DOCSLIB.ORG

Ecological Effects of Wave Energy Development in the Pacific Northwest

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ecological Effects of Wave Energy Development in the Pacific Northwest Ecological Effects of Wave Energy Development in the Pacific Northwest A Scientific Workshop, October 11–12, 2007 George W. Boehlert, Gregory R. McMurray, and Cathryn E. Tortorici, editors U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-92 Ecological Effects of Wave Energy Development in the Pacific Northwest A Scientific Workshop, October 11–12, 2007 George W. Boehlert1, Gregory R. McMurray2, and Cathryn E. Tortorici3, editors Workshop Steering Committee: George Boehlert, OSU Hatfield Marine Science Center; Robin Hartmann, Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition; Maurice Hill, U.S. Minerals Management Service; Justin Klure, Oregon Wave Energy Trust; Greg McMurray, Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development; John Meyer, Communication Partnership for Science and the Sea, OSU; Cathy Tortorici, NOAA-NMFS 1Oregon State University, Hatfield Marine Science Center, 2030 SE Marine Science Dr., Newport, Oregon 97365 2Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development, Ocean and Coastal Services Division, 635 Capitol Street NE, Suite 150, Salem, Oregon 97301-2540 3NOAA-NMFS Northwest Region, 1201 NE Lloyd Blvd., Portland, Oregon 97232 NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS-F/SPO-92 September 2008 U.S. Department of Commerce Carlos M. Gutiérrez, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Vice Admiral Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., USN (Ret.) Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere National Marine Fisheries Service James W. Balsiger, Acting Assistant Administrator for Fisheries Suggested citation: Boehlert, G. W, G. R. McMurray, and C. E. Tortorici (editors). 2008. Ecological effects of wave energy in the Pacific Northwest. U.S. Dept. Commerce, NOAA Tech. Memo. NMFS-F/SPO-92, 174 p. A copy of this report may be obtained from: Northwest Fisheries Science Center NMFS, NOAA 2725 Montlake Boulevard East Seattle, Washington 98112 Or online at: http://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/tm/ ii Contents Executive Summary......................................................................................................................................v Acknowledgments........................................................................................................................................ix Introduction and Workshop Objectives George W. Boehlert, Oregon State University, Hatfield Marine Science Center.........................................1 Presentations—Extended Abstracts ..............................................................................................................5 Wave Energy Interest in the Oregon Coast: Policy and Economic Considerations Justin Klure, Oregon Wave Energy Trust.................................................................................................5 The Oregon Shelf/California Current System’s Ecological Setting Bill Peterson, NOAA-NMFS, NWFSC......................................................................................................7 The Technology: Wave Energy Development on the West Coast Mirko Previsic, re vision consulting, LLC..............................................................................................15 Environmental Risk Analysis and Wave Energy: Examples of How to Assess Potential Impacts of Wave Energy on the Environment Maurice L. Hill and Fred M. Piltz, U.S. Minerals Management Service ...............................................22 Wave Energy Ecological Effects Workshop Ecological Assessment Briefing Paper Gregory McMurray, Oregon Department of Land Conservation and Development..................................25 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................25 The Technology......................................................................................................................................25 The Affected Environment: Oregon’s Continental Shelf .......................................................................32 Environmental Effects ............................................................................................................................51 Bibliography and Literature Cited..........................................................................................................63 Breakout Groups .........................................................................................................................................67 Introduction to the Breakout Groups John Meyer, Oregon State University, and Robin Hartmann, Oregon Shores Conservation Coalition.................................................................................................................................................67 Receptor Breakout Group Report: The Physical Environment ..............................................................69 Receptor Breakout Group Report: Pelagic Habitat.................................................................................74 Receptor Breakout Group Report: Benthic Habitat................................................................................78 Receptor Breakout Group Report: Fish and Fisheries............................................................................84 Receptor Breakout Group Report: Marine Birds....................................................................................89 Receptor Breakout Group Report: Marine Mammals.............................................................................95 Stressor Breakout Group Report: Energy Absorbing Structures..........................................................101 Stressor Breakout Group Report: Chemical Effects.............................................................................106 Stressor Breakout Group Report: Hard Structures and Lighting..........................................................110 Stressor Breakout Group Report: Acoustics.........................................................................................114 Stressor Breakout Group Report: Electromagnetic Effects ..................................................................121 Breakout Group Report: System View and Cumulative Effects ..........................................................125 Workshop Integration and Synthesis Cathy Tortorici, NOAA-NMFS .................................................................................................................133 Glossary, Abbreviations, and Acronyms ..................................................................................................139 Appendix 1: Workshop Agenda...............................................................................................................147 iii Appendix 2: Ecological Effects of Wave Energy Development in the Pacific Northwest: Prospectus for a Science Workshop..........................................................................................................149 Appendix 3: Workshop Participants ........................................................................................................153 Appendix 4: Keynote Address— Ocean Zoning: Implications for Wave Energy Development (WED) Richard G. Hildreth ..................................................................................................................................159 Appendix 5: Environmental Consequences of Wave Energy Extraction along the Shores of the U.S. Pacific Northwest: The Physical Environment .........................................................................................163 iv Executive Summary Background wave energy technologies being considered, and frameworks for environmental risk analysis The Pacific Northwest has significant (which were adopted for this workshop) set the opportunity to develop the capacity to harvest stage for a common understanding among wave energy off its coast as a clean, renewable participants. This was followed by a series of resource. While the technology and interest is breakout sessions to address these questions: advancing rapidly, it is important to understand the potential effects of wave energy technology • What is known about important wave on the ecological and physical components of energy facilities, their associated coastal ecosystems. A workshop to address components (such as cables, anchors, these issues was organized at Oregon State and buoys), and their effect on the University’s Hatfield Marine Science Center in physical and biological systems? Newport, Oregon, on October 11–12, 2007. The • What is unknown about these workshop’s problem statement was as follows: relationships, and what are key information gaps? The conversion of ocean waves into electricity has the potential to provide • What is the level of uncertainty or clean, reliable, and low-cost electricity agreement among scientists about these to the economy while producing minimal interactions? impacts on the environment. However, in order for wave energy to develop and • Can we prioritize important ecological fulfill these assumptions, we must issues (e.g., key interactions)? reduce the uncertainties about the • What studies, monitoring, or mitigation technology's effects on the marine measures should be employed to help environment. We must assess the minimize or better understand effects? potential environmental impacts of wave energy, determine what is known and Two sets of breakout sessions were unknown, and identify a rigorous set of convened. The first dealt with “receptors,”
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Evaluating the Future Efficiency of Wave Energy Converters Along The
    energies Article Evaluating the Future Efficiency of Wave Energy Converters along the NW Coast of the Iberian Peninsula Américo S. Ribeiro 1,* , Maite deCastro 2 , Liliana Rusu 3, Mariana Bernardino 4, João M. Dias 1 and Moncho Gomez-Gesteira 2 1 CESAM, Physics Department, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal; [email protected] 2 Environmental Physics Laboratory (EphysLab), CIM-UVIGO, University of Vigo, Campus da Auga building, 32004 Ourense, Spain; [email protected] (M.d.); [email protected] (M.G.-G.) 3 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, ‘Dunarea de Jos’ University of Galati, 47 Domneasca Street, 800 201 Galati, Romania; [email protected] 4 Centre for Marine Technology and Ocean Engineering (CENTEC), Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, 1049-001 Lisbon, Portugal; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 3 June 2020; Accepted: 9 July 2020; Published: 10 July 2020 Abstract: The efficiency of wave energy converters (WECs) is generally evaluated in terms of historical wave conditions that do not necessarily represent the conditions that those devices will encounter when put into operation. The main objective of the study is to assess the historical and near future efficiency and energy cost of two WECs (Aqua Buoy and Pelamis). A SWAN model was used to downscale the wave parameters along the NW coast of the Iberian Peninsula both for a historical period (1979–2005) and the near future (2026–2045) under the RCP 8.5 greenhouse scenario. The past and future efficiency of both WECs were computed in terms of two parameters that capture the relationship between sea states and the WEC power matrices: the load factor and the capture width.
    [Show full text]
  • Part II-1 Water Wave Mechanics
    Chapter 1 EM 1110-2-1100 WATER WAVE MECHANICS (Part II) 1 August 2008 (Change 2) Table of Contents Page II-1-1. Introduction ............................................................II-1-1 II-1-2. Regular Waves .........................................................II-1-3 a. Introduction ...........................................................II-1-3 b. Definition of wave parameters .............................................II-1-4 c. Linear wave theory ......................................................II-1-5 (1) Introduction .......................................................II-1-5 (2) Wave celerity, length, and period.......................................II-1-6 (3) The sinusoidal wave profile...........................................II-1-9 (4) Some useful functions ...............................................II-1-9 (5) Local fluid velocities and accelerations .................................II-1-12 (6) Water particle displacements .........................................II-1-13 (7) Subsurface pressure ................................................II-1-21 (8) Group velocity ....................................................II-1-22 (9) Wave energy and power.............................................II-1-26 (10)Summary of linear wave theory.......................................II-1-29 d. Nonlinear wave theories .................................................II-1-30 (1) Introduction ......................................................II-1-30 (2) Stokes finite-amplitude wave theory ...................................II-1-32
    [Show full text]
  • Denmark Paper May 1 .Yalda Saadat
    Helmholtz Resonance Mode for Wave Energy Extraction Yalda Sadaat#1, Nelson Fernandez#2, Alexei Samimi#3, Mohammad Reza Alam*4, Mostafa Shakeri*5, Reza Ghorbani#6 #Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Hawai’i at Manoa H300, 2540 Dole st., Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA 1 [email protected] 2 [email protected] 3 [email protected] [email protected] *Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of California at Berkeley 6111 Etcheverry Hall, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California, 94720, USA [email protected] [email protected] A. Abstract B. Introduction This study examines the novel concept of extracting wave The extraction of energy from ocean waves possesses immense energy at Helmholtz resonance. The device includes a basin with potential, and with the growing global energy crisis and the need to develop alternative, reliable and environmentally non-detrimental horizontal cross-sectional area A0 that is connected to the sea by a channel of width B and length L, where the maximum water sources of electricity, it’s crucial that we learn to exploit it. depth is H. The geometry of the device causes an oscillating fluid within the channel with the Helmholtz frequency of Beginning in early 19th century France, the idea of harvesting 2 σH =gHB/A0L while the strait's length L, as well as the basin's the ocean’s energy has grown to become a great frontier of the 1/2 length scale A0 , are much smaller than the incoming wave's energy industry. Myriad methods of extraction have arisen, notable wavelength. In this article, we examined the relation of above among them Scotland’s Pelamis Wave Energy Converter [1], Oyster th th frequency to the device’s geometry in both 1/25 and 1/7 [2], Sweden’s Lysekil Project [3], Duck wave energy converter [4], scaled models at wave tank.
    [Show full text]
  • Wave Hub Appendix N to the Environmental Statement
    South West of England Regional Development Agency Wave Hub Appendix N to the Environmental Statement June 2006 Report No: 2006R001 South West Wave Hub Hayle, Cornwall Archaeological assessment Historic Environment Service (Projects) Cornwall County Council A Report for Halcrow South West Wave Hub, Hayle, Cornwall Archaeological assessment Kevin Camidge Dip Arch, MIFA Charles Johns BA, MIFA Philip Rees, FGS, C.Geol Bryn Perry Tapper, BA April 2006 Report No: 2006R001 Historic Environment Service, Environment and Heritage, Cornwall County Council Kennall Building, Old County Hall, Station Road, Truro, Cornwall, TR1 3AY tel (01872) 323603 fax (01872) 323811 E-mail [email protected] www.cornwall.gov.uk 3 Acknowledgements This study was commissioned by Halcrow and carried out by the projects team of the Historic Environment Service (formerly Cornwall Archaeological Unit), Environment and Heritage, Cornwall County Council in partnership with marine consultants Kevin Camidge and Phillip Rees. Help with the historical research was provided by the Cornish Studies Library, Redruth, Jonathan Holmes and Jeremy Rice of Penlee House Museum, Penzance; Angela Broome of the Royal Institution of Cornwall, Truro and Guy Hannaford of the United Kingdom Hydrographic Office, Taunton. The drawing of the medieval carved slate from Crane Godrevy (Fig 43) is reproduced courtesy of Charles Thomas. Within the Historic Environment Service, the Project Manager was Charles Johns, who also undertook the terrestrial assessment and walkover survey. Bryn Perry Tapper undertook the GIS mapping, computer generated models and illustrations. Marine consultants for the project were Kevin Camidge, who interpreted and reported on the marine geophysical survey results and Phillip Rees who provided valuable advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Waves and Structures
    WAVES AND STRUCTURES By Dr M C Deo Professor of Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Bombay Powai, Mumbai 400 076 Contact: [email protected]; (+91) 22 2572 2377 (Please refer as follows, if you use any part of this book: Deo M C (2013): Waves and Structures, http://www.civil.iitb.ac.in/~mcdeo/waves.html) (Suggestions to improve/modify contents are welcome) 1 Content Chapter 1: Introduction 4 Chapter 2: Wave Theories 18 Chapter 3: Random Waves 47 Chapter 4: Wave Propagation 80 Chapter 5: Numerical Modeling of Waves 110 Chapter 6: Design Water Depth 115 Chapter 7: Wave Forces on Shore-Based Structures 132 Chapter 8: Wave Force On Small Diameter Members 150 Chapter 9: Maximum Wave Force on the Entire Structure 173 Chapter 10: Wave Forces on Large Diameter Members 187 Chapter 11: Spectral and Statistical Analysis of Wave Forces 209 Chapter 12: Wave Run Up 221 Chapter 13: Pipeline Hydrodynamics 234 Chapter 14: Statics of Floating Bodies 241 Chapter 15: Vibrations 268 Chapter 16: Motions of Freely Floating Bodies 283 Chapter 17: Motion Response of Compliant Structures 315 2 Notations 338 References 342 3 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Introduction The knowledge of magnitude and behavior of ocean waves at site is an essential prerequisite for almost all activities in the ocean including planning, design, construction and operation related to harbor, coastal and structures. The waves of major concern to a harbor engineer are generated by the action of wind. The wind creates a disturbance in the sea which is restored to its calm equilibrium position by the action of gravity and hence resulting waves are called wind generated gravity waves.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Progress Report: South West 2012 Annual Survey 3 Contents Foreword
    1 The south west now generates around 394 GWh of renewable electricity Renewable Energy from wind each year, which accounts for 28 per cent of renewable electricity in the south west, and 1.5 per cent of Progress Report: our electricity demand South West 2012 Annual Survey Renewable Energy Progress Report: South West 2012 Annual Survey 3 Contents Foreword Foreword 3 Last year global investment in renewable Renewable electricity 4 energy reached £165 billion – on par with Renewable heat 8 fossil fuel investment. The low-carbon Low-carbon economy 12 energy revolution is underway. R&D and technology development 14 This report uses the south west of England as a ‘test bed’ to 3. Some of our elected representatives are misreading the Regen SW’s advisory services 16 look in more detail at what is powering this revolution. It sets public mood: local opinion polls, as well as our experience out the excellent renewable energy resources, the progress we at community events, show a strong and consistent majority Case studies 17 are making in harnessing them and the lessons we can draw for supportive of all renewables, based on a common sense the national Renewable Energy Roadmap to increase the speed view that in an uncertain world we should make the most of Anaerobic digestion and sewage gas 18 of deployment and job creation. our local energy resources. The past year in the south west has seen record growth in 4. We need all renewables: small, medium and large: solar PV Biomass 20 renewable electricity from 218 MW to over 520 MW and has dominated this year’s figures in the south west, but consistent growth in renewable heat.
    [Show full text]
  • Collision Risk of Fish with Wave and Tidal Devices
    Commissioned by RPS Group plc on behalf of the Welsh Assembly Government Collision Risk of Fish with Wave and Tidal Devices Date: July 2010 Project Ref: R/3836/01 Report No: R.1516 Commissioned by RPS Group plc on behalf of the Welsh Assembly Government Collision Risk of Fish with Wave and Tidal Devices Date: July 2010 Project Ref: R/3836/01 Report No: R.1516 © ABP Marine Environmental Research Ltd Version Details of Change Authorised By Date 1 Pre-Draft A J Pearson 06.03.09 2 Draft A J Pearson 01.05.09 3 Final C A Roberts 28.08.09 4 Final A J Pearson 17.12.09 5 Final C A Roberts 27.07.10 Document Authorisation Signature Date Project Manager: A J Pearson Quality Manager: C R Scott Project Director: S C Hull ABP Marine Environmental Research Ltd Suite B, Waterside House Town Quay Tel: +44(0)23 8071 1840 SOUTHAMPTON Fax: +44(0)23 8071 1841 Hampshire Web: www.abpmer.co.uk SO14 2AQ Email: [email protected] Collision Risk of Fish with Wave and Tidal Devices Summary The Marine Renewable Energy Strategic Framework for Wales (MRESF) is seeking to provide for the sustainable development of marine renewable energy in Welsh waters. As one of the recommendations from the Stage 1 study, a requirement for further evaluation of fish collision risk with wave and tidal stream energy devices was identified. This report seeks to provide an objective assessment of the potential for fish to collide with wave or tidal devices, including a review of existing impact prediction and monitoring data where available.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards Integration of Low Carbon Energy and Biodiversity Policies
    Towards integration of low carbon energy and biodiversity policies An assessment of impacts of low carbon energy scenarios on biodiversity in the UK and abroad and an assessment of a framework for determining ILUC impacts based on UK bio-energy demand scenarios SUPPORTING DOCUMENT – LITERATURE REVIEW OF IMPACTS ON BIODIVERSITY Defra 29 March 2013 In collaboration with: Supporting document – Literature review on impacts on biodiversity Document information CLIENT Defra REPORT TITLE Supporting document – Literature review of impacts on biodiversity PROJECT NAME Towards integration of low carbon energy and biodiversity policies PROJECT CODE WC1012 PROJECT TEAM BIO Intelligence Service, IEEP, CEH PROJECT OFFICER Mr. Andy Williams, Defra Mrs. Helen Pontier, Defra DATE 29 March 2013 AUTHORS Mr. Shailendra Mudgal, Bio Intelligence Service Ms. Sandra Berman, Bio Intelligence Service Dr. Adrian Tan, Bio Intelligence Service Ms. Sarah Lockwood, Bio Intelligence Service Dr. Anne Turbé, Bio Intelligence Service Dr. Graham Tucker, IEEP Mr. Andrew J. Mac Conville, IEEP Ms. Bettina Kretschmer, IEEP Dr. David Howard, CEH KEY CONTACTS Sébastien Soleille [email protected] Or Constance Von Briskorn [email protected] DISCLAIMER The project team does not accept any liability for any direct or indirect damage resulting from the use of this report or its content. This report contains the results of research by the authors and is not to be perceived as the opinion of Defra. Photo credit: cover @ Per Ola Wiberg ©BIO Intelligence Service 2013 2 | Towards
    [Show full text]
  • Estimation of Wave Energy from Wind Velocity
    Technological University Dublin ARROW@TU Dublin Articles School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering 2013 Estimation of Wave Energy from Wind Velocity Jonathan Blackledge Technological University Dublin, [email protected] Eugene Coyle Technological University Dublin, [email protected] Derek Kearney Technological University Dublin, [email protected] See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/engscheleart2 Part of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Commons Recommended Citation Blackledge, J., Coyle, E., Kearney, D., McGuirk, R., Norton, B. (2013) Estimation of Wave Energy from Wind Velocity.Accepted for publication in in IAENG Engineering Letters, 2013, Issue 4, p.158-170. doi:10.21427/ D71P6P This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Electrical and Electronic Engineering at ARROW@TU Dublin. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of ARROW@TU Dublin. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License Authors Jonathan Blackledge, Eugene Coyle, Derek Kearney, Ronan McGuirk, and Brian Norton This article is available at ARROW@TU Dublin: https://arrow.tudublin.ie/engscheleart2/64 Estimation of Wave Energy from Wind Velocity Jonathan Blackledge, Eugene Coyle, Derek Kearney, Ronan McGuirk and Brian Norton Abstract—The aim of this paper is to report on a possible between the energy associated with a sea surface wave stream correlation between the Levy´ index for wind velocity and the and the wind velocity time series characterised by the Levy´ mean Energy Density of sea surface waves in the same location.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Hydrokinetic Energy Site Identification and Ranking Methodology Part I: Wave Energy Levi Kilcher and Robert Thresher
    Marine Hydrokinetic Energy Site Identification and Ranking Methodology Part I: Wave Energy Levi Kilcher and Robert Thresher NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Technical Report NREL/TP-5000-66038 October 2016 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Marine Hydrokinetic Energy Site Identification and Ranking Methodology Part I: Wave Energy Levi Kilcher and Robert Thresher Prepared under Task No. WA152001 NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. National Renewable Energy Laboratory Technical Report 15013 Denver West Parkway NREL/TP-5000-66038 Golden, CO 80401 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov October 2016 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • An Update on Large Scale Wave Energy Conversion
    AN UPDATE ON LARGE SCALE WAVE ENERGY CONVERSION Rik van Hemmen, Fellow and Michael Raftery Member Martin Ottaway van Hemmen & Dolan, Inc. [email protected] [email protected] SNAME – SMC 2019 Technical Paper – Peer Reviewed Abstract Submission SNAME FACE: Engineers/Designers Topic: Design and Engineering, Sustainable Energy It is time for Wave Energy Conversion (WEC) to be part of the sustainable energy toolbox at a utility level. Solar and wind renewable power systems are now sustainable technologies which are economically competitive with existing fossil fuel and nuclear options. Even though there have been WEC development efforts as long as there have been industrial solar and wind efforts, WEC systems simply have never made it out of the experimental starting blocks. This paper examines prior efforts and examines why they have failed at a utility level and describes the design and engineering of emerging technologies that could make large scale wave energy conversion competitive with present state of the art large scale wind and solar projects. The SurfWEC concept is introduced as a game changing approach to achieve much lower Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) rates than are achievable with existing WEC approaches by enabling significant increases in kinetic energy input to various WEC designs. KEY WORDS: Renewable Energy; Marine Renewable IEC TC-114: IEC Technical Committee for Marine Energy; Wave Energy Converter; WEC; Marine Hydrokinetic; Energy Standards development and MHK; SurfWEC; Future Energy; Sustainable Energy
    [Show full text]
  • Power of the Tides by Mi C H a E L Sa N D S T R O M Arnessing Just 0.1% of the Potential and Lighthouses
    Volume 28, No. 2 THE HUDSON VALLEY SUMMER 2008 REEN IMES G A publication of Hudson Valley Grass T Roots Energy & Environmental Network Power of the Tides BY MICHAEL SAND S TRO M arnessing just 0.1% of the potential and lighthouses. Portugal plans to build power they will get and when. renewable energy of the ocean a 2.25 megawatt wave farm.1 There are, tidal turbines are somewhat better for could produce enough electric- however, still many difficulties that make the environment than the heavy metals H 3 ity to power the whole world. Scientists wave power less feasible than free-flow used to make solar cells. Since the sun studying the issue say tidal power could tidal power for large-scale energy pro- only shines on average for half a day, solar solve a major part of the complex puzzle duction, including unpredictable storm is not always as predictable due to cloud of balancing a growing population’s need waves, loss of ocean space, and the diffi- coverage. for more energy with protecting an envi- culty of transferring electricity to shore. Although tidal and wind share the ronment suffering from its production Oceanic thermal energy is produced same basic mechanics for generating and use. by the temperature difference existing electricity, wind turbines can only oper- There are three different ways to tap between the surface water and the water ate when there is sufficient wind and they the ocean for electricity: tidal power (free- at the bottom of the ocean, which allows a are sometimes considered aesthetically flowing or dammed hydro), wave power, heat engine to make electricity.
    [Show full text]