DOCSLIB.ORG

Coal Mine Methane Country Profiles Was Prepared by Coalbed Methane Outreach Program, an Initiative of the U.S

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coal Mine Methane Country Profiles Was Prepared by Coalbed Methane Outreach Program, an Initiative of the U.S CMM Country Profiles Disclaimer The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency does not: a) Make any warranty or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe upon privately owned rights; or b) Assume any liability with respect to the use of, or damages resulting from the use of, any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report. CMM Country Profiles CONTENTS Units and Conversions.............................................................................................................................. i Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. ii Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 1 Argentina ......................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Summary of Coal Industry ................................................................................................. 3 1.1.1 Role of Coal in Argentina .......................................................................................... 3 1.1.2 Stakeholders ............................................................................................................ 4 1.1.3 Status of Coal and the Coal Mining Industry ............................................................. 5 1.2 Overview of CMM Emissions and Development Potential................................................... 5 1.2.1 CMM Emissions from Operating Mines ..................................................................... 5 1.2.2 CMM Emissions from Abandoned Coal Mines .......................................................... 5 1.2.3 CBM from Virgin Coal Seams ................................................................................... 6 1.3 Opportunities and Challenges to Greater CMM Recovery and Use .................................... 6 1.3.1 Market and Infrastructure Factors ............................................................................. 6 1.3.2 Regulatory Information ............................................................................................. 7 1.4 Profiles of Individual Mines ................................................................................................ 7 1.5 References ........................................................................................................................ 9 2 Australia ........................................................................................................................................ 10 2.1 Summary of Coal Industry ............................................................................................... 10 2.1.1 Role of Coal in Australia ......................................................................................... 10 2.1.2 Stakeholders .......................................................................................................... 11 2.1.3 Status of Coal and the Coal Mining Industry ........................................................... 12 2.2 Overview of CMM Emissions and Development Potential................................................. 13 2.2.1 CMM Emissions from Operating Mines ................................................................... 13 2.2.2 CMM Emissions from Abandoned Coal Mines ........................................................ 14 2.2.3 CBM from Virgin Coal Seams ................................................................................. 15 2.3 Opportunities and Challenges to Greater CMM Recovery and Use .................................. 15 2.3.1 Market and Infrastructure Factors ........................................................................... 16 2.3.2 Regulatory Information ........................................................................................... 17 2.4 Profiles of Individual Mines .............................................................................................. 18 2.5 References ...................................................................................................................... 18 3 Botswana ...................................................................................................................................... 21 3.1 Summary of Coal Industry ............................................................................................... 21 3.1.1 Role of Coal in Botswana ....................................................................................... 21 3.1.2 Stakeholders .......................................................................................................... 22 3.1.3 Status of Coal and the Coal Mining Industry ........................................................... 22 3.2 Overview of CMM Emissions and Development Potential................................................. 23 3.2.1 CMM Emissions from Operating Mines ................................................................... 23 3.2.2 CMM Emissions from Abandoned Coal Mines ........................................................ 23 3.2.3 CBM from Virgin Coal Seams ................................................................................. 23 3.3 Opportunities and Challenges to Greater CMM Recovery and Use .................................. 24 3.3.1 Market and Infrastructure Factors ........................................................................... 24 3.3.2 Regulatory Information ........................................................................................... 24 3.4 Profiles of Individual Mines .............................................................................................. 24 3.5 References ...................................................................................................................... 25 4 Brazil ............................................................................................................................................. 27 4.1 Summary of Coal Industry ............................................................................................... 27 CMM Country Profiles 4.1.1 Role of Coal in Brazil .............................................................................................. 27 4.1.2 Stakeholders .......................................................................................................... 28 4.1.3 Status of Coal and the Coal Mining Industry ........................................................... 29 4.2 Overview of CMM Emissions and Development Potential................................................. 32 4.2.1 CMM Emissions from Operating Mines ................................................................... 32 4.2.2 CMM Emissions from Abandoned Coal Mines ........................................................ 32 4.2.3 CBM from Virgin Coal Seams ................................................................................. 32 4.3 Opportunities and Challenges to Greater CMM Recovery and Use .................................. 33 4.3.1 Market and Infrastructure Factors ........................................................................... 33 4.3.2 Regulatory Information ........................................................................................... 33 4.4 Profiles of Individual Mines .............................................................................................. 33 4.5 References ...................................................................................................................... 34 5 Bulgaria ......................................................................................................................................... 36 5.1 Summary of Coal Industry ............................................................................................... 36 5.1.1 Role of Coal in Bulgaria .......................................................................................... 36 5.1.2 Stakeholders .......................................................................................................... 37 5.1.3 Status of Coal and the Coal Mining Industry ........................................................... 37 5.2 Overview of CMM Emissions and Development Potential................................................. 38 5.2.1 CMM Emissions from Operating Mines ................................................................... 38 5.2.2 CMM Emissions from Abandoned Coal Mines ........................................................ 39 5.2.3 CBM from Virgin Coal Seams ................................................................................. 39 5.3 Opportunities and Challenges to Greater CMM Recovery and Use .................................. 39 5.3.1 Market and Infrastructure Factors ........................................................................... 40 5.3.2 Regulatory Information ........................................................................................... 40 5.4 Profiles of Individual Mines .............................................................................................. 40 5.5 References ...................................................................................................................... 40 6 Canada ........................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Overview of Coal Mining Industry in India
    GOVT. OF INDIA OVERVIEW OF COAL MINING INDUSTRY IN INDIA FUTURE PROSPECTS AND POSSIBILITIES PARTHA S. BHATTACHARYYA CHAIRMAN, COAL INDIA LIMITED 05-07Th. JUNE 2007 CONTENT SN TOPIC SLIDE No. 1 Background 1-6 2 Nationalisation of Coal Industry 7-11 3 Turn around of CIL 12-15 4 X Plan performance 16-19 5 Demand and production projections 20-25 6 THRUST AREAS 26 A New Strategy 27-38 B Beneficiation of Non-coking coal 39-41 C Clean coal technologies 42-45 D Coal Videsh 46 % SHARE OF COMMERCIAL PRIMARY ENERGY RESOURCES - INDIA NUCLEAR 2% HYDRO 2% NATURAL GAS 9% COAL 51% OIL 36% 1 A.CIL :COAL PRODUCING SUBSIDIARIES 1 8 EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD. (1) 5 4 3 BHARAT COKING COAL LTD. (2) CENTRAL COALFIELDS LTD. (3) NORTHERN COALFIELDS LTD. (4) WESTERN COALFIELDS LTD. (5) SOUTH EASTERN COALFIELDS LTD.(6) MAHANADI COALFIELDS LTD. (7) NORTH EASTERN COALFIELDS. (8) ( A UNIT UNDER CIL(HQ) ) 2 PLANNING & DESIGN INSTITUTE COAL 7 LIGNITE CENTRAL MINE PLANNING & DESIGN INSTITUTE (CMPDIL) 6 B.SINGARENI COLLIERIES CO. LTD. (9) 9 10 C.NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPORATION (10) 2 INDIAN COAL RESOURCES – 2007 (Bill T) 33.2 222 Coking Non-Coking TOTAL RESOURCE – 255.2 3 COAL RESERVES IN INDIA (As on 1.1.2007) (Billion T) TYPE OF COAL PROVED INDICATED INFERRED TOTAL Prime Coking 4.6 0.7 0.0 5.3 Medium Coking 11.8 11.6 1.9 25.3 Semi Coking 0.5 1.0 0.2 1.7 Non coking 80.6 105.6 35.8 222.0 TOTAL 97.9 119.0 38.3 255.2 Lignite 4.3 12.7 20.1 37.1 4 Proved resource is around 10% of world’s proved reserves CHARACTERISTICS OF INDIAN COAL DEPOSITS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Production
    Coal Production A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z AA AB AC AD AE AF AG AH AI AJ AK 1 2 Summary of coal production entered on entity worksheets 3 Richard Heede 4 Climate Mitigation Services 5 22-May-13 6 7 8 1850s 1860s 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 9 Coal 10 11 12 13 1 Alpha Natural Resources, USA 14 15 2 Anglo American, UK 16 17 3 Arch Coal Company, USA 18 19 4 British Coal Corporation, UK 20 21 5 BP Coal, UK 22 23 6 BHP Billiton, Australia 24 25 7 China, Peoples Republic 26 27 8 Coal India, India 28 29 9 ConocoPhillips, USA 30 31 10 Consol Energy, USA 0.03 0.05 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0 0 32 33 11 Cyprus Amax, USA 34 35 12 Czechoslovakia 36 37 13 Czech Republic + Slovakia 38 39 14 ExxonMobil, USA 40 41 15 FSU (Former Soviet Union) 42 43 16 Kazakhstan 44 45 17 Kerr-McGee Coal (Anadarko), USA 46 47 18 Kiewit Mining Group, USA 48 49 19 Luminant, USA 50 51 20 Massey Energy, USA 52 53 21 Murray Coal, USA 54 55 22 North American Coal Corp., USA 56 57 23 North Korea 58 59 24 Occidental, USA 60 61 25 Peabody Energy, USA 62 63 26 Pittsburgh & Midway Coal (Chevron) 64 65 27 Poland 66 67 28 Rio Tinto, Australia 68 69 29 RAG (Ruhrkohle AG), Germany 70 71 30 Russian Federation (not including FSU) 72 73 31 RWE, Germany 74 75 32 Sasol, South Africa 76 77 33 Singareni Collieries Company, India 78 79 34 UK Coal, UK 80 81 35 Ukraine 82 83 36 Westmoreland Coal, USA 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.4 84 85 37 Xstrata, Switzerland
    [Show full text]
  • The Profitable and Untethered March to Global Resource Dominance!
    Athens Journal of Business and Economics X Y GlencoreXstrata… The Profitable and Untethered March to Global Resource Dominance! By Nina Aversano Titos Ritsatos† Motivated by the economic causes and effects of their merger in 2013, we study the expansion strategy deployment of Glencore International plc. and Xstrata plc., before and after their merger. While both companies went through a series of international acquisitions during the last decade, their merger is strengthening effective vertical integration in critical resource and commodity markets, following Hymer’s theory of internationalization and Dunning’s theory of Eclectic Paradigm. Private existence of global dominant positioning in vital resource markets, posits economic sustainability and social fairness questions on an international scale. Glencore is alleged to have used unethical business tactics, increasing corruption, tax evasion and money laundering, while attracting the attention of human rights organizations. Since the announcement of their intended merger, the company’s market performance has been lower than its benchmark index. Glencore’s and Xstrata’s economic success came from operating effectively and efficiently in markets that scare off risk-averse companies. The new GlencoreXstrata is not the same company anymore. The Company’s new capital structure is characterized by controlling presence of institutional investors, creating adherence to corporate governance and increased monitoring and transparency. Furthermore, when multinational corporations like GlencoreXstrata increase in size attracting the attention of global regulation, they are forced by institutional monitoring to increase social consciousness. When ensuring full commitment to social consciousness acting with utmost concern with regard to their commitment by upholding rules and regulations of their home or host country, they have but to become “quasi-utilities” for the global industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Slavery Statement 2020 Modern Slavery Statement 2020
    Modern Slavery Statement 2020 Modern Slavery Statement 2020 Contents 2 Contact 3 Introduction 4 About CS Energy Our purpose Our values 5 Reporting criteria 1 & 2 Our organisational structure Our operations Our supply chain 8 Reporting criteria 3 Modern slavery risks in our operations and supply chain 9 Reporting criteria 4 Actions taken to assess and address our modern slavery risks 10 Reporting criteria 5 Assessing the effectiveness of our actions 11 Reporting criteria 6 Consultation with owned or controlled entities Contact Brisbane office and registered office CS Energy Limited Level 2, HQ North Tower 540 Wickham Street Fortitude Valley Qld 4006 PO Box 2227 Fortitude Valley BC Qld 4006 P: +61 7 3854 7777 E: [email protected] W: www.csenergy.com.au ABN 54 078 848 745 2 CS Energy Modern Slavery Statement 2020 Introduction CS Energy is proud to present our inaugural Modern Slavery Statement under the Australian Government’s Modern Slavery Act 2018. The statement covers all sites owned or operated by CS Energy (as outlined on page 6) for the financial year ending 30 June 2020. In FY2020, CS Energy spent more than $575 million on goods and services from almost 1,200 vendors. We recognise that a business with this procurement spend has an important role to play in helping to prevent modern slavery. Our immediate focus in FY2020 was to gain an understanding of the modern slavery risks in our supply chains and to establish processes for addressing those risks, with our analysis concluding that the risk in our supply chain is low.
    [Show full text]
  • Cerrejón Coal Mine Colombia
    Cerrejón coal mine Colombia Sectors: Coal Mining Active This profile is actively maintained Send feedback on this profile By: BankTrack Created before Nov 2016 Last update: May 19 2021 Contact: Alex Scrivener, Policy Officer, Global Justice Now Project website Status Planning Design Agreement Construction Operation Closure Decommission Sectors Coal Mining Location Status Planning Design Agreement Construction Operation Closure Decommission Website http://www.cerrejon.com/site/ About Cerrejón coal mine The Cerrejón coal mine in La Guajira, Colombia, is the largest in Latin America and one of the largest in the world. Its steady expansion since its founding in 1976 has led to the destruction of whole villages populated by local indigenous and Afro-Colombian people. The extracted coal is almost exclusively for export to rich countries with local people seeing few benefits. The mine is owned by three giant UK-listed mining companies: BHP Billiton, Anglo American and Glencore. All of which receive billions of pounds in finance from UK banks and pension funds. Roche, Chancleta, Tamaquitos, Manantial, Tabaco, Palmarito, El Descanso, Caracoli, Zarahita, Patilla. These are the names of just some of the communities that have been devastated or simply wiped off the map by the Cerrejón mining project. Latest developments Anglo American to exit from Cerrejon shareholding, BHP Group to follow Feb 25 2021 Glencore leaving, passing mining contracts to Republic of Colombia Feb 4 2021 Impacts Social and human rights impacts While the Cerrejón mining company's promotional material gives the impression that it is helping the displaced communities, the reality is that the mining company has used underhand tactics to buy off individuals and sow internal division within the communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Coal Mine Methane Country Profiles, June 2015
    Disclaimer The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency does not: a) Make any warranty or representation, expressed or implied, with respect to the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of the information contained in this report, or that the use of any apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report may not infringe upon privately owned rights; or b) Assume any liability with respect to the use of, or damages resulting from the use of, any information, apparatus, method, or process disclosed in this report. CMM Country Profiles CONTENTS Units of Conversions .............................................................................................................................................. i Executive Summary .............................................................................................................................................. ii Global Overview at a Glance ................................................................................................................................. ii Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Purpose of the Report ............................................................................................................................................. 2 Organization of the Report ................................................................................................................................... 2 1 Argentina ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa's Coalfields — a 2014 Perspective
    International Journal of Coal Geology 132 (2014) 170–254 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect International Journal of Coal Geology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijcoalgeo South Africa's coalfields — A 2014 perspective P. John Hancox a,⁎,AnnetteE.Götzb,c a University of the Witwatersrand, School of Geosciences and Evolutionary Studies Institute, Private Bag 3, 2050 Wits, South Africa b University of Pretoria, Department of Geology, Private Bag X20, Hatfield, 0028 Pretoria, South Africa c Kazan Federal University, 18 Kremlyovskaya St., Kazan 420008, Republic of Tatarstan, Russian Federation article info abstract Article history: For well over a century and a half coal has played a vital role in South Africa's economy and currently bituminous Received 7 April 2014 coal is the primary energy source for domestic electricity generation, as well as being the feedstock for the Received in revised form 22 June 2014 production of a substantial percentage of the country's liquid fuels. It furthermore provides a considerable source Accepted 22 June 2014 of foreign revenue from exports. Available online 28 June 2014 Based on geographic considerations, and variations in the sedimentation, origin, formation, distribution and quality of the coals, 19 coalfields are generally recognised in South Africa. This paper provides an updated review Keywords: Gondwana coal of their exploration and exploitation histories, general geology, coal seam nomenclature and coal qualities. With- Permian in the various coalfields autocyclic variability is the norm rather than the exception, whereas allocyclic variability Triassic is much less so, and allows for the correlation of genetically related sequences. During the mid-Jurassic break up Coalfield of Gondwana most of the coal-bearing successions were intruded by dolerite.
    [Show full text]
  • Fushun Four Page
    FUSHUN MINING GROUP CO., LTD. L IAONING PROVINCE Opportunities for Investment in Coal Mine Methane Projects A major coal producer, the Fushun Mining Group Company, Ltd. has one producing underground mine and one open-pit mine. Total coal production in the mining area is about 6 million tonnes of coal annually. The underground mine, Laohutai, drains about 100 million cubic meters (more than 3.5 billion cubic feet) of methane annually, and methane production from surface boreholes has also begun. Significant opportunity exists for expanding recovery and utilization of methane from surface and underground boreholes. The Fushun Mining Group Company, Ltd. seeks investment for expanding the production of methane from surface boreholes and combining it with a portion of the methane recovered from the Laohutai mine to meet the energy needs of the nearby city of Shenyang. Fushun Mining Group seeks investment from China and abroad to for the proposed coal mine methane development project described in this brochure. OVERVIEW OF THE FUSHUN MINING GROUP COMPANY LTD. CHINA Fushun Mining Area LIAONING The Fushun Mining Group Company Ltd. (informally known as the Fushun Mining Group) is a large state-owned coal enterprise with 26 subsidiaries. Located in the city of Fushun in northeastern China’s Liaoning Province, it is about 45 km from Shenyang, the capital of the province, and 126 km from Anshan, a major iron and steel manufacturing center. Although the Fushun area has produced coal for more than 100 years, an estimated 800 million tonnes of recoverable reserves remain. The Fushun Mining Group has total assets of 4.7 billion yuan ($US 566 million).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8: Colombia
    8 Colombia 8.1 Summary of Coal Industry 8.1.1 ROLE OF COAL IN COLOMBIA Coal accounted for eight percent of Colombia’s energy consumption in 2007 and one-fourth of total exports in terms of revenue in 2009 (EIA, 2010a). As the world’s tenth largest producer and fourth largest exporter of coal (World Coal, 2012; Reuters, 2014), Colombia provides 6.9 percent of the world’s coal exports (EIA, 2010b). It exports 97 percent of its domestically produced coal, primarily to the United States, the European Union, and Latin America (EIA, 2010a). Colombia had 6,746 million tonnes (Mmt) of proven recoverable coal reserves in 2013, consisting mainly of high-quality bituminous coal and a small amount of metallurgical coal (Table 8-1). The country has the second largest coal reserves in South America, behind Brazil, with most of those reserves concentrated in the Guajira peninsula in the north (on the country’s Caribbean coast) and the Andean foothills (EIA, 2010a). Its reserves of high-quality bituminous coal are the largest in Latin America (BP, 2014). Table 8-1. Colombia’s Coal Reserves and Production – 2013 Anthracite & Sub-bituminous & Total Global Indicator Bituminous Lignite (million Rank (million tonnes) (million tonnes) tonnes) (# and %) Estimated Proved Coal 6,746.0 0.0 67469.0 11 (0.8%) Reserves (2013) Annual Coal Production 85.5 0.0 85.5 10 (1.4%) (2013) Source: BP (2014) Coal production for export occurs mainly in the northern states of Guajira (Cerrejón deposit), Cesar, and Cordoba. There are widespread small and medium-size coal producers in Norte de Santander (metallurgical coal), Cordoba, Santander, Antioquia, Cundinamarca, Boyaca, Valle del Cauca, Cauca, Borde Llanero, and Llanura Amazónica (MB, 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Master Plan for Dealing with Fire, Subsidence and Rehabilitation in the Leasehold of Bccl
    STRICTLY RESTRICTED FOR COMPANY USE ONLY RESTRICTED The Information given in this report is not to be communicated either directly or indirectly to the press or to any person not holding an official position in the CIL/Government BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED MASTER PLAN FOR DEALING WITH FIRE, SUBSIDENCE AND REHABILITATION IN THE LEASEHOLD OF BCCL UPDATED MARCH’ 2008. CENTRAL MINE PLANNING & DESIGN INSTITUTE LTD REGIONAL INSTITUTE – 2 DHANBAD - 1 - C O N T E N T SL PARTICULARS PAGE NO. NO. SUMMARISED DATA 4 1 INTRODUCTION 11 2 BRIEF OF MASTER PLAN ‘1999 16 3 BRIEF OF MASTER PLAN ‘2004 16 CHRONOLOGICAL EVENTS AND NECESSITY OF 4 17 REVISION OF MASTER PLAN 5 SCOPE OF WORK OF MASTER PLAN 2006 19 MASTER PLAN FOR DEALING WITH FIRE 6 21 MASTER PLAN FOR REHABILITATION OF 7 UNCONTROLLABLE SUBSIDENCE PRONE 49 INHABITATED AREAS 8 DIVERSION OF RAILS & ROADS 77 9 TOTAL INDICATIVE FUND REQUIREMENT 81 10 SOURCE OF FUNDING 82 ` - 2 - LIST OF PLATES SL. PLATE PARTICULARS NO. NO. 1 LOCATION OF JHARIA COALFIELD 1 2 COLLIERY WISE TENTATIVE LOCATIONS OF FIRE AREAS 2 3 PLAN SHOWING UNSTABLE UNCONTROLLABLE SITES 3 4 LOCATION OF PROPOSED RESETTLEMENT SITES 4 5 PROPOSED DIVERSION OF RAIL AND ROADS 5 - 3 - SUMMARISED DATA - 4 - SUMMARISED DATA SL PARTICULARS MASTER PLAN’04 MASTER PLAN’06 MASTER PLAN’08 NO A Dealing with fire 1 Total nos. of fires 70 70 70 identified at the time of nationalisation 2 Additional fires identified 6 7 7 after nationalisation 3 No. of fires extinguished 10 10 10 till date 4 Total no.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy in Russia's Foreign Policy Kari Liuhto
    Kari Liuhto Energy in Russia’s foreign policy Electronic Publications of Pan-European Institute 10/2010 ISSN 1795 - 5076 Energy in Russia’s foreign policy Kari Liuhto 1 10/2010 Electronic Publications of Pan-European Institute www.tse.fi/pei 1 Kari Liuhto is Professor in International Business (specialisation Russia) and Director of the Pan- European Institute at the Turku School of Economics, University of Turku, Finland. His research interests include EU-Russia economic relations, energy relations in particular, foreign investments into Russia and the investments of Russian firms abroad, and Russia’s economic policy measures of strategic significance. Liuhto has been involved in several Russia-related projects funded by Finnish institutions and foreign ones, such as the Prime Minister’s Office, various Finnish ministries and the Parliament of Finland, the European Commission, the European Parliament, and the United Nations. Kari Liuhto PEI Electronic Publications 10/2010 www.tse.fi/pei Contents PROLOGUE 4 1 INTRODUCTION: HAVE GAS PIPES BECOME A MORE POWERFUL FOREIGN POLICY TOOL FOR RUSSIA THAN ITS ARMY? 5 2 RUSSIA’S ENERGETIC FOREIGN POLICY 8 2.1 Russia’s capability to use energy as a foreign policy instrument 8 2.2 Dependence of main consumers on Russian energy 22 2.3 Russia’s foreign energy policy arsenal 32 2.4 Strategic goals of Russia's foreign energy policy 43 3 CONCLUSION 49 EPILOGUE 54 REFERENCES 56 1 Kari Liuhto PEI Electronic Publications 10/2010 www.tse.fi/pei Tables Table 1 Russia’s energy reserves in the global scene (2008) 9 Table 2 The development of the EU’s energy import dependence 23 Table 3 The EU’s dependence on external energy suppliers 24 Table 4 Share of Russian gas in total primary energy consumption 26 Table 5 Natural gas storage of selected European countries 29 Table 6 Russia’s foreign policy toolbox 32 Table 7 Russia’s disputes with EU member states under Putin’s presidency 36 Table 8 Russia’s foreign energy policy toolbox 40 Table 9 Russia's potential leverage in the ex-USSR (excl.
    [Show full text]
  • Restructuring and Privatizing the Coal Industries in Central and Eastern Europe and the Cis
    RESTRUCTURING AND PRIVATIZING THE COAL INDUSTRIES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE AND THE CIS RESTRUCTURING AND PRIVATIZING THE COAL INDUSTRIES IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE AND THE CIS COPYRIGHT © 2000 WORLD ENERGY COUNCIL All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, electrostatic, magnetic, mechanical, photocopy, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the copyright holder. Published August 2000 by: World Energy Council 5th Floor, Regency House 1-4 Warwick Street London W1B 5LT United Kingdom WEC MEMBER COMMITTEES as at August 2000 Albania Hong Kong, China Paraguay Algeria Hungary Peru Argentina Iceland Philippines Australia India Poland Austria Indonesia Portugal Belarus Iran (Islamic Republic) Romania Belgium Ireland Russian Federation Bolivia Israel Saudi Arabia Botswana Italy Senegal Brazil Japan Singapore Bulgaria Jordan Slovakia Cameroon Kenya Slovenia Canada Korea (Republic) South Africa Chile Latvia Spain China (People's Republic) Libya/GSPLAJ Sri Lanka Congo (Democratic Republic) Lithuania Swaziland Côte d'Ivoire Luxembourg Sweden Croatia Mali Switzerland Czech Republic Mexico Syria (Arab Republic) Denmark Monaco Taiwan, China Egypt (Arab Republic) Mongolia Tanzania Estonia Morocco Thailand Ethiopia Namibia Trinidad & Tobago Finland Nepal Tunisia Macedonia (Republic) Netherlands Turkey France New Zealand USA Gabon Niger Ukraine Germany Nigeria United Kingdom Ghana Norway Uruguay Greece Pakistan Venezuela Yemen i WEC EAST-WEST EUROPEAN ENERGY PROGRAMME Group A "Commonwealth of Independent States" Chairman: H. E. Sergei B. Tulub, Minister of Energy, Ukraine Belarus: V. Gerasimov, Director General, Belenergo France: L. Charreyre, EDF Germany: H. Holfeld, Siemens, W. Strassburg, RWE Italy: U.
    [Show full text]