Federal Reform: the End of the Beginning Or the Beginning of the End?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Federal Reform: the End of the Beginning Or the Beginning of the End? 5 Federal reForm: The end oF The Beginning or The Beginning oF The end? Emanuele Massetti On 28 July 2011, Roberto Calderoli, minister of the simplification of laws and regulations and a leading figure of the Lega Nord (LN, North- ern League), announced that “the implementation of the federalist reform can be considered, for its most relevant part, accomplished” and that “federalism becomes a completed and transparent system, as it had never been: a true federalism of which all citizens will feel the effects.”1 On 11 August, Roberto Formigoni, the regional president of Lombardy, a leading figure of the Popolo della Libertà (PdL, People of Liberty) and a strong advocate of fiscal federalism, declared: “Fiscal federalism has lost all its substance; it does not exist anymore.”2 These two contradictory statements are emblematic of the subject under discussion because they highlight two key points. First, while 2011 was supposed to be the crucial year for the completion of the legislative process on fiscal federalism, the fate of the reform is far from clear. Second, the reform remains deeply controversial from a political point of view, not only because of its substance, but also due to the propagandistic struggle it has given rise to. These two points are reinforced by the fact that the above dissension does not refer to a government-opposition disagreement or a North-South division: the two politicians are from the same region (Lombardy), both are strongly Italian Politics: From Berlusconi to Monti 27 (2012): 137–154 © Berghahn Books doi:10.3167/ip.2012.270108 138 Emanuele Massetti pro-reform, and both were part of the coalition that supported Silvio Berlusconi’s government until its fall on 12 November 2011. The main aims of this chapter are to provide some basic details on the content of the legislation, to explore its strengths and weak- nesses, to advance explanations about the latter, and to provide some informed speculation on its fate. The chapter is organized as follows. First, a brief summary of the “federalization” process of Italy is pre- sented, up to the approval of Law No. 42/2009, which initiated the current reform. Second, the content of the most salient legislative decrees approved in 2011 are analyzed. Third, an explanation of the outcome of the reform and, in particular, of its apparent shortcomings is presented. The main argument developed is that a party politics perspective can help us understand what may appear, from a pub- lic policy point of view, as a series of contradictions between stated objectives and actual legislative provisions. Finally, the chapter con- siders the likely fate of federalism in Italian politics, both in its institu- tional and fiscal dimensions. The Politics of Territorial Reform in Italy and Fiscal Federalism The issue of regional autonomy and, more generally, of the center- periphery allocation of powers and resources has always been very important in Italian politics. The 1948 Constitution tried to settle the question by introducing a regime of asymmetric regionalism in which special-status regions (RSSs)—the main islands (Sicily and Sardinia) and three border regions with linguistic minorities (Trentino-Alto Adige, Valle d’Aosta, and Friuli-Venezia Giulia)—were granted exten- sive autonomy and the immediate creation of elective regional repre- sentatives, while the remaining “ordinary” regions (RSOs) were left to wait for legislation in order to elect their representative governing bodies and to take up a limited set of (mainly administrative) com- petencies. The delaying of such legislation and the “South Tyrolean question”3 kept the issue of territorial reforms in the political debate until at least the early 1970s. It is only in the so-called Second Repub- lic, however, that territorial reforms and the idea of federalism become central, permanent, and (at least superficially) widely supported points in the political agenda. This qualitative shift has a precise origin: the breakthrough in 1992 of a new political force, the LN, in the national party system; its persistence, between highs and lows, as a relevant actor ever since; and the reactions of the other parties to it. A good understanding of the League’s political style, ideology, objectives, Federal Reform 139 strategy, and tactical choices is therefore crucial when examining fed- eral reforms in Italy. As noted by Lieven De Winter,4 the policy success of regionalist parties is often due not so much to their direct legislative activities but to their capability to affect the political agenda by pushing statewide parties to pass territorial reforms. The history of the LN up to 2008 appears to confirm this general trend. Indeed, although they were not directly passed by the LN, the reforms undertaken between 1997 and 2001 are remarkable. The Bassanini laws (1997–1998) clarified and reinforced the sub-national institutional competences. The reform of the regional electoral law (1999), including the direct election of the regional president, strengthened the regions from a political point of view. Finally, the 2001 constitutional reform recognized regions and local governments as constituent parts of the Republic (new Art. 114), increased the legislative competences of the regions by listing those reserved to the state and those under shared competence (new Art. 117), opened the way for further devolution of powers to any indi- vidual regions making requests in that respect (new Art. 116), and prescribed the implementation (under the constraint of national soli- darity) of financial and fiscal autonomy for the regions and the local governments (new Art. 119). As regards the question of financial and spending autonomy, the regions had already made considerable prog- ress before the 2001 constitutional reform. The establishment of the regional tax on production activities (IRAP) in 1997 gave the regions a substantive source of revenue, although the level of the tax remained under the state competence. Moreover, the regions obtained for the first time a share, albeit a limited one (0.5 percent), of income tax (IRPEF). Of greater significance was the reform adopted in 2000 that introduced a share of VAT and of the fuel tax, as well as an increase in the share of IRPEF up to 1.4 percent. These new revenues freed the regions from most direct transfers from the state, ensuring a very large degree of freedom in the allocation of regional spending. As the main advocate of territorial reforms, the League must of course take an important share of the credit for the changes intro- duced. On the other hand, it must be noted that the LN not only strongly criticized those reforms but also, when it had been part of the governing coalition (in 1994 and from 2001 to 2006), never succeeded in getting its own proposals passed. This seems to have represented a huge problem for the party, which since its foundation has promised to lead and deliver (and not simply to stimulate and control) the “federal revolution.” It has become rather evident in the last 10 years that the League is eager to present itself as the only party capable of bringing about real territorial reforms, at least as much as it is interested in the 140 Emanuele Massetti content and likely impact of such reforms. In view of this, it is rather paradoxical that the LN opposed the 2001 constitutional reform, even calling for a referendum to reject it. It is also interesting to note that the “reform of the reform” (the so-called devolution reform) voted for by the League together with the center-right coalition (2001–2006)— and then rejected by voters in a June 2006 referendum—would have not represented a major step forward toward regional empowerment. Indeed, while this reform tried to provide the regions with exclu- sive legislative powers in health, education, and local policing, it also envisaged the recentralization of competences in other important areas. First, the exclusive power over transport and national distribu- tion of energy would have gone back to the state. Second, the principle of “national interest,” allowing central institutions to block regional laws, would have been introduced. Third, the possibility for regions to negotiate individually for further devolution of powers would have been abolished. Finally, at a more symbolic level, a new territorial unit called “Rome Capital City” would have been created and the principle of “national indivisibility” explicitly stated. When the League returned to office after the 2008 general election with its best general election result since 1996, its key policy proposal was fiscal federalism.5 On the one hand, this stated policy represented a sort of return to the LN’s roots, as the party’s earlier electoral suc- cesses in the 1990s were built on a policy platform advocating fed- eralism. On the other, it is also worth emphasizing that, in spite of more or less substantive tactical shifts—from federalism to “Padanian secession” and then from the latter to “devolution”—the objective of retaining resources in the productive and rich regions of the North has always remained at the center of the League’s political action (or at least of its rhetoric). As a matter of fact, a look at regional finances shows, as largely expected, considerable differences across Italy. Yet it must be noted that such differences concern not only the divide between North and South, but also, and perhaps more importantly, the one between RSOs and RSSs.6 For instance, beyond the presence of huge gaps in fiscal capacity and, as a consequence, important inter- regional financial transfers, the political debate has also concerned the quality of regional spending. The League’s discourse has pointed to the putative inefficiency of regional spending in southern, net-receiver regions. While a full assessment of spending efficiency would require not only an assessment of regional spending but also an evaluation of the quality of services provided, what emerges from the data on spend- ing allocation is that the most striking difference is again between RSOs and RSSs, rather than between North and South.
Recommended publications
  • CALENDRIER Du 06 Au 19 Avril 2009
    MEMO/09/149 Bruxelles, le 03 avril 2009 CALENDRIER du 06 au 19 avril 2009 (susceptible de modifications en cours de semaine) Activités des Institutions Déplacements et visites Lundi 06 avril Conseil "Justice et affaires intérieures" Mrs Margot WALLSTRÖM in Bulgaria: speaks at Conference (06-07) "Women in Bulgaria and European Politics" with Ms Gergana PASSY, Minister of European Affairs; speaks at meeting on the ACP-EU Joint Parliamentary Assembly role of young people in political life together with Mr Sergey (04-09, Prague) STANISHEV, Bulgarian Prime Minister in the Aula Maxima, University of National and World Economy; speaks at Session of the European Affairs Committee in Parliament; takes part in a bloggers' discussion "European Elections 2009: Yes I can" organised by the Bulgarian Branch of Café Babel Mr Antonio TAJANI participates in the opening ceremony of the project "Inter-Cultural Approaches for Road Users Safety" (ICARUS) to be held at the presence of the Italian Minister of the Interior, Mr Roberto MARONI (Rome) Speech by Mr Joaquín ALMUNIA a the DG ECFIN Seminar 'Towards a European Foreign Economic Policy' (Brussels) Mr Ján FIGEL' participates in the Second Forum of the UN Alliance of Civilizations (05-06, Instanbul) Mr Vladimír ŠPIDLA meets Ms Fani PALLI-PETRALIA, Greek Minister of Employment Mr Vladimír ŠPIDLA meets Mr Yannis PAPATHANASIOU, Greek Minister of Economy and Finance Mr Vladimír ŠPIDLA meets Mr Prokopis PAVLOPOULOS, Greek Minister of Interior Ms Catherine ASHTON participates in the High-Level Round Table Discussion on Aid for Trade (06-07, Lusaka) Mr Andris PIEBALGS delivers a speech at the conference "The role and responsibilities of local authorities in implementing EU Energy policy" (Riga) M.
    [Show full text]
  • Everyday Intolerance- Racist and Xenophic Violence in Italy
    Italy H U M A N Everyday Intolerance R I G H T S Racist and Xenophobic Violence in Italy WATCH Everyday Intolerance Racist and Xenophobic Violence in Italy Copyright © 2011 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-746-9 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org March 2011 ISBN: 1-56432-746-9 Everyday Intolerance Racist and Xenophobic Violence in Italy I. Summary ...................................................................................................................... 1 Key Recommendations to the Italian Government ............................................................ 3 Methodology ................................................................................................................... 4 II. Background ................................................................................................................. 5 The Scale of the Problem ................................................................................................. 9 The Impact of the Media ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Berlusconi and His Crew Published on Iitaly.Org (
    Berlusconi and His Crew Published on iItaly.org (http://www.iitaly.org) Berlusconi and His Crew E. M. (May 09, 2008) Prime Minister Berlusconi inaugurates his fourth term and announces his ministerial posts. The choices for his circle of 21 ministers reveal some predictable tactical determinations, while a few of his newbies have yet to prove their political value. No one can accuse the PM of having assembled a boring cast The 60th Italian government since the end of the Second World War was sworn in on Thursday. In a ceremony led by President Giorgio Napolitano, Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi and 21 ministers of his center-right cabinet pronounced a solemn oath on the Italian Constitution. It marks the media tycoon’s fourth non-consecutive term as head of government. Berlusconi’s new cabinet rallies figures from various right-wing parties, and among them, many familiar faces. Gianni Letta, the PM’s close business and political aide, was named Cabinet Secretary, and according to Berlusconi is “a gift from God to all Italians”. Umberto Bossi [2], famously at the helm of the anti-immigration Northern League [3] party—a man stalwartly and controversially in Page 1 of 3 Berlusconi and His Crew Published on iItaly.org (http://www.iitaly.org) favor of a federalist system that gives greater autonomy to the North—will be minister of reforms. Roberto Calderoli [4], also of the Northern League and Berlusconi’s former minister of reforms, is now in charge of “simplification” (in other words, simplifying the Parliament and reducing its costs). Calderoli is best known in the media for having upset Muslims when he proposed pigs be brought in to discourage plans for the construction of a new mosque in Bologna and unbuttoning his shirt to reveal underneath, a t-shirt bearing an offensive cartoon of the Prophet Muhammad, setting off violent demonstrations in Libya.
    [Show full text]
  • The Persistence of Corruption in Italy
    The Persistence of Corruption in Italy: Politicians and the Judiciary since Mani Pulite Raffaele Asquer Department of Political Science University of California, Los Angeles Paper prepared for the WPSA 2013 ANNUAL MEETING March 28th, 2013 PRELIMINARY DRAFT – PLEASE DO NOT CITE OR CIRCULATE 1 Abstract Starting in 1992, the Mani Pulite (“Clean Hands”) anti-corruption campaign promised to eradicate corruption from Italian political life. For a brief, yet intense period, the public rallied behind the prosecutors, and punished the allegedly corrupt politicians and parties at the polls. However, twenty years later, Italy is still ranked as highly corrupt by Western standards. Why, then, did the Mani Pulite campaign fail to have a long-lasting effect? Relying on original data on the anti-corruption investigations in Milan, as well as on a variety of datasources from the existing literature, this paper argues, first, that the investigations left essentially untouched entire parts of the country where corruption was widespread. Overall, the Mani Pulite campaign had limited deterring effects because judicial inquiries were obstructed by the statute of limitations, and even in case of conviction the sentences were generally mild. Second, the paper finds that the structures of corruption networks have changed since the Mani Pulite season, becoming less vulnerable to further judicial inquiries. There now seem to be multiple sites for corrupt transactions, somewhat dispersed throughout the political system, whereas in the past such activities were centrally managed by a cartel of parties. We reach this conclusion by combining evidence from the literature with original data on two subnational legislatures, the Regional Council of Campania (1992-94) and the Regional Council of Lombardy (2010-12) in which political malfeasance in general seemed widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Gay, Sexist, Racist: Backwards Italy in British News Narratives
    Filmer, D 2018 Anti-Gay, Sexist, Racist: Backwards Italy in British News Narratives. Modern Languages Open, 2018(1): 6, pp. 1–21, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3828/mlo. v0i0.160 ARTICLE Anti-Gay, Sexist, Racist: Backwards Italy in British News Narratives Denise Filmer University of Catania, IT [email protected] The Berlusconi years have witnessed Italy placed in the uncomfortable spotlight of the international media; however, now that Berlusconi’s power has waned, a timely reflection is due on the extent to which the vestiges of the former Premier’s cultural have coloured images of Italy in British news discourse. How far do cultural myths influence the selection, narration and reception of Italian news reported in British newspapers? Do Berlusconi’s verbal gaffes reverberate in the construal of newsworthiness and evaluative parameters, reinforcing and perpetuating stereotypes of Italians as a whole? These are the key issues this contribution attempts to address. Stemming from a broader research project on the representation of Berlusconi’s non politically correct language in the British press, this study examines the representation of certain aspects of Italian culture that have been the focus of British news narratives in recent years. Four recurring themes are explored and discussed: homophobia, racism, sexism and fascism. Implementing a critical discourse analysis approach, news texts retrieved from a cross-section of British newspapers reporting on Italian affairs are examined. The analysis then focuses on the invisibility of translation in reconstructing discursive events in news narratives across cultural and linguistic barriers, and suggests that decisions taken in translation solutions can reproduce and reinforce myths or stereotypes.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Paul Imbarlina Thesis Final.Pdf
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF SPANISH, ITALIAN, AND PORTUGESE L’ALTRO IN ITALIA: UNA TRADUZIONE E ANALASI CRITICA THE OTHER IN ITALY: A TRANSLATION AND CRITICAL ANALYSIS PAUL IMBARLINA Spring 2012 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree in Accounting with honors in Italian Reviewed and approved* by the following: Sherry Roush Associate Professor of Italian Thesis Supervisor Maria Truglio Associate Professor of Italian Honors Adviser * Signatures are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. ABSTRACT Today, Italy contains one of the most rapidly changing populations of the European Union. Currently, 7.2% of Italy’s 60 million residents are non-citizens. Recent demographic data trends towards a large demographic shift in Italy society. One of every six babies delivered was born to a foreign born immigrant in 2008. This wave of immigration, especially the segment arriving from Africa, has not been integrated smoothly into Italian society, however. Because of a prevailing xenophobic attitude in Italy, immigrants have been greeted with prejudice and even acts of violence. Thus, immigrants have become the “other” in Italy. The purpose of this thesis is to uncover “othering” in Italy and its origins through the translation of a work of a respected Italian journalist (Gian Antonio Stella). Additionally, this thesis offers a reflection on the process of translation. i TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT..………………………………………………………………………………..i TABLE OF CONTENTS……………………………………………………………………ii
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of the Padanian Nation: Corruption, Hegemony, Globalization And
    The making of the Padanian Nation: Corruption, Hegemony, Globalization and Legitimacy Sinan Celiksu Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy under the Executive Committee of the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2014 ©2014 Sinan Celiksu All rights reserved ABSTRACT The making of the Padanian Nation: Corruption, Hegemony, Globalization and Legitimacy Sinan Celiksu This dissertation examines the relationship between state failures and state legitimacy in Italy. The study is based on a one-year ethnographic field research in Varese City. The political party Northern League and its followers (Leghisti) has been chosen to observe the state-society relationships. It has been discovered that among others, three factors were instrumental in the process by which the state-society relationships has been deteriorated so as to open the path for an alternative legitimacy claim such as Padanian nationalism. Initially, revelations of political corruption and illegal state practices, failure of the state to address problems related to globalization such as global economic integration and uncontrolled immigration were instrumental. Later, struggle of hegemony and subjugation between the League and the state has been another important cause for deteriorated relationships. This study also provides qualitative data on the processes by which those deteriorated relationships and state failures contributed the rise of xenophobia and suggests that this failures of the state coupled with the problems brought about by the uncontrolled immigration and global economic expansion is likely to open a path for criminalization of both immigrants and local people. Table of Contents LIST OF GRAPHS, IMAGES, AND ILLUSTRATIONS ...........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The President During the So-Called Second Republic: from Veto Player to First in Command?
    Selena Grimaldi University of Padova The President during the so-called Second Republic: from veto player to first in command? Abstract The role of the Head of State in parliamentary democracies is not taken into consideration by Lijphart, although it might become fundamental when representative institutions are unstable or unable to decide. With the Italian case in particular, the President can turn into both a powerful veto player for the government and a sort of deputy chairman. From Scalfaro to Napolitano all the presidents have had a great impact on the political scene, especially, when governments and parties have seemed to be particularly weak. So far, scholars have debated on systemic features having caused the enlargement of presidential powers, but there have apparently been few attempts to consider presidential involvement in the decision process as an aspect of the questionable change from one model of democracy to the other. Taking into account Lijphart's framework, the paper explains why the presidency can be considered as an institution in tension between the consensual and the majoritarian pole. 1 Introduction The variables chosen by Lijphart (1999) to differentiate a consensual democracy from a majoritarian one have been criticized by many scholars (Nagel 2000) especially because the reason for their selection is not clear. This defect is particularly true for "the federal-unitary dimension [... which] considers the instances in which bodies other than the government are involved in the decision process" (Blondel, Battegazzore 2003, 12). The role of the Head of State in parliamentary democracies, for instance, is not taken into consideration by Lijphart, although it might become fundamental when representative institutions are unstable or unable to decide.
    [Show full text]
  • Padania - Utopia Or Reality
    JULY - DECEMBER 1996 23 Padania - Utopia or Reality Vilctor radie In early August 1996, the striking double porters of this idea. Some claimed that Bossi was of the Lega Nord (Northern League), Umberto deliberately holding out for more but would be Bossi and Irene Pivetti, the young Speaker of the satisfied with less, i.e. that he was demanding sepa- House of Representatives, suddenly parted ways. ration from Italy in order to obtain a federation. After the last Parliamentary elections in Italy, in However, it was shown that Bossi genuinely April 1996, Bossi and Pivetti always appeared to- wanted more than a federation, when, about a year gether at all meetings and rallies of the Lega Nord. ago, he started to speak openly about the possi- Bossi remained true to his idea of detaching the bility of seceding. northern part of Italy from the rest of the country Taking advantage of the involvement of and turning it into a separate geopolitical entity. other political leaders in their own power Actually, Bossi initially upheld a federative idea, struggles, during the electoral campaign he openly which Pivetti endorsed, together with the other endorsed the separation of the northern part from members of the League. However, when Bossi the rest of Italy and called for the establishment radicalized his ideas to the extreme, calling for of the state of Padania, a name derived from the the partition of northern Italy, Pivetti dissociated fertile region along the River Po (Lat. Padus), herself from him and left the leadership of the even naming September 15th, 1996, as the date Lega Nord.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of Mission to Italy on Racial Discrimination, with a Focus on Incitement to Racial Hatred and Discrimination
    Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Report of mission to Italy on racial discrimination, with a focus on incitement to racial hatred and discrimination 28 January – 1 February 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY ............................................................................. 2 II. OVERVIEW OF RELEVANT NATIONAL LAW AND INSTITUTIONS .............................. 3 III. MAIN FINDINGS .................................................................................................................... 6 A. Institutional issues ................................................................................................................ 6 B. Disaggregated data ................................................................................................................ 7 C. Incitement to racial hatred, discrimination and violence ...................................................... 9 D. Law enforcement ................................................................................................................ 12 E. Economic, social and cultural rights ................................................................................... 14 (i) Education ......................................................................................................................... 15 (ii) Adequate housing ............................................................................................................ 17 (iii) Employment, health and social services .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The First Two Years of Berlusconi's Fourth Government: Activity And
    Bulletin of Italian Politics Vol. 2, No. 1, 2010, 121-36 The First Two Years of Berlusconi’s Fourth Government: Activity and Legislative 1 Performance Francesco Marangoni University of Bologna Abstract: On 8 May 2010, Silvio Berlusconi’s fourth government came to the end of its first two years in office. In this article, we aim to offer an initial analysis of the Government’s ‘performance’ after this period of time, using its legislative activity as the empirical angle of vision, and providing a number of indicators concerning the initiatives and legislative outcomes of the Italian executive during these two years. The volume of legislative proposals produced by the Berlusconi government, and the instruments used to pilot them through Parliament; the topics, issues and policy sectors on which the Cabinet has chosen to focus its legislative activity; the degree of overlap between the Government’s legislative proposals and the goals proclaimed in the manifesto presented by the centre-right coalition during the election campaign of 2008; the success rate of Government bills in this first part of the XVI legislative term: these are the main dimensions of analysis on which the various sections of the paper are focused. Keywords: Berlusconi government, government performance, legislative activity, programme for government On 8 May 2010, Silvio Berlusconi’s fourth government came to the end of its first two years in office. It had exercised full powers for 730 days, a period of time which, in view of the chronic instability that has long been a feature of Italian governments, places Berlusconi IV in fifth place in an imaginary classification of the duration of the executives of the Italian republic.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 [Forthcoming in R. Kaiser and J. Edelmann, Eds., Crisis As A
    1 [forthcoming in R. Kaiser and J. Edelmann, eds., Crisis as a Permanent Condition? The Italian Political System Between Transition and reform Resistance, Nomos, 2015] A Crisis of Italian Identity? The Northern League and Italy’s Renationalization Since the 1990s Silvana Patriarca Fordham University The term “crisis” to refer to the state of Italian politics has been circulating for quite a long time and one must wonder whether it is really helpful if we want to describe, not to mention explain, what would indeed seem to have become a permanent condition. The word may have lost meaning also in relation to the embattled issue of Italian national identity. Is there an “inherent,” or intrinsic, crisis of national identity in Italy? In the 1990s, after the emergence of the Northern League, a party that attacked national unity and attempted to create an alternative identity for the inhabitants of the northern regions, many academics and commentators insisted on the fragility of national identification in Italy. Rivers of ink were devoted to the topic and anxieties about the capacity of the nation to hold together were strong.1 Yet in more recent years and in spite of the presence of the Northern League in a right-wing coalition in government for most of the 2000s, the sense of national identity appears, if anything, stronger. In fact the very presence of the Northern League, in spite of its ideology, may have contributed to this strengthening and thus to what I would call the renationalization of the political field. 1 Among the titles of this large literature one can recall G.
    [Show full text]