DOCSLIB.ORG

A Grammatical Sketch of Sivia Sign Language

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

A GRAMMATICAL SKETCH OF SIVIA SIGN LANGUAGE A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAIʻI AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN LINGUISTICS DECEMBER 2017 By Brenda Rae Clark Dissertation Committee: James Woodward, Chairperson William O'Grady, Chairperson Lyle Campbell Gary Holton Amy Hubbard Keywords: sign language, Peru, sketch grammar, language documentation, South America ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my gratitude to the Bilinski Educational Foundation for providing the funding to carry out fieldwork and to complete this dissertation. I truly would not be here without your generosity. I also want to thank James Woodward for always supporting and encouraging me, for many rounds of feedback on drafts and ideas, and for introducing me to sign linguistics in the first place. William O'Grady has also helped to ensure that this text is as clear and scientific as possible. Support from other faculty, friends, and family has been of monumental importance as well. This applies doubly to my mother, who is also the artist responsible for some of my elicitation materials. A mis participantes en Sivia, no puedo expresar cuanto me han ayudado. Gracias por aceptarme en su vida y por compartir tanto conmigo. Espero que esta descripción revele el respeto enorme que siento por su comunidad y su lenguaje. También hay que agradecer a la Asociación de sordos del Perú y la Asociación de sordos de Ayacucho por guiarme a la región de VRAE, y a la Municipalidad de Sivia por informarme sobre la región y la historia. ii ABSTRACT This sketch grammar presents what is currently known about Sivia Sign Language (LSSiv). It is a language native to Sivia, Peru, used by a small population of deaf and hearing people in the region. Data collected in 2015 and 2016 from native signers is used to describe the language's phonology, morphology, and syntax. Findings align well with the expectations for sign languages, and generational variations indicate ongoing development. LSSiv uses relatively few distinctions in handshape and handedness, placing more importance on locative and non-manual features. Some free variation patterns lead to the proposal of an 'open' feature for handshapes, and orientations are considered to be largely morphological. Both of these are presented as topics for further investigation. LSSiv's lexicon has a flexible class system in which many signs may be used as more than one part of speech, and only one derivational process has been found. Inflection takes the form of location-based agreement for most constituents, as well as shape or directional agreement for verbs with direct or indirect objects. A number of meaningful handshapes are identified, which exhibit some features of 'classifiers'. Simultaneous morphemes which modify signs for size, shape, and intensity marking are also prevalent. Morpho-syntactic patterns relating to role shifts, focus, and phrasing need to be examined more closely. The basic sign order for LSSiv is SOV, with final negation and question signs. A few potential serial verb constructions are also identified. Variations relate to pro-drop, levels of transitivity, and fronting. Observations about contrastive, resultative, and topicalized structures, as well as prosodic patterns, are introduced as areas for future research. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgements ........................................................................................ii Abstract ......................................................................................................iii List of tables............................................................................................... xii List of figures .......................................................................................... xviii Abbreviations ............................................................................................ xix Transcription conventions ............................................................................ xx Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1. Previous work on sign languages ..................................................... 3 1.1 Sign language versus spoken language ............................................................................. 3 1.1.1 Legitimacy and complexity .......................................................................................... 3 1.1.2 Structure ........................................................................................................................ 4 1.1.3 Socio-cultural aspects ................................................................................................... 6 1.1.4 Transmission ................................................................................................................. 7 1.2 Typology................................................................................................................................ 9 1.2.1 Creation ......................................................................................................................... 9 1.2.2 Variation and change.................................................................................................. 11 1.2.3 Classification ............................................................................................................... 12 1.2.4 Shared Traits............................................................................................................... 14 1.3 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 14 Chapter 2. Sign Languages of South America and Peru .................................... 16 2.1 Brazil, Chile, Argentina, Colombia, Ecuador, and Bolivia............................................. 16 2.2 Sign languages of Peru ...................................................................................................... 19 2.2.1 Peruvian Sign Language ............................................................................................ 19 2.2.2 Inmaculada .................................................................................................................. 20 2.2.3 Other communities ..................................................................................................... 22 2.3 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 23 iv Chapter 3. Sivia and LSSiv ........................................................................... 24 3.1 The town of Sivia ............................................................................................................... 24 3.1.1 Location, history, and development .......................................................................... 24 3.1.2 General culture ........................................................................................................... 26 3.1.3 Deaf population and culture ...................................................................................... 26 3.2 Sivia Sign Language .......................................................................................................... 28 3.2.1 Development and current use .................................................................................... 28 3.2.2 External influence and endangerment...................................................................... 29 3.2.3 Comparison to LSP ..................................................................................................... 30 3.3 Summary ............................................................................................................................ 32 Chapter 4. Methodology ............................................................................... 33 4.1 Contact with the community ............................................................................................ 33 4.2 Data collection.................................................................................................................... 34 4.2.1 Consent and compensation ........................................................................................ 35 4.2.2 Equipment and staging .............................................................................................. 36 4.2.3 Elicitation materials ................................................................................................... 38 4.2.4 Narrative and conversational data collection ........................................................... 40 4.2.5 Linguistic interviews and negative evidence............................................................ 41 4.3 Corpus................................................................................................................................. 42 4.3.1 Annotation ................................................................................................................... 42 4.3.2 Clips, images, and drawings ...................................................................................... 43 4.3.3 Transcription and orthography.................................................................................. 44 4.4 Methodological challenges ................................................................................................ 46 Chapter 5. Phonetics ..................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Sign Language Typology Series

    Sign Language Typology Series

    SIGN LANGUAGE TYPOLOGY SERIES The Sign Language Typology Series is dedicated to the comparative study of sign languages around the world. Individual or collective works that systematically explore typological variation across sign languages are the focus of this series, with particular emphasis on undocumented, underdescribed and endangered sign languages. The scope of the series primarily includes cross-linguistic studies of grammatical domains across a larger or smaller sample of sign languages, but also encompasses the study of individual sign languages from a typological perspective and comparison between signed and spoken languages in terms of language modality, as well as theoretical and methodological contributions to sign language typology. Interrogative and Negative Constructions in Sign Languages Edited by Ulrike Zeshan Sign Language Typology Series No. 1 / Interrogative and negative constructions in sign languages / Ulrike Zeshan (ed.) / Nijmegen: Ishara Press 2006. ISBN-10: 90-8656-001-6 ISBN-13: 978-90-8656-001-1 © Ishara Press Stichting DEF Wundtlaan 1 6525XD Nijmegen The Netherlands Fax: +31-24-3521213 email: [email protected] http://ishara.def-intl.org Cover design: Sibaji Panda Printed in the Netherlands First published 2006 Catalogue copy of this book available at Depot van Nederlandse Publicaties, Koninklijke Bibliotheek, Den Haag (www.kb.nl/depot) To the deaf pioneers in developing countries who have inspired all my work Contents Preface........................................................................................................10
  • Grandparents, Parents, Children--And Four Languages: a Deaf Family's Story

    Grandparents, Parents, Children--And Four Languages: a Deaf Family's Story

    This article is a companion to “Family Language Planning with Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children: Fostering Multilingual Development” on page 8 of this issue. Grandparents, Norma Morán, MA, is an active member of Parents, Children—and several organizations, including the National Advisory Group for the Four Languages: National Technical Institute for the Deaf at the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT), the Maryland/DC A Deaf chapter of Hands & Voices, the National Advocacy Organization for Parents of Family’s Story Deaf/Hard of Hearing By Norma Morán and Franklin C. Torres Children, the Latino Deaf Hard of Hearing Association of the Metro Area DC, and the Despite different childhood experiences—primarily differences centered Kendall Parent Teacher Association. She has around language access—both of us felt included in our large Spanish- worked in the Peace speaking families and grew up with a strong sense of cultural identity and Corps in Kenya, the values. Now as we raise our three children together, this is what we want National Institutes of for them as well—a sense of cultural identity and pride … and fluency in Health in Bethesda, Md., and at Gallaudet at least four languages. University in Washington, D.C. She Franklin’s Story currently contracts with I grew up in Lima, Peru, a deaf boy in a Deaf family. Our home language—the Linguabee, a sign language of my younger brother, my parents, an aunt, and a cousin—was Lengua de language interpreting Señas Peruana (Peruvian Sign Language, or LSP). I went to La Inmaculada on the agency. In 2018, Morán outskirts of our city.
  • The 5 Parameters of ASL Before You Begin Sign Language Partner Activities, You Need to Learn the 5 Parameters of ASL

    The 5 Parameters of ASL Before You Begin Sign Language Partner Activities, You Need to Learn the 5 Parameters of ASL

    The 5 Parameters of ASL Before you begin Sign Language Partner activities, you need to learn the 5 Parameters of ASL. You will use these parameters to describe new vocabulary words you will learn with your partner while completing Language Partner activities. Read and learn about the 5 Parameters below. DEFINITION In American Sign Language (ASL), we use the 5 Parameters of ASL to describe how a sign behaves within the signer’s space. The parameters are handshape, palm orientation, movement, location, and expression/non-manual signals. All five parameters must be performed correctly to sign the word accurately. Go to https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrkGrIiAoNE for a signed definition of the 5 Parameters of ASL. Don’t forget to turn the captions on if you are a beginning ASL student. Note: The signer’s space spans the width of your elbows when your hands are on your hips to the length four inches above your head to four inches below your belly button. Imagine a rectangle drawn around the top half of your body. TYPES OF HANDSHAPES Handshapes consist of the manual alphabet and other variations of handshapes. Refer to the picture below. TYPES OF ORIENTATIONS Orientation refers to which direction your palm is facing for a particular sign. The different directions are listed below. 1. Palm facing out 2. Palm facing in 3. Palm is horizontal 4. Palm faces left/right 5. Palm toward palm 6. Palm up/down TYPES OF MOVEMENT A sign can display different kinds of movement that are named below. 1. In a circle 2.
  • Silorb and Signotate: a Proposal for Lexicography and Corpus-Building Via the Transcription, Annotation, and Writing of Signs

    Silorb and Signotate: a Proposal for Lexicography and Corpus-Building Via the Transcription, Annotation, and Writing of Signs

    SiLOrB and Signotate: A Proposal for Lexicography and Corpus-building via the Transcription, Annotation, and Writing of Signs Brenda Clark, Greg Clark [email protected], [email protected] Abstract This paper proposes a system of standardized transcription and orthographic representation for sign languages (Sign Language Orthography Builder) with a corresponding text-based corpus-building and annotation tool (Signotate). The transcription system aims to be analogous to IPA in using ASCII characters as a standardized way to represent the phonetic aspects of any sign, and the writing system aims to be transparent and easily readable, using pictographic symbols which combine to create a 'signer' in front of the reader. The proposed software can be used to convert transcriptions to written signs, and to create annotated corpora or lexicons. Its text-based human- and machine-readable format gives a user the ability to search large quantities of data for a variety of features and contributes to sources, such as dictionaries and transcription corpora. Keywords: transcription, orthography, annotation tools Both currently exist as early versions which aim to 1. Introduction become a standardized and inclusive system for building sign language corpora. This paper proposes a system of standardized transcription and orthographic representation (Sign Language Orthography Builder; SiLOrB), which 2. Sign Language Orthography Builder corresponds to a text-based and searchable dictionary- or (SiLOrB) corpus-building and annotation tool (Signotate). Though a Past attempts at transcription or writing systems for sign few notation and transcription systems have been created languages have had shortcomings such as lack of for sign languages in the past (c.f.
  • Chimpanzees Use of Sign Language

    Chimpanzees Use of Sign Language

    Chimpanzees’ Use of Sign Language* ROGER S. FOUTS & DEBORAH H. FOUTS Washoe was cross-fostered by humans.1 She was raised as if she were a deaf human child and so acquired the signs of American Sign Language. Her surrogate human family had been the only people she had really known. She had met other humans who occasionally visited and often seen unfamiliar people over the garden fence or going by in cars on the busy residential street that ran next to her home. She never had a pet but she had seen dogs at a distance and did not appear to like them. While on car journeys she would hang out of the window and bang on the car door if she saw one. Dogs were obviously not part of 'our group'; they were different and therefore not to be trusted. Cats fared no better. The occasional cat that might dare to use her back garden as a shortcut was summarily chased out. Bugs were not favourites either. They were to be avoided or, if that was impossible, quickly flicked away. Washoe had accepted the notion of human superiority very readily - almost too readily. Being superior has a very heady quality about it. When Washoe was five she left most of her human companions behind and moved to a primate institute in Oklahoma. The facility housed about twenty-five chimpanzees, and this was where Washoe was to meet her first chimpanzee: imagine never meeting a member of your own species until you were five. After a plane flight Washoe arrived in a sedated state at her new home.
  • ISRC Digital Update May 2013

    ISRC Digital Update May 2013

    ISRC Digital Update May 2013 * Printer-Friendly Digital Update Here * If you have any resources that you would like to share with other teachers, parents, and professionals of Deaf and Hard of Hearing youth, please share them with us to be included in future issues. Upcoming Events Contents ~ Deaf Can Do It Community Service Day is May 1st!! Sponsored by the Illinois 1. Upcoming Events Service Resource Center, the theme is People Helping People. On May 1, 2012 Illinois 2. Suggested by People You Deaf and Hard of Hearing School-age Children volunteered all across the state to Know! help their local animal shelters. They set the record as being the largest group of deaf 3. Behavior Solutions and and hard of hearing students to participate in a community service project. A total of Raising Happy Healthy 495 students volunteered! To learn more about this project, please go to Kids www.isrc.us/students. We are encouraging deaf and hard of hearing students from 4. 50 Simple Household Items THIRTEEN Midwest states to get involved in a service project for May 1, 2013 and That Help Your Child the theme is "PEOPLE HELPING PEOPLE." There are many non-profit Become A Math Whiz organizations serving people in your local community that cannot function without 5. Important Research About the input of volunteers. Your local food pantry, homeless shelter, nursing home, Early Learning tutoring/mentoring program, soup kitchen, pregnancy resource center and other 6. Four Things All Educators organizations will greatly appreciate your assistance. There are many benefits to Should Understand About volunteering in the community.
  • The Manual Alphabet

    The Manual Alphabet

    The Manual Alphabet Aa Bb Cc Thumb up, other fingers against Thumb lines up with index or All of the fingers are curved, palm palm middle finger. faces out Dd Ee Ff Thumb touches middle finger. Thumb under index and middle Thumb and index finger touch, Index up. finger others up and apart. Gg Hh Ii Palm faces you, index and Palm faces you, thumb, index Pinky finger up, thumb rest on thumb horizontal and middle finger horizontal index finger. Jj Kk Ll Pinky finger up (i), and the Index up, middle finger out, Index finger up and thumb out, “I”moves down, in, and curves thumb on inside knuckle of forming an imaginary “L” up. middle finger Mm Nn Oo Index, middle and ring finger Index and middle drape over All fingers curved with the tips of over thumb. Thumb on pinky thumb, and thumb on knuckle the index and thumb touching. knuckle of the ring finger. Pp Qq Rr Similar to “K”, but the palm Similar to G, but the palm Index in front of middle finger. faces down, with the middle faces down. Thumb rest on knuckle of ring finger pointing to the floor. finger Ss Tt Uu Fingers clinched in a “fist,” Thumb juts up, between index Index and middle finger up and with thumb on the knuckles of and middle finger. Index together, thumb on knuckle of index and middle finger curves over thumb. ring finger Vv Ww Xx Index and middle finger up Index, middle and ring fingers The fingers clinched in a fist, and apart, thumb on knuckle up and apart, thumb resting on index finger up and bent, like a of ring finger the pinky nail “hook,” and thumb on the knuckles of index and middle finger.
  • Fingerspelling in American Sign Language

    Fingerspelling in American Sign Language

    FINGERSPELLING IN AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE: A CASE STUDY OF STYLES AND REDUCTION by Deborah Stocks Wager A thesis submitted to the faculty of The University of Utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts Department of Linguistics The University of Utah August 2012 Copyright © Deborah Stocks Wager 2012 All Rights Reserved The University of Utah Graduate School STATEMENT OF THESIS APPROVAL The thesis of Deborah Stocks Wager has been approved by the following supervisory committee members: Marianna Di Paolo , Chair 5/10/12 Date Approved Aaron Kaplan , Member 5/10/12 Date Approved Sherman Wilcox , Member 5/10/12 Date Approved and by Edward Rubin , Chair of the Department of Linguistics and by Charles A. Wight, Dean of The Graduate School. ABSTRACT Fingerspelling in American Sign Language (ASL) is a system in which 26 one- handed signs represent the letters of the English alphabet and are formed sequentially to spell out words borrowed from oral languages or letter sequences. Patrie and Johnson have proposed a distinction in fingerspelling styles between careful fingerspelling and rapid fingerspelling, which appear to correspond to clear speech and plain speech styles. The criteria for careful fingerspelling include indexing of fingerspelled words, completely spelled words, limited coarticulation, a slow signing rate, and even rhythm, while rapid fingerspelling involves lack of indexing, increased dropping of letters, coarticulation, a faster signing rate, and the first and last letter of the words being held longer. They further propose that careful fingerspelling is used for initial uses of all fingerspelled words in running signing, with rapid fingerspelling being used for second and further mentions of fingerspelled words.
  • Guideline for Working with Students Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing

    Guideline for Working with Students Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing

    Guidelines for Working with Students Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing in Virginia Public Schools The Virginia Department of Education Department of Special Education and Student Services with The Partnership for People with Disabilities Virginia Commonwealth University Revised September 2019 Copyright © 2019 This document can be reproduced and distributed for educational purposes. No commercial use of this document is permitted. Contact the Virginia Department of Education, Department of Special Education and Student Services prior to adapting or modifying this document for non-commercial purposes. This document can be found at the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) website. Type the title in the “Search” box. The Virginia Department of Education does not discriminate on the basis of race, sex, color, national origin, religion, sexual orientation, age political affiliation, veteran status, or against otherwise qualified persons with disabilities in its programs and activities. TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .......................................................................................................... vi KEY TO ACRONYMS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT ......................................................... viii INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 Law and Regulations ..............................................................................................................
  • The Linguistic Expression of Affective Stance in Yaminawa (Pano, Peru)

    The Linguistic Expression of Affective Stance in Yaminawa (Pano, Peru)

    The Linguistic Expression of Affective Stance in Yaminawa (Pano, Peru) By Kelsey Caitlyn Neely A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Lev D. Michael, Chair Professor Eve Sweetser Professor Justin Davidson Summer 2019 Copyright by Kelsey Caitlyn Neely Abstract The Linguistic Expression of Affective Stance in Yaminawa (Pano, Peru) by Kelsey Caitlyn Neely Doctor of Philosophy in Linguistics University of California, Berkeley Professor Lev D. Michael, Chair This dissertation explores affective expression in Yaminawa, a Panoan language ofPe- ruvian Amazonia. In this study, ‘affect’ is used to refer broadly to the English language concepts of ‘emotion’ and ‘feeling’. Affective expression is approached as an interac- tional phenomenon and it is analyzed in terms of affective stancetaking, i.e., the way speakers position themselves to objects in the discourse as well as their interlocutors via linguistic performance. This study considers affective resources at the levels of the lex- icon, morphology, prosody, acoustics (voice quality, speech rate and volume, etc.), and interactional features (turn duration, complexity of backchannels, etc.). This study contextualizes affective expression in Yaminawa with a detailed descrip- tion of Yaminawa ethnopsychology and the lexical resources that describe affective states, as well as behaviors and bodily sensations that are associated with particular affects by the Yaminawa. Using methods from Cognitive Anthropology, I investigate the ways that native Yaminawa speakers categorize emotion terms, and show that prosociality vs. anti- sociality is a major cultural axis along which emotion terms are conceptually organized.
  • Transmissions. Estudis Sobre La Transmissió Lingüística

    Transmissions. Estudis Sobre La Transmissió Lingüística

    Transmissions. Estudis sobre la transmissió lingüística Edició a cura de Mònica Barrieras i Carla Ferrerós Eumo_Transmissions_2018.indd 3 1/3/19 9:51 © 2018, els autors respectius © d’aquesta edició: Eumo Editorial. C. Doctor Junyent, 1. 08500 Vic www.eumoeditorial.com - [email protected] —Eumo és l’editorial de la UVic-UCC— Primera edició: març de 2019 Disseny de la coberta: Marta Prat Maquetació: ebc, serveis editorials / Grafime Imprès a Romanyà Valls Dipòsit legal: B 6084-2019 ISBN: 978-84-9766-656-5 Eumo_Transmissions_2018.indd 4 1/3/19 9:51 SIGN LANGUAGES AS RESILIENT ENDANGERED LANGUAGES Gemma Barberà Universitat Pompeu Fabra Pepita Cedillo CREDAC Pere Barnils Escola Municipal Tres Pins Santiago Frigola Universitat Pompeu Fabra Cristina Gelpí Universitat Pompeu Fabra Josep Quer Universitat Pompeu Fabra ICREA Jordina Sánchez Amat Universitat Pompeu Fabra In this contribution we review and assess the specificities of vitality and revitalization of sign languages in a context of atypical endangerment. The contribution focuses on concrete examples of revitalization measures, both implemented and not yet implemented, based on the Catalan Sign Language (LSC) community context, such as the important role of language documentation, the reasons of the precarious situation in education and a proposal to establish an inclusive educational model, and finally the potential of an open learning resource offering greater access to sign language education. 1. Introduction Sign languages have not featured prominently in the domain of minority language endangerment and revitalization, partly due to their resilient nature. Despite the traditional minorization Eumo_Transmissions_2018.indd 79 1/3/19 9:51 80 Transmissions. Estudis sobre la transmissió lingüística and neglect by mainstream society in Western countries and the atypical language acquisition path for most signers, educational institutions for the Deaf1 and networks of Deaf social clubs used to ensure transmission and vitality.
  • Sign Languages

    Sign Languages

    200-210 Sign languages 200 Arık, Engin: Describing motion events in sign languages. – PSiCL 46/4, 2010, 367-390. 201 Buceva, Pavlina; Čakărova, Krasimira: Za njakoi specifiki na žestomimičnija ezik, izpolzvan ot sluchouvredeni lica. – ESOL 7/1, 2009, 73-79 | On some specific features of the sign language used by children with hearing disorders. 202 Dammeyer, Jesper: Tegnsprogsforskning : om tegnsprogets bidrag til viden om sprog. – SSS 3/2, 2012, 31-46 | Sign language research : on the contribution of sign language to the knowledge of languages | E. ab | Electronic publ. 203 Deaf around the world : the impact of language / Ed. by Gaurav Mathur and Donna Jo Napoli. – Oxford : Oxford UP, 2011. – xviii, 398 p. 204 Fischer, Susan D.: Sign languages East and West. – (34), 3-15. 205 Formational units in sign languages / Ed. by Rachel Channon ; Harry van der Hulst. – Berlin : De Gruyter Mouton ; Nijmegen : Ishara Press, 2011. – vi, 346 p. – (Sign language typology ; 3) | Not analyzed. 206 Franklin, Amy; Giannakidou, Anastasia; Goldin-Meadow, Susan: Negation, questions, and structure building in a homesign system. – Cognition 118/3, 2011, 398-416. 207 Gebarentaalwetenschap : een inleiding / Onder red. van Anne E. Baker ; Beppie van den Bogaerde ; Roland Pfau ; Trude Schermer. – Deventer : Van Tricht, 2008. – 328 p. 208 Kendon, Adam: A history of the study of Australian Aboriginal sign languages. – (50), 383-402. 209 Kendon, Adam: Sign languages of Aboriginal Australia : cultural, semi- otic and communicative perspectives. – Cambridge : Cambridge UP, 2013. – 562 p. | First publ. 1988; cf. 629. 210 Kudła, Marcin: How to sign the other : on attributive ethnonyms in sign languages. – PFFJ 2014, 81-92 | Pol.