Newsletter, Summer, 2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Newsletter, Summer, 2012 1685 + 445 1685 + 409 1685 + warm9 Summer !"#! 1685Inside: + cool9 !"#$ News Briefs Drawing from the Past: Welcome New Directors Interpreting the Slave Quarters Structural Repairs Complete ne of the Royall House and Slave Quarters’ greatest assets is also its greatest mystery: the free-standing brick and frame Making Slavery History Ooutkitchen and slave quarters, which stands a mere thirty feet Volunteer Spotlight from the main house. This building provides tangible evidence of the reality of northern colonial slavery and offers our visitor an experi- New in the Shop ence that is unique to this site. However, for all its power, much about the structure prevents us from understanding this building as the enslaved Africans who lived and worked 2012 Season Tour Hours there would have. In the May 26 through coming year, the mu- November 4 seum’s board members Saturdays and Sundays Tours at 1:00, 2:00, 3:00, and staff plan to explore and 4:00 p.m. new ways of bringing this structure to life that will Admission allow for a more complex Members are FREE interpretation of the lives Adults $7 Seniors and Students $5 of the Royalls’ enslaved Children under 18 $4 residents. Families $16 Eighteenth-century documentation of the Slave Quarters is limited to its presence on a map drawn by Henry Pelham in 1777. This incredi- Royall House and Slave Quarters bly detailed map, made to aid British troops (by the half-brother of 15 George Street John Singleton Copley), includes several structures on the “Gen’l Medford, Massachusetts Royall’s” property as well what are believed to be garden beds on the RoyallHouse.org courtyard side. One of the structures delineated as a simple rectangle is in precisely the position occupied by the Slave Quarters. The Slave Quarters was both described and photographed on several occasions in the nineteenth century. In the second volume of his His- tory of Middlesex County, Samuel Adams Drake noted that “The brick quarters which the slaves occupied are situated on the south side of the mansion and front upon the courtyard, one side of which they enclose. These have remained unchanged, and are, we believe, the last visible relics of slavery in New England.” One hundred years had 2 passed between the period during which the in which ropes were inserted for the purpose of building served as living and working space for hauling heavy crates or barrels out of the cellar.” enslaved Africans and Drake’s observations. On elevations of the exteriors, he noted that the Whether the building was truly “unchanged” is brick facing the courtyard was laid in Flemish impossible to verify, but given its status as a utili- bond, a high-style technique appropriate for the tarian outbuilding, alterations may have been less side that faced the Royalls. likely. It is important to keep in mind that Crytzer’s Around the same time, photographers, including notes were based on his observations of the ar- Boston photographer Wilfred A. French, re- chitecture and whatever knowledge he possessed corded the exterior appearance of the Slave Quarters. These Archives and Library England New Historic images show a building that looks, on the outside, much as it does today, although its weather-beaten bricks and clapboards were in need of attention. There is no docu- mentation of the building’s use by the owners who followed the Royalls. Although it is likely that it continued to be a functional building, it is not known whether it was used as on-site housing, perhaps for domestic workers or those who tended the grounds. Between 1934 and 1935, Medford resident Jacob S. Crytzer created measured about buildings associated with slavery and the drawings of the Slave Quarters as part of the His- institution itself. They do, however, provide a toric American Buildings Survey (HABS), a part starting point for considering not only how the of Franklin Roosevelt’s Works Progress Admini- building looked in the eighteenth century, but stration (WPA) that put unemployed architects to how spaces within were used. work documenting the nation’s built heritage. This series of very detailed drawings gives us a Isaac Royall Sr.’s probate inventory documents sense of the building’s interiors just after the last the presence of an outkitchen, which has been renovation of the frame portion of the building. interpreted to mean the brick portion of the Among the interesting notations made by Crytzer Slave Quarters. It is unclear exactly when the are that the spacw that is now the meeting room frame section was added, but it is likely to have was originally divided into three rooms for en- occurred during his son’s residency, perhaps in slaved families, the room above the outkitchen the 1760s. One of the greatest mysteries has been was probably original and may have been a bed- determining the use of the new section. The de- room, and that there remained several “iron rings 3 lineator of the HABS drawings suggested divisions that accommodated family units, but within the past twenty years, scholars have offered different theories. Edward Chappell of Colonial Williamsburg and ar- chitectural historian Anne Grady have noted that the three sections may have accommodated a variety of uses, including storage and work- space in addition to living quarters. Both cited the paired slave quarters at Arlington House in Virginia. Although they are early nineteenth cen- tury buildings, they share a remarkably similar layout with the Royall Board of Directors House quarters: buildings divided into three sections with an attic 2012-2013 space above. HABS documentation for Arlington’s south Slave Quar- ters notes that according to oral tradition, one end was used to store Co-Presidents supplies, the center was a smokehouse, and the other end and loft Peter Gittleman above were used as living quarters. The north building, also divided in Penny Outlaw three sections, included additional living space, an outkitchen, and a laundry room. This example does not have a direct link to the Royalls’ Communications Secretary Slave Quarters, but provides additional food for thought about how Gracelaw Simmons enslaved people at the site experienced this important building. Recording Secretary Ultimately, the goal of our exploration of the building’s history is to Jennifer Pustz provide additional nuance to our interpretation of the lives of the peo- ple who worked and lived within. Since so little original material exists Treasurer to recreate the interior physically, one solution is to create a conjectural Peter Gittleman drawing that not only depicts how the interiors may have looked but that suggests how they may have been Assistant Treasurer furnished and used. Our board of direc- Margen Kelsey tors has been working with Gerald Fos- ter, a local artist, writer and architect. Board of Directors Gerry recently collaborated with Historic Elizabeth Ammons New England on a series of cutaway John Anderson drawings of seven iconic kitchens fea- Michael Baenen tured in the book and exhibition America’s Anne Donaghy Kitchens. His illustration of Green Hill David Goodine Plantation in Virginia, inspired us to pur- Christina Hunt sue a drawing that would offer our visi- Theresa Kelliher tors a similarly vibrant representation of Michael Oliver the architecture as it is currently under- Pamela Speciale stood, along with people and their sur- roundings. Honorary Directors Detail of Plantation Kitchen, from Lois Hahn During the first stages of the project, we America’s Kitchens, Historic New England Julia Royall have found that there are many more Library and Archives questions than answers. However, we Executive Director hope the interpretation that we create will generate even more thought- Thomas Lincoln ful conversation about what we do and don’t know about this very im- portant part of Medford’s and America’s history. 4 News Briefs A class from St. Peter’s School in Cambridge cess. Some 60 visitors attended, including many came for an early spring tour. The students sent a who had never been to our site, and several came sheaf of tour reviews to Tom Lincoln, our Ex- from other cities and towns. Special thanks go to ecutive Director. There are too many to quote The Friends of the Medford Public Library for their them all, but here are a few comments: “I learned generous donation in support of the event; Barbara that Massachusetts had more slaves than I ex- Kerr of the Medford Public Library was a force of pected.” “On the dining room floor was a cool nature, as always. Volunteers deserve a big “Thank Turkish rug that looks similar to the one in my you”: Anne Donaghy, Beth Fuller, Ryan house.” “My favorite thing was that you set the Hayward, Theresa Kelliher, Margen Kelsey, tone by showing what the slaves did.” Teacher Elizabeth Merrick, Mike Oliver, Penny Outlaw, Nicole Putney also noted that she’ll be back Jennifer Pustz, Dale Rider, and Gracelaw Sim- with her class and others next year. mons. A permanent exhibition entitled Confronting Boston historian Alex Goldfeld presented a lively Our Legacy: Slavery and Antislavery in the program about Boston’s North End on March 21. North opened recently at the Historic New- The SRO crowd was treated to the broad panorama ton’s museum. Working with Melissa of the history of this fabled neighborhood, includ- Westlake, we contributed text and images from ing that of free blacks in the 18th century, the Yan- our archaeological artifacts to the exhibit. Go to kees of the pre-Civil War era, and the successive historicnewton.org for more. waves of Irish and Italian immigration into the 20th century. Mr. Goldfeld has We again hosted the an encyclopedic knowl- Medford Arts Council edge of the people, build- (MAC) annual grantee ings, streets, sights, and showcase in May, which sounds of one of Boston’s was attended by about 60 oldest and most important people.
Recommended publications
  • 11 Spring Newsletter
    New England Our 33nd Year Blacksmiths 1978- To discover, to help -2011 Spring Edition VOL. 31 NO. 2 Exciting News ! Medical research discovers brain variations in those who choose blacksmithing as a career or hobby! Would you like to volunteer for this study? See page 7 for details Inside this Issue: Page 2 Contact & NEB Officers 10 The Anvil Repair Day 17 From the NEBList At Morrell’s How big is your Stack? 3 A Message from the President 11 The Welder’s Play Day 19 From the NEBList At Morrell’s What kind of welder do I 4 Membership forms Need? 12 Are you missing out on 5 Around New England this benefit of membership? 20 From the NEBList Welding helmets? 6 NEB Spring Meeting 13 Isaac Royall? Who? 7 Exciting news & 15 Your Ticket to Hog Morrell’s What’s It Heaven 8 Brentwood North, report Spring 2011 Visit us on line www.newenglandblacksmiths.com page New England Blacksmiths Most recent Contact information for NEB officers and directors Owen Bostrom- President (12) 99 Chase Hill RD Ashaway, RI 02804 Richard Holman- ME Rep. (12) Phone: 401-377-2611 195 Varney Mill Rd [email protected] Windham, ME 04062 The advantage of knowledge Phone: 207-892-9511 is that wisdom itself preserves .Bob Menard– Vice President (12) [email protected] alive its owners. — Eccl. 7:12 56 Warren Ave. Suite 106 Portland, ME 04103 Ed Grove- Me Rep. (11) Phone: 207-878-2217 Please Learn How To Work 828 Haley Town Road Safely [email protected] Brownfield, ME 04010 Phone: 207-935-2262 Jim Crothers- Secretary (12) [email protected] 953 Tuckertown RD Wakefield, RI 02879 Courtney Mead- VT Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • CLIVEDEN (CHEW HOUSE) Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form
    NATIONAL HISTORIC LANDMARK NOMINATION NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 CLIVEDEN (CHEW HOUSE) Page 1 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 1. NAME OF PROPERTY Historic Name: Cliveden (Chew House) Other Name/Site Number: 2. LOCATION Street & Number: 6401 Germantown Avenue Not for publication: City/Town: Philadelphia Vicinity: State: PA County: Philadelphia Code: Zip Code: 19144 3. CLASSIFICATION Ownership of Property Category of Property Private: X Building(s): X Public-Local: District: ___ Public-State: ___ Site: ___ Public-Federal: ___ Structure: ___ Object: ___ Number of Resources within Property Contributing Noncontributing 2 1 buildings sites structures objects 2 1 Total Number of Contributing Resources Previously Listed in the National Register: 1 Name of Related Multiple Property Listing: DRAFT NPS Form 10-900 USDI/NPS NRHP Registration Form (Rev. 8-86) OMB No. 1024-0018 CLIVEDEN (CHEW HOUSE) Page 2 United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form 4. STATE/FEDERAL AGENCY CERTIFICATION As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this ____ nomination ____ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property ____ meets ____ does not meet the National Register Criteria. Signature of Certifying Official Date State or Federal Agency and Bureau In my opinion, the property ____ meets ____ does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Mystic River Master Plan
    Massachusetts Department of Conservation and Recreation MYSTIC RIVER MASTER PLAN Arlington | Boston | Everett | Medford | Somerville November 2009 Commonwealth of Massachusetts Deval Patrick, Governor Timothy Murray, Lieutenant Governor Ian A. Bowles, Secretary, EOEEA Phil Griffiths, Undersecretary, EOEEA Department of Conservation and Recreation Richard K. Sullivan, Commissioner, DCR Jack Murray, Deputy Commissioner for Operations Joe Orfant, Director, Bureau of Planning and Resource Protection Dan Driscoll, Project Manager The Consultant Team Crosby | Schlessinger | Smallridge, LLC: Landscape Architecture and Planning Deneen Crosby, Principal in Charge Carole Schlessinger, Project Manager Carolyn Campbell Ashley Hill Chris Riale Mary Webb Tamar Zimmerman AECOM: Natural Resources Assessment and Environmental Planning Victor Frankenthaler Kimberley Kubera Michael Wierbonics Boelter & Associates, Inc.: Watersheet Planning Alice Boelter i Mystic River Master Plan ii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 Project Area 2 Project Goals 4 Public Process 4 CHAPTER II: EXISTING CONDITIONS 5 Natural Resources 6 Cultural Resources 19 CHAPTER III: THE PLAN 25 Continuous River Corridor Trail System 28 Overlooks and Views 42 Water Trail 43 Signage and Interpretive Elements 44 Fencing Strategy 45 Property Acquisitions and Easement Needs 46 Encroachment on Public Land 47 Access and Connections 47 Dog Recreation 49 Specific Recommendations by Area 50 Section 1: Harvard Avenue Bridge to Auburn Street Bridge 50 Section 2: Auburn Street Bridge to Craddock
    [Show full text]
  • Massachusetts Arts Curriculum Framework
    Massachusetts Arts Curriculum Framework November 1999 Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education 350 Main Street, Malden, MA 02148 Phone 781-338-3000 TTY: N.E.T. Relay 800-439-2370 www.doe.mass.edu Massachusetts Arts Curriculum Framework October 1999 October, 1999 Dear Colleagues, I am pleased to present to you the Massachusetts Arts Curriculum Framework that was adopted by the Board of Education in June, 1999. This second edition of the Arts Curriculum Framework presents the new statewide guidelines for learning, teaching, and assessment in dance, music, theatre, and visual arts for the Commonwealth’s public schools. Based on scholarship, sound research, and effective practice, the Framework will enable teachers and administrators to strengthen curriculum and instruction from PreKindergarten through grade 12. I am proud of the work that has been accomplished. The comments and suggestions received on the first edition of the Arts Curriculum Framework of 1996, as well as comments on subsequent working drafts, have strengthened this new edition. I want to thank everyone who worked with us to create a high quality document that provides challenging learning standards for Massachusetts students. We will continue to work with schools and districts in implementing the Arts Curriculum Framework over the next several years, and we encourage your comments as you use it. All of the curriculum frameworks are subject to continuous review and improvement, for the benefit of the students of the Commonwealth. Thank you again for your
    [Show full text]
  • Slavery in Massachusetts
    SLAVERY IN MASSACHUSETTS By Ellen Knight1 Because the North was free while the South was slave during the Abolitionist and Civil War eras, one may overlook the first two centuries of American history when the north was not free and when slavery was practiced in Massachusetts, even, though rarely, within the boundaries of present-day Winchester. In the Colonial era, slavery as a punishment, either for criminals or prisoners of war, was an accepted European practice. Thus, a number of Scots defeated in border wars with the English were shipped to America, and many Indians defeated in war were sent to the West Indies (including the Squaw Sachem’s son Wenepoykin during King Philip’s War). The African slave trade began in the Massachusetts Bay Colony in 1637 when some defeated Indians from the Pequot War in Connecticut were shipped to the West Indies and the return cargo in 1638 included cotton, tobacco, and Negroes. In 1641, when Winchester’s first settler Edward Converse had just established a mill along the Aberjona River, the Massachusetts General Court adopted The Body of Liberties (the first legal code established by New England colonists) which contained the following article on slavery: There shall never be any bond slaverie, villinage or Captivitie amongst us unles it be lawfull Captives taken in just warres, and such strangers as willingly selle themselves or are sold to us. And these shall have all the liberties and Christian usages which the law of god established in Israell concerning such persons doeth morally require. This exempts none from servitude who shall be Judged thereto by Authoritie.
    [Show full text]
  • Index-1966.Pdf
    2 administered trine Metal ^nflsB tw^^t^tanMBM^ttma*^ ^H ^mmm)ttmmm\^mMrV\,9^* .jrepernesZ Jan 1, 1966 contents page 1 Summary of areas administered by the National Park Service 1 Areas administered by the National Park Service (alphabetical listing) 26 Authorized areas for which lands have not been acquired 28 National Historic Sites not owned by the Federal Government 29 Authorized areas which the National Park Service will not administer 30 Sites declared eligible for the National Registry of Natural Landmarks 31 Sites declared eligible for the Registry of National Historic Landmarks 44 Areas administered by the National Park Service (by category) SUMMARY OF AREAS ADMINISTERED BY THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE [Note: See page 44 for list of areas by category] LANDS WITHIN EX­ CATEGORY NUMBER FEDERAL LAND TERIOR BOUNDARIES TOTAL LANDS WITHIN (ACRES) NOT FEDERALLY EXTERIOR BOUND­ OWNED (ACRES) ARIES (ACRES) NATIONAL PARKS 32 13,619,099.36 207,068.32 13,826, 167.68 NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARKS 10 33,358.91 6, 259. 74 39,618.65 NATIONAL MONUMENTS 77 8,941,778.02 121,209. 13 9,062,987.15 NATIONAL MILITARY PARKS il 29,367.63 2,570.00 31,937.63 NATIONAL MEMORIAL PARK 1 69,000.34 1,435.66 70,436.00 NATIONAL BATTLEFIELDS 5 2,733.01 1,4%. 35 4,229.36 NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD PARKS 4 7,162. 76 2,105.29 9,268.05 NATIONAL BATTLEFIELD SITES 780.04 5.83 785. 87 NATIONAL HISTORIC SITES 23* 3,088. 95 281.56 3,370. 51 NATIONAL MEMORIALS 16 5,319.80 206.
    [Show full text]
  • My Isaac Royall Legacy
    \\server05\productn\H\HBK\24-1\HBK2408.txt unknown Seq: 1 29-MAY-08 9:45 MY ISAAC ROYALL LEGACY Janet Halley* Note to the reader: What follows is a revised version of remarks I delivered on Monday, September 17, 2006 in the Casperson Room at Harvard Law School, at the time of my appointment to the Royall Chair of Law. The portrait of the donor, Isaac Royall, reproduced here as Plate 1 and discussed below, was behind the lectern. I am very grateful to the Harvard BlackLetter Law Journal for pub- lishing this essay. 3 3 Plate 1: Isaac Royall and his Family. Oil on canvas, 56 /16” × 77 /4”. Painted by Robert Feke (1705-1750), 1741. Given to Harvard College in 1879 by Dr. George Stevens Jones. Courtesy of Special Collections Department, Harvard Law School Library. It has been a great honor to me to be appointed the next Royall Chair here at Harvard Law School and I want to extend the deepest gratitude to Dean Kagan for this event in my life. It is a particularly daunting honor because I succeed so many distinguished Royall Chairs. This seems like an opportune moment to remember their names, from the first to the most recent: Isaac Parker, John Hooker Ashmun, Simon Greenleaf, Wil- * Royall Professor of Law, Harvard Law School. Ph.D., English Literature, University of California Los Angeles, 1980. J.D., Yale Law School, 1988. \\server05\productn\H\HBK\24-1\HBK2408.txt unknown Seq: 2 29-MAY-08 9:45 118 ■ HARVARD BLACKLETTER LAW JOURNAL ■ VOL. 24, 2008 liam Kent, Joel Parker, Nathaniel Holmes, James Bradley Thayer, John Chipman Gray, Joseph Henry Beale, Edmund Morris Morgan, John Mac- Arthur Maguire, Paul Abraham Freund, Archibald Cox, Benjamin Kaplan, Vern Countryman, Robert Charles Clark and David Richard Her- witz.1 This is a roll call of immense distinction.
    [Show full text]
  • CITY of MEDFORD COMMUNITY-WIDE SURVEY PLAN Medford, Middlesex County, Massachusetts
    CITY OF MEDFORD COMMUNITY-WIDE SURVEY PLAN Medford, Middlesex County, Massachusetts Acknowledgements Members of the Medford Historical Commission have contributed to the shaping of this plan, in particular Ryan Hayward, who provided direction in finding relevant source materials, and Claire W. Dempsey, who devoted her time and expertise in framing the plan and crafting the final report. Michael Steinitz, Director of the Preservation Planning Division, Massachusetts Historical Commission, was instrumental in the scoping of the project and ensuring the resulting plan comported with current survey standards. The City of Medford Engineering Division was helpful in providing some of the maps and subdivision records used in the creation of this report. The project was financed, in part, with Federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior, through the Massachusetts Historical Commission, Secretary of the Commonwealth William Francis Galvin, Chairman. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior or the Massachusetts Historical Commission, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or the Massachusetts Historical Commission. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity, National Park Service, 1849 C Street NW, Washington, DC 20240.
    [Show full text]
  • Medford, Massachusetts “The Jingle Bell City”
    The Ninth Annual Jingle Bell Festival Medford, Massachusetts “The Jingle Bell City” November 28, 2007 – December 2, 2007 Medford, Massachusetts “The Jingle Bell City” "Jingle Bells," the now world famous holiday tune, was composed at the Simpson Tavern in Medford, Massachusetts in 1850 by James Pierpont (1822-1893). The tavern stood at the site which is now 19 High Street in Medford Square. The song was composed in the presence of Mrs. Otis Waterman, who later verified the location of the song's composition. In 1857, James Pierpont, while living in Georgia, copyrighted "Jingle Bells." The lyrics of the song tell of the sleigh rides held on Salem Street in the early 1800s. Source: Medford Historical Society—1988 1 To All of Those Involved in The Jingle Bell Festival, In Memoriam The generous support provided to The Community Family through donations from the Jingle Bell Festival has enabled us to accomplish so much: build our beautiful Buddy Coholan Memory Loss Center; This year our Jingle Bell Festival booklet is double the number of clients we serve; dedicated in loving memory of the following purchase a wheelchair van to safely transport our Jingle Bell Festival Committee members: clients; and replace furniture and make needed repairs. James (Jim) Mangan Most importantly, The Jingle Bell Committee has significantly improved the quality of life for Medford families who are coping with Alzheimer’s disease. The Sheila McDermott Community Family is proud to be a part of this lovely Festival, which is a joyous Medford holiday tradition. John (Jack) O'Brien On behalf of all of us at The Community Family - - clients, family members and staff - - we send a heartfelt thank you to Thank you for your many years the Jingle Bell Committee, festival sponsors, those who open of dedicated service.
    [Show full text]
  • Patrons, Politics, and Pews: Boston Anglicans and the Shaping of The
    1 PATRON, POLITICS, AND PEWS: BOSTON ANGLICANS AND THE SHAPING OF THE ANGLO-ATLANTIC, 1686-1805 A dissertation presented by Ross A. Newton to The Department of History In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the field of History Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts February, 2016 2 PATRON, POLITICS, AND PEWS: BOSTON ANGLICANS AND THE SHAPING OF THE ANGLO-ATLANTIC, 1686-1805 by Ross A. Newton ABSTRACT OF DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the College of Social Sciences and Humanities of Northeastern University February, 2016 3 This dissertation traces the establishment and expansion of the Church of England in New England through Boston Massachusetts’ three interrelated Anglican Churches, from the establishment of Boston’s King’s Chapel in 1686, as the first Anglican Church in New England, until the formation of the American Protestant Episcopal Church in the years immediately following the American Revolution. Using church vestry records, proprietor records, financial records, correspondence, and material culture, such as pews and communion silver, this project focuses on lay patrons and members of the community who participated in church governance and financially supported or otherwise aided church institutions and fellow congregants. Though rooted in Boston, this project examines a loose transatlantic network of patrons and interest groups, who leveraged their commercial and political expertise for the benefit of individual churches and the advancement of Anglicanism in New England. Working with imperial organs such as the London-based Society of the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts, Boston’s Anglican societies profoundly reshaped the religious landscape of New England and provided for the religious needs of a diverse body of elites and persons of middling and poor means, as well as a sizable number of free and enslaved African Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Longfellow House Bulletin, Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2008
    on fellow ous ulletin Volume No A Newsletter of the Friends of the Longfellow House and the National Park Service December Harvard Scholars Use House As a Laboratory to Examine Material Culture his fall, for the first time, two renowned important tool for histori- Tscholars conducted their Harvard Uni- ans The lower echelons of versity undergraduate class at the Longfel- society usually generate low National Historic Site, using the few written records, but wealth of artifacts held within the House the objects they leave as the basis for study Pulitzer Prize-win- behind can tell us much ning historian and author of A Midwife’sTale about how people lived LaurelThatcher Ulrich and art and cultural and what they thought historian Ivan Gaskell taught the students Students in this course how to decipher objects in order to gain called “Confronting Ob- insight into the cultures that produced jects/Interpreting Culture: them During the semester, students visited Interdisciplinary Perspec- the House at least a half dozen times to tives on North America” examine objects ranging from a vernacular are exploring the methods Laurel Thatcher Ulrich, Jim Shea, and Harvard students at the House door lock to fancy satin brocade shoes used in interpreting artifacts from colonial ological items The high level of documen- Not only historic documents, but also and early American history NPS museum tation for many artifacts in the House offers everyday objects provide clues and infor- staff assembled a list of dozens of objects additional and unusual
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORIC STRUCTURE REPORT SHIRLEY-EUSTIS HOUSE Roxbury
    HISTORIC STRUCTURE REPORT SHIRLEY-EUSTIS HOUSE Roxbury, Massachusetts prepared for SHIRLEY-EUSTIS HOUSE ASSOCIATION by Frederic C. Detwiller The Society for the Preservation of New England Antiquities Consulting Services Group 1979 1 SHIRLEY-EUSTIS HOUSE HISTORIC STRUCTURE REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword Acknowledgements I. Introduction: Goals and Means II. Site History: A) Georgian ca. 1746-1781 B:) Federal ca. 1781-1865 C) Victorian ca. 1865-1915 D) Modern ca. 1915-present III. Architectural History; Documentary, Physical Evidence A) Georgian ca. 1746-1781 B) Federal ca. 1781-1865 C) Victorian ca. 1865-1915 D) Modern ca. 1915-present IV. Decorative History; Paint, Paper, Furnishings: A) Georgian ca. 1746-1781 B) Federal ca. 1781-1865 C) Victorian ca. 1865-1915 D) Modern ca. 1915-present V. Existing Conditions: A) Site B) Architectural C) Decorative VI. Recommendations: A) Site B) Architectural Ci) Decorative VII. Notes VIII. Illustrations A) Maps and Site Plans B) Historic Drawings C) Historic Photographs D) Existing Conditions Drawings E) Existing Conditions Photographs F) Comparative Illustrations G) Restoration Drawings 2 Table of Contents (Cont'd.) IX. Appendix A) Shirley-Eustis House Title Extracts B) Georgian Period Papers C) Federal Period Papers D) Victorian Period Papers E) Modern Period Papers , - '''-. 3 FOREWORD The Shirley-Eustis House has lead a threatened existence since its first mention in the historical records. The home of Colonial Governor William Shirley has survived against all odds and is one of the most important remaining unrestored buildings of both the Georgian and Federal periods in the country. It is the last of the palatial mansions of the Royal governors, and is attributed to Peter Harrison, architect.
    [Show full text]