DOCSLIB.ORG

The Postsynaptic Architecture of Excitatory Synapses: a More Quantitative View

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Postsynaptic Architecture of Excitatory Synapses: a More Quantitative View ANRV313-BI76-33 ARI 1 May 2007 19:29 The Postsynaptic Architecture of Excitatory Synapses: A More Quantitative View Morgan Sheng1 and Casper C. Hoogenraad2 1The Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Departments of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, and Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139; email: [email protected] 2Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam 3015GE, The Netherlands; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2007. 76:823–47 Key Words First published online as a Review in Advance on dendritic spine, glutamate receptor, mass spectrometry, December 19, 2006 postsynaptic density, PSD-95 The Annual Review of Biochemistry is online at biochem.annualreviews.org Abstract by SCELC Trial on 03/25/13. For personal use only. This article’s doi: Excitatory (glutamatergic) synapses in the mammalian brain are usu- 10.1146/annurev.biochem.76.060805.160029 ally situated on dendritic spines, a postsynaptic microcompartment Copyright c 2007 by Annual Reviews. that also harbors organelles involved in protein synthesis, membrane All rights reserved trafficking, and calcium metabolism. The postsynaptic membrane Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2007.76:823-847. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org 0066-4154/07/0707-0823$20.00 contains a high concentration of glutamate receptors, associated sig- naling proteins, and cytoskeletal elements, all assembled by a variety of scaffold proteins into an organized structure called the postsynap- tic density (PSD). A complex machine made of hundreds of distinct proteins, the PSD dynamically changes its structure and composi- tion during development and in response to synaptic activity. The molecular size of the PSD and the stoichiometry of many major con- stituents have been recently measured. The structures of some intact PSD proteins, as well as the spatial arrangement of several proteins within the PSD, have been determined at low resolution by electron microscopy. On the basis of such studies, a more quantitative and geometrically realistic view of PSD architecture is emerging. 823 ANRV313-BI76-33 ARI 1 May 2007 19:29 cal depolarization to the postsynaptic neuron Contents (excitatory synaptic transmission). The strength of synaptic transmission can INTRODUCTION................. 824 be modified (synaptic plasticity) by various MICROANATOMY OF THE factors, including specific patterns of synaptic EXCITATORY SYNAPSE ....... 825 activity (1). By altering synaptic strength in Synaptic Cleft .................... 825 an activity-dependent manner, synaptic plas- The Dendritic Spine.............. 827 ticity allows synapses and neural networks to Organelles Within Dendritic store information in response to prior experi- Spines ........................ 828 ence, such as occurs during development and THE POSTSYNAPTIC DENSITY . 829 in learning and memory. In parallel with ad- Biochemical Composition of the justing the strength of synaptic transmission, PSD.......................... 829 neurons can change the morphology of synap- Quantitative View of PSD Protein tic connections and even their physical pat- Composition .................. 831 tern of connectivity (2). Thus information can Three-Dimensional Organization be stored long-term in the brain not only by ofthePSD.................... 835 modulation of synaptic strength but also by Three-Dimensional Structures of the formation of new synapses or the elimina- Individual Postsynaptic tion of existing synapses (2, 3). Molecules ..................... 837 Synaptic transmission and plasticity are Heterogeneity of PSD crucial for all aspects of nervous system func- Composition between Different tion and critical for proper development of Brain Regions and Cell Types. 838 the central nervous system. Normal synap- Turnover of Proteins in the PSD . 839 tic transmission depends on the proper local- Developmental Changes in the ization and arrangement of specific proteins PSD.......................... 839 on both sides of the synapse. Synaptic plas- EXTRASYNAPTIC MEMBRANE . 840 ticity is mediated by changes in the molecu- CONCLUDING REMARKS ....... 841 lar composition of synapses and in chemical modification of synaptic proteins. Pathologi- cal synapse development and/or function al- most certainly contribute to many neuropsy- by SCELC Trial on 03/25/13. For personal use only. chiatric disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, autism, INTRODUCTION mental retardation), common neurodegener- The billions of neurons in the mammalian ative diseases (e.g., Alzheimer’s disease), and Dendrite: the branched projections brain communicate with each other via spe- stroke (4, 5). Therefore, it is of fundamental Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2007.76:823-847. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org of a neuron that cialized junctions called synapses. The vast and clinical importance to understand the bio- receive synaptic majority of these synapses occur at contacts chemical and cell biological basis of synaptic inputs conveyed by between presynaptic axons and postsynaptic function and plasticity. axons from other dendrites, and they use glutamate as the exci- We review the molecular and cellular ar- neurons tatory neurotransmitter. Glutamate released chitecture of the postsynaptic specialization of AMPA receptor from the presynaptic terminal acts upon post- glutamatergic (glutamate-releasing) synapses, (AMPAR): glutamate receptor synaptic glutamate receptor channels [primar- which make up the vast majority of cen- channel that ily AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4- tral synapses in mammalian brain. Not cov- mediates most of the isoxazolepropionic acid) receptors (AMPARs) ered are other types of excitatory synapses fast synaptic and NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartic acid) re- (e.g., those using acetylcholine) and inhibitory transmission in ceptors (NMDARs)], which open to allow in- synapses, which differ in their molecular or- central excitatory + synapses flux of Na ions (and in the case of NMDARs, ganization (6, 7). The presynaptic special- also Ca2+ ions), thereby propagating electri- ization has been recently reviewed (8). The 824 Sheng · Hoogenraad ANRV313-BI76-33 ARI 1 May 2007 19:29 postsynaptic compartment is where most of naptic and extrasynaptic regions. The latter the molecular diversity of synapses lies and two terms are often used interchangeably, al- where the initial signal transduction events though it should be borne in mind that the NMDA receptor take place that lead to long-term synaptic perisynaptic membrane within 100 nm of the (NMDAR): plasticity. On the basis of recent progress in PSD probably differs in molecular content calcium-permeable this area, we aim to give a more quantita- and function from the extrasynaptic mem- glutamate receptor tive description of the postsynaptic special- brane at greater distances from the PSD. channel that ization, focusing on the postsynaptic density Extrasynaptic regions have specialized postsy- contributes to fast synaptic transmission (PSD) and emphasizing three-dimensional naptic functions and are enriched for a distinc- and that regulates (3D) structure, molecular stoichiometry, tive set of proteins, such as metabotropic glu- synaptic plasticity and spatial arrangement of postsynaptic tamate receptors (mGluRs) (14) and proteins Synaptic plasticity: components. involved in endocytosis (15) (Figure 1d ). On the ability of the most principal neurons in the mammalian synapse to alter its brain (e.g., pyramidal neurons of cortex and strength and MICROANATOMY OF THE hippocampus, Purkinje cells of cerebellum, structure EXCITATORY SYNAPSE medium spiny neurons of striatum), the post- Excitatory synapse: Ultrastructural features enable unambiguous synaptic specialization is housed on tiny actin- contact site where synaptic transmission identification of the pre- and postsynaptic rich protrusions called dendritic spines. In occurs by secretion sides of the synapse by electron microscopy contrast, inhibitory synapses are made on the of neurotransmitter (EM). Defining the presynaptic specialization shaft of the dendrite (Figure 1c). In inhibitory (glutamate) from is a cluster of synaptic vesicles (∼40 nm di- local circuit interneurons, which usually lack presynaptic neuron ameter), some of which are closely associated spines, the excitatory synapses are also made to postsynaptic neuron (“docked”) with a thickening of the presynap- on the dendritic shaft. The PSD (and hence tic plasma membrane (the active zone), where the synaptic contact) is typically located on the Postsynaptic density (PSD): an vesicle exocytosis occurs (8) (Figure 1a,b). dilated tip (“head”) of the spine. The dimen- electron-dense Directly apposed to the active zone (and per- sions of the spine head are highly correlated structure at the fectly matched with it in size and shape) is with the size of the PSD and associated active postsynaptic the PSD, an electron-dense thickening of the zone, as well as synaptic strength (16). membrane postsynaptic membrane, where glutamate re- containing many glutamate receptors, ceptor channels and their associated signaling Synaptic Cleft scaffold proteins, and proteins are highly concentrated (Figure 1a- signal transduction by SCELC Trial on 03/25/13. For personal use only. c). The presence of a prominent PSD is char- Separating the PSD and the active zone is molecules acteristic of glutamatergic synapses (hence the synaptic cleft, which measures ∼20 nm EM: electron they are termed asymmetric); in contrast, in- wide in conventional EM and ∼24 nm wide microscopy hibitory
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Guide to Glutamate Receptors
    A guide to glutamate receptors 1 Contents Glutamate receptors . 4 Ionotropic glutamate receptors . 4 - Structure ........................................................................................................... 4 - Function ............................................................................................................ 5 - AMPA receptors ................................................................................................. 6 - NMDA receptors ................................................................................................. 6 - Kainate receptors ............................................................................................... 6 Metabotropic glutamate receptors . 8 - Structure ........................................................................................................... 8 - Function ............................................................................................................ 9 - Group I: mGlu1 and mGlu5. .9 - Group II: mGlu2 and mGlu3 ................................................................................. 10 - Group III: mGlu4, mGlu6, mGlu7 and mGlu8 ............................................................ 10 Protocols and webinars . 11 - Protocols ......................................................................................................... 11 - Webinars ......................................................................................................... 12 References and further reading . 13 Excitatory synapse pathway
    [Show full text]
  • Do Thin Spines Learn to Be Mushroom Spines That Remember? Jennifer Bourne and Kristen M Harris
    CONEUR-488; NO OF PAGES 6 Do thin spines learn to be mushroom spines that remember? Jennifer Bourne and Kristen M Harris Dendritic spines are the primary site of excitatory input on most or whether they instead switch shapes depending on principal neurons. Long-lasting changes in synaptic activity are synaptic plasticity during learning. accompanied by alterations in spine shape, size and number. The responsiveness of thin spines to increases and decreases Maturation and stabilization of spines in synaptic activity has led to the suggestion that they are Spines tend to stabilize with maturation [5]; however, a ‘learning spines’, whereas the stability of mushroom spines small proportion continues to turnover in more mature suggests that they are ‘memory spines’. Synaptic brains [5–7]. The transient spines are thin spines that enhancement leads to an enlargement of thin spines into emerge and disappear over a few days, whereas mush- mushroom spines and the mobilization of subcellular resources room spines can persist for months [5,6]. Mushroom to potentiated synapses. Thin spines also concentrate spines have larger postsynaptic densities (PSDs) [1], biochemical signals such as Ca2+, providing the synaptic which anchor more AMPA glutamate receptors and make specificity required for learning. Determining the mechanisms these synapses functionally stronger [8–12]. Mushroom that regulate spine morphology is essential for understanding spines are more likely than thin spines to contain smooth the cellular changes that underlie learning and memory. endoplasmic reticulum, which can regulate Ca2+ locally [13], and spines that have larger synapses are also more Addresses Center for Learning and Memory, Department of Neurobiology, likely to contain polyribosomes for local protein synthesis University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712-0805, USA [14].
    [Show full text]
  • The Interplay Between Neurons and Glia in Synapse Development And
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect The interplay between neurons and glia in synapse development and plasticity Jeff A Stogsdill and Cagla Eroglu In the brain, the formation of complex neuronal networks and regulate distinct aspects of synaptic development and amenable to experience-dependent remodeling is complicated circuit connectivity. by the diversity of neurons and synapse types. The establishment of a functional brain depends not only on The intricate communication between neurons and glia neurons, but also non-neuronal glial cells. Glia are in and their cooperative roles in synapse formation are now continuous bi-directional communication with neurons to direct coming to light due in large part to advances in genetic the formation and refinement of synaptic connectivity. This and imaging tools. This article will examine the progress article reviews important findings, which uncovered cellular made in our understanding of the role of mammalian and molecular aspects of the neuron–glia cross-talk that perisynaptic glia (astrocytes and microglia) in synapse govern the formation and remodeling of synapses and circuits. development, maturation, and plasticity since the previ- In vivo evidence demonstrating the critical interplay between ous Current Opinion article [1]. An integration of past and neurons and glia will be the major focus. Additional attention new findings of glial control of synapse development and will be given to how aberrant communication between neurons plasticity is tabulated in Box 1. and glia may contribute to neural pathologies. Address Glia control the formation of synaptic circuits Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, In the CNS, glial cells are in tight association with NC 27710, USA synapses in all brain regions [2].
    [Show full text]
  • PRESYNAPTIC Α2δ SUBUNITS ARE KEY ORGANIZERS of GLUTAMATERGIC SYNAPSES Clemens L
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/826016; this version posted October 31, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. PRESYNAPTIC α2δ SUBUNITS ARE KEY ORGANIZERS OF GLUTAMATERGIC SYNAPSES Clemens L. Schöpf1, Stefanie Geisler1, Ruslan I. Stanika1, Marta Campiglio1, Walter A. Kaufmann3, Benedikt Nimmervoll1, Bettina Schlick1, Ryuichi Shigemoto3, and Gerald J. Obermair1,2* From Division of Physiology, Medical University Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck1, Division Physiology, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, A-3500 Krems2, and Institute of Science and Technology Austria, A-3400 Klosterneuburg3, Austria. Running head: Presynaptic α2δ subunits organize synapses Address correspondence to: *Gerald J. Obermair, Univ.-Prof. Dr., Phone: +43-2732-72090490, E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] In nerve cells the genes encoding for α2δ the auxiliary β and α2δ subunits. α2δ subunits, the subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels targets of the widely prescribed anti-epileptic and (VGCCs) have been linked to synaptic functions anti-allodynic drugs gabapentin and pregabalin, are and neurological disease. Here we show that α2δ membrane-anchored extracellular glycoproteins, subunits are essential for the formation and which modulate VGCC trafficking and calcium organization of glutamatergic synapses. Using a currents (Arikkath and Campbell, 2003; Dolphin, cellular α2δ subunit triple loss-of-function model, 2013; Geisler et al., 2015; Obermair et al., 2008; we demonstrate a failure in presynaptic Zamponi et al., 2015).
    [Show full text]
  • Modular Transport of Postsynaptic Density-95 Clusters and Association with Stable Spine Precursors During Early Development of Cortical Neurons
    The Journal of Neuroscience, December 1, 2001, 21(23):9325–9333 Modular Transport of Postsynaptic Density-95 Clusters and Association with Stable Spine Precursors during Early Development of Cortical Neurons Oliver Prange,1 and Timothy H. Murphy1,2 Kinsmen Laboratory, Departments of 1Psychiatry and 2Physiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z3 The properties of filopodia and spines and their association spine membranes can move. Although processes bearing clus- with the postsynaptic density (PSD) protein PSD-95 were stud- ters were generally stable, in 8 DIV neurons, we observed that ied during early development of cultured cortical neurons using a subset (ϳ10%) of PSD-95/GFP clusters underwent rapid time-lapse confocal microscopy. Neurons were transfected modular translocation between filopodia–spines and dendritic with recombinant PSD-95 constructs fused to green fluores- shafts. We conclude that, during early synaptic maturation, cent protein (GFP) for, on average, either 8 d in vitro (DIV) or 14 prefabricated PSD-95 clusters are trafficked in a developmen- DIV. We find that, during 1 hr of imaging, filopodia and spines tally regulated process that is associated with filopodial stabi- bearing PSD-95/GFP clusters are significantly more stable (i.e., lization and synapse formation. do not turnover) than those lacking clusters. When present within a spine precursor, a PSD-95/GFP cluster appeared to Key words: development; dendritic spine; filopodium; gluta- nucleate a relatively stable structure around which filopodium– mate receptor; NMDA receptor; PSD-95 The postsynaptic density (PSD) protein PSD-95 is a founding associated protein) via GK] can tether PSD-95 and its binding member of the growing superfamily of PDZ (PSD-95–Disks partners to the intracellular tubulin and actin lattice, respectively large–zona occludens1/2) domain-containing proteins (Craven (Scannevin and Huganir, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Neural Control and Neuromodulationof Lower Urinary
    Neural Control and Neuromodulation of Lower Urinary Tract Function William C. de Groat University of Pittsburgh Topics • Anatomy and functions of the lower urinary tract • Peripheral innervation (efferent and afferent nerves) • Central neural control of the lower urinary tract • Lower urinary tract dysfunction • Treatment of dysfunction (neuromodulation) • Research opportunities Anatomy and Functions of the Lower Urinary Tract Functions Two Types of Voiding 1. Urine storage - Reservoir: Bladder INVOLUNTARY (Reflex) (infant & fetus) Defect in 2. Urine release Maturation Maturation - Outlet: Urethra INVOLUNTARY THERAPY VOLUNTARY (Reflex) (adult) (adult) Bladder Parkinson’s, MS, stroke, brain tumors, spinal cord injury, Urethra aging, cystitis Lower Urinary Tract Innervation Two Types of Visceral Afferent Neurons: Bladder & Bowel Aδ-fibers responsible for normal bladder sensations C-fibers contribute to urgency, frequency and incontinence Afferent Sensitivity may be Influenced by Substances Released from the Urothelium Aδ fiber C fiber X CNS Urothelium The Bladder U rothelium Glycosaminoglycan Layer Uroplakin Plaques and Discoidal Vesicles r=_zo_"_"l_a_o_cc-lu---.dens } Umbrella Cell Stratum Intermediate Cell Stratum } Basal Cell Stratum Afferent Nerve fiber Urothelial-Afferent Interactions ( I ( I ( I ( ' ( I ( I ( I Urothelium ( I ( 0 I I I AChR ATP, NO, NKA, ACh, NGF ~erves ' Efferent ' nerves nerves Interaction of Sensory Pathways of Multiple Pelvic Organs Convergent Dichotomizing Branch Bladder point Colon Somatic and Visceral Afferent
    [Show full text]
  • Electrical Synapses and Their Functional Interactions with Chemical Synapses
    REVIEWS Electrical synapses and their functional interactions with chemical synapses Alberto E. Pereda Abstract | Brain function relies on the ability of neurons to communicate with each other. Interneuronal communication primarily takes place at synapses, where information from one neuron is rapidly conveyed to a second neuron. There are two main modalities of synaptic transmission: chemical and electrical. Far from functioning independently and serving unrelated functions, mounting evidence indicates that these two modalities of synaptic transmission closely interact, both during development and in the adult brain. Rather than conceiving synaptic transmission as either chemical or electrical, this article emphasizes the notion that synaptic transmission is both chemical and electrical, and that interactions between these two forms of interneuronal communication might be required for normal brain development and function. Communication between neurons is required for Electrical and chemical synapses are now known to brain function, and the quality of such communica- coexist in most organisms and brain structures, but details tion enables hardwired neural networks to act in a of the properties and distribution of these two modalities of dynamic fashion. Functional interactions between transmission are still emerging. Most research efforts neurons occur at anatomically identifiable cellular have focused on exploring the mechanisms of chemi- regions called synapses. Although the nature of synaptic cal transmission, and considerably less is known transmission has been an area of enormous controversy about those underlying electrical transmission. It was (BOX 1), two main modalities of synaptic transmission — thought that electrical synapses were more abundant namely, chemical and electrical — are now recognized. At in invertebrates and cold-blooded vertebrates than chemical synapses, information is transferred through in mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Developmental Changes in Calcium Channel Types Mediating Central Synaptic Transmission
    The Journal of Neuroscience, January 1, 2000, 20(1):59–65 Developmental Changes in Calcium Channel Types Mediating Central Synaptic Transmission Shinichi Iwasaki,1 Akiko Momiyama,2 Osvaldo D. Uchitel,3 and Tomoyuki Takahashi1 1Department of Neurophysiology, University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan, 2Laboratory of Cerebral Structure, National Institute for Physiological Sciences, Myodaiji, Okazaki 444-8585, Japan, and 3Departamento de Ciencias Biologicas, Laboratorio de Fisiologia y Biologia, Molecular, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires 1428, Argentina Multiple types of high-voltage-activated Ca 21 channels trigger fact, Ca 21 currents directly recorded from the auditory calyceal neurotransmitter release at the mammalian central synapse. presynaptic terminal were identified as N-, P/Q-, and R-types at Among them, the v-conotoxin GVIA-sensitive N-type channels postnatal day 7 (P7) to P10 but became predominantly P/Q- and the v-Aga-IVA-sensitive P/Q-type channels mediate fast type at P13. In contrast to thalamic and cerebellar IPSCs and synaptic transmission. However, at most central synapses, it is brainstem auditory EPSCs, N-type Ca 21 channels persistently not known whether the contributions of different Ca 21 channel contribute to cerebral cortical EPSCs and spinal IPSCs types to synaptic transmission remain stable throughout post- throughout postnatal months. Thus, in adult animals, synaptic natal development. We have addressed this question by testing transmission is predominantly mediated by P/Q-type channels type-specific Ca 21 channel blockers at developing central syn- at a subset of synapses and mediated synergistically by multi- apses.
    [Show full text]
  • GABA Enhances Transmission at an Excitatory Glutamatergic Synapse
    The Journal of Neuroscience, August 15, 2001, 21(16):5935–5943 GABA Enhances Transmission at an Excitatory Glutamatergic Synapse Scott Gutovitz, John T. Birmingham, Jason A. Luther, David J. Simon, and Eve Marder Volen Center and Biology Department, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02454-9110 GABA mediates both presynaptic and postsynaptic inhibition at ␤-(Aminomethyl)-4-chlorobenzenepropanoic acid (baclofen) many synapses. In contrast, we show that GABA enhances was an effective agonist for the GABA-evoked enhancement transmission at excitatory synapses between the lateral gastric but did not increase the postjunctional conductance. Muscimol and medial gastric motor neurons and the gastric mill 6a and 9 activated a rapid postsynaptic conductance but did not en- (gm6a, gm9) muscles and between the lateral pyloric motor hance the amplitude of the nerve-evoked EJPs. GABA had no neuron and pyloric 1 (p1) muscles in the stomach of the lobster effect on iontophoretic responses to glutamate and decreased Homarus americanus. Two-electrode current-clamp or voltage- the coefficient of variation of nerve-evoked EJPs. In the pres- clamp techniques were used to record from muscle fibers. The ence or absence of tetrodotoxin, GABA increased the fre- innervating nerves were stimulated to evoke excitatory junc- quency but not the amplitude of miniature endplate potentials. tional potentials (EJPs) or excitatory junctional currents. Bath These data suggest that GABA acts presynaptically via a application of GABA first decreased the amplitude of evoked GABAB-like receptor to increase the release of EJPs in gm6a and gm9 muscles, but not the p1 muscle, by neurotransmitter. activating a postjunctional conductance increase that was blocked by picrotoxin.
    [Show full text]
  • Presynaptic Establishment of the Synaptic Cleft Extracellular Matrix Is Required for Post-Synaptic Differentiation
    Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on September 27, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Presynaptic establishment of the synaptic cleft extracellular matrix is required for post-synaptic differentiation Jeffrey Rohrbough, Emma Rushton, Elvin Woodruff III, Tim Fergestad, Krishanthan Vigneswaran, and Kendal Broadie1 Department of Biological Sciences, Kennedy Center for Research on Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA Formation and regulation of excitatory glutamatergic synapses is essential for shaping neural circuits throughout development. In a Drosophila genetic screen for synaptogenesis mutants, we identified mind the gap (mtg), which encodes a secreted, extracellular N-glycosaminoglycan-binding protein. MTG is expressed neuronally and detected in the synaptic cleft, and is required to form the specialized transsynaptic matrix that links the presynaptic active zone with the post-synaptic glutamate receptor (GluR) domain. Null mtg embryonic mutant synapses exhibit greatly reduced GluR function, and a corresponding loss of localized GluR domains. All known post-synaptic signaling/scaffold proteins functioning upstream of GluR localization are also grossly reduced or mislocalized in mtg mutants, including the dPix–dPak–Dock cascade and the Dlg/PSD-95 scaffold. Ubiquitous or neuronally targeted mtg RNA interference (RNAi) similarly reduce post-synaptic assembly, whereas post-synaptically targeted RNAi has no effect, indicating that presynaptic MTG induces and maintains the post-synaptic pathways driving GluR domain formation. These findings suggest that MTG is secreted from the presynaptic terminal to shape the extracellular synaptic cleft domain, and that the cleft domain functions to mediate transsynaptic signals required for post-synaptic development. [Keywords: Glutamatergic synaptogenesis; post-synaptic density; glutamate receptor; secretion; Drosophila; neuromuscular junction] Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org.
    [Show full text]
  • Slitrk2 Controls Excitatory Synapse Development Via PDZ-Mediated
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Slitrk2 controls excitatory synapse development via PDZ-mediated protein interactions Kyung Ah Han 1,2, Jinhu Kim1,2, Hyeonho Kim1,2, Dongwook Kim1, Dongseok Lim1, Jaewon Ko 1 & Ji Won Um 1* Members of the Slitrk (Slit- and Trk-like protein) family of synaptic cell-adhesion molecules control excitatory and inhibitory synapse development through isoform-dependent extracellular interactions with leukocyte common antigen-related receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases (LAR-RPTPs). However, how Slitrks participate in activation of intracellular signaling pathways in postsynaptic neurons remains largely unknown. Here we report that, among the six members of the Slitrk family, only Slitrk2 directly interacts with the PDZ domain-containing excitatory scafolds, PSD-95 and Shank3. The interaction of Slitrk2 with PDZ proteins is mediated by the cytoplasmic COOH-terminal PDZ domain-binding motif (Ile-Ser-Glu-Leu), which is not found in other Slitrks. Mapping analyses further revealed that a single PDZ domain of Shank3 is responsible for binding to Slitrk2. Slitrk2 forms in vivo complexes with membrane-associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK) family proteins in addition to PSD-95 and Shank3. Intriguingly, in addition to its role in synaptic targeting in cultured hippocampal neurons, the PDZ domain-binding motif of Slitrk2 is required for Slitrk2 promotion of excitatory synapse formation, transmission, and spine development in the CA1 hippocampal region. Collectively, our data suggest a new molecular mechanism for conferring isoform-specifc regulatory actions of the Slitrk family in orchestrating intracellular signal transduction pathways in postsynaptic neurons. Synapses are asymmetric intercellular junctions that permit transmission of signals from presynaptic to postsyn- aptic neurons.
    [Show full text]
  • Glial Contribution to Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapse Loss in Neurodegeneration Henstridge, Christopher; Tzioras, Makis; Paolicelli, Rosa Chiara
    University of Dundee Glial contribution to excitatory and inhibitory synapse loss in neurodegeneration Henstridge, Christopher; Tzioras, Makis; Paolicelli, Rosa Chiara Published in: Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00063 Publication date: 2019 Licence: CC BY Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link to publication in Discovery Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Henstridge, C., Tzioras, M., & Paolicelli, R. C. (2019). Glial contribution to excitatory and inhibitory synapse loss in neurodegeneration. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 13, [63]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2019.00063 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in Discovery Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from Discovery Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain. • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal. Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 30. Sep. 2021 REVIEW published: 26 February 2019 doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00063
    [Show full text]