DOCSLIB.ORG

Perspecta 47 the Yale Architectural Journal

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Perspecta 47 the Yale Architectural Journal MONEY PERSPECTA 47 THE YALE ARCHITECTURAL JOURNAL Fool’s Gold JT Bachman Each image in this series features pyrite (commonly known as fool’s gold) in a foreign yet mundane context. The meaning behind each image is intentionally vague, yet as a collection they are intended to evoke a discourse centered around the built environment, ambition, progress, happiness, and cost. Bachman graduated from the Yale School of Architecture in 2012. There is an elephant in the room. It sits at every client meeting. It chooses every material, sets the length of every cantilever, and decides the height of every tower. It contextualizes every style and every urban form. It destines some projects to paper, yet lays the foundation of every built work. From its roughest sketches to its finest details, architecture is a product of its financial environment. Can the Egyptian pyramids be disconnected from the monumental wealth of the pharaohs? Can the embellishments of the Baroque be separated from the openhanded patronage of the Catholic Church? Can the steel frames of Modernism be detached from the economic efficiencies of mass production? Formless itself, money forms architecture—but the academic community remains hesitant to broach the subject. Students are introduced to architecture through forms, materials, masters, and styles, but rarely through economic imperatives. Architects are notorious for underpaying interns, overspending budgets, and sacrificing fees to answer a higher calling than the bottom line: to be stewards of design quality and public welfare. Many designers pursue artful building above all else, maintaining that a great project is its own reward, but establishing value in the marketplace is an art in itself. Does architecture reach its potential when untethered from economic realities, or must it harness them to contribute meaningfully to the built environment? Money investigates architecture’s complex relationship with a subject we cannot afford to ignore. James Andrachuk Christos Chrisovalantis Bolos Avi Forman Marcus Addison Hooks August 2014 14 77 MONEY, VALUE, NOTGELD ARCHITECTS, BUILDING Nina Rappaport Phil Bernstein 85 21 INTERVIEW ROT MUNCHING ARCHITECTS Christo Mark Foster Gage 95 27 INTERVIEW WORK Thomas Gluck Peggy Deamer 105 40 INTERVIEW INTERVIEW Hasty Johnson and Jerry Lea Robert A. M. Stern 113 47 RICHARDSON’S DEATH, THE COST OF BUILDING TRASH AMES’S MONEY, AND Vivian Loftness THE BIRTH OF THE MODERN ARCHITECTURAL FIRM 51 Jay Wickersham and INTERVIEW Christopher Milford Gregg Pasquarelli 128 57 ECOTECTONICS? BUYING BRAND-NAME Alejandro Zaera-Polo BUILDINGS FOR RURAL REVITALIZATION IN JAPAN: 139 THE CASE OF KENGO KUMA’S WHAT’S ON THE FACE OF A COIN? HIROSHIGE ANDO MUSEUM Elisabetta Terragni Mira Locher 143 66 INTERVIEW INTERVIEW Robert Shiller Frank Gehry 147 68 A VALUE PROPOSITION ARTHUR ERICKSON: Kevin D. Gray MONEY, MEDIA AND CANADIAN ARCHITECTURE 155 Michelangelo Sabatino “ARCHITECT: WILL CRIT FOR COFFEE” THE ECONOMIES OF ARCHITECTURE Charles Holland 161 209 EATING PUBLICITY: DOHA: ARCHITECTURE THE POST-ACCUMULATION CITY IN THE AGE OF MEDIA Todd Reisz Peter Eisenman 219 166 MICRO-MANAGING PARANORMAL ACTIVITY: MESSINESS: ARCHI-SPECTRAL PRICING, AND THE REFLECTIONS ON THE COSTS OF A DIGITAL AESTHETICS OF AUSTERITY NON-STANDARD SOCIETY AOC Mario Carpo 172 227 INTERVIEW LAUNCH Cesar Pelli and Fred Clarke Keller Easterling 179 INTERVIEW Naomi R. Lamoreaux 185 THE ARCHITECTURE OF FINANCIALIZATION Kazys Varnelis 195 THE PRICE OF A PARADIGM David Ross Scheer 198 THE FISCAL TOPOGRAPHY OF THE SHRINKING CITY Brent Ryan and Lorena Bello 205 ARE WE THERE YET? A CALL TO ACTION FOR INNOVATION INVESTMENT Andrew Waugh and Michael Green WHAT’S ON THE FACE OF A COIN? Elisabetta Terragni 139 140 Buildings cost money and often a montage: an aerial overview with d’Habitation.5 The new coin matches appear on tender, be it Monticello on the lateral façade projected onto the up elevation and section, whereas the U.S. nickel or the White House ground and ships seen head-on.4 On the ancient one combines front and on twenty-dollar bills. How can the other end of the scale, relatively side elevations in one plane. The something so large and complex be small objects, such as the Temple of comparison draws on the essen- condensed into a token image, and Janus (the altar of peace), also find tially domestic pattern of the façade what does it reveal of its object? their place on coins, as do triumphal and the staggered arrangement of Key historical events—such as arches and pieces of sculpture. apartments (as only a section can going to war, founding institutions, reveal). Unintentionally perhaps, or entering a new era—have been the meaning of Janus in Roman commemorated on coins since antiquity and the significance of the antiquity. The tradition returned to Unité d’Habitation in modern culture full vigor in the Renaissance, when converge in the god’s connection to rebuilding the church of Saint Peter peace, the passage of time, the solar was celebrated in 1506. The medal year—remember Le Corbusier’s cast for the occasion preserves insistence on the cycle of night and Bramante’s original idea of the day in many of his drawings— project better than the surviving and the inauguration of a modern drawings or the building as it stands form of collective dwelling. today.1 What shape do buildings take Le Corbusier saw his Unité as and from what viewpoints are they directly connected with peace when represented on coins and medals? he argued against rearmament and In the medal for Saint Peter’s Previous page Medal commemorating the in favor of urban housing, including Caradosso depicted the “rock”— Beheading of the King and Queen of France, 21 the somewhat doubtful observation symbolic of Peter as the stone on January 1793 on the (future) Place de la Concorde. that freestanding high-rises would Above Brass Sesterce with the Colosseum, issued which Jesus built his church—which by Emperor Titus, 80 AD. be less vulnerable to bombard- was included in the cornerstone for ment than the traditional city. What the turreted and domed temple.2 links the ancient Roman coin of the Collecting the funds for the church’s While the difficulties of rep- Temple of Janus most closely with construction triggered a revolt in the resenting a building on the small the new rendering of the Unité is its Germanic lands and stirred Luther face of a coin are obvious, the great- detailing, the geometry of balconies into secession from Papal authority, est challenge lies in capturing its and windows that conjure the vision shaking the rock to its foundation. features to convey its public signifi- of peacetime domesticity that the Ironically the medal’s message cance. To introduce these issues, architect desired for postwar recon- celebrates consolidation while its I asked students in a course on struction in France.6 These buildings financing brought the Church to the visual studies at the Spitzer School were to shine with the “splendor of brink of schism. of Architecture at the City College of rough concrete” as the material most The figural relief on a coin is New York to design and cast a com- appropriate for the times. In reac- necessarily minimal and often crude, memorative image of a contemporary tion to the importance of concrete, but it is always related to three- building inspired by those on coins the coin was cast not in metal but in dimensional objects such as the coin and medals since antiquity. cement as a bearer of the material’s itself. Compressed into shallow relief, From among the attempts special significance. a building appears starkly abbreviated to capture the connection both and reduced to its defining features. of architecture to money and of a Typically a temple or an arch is seen building’s physical character to its in elevation with just a slight sugges- representation, the following experi- tion of depth, whereas monumental ments produced interesting results, structures such as the Colosseum or each showcasing a different set of a harbor require a synthetic image characteristics, in a different mate- combining different views.3 On the rial, and with a different technology Brass Sestertius issued by Titus in 80 in order to make the identity to its AD, the huge ellipse of the Colosseum object unmistakable. was captured in a dual representation Perhaps the most direct link that matches its elevation with a view between the key features of a build- into the crowded arena. The chal- ing and the intrinsic qualities of a lenge of imaging an entire harbor, as relief emerges in a comparison of it appears on the Neronian sesterce the Temple of Janus, in the Roman John Evans and Chad Richardson: Medal with of 64 AD, is approached by means of Forum, and Le Corbusier’s Unité Le Corbusier’s Unité d’habitation, Marseilles. ELISABETTA TERRAGNIELISABETTA WHAT’S A COIN? OF THE ON FACE building whose external shape gardens and palaces to affirm their betrays little about its nature and claim to a God-given rule over the purpose. Roman coin depictions of land. The vast views extending to the the second and third century AD horizon are transformed into a geom- combine the cylindrical shape of etry of power in which cardinal points the arena with a steep view to the enter into visual correspondence and interior, where corrida-like fights of override any other concern.10 The fact horsemen and animals took place.8 that spatial connections among build- Starting from such a composite ings prompted urban interventions image, other students sought to that ascertain dominion goes to show adapt the concept to an equally that the city fell into a kind of ano- intriguing contemporary structure, nymity while landmark buildings and Rem Koolhaas’s Seattle Public fortifications assumed a paramount Library.9 Its volumes are displaced role.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Historical Review Spring 2010 an Undergraduate Publication Lebkc[?š?Iik[( This Edition Is Dedicated in Loving Memory of Cameron Dabaghi
    The Yale Historical Review Spring 2010 An Undergraduate Publication Lebkc[??iik[( This edition is dedicated in loving memory of Cameron Dabaghi. Donors Founding Patrons In Memory of David J. Magoon Stauer Derek Wang Zixiang Zhao Founding Contributors Joe and Marlene Toot Yale Center for British Art Yale Club of Hartford Contributors Greg Weiss The Yale Historical Review is published by Yale College students. Yale University is not responsible for its contents. For information regarding submissions, advertise- ments, subscriptions, and contributions, or to provide feedback, please contact us at [email protected] or write to us at Yale Historical Review Yale University PO 207137 New Haven, CT 06520 or visit our website at www.yalehistoricalreview.org The Spring cover photograh was taken in 1962 by Eero Saarinen. (Yale Visual Resources Collection) The Yale Historical Review: An Editorial Board Undergraduate Publication exists to give Editor-in-Chief undergraduates an opportunity to have their Christopher Magoon, BK ‘11 exceptional work highlighted. It also aims to Managing Editor, Editor-at-Large encourage the diffusion of original historical Layne Johnson, SM ‘12 ideas on campus by providing a forum for Development Editor outstanding undergraduate history papers Josh Tannen, SY ‘11 covering any historical topic. Senior Essay Editors Josh Silverstein, JE ‘10 Advisory Board Ryan Lowe, MC ‘10 David Blight Norma Thompson Junior Seminar Editor Class of 1954 Professor of Director of Jessica Moldovan, SY ‘11 American History Undergraduate Studies, Freshman Paper Editor Humanities Michael Bisceglia, PC ‘12 John Gaddis Robert A. Lovett Professor Charles Edel Directed Studies Editor of History Graduate Student in Thomas Meyerson, BK ‘11 History Outside Editor Beverly Gage Joe Geylin, SM ‘11 Associate Professor of Stephen Prince Copy Editors History Graduate Student in Kate Liebman, BK ‘13 History Elinor Monahan, JE ‘13 Glenda Gilmore Peter V.
    [Show full text]
  • (M. Arch I '18) and Misha Semenov (M. Arch I & MEM
    The 2016 Spring term at the Yale School of Architec- Paprika! 4.14.16 ture is special as it convenes for the very first time XXIV four internationally acclaimed professors (Wolf D. Prix, Greg Lynn, Zaha Hadid, and Patrik Schumacher) who all ran, and in one case still runs, their individual master classes at the Angewandte in Vienna. While students used to commit to one professor for five years before the Bologna Reform, they now spend three years in one critic’s master class in order to obtain a Master’s degree. 1—Do you consider yourself a master since or because you ran a master class at the Angewandte? 2—Did or does this particular mode of teaching leave a mark on your pedagogy? Wolf D. Prix Zaha Hadid: AA Dipl. The editors issued the questions on Friday, March 11, Azza Abou Alam (M. Arch I ‘18) and but did not receive any feedback from Professor Hadid. Misha Semenov (M. Arch I & M.E.M ‘19) A Conversation in Memory of…? After waiting for up to an hour in line to attend last Thursday’s ‘Conversation in Honor of Zaha Hadid,’ students left Hastings Hall with mixed feelings. Some had heated conversations at the reception, attempting to decipher what just happened. Some were upset enough to put up posters in the reception area reassuring prospective students that some of the Yalies in the audience had found the talk unfulfilling. Our initial reaction, too, was one of shock: how could a conversation in honor of Zaha, a singular genius who for many stands as a symbol of the breakdown and diversification of the exclusive ‘upper circle’ of architects, one who means so much to women and minority designers around the world and in our school, so easily devolve into a conversation about the connec- tions, support networks, and old boys’ clubs that Gehry and Eisenman were a part of? Incensed, we drafted an article that condemned what we saw as a disrespectful conversation only tangentially related to Zaha.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Architecture 2001–2002
    School of Architecture 2001–2002 bulletin of yale university Series 97 Number 3 June 30, 2001 Bulletin of Yale University Postmaster: Send address changes to Bulletin of Yale University, PO Box 208227, New Haven ct 06520-8227 PO Box 208230, New Haven ct 06520-8230 Periodicals postage paid at New Haven, Connecticut Issued sixteen times a year: one time a year in May, October, and November; two times a year in June and September; three times a year in July; six times a year in August Managing Editor: Linda Koch Lorimer Editor: David J. Baker Editorial and Publishing Office: 175 Whitney Avenue, New Haven, Connecticut Publication number (usps 078-500) The closing date for material in this bulletin was June 20, 2001. The University reserves the right to withdraw or modify the courses of instruction or to change the instructors at any time. ©2001 by Yale University. All rights reserved. The material in this bulletin may not be repro- duced, in whole or in part, in any form, whether in print or electronic media, without written permission from Yale University. Open House All interested applicants are invited to attend the School’s Open House: Thursday, November 1, 2001. Inquiries Requests for additional information may be directed to the Registrar, Yale School of Architecture, PO Box 208242, 180 York Street, New Haven ct 06520-8242; telephone, 203.432.2296; fax, 203.432.7175. Web site: www.architecture.yale.edu/ Photo credits: John Jacobson, Sarah Lavery, Michael Marsland, Victoria Partridge, Alec Purves, Ezra Stoller Associates, Yale Office of Public Affairs School of Architecture 2001–2002 bulletin of yale university Series 97 Number 3 June 30, 2001 c yale university ce Pla Lake 102-8 Payne 90-6 Whitney — Gym south Ray York Square Place Tompkins New House Residence rkway er Pa Hall A Tow sh m u n S Central tree Whalley Avenue Ezra Power Stiles t Morse Plant north The Yale Bookstore > Elm Street Hall of Graduate Studies Mory’s Sterling St.
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2014 Constructs Yale Architecture
    Spring 2014 Constructs Yale Architecture 2 Conversation with David Adjaye 10 Stage Designs of Ming Cho Lee 17 2013 Building Project 24 Faculty News 3 Conversation between Pier Vittorio exhibition review by Richard Hayes Perspecta 46: Error reviewed by Tribute to Alvin Eisenman Aureli and Peter Eisenman 11 High Performance Wood by Stephanie Tuerk 26 Alumni News 4 Conversation with Dan Wood Alan Organschi 18 Book Reviews Yale School of Architecture Books 5 Conversation between Craig Buckley 12 Architectural Forum by Brent Sturlaugson Corrections and Collections by Joe Day Yale at ARCAM, Amsterdam and Marta Caldeira Architecture Dialogues by Surry Schlabs Close Up at a Distance by Laura Kurgan Norman Foster’s Yale building 6 “Exhibiting Architecture: A Paradox” 13 Representing Urban Decay by Elihu Rubin Paradise Planned by Stern, Fishman 28 Spring 2014 Calendar symposium review by Kevin Repp Yale Women in Architecture and Tilove 9 Everything Loose Will Land in 16 Spring 2014 Events Pedestrian Modern by David Smiley Los Angeles exhibition review by Exhibition: Archaeology of the Digital 20 Fall 2013 Lectures Joseph Giovannini Symposium: “Digital Post-Modernities: 22 Fall 2013 Advanced Studios From Calculus to Computation” 2 CONSTRUCTS YALE ARCHITECTURE David Adjaye London-based architect David Adjaye, the spring Lord Norman R. Foster Visiting Professor discusses his design approach. He gave the lecture, “Work” on January 9, 2014. Nina Rappaport As an artist’s architect, how did you transition from small-scale house and studio projects to public projects, such as the libraries in London and Washing- ton, D.C., and even larger urban projects? How did this trajectory increase your engagement with architecture as a public and social art? David Adjaye The trigger was a series of competitions being held in England at a time when the reinvention of the public realm 1 2 was being discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Draft-New Haven
    Tomorrow is Here: New Haven and the Modern Movement The New Haven Preservation Trust Report prepared by Rachel D. Carley June 2008 Funded with support from the Tomorrow is Here: New Haven and the Modern Movement Published by The New Haven Preservation Trust Copyright © State of Connecticut, 2008 Project Committee Katharine Learned, President, New Haven Preservation Trust John Herzan, Preservation Services Officer, New Haven Preservation Trust Bruce Clouette Robert Grzywacz Charlotte Hitchcock Alek Juskevice Alan Plattus Christopher Wigren Author: Rachel D. Carley Editor: Penny Welbourne Rachel D. Carley is a writer, historian, and preservation consultant based in Litchfield, Connecticut. All rights reserved, including the right of reproduction in whole or in part in any form. Rights to images in the collection of the New Haven Museum and Historical Society are granted for one- time use only. All photographs by Rachel Carley unless otherwise credited. Introduction Supported by a survey and planning grant from the History Division of the Connecticut Commission on Culture & Tourism, this overview of modern architecture and planning in New Haven is the first phase of a comprehensive project sponsored by the New Haven Preservation Trust. The intent is to investigate how and why the city became the center for one of the country’s most aggressive modern building programs of the post-World War II era, attracting a roster of internationally recognized architects and firms considered to be among the greatest leaders of the modernist movement. Although the architectural heritage of this city includes fine examples of early 20th- century contemporary design predating the war, the New Haven story relates most directly to the urban renewal years of the 1950s to 1970s and their dramatic reshaping of the city skyline during that period.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Urban History
    Journal of Urban History http://juh.sagepub.com/ Planning's End? Urban Renewal in New Haven, the Yale School of Art and Architecture, and the Fall of the New Deal Spatial Order Brian Goldstein Journal of Urban History 2011 37: 400 DOI: 10.1177/0096144211400382 The online version of this article can be found at: http://juh.sagepub.com/content/37/3/400 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com On behalf of: The Urban History Association Additional services and information for Journal of Urban History can be found at: Email Alerts: http://juh.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://juh.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://juh.sagepub.com/content/37/3/400.refs.html Downloaded from juh.sagepub.com at Harvard Libraries on April 14, 2011 Journal of Urban History 37(3) 400 –422 Planning’s End? Urban © 2011 SAGE Publications Reprints and permission: http://www. sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Renewal in New Haven, DOI: 10.1177/0096144211400382 the Yale School of Art http://juh.sagepub.com and Architecture, and the Fall of the New Deal Spatial Order Brian Goldstein1 Abstract This article argues that the movement against urban renewal emerged not only in the streets of American cities, but also in the halls of American universities. In response to the extensive redevelopment of New Haven in the 1950s and 1960s, students at the Yale School of Art and Architecture, and especially in the Department of City Planning, marshaled an extensive critique of their expanding university’s role in this top-down reconstruction.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Architecture 2002–2003 Uy3,20 School of Architecture July 30, 2002
    bulletin of yale university Periodicals postage paid university bulletin of yale New Haven ct 06520-8227 New Haven, Connecticut School of Architecture 2002–2003 July 30, 2002 School of Architecture bulletin of yale university Series 98 Number 6 July 30, 2002 Bulletin of Yale University The University is committed to basing judgments concerning the admission, education, and employment of individuals upon their qualifications and abilities and affirmatively seeks to attract Postmaster: Send address changes to Bulletin of Yale University, to its faculty, staff, and student body qualified persons of diverse backgrounds. In accordance with PO Box 208227, New Haven ct 06520-8227 this policy and as delineated by federal and Connecticut law, Yale does not discriminate in admis- sions, educational programs, or employment against any individual on account of that individual’s PO Box 208230, New Haven ct 06520-8230 sex, race, color, religion, age, disability, status as a special disabled veteran, veteran of the Vietnam Periodicals postage paid at New Haven, Connecticut era, or other covered veteran, or national or ethnic origin; nor does Yale discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. Issued sixteen times a year: one time a year in May, November, and December; two times University policy is committed to affirmative action under law in employment of women, a year in June and September; three times a year in July; six times a year in August minority group members, individuals with disabilities, special disabled veterans, veterans of the Vietnam era, and other covered veterans. Managing Editor: Linda Koch Lorimer Inquiries concerning these policies may be referred to Frances A.
    [Show full text]
  • Revolt and Reform in Architecture's Academy: Columbia and Yale in the 1960S
    Revolt and Reform in Architecture's Academy: Columbia and Yale in the 1960s William Charles Richards IV Richmond, Virginia A.B., Wheaton College, 2004 M.A., University of Virginia, 2006 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Art and Architectural history University of Virginia May 2010 Richard Wilson~"~ "~4 ~ Sheila Crane Elizabeth Meyer _____________ Dell Upton 11 @Copyright by William C. Richards IV All rights reserved May 2010 lll Abstract A critical reassessment of the scope and mission of architecture and planning education in the United States occurred between 1950 and 1970. In this period, a small but significant number of students and faculty at Columbia University and Yale University perceived design's dominant pedagogies to be outmoded and inflexible legacies of the Bauhaus and Beaux-Arts institutions. They identified campus expansion, race, and the "urban crisis" as the principle, if unexplored, concerns facing architectural practice by the late-1960s, which pedagogy and practice were loath to address. Through protests and curricular reform, students and faculty members ultimately founded an advocacy model for design practice, which engaged the contemporary and contextual issues that have become central to its academy today. Among urban universities, Columbia and Yale represented compelling cases of how urban history and architectural education intersected. The theory and practice of urban renewal took a specific form that students analyzed-first to replicate and then to critique. As urban violence peaked and riots transformed neighborhoods across the United States, it did not take long for even the most sheltered student to feel the effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Yale School of Architecture 2006-2007
    ale university July 30, 2006 2007 – Number 6 bulletin of y Series 102 School of Architecture 2006 bulletin of yale university July 30, 2006 School of Architecture Periodicals postage paid New Haven, Connecticut 06520-8227 ct bulletin of yale university bulletin of yale New Haven Bulletin of Yale University The University is committed to basing judgments concerning the admission, education, and employment of individuals upon their qualifications and abilities and affirmatively seeks to attract Postmaster: Send address changes to Bulletin of Yale University, to its faculty, staff, and student body qualified persons of diverse backgrounds. In accordance with PO Box 208227, New Haven ct 06520-8227 this policy and as delineated by federal and Connecticut law, Yale does not discriminate in admis- sions, educational programs, or employment against any individual on account of that individual’s PO Box 208230, New Haven ct 06520-8230 sex, race, color, religion, age, disability, status as a special disabled veteran, veteran of the Vietnam Periodicals postage paid at New Haven, Connecticut era, or other covered veteran, or national or ethnic origin; nor does Yale discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation. Issued seventeen times a year: one time a year in May, November, and December; two times University policy is committed to affirmative action under law in employment of women, a year in June; three times a year in July and September; six times a year in August minority group members, individuals with disabilities, special disabled veterans, veterans of the Vietnam era, and other covered veterans. Managing Editor: Linda Koch Lorimer Inquiries concerning these policies may be referred to Valerie O.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Architecture 2019–2020
    BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY BULLETIN OF YALE BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Periodicals postage paid New Haven ct 06520-8227 New Haven, Connecticut School of Architecture 2019–2020 School of Architecture 2019–2020 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 115 Number 10 August 5, 2019 BULLETIN OF YALE UNIVERSITY Series 115 Number 10 August 5, 2019 (USPS 078-500) The University is committed to basing judgments concerning the admission, education, is published seventeen times a year (one time in May and October; three times in June and employment of individuals upon their qualifications and abilities and a∞rmatively and September; four times in July; five times in August) by Yale University, 2 Whitney seeks to attract to its faculty, sta≠, and student body qualified persons of diverse Avenue, New Haven CT 0651o. Periodicals postage paid at New Haven, Connecticut. backgrounds. In accordance with this policy and as delineated by federal and Connecticut law, Yale does not discriminate in admissions, educational programs, or employment Postmaster: Send address changes to Bulletin of Yale University, against any individual on account of that individual’s sex, race, color, religion, age, PO Box 208227, New Haven CT 06520-8227 disability, status as a protected veteran, or national or ethnic origin; nor does Yale discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity or expression. Managing Editor: Kimberly M. Go≠-Crews University policy is committed to a∞rmative action under law in employment of Editor: Lesley K. Baier women, minority group members, individuals with disabilities, and protected veterans. PO Box 208230, New Haven CT 06520-8230 Inquiries concerning these policies may be referred to Valarie Stanley, Director of the O∞ce for Equal Opportunity Programs, 221 Whitney Avenue, 4th Floor, 203.432.0849.
    [Show full text]