CHAPTER 13 WET DIGESTION METHODS Henryk Matusiewicz

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CHAPTER 13 WET DIGESTION METHODS Henryk Matusiewicz CHAPTER 13 WET DIGESTION METHODS Henryk Matusiewicz Politechnika Poznańska, Department of Analytical Chemistry, 60-965 Poznań, Poland ABSTRACT Sample preparation is the critical step of any analytical protocol, and involves steps from simple dilution to partial or total digestion. The present review focuses on wet digestion methods used for solid and liquid sample pre-treatment. The methods include wet decomposition and dissolution of the organic and inorganic samples, in open and closed systems, using thermal and radiant (ultraviolet and microwave) energy. The present and future tendencies for sample preparation also involve on-line decomposition and vapor-phase acid digestion. The intent is not to present the procedural details for the various samples, but rather to highlight the methods which are unique to each instrumental technique exist for the elemental analysis. The advantages and disadvantages of the various wet digestion methods have been emphasized. The bibliography accompanying this review should aid the analytical chemist in his/her search for the detailed preparation protocols. Chapter 13 1 INTRODUCTION AND BRIEF HISTORY Sample (matrix) digestion plays a central role in almost all analytical processes, but is not often recognized as an important step in analytical chemistry, with primary attention being directed to the determination step. This sense of priorities is reflected all too conspicuously in the equipment and investment planning of many analytical laboratories. However, a welcome trend in recent years points toward fuller recognition of the true importance of sample digestion (decomposition, dissolution) in the quest for high-quality analytical results and valid conclusions. Wet digestion with oxidizing acids is the most common sample preparation procedure. Many of the sample preparation methods currently in use were actually developed during the 19th century. In the early 1800s, Berzelius developed test tubes, separatory funnels, and platinum crucibles; in 1831 he first made use of the conversion of SiO2 to SiF4 by reaction with HF for analytical purposes. In 1834, Henry and Zeise developed methods for the gravimetric determination of sulfur as sulfate in organic samples. Their method called for the sample to be digested with fuming nitric acid or aqua regia and fused with potassium hydroxide or potassium nitrate. The first published wet digestion reagent was chloric acid from HCl + KClO3, as described in 1838 by Duflos [1] as well as by Remigius Fresenius and Babo [2] in 1844. The classical wet digestion reagent HNO3 + H2SO4 (the most important and most versatile of the so-called wet –oxidation mixtures) was investigated by Danger and Flandin in 1841 [3], for the destruction of organic matter. The use of pure concentrated HNO3 in a closed system under elevated temperatures and pressure is well known since 1860 from Carius [4]. Kjeldahl [5] digested organic biological material in 1883 with boiling concentrated H2SO4 in an open system. Hydrogen peroxide was introduced by Classen and Bauer [6] in 1884, and HClO4 was used at elevated temperatures by Stcherbak [7] in 1893. Relatively new is Van Slyk’s [8] mixture of H2SO4 + H3PO4 + KIO3 + K2Cr2O7 (1954). In 1955, Polley and Miller [9] introduced a mixture of 50% H2O2 + conc. H2SO4 as a • most powerful oxidizing reagent. Rediscovery of the high oxidizing power of OH 2+ radicals (Fenton’s reagent H2O2/Fe ) [10] for biological materials in 1961 and 1968, by Sansoni et al. [11,12] led to a technique for wet digestion at temperatures below 110 oC. Since the beginning of the seventies, a large increase of general interest in different digestion techniques and in publications dedicated especially to wet digestion methods, has been evident. This Chapter gives an overview of wet digestion methods and recent developments and applications of the digestion of different materials. Other sample preparation methods, such as chemical extraction and leaching, solubilization with bases, enzymatic decomposition, thermal decomposition and anodic oxidation, are beyond the scope of this contribution and will not be discussed here. 2 NOMENCLATURE For some methods of analysis, it may be required that the analytical sample be in a liquid form – the sample solution. Thus, standard procedures to convert solid (or solid containing) samples to solutions prior to detection is required. However, this conventional designation is often imprecise or even misleading with respect to the actual mechanism of the process. Several very different names are sometimes applied to a single technique, which presents a considerable obstacle for anyone (particularly a non-specialist) interested in acquiring a quick overview of systems applicable to a specific task. The terms decomposition (of organic materials), dissolution (of inorganic materials), destruction, digestion, ashing, mineralization, acid-digestion, wet-ashing and even oxidative acid digestion all refer to this process. In this Chapter, the general 225 Chapter 13 expression will be digestion, which is specified as wet digestion; therefore wet digestion will be the term used for obtaining the resulting acid solution. It should be mentioned that guidelines for terms used in sample digestion are provided by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) Analytical Chemistry Division [13, 14]. 3 BIBLIOGRAPHY There are numerous publications giving useful information on the digestion (dissolution and/or decomposition) of any conceivable combination of matrix and analyte. Some comprehensive books and general review articles (and references cited therein) contain material pertinent to either organic [15-18] or inorganic [19-22] matrices; others, to both [23-29]. Within the scope of this Chapter, a comprehensive discussion on digestion techniques is not feasible. For more comprehensive information, the following reviews and books are available: books by Šulcek and Povondra [20], by Bock [23] and by Krakovská and H-M. Kuss [29] are dedicated solely to digestion methods. Other books deal exclusively with a single technique: microwave-assisted sample preparation [30, 31], this topic has also been reviewed elsewhere [32-39]; even the literature on the use of microwave-assisted digestion procedures for subsequent sample analysis by means of electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ET-AAS) is reviewed [40]. In 1997 the establishment of a site on the World Wide Web (WWW) for information transfer and education in the areas of sample preparation and microwave chemistry (http://www.sampleprep.duq.edu/sampleprep) was announced. Recommended guidelines for sample preparation (methods of digestion) of different matrices are also available from the Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry [41]. Although it is very difficult to refer to every paper published in this area, the enlisted bibliography of this Chapter gives comprehensive coverage of advance of the topic made to date. To follow the latest development and new applications in this field, the reader may consult the annual reviews in the Journal of Analytical Chemistry and Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry. Relevant material is to be found under the headings “Sample preparation”, “Sample digestion” and “Sample dissolution”, for the appropriate topics. Literature cited herein is not intended to be comprehensive, but has been selected with a view to relevance, a pertinent review or seminal topic paper, or for potential application, novel developments, and progress in wet digestion techniques. 4 REAGENTS AND VESSEL MATERIALS FOR WET DIGESTION PROCEDURES Sample wet digestion is a method of converting the components of a matrix into simple chemical forms. This digestion is produced by supplying energy, such as heat; by using a chemical reagent, such as an acid; or by a combination of the two methods. Where a reagent is used, its nature will depend on that of the matrix. The amount of reagent used is dictated by the sample size which, in turn, depends on the sensitivity of the method of determination. However, the process of putting a material into solution is often the most critical step of the analytical process, since there are many sources of potential errors, i.e., partial digestion of the analytes present, or some type of contamination from the vessels of chemical products used. It is beyond the scope of this contribution to discuss all possible systematic errors, therefore, further details on how to avoid systematic errors during sample digestion cannot be referred to in detail here. 226 Chapter 13 The majority of wet digestion methods (total decomposition and strong attack) involve the use of some combination of oxidizing acids (HNO3, hot conc. HClO4, hot conc. H2SO4) and non-oxidizing acids (HCl, HF, H3PO4, dilute H2SO4, dilute HClO4) and hydrogen peroxide. All of these acids are corrosive in nature, especially when hot and concentrated, and should be handled with caution to avert injury and accidents. Concentrated acids with the requisite high degree of purity are available commercially, but they can be purified further by subboiling distillation [42]. Detailed discussion of the properties and applications of these reagents may be found elsewhere [20, 22-25]. Wet digestion has the advantage of being effective on both inorganic and organic materials. It often destroys or removes the sample matrix, thus helping to reduce or eliminate some types of interference. The physical properties of the common mineral acids used in sample preparation are summarized in Table 1. TABLE 1
Recommended publications
  • Bioanalytical Development Method and Validation
    Ganesh A. Chavan et al /J. Pharm. Sci. & Res. Vol. 11(11), 2019, 3606-3617 Bioanalytical Development Method and Validation Ganesh A. Chavan 1*, Siddhata A. Deshmukh 1, Rajendra B. Patil 2, Suvarna S. Vanjari 2 1Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, J.S.P.M’s Rajarshi Shahu College of Pharmacy and Research, Survey No.80, Tathawade, Pune 411033. 2 Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, J.S.P.M’s Rajarshi Shahu College of Pharmacy and Research, Survey No.80, Tathawade, Pune 411033. Abstract Bioanalysis is very essential to understand the pharmacokinetic, toxicologic of drug. It also based on the various types of biological techniques and the physico-chemical, it must be validated for the confidence of good result. In this bioanalysis there develop a new method for validation, accuracy, precision, selectivity. It is also very effective to quantitative analysis of analytes. It play very important role in evaluation and interpretation bioequivalence, pharmacokinetic and toxicokinetic studies. There some guidelines for the bioanalysis. These are also following the GLP and GMP. It develops the new method for quantitative analysis of any drug. It also focuses on the validation parameters. Bioanalysis is very important to understand the drug content in plasma, blood, serum or urine. Keywords: Application, Bioanalytical development method, Specification, Validation Parameters. INTRODUCTION It is used for the extraction of the solvent and the The responsibility of analytical findings could be a matter partitioning. It is based on the two different phase such as of nice importance in rhetorical and clinical Materia aqueous phase and the organic phase.the extraction of media.
    [Show full text]
  • NIRS White Paper.Indd
    NIRS WHITE PAPER NNeare a r IInfran f r a rrede d SSpecp e c ttrosr o s ccopyo p y for forage and feed testing History and utility Initially described in the literature in 1939, NIRS was fi rst applied to agricultural products in 1968 by Karl Norris and co-workers. They observed that cereal grains exhibited specifi c absorption bands in the NIR region and suggested that NIR instruments could be used to measure grain protein, oil, and moisture. Research in 1976 demonstrated that absorption of other specifi c wavelengths was correlated with chemical analysis of forages. John Shenk and his research team utilized a custom designed spectro-computer system in 1977 to pro- vide rapid and accurate analysis of forage quality. Early in 1978, this group developed a portable instrument for use in a mobile van to deliver nutrient analysis of forages directly on-farm and at hay auctions. This evolved into the use of university extension mobile NIR vans in Pennsylvania, Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Illinois. In 1978, the USDA NIRS For- age Network was founded to develop and test computer software to advance the science of NIRS grain and forage testing. By 1983, several commercial companies had begun mar- keting NIR instruments and software packages for forage and feed analysis. Application of this scientifi c technique today allows laboratories and equipment manufac- turers to serve the livestock industry by providing rapid, highly reproducible and cost-ef- fective analysis of grain and forage via a non-destructive method requiring minimal sample preparation. Perhaps the greatest contribution of NIR-based analysis is that it reduces the total analytical error (sampling and laboratory) because a larger number of sub-samples or sequential samples can be assayed with a limited analytical budget than is possible using the more expensive wet chemistry approaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance for the Validation of Analytical Methodology and Calibration of Equipment Used for Testing of Illicit Drugs in Seized Materials and Biological Specimens
    Vienna International Centre, PO Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria Tel.: (+43-1) 26060-0, Fax: (+43-1) 26060-5866, www.unodc.org Guidance for the Validation of Analytical Methodology and Calibration of Equipment used for Testing of Illicit Drugs in Seized Materials and Biological Specimens FOR UNITED NATIONS USE ONLY United Nations publication ISBN 978-92-1-148243-0 Sales No. E.09.XI.16 *0984578*Printed in Austria ST/NAR/41 V.09-84578—October 2009—200 A commitment to quality and continuous improvement Photo credits: UNODC Photo Library Laboratory and Scientific Section UNITED NATIONS OFFICE ON DRUGS AND CRIME Vienna Guidance for the Validation of Analytical Methodology and Calibration of Equipment used for Testing of Illicit Drugs in Seized Materials and Biological Specimens A commitment to quality and continuous improvement UNITED NATIONS New York, 2009 Acknowledgements This manual was produced by the Laboratory and Scientific Section (LSS) of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and its preparation was coor- dinated by Iphigenia Naidis and Satu Turpeinen, staff of UNODC LSS (headed by Justice Tettey). LSS wishes to express its appreciation and thanks to the members of the Standing Panel of the UNODC’s International Quality Assurance Programme, Dr. Robert Anderson, Dr. Robert Bramley, Dr. David Clarke, and Dr. Pirjo Lillsunde, for the conceptualization of this manual, their valuable contributions, the review and finali- zation of the document.* *Contact details of named individuals can be requested from the UNODC Laboratory and Scientific Section (P.O. Box 500, 1400 Vienna, Austria). ST/NAR/41 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No.
    [Show full text]
  • New Techniques for Sample Preparation in Analytical Chemistry
    Division for Chemistry Department of Analytical Chemistry Zeki Altun New Techniques for Sample Preparation in Analytical Chemistry Karlstad University Studies 2005:24 ฀ ฀฀ ฀฀ ฀ ฀฀ ฀฀฀฀฀฀฀฀฀ ฀ ฀฀฀ ฀ ฀ ฀฀ ฀ ฀฀ ฀฀ ฀฀฀ ฀฀฀฀ ฀฀฀฀ 06 6 6 + +. -+ 0.+ 0 * 0+. 4+4+ 7 +6 4 8 + +0 +. ++0 7+. 06 6 6 + 0 +* 7+ - +6+ .+0 + + # +6 7+ + 0+ 06 6 6 + 0 7#+76 4 8 .+06 6 6 + - + + # + 8 +0+769/: 7+0+769;/:- +6 + < + 6 7 915: 4+ #6 < + 951: 8 0 = - .+0 15 66+< 0 !07+.+- 0 +7 7 7 9!# :6706 6 6 + 6 + 6 - 1 + +. 8 4+ - 0 + +.+ 0 6006 715+ # 4 / 00 6 +0 9#:15+ + +06 4. +0 #6+. 06 +++ 0 + +.6006 0 67+.+- +- .+-+! < + - .+ 4 . 0+. 4+4+ 06 6 6 + +76*+ + 6+- 6 6 64 6 4 67+.6++6+0 0+ + 06 +- 4 + + 4 %'#4 6 /##2 ++ 0 60 4 06 4 0+ - %'#6 4 4+0 3 / + & =+- +-+ *5 + * 6+6 & & / 1 /$ ? /!$ ? / / , 6 /1/ /6 1 ++0+76 , , +< -+ 1;, 1 ;+, 0 1 1 +6+ = + ;/ ;/+0+76 ; ; , , 0 ) A + B+ / 8 /+0+76 1 8 # 8 1< + 15 +1< + 5 7 ?C + 6 +0 # * 06 +0 5, 5+ 0 +< A A -+ A5#/ A #5 8 /+0+76 &1 &+- 1< + 5,1 + #5 , 0 1< + 51 + #5 1< + 51 + #5 + < + A A + + + 7 A + * 0 A + * 0 A D D + 4 ! " !# $%& " ' # ("#""# ) * ! ! " !+, " " $ +0 - #A 0 ;&+0- 7 "% 9:!$$#!%" - *, "# ./%# # $%& " 0# # ! ("#""# ) % ! 1% %%$ +0 - #A 0 ;&+0- 7 $!"9:!%#!" "# ,! !) # ! !# #" # 23%, .4 23% 5 ### $ ;&+0- 7 +0 - #A 0-0 + 9: 5 ,# ! + + ( !!06 5 6 + ( !!!+ #5 1< + 951: ( !!!!06 5+ 7 51$ !!!/+06+ A + 51% !* 06 5 6 + ! !" + < + 5 7 915: !! ! & 5++5+0 + + ! ! 8 /+0+769/:! !'6 +0 9:!" !(06 ! !(!+ ! !(A++ ?+0+ !' * 0+.* 2+!( "A , + !$ "!15/+ + !$ " +, +60 956 :!$ "!* +- !% "* 2 7+ ""* 1 + + " ""/#+ "C 706 *+76 7+ + 5 * 6956 : "!* 5 6 + +.5++5+0 + + " +.5+9;#1;,#&:+ + .+5 6 * 6 "06 7' "' ( /+ + % +4 7 0 " A .
    [Show full text]
  • Microwave Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (MP-AES)
    January 2021 Edition Microwave Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy (MP-AES) Application eHandbook AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES Atomic Spectroscopy Solutions > Search entire document Table of contents How Microwave Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscopy works 4 The benefits of MP-AES 6 Why switch from FAAS to MP-AES? 7 Expanding capabilities with accessories 10 Applications 11 Agilent’s Atomic Spectroscopy Portfolio 12 Food & Agriculture 13 Routine analysis of total arsenic in California wines using the Agilent 4200/4210 MP-AES 14 Determination of available micronutrients in DTPA extracted soils using the Agilent 4210 MP-AES 20 Determination of major elements in milk using the Agilent 4200 MP-AES 24 Elemental profiling of Malbec Wines for geographical origin using an Agilent 4200 MP-AES 28 Analysis of major, minor and trace elements in rice flour using the 4200 MP-AES 33 Analysis of major elements in fruit juices using the Agilent 4200 MP-AES with the Agilent 4107 Nitrogen Generator 38 Direct analysis of milk using the Agilent 4100 Microwave Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometer (MP-AES) 42 Analysis of aluminum in beverages using the Agilent 4100 Microwave Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometer (MP-AES) 46 Analysis of Chinese herbal medicines by microwave plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (MP-AES) 50 Determination of metals in soils using the 4100 MP-AES 54 Cost-effective analysis of major, minor and trace elements in foodstuffs using the 4100 MP-AES 59 Determination of metals in wine using the Agilent 4100 Microwave Plasma-Atomic Emission Spectrometer
    [Show full text]
  • Electrochemically Reduced Graphene Oxide-Based Screen-Printed
    sensors Article Electrochemically Reduced Graphene Oxide-Based Screen-Printed Electrodes for Total Tetracycline Determination by Adsorptive Transfer Stripping Differential Pulse Voltammetry 1,2 1 2, 2, Anabela S. Lorenzetti , Tania Sierra , Claudia E. Domini *, Adriana G. Lista y, Agustin G. Crevillen 3 and Alberto Escarpa 1,4,* 1 Department of Analytical Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Alcala, E-28871 Alcala de Henares, Spain; [email protected] (A.S.L.); [email protected] (T.S.) 2 INQUISUR, Department of Chemistry, Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS)-CONICET, Av. Alem 1253, Bahía Blanca 8000, Argentina; [email protected] 3 Department of Analytical Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), E-28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] 4 Chemical Research Institute “Andrés M. del Río” (IQAR), University of Alcalá, E-28805 Alcalá de Henares, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected] (C.E.D.); [email protected] (A.E.) In memoriam. y Received: 11 November 2019; Accepted: 19 December 2019; Published: 21 December 2019 Abstract: Disposable electrochemically reduced graphene oxide-based (ERGO) screen-printed electrodes (SPE) were developed for the determination of total tetracyclines as a sample screening approach. To this end, a selective adsorption-detection approach relied on adsorptive transfer stripping differential pulse voltammetry (AdTDPV) was devised, where the high adsorption capacity and the electrochemical properties of ERGO were simultaneously exploited. The approach was very simple, fast (6 min.), highly selective by combining the adsorptive and the electrochemical features of tetracyclines, and it used just 10 µL of the sample. The electrochemical sensor applicability was demonstrated in the analysis of environmental and food samples.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Validation of Chemical Methods for the FDA FVM Program, 3Rd Ed
    ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Memorandum To: Foods Program Governance Board From: FDA Foods Program Regulatory Science Steering Committee (RSSC) Date: October 17, 2019 Subject: Guidelines for the Validation of Chemical Methods for the FDA Foods Program, 3rd Edition The FDA Foods Program Regulatory Science Steering Committee (RSSC), made up of representatives from the Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (CFSAN), the Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM), the Office of Regulatory Affairs (ORA), the National Center for Toxicological Research (NCTR), and the Office of the Chief Scientist of the FDA, is charged with the task of prioritizing, coordinating and integrating human food- and animal food-related science and research activities across the operating units of FDA's Foods Program. As a regulatory agency tasked with ensuring the safety of the nation's food supply, it is imperative that the laboratory methods needed to support regulatory compliance, investigations and enforcement actions meet the highest analytical performance standards appropriate for their intended purposes. Development of standardized validation requirements for all regulatory methods used in our laboratories to detect chemical and radiological contaminants, as well as microbial pathogens, is a critical step in ensuring that we continue to meet the highest standards possible. The attached document, now formally adopted by the RSSC, updates and renews the requirements that must be fulfilled in the evaluation of chemical methods to be used in our testing laboratories and supersedes the prior guidelines. These updated guidelines are posted on FDA's Foods Program Methods website. Please share these chemical methods validation guidelines with anyone who may be conducting or supervising chemical methods validation projects or otherwise needs to be aware of these updated requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of Nir Spectroscopy and Multivariate Process Spectra Calibration Methodology for Pharmaceutical Solid Samples Analysis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Diposit Digital de Documents de la UAB USE OF NIR SPECTROSCOPY AND MULTIVARIATE PROCESS SPECTRA CALIBRATION METHODOLOGY FOR PHARMACEUTICAL SOLID SAMPLES ANALYSIS Vanessa Cárdenas Espitia Prof. Dr Marcel Blanco Romía Prof. Dr. Manel Alcalà Bernardez Applied Chemometrics Group Chemistry department Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona! Spain ! Memoria presentada con el fin de aprobar el correspondiente módulo de iniciación a la investigación y trabajo de fin de master, correspondiente al Master Oficial en Ciencia y Tecnologías Químicas. Vanessa Cárdenas Espitia Visto bueno Prof. Dr. Marcel Blanco Romía Prof. Dr. Manel Alcalà Bernardez Bellaterra, 3 de Septiembre de 2012 ! AGRADECIMIENTOS Para empezar quisiera expresar mis mas sinceros agradecimientos al Profesor Marcel Blanco Romia y al Dr. Manel Alcalà Bernardez por su paciencia, enseñanzas e incondicional asesoria. Gracias por orientarme en estos primeros pasos de la quimiometría. A mis compañeros del grupo de investigación en quimiometria aplicada y todo el personal docente, de cada uno de ellos he tenido la oportunidad de aprender. Gracias por su ayuda y soporte técnico. Especialmente a mis compañeros del día a día (Anna, David, Juan y Sergi) quienes han hecho de lab una muy buena experiencia. A la Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, quienes a través de la beca PIF hicieron possible la realización de este master. Este es el momento tambien para agradecer a Mamá, Papá y a mi hermano Santi quienes de lejos siempre me apoyan y me han enseñado a ser fuerte lejos de casa. También a todos quienes contribuyeron de una u otra forma para hacer este trabajo possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Preparation for Atomic Spectroscopic Analysis: an Overview
    Available online a t www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Pelagia Research Library Advances in Applied Science Research, 2012, 3 (3): 1733-1737 ISSN: 0976-8610 CODEN (USA): AASRFC Sample preparation for atomic spectroscopic analysis: An overview Nabil Ramadan Bader a and Barbara Zimmermann b aChemistry Department, Faculty of Science, Benghazi University, Benghazi, Libya bDepartment of Water Technology, IWW Water-Centre, Muelheim A.D. Ruhr, Germany _____________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT Sample preparation is an important step in chemical analysis, from time and reagent consuming point of view and from the probability of errors. In the present article, types of samples, problems associated with sample preparation, and sample preparation for most used atomic spectroscopic techniques, FAAS, GFAAS, ICP, and XRF have been discussed. Keywords: Sample preparation, Atomic spectroscopy, decomposition, separation, pre-concentration. _____________________________________________________________________________ Analysis by atomic spectroscopic methods practically always necessitates a simple or more complex preparation of the sample. These steps of sample preparation are generally the most critical part of analysis because they are responsible for the most errors.[1-3] In an analytical method sample preparation is followed by a separation and detection procedure. Only a few direct methods allow the introduction of the sample without any preparation. In these cases the lack of reliable calibration is the major problem. On the other hand, sample preparation allows the separation and/or pre-concentration of analytes and makes possible the use of several determination methods. Sample preparations involve digestion, extraction and preparation of the analytes before the analysis, so this step is time limiting, requiring ca . 61% of the total time to perform the complete analysis, and is responsible for 30% of the total analysis error.
    [Show full text]
  • 14 Validation of Analytical Methods Based on Chromatographic Techniques: an Overview Juan Peris-Vicente, Josep Esteve-Romero, and Samuel Carda-Broch
    CH14V6 05/14/2015 3:1:17 Page 1 1 14 Validation of Analytical Methods Based on Chromatographic Techniques: An Overview Juan Peris-Vicente, Josep Esteve-Romero, and Samuel Carda-Broch 14.1 What Validation Is? The purpose of any analytical method is to provide consistent, reliable, and accu- rate data. For this reason, the performances and the limitations of the method, as well as the external influences which may modify these features, must be deter- mined prior to its use. Validation plays a major role in achieving this goal [1,2]. The word “validation” comes from the Latin term validus, meaning worth/strong, thus suggesting that something is true, useful, and reliable [3]. The most accurate definition of validation is that provided by ISO 9000:2000 as the confirmation, by means of a thorough examination and obtaining realistic and unequivocal evidences, that the procedure is effectively applicable for its indented purpose [4]. Validation is the act of proving that any approach, strategy, experimental pro- cedure, process, laboratory staff, instrumentation, reagents, and room conditions selected for the method will function in a proper way under a fixed set of condi- tions. Besides, it can be used to individually evaluate the appropriateness of these factors [5]. The validation evaluates the range and conditions of applicability, and checks if every future measurement in routine analysis will provide a con- centration of the analyte close enough to the true value [6]. In addition, it can also quantify the degree of coincidence of a measured concentration and the true value, by the calculation of the bias and the uncertainty associated with the result [7].
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Preparation Techniques for the Analysis of Microplastics in Soil—A Review
    sustainability Review Sample Preparation Techniques for the Analysis of Microplastics in Soil—A Review Daniela Thomas 1,* , Berit Schütze 1,2, Wiebke Mareile Heinze 3 and Zacharias Steinmetz 4,* 1 Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries, Institute of Agricultural Technology, Bundesallee 47, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany 2 Institute of Environmental and Sustainable Chemistry, Technical University of Braunschweig, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany; [email protected] 3 Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7014, 75007 Uppsala, Sweden; [email protected] 4 iES Landau, Institute for Environmental Sciences, Group of Environmental and Soil Chemistry, University of Koblenz–Landau, Fortstraße 7, 76829 Landau, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] (D.T.); [email protected] (Z.S.) Received: 30 September 2020; Accepted: 29 October 2020; Published: 31 October 2020 Abstract: Although most plastic pollution originates on land, current research largely remains focused on aquatic ecosystems. Studies pioneering terrestrial microplastic research have adapted analytical methods from aquatic research without acknowledging the complex nature of soil. Meanwhile, novel methods have been developed and further refined. However, methodical inconsistencies still challenge a comprehensive understanding of microplastic occurrence and fate in and on soil. This review aims to disentangle the variety of state-of-the-art sample preparation techniques
    [Show full text]
  • Trends in Food Science & Technology
    Trends in Food Science & Technology 76 (2018) 38–55 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Trends in Food Science & Technology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/tifs What are the scientific challenges in moving from targeted to non-targeted T methods for food fraud testing and how can they be addressed? – Spectroscopy case study ∗ Terry F. McGratha, , Simon A. Haugheya, Jenny Pattersona, Carsten Fauhl-Hassekb, James Donarskic, Martin Alewijnd, Saskia van Ruthd, Christopher T. Elliotta a Institute for Global Food Security, ASSET Technology Centre, School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom b German Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR) Max-Dohrn-Straße 8-10, D-10589, Berlin, Germany c Fera Science Ltd, Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ, United Kingdom d RIKILT, Wageningen University and Research, P.O. Box 230, 6700 AE, Wageningen, The Netherlands ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Background: The authenticity of foodstuffs and associated fraud has become an important area. It is estimated Food authenticity that global food fraud costs approximately $US49b annually. In relation to testing for this malpractice, analytical Spectroscopy technologies exist to detect fraud but are usually expensive and lab based. However, recently there has been a Chemometric model move towards non-targeted methods as means for detecting food fraud but the question arises if these techniques Non-targeted will ever be accepted as routine. Scientific opinion Scope and approach: In this opinion paper, many aspects
    [Show full text]