DOCSLIB.ORG

Epidemiology of the Arthropod-Borne Encephalitides*

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Epidemiology of the Arthropod-Borne Encephalitides* Budl. Org. mond. Sante 1960, 22, 339-371 Bull. Wld Hlth Org. Epidemiology of the Arthropod-borne Encephalitides* J. A. R. MILES, M.A., M.D., F.R.A.C.P.1 Since the recognition that louping-ill, known for well over 100 years as an epizootic disease ofsheep in Scotland, was caused by a virus transmitted by arthropods, many other arthropod-borne viruses capable of causing encephalitis in domestic animals or man have been discovered. The author reviews here the knowledge at present available on these viruses, originally termed " arthropod-borne encephalitides viruses" but now often referred to as " arbor viruses". In this discussion of the host and vector relationships of the two broad groups ofarbor viruses - the mosquito-borne and the tick-borne-and of the distribution, epidemiology and control of the various diseases they cause, the author includes an outline of the types of investigation likely to provide the most useful information, stressing in this connexion the value of ecological surveys. There are numerous viruses which are transmitted into sub-groups A, B and C and there remains a by arthropods and are capable of causing disease large number of ungrouped viruses also. Within in mammals, at least under experimental conditions, this large group the present review is concerned and new viruses belonging to this group are being dis- solely with those viruses which have been proved to covered regularly. More than seventy such viruses cause encephalitis in man and domestic animals are now recognized (Rockefeller Foundation, 1957; and for which we may still use the old term " arthro- Sabin, 1959). The term "arbor viruses" for this pod-borne encephalitides ". Other arbor viruses group is becoming widely accepted despite the valid will be mentioned only where the consideration of criticism that this name tends to suggest trees rather related viruses may help our understanding of the than arthropods to anyone not particularly interested behaviour of those mainly under consideration and in the viruses. in discussing the value of serological methods in Casals & Brown (1954) subdivided the group on epidemiological work on this group. the basis of the characters of the haemagglutinins HISTORY OF THE ARTHROPOD-BORNE ENCEPHALITIDES Certain of the syndromes caused by these viruses confined to the period between January and April. have been recognized for a long time and probably Cleland & Bradley (1917) gave a full description of the first to be recognized was louping-ill, which has the outbreaks and further studies were reported by been known as an epizootic disease of sheep in Cleland, Campbell & Bradley (1919-20). The virus Scotland for well over 100 years; however, the first was isolated in rhesus monkeys by intracerebral of the viruses to be isolated was that known as the inoculation and the histology of the lesions in the virus of Australian " X " disease. In the years 1917 monkey was distinctly different from that of polio- and 1918 epidemics broke out in rural Victoria and myelitis, although some authorities at the time New South Wales in south-eastern Australia; these were under the impression that this was an aberrant epidemics occurred mainly in the summer months outbreak of poliomyelitis. Unfortunately, the strains of February and March, and were almost entirely of the virus isolated in the outbreaks of 1917, 1918 and 1925 were lost and it has not been possible to * Expanded version of paper submitted to Joint WHO/ compare them with the strains of virus which were FAO Expert Committee on Zoonoses, August 1958 1951 1 Professor of Microbiology, Medical School, University isolated from the large outbreaks occurring in of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand and which have been given the new name of Murray 865 339- 340 J. A. R. MILES Valley encephalitis (MVE). It is, however, virtually There is a further group of closely related viruses certain that the virus of Australian " X " disease transmitted by ticks, and although there appears and that of MVE are the same (Anderson, 1954; to be considerable variation in the biological pro- McLean & Stevenson, 1954; Miles & Howes, perties of these viruses they are all so closely related 1953). serologically that they are regarded as variant Japanese B encephalitis (JBE) originally received strains of one virus. However, for the present that name to differentiate it from type A encephalitis, discussion it will be convenient to use the names which was encephalitis lethargica. Probably the associated with the various syndromes seen in earliest isolations of JBE virus were those made different parts of the world. in 1925 by several Japanese workers (Ito, Tsuchiya It has already been mentioned that the disease & Nakajo; Kojima & Ono; Nishibe; Takaki). louping-ill has been recognized in Scotland for well This virus is one of great importance which is over 100 years, but the etiology of the condition was found over a very wide area of Asia, from southern not understood until Pool, Brownlee & Wilson India through Japan and out to the islands in the first isolated the agent in 1930 and Alston & Gibson Pacific, and is responsible for many severe cases of in 1931 demonstrated that the agent was a filtrable encephalitis. virus transmissible to mice. The disease is a disease A third virus, related to the previous two, suddenly of sheep of very considerable economic importance became epidemic in 1933 in St. Louis and other cities in certain areas, but in Great Britain the number of of the USA. This virus was fully investigated at that human cases is quite small and only very few have time by the US Public Health Service and the out- been recognized until recently. Now it is realized break was fully described in a report (Publ. Hlth that this virus can cause a paralytic disease resem- Bull (Wash.), 1935). Since the first big outbreak bling poliomyelitis, and more cases are being dis- infections with the virus of St. Louis encephalitis covered since virus diagnostic techniques are more (SLE) have been recognized widely over the USA advanced and are being more widely used. and have been extensively studied. The next tick-borne encephalitis virus to be The first of the equine encephalomyelitis viruses isolated was that of Russian far-eastern (spring- to be recognized was that virus now known as summer) encephalitis, which was first isolated by western equine encephalomyelitis (WEE), the more Silber and co-workers in 1937 (see Silber & Shub- widespread and possibly the more important of the ladze, 1945). This virus caused a disease mainly two North American equine encephalitides. This in forest areas and was responsible for disease in virus was first isolated by Meyer, Haring & Howitt man rather than in domestic animals. The disease (1931). In 1933 Tenbroeck & Merrill and Giltner was a highly fatal encephalitis and the maximum & Shahan (1933) isolated a different type of ence- incidence was in the spring and summer. A further phalomyelitis in the eastern states of the USA and virus of this group was isolated in Czechoslovakia this virus is known as the virus of eastern equine in 1948 (Hloucal, 1953; Krej'i, 1949). This virus encephalomyelitis (EEE). These two viruses together causes a biphasic meningo-encephalitis and can be have been responsible for a great deal of disease transmitted by milk as well as by ticks. More and Miller (1945) states that in the worst-affected recently similar viruses have been isolated in the year, 1938, there were 184 162 cases in equines. European USSR and several Eastern and Central Large numbers of human cases have also occurred. European countries. All these viruses belong to A further type of equine encephalomyelitis virus either group A or group B of Casals & Brown, and is found in South America. It was isolated in Vene- the way in which they will be treated in this review zuela and is therefore known as Venezuelan equine will bear some relation to this grouping, but will be encephalomyelitis (VEE) (Beck & Wyckoff, 1938). primarily based on the main vectors for the trans- This virus is highly infectious for man in the labora- mission of the different viruses. First the equine tory, but not so many human cases have been encephalomyelitides will be considered. These reported in the field as there have been of the North viruses all belong to group A. Then the Japanese American equine encephalomyelitides, but this B group of viruses will be considered. These are difference may in part be due to differences in mosquito-borne viruses belonging to group B. After reporting. that the tick-borne viruses will be discussed separa- All the viruses which have been mentioned to tely, although these strains also belong to group B date are viruses normally transmitted by mosquitos. of the arbor viruses. EPIDEMIOLOGY OF THE ARTHROPOD-BORNE ENCEPHALITIDES 341 DISTRIBUTION, OCCURRENCE OF EPIDEMICS, AND TRANSMISSION WESTERN EQUINE ENCEPHALOMYELITIS (WEE) cases have been recorded-for example, Richter's (1942) Chicago case-where it was reasonably Distribution certain that the patient had been infected in a metro- The distribution of WEE in the USA and Canada politan area. Cases of the disease are particularly has been carefully studied. In the USA, the disease common in well-watered and irrigated areas. In the has repeatedly been present in man and domestic studies of Kern County already cited (Buss & animals in the western States and in the Middle Howitt, 1941) all the cases were centred in the West, west of the Mississippi, and occasional out- farming and irrigated areas of the county and breaks have been recorded in States further to the none was reported from the mountain and desert; east and even along the eastern seaboard. In Canada similarly, the Yakima valley in the State of Wash- the disease has been recorded only east of the Rocky ington, a hot irrigated valley, has had numbers of Mountains in Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Phenotypic Diversity in Culex Vishnui Theobald (Culicidae: Diptera)
    International Journal of Mosquito Research 2017; 4(4): 95-100 ISSN: 2348-5906 CODEN: IJMRK2 IJMR 2017; 4(4): 95-100 Phenotypic diversity in Culex vishnui Theobald © 2017 IJMR Received: 03-05-2017 (Culicidae: Diptera) Accepted: 04-06-2017 Monika Airi Monika Airi Assistant Professor, Department of Zoology, Sri Guru Granth Abstract Sahib World University, Samples of Culex vishnui Theobald randomly collected from different water bodies in Chandigarh and Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab, India surrounding parts of Punjab and Haryana states reveal significant morphological differences which may be minor or quite apparent. These differences relate to the distribution and colouration of scales on different parts of body including head, legs and abdomen. The scales present on proboscis and maxillary palp are arranged in a few bands or some of them are scattered on general surface. Their colour varies from pale to dark brown. The shape of such bands on abdominal terga also varies from transverse to triangular bands. The male genitalia is also highly variable presenting difference in number of finger like processes on phallosome along with the length of mesal spine and sternal spine. Possible causes for the appearance of alternate phenotypes have been discussed. Keywords: Mosquito, Culex vishnui, taxonomy, Intraspecific variations. 1. Introduction Culex vishui Theobald 1901 belongs to subgenus Culex of Genus Culex. In India this genus is represented by seven subgenera i.e. Barraudius, Culex, Culiciomyia, Eumelanomyia, Lophoceraomyia, Oculeomyia and Maillotia [1]. Among these, the members of subgenus Culex are most dominant and are the vectors of various diseases like filariasis, elephantiasis and Japanese encephalitis [2, 3].
    [Show full text]
  • Data-Driven Identification of Potential Zika Virus Vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad a Dallas1,3, Barbara a Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Data-driven identification of potential Zika virus vectors Michelle V Evans1,2*, Tad A Dallas1,3, Barbara A Han4, Courtney C Murdock1,2,5,6,7,8, John M Drake1,2,8 1Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 2Center for the Ecology of Infectious Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 3Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California-Davis, Davis, United States; 4Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook, United States; 5Department of Infectious Disease, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 6Center for Tropical Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 7Center for Vaccines and Immunology, University of Georgia, Athens, United States; 8River Basin Center, University of Georgia, Athens, United States Abstract Zika is an emerging virus whose rapid spread is of great public health concern. Knowledge about transmission remains incomplete, especially concerning potential transmission in geographic areas in which it has not yet been introduced. To identify unknown vectors of Zika, we developed a data-driven model linking vector species and the Zika virus via vector-virus trait combinations that confer a propensity toward associations in an ecological network connecting flaviviruses and their mosquito vectors. Our model predicts that thirty-five species may be able to transmit the virus, seven of which are found in the continental United States, including Culex quinquefasciatus and Cx. pipiens. We suggest that empirical studies prioritize these species to confirm predictions of vector competence, enabling the correct identification of populations at risk for transmission within the United States. *For correspondence: mvevans@ DOI: 10.7554/eLife.22053.001 uga.edu Competing interests: The authors declare that no competing interests exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment of a Multiplex RT-PCR for the Sensitive and Differential Detection of Japanese Encephalitis Virus Genotype 1 and 3
    Journal of Bacteriology and Virology 2016. Vol. 46, No. 4 p.231 – 238 http://dx.doi.org/10.4167/jbv.2016.46.4.231 Original Article Establishment of a Multiplex RT-PCR for the Sensitive and Differential Detection of Japanese Encephalitis Virus Genotype 1 and 3 * Dong-Kun Yang , Ha-Hyun Kim, Hyun-Ye Jo, Sung-Suk Choi and In-Soo Cho Viral Disease Division, Animal and Plant Quarantine Agency, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea Japanese encephalitis (JE) is a zoonosis that affects the nervous system of humans and other animals. The genotype of JE virus (JEV) has shifted recently from genotype 3 (G3) to genotype 1 (G1) in Asia, including Korea. Thus, a rapid differential assay is required to make an accurate diagnosis of JEV genotype. In this study, we designed common and differential primer sets for JEV G1 and G3 to detect the JEV envelope (E) gene. The specific primer sets for JEV G1 and 1.0 2.0 2.0 G3 specifically amplified the target gene. The detection limits of the three primer sets were 10 , 10 , and 10 TCID50/ reaction, respectively. No cross-reactivity was detected with non-JEV reference viruses. The multiplex reverse transcription- polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay specifically differentiated JEV G1 from G3. Thus, a one-step multiplex RT-PCR assay was established to rapidly and differentially detect JEV. This assay will be useful for confirming JEV infections in animals and checking the JEV genotype in veterinary biological products. Key Words: Japanese encephalitis virus, Multiplex RT-PCR, Genotype infected mosquito bites. JE cases are traditionally identified INTRODUCTION in Asian countries, but 1.3% of blood donors in French Polynesia were seropositive for JEV between 2011 and 2013 Japanese encephalitis (JE) is a reemerging zoonosis (3), and JEV RNA was detected in C.
    [Show full text]
  • Host-Feeding Patterns of Culex Tritaeniorhynchus and Anopheles Sinensis (Diptera: Culicidae) in a Ricefield Agroecosystem
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Kanazawa University Repository for Academic Resources Host-feeding patterns of Culex tritaeniorhynchus and Anopheles sinensis (Diptera: Culicidae) in a ricefield agroecosystem. 著者 Mwandawiro Charles, Tsuda Yoshio, Tuno Nobuko, Higa Yukiko, Urakawa Emiko, Sugiyama Akira, Yanagi Tetsuo, Takagi Masahiro journal or Medical Entomology and Zoology = 衛生動物 publication title volume 50 number 3 page range 267-273 year 1999-09-15 URL http://hdl.handle.net/2297/12381 TRANSACTIONSOFTHEROYALSOCIETYOFTROPICALMEDICINEANDHYGIENE(2000)94,238-242 Heterogeneity in the host preference of Japanese encephalitis vectors in Chiang Mai, northern Thailand Charles Mwandawiro’ , Michael Boots’, Nobuko Tuna’ , Wannapa Suwonkerd’, Yoshio Tsuda’ and Masahiro Takagi’* ‘Department of Medical Entomology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, 852-8523 Nagasaki, Japan; 20fice of Vector Borne Diseases Control No. 2, 18 Boonruangrit Road, Muang District, Chiang Mai 50200 Thailand Abstract Experiments, using the capture-mark-release-recapture technique inside large nets, were carried out in Chiang Mai, northern Thailand, to examine heterogeneity in the host preference of Japanese encephalitis w) vectors. A significantly higher proportion of the vector species that were initially attracted to a cow fed when released into a net with a cow than when released into a net containing a pig. However, Culex vishnui individuals that had been attracted to a pig had a higher feeding rate in a net containing a pig rather than a cow. When mosquitoes were given a choice by being released into a net containing both animals, they exhibited a tendency to feed on the host to which they had originally been attracted.
    [Show full text]
  • Deciphering the Virome of Culex Vishnui Subgroup Mosquitoes, the Major Vectors of Japanese Encephalitis, in Japan
    viruses Article Deciphering the Virome of Culex vishnui Subgroup Mosquitoes, the Major Vectors of Japanese Encephalitis, in Japan Astri Nur Faizah 1,2 , Daisuke Kobayashi 2,3, Haruhiko Isawa 2,*, Michael Amoa-Bosompem 2,4, Katsunori Murota 2,5, Yukiko Higa 2, Kyoko Futami 6, Satoshi Shimada 7, Kyeong Soon Kim 8, Kentaro Itokawa 9, Mamoru Watanabe 2, Yoshio Tsuda 2, Noboru Minakawa 6, Kozue Miura 1, Kazuhiro Hirayama 1,* and Kyoko Sawabe 2 1 Laboratory of Veterinary Public Health, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8657, Japan; [email protected] (A.N.F.); [email protected] (K.M.) 2 Department of Medical Entomology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, 1-23-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8640, Japan; [email protected] (D.K.); [email protected] (M.A.-B.); k.murota@affrc.go.jp (K.M.); [email protected] (Y.H.); [email protected] (M.W.); [email protected] (Y.T.); [email protected] (K.S.) 3 Department of Research Promotion, Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, 20F Yomiuri Shimbun Bldg. 1-7-1 Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-0004, Japan 4 Department of Environmental Parasitology, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8510, Japan 5 Kyushu Research Station, National Institute of Animal Health, NARO, 2702 Chuzan, Kagoshima 891-0105, Japan 6 Department of Vector Ecology and Environment, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Nagasaki University, 1-12-4 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan; [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Biting Behavior of Malaysian Mosquitoes, Aedes Albopictus
    Asian Biomedicine Vol. 8 No. 3 June 2014; 315 - 321 DOI: 10.5372/1905-7415.0803.295 Original article Biting behavior of Malaysian mosquitoes, Aedes albopictus Skuse, Armigeres kesseli Ramalingam, Culex quinquefasciatus Say, and Culex vishnui Theobald obtained from urban residential areas in Kuala Lumpur Chee Dhang Chena, Han Lim Leeb, Koon Weng Laua, Abdul Ghani Abdullahb, Swee Beng Tanb, Ibrahim Sa’diyahb, Yusoff Norma-Rashida, Pei Fen Oha, Chi Kian Chanb, Mohd Sofian-Aziruna aInstitute of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 50603, bMedical Entomology Unit, WHO Collaborating Center for Vectors, Institute for Medical Research, Jalan Pahang, Kuala Lumpur 50588, Malaysia Background: There are several species of mosquitoes that readily attack people, and some are capable of transmitting microbial organisms that cause human diseases including dengue, malaria, and Japanese encephalitis. The mosquitoes of major concern in Malaysia belong to the genera Culex, Aedes, and Armigeres. Objective: To study the host-seeking behavior of four Malaysian mosquitoes commonly found in urban residential areas in Kuala Lumpur. Methods: The host-seeking behavior of Aedes albopictus, Armigeres kesseli, Culex quinquefasciatus, and Culex vishnui was conducted in four urban residential areas in Fletcher Road, Kampung Baru, Taman Melati, and University of Malaya student hostel. The mosquito biting frequency was determined by using a bare leg catch (BLC) technique throughout the day (24 hours). The study was triplicated for each site. Results: Biting activity of Ae. albopictus in urban residential areas in Kuala Lumpur was detected throughout the day, but the biting peaked between 0600–0900 and 1500–2000, and had low biting activity from late night until the next morning (2000–0500) with biting rate ≤1 mosquito/man/hour.
    [Show full text]
  • Culex Annulirostris
    Mosquito Fact Sheet 2: Culex annulirostris Prepared by Stephen Fricker, Mosquito and Public Health Research Group, University of South Australia 2 1 1 3 3 2 Larva distinctive features; Adult Female distinctive features; 1. Typically with two dark patches on abdomen. 1. Proboscis with pale band in middle. 2. Long siphon (7-8 X long as wide) with 6 hair tufts. 2. Abdomen with distinctive pattern 3. Antennae pale with end third dark 3. Leg segments with pale bands. Ecology This medium sized brown species is found throughout Australia, particularly in warmer weather following rain flooding. Studies have demonstrated adult dispersal of 7 km although the in reality it is possibly fur- ther. The larvae of this species are typically found in fresh and brackish water environments including swamps , lagoons, transient pools. It is an opportunistic feeder bitting a variety hosts including humans, other mammals and birds during the day and at dusk. Identification Adults are a medium sized brownish mosquito with a distinct pale band at the midpoint of the proboscis, a rounded abdomen, and pale bands at the base of each leg segment. The larvae have a long siphon, antennae pale on the basal ⅔ and typical with two dark dorsal patches on abdomen. Disease Risk This species is considered to be one of the most significant vectors of arbovirus such as Ross River Virus and Barmah Forest virus in Australia. Further information : Mosquitoes and Public Health Research Group UNISA: http://www.unisa.edu.au/sansominstitute/mosquito/ Department of Medical Entomology, University of Sydney and Westmead Hospital ; http://medent.usyd.edu.au/ .
    [Show full text]
  • The Efficiency of Various Collection Techniques For
    502 J. A*. Mosg. Coxrnol Assoc. Vor. l, No.4 THE EFFICIENCYOF VARIOUS COLLECTION TECHNIQUES FOR SAMPLING CULEX ANNULIROSZRIS IN SOUTHEASTERN AUSTRALIA RICHARD C. RUSSELL School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, University of Sydney, New South Wales, 2006, Australia ABSTRACT. Dry-ice (COr) baited EVS (Encephalitis Virus Surveillance) light traps collected significantly more Culex annulirostris than unbaited EVS or CDC light traps, chicken-, guinea pig- and rabbit-baited EVS traps, or cubic foot resting boxes. Results from the animal-baited traps indicated a preference for bird versus mammal bait. Females sampled by the resting boxes had significantly lower parity rates than females sampled by dry-ice baited EVS traps. Parity rates were generally similar among females sampled by dry-ice baited EVS traps, unbaited CDC light traps and animal baited EVS light traps. INTRODUCTION trap) similar to the model of Goodwin (1942)1. Traps were set in pairs 20 m apart across the The mosquito Culex annulirostris Skuse is an prevailing breeze, and each test was replicated important vector of arboviruses from both bird three times. The traps were situated approx- and mammal reservoirs in Australia (Doherty imately 250 m from the major larval habitats at 1974). Mosquito populations can be monitored Appin, and approximately 2 km from the larval to predict seasons when above average abun- habitats at Echuca. dance can occur, and investigate the bionomics Female Cx. annulirosfris were counted and of the vector species that relate to its involve- parity status was determined according to the ment in virus cycles. The use of different tech- dissection technique of Detinova (1962).
    [Show full text]
  • Acute and Sublethal Effects of (S)-Methoprene on Some Australian
    1997 Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 13(2):153-155' Copyrighi @ lgg7 by the American Mosquito Control Association, Inc' ACUTE AND SUBLETHAL EFFECTS OF (^'-METHOPRENE ON SOME AUSTRALIAN MOSQUITOES SCOTT A. RITCHIE,T'' MICHAEL ASNICAR3 rNo BRIAN H' KAY' 7 species ABSTRACT. Laboratory bioassays were used to determine the efficacy of (S)-methoprene against to 6'54 of Australian mosquitoes. The gOVo lethal concentration (LC*) ranged from 0.17 ppb for Aedes vigilax ppb for Culex sitiins. The survival of adults exposed as larvae to 2 sublethal dosages of (S)-methoprene was co-purea to a control group. Little effect was noted for Cx. sitiens and Culex annulirostris. However, survival of male and female Ae. vigilax was significantly reduced and appeared to be dose related. Bloodfeeding success of female Ae. vigilctx was also significantly reduced. INTRODUCTION iprasasna et al. 1996). Methoprene is also docu- mented to affect body size (wing length) and sex The insect growth regulator methoprene has been ratio (Robert and Olson 1989). We investigated the successfully used to control many species of mos- effects of sublethal amounts of (S)-methoprene on (for quitoes, with minimal nontarget toxicity a re- adult longevity in Ae. vigilax, Cx. annulirostis, and view see Ross et al. 1994a, 1994b). Methoprene Cx. sitiens, and on bloodfeeding success in Ae. vi- occurs in 2 forms, the (R) and (S) isomers, with gilax, the primary target for mosquito control pro- (.f)-methoprene having the greatest insecticidal ac- grams in coastal Australia. tivity. (,S)-methoprene is available in many formu- lations. Liquid formulations (ALTOSID@ Liquid MATERIALS AND METHODS Larvicide tA.L.L.l) provide control over a limited period, whereas sustained-release formulations Laboratory bioassays: Laboratory bioassays such as ALTOSID@ Pellets and XR Briquets can were used to determine the effectiveness of (S)- control mosquitoes for several months (Kramer et methoprene (A.L.L., 5Vo active ingredient) against al.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Ecology of the Common Banded Mosquito, Culex Annulirostris, a Major Vector of Murray Valley Encephalitis Virus
    ASPECTS OF lHE ECOLOGY OF lHE CCJrvM>N BANDED r-t:>SQUITOJ CULEX ANNULIROSTRIS~ A MAJOR VECTOR OF MURRAY VALLEY ENCEPHALITIS VIRUS by GARRICK McDONALD Dip.Ag.Sci. (Dookie), B.Sc. (La Trobe} A thesis presented in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Master of Agricultural Science, in the Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry, University of Melbourne. December, 1981. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS i ABSTRACT iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS AND STATEMENT OF SOURCES vi LIST OF FIGURES viii LIST OF TABLES xi CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW 1 1.1 CuZex annuZirostris Skuse 1 1.1.1 Importance 1 1.1.2 Distribution 3 1.1.3 Description 4 1.1.4 Life cycle and biological studies 8 1.1.5 Habitat preferences 10 1.1.6 Relative abundance 11 1.1.7 Host preferences 12 1.1.8 Vector status and disease epidemiology 12 1.2 Age specific life and fecundity tables and PoPUlation growth potential 15 1.2.1 The theory 15 1.2.2 Use in mosquito studies 18 CHAPTER 2: EXPERIMENTAL 20 General Introduction 20 2.1 The influence of temperature on development, survival and fecundity of CuZex annuZirostris in the laboratory 21 (a) Juvenile development and survival 22 (b) Adult survival and fecundity 23 (c) ·Age specific life and fecundity tables, and population" statistics 27 2.2 The behaviour of Culex annuZirostris larvae in the laboratory 42 2.3 Field studies of juvenile CuZex annuZirostris 47 2.3.1 .Ecology of Culex annulirostris within a fresh water pond - Mildura 48 (a) Colonization, larval survival and development 50 (b) Time-specific life tables 50 (c)
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquito-Borne Viruses and Non-Human Vertebrates in Australia: a Review
    viruses Review Mosquito-Borne Viruses and Non-Human Vertebrates in Australia: A Review Oselyne T. W. Ong 1,2 , Eloise B. Skinner 3,4 , Brian J. Johnson 2 and Julie M. Old 5,* 1 Children’s Medical Research Institute, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia; [email protected] 2 Mosquito Control Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD 4006, Australia; [email protected] 3 Environmental Futures Research Institute, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD 4222, Australia; [email protected] 4 Biology Department, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA 5 School of Science, Western Sydney University, Hawkesbury, Locked bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Mosquito-borne viruses are well recognized as a global public health burden amongst humans, but the effects on non-human vertebrates is rarely reported. Australia, houses a number of endemic mosquito-borne viruses, such as Ross River virus, Barmah Forest virus, and Murray Valley encephalitis virus. In this review, we synthesize the current state of mosquito-borne viruses impacting non-human vertebrates in Australia, including diseases that could be introduced due to local mosquito distribution. Given the unique island biogeography of Australia and the endemism of vertebrate species (including macropods and monotremes), Australia is highly susceptible to foreign mosquito species becoming established, and mosquito-borne viruses becoming endemic alongside novel reservoirs. For each virus, we summarize the known geographic distribution, mosquito vectors, vertebrate hosts, clinical signs and treatments, and highlight the importance of including non-human vertebrates in the assessment of future disease outbreaks. The mosquito-borne viruses discussed can impact wildlife, livestock, and companion animals, causing significant changes to Australian Citation: Ong, O.T.W.; Skinner, E.B.; ecology and economy.
    [Show full text]
  • Experimental Infection of Culex Annulirostris, Culex Gelidus, and Aedes Vigilax with a Yellow Fever/Japanese Encephalitis Virus Vaccine Chimera (Chimerivax™-Je)
    Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 75(4), 2006, pp. 659–663 Copyright © 2006 by The American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene EXPERIMENTAL INFECTION OF CULEX ANNULIROSTRIS, CULEX GELIDUS, AND AEDES VIGILAX WITH A YELLOW FEVER/JAPANESE ENCEPHALITIS VIRUS VACCINE CHIMERA (CHIMERIVAX™-JE) MARK REID,* DONNA MACKENZIE, ANDREW BARON, NATALIE LEHMANN, KYM LOWRY, JOHN AASKOV, FARSHAD GUIRAKHOO, AND THOMAS P. MONATH Australian Army Malaria Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Life Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Acambis Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts Abstract. Australian mosquitoes from which Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) has been recovered (Culex annu- lirostris, Culex gelidus, and Aedes vigilax) were assessed for their ability to be infected with the ChimeriVax™-JE vaccine, with yellow fever vaccine virus 17D (YF 17D) from which the backbone of ChimeriVax™-JE vaccine is derived and with JEV-Nakayama. None of the mosquitoes became infected after being fed orally with 6.1 log10 plaque-forming units (PFU)/mL of ChimeriVax™-JE vaccine, which is greater than the peak viremia in vaccinees (mean peak vire- days). Some members of all three 11–0 ס PFU/mL of 0.9 days mean duration, range 30–0 ס PFU/mL, range 4.8 ס mia species of mosquito became infected when fed on JEV-Nakayama, but only Ae. vigilax was infected when fed on YF 17D. The results suggest that none of these three species of mosquito are likely to set up secondary cycles of transmission of ChimeriVax™-JE in Australia after feeding on a viremic vaccinee. INTRODUCTION tralia,7–9 and all three species of mosquito have been infected experimentally by membrane feeding with JEV isolates ob- Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is a member of the fam- tained from the Torres Strait of Australia.10 ily Flaviviridae and is a leading cause of viral encephalitis in Asia.
    [Show full text]