DOCSLIB.ORG

Annual Review of Critical Psychology Marxism And

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Annual Review of Critical Psychology Marxism And ANNUAL REVIEW OF CRITICAL PSYCHOLOGY ARCP 9 MARXISM AND PSYCHOLOGY editor Michael Arfken 2 Managing Editor Ian Parker Editorial Board International Advisory Board Alexandra Zavos, Athens, Greece Andrew Lock, Auckland, New Zealand Alex Bridger, Huddersfield, England Bernardo Jiménez-Domínguez, Guadalajara, Mexico Angel Gordo López, Madrid, Spain Conceição da Nogueira, Braga, Portugal Babak Fozooni, London, England Dennis Fox, Springfield MA, United States Brenda Goldberg, Manchester, England Don Foster, Cape Town, South Africa Calum Neill, Edinburgh, Scotland Eero Riikonen, Helsinki, Finland Christian Ingo Lenz Dunker, Sao Paulo, Brasil Esther Wiesenfeld, Caracas, Venezuela Christian Yavorsky, New York, USA Euclides Sanchez, Caracas, Venezuela Colleen Heenan, Leeds, England Gill Straker, Sydney, Australia Dan Heggs, Cardiff, Wales Grahame Hayes, Durban, South Africa David Harper, London, England Hanne Haavind, Oslo, Norway Deborah Marks, Leeds, England Ignacio Dobles, Oropeza San José, Costa Rica Diane Burns, Sheffield, England Isaac Prilleltensky, Florida, USA Elliot Cohen, Leeds, England Ivan Ivic, Belgrade, Serbia Erica Burman, Manchester, England Jill Bradbury, Durban, South Africa Eugenie Georgaca, Thessaloniki, Greece Joe Whittaker, Bolton, England Gill Aitken, Salford, England Kevin Kelly, Rhodes, South Africa Gill Craig, London, England Lois Holzman, New York, United States Haim Weinberg, San Diego, USA Maritza Montero, Caracas, Venezuela Helen Spandler, Preston, England Martha Augoustinos, Adelaide, Australia Ian Law, Adelaide, Australia Michael Billig, Loughborough, England Ilana Mountian, Manchester, England Morten Nissen, Copenhagen, Denmark Ingrid Palmary, Johannesburg, South Africa Ole Dreier, Copenhagen, Denmark Jane Callaghan, Northampton, England Pablo Fernandez-Christlieb, Mexico City, Mexico Jude Clark, Durban, South Africa Ron Coleman, Glasgow, Scotland Karen Ciclitira, London, England Sara Vataja, Helsinki, Finland Ken McLaughlin, Manchester, England Tod Sloan, Tulsa, USA Mihalis Mentinis, Caracol de Oventic, Chiapas, Mexico Tomás Ibáñez, Barcelona, Catalunya Pam Alldred, London, England Ute Osterkamp, Berlin, Germany Pauline Mottram, Liverpool, England Valerie Walkerdine, Cardiff, Wales Rob Evans, Birmingham, England Wendy Stainton Rogers, Milton Keynes, England Rose Capdevila, Milton Keynes, England Wolfgang Maiers, Berlin, Germany Sam Warner, Manchester, England Tom Billington, Sheffield, England Vera Marten, Manchester, England ANNUAL REVIEW OF CRITICAL PSYCHOLOGY 3 Annual Review of Critical Psychology Issue 9 Marxism and Psychology Editor Michael Arfken www.discourseunit.com SPECIAL ISSUE: MARXISM AND PSYCHOLOGY 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS table of contents Introduction Marxist Scholarship and Psychological Practice 6 Michael Arfken Marxism and Psychology Conference 2010 8 Ian Parker Articles Knowldge and Interest in Psychology: From Ideology to Ideology Critique 10 and Beyond Gordana Jovanović Reconstructing the Critique of Ideology: A Critical-Hermeneutic and 20 Psychological Outline Thomas Teo Re-Imagining Non-Domination: Troubling Assumptions in Psychoanalytic 28 Critical Theory Bogdan Popa The Role of Technology in Herbert Marcuse’ s Eros and Civilization 38 James McMahon Hidden Trends: Reason, Renunciation and Liberation in Marcuse’s 48 Appropriation of Hegel and Freud Elliott Buckland ANNUAL REVIEW OF CRITICAL PSYCHOLOGY 5 Meditation of the Socialist Dream: Psychoanalysis, Psychology, and the Political 58 Organization of a Discipline Gregory Flemming Marx in Lacan: Proletarian Truth in Opposition to Capitalist Psychology 70 David Pavón-Cuéllar To Sell Marx in North America is to Not Sell Marx 78 Brad Piekkola Ideology Beyond Marx: Shame, Disambiguation, and the Social Fashioning of 84 Reparation Steve Larocco The Malleable and Open Body: Emancipatory or Oppressive? 92 Clifford van Ommen and Vasi van Deventer Identity Recognition and the Normative Challenge of Crowd Psychology 100 Radu Neculau Marxian Currents in Latin and North American Community Psychology 110 Ravi Gokani The Development of Development: A Post-Marxist Analysis of the Development 118 of Hegemonic Developmental Psychology Joanna Wasiak Wresting Change as a Liberating Concept: Lessons Learned from Teen Moms in 126 a Liberation Psychology Workshop Colleen MacQuarrie, Emily Rutledge and Lorraine Begley Notes on Contributors 138 SPECIAL ISSUE: MARXISM AND PSYCHOLOGY 6 Introduction - MARXIST SCHOLARSHIP AND PSYCHOLOGICAL PRACTICE introduction michael arfken Marxist Scholarship and Psychological Practice By Michael Arfken, University of Prince Edward Island t is difficult to remember a time when so many people depression? Or another article that gives psychologists the from such a variety of backgrounds took to the streets tools they need to assist employers with kinder, gentler lay- Ito draw attention to the widening disparity between the offs? What do articles like this from a leading psychologi- promises and the products of our economic and political cal organization say about the relationship between modern institutions. As evidence continues to mount that our “ad- psychology and the existing economic order? vanced” nations not only accumulate massive amounts of wealth but also produce unprecedented inequalities in the Perhaps all this suggests is that modern psychology, like distribution of that wealth, a vocal contingent of the work- any other academic discipline, must operate within the con- ing class has, for the last few weeks, occupied financial dis- fines of the existing social order. Given that the financial tricts throughout the world. These protests have captured market periodically goes through natural fluctuations, the the imagination of a growing number of people who see best that psychology can hope to do is to alleviate some neither their aspirations nor their sense of justice embodied of the anxiety that emerges from these brief crises. From in some of the fundamental structures of modern society. such a perspective, the APA headlines are evidence not of psychology’s parochialism but of its willingness to ease the In the wake of the near total collapse of the global financial suffering of those who find themselves in an unfortunate set system, we are also witnessing a growing number of activ- of circumstances. ists, scholars, and practitioners who have begun to reflect on the relationship between certain academic disciplines and Yet there is another dimension to the relationship between dominant economic and political structures. Yet for those dominant economic structures and modern psychology that working within the discipline of psychology, the connection bears some scrutiny. It is clear that the roots of modern psy- between political economy and psychological knowledge is chology are supported by the same enlightenment rational- anything but transparent. For example, what are we to make ity that continues to sustain many of our modern institutions of an article on the front page of the American Psychologi- from liberal democracy to neoclassical economics. Given cal Association (APA) website that, at the height of the the symbiotic relationship that exists between psychology global recession, urged psychologists to brace for recession and these institutions, it seems inevitable that when one of ANNUAL REVIEW OF CRITICAL PSYCHOLOGY MICHAEL ARFKEN 7 these institutions begins to exhibit certain weaknesses other account of the conference activities institutions will step in to turn our attention to other matters. Thus, while the looming collapse of our financial structures Given the overwhelming success of this first conference, it could engender reflection on the legitimacy of the capitalist was agreed that every effort would be made to organize ad- mode of production, the APA headlines shift our attention ditional Marxism and Psychology conferences on a regular to matters that are less threatening to the existing state of basis and in a new location each time. We are pleased to affairs. announce that the second Marxism and Psychology Con- ference will be held from August 9-12, 2012 at the Univer- This suggests that a deeper relationship exists between our sidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo, located in economic structures and our scientific pursuits. In other Morelia, Michoacán, Western Mexico. Further information words, it is not only that psychological research and prac- regarding this conference can be found on the conference tice is financially supported by industries that have a vested website - http://marxpsyconference.teocripsi.com/. interest in maintaining the existing economic structure of society. At an even deeper level, the very idea of a disci- While the contributions to this issue draw on a wide range pline such as psychology that attempts to understand the of intellectual traditions, the three that figure most promi- mental structures occupying the spaces between people and nently are hermeneutics, critical theory, and psychoanaly- their environments or between people and other people ex- sis. This is not surprising given the influence that Marxism presses a logic that can only take capitalism as its point of has historically exerted on these traditions. What is truly departure. At this level, to make the relationship between striking is the breadth of topics that contributors address in economics and psychology thematic is to discover that what this issue. Against the background of these traditions, con- we refer to as psychology is simply a potent euphemism for tributors reflect on the role
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historical Thinking As a Tool for Theoretical Psychology on Objectivity Thomas Teo
    Part II Historical Approaches 9 Historical Thinking as a Tool for Theoretical Psychology On Objectivity Thomas Teo In this chapter, I discuss the relevance of historical thinking for theoretical and philosophical psychology. In particular, I am interested in how historical thought styles (Fleck 1979) can be used as tools for theoretical psychology. In the follow­ ing reconstructions, five approaches of historical thinking that contribute to an understanding of psychological problems are discussed: history of science, history of the present, history as reconstruction, history of the politics of difference, and historical psychology. I use the concept of objectivity as an example to demonstrate the relevance of these approaches to theoretical psychology. It should be mentioned that the relationship between the history of psychology, which may incorporate some of the above‐mentioned thought styles, and the theory of psychology, is a complicated one (Teo 2013). The term historical thinking encompasses more approaches than the subdiscipline of the history of psychology. I suggest that temporality and professional histories are not sufficient to theoretical thinking in psychology and that professional history, as important as it is, is only one element in the discussion of temporality. Rather, I recommend that theoretical psychologists should include various historical thought styles in their endeavors as they were developed by historians as well as philosophers, social scientists, and psychologists, many of whom have engaged in critical approaches to the problem. History of Science Histories of science are sometimes presented by trained historians, but also by scientists‐turned‐historians. In this thought style, history has primacy but there are often theoretical implications that have major consequences for various The Wiley Handbook of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology: Methods, Approaches, and New Directions for Social Sciences, First Edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Agnotology in the Dialectics of the History and Philosophy of Psychology
    23610.1177/0959354313504838Theory & PsychologyTeo TAP 53 04838 Comment Theory & Psychology 23(6) 840–851 Agnotology in the dialectics © The Author(s) 2013 Reprints and permissions: of the history and philosophy sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0959354313504838 of psychology tap.sagepub.com Thomas Teo York University Abstract It is suggested that Robinson’s (2013) arguments are based on a less than clear articulation of the relationship between the history and philosophy of psychology. After tackling the relationship between these two subdisciplines and conceptualizing them in a dialectic relationship from a programmatic point of view, consequences for writing and reading works in the history and philosophy of psychology are examined. Lessons learned from the reflections suggest that there are inherent conflicts between the two subdisciplines, that the history of psychology needs to reflect on its implicit assumptions as well as on relevance, and that the substance of philosophical psychology can be improved when an historical perspective is taken. Consequences for a critical history and philosophy of psychology are discussed. Keywords history, philosophy, pilosophy of science, theory Agnotology, the study of ignorance-making (Proctor & Schiebinger, 2008), could be a starting point for a response to Robinson’s (2013) concerns about ignorance. However, Robinson’s arguments are reasonable and I actually do not disagree with many of his remarks. Yet, I suggest that an analysis of the relationship between the history and phi- losophy of psychology clarifies some misunderstandings or misgivings. In approaching my own argument, I could choose an historical approach that reconstructs the trajectory of the history of psychology and the philosophy of psychology as differing thought styles and thought collectives (Fleck, 1935/1979); or I could tackle the problem philosophi- cally/systematically (theoretically) neglecting history.
    [Show full text]
  • Contemporary Psychology: APA Review of Books 0010-7549 February 2000, Vol
    Contemporary Psychology: APA Review of Books 0010-7549 February 2000, Vol. 45, No. 1, Pg. 60 - 62 History Is Beautiful! Review of: Psychology: Theoretical-Historical Perspectives. (1998) Robert W. Rieber, Kurt Salzinger Washington, DC: American Psychological Association ISBN: 1-55798-524-3, 509 pp. $39.95 (member); $49.95 (nonmember) Thomas Teo About the author(s): ROBERT W. RIEBER, Department of Psychology, John Jay College of Criminal Justice, and the Graduate Center, City University of New York. KURT SALZINGER, Department of Psychology, Hofstra University. THOMAS TEO, Department of Psychology, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M3J 1P3. Electronic mail may be sent to [email protected]. It is not surprising that in the areas of the history and theory of psychology one finds as many different positions, interests, and perspectives as there exist in other fields of psychology. However, most historians of psychology are united by attributing significance to the past as a source for understanding the form and content of contemporary psychology. And most theoreticians, or rather metatheoreticians, are united by the conviction that metatheory and theory play guiding roles in research. But what is the relationship between theoretical and historical psychology? This question is answered differently by insiders. Some believe that one can study metatheory without including history, whereas others argue that metatheory without historical knowledge is shortsighted. History, on the other hand, does not necessarily require metatheory, but if historians of psychology wish to study more than chronological data, then they must certainly learn from and about metatheory. In a Kantian mode one might argue that metatheory without history is blind, and history without metatheory is vain.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Epistemological Violence in the Empirical Social Sciences? Thomas Teo* York University
    Social and Personality Psychology Compass 4/5 (2010): 295–303, 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2010.00265.x What is Epistemological Violence in the Empirical Social Sciences? Thomas Teo* York University Abstract This article discusses the meaning of epistemological violence in the empirical social sciences. It is argued that the concept is closer to personal than to structural violence in that it has a subject, an object, and an action, even if the violence is indirect and nonphysical: the subject of violence is the researcher, the object is the Other, and the action is the interpretation of data that is presented as knowledge. Using a hypothetical example, the problem of interpretation in empirical research on the Other is discussed. Epistemological violence refers to the interpretation of social-scientific data on the Other and is produced when empirical data are interpreted as showing the inferiority of or problematizes the Other, even when data allow for equally viable alternative interpretations. Interpretations of inferiority or problematizations are understood as actions that have a negative impact on the Other. Because the interpretations of data emerge from an academic context and thus are presented as knowledge, they are defined as epistemologically violent actions. Problems, consequences, and practices surrounding this concept are discussed. Introduction Forty-one years ago, Galtung (1969) encouraged the conceptualization of ‘theoretically significant dimensions of violence that can lead thinking, research, and potentially, action, toward the most important problems’ (p. 168). Following this maxim, he developed the now famous distinction between personal and structural violence, arguing convincingly that structures such as social injustice can be understood as violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Personal Politics: the Rise of Personality Traits in The
    PERSONAL POLITICS: THE RISE OF PERSONALITY TRAITS IN THE CENTURY OF EUGENICS AND PSYCHOANALYSIS IAN J. DAVIDSON A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN PSYCHOLOGY YORK UNIVERSITY TORONTO, ONTARIO AUGUST 2020 © IAN J. DAVIDSON, 2020 ii Abstract This dissertation documents personality psychology’s development alongside psychoanalysis and eugenics, offering a disciplinary and cultural history of personality across the twentieth century. Using the psychological concepts of neurosis and introversion as an organizational framework, personality’s history is portrayed as one of “success:” a succession of hereditarianism and its politics of normativity; a successful demarcation of the science of personality from competing forms of expertise; and a successful cleansing of personality psychology’s interchanges with unethical researchers and research. Chapter 1 provides background for the dissertation, especially focusing on turn-of-the- century developments in the nascent fields of American psychology and the importation of psychoanalytic ideas. It ends with a look at Francis Galton’s eugenicist and statistical contributions that carved a key path for psychological testers to discipline psychoanalytic concepts. Part I details the rise of personality testing in the USA during the interwar years, while also considering the many sexual and gender norms at play. Chapter 2 tracks the varied places in the 1920s that personality tests were developed: from wartime military camps to university laboratories to the offices of corporate advertisers. Chapter 3 takes stock of popular psychoanalytic notions of personality alongside the further psychometric development of personality testing. These developments occurred at a time when American eugenicists— including psychologists—were transitioning to a “positive” form that emphasized marriage and mothering.
    [Show full text]
  • Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology
    Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology Thomas Teo Editor Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology With 13 Figures and 2 Tables Editor Thomas Teo Department of Psychology York University Toronto, ON, Canada ISBN 978-1-4614-5582-0 ISBN 978-1-4614-5583-7 (eBook) ISBN 978-1-4614-5584-4 (print and electronic bundle) DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-5583-7 Springer New York Heidelberg Dordrecht London Library of Congress Control Number: 2014931655 # Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are reserved by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. Exempted from this legal reservation are brief excerpts in connection with reviews or scholarly analysis or material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Duplication of this publication or parts thereof is permitted only under the provisions of the Copyright Law of the Publisher’s location, in its current version, and permission for use must always be obtained from Springer. Permissions for use may be obtained through RightsLink at the Copyright Clearance Center. Violations are liable to prosecution under the respective Copyright Law. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.
    [Show full text]
  • Empirical Race Psychology and the Hermeneutics of Epistemological Violence
    Empirical Race Psychology and the Hermeneutics of Epistemological Violence Thomas Teo Human Studies A Journal for Philosophy and the Social Sciences ISSN 0163-8548 Volume 34 Number 3 Hum Stud (2011) 34:237-255 DOI 10.1007/s10746-011-9179-8 1 23 Your article is protected by copyright and all rights are held exclusively by Springer Science+Business Media B.V.. This e-offprint is for personal use only and shall not be self- archived in electronic repositories. If you wish to self-archive your work, please use the accepted author’s version for posting to your own website or your institution’s repository. You may further deposit the accepted author’s version on a funder’s repository at a funder’s request, provided it is not made publicly available until 12 months after publication. 1 23 Author's personal copy Hum Stud (2011) 34:237–255 DOI 10.1007/s10746-011-9179-8 THEORETICAL PAPER Empirical Race Psychology and the Hermeneutics of Epistemological Violence Thomas Teo Published online: 15 June 2011 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011 Abstract After identifying the discipline of psychology’s history of contributing pioneers and leaders to the field of race research, epistemological problems in empirical psychology are identified including an adherence to a naı¨ve empiricist philosophy of science. The reconstruction focuses on the underdetermined rela- tionship between data and interpretation. It is argued that empirical psychology works under a hermeneutic deficit and that this deficit leads to the advancement of interpretations regarding racialized groups that are detrimental to those groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Subjectivity, Idols, and the Vicissitudes of Virtues in Science: Epistemic Modesty Versus Epistemic Grandiosity
    2 Academic Subjectivity, Idols, and the Vicissitudes of Virtues in Science: Epistemic Modesty Versus Epistemic Grandiosity Thomas Teo Epistemic subjectivity has been the nemesis of objectivity. To be more precise: Subjectivity has always been a dialectical part of objectivity (see Daston & Galison, 2007). Objectivity is not only an epistemic cate- gory, but also a value that guides science (Teo, 2018a). To demand from the subject to “be objective” is clearly a normative claim and shows the connection between epistemology and ethics, or, what one could label “epistemo-ethics.” Epistemic values become personal virtues once they are considered positive and embodied in concrete subjectivities. Scientists, implicitly and explicitly, have committed to various epistemic virtues over time. Traditional values may include academic freedom, honesty, transparency, truth, or objectivity, while critical researchers may emphasize truthfulness, and social, economic, and environmental justice as ideals of research. Whereas objectivity remains a widely endorsed value and virtue, epis- temic modesty is hardly mentioned in textbooks, the academic literature, T. Teo (*) Department of Psychology, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada e-mail: [email protected] © Te Author(s) 2019 31 K. C. O’Doherty et al. (eds.), Psychological Studies of Science and Technology, Palgrave Studies in the Teory and History of Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25308-0_2 32 T. Teo or seminars, although it is a value that emerges when understanding subjectivity in its full complexity, including a recognition of the histor- ical, cultural, and personal limitations of knowledge. While the histo- ricity and the personal limitations of knowledge apply to all sciences, culture-centric knowledge within a complex globalized world impacts the human sciences more deeply.
    [Show full text]
  • Meet the RGP Editors
    Meet the RGP Editors Wade Pickren earned his doctorate in psychology at the University of Florida, with concurrent training in the history of science. He served as the Founding Historian and Director of Archives at the American Psychological Association, as editor of History of Psychology, and President of the Society for General Psychology and the Society for the History of Psychology. He is the author/editor of eleven books and numerous peer-reviewed publications. Over the last 18 years, his scholarship has been a progressively deeper dive into the study of knowledge development and certification in historical/cultural context, with special emphases on race, ethnicity, and indigeneity. Constituent elements of this work include the enduring impacts of coloniality of being and knowledge on human thought and practice, as well as on the built and unbuilt environment. He is currently extending his search for knowledge and praxes otherwise, that is, in addition to the Western Enlightenment model of rationality, in order to create a pluriversal approach to psychological inquiry. Wade is deeply committed to inclusion and equity in the academy and all its processes, including scholarship and editing. Thomas Teo is a professor of psychology in the Historical, Theoretical, and Critical Studies of Psychology Program at York University (Toronto, Canada). Born in in London (England), he earned his Dr. phil. in psychology from the University of Vienna in Austria. From 1992 to 1995 he worked as a postdoc and then research scientist at the Max Planck Institute for Human Development and Education in Berlin, Germany. He started his professional track at York University in 1996.
    [Show full text]