the Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc in collaboration with the Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Australian guide to legal citation / Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc., Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc. 3rd ed. ISBN 9780646527390 (pbk.). Bibliography. Includes index. Citation of legal authorities - Australia - Handbooks, manuals, etc. Melbourne University Law Review Association Melbourne Journal of International Law 808.06634 First edition 1998 Second edition 2002 Third edition 2010 Reprinted 2010, 2011 (with minor corrections), 2012 (with minor corrections) Published by: Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc Reg No A0017345F · ABN 21 447 204 764 Melbourne University Law Review Telephone: (+61 3) 8344 6593 Melbourne Law School Facsimile: (+61 3) 9347 8087 The University of Melbourne Email: <[email protected]> Victoria 3010 Australia Internet: <http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/mulr> Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc Reg No A0046334D · ABN 86 930 725 641 Melbourne Journal of International Law Telephone: (+61 3) 8344 7913 Melbourne Law School Facsimile: (+61 3) 8344 9774 The University of Melbourne Email: <[email protected]> Victoria 3010 Australia Internet: <http://www.law.unimelb.edu.au/mjil> © 2010 Melbourne University Law Review Association Inc and Melbourne Journal of International Law Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Restructuring Intellectual Property Jurisdictions Post-Brexit: Strategic Considerations for the EU and Britain Alexandra George
    Brooklyn Journal of International Law Volume 43 | Issue 1 Article 27 12-12-2017 Restructuring Intellectual Property Jurisdictions Post-Brexit: Strategic Considerations for the EU and Britain Alexandra George Follow this and additional works at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil Part of the European Law Commons, Intellectual Property Law Commons, International Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Jurisdiction Commons, Law and Politics Commons, and the Transnational Law Commons Recommended Citation Alexandra George, Restructuring Intellectual Property Jurisdictions Post-Brexit: Strategic Considerations for the EU and Britain, 43 Brook. J. Int'l L. 131 (2017). Available at: https://brooklynworks.brooklaw.edu/bjil/vol43/iss1/27 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at BrooklynWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brooklyn Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of BrooklynWorks. RESTRUCTURING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY JURISDICTION POST- BREXIT: STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION AND BRITAIN Alexandra George* INTRODUCTION ........................................................................ 132 I. TERMINOLOGY AND ASSESSING OUTCOMES: A HARD OR SOFT BREXIT?................................................................................... 138 II. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS AFFECTING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW-MAKING IN EUROPE....................................... 140 ". TBF 6J.+F .D ‘I/&F>>FJ&%_> 8(.+F(&Z’ ................................ 141 B. Territorial Rights
    [Show full text]
  • IP Federation Submissions on Draft UPC Legislation
    Policy Paper PP09/14 IP Federation submissions on draft UPC legislation Introduction The IP Federation represents IP intensive companies in the United Kingdom – a list of members is attached. Our member companies are extensively in- volved with IP in Europe and internationally. Not only do our companies own considerable numbers of IP rights, both in Europe and elsewhere, but they are affected by the activities and IP rights of competitors. They may be either claimants or defendants in IP related court actions, here and elsewhere. The consultation On 10 June 2014, the IPO launched a consultation comprising a Technical Review and Call for Evidence on Secondary legislation implementing the Agreement on a Unified Patent Court (UPC) and EU Regulations establishing the Unitary Patent. Responses and questions about policy issues raised in the document have been requested by the IPO’s UPC Taskforce by 2 September 2014. IP Federation response Before addressing the 20 individual questions in the consultation document, the IP Federation would like to make some generalised remarks on the following topics. 1. JURISDICTION a. Bringing national law into line with the UPC b. Transitional provisions – interpretation of Article 83 UPCA (see Annex) c. Jurisdiction of UK IPO d. Technical drafting issues 2. UNITARY PATENT a. Threats provisions b. Double patenting 3. INFRINGEMENT a. Software interoperability – Article 27(k) UPCA 1. JURISDICTION 1a. National law harmonisation with UPC law The IP Federation realises there is a logic in bringing UK infringement law into line with UPC infringement law, so that the UK Courts are applying the same infringement provisions as the UPC and no advantage could be sought Registered Office 5th floor, 63-66 Hatton Garden, London EC1N 8LE Email: [email protected] | Tel: 020 72423923 | Fax: 020 72423924 | Web: www.ipfederation.com Limited by guarantee Registered company no: 166772 Page 2 of 18 by litigants choosing one forum or another where options may exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Patents Act 2004 (C.16) Which Received Royal Assent on 22Nd July 2004
    These notes refer to the Patents Act 2004 (c.16) which received Royal Assent on 22nd July 2004 PATENTS ACT 2004 —————————— EXPLANATORY NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. These explanatory notes relate to the Patents Act 2004 which received Royal Assent on 22nd July 2004. They have been prepared by the Department of Trade and Industry in order to assist the reader in understanding the Act. They do not form part of the Act and have not been endorsed by Parliament. 2. The notes need to be read in conjunction with the Act. They are not, and are not meant to be, a comprehensive description of the Act. So where a section or part of a section does not seem to require any explanation or comment, none is given. SUMMARY 3. This Act amends the Patents Act 1977 (“the 1977 Act”), which is the statute governing the patents system in the UK. The purpose of the Act is three-fold. Firstly, it is intended to bring the UK patents system into line with the revised European Patent Convention which was agreed by Diplomatic Conference in November 2000. Secondly, it introduces into the 1977 Act some measures designed to assist in the enforcement of patent rights and in the resolution of patent disputes between patent proprietors and third parties. Thirdly, it updates the 1977 Act. BACKGROUND The European Patent Convention 4. The 1977 Act reformed the law of patents in the UK. One of its main purposes was to bring into effect in the UK the European Patent Convention (“EPC”), which was a new European-wide patents treaty agreed in 1973.
    [Show full text]