DOCSLIB.ORG

2019 Safety and Security Policy Manual

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2019 Safety and Security Policy Manual 2019 Report Year NNationalT TransitD Database Safety & Security Reporting Manual Office of Budget and Policy January 2019 Federal Transit Administration U.S. Department of Transportation 2019 Safety and Security Policy Manual Table of Contents List of Exhibits ............................................................................................................. iii List of Examples ........................................................................................................... iv 2019 Policy Clarifications ............................................................................................. 5 Reporting Clarifications................................................................................................ 5 Form/Field Changes .................................................................................................... 5 Introduction: The National Transit Database .............................................................. 6 History ......................................................................................................................... 6 Legislative Requirements ............................................................................................ 6 Public Transportation ................................................................................................... 7 Public Transit Modes ................................................................................................ 8 Types of Service (TOS) ............................................................................................ 9 Reporting Requirements ............................................................................................ 10 Who Reports .............................................................................................................. 10 Reporting Overview ................................................................................................... 11 When to Report ......................................................................................................... 11 Where to Report ........................................................................................................ 13 Failure to Report, Late Reports, or Incomplete Reports ............................................ 13 S&S-20: CEO Certification .......................................................................................... 14 S&S-30: Security Configuration ................................................................................. 15 Overview .................................................................................................................... 15 Primary Security Configuration .................................................................................. 16 Secondary Security Configuration ............................................................................. 16 Personnel Totals ........................................................................................................ 16 S&S-40: Major Event Report ....................................................................................... 20 Overview .................................................................................................................... 20 Multi-Agency Facilities ........................................................................................... 21 Table of Contents – i 2019 Safety and Security Policy Manual Predominant Use ................................................................................................... 21 Event Types ............................................................................................................... 21 Major Event Thresholds ............................................................................................. 26 Fatality.................................................................................................................... 26 Injury ...................................................................................................................... 26 Property Damage ................................................................................................... 28 Evacuation ............................................................................................................. 30 Derailment .............................................................................................................. 31 Collisions Involving Tow-aways .............................................................................. 31 Automatically Reportable Rail Collisions ................................................................ 32 Runaway Trains ..................................................................................................... 33 Types of Major Events ............................................................................................... 33 Collisions ................................................................................................................ 33 Basic Information Screen Key Descriptions ........................................................... 35 Collision Event Information Key Descriptions ......................................................... 35 Collision Information Key Descriptions ................................................................... 38 Collision Transit Involved Key Descriptions ............................................................ 41 Collision Other Vehicle Involved Key Descriptions ................................................. 45 Derailments ............................................................................................................ 45 Derailment Event Information Key Descriptions ..................................................... 46 Derailment Rail Transit Involved Key Descriptions ................................................. 47 Injury and Fatality Type Key Descriptions .............................................................. 47 Fires ....................................................................................................................... 48 Rail Fire Event Details Key Descriptions ................................................................ 49 Hazardous Material Spills....................................................................................... 50 Hazardous Material Spills Event Details Key Descriptions ..................................... 50 Acts of God ............................................................................................................ 51 Act of God Event Details Key Descriptions ............................................................ 51 Security Events ...................................................................................................... 52 ii – Table of Contents 2019 Safety and Security Policy Manual Security Event Details Key Descriptions ................................................................ 52 Security Event Details Key Descriptions ................................................................ 54 Other Safety Events ............................................................................................... 56 Other Event Details Key Descriptions .................................................................... 56 S&S-50: Non-Major Monthly Summary Report ......................................................... 59 Overview .................................................................................................................... 59 Multi-Agency Facilities ........................................................................................... 59 Predominant Use ................................................................................................... 59 Number of Other Safety Occurrences Not Otherwise Classified and Number Other Safety Incidents ......................................................................................................... 60 Number of Other Safety Occurrences or Safety Incidents Key Descriptions .......... 61 Number of Non-Major Fires ....................................................................................... 63 Number of Non-Major Fire Events Key Descriptions .............................................. 63 Appendix A: Vehicle Manufacturers.........................................................................A-1 Appendix B: Vehicle Fuel Types...............................................................................B-1 List of Exhibits Exhibit 1: Public Transportation ....................................................................................... 7 Exhibit 2: Rail and Non-Rail Modes ................................................................................. 8 Exhibit 3: Summary of NTD Safety and Security Reporting Requirements ................... 11 Exhibit 4: NTD Safety and Security Reporting Timeline ................................................ 12 Exhibit 5: Security Configuration Types......................................................................... 15 Exhibit 6: Event Types ................................................................................................... 22 Exhibit 7: Reporting Thresholds .................................................................................... 23 Exhibit 8: Collision Impact Point Diagram (Bus and Ferry) ............................................ 43 Table of Contents – iii 2019 Safety and Security Policy Manual List of Examples Example 1: Calculating Personnel Totals ...............................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View CSRM Railroad Equipment Roster
    California State Railroad Museum Railroad Equipment Roster Old Sacramento SHP (Sacramento Southern Railroad) Railroad, Number, Name Type Builder Date Notes Locomotive Roster Steam Locomotives Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe 5 Little Buttercup 0-4-0 Baldwin 1899 SantEx-0-4-0T a Fe Terminal 1, AT&SF 2419; rebuilt as 0-4-0 and operated 1949 at Chicago R.R. Fair. Gift 3/1986 from AT&SF. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe 1010 2-6-2 Baldwin 1901 Pulled 1905 Death Valley Scotty Special. Gift 10/1984 from AT&SF. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe 2925 4-8-4 Baldwin 1944 Gift 3/1986 from AT&SF. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe 5021 2-10-4 Baldwin 1944 Gift 3/1986 from AT&SF. Central Pacific4-4-0 1 Gov. Stanford R. Norris 1862 Last operated 1/1895. Loaned 1981 by Leland Stanford Junior University. Restored by CSRM to 1899 appearance. Central Pacific 233 2-6-2T CP, Sacto Shops 1882 Built for East Bay suburban service. Later CP 1504, SP 1903. One of two surviving 19th century locomotives built in CP Sacto shops. Gift 12/2001 from Pacific Locomotive Assn. Granite Rock 10 0-6-0ST Porter 1942 Ex-US Army 5001. Gift 9/95 from Granite Rock Company; restored 1997 by Granite Rock and CSRM. In service. Kiso Forest Ry 6 (36” gauge) 0- 4-2T Baldwin 1929 Originally 30” gauge, Kiso Forest 17, 9. Gift 2004 from Henry Sorensen family. Operable. Revised: 1/10/07 1 Printed: 03/01/07 Railroad, Number, Name Type Builder Date Notes Mattole Lumber Co. 1 (36” gauge) 0-4-2T Vulcan 1908 Reboilered in 1960s.
    [Show full text]
  • RR-564 Part 2
    -------~---- -----~ __ _...: ___ ~--".~· ·~· ~~· ~··_ _:__~·~·~----~. 94" I _::\ 'r-'( 1~\ 107'' D 0 0 "" 0 0 00 O_Q JJJJ lUl t«--------125"------»t 1---------2105''----------""'1 Figure 28. TYPICAL EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS FOR A 12 PASSENGER SMALL BUS. / / 7 Wheel -------- f--1 36" Chair r -~ L ( ) .--- f_j 1\. \. '- 485'' '-- '-- 1~" 86" 129" I/ / 3b" --------- Lift \.. \.. r '/'/ I / / I I Wheel Lr- -------- Chair 1---' r -~ 45" L ,--- ,---- \.. (~ '-- '-- Wheel I/ / Chair ---· 30"-- Lift \.'\. \.. t Figure 29. TYPICALINTERIORDIMENSIONSANDSEATING ARRANGEMENTS FOR A 12 PASSENGER SMALL BUS. 52 90"==:1 £ _"'\ JUOI JQUl BBBB 64" 79" 0 D 0 (QQ] "'"\ 107" IOOI 50"-~---+ 1+24"~ \ ,__, ~ . ~ lJ1 I~ lr'l ~ 1 w ,.. ... - 76" -: 163" ' 262" Figure 30. TYPICAL EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS FOR A 20 PASSENGER SMALL BUS. c::::J =aCJ ··I- ······· 36" 86" 186" 14" ... I- . ..... 36" I,P" II = c::§bo Wheel Wheel ·- " ...... Chair Chair oo Jl Jl :·- '' ..... ·-· : Lift ?"'" Figure 31. TYPICAL INTERIOR DIMENSIONS AND SEATING ARRANGEMENTS FOR A 20 PASSENGER SMALL BUS. 54 TABLE 17 DIMENSIONS FOR VANS, MODIFIED VANS AND SMALL BUSES (1980 VEHICLES) Overall Vans Modified vans Small Buses Length (ins) 178 - 227 220 - 227 233 - 280 Width (ins) 80 80 - 94.5 80 96 Height (ins) 80 - 84 101 - ll5* 93.5 - ll7 Interior Length (ins)** 91 - 137 131 - 137 130 - 220 Width (ins) 69 - 71 69 - 82 79 90 Headroom (ins) 52 - 54 64 - 74 63 78 GVW (lbs) 6,050 - 8,550 9,000 10,250 - 18,000 Wheelbase (ins) llO - 138 127 - 138 125 - 167 Seating Capacity 5 - 15 9 - 16 12 22 *Higher value generally indicates the addition of air conditioning mounted on the roof.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stepped Hull Hybrid Hydrofoil
    The Stepped Hull Hybrid Hydrofoil Christopher D. Barry, Bryan Duffty Planing @brid hydrofoils or partially hydrofoil supported planing boat are hydrofoils that intentionally operate in what would be the takeoff condition for a norma[ hydrofoil. They ofler a compromise ofperformance and cost that might be appropriate for ferq missions. The stepped hybrid configuration has made appearances in the high speed boat scene as early as 1938. It is a solution to the problems of instability and inefficiency that has limited other type of hybrids. It can be configured to have good seakeeping as well, but the concept has not been used as widely as would be justified by its merits. The purpose of this paper is to reintroduce this concept to the marine community, particularly for small, fast ferries. We have performed analytic studies, simple model experiments and manned experiments, andfiom them have determined some specljic problems and issues for the practical implementation of this concept. This paper presents background information, discusses key concepts including resistance, stability, seakeeping, and propulsion and suggests solutions to what we believe are the problems that have limited the widespread acceptance of this concept. Finally we propose a “strawman” design for a ferry in a particular service using this technology. BACKGROUND Partially hydrofoil supported planing hulls mix hydrofoil support and planing lift. The most obvious A hybrid hydrofoil is a vehicle combining the version of this concept is a planing hull with a dynamic lift of hydrofoils with a significant amount of hydrofoil more or less under the center of gravity. lit? tiom some other source, generally either buoyancy Karafiath (1974) studied this concept and ran model or planing lift.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Powered Hydrofoil Design & Analytic Wing Optimization
    Human Powered Hydrofoil Design & Analytic Wing Optimization Andy Gunkler and Dr. C. Mark Archibald Grove City College Grove City, PA 16127 Email: [email protected] Abstract – Human powered hydrofoil watercraft can have marked performance advantages over displacement-hull craft, but pose significant engineering challenges. The focus of this hydrofoil independent research project was two-fold. First of all, a general vehicle configuration was developed. Secondly, a thorough optimization process was developed for designing lifting foils that are highly efficient over a wide range of speeds. Given a well-defined set of design specifications, such as vehicle weight and desired top speed, an optimal horizontal, non-surface- piercing wing can be engineered. Design variables include foil span, area, planform shape, and airfoil cross section. The optimization begins with analytical expressions of hydrodynamic characteristics such as lift, profile drag, induced drag, surface wave drag, and interference drag. Research of optimization processes developed in the past illuminated instances in which coefficients of lift and drag were assumed to be constant. These shortcuts, made presumably for the sake of simplicity, lead to grossly erroneous regions of calculated drag. The optimization process developed for this study more accurately computes profile drag forces by making use of a variable coefficient of drag which, was found to be a function of the characteristic Reynolds number, required coefficient of lift, and airfoil section. At the desired cruising speed, total drag is minimized while lift is maximized. Next, a strength and rigidity analysis of the foil eliminates designs for which the hydrodynamic parameters produce structurally unsound wings. Incorporating constraints on minimum takeoff speed and power required to stay foil-borne isolates a set of optimized design parameters.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Markers of Washington Township
    Historic Markers of Washington Township Published by Washington Township Historical Society Page 1 Copyright 2019 Washington Township Historical Society Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.0 You are free: - to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work - to make derivative works Under the following conditions: Attribution. You must give the original author credit. Noncommercial. You may not use this work for commercial purposes. Share Alike. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under a license identical to this one. For any reuse or distribution, you must make clear to others the license terms of this work. Any of these conditions can be waived if you get permission from the copyright holder. Your fair use and other rights are in no way affected by the above. Document Date: October 26, 2019 Page 2 Table of Contents Introduction ........ 4 Historical Groups ........ 5 Fremont Aqua Caliente ........ 7 Ardenwood Historic Farm / George Washington Patterson Ranch Marker ........ 8 The Bankers Building ........ 9 Bill Ball Plaza ........ 10 Centerville Presbyterian ........ 11 The Chadbourne Carriage House ........ 12 Completion of the Transcontinental Railroad ........ 13 Country Club of Washington Township Women's Club ........ 14 De Anza Expedition 1775 - 1776 ........ 15 Erhman General Store ........ 16 Essanay Studio ........ 17 Essanay Studio ........ 18 Henry Curtner Mansion ........ 19 Hiram Davis Property ........ 20 Leal Tank House ........ 21 Leland Stanford Winery ........ 22 Niles Post Office ........ 23 Masonic Lodge ........ 24 Mission Creek Walk Historic Site ........ 25 Mission San Jose ........ 28 Mission San Jose ........ 29 Mission San Jose ........ 30 Mormon Pioneers / Mormon Pioneer Adobes ........ 31 Ohlone Indians ........ 32 Old St. Edwards Church .......
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 Fact Book
    2008 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACT BOOK 59th Edition June 2008 PUBLISHED BY American Public Transportation Association American Public Transportation Association 1666 K Street, N.W., Suite 1100 Washington, DC 20006 TELEPHONE: (202) 496-4800 EMAIL: [email protected] WEBSITE: www.apta.com APTA’s Vision Statement Be the leading force in advancing public transportation. APTA’s Mission Statement APTA serves and leads its diverse membership through advocacy, innovation, and information sharing to strengthen and expand public transportation. APTA’s Policy on Diversity APTA recognizes the importance of diversity for conference topics and speakers and is committed to increasing the awareness of its membership on diversity issues. APTA welcomes ideas and suggestions on how to strengthen its efforts to meet these important diversity objectives. Prepared by John Neff, Senior Policy Researcher [email protected] (202) 496-4812 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION FACT BOOK American Public Transportation Association Washington, DC June 2008 Material from 2008 Public Transportation Fact Book may be quoted or reproduced without obtaining the permission of the American Public Transportation Association. Suggested Identification: American Public Transportation Association: Public Transportation Fact Book, Washington, DC, June, 2008. TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents 28. Fossil Fuel Consumption by Mode…………….. 31 29. Non-diesel Fossil Fuel Consumption by Fuel… 31 INTRODUCTION 30. Bus Power Sources…....................................... 31 31. Bus Fossil Fuel Consumption…………………... 32 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION OVERVIEW…………… 7 32. Paratransit Fuel Consumption………………….. 32 33. Rail Vehicle Fuel and Power Consumption….… 32 NATIONAL SUMMARY………………………….....…… 15 SAFETY………………………...............………..........… 33 1. Number of Public Transportation Service Providers by Mode……………………………… 15 34. Fatality Rates by Mode of Travel, 2001-2003… 33 2.
    [Show full text]
  • You Need to Get to the Airport to Catch a Plane. It's Ten Miles Away, and It's
    You need to get to the airport to catch a plane. It’s ten miles away, and it’s the rush hour. Which do you think is the quickest way of getting there, and why? Choose from the options below. go by bus go by car go by taxi go by train go by motorbike go by bike go on foot Divide these words and phrases into two categories: cars and taxis and buses and trains. get a lift a double decker share a taxi hitchhike take the underground buy a return ticket catch the number 9 use public transport pay the fare put your foot down it’s delayed go on the sleeper miss your connection change at Swindon sit on the top deck a buffet car stuck in a traffic jam get on/off get in/out of a bus lane hail a taxi a taxi rank sit in the passenger seat reserve a first class seat miss the inter city express What’s the difference between the following? a. bus and coach b. train and tram c. helicopter and hovercraft d. passenger and pedestrian e. travel and commute © Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2005 Downloaded from the vocabulary section in www.onestopenglish.com Which word goes with all three sentences in each section? You may need to change the tense of the word: take ride drive catch 1 At the weekend I love to __________ into the country on my bike. We went on a __________ in a helicopter last week. The bus __________ from the airport was very pleasant.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting to Orsa Maggiore Hotel Orsa Maggiore Is Located in Anacapri, the Highest and Most Peaceful Area of the Island of Capri
    How to get to Hotel Orsa Maggiore Getting to Orsa Maggiore Hotel Orsa Maggiore is located in Anacapri, the highest and most peaceful area of the island of Capri. We provide a free shuttle service on arrival and departure , from the port to the hotel and vice versa. Navigational companies: Call us a couple of hours before you are scheduled to arrive on the island, letting us know which ferry or Roma Aliscafi SNAV +39 081 8377577 hydrofoil you are going to take: you’ll find our driver waiting for you at the port. ORSA MAGGIORE Caremar Spa +39 081 8370700 NLG Navigazione Libera del Golfo +39 081 8370819 Phone: +39 081 8373351 Port Authority +39 081 8370226 Capri’s port is a small one and it's not always possible to park vehicles near to the landing docks. When Tourist Information Offices the port is busy, we ask guests to wait for the driver next to the Funicular railway ticket office. +39 081 8370686 Our shuttle service is available from 09.00 until 20.30. Should you decide to arrive or leave early in the Napoli morning or late in the evening, you will need to take a taxi or the bus (Marina Grande-Anacapri). Sorrento Positano Capri Hydrofoils and ferries to Capri depart from Naples and Sorrento. How long will the journey take? In the summer months, sea crossings are also From Rome airport: minimum 3 hours available from Positano, Amalfi, Salerno and (traveling by fast train and without missing a the island of Ischia. single connection) Times of crossings are subject to variation and From Naples airport: 90mins it’s always a good idea to check the hydrofoil From Sorrento: 30mins and ferry schedule before you travel to the port.
    [Show full text]
  • Shore Thing! Boeing to Use Its Rotorcraft Production Expertise in Bid to Supply U.S
    Shore thing! Boeing to use its rotorcraft production expertise in bid to supply U.S. Navy with an advanced hovercraft By Marc Sklar he U.S. Navy’s next ‘air’craft may not take off with the head-snapping speed of PhOTO IlluSTRATION: an F/A-18 Super Hornet leaving the deck of a carrier. But it will still turn heads. The proposed Ship to Shore Flying on a cushion of air just feet above the water and land, this hovercraft, or Connector air cushion vehicle will T transport troops, equipment, air cushion vehicle, will transport troops, equipment, supplies and weapons from ships to supplies and weapons systems to landing zones. The Ship to Shore Connector is the Navy’s proposed replacement for its landing zones for the U.S. Navy. Landing Craft Air Cushion hovercraft that has been operational for more than two decades. BOEING ANd MARINETTE MARINE CORP. Boeing—with its large-scale systems integration expertise, rotorcraft production and product life-cycle support—has teamed with shipbuilder Marinette Marine Corp. to bid for the project. “The Marines and Army forces that will depend on the new craft are incorporating heavier vehicles into their operating units,’’ said Richard McCreary, chief executive of the shipbuilding firm. “They need higher speeds for increased operational tempos, and the ability to perform in even more hostile environments.’’ Carried in the belly of amphibious assault ships, the Ship to Shore Connector will be able to operate independent of tides, water depth, underwater obstacles, ice, mud or beach gradient. Its ability to move over water and land gives it flexibility to be used for everything from beach assaults to humanitarian efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost Evaluation for Nine Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards
    TL DOT HS- 805 320 242 . H3 82 COST EVALUATION FOR NINE FEDERAL v . 6 MOTOR VEHICLE STANDARDS VOLUME VI FMVSS 220, 221, & 222 M. R. Harvey DEPARTMENT of J. A. Lesczhik transportation R. F. McLean 1 4 1980 De Lorean Motor Company JUL 2401 Elliott Street library Troy, Michigan 48084 J Contract No. D0T-HS-8-02015 Contract Amt. $332,007 NOVEMBER 1979 FINAL REPORT This document is available to the U.S. public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 Prepared For U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, D.C. 20590 This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Govern- ment assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. 5 O.’P- T*cImmc«I K fr> P»c——tt«— P /• *' 2. C t»tiw Ac<*l»i*a Mo. 1. i Ho. s.L J)OT-HS-805 320 4pr.»W rnU J. !•>••• £>•*• COST EVALUATION FOR NINE FEDERAL MOTOR VEHICLE NOVEMBER 1979 SAFETY STANDARDS Vol. VI 4. 7«Imm| CWp.. miM Cat* $. —if Of|«w itiiMi B >»•»! Mo. 7 . AvAa/a M.R. GARVEY, J. A. LESCZHIK, R.F. McLEAN *. PwMkt Ot,s>i ukM K«m m* «<»IH 10. U«.l N. (THAIS) DE L0REAN MOTOR COMPANY RESEARCH & ENGINEERING DIVISION 1 I Conflict 04 G'tni N • 2401 ELLIOTT STREET D0T-HS- 8-0201 TROY. MICHIGAN 48084 13. Tjth ol R sport ond P *r«od Cov«r*^ FINAL REPORT DEMT^rOF^^RWlON 10/78 - 11/79 NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION 400 SEVENTH STREET S.W.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Operational Analyses for a New Intercity Transit Service
    Planning and Operational Analyses for A New Intercity Transit Service Item Type text; Electronic Dissertation Authors Ranjbari, Andisheh Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction, presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 25/09/2021 07:58:17 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/630234 PLANNING AND OPERATIONAL ANALYSES FOR A NEW INTERCITY TRANSIT SERVICE By ANDISHEH RANJBARI ________________________ Copyright © Andisheh Ranjbari 2018 A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MECHANICS In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 2018 THE LTNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA GRADUATE COLLEGE As members of the Dissertation Commiuee, we certifu that we have read the dissertation prepared by Andisheh Ranjbari, titled Planning and Operation Analyses for A New Intercity Transit Service and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Date: May 3,2418 Date: May 3,2018 Mark D. Hickman Date: May 3,2018 Neng Fan Date: May 3,2018 Final approval and acceptance of this dissertation is contingent upon the candidate's submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Graduate College. I hereby certiff that I have read this dissertation prepared under my direction and recommend that it be accepted as fulfilling the dissertation requirement.
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 NTD Policy Manual for Reduced Reporters
    Office of Budget and Policy National Transit Database 2019 Policy Manual REDUCED REPORTING 2019 NTD Reduced Reporter Policy Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Exhibits .............................................................................................................. v Acronyms and Abbreviations .................................................................................... vii Report Year 2019 Policy Changes and Reporting Clarifications .............................. 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 6 The National Transit Database ................................................................................... 7 History .................................................................................................................... 7 NTD Data ................................................................................................................ 8 Data Use and Funding .......................................................................................... 11 Failure to Report ................................................................................................... 14 Inaccurate Data .................................................................................................... 15 Standardized Reporting Requirements ..................................................................... 15 Reporting Due Dates ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]